DOCSLIB.ORG

Informe Final De La Cuadragésima Reunión Consultiva Del Tratado Antártico

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Informe Final De La Cuadragésima Reunión Consultiva Del Tratado Antártico Informe Final de la Cuadragésima Reunión Consultiva del Tratado Antártico REUNIÓN CONSULTIVA DEL TRATADO ANTÁRTICO Informe Final de la Cuadragésima Reunión Consultiva del Tratado Antártico Pekín, China 22 de mayo - 1 de junio de 2017 Volumen I Secretaría del Tratado Antártico Buenos Aires 2017 Publicado por: Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty Secrétariat du Traité sur l’ Antarctique Секретариат Договора об Антарктике Secretaría del Tratado Antártico Maipú 757, Piso 4 C1006ACI Ciudad Autónoma Buenos Aires - Argentina Tel: +54 11 4320 4260 Fax: +54 11 4320 4253 Este libro también está disponible en: www.ats.aq (versión digital) y para compras en línea. ISSN 2346-9889 ISBN (vol. I): 978-987-4024-47-3 ISBN (obra completa): 978-987-4024-44-2 Índice VOLUMEN I Siglas y abreviaciones 9 PARTE I. INFORME FINAL 11 1. Informe Final de la XL RCTA 13 2. Informe de la XX Reunión del CPA 133 3. Apéndices 233 Apéndice 1: Programa preliminar, Grupos de Trabajo y asignación de temas para la XLI RCTA 235 Apéndice 2: Comunicado del País Anfi trión 237 PARTE II. MEDIDAS, DECISIONES Y RESOLUCIONES 239 1. Medidas 241 Medida 1 (2017): Zona Antártica Especialmente Protegida n.° 109 (Isla Moe, islas Orcadas del Sur): Plan de Gestión revisado 243 Medida 2 (2017): Zona Antártica Especialmente Protegida n.° 110 (Isla Lynch, islas Orcadas del Sur): Plan de Gestión revisado 245 Medida 3 (2017): Zona Antártica Especialmente Protegida n.° 111 (Isla Powell del Sur e islas adyacentes, islas Orcadas del Sur): Plan de Gestión revisado 247 Medida 4 (2017): Zona Antártica Especialmente Protegida n.° 115 (Isla Lagotellerie, bahía Margarita, tierra de Graham): Plan de Gestión revisado 249 Medida 5 (2017): Zona Antártica Especialmente Protegida n.° 129 (Punta Rothera, isla Adelaida): Plan de Gestión revisado 251 Medida 6 (2017): Zona Antártica Especialmente Protegida n.° 140 (Partes de la isla Decepción, islas Shetland del Sur): Plan de Gestión revisado 253 Medida 7 (2017): Zona Antártica Especialmente Protegida n.° 165 (Punta Edmonson, bahía Wood, mar de Ross): Plan de Gestión revisado 255 Medida 8 (2017): Zona Antártica Especialmente Administrada n.° 5 (Estación Amundsen-Scott del Polo Sur, Polo Sur): Plan de Gestión revisado 257 2. Decisiones 259 Decisión 1 (2017): Grupo Subsidiario del Comité para la Protección del Medio Ambiente sobre respuesta al cambio climático (GSRCC) 261 Decisión 2 (2017): Directrices sobre el procedimiento que a seguir con respecto al carácter de Parte Consultiva 263 Anexo: Directrices sobre el procedimiento a seguir con respecto al carácter de Parte Consultiva 267 Decisión 3 (2017): Medidas retiradas 271 Anexo: Medidas retiradas 273 Decisión 4 (2017): Procedimientos para la designación de Presidentes de los Grupos de Trabajo de la Reunión Consultiva del Tratado Antártico 275 Decisión 5 (2017): Informe, programa y presupuesto de la Secretaría 279 Anexo 1: Informe fi nanciero auditado para 2015 - 2016 281 Anexo 2: Informe fi nanciero provisional para 2016 - 2017 289 Anexo 3: Programa de la Secretaría para 2017 - 2018 291 Decisión 6 (2017): Nombramiento del Secretario Ejecutivo 303 Anexo: Cartas 305 Decisión 7 (2017): Plan de trabajo estratégico plurianual para la Reunión Consultiva del Tratado Antártico 309 Anexo: Plan de trabajo estratégico plurianual de la RCTA 311 3. Resoluciones 317 Resolución 1 (2017): Material de orientación para la designación de Zonas Antárticas Especialmente Administradas (ZAEA) 319 Anexo A: Orientaciones para la evaluación de una zona para su posible designación como Zona Antártica Especialmente Administrada 321 Anexo B: Guía para la preparación de planes de gestión para ZAEA 331 Resolución 2 (2017): Código de conducta del SCAR para la exploración e investigación de medioambientes acuáticos subglaciares 351 Anexo: Código de conducta del SCAR para la exploración e investigación de medioambientes acuáticos subglaciares 353 Resolución 3 (2017): Revisión de las Regiones biogeográfi cas de conservación de la Antártida 359 Anexo: Regiones biogeográfi cas de conservación de la Antártida (Versión 2) 361 Resolución 4 (2017): Expedición ecológica a la Antártida 363 Resolución 5 (2017): Establecimiento del Área Marina Protegida en la región del mar de Ross 365 Resolución 6 (2017): Directrices sobre planes de contingencia, seguros y otros asuntos relacionados con el turismo y otras actividades no gubernamentales en la zona del Tratado Antártico 367 Anexo: Directrices sobre los planes de contingencia, seguros y otros asuntos relacionados con el turismo y otras actividades no gubernamentales en la zona del Tratado Antártico 369 Fotografía de los Jefes de Delegación 371 VOLUMEN II Siglas y abreviaciones PARTE II. MEDIDAS, DECISIONES Y RESOLUCIONES (continuación) 4. Planes de gestión ZAEP n.