DOCSLIB.ORG

Pp. 31,968 32,058

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pp. 31,968 32,058 n;TERNn Tl CNJcL ~1111 TARY TRl3UN.t.L FCh THE FAL EAST TRANSCRIPT CF FRCCEEDINGS 29 CCTOBER 1947 pp. 31,968 32,058 DAYlD l\'ELSON SUTTC·N PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/3f9014/ (' PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/3f9014/ 29 OC'rOBER 1947 \ I N D E X Of WITNESSES Def'ense' ·Witnesses ~1ATSUURA, Kusuo (resumed) 31969 Cross (cont'd) by Mr. Blakeney 31969 MORNING RECESS 31992 Redirect by Colonel Ivanov 31993 (~itness excused) 3199, /MURAKAMI, Keisaku 31996 Direct by Colonel Ivanov 31996 NOON RECESS 32014 Direct (conttd) by Colonel ~vanov 32015 Cross by Mr. Blakeney 32017 Question by the President of the Tribuna 1, Sir w illiarr '~!ebb 32020 Cross (cont'd) by 11r. Blakeney 32021 AFTERNOON RECESS 32038 Cross (eont'd) by Mr. Blakeney 32039 Question by the President of the Trib:unal, Sir William Webb 32042 Cross (corit 1 d) by Nir. Blakeney 32043 Cross ( cont 'd) by Mr. Blewett 1 32049 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/3f9014/ 29 OCTOBER 194? I N D E X Of 1NITNESSES (cont'd) Defense' Witnesses IVIURAKAMI, Keisaku ( cont' d) Question by the President of the Tribunal, Sir William Webb 32051 Cross (cont'd) by Mr. Blewett 32052 Redirect by Colonel Ivanov 32056 INDE.X Of EXHIBITS Doc. Def. Pros. Flor In· -~ ~ No. Description --I dent .Evidence- 3372 Affidavit ~f NIDRAKAMI, Keisaku 32007 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/3f9014/ 31,968 1 Wednesday, 29 october 1947 2 - - - 3 4 INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL . FOR TilE FAR EAST 5 Court rouse of the Tribunal War Ministry Building 6 Tokyo, Japan 7 8 The Tribunal met, pursuant to adjournment, 9 at 0930. 10 11 Appearances: 12 For the Tribunal, all Members sitting, with 13 the exception of: HONORABLE JUSTICE R. B. PAL, Merber 14 from India, not sitting fr?m 0930 to 1600; HONORABLE 15. JUSTICE B. V. fl. ROLING, Member from the Kingdom of 16 the Netherlands, not sitting from 1330 to 1445. 17 For the Prosecution~Section, same as before. 18 For the Defense Section, same as before. 19 20 (English to Japanese and Japanese 21 to English interpretation was made by the 22 Language· Section, IMTFE.) 23 24 25 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/3f9014/ MATSUURA CROSS ------· ··-------------- ---------·-----~- --· -----, i B 1 MARSHAL OF THE COURT: The International i n I r 2 ,. Military Tribunal for the Far East is now in session. t 0 3 TEE PRESIDENT: All the accused are present n 4 except SHIRATORI, who is representeo. bjr eounsel. We & 5 have a certificate from the prison SJTgeon at Sugamo y e 6 certifying that he is ill and une..bla to attend the 1 d 7 trial today. The certificate will b? reeorded and e n 8 filed. 9 Major Blakenejr. 10 11 ... KUSUO M A T S U U R A, called as a witness on 12 I · I beh9.lf cf t'ne prosecution, ::.~P?Drn?d the stand and 13 testified through Japanose : nt e;: p~~.Jters as 14 follows: 15 I CROSS-EXAMINATION 16 BY Rffi. BLAKEl'JEY <ccntimJ.ec.) ~ 17 Q Afte:r 7t)Ur· trans "fe:r:o to the Kwantung Army 18 in 1943 you testtried it was quite clear that war 19 would be sto..:r-ted aeainst the USSR. Did you ev"-lr see 20 21 the Kwantung Army operations plans for, say, the 22 year 1943? 23 A I have never seen the operations plan. 24 Q Did you see the operations plan for the year 25 1944? I,. A I have not seen it. ! PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/3f9014/ MATSUURA CROSS 31,971 1 the Kantokuen not only provided for large ... scale 2 maneuvers but also constituted an operational plan 3 for operations against the USSR, did it? 4• A Yes. 5 Q Yesterday you told us something in detail 6 about various maneuvers that were carried out by the 7 Kwantung Army during your time there. You mentioned 8 particularly two: one which you said took place near 9 Chamussu for the purpose of practicing withstanding 10 cold and one at Tsitsihar, a river-crossing operations 11 maneuver. 12 Isn't it a fact that each year in the 13 Kwantung Army there was one large-scale maneuver? 14 COLONEL IVANOV: The prosecution objects to 15 this question as being repetitive and outside the 16 scope of the affidavit. 17 THE PRESIDENT: It certainly is repetitive, 18 Major Blakeney. I would not say it is outside the 19 scope of the affidavit though. 20 21 MR. BLAKE~~Y: He bas never before been asked 22 about any other maneuvers than those two he mentioned. 23 In order to show that these two maneuvers mentioned 24 by him were not the special, significant things that 25 he says, I wish to extract the information that such maneuvers occurred annually. PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/3f9014/ VL.l\ TS 1:JURA CROSS 31,972 COLONEL IVANOV: Your Honor, I must say 1 2 that the Kwantung Army each year held not only one maneuver but they held maneuvers in spring and in the I winter. I. 5 THE PRESIDENT: Colonel, you cannot give I 6 evidence; but we have heard this from other witnesses I 7 and I do not think it is contested that there were 8 annual maneuvers. I '! 9 COLONEL IVANOV: We think that this line of I 10 cross-examination is just a waste of time. 11 11HE PRESIDENT: I think we are all in 12 agreement with that. 13 Q Who told you the contents of the 1945 14 operations plan? 15 A 'I'he person ·who gave me the explanation was 16 Lieutenant Colonel ONO, Katsuichi, who was my superior 17 officer, who was in charge of the signal service 18 section. ~ Was he an operations officer? A He was a staff officer. 22 Q I didn't ask you that. I asked you if he 23 was an operations officer. 24j A He was staff o.f·f'icer in charge of signal ~, I service. LJ I -----~O~-·--~ifu1a~s~h.