° 109: Isla Moe, islas Orcadas del Sur ZAEP n.° 110: Isla Lynch, islas Orcadas del Sur ZAEP n.° 111: Isla Powell del Sur e islas adyacentes, islas Orcadas del Sur ZAEP n.° 115: Isla Lagotellerie, bahía Margarita, tierra de Graham ZAEP n.° 129: Punta Rothera, isla Adelaida ZAEP n.° 140: Partes de la isla Decepción, islas Shetland del Sur ZAEP n.° 165: Punta Edmonson, bahía Wood, mar de Ross ZAEA n.° 5: Estación Amundsen-Scott del Polo Sur, Polo Sur PARTE III. DISCURSOS E INFORMES DE APERTURA Y CLAUSURA 1. Discursos de apertura y clausura Discurso de bienvenida pronunciado por el Vice Primer Ministro del Consejo de Estado de la República Popular de China, Sr. Zhang Gaoli 2. Informes de Depositarios y Observadores Informe de los Estados Unidos en su carácter de Gobierno Depositario del Tratado Antártico y su Protocolo Informe de Australia en su carácter de Gobierno Depositario de la CCRVMA Informe de Australia en su carácter de Gobierno Depositario del ACAP Informe del Reino Unido en su carácter de Gobierno Depositario de la CCFA Informe del Observador de la CCRVMA Informe del SCAR Informe del COMNAP 3. Informes de expertos Informe de la OHI Informe de la OMM Informe de la ASOC Informe de la IAATO PARTE IV. DOCUMENTOS ADICIONALES DE LA XL RCTA 1. Documentos adicionales Resumen de la conferencia del SCAR 2. Lista de documentos Documentos de Trabajo Documentos de Información Documentos de Antecedentes Documentos de la Secretaría 3. Lista de participantes Partes Consultivas Partes no Consultivas Observadores, Expertos e Invitados Secretaría del País Anfi trión Secretaría del Tratado Antártico Siglas y abreviaciones ACAP Acuerdo sobre la Conservación de Albatros y Petreles AMP Área Marina Protegida ASOC Coalición Antártica y del Océano Austral BP Documento de Antecedentes CCFA Convención para la Conservación de las Focas Antárticas CCRVMA Convención para la Conservación de los Recursos Vivos Marinos Antárticos y/o Comisión para la Conservación de los Recursos Vivos Marinos Antárticos CCRWP Programa de trabajo de respuesta para el cambio climático CEE (EMG) Evaluación Medioambiental Global CMNUCC Convención Marco de las Naciones Unidas sobre Cambio Climático COI Comisión Oceanográfi ca Intergubernamental COMNAP Consejo de Administradores de Programas Antárticos Nacionales CPA Comité para la Protección del Medio Ambiente EIA Evaluación del Impacto Ambiental FIDAC Fondos internacionales de indemnización de daños debidos a la contaminación por hidrocarburos GCI Grupo de Contacto Intersesional GSCCR Grupo Subsidiario sobre respuesta al Cambio Climático GSPG Grupo Subsidiario sobre Planes de Gestión IAATO Asociación Internacional de Operadores Turísticos en la Antártida IBA Áreas Importantes para la Conservación de las Aves IEE (EMI) Evaluación ambiental inicial IGP&I Clubs Grupo internacional de Clubes de Protección e Indemnización IP Documento de Información IPCC Grupo intergubernamental de expertos sobre cambio climático MARPOL Convenio Internacional para Prevenir la Contaminación por los Buques OACI Organización de Aviación Civil Internacional OHI Organización Hidrográfi ca Internacional OMI Organización Marítima Internacional OMM Organización Meteorológica Mundial OMT Organización Mundial del Turismo PNUMA Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente 9 RBCA Región Biogeográfi ca de Conservación de la Antártida RCC Centros de Coordinación de Rescates RCTA Reunión Consultiva del Tratado Antártico RETA Reunión de Expertos del Tratado Antártico SAR Búsqueda y salvamento SCAR Comité Científi co de Investigación Antártica SC-CAMLR Comité Científi co de la CCRVMA SEII Sistema electrónico de intercambio de información SMH Sitio y Monumento Histórico SOLAS Convenio Internacional para la Seguridad de la Vida Humana en el Mar SOOS Sistema de Observación del Océano Austral SP Documento de la Secretaría STA Sistema del Tratado Antártico o Secretaría del Tratado Antártico UAV/RPAS Vehículos Aéreos no Tripulados / Sistemas de Aeronaves Dirigidas por Control Remoto UICN Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza WP Documento de Trabajo ZAEA Zona Antártica Especialmente Administrada ZAEP Zona Antártica Especialmente Protegida ZIA Zonas importantes para la conservación de las aves 10 PRIMERA PARTE Informe Final 1. Informe Final Informe Final de la Cuadragésima Reunión Consultiva del Tratado Antártico Pekín, China, 23 de mayo al 1 de junio de 2017 (1) De conformidad con el Artículo IX del Tratado Antártico, los representantes de las Partes Consultivas, Alemania, Argentina, Australia, Bélgica, Brasil, Bulgaria, Chile, China, Ecuador, España, los Estados Unidos de Norteamérica, la Federación de Rusia, Finlandia, Francia, India, Italia, Japón, Noruega, Nueva Zelandia, los Países Bajos, Perú, Polonia, Sudáfrica, Suecia, Ucrania, el Reino Unido de Gran
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wastewater Treatment in Antarctica
    Wastewater Treatment in Antarctica Sergey Tarasenko Supervisor: Neil Gilbert GCAS 2008/2009 Table of content Acronyms ...........................................................................................................................................3 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................4 1 Basic principles of wastewater treatment for small objects .....................................................5 1.1 Domestic wastewater characteristics....................................................................................5 1.2 Characteristics of main methods of domestic wastewater treatment .............................5 1.3 Designing of treatment facilities for individual sewage disposal systems...................11 2 Wastewater treatment in Antarctica..........................................................................................13 2.1 Problems of transferring treatment technologies to Antarctica .....................................13 2.1.1 Requirements of the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty / Wastewater quality standards ...................................................................................................13 2.1.2 Geographical situation......................................................................................................14 2.1.2.1 Climatic conditions....................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Station Sharing in Antarctica
    IP 94 Agenda Item: ATCM 7, ATCM 10, ATCM 11, ATCM 14, CEP 5, CEP 6b, CEP 9 Presented by: ASOC Original: English Station Sharing in Antarctica 1 IP 94 Station Sharing in Antarctica Information Paper Submitted by ASOC to the XXIX ATCM (CEP Agenda Items 5, 6 and 9, ATCM Agenda Items 7, 10, 11 and 14) I. Introduction and overview As of 2005 there were at least 45 permanent stations in the Antarctic being operated by 18 countries, of which 37 were used as year-round stations.i Although there are a few examples of states sharing scientific facilities (see Appendix 1), for the most part the practice of individual states building and operating their own facilities, under their own flags, persists. This seems to be rooted in the idea that in order to become a full Antarctic Treaty Consultative Party (ATCP), one has to build a station to show seriousness of scientific purpose, although formally the ATCPs have clarified that this is not the case. The scientific mission and international scientific cooperation is nominally at the heart of the ATS,ii and through SCAR the region has a long-established scientific coordination body. It therefore seems surprising that half a century after the adoption of this remarkable Antarctic regime, we still see no truly international stations. The ‘national sovereign approach’ continues to be the principal driver of new stations. Because new stations are likely to involve relatively large impacts in areas that most likely to be near pristine, ASOC submits that this approach should be changed. In considering environmental impact analyses of proposed new station construction, the Committee on Environmental Protection (CEP) presently does not have a mandate to take into account opportunities for sharing facilities (as an alternative that would reduce impacts).
    [Show full text]
  • CCN Measurements at the Princess Elisabeth Antarctica Research
    bs CCN measurements at the Princess Elisabeth Antarctica Research Station during three austral summers Paul Herenz1, Heike Wex1, Alexander Mangold2, Quentin Laffineur2, Irina V. Gorodetskaya3,4, Zoë L. Fleming5, Marios Panagi5, and Frank Stratmann1 1Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Leipzig, Germany 2Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium, Brussels, Belgium 3Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Department of Physics, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal 4Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium 5National Centre for Atmospheric Science, Department of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK Correspondence to: Heike Wex ([email protected]) Abstract. For three austral summer seasons (2013-2016, each from December to February) aerosol particles arriving at the Belgian Antarctic research station Princess Elisabeth (PE), in Dronning Maud Land in East Antarctica were characterized. in terms 5 ofThis included number concentrations of total aerosol particles (NCN) and cloud condensation nuclei (NCCN), the particle number size distribution (PNSD), the aerosol particle hygroscopicity and the influence of the air mass origin on NCN and −3 −3 NCCN. In general NCN was found to range from 40 to 6700 cm with a median of 333 cm , while NCCN was found to cover a range between less than 10 and 1300 cm−3 for supersaturations (SS) between 0.1 and 0.7 %. It is shown that the aerosol is Aitken mode dominated and is , being characterized by a significant amount of freshly, small, and therefore likely secondarily
    [Show full text]
  • Report for the IUGG National Committee, International Association of Geodesy (IAG) Geodetic Activities in Finland 2004
    Report for the IUGG National Committee, International Association of Geodesy (IAG) Geodetic activities in Finland 2004 Compiled by Markku Poutanen Finnish Geodetic Institute (FGI) 1. The permanent GPS network FinnRef The Finnish Geodetic Institute hosts the permanent GPS network FinnRef which consists of 13 permanent GPS stations. The network is the backbone of the Finnish realisation of the European-wide reference frame EUREF, referred as to EUREF-FIN. Four stations in the FinnRef network belong to the EUREF permanent GPS-network (EPN), and one station belongs to the network of the International GPS Service (IGS). Through these stations FinnRef creates a connection to the global reference frames and the stations are used for maintaining global reference frames and global geodetic studies. The data recorded in the EPS stations (Metsähovi, Vaasa, Joensuu, Sodankylä) are transferred automatically to the EPN data centre in Germany. The data are also transferred daily to the Onsala Space Research Station in Sweden for the BIFROST project. Data download from four Euref-stations were changed to hourly basis at the end of 2004. In 2005 the hourly data delivery is planned. The FinnRef is also used for local studies on crustal movements as well as a reference for local and national GPS measurements. Determination of land uplift, but also studies on periodic effects on data, as well as deformation studies due to loading effects have been made using the permanent network. The absolute gravity observations were made at three GPS stations, viz. in Metsähovi, Vaasa and Joensuu with FG5 gravimeter. The absolute gravity has been observed in Metsähovi more than 80 times since 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness and Aesthetic Values of Antarctica
    Wilderness and Aesthetic Values of Antarctica Abstract Antarctica is the least inhabited region in the world and has therefore had the least influence from human activities and, unlike the majority of the Earth’s continents and oceans, can still be considered as mostly wilderness. As every visitor to Antarctica knows, its landscapes are exceptionally beautiful. It was the recognition of the importance of these characteristics that resulted in their protection being included in the Madrid Protocol. Both wilderness and aesthetic values can be impaired by human activities in a variety of ways with the severity varying from negligible to severe, according to the type Protocol on Environmental Protec tion to the Antarctic Trea ty - of activity and its duration, spatial extent and intensity. A map of infrastructure and major travel routes the "M adrid Protocol" in Antarctica will be the first step in visually representing where wilderness and aesthetic values Article 3[1] may be impacted. It is hoped that this will stimulate further discussion on how to describe, acknowledge, The protection of the Antarctic environment and dependent an d associated ecosystems and the intrinsic value of Antarctica, understand and further protect the wilderness and aesthetic values of Antarctica. including its wilderness and aesthetic values and its value as an area for the conduct of scientific research, in particular research essential to understanding the global environment, shall be fundamental considerations in the planning and condu ct of all activities
    [Show full text]
  • GPS Observations for Ice Sheet History (GOFISH)
    GPS Observations for Ice Sheet History (GOFISH) WASA/ABOA and SVEA stations, East Antarctica December 2001-January 2002 Dan Zwartz, Michiel Helsen Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht University, The Netherlands Contents List of acronyms 2 Map of Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica 3 Introduction 4 GPS Observations for Ice Sheet History (GOFISH) Travel itinerary 5 Expedition timetable 8 GPS geodesy Snow sample programme 12 Glacial geology 18 Weather Stations Maintenance 19 Acknowledgements 20 References 21 Front cover. View on Scharffenbergbotnen in the Heimefrontfjella, near the Swedish field station Svea, East Antarctica (photo by M. Helsen). 1 List of acronyms ABL Atmospheric Boundary Layer AWS Automatic Weather Station CIO Centre for Isotope Research (Groningen University) DML Dronning Maud Land ENABLE EPICA-Netherlands Atmospheric Boundary Layer Experiment EPICA European Project for Ice Coring in Antarctica GISP Greenland Ice Sheet Project GPS Global Positioning System GRIP Greenland Ice Coring Project GTS Global Telecommunication System GOFISH GPS Observations for Ice Sheet History HM Height Meter (stand-alone sonic height ranger) IMAU Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research (Utrecht University) m asl Meters above mean sea level KNMI Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute NWO Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research SL (Atmospheric) Surface Layer (lowest 10% of the ABL) VU Free University of Amsterdam w.e. water equivalents 2 Map of Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica 10°5°0°5°10° 69° FIMFIMBUL
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Composition of Boundary Layer Aerosol Over the Atlantic Ocean and at an Antarctic Site
    Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3407–3421, 2006 www.atmos-chem-phys.net/6/3407/2006/ Atmospheric © Author(s) 2006. This work is licensed Chemistry under a Creative Commons License. and Physics Chemical composition of boundary layer aerosol over the Atlantic Ocean and at an Antarctic site A. Virkkula1, K. Teinila¨1, R. Hillamo1, V.-M. Kerminen1, S. Saarikoski1, M. Aurela1, J. Viidanoja2, J. Paatero1, I. K. Koponen3, and M. Kulmala4 1Finnish Meteorological Institute, Erik Palmenin´ aukio, 00560, Helsinki, Finland 2Department Department of Chemistry, Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry,University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland 3University of Copenhagen, Department of Chemistry, Universitetsparken 5, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark 4Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Aerosol and Environmental Physics Laboratory, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland Received: 5 October 2005 – Published in Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.: 10 January 2006 Revised: 2 June 2006 – Accepted: 16 June 2006 – Published: 21 August 2006 Abstract. Aerosol chemical composition was measured over 1 Introduction the Atlantic Ocean in November–December 1999 and at the Finnish Antarctic research station Aboa in January 2000. Large amounts of man-made and natural aerosols are trans- The concentrations of all anthropogenic aerosol compounds ported every year from the continents over the ocean decreased clearly from north to south. An anthropogenic in- (Lelieveld et al., 2001; Kaufman et al., 2002; Chiapello fluence was still evident in the middle of the tropical South and Moulin, 2002). In the marine environment, these Atlantic, background values were reached south of Cape continentally-derived aerosols influence the climate forc- Town. Chemical mass apportionment was calculated for high ing patterns by scattering and absorbing solar radiation and volume filter samples (Dp<3µm).
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Republic of Germany Antarctic Treaty
    FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY ANTARCTIC TREATY EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION UNDER ARTICLES III (1) AND VII (5) FOR 2008 - 2009 Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs Berlin March 2009 1 2. ANNUAL REPORT (01 October 2007 – 30 September 2008).........................................................................3 2.1 Scientific Information...................................................................................................................................3 2.1.1 Forward Plans ......................................................................................................................................3 2.1.2 Science Activities in the previous year (01 October 2007 – 30 September 2008)...............................3 2.2 Operational Information ........................................................................................................................... 20 2.2.1 National Expeditions.......................................................................................................................... 20 2.3 Permit Information.................................................................................................................................... 54 2.3.1 Visits to Protected Areas................................................................................................................... 54 2.3.2 Taking and harmful interference with flora and fauna....................................................................... 54 2.3.3 Introduction of non-native species ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Are More Antarctic Stations Justified?
    XXVII ATCM ATCM INFORMATION PAPER MARCH 2004 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH AGENDA ITEM 14 ARE MORE ANTARCTIC STATIONS JUSTIFIED? Submitted to the XXVII ATCM by the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition Are More Antarctic Stations Justified? I. INTRODUCTION At least five new Antarctic national stations are currently proposed or planned (Belgium, Czech Republic, Estonia, India and South Korea) (Table I). Other significant infrastructure projects currently underway include substantial upgrades of existing national stations, the development of air links to various locations in Antarctica and related runways, and an ice road to the South Pole. These developments occur in a context of at least 73 established stations (whether full year or summer only), maintained by 26 States already operating in the Antarctic Treaty Area.1 As a whole, the pattern of new station activity does not obviously correlate with new and significant scientific research in previously poorly known parts of Antarctica. If this is so, what is driving the new station activity in Antarctica, is it necessary or desirable, and what alternatives might there be? II. WHAT IS DRIVING THE NEW STATION ACTIVITY IN ANTARCTICA? Many previous drivers of national interests in Antarctica either seemingly no longer apply or do not carry the same importance as they once did in previous eras of Antarctic exploration and expansion. Chief among these would be territorial and sovereignty claims and minerals prospecting. The agreements made within the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS) to freeze territorial claims and the 50-year moratorium on mining would make these unlikely new motivations, at least as long as the status quo remains.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Monitoring at Swedish Research Stations in Antarctica
    Environmental Monitoring at Swedish Research Stations in Antarctica Caroline Watier Master of Science Thesis Stockholm 2008 Caroline Watier Environmental Monitoring at Swedish Research Stations in Antarctica Supervisor & Examiner: Fredrik Gröndahl Master of Science Thesis STOCKHOLM 2008 PRESENTED AT INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY TRITA-IM 2008:03 ISSN 1402-7615 Industrial Ecology, Royal Institute of Technology www.ima.kth.se Environmental Monitoring at Swedish Research Stations in Antarctica Caroline Watier Master of Science Thesis Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden Department of Industrial Ecology 2008 Supervisor: Johan Sidenmark, Environmental Officer Swedish Polar Research Secretariat Examiner: Fredrick Gröndahl Department of Industrial Ecology, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan Swedish Polar Research Secretariat Polarforskningssekretariatet This master thesis is written in cooperation with the Swedish Polar Research Secretariat for SWEDARP, Swedish Antarctic Research Program Environmental Monitoring in Antarctica Acknowledgement This thesis has been going on during 20 weeks during the autumn 2007 semester. It is the conclusive project in the double degree at the Department of Industrial Ecology at Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan (Stockholm, Sweden) and at the Ecole Centrale Marseille (Marseille, France). I would like to express my deepest thanks to the following people for their support during this thesis: My supervisor, Johan Sidenmark, Environmental Officer at the Swedish Polar Research Secretariat for his precious help
    [Show full text]
  • Polar Shifts Sweden and the International Polar Year 2007–2008 Polar Shift S ❄ 
    Polar Shifts Sweden and the International Polar Year 2007–2008 POLAR SHIFT S ❄ 1 Photo: Peter Rosén/Scanpix The International Polar Year 2007–2008 has been a foundations for radical breakthroughs in knowledge, great success. Scientists from across the globe have something that happens infrequently but when it come together to perform work that is of great impor- does, it opens up completely new perspectives for our tance to our common future. The polar regions are world. crucial to the entire planet. But obviously they are The Polar Year has demonstrated that polar even more important to the people who inhabit them. research connects Sweden and Lapland with the part I’m glad that Sweden has been an active par of the Arctic that lies further north – and also with ticipant in the International Polar Year, and that the Antarctic, where many Swedish scientists have Swedish scientists have been working on research been working during the Polar Year. projects within all the scientific disciplines, from Collaboration between the Sami population and social sciences and the humanities to medicine and researchers has been deeper during the Polar Year natural sciences. Along with 63 other countries our than previously. The unique knowledge of the local scientists have contributed to increasing the knowl- population has been utilized and research has to a edge of the and thereby our entire planet. greater extent taken place in communities where I’m proud of the long-standing Swedish tradition people live and work, in cooperation with the Sami of polar research. Early research and continuous data communities and other local residents.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Helsinki Division of Geophysics Seasonal
    UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI DIVISION OF GEOPHYSICS REPORT SERIES IN GEOPHYSICS No 47 SEASONAL SNOW IN ANTARCTICA DATA REPORT K. Rasmus, H. Granberg, K. Kanto, E. Kärkäs, C. Lavoie and M. Leppäranta HELSINKI 2003 UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI DIVISION OF GEOPHYSICS REPORT SERIES IN GEOPHYSICS No 47 Cover: Eija Kärkäs making snowpit measurements on the Högisen ice dome 6.1.2001. Photograph by H. Granberg. SEASONAL SNOW IN ANTARCTICA DATA REPORT K. Rasmus1, H. Granberg2, K. Kanto1, E. Kärkäs1, C. Lavoie2 and M. Leppäranta1 1University of Helsinki, Division of Geophysics, Helsinki, Finland 2Université de Sherbrooke, Centre d’applications et de recherches en teledetection, Sherbrooke, Canada HELSINKI 2003 2 ISBN 952-10-0953-5 ISSN 0355-8630 Helsinki 2003 Yliopistopaino 3 PREFACE The project ’Seasonal Snow in Antarctica’ was set up to measure the physical properties of Antarctic snow cover in 1999-2001. The partners in the project are the Department of Geophysics (from 1 August 2001 the Division of Geophysics at the Department of Physical Sciences) at the University of Helsinki and Centre d'Applications et de Recherches en TÉLédétection (CARTEL) at Université de Sherbrooke in Québec, Canada. The objectives of this Antarctic research project were: to examine the structure and properties of the snow cover; to collect a one year data series of snow cover evolution; to examine the albedo and the internal radiation climate in snow and ice; to examine snow by satellite remote sensing; and to study the snow on Antarctic sea ice cover. Fieldwork was done at the Finnish Antarctic research station Aboa in Dronning Maud Land during FINNARP 1999 and 2000 and at the South African research station SANAE 4 during FINNARP 2000.
    [Show full text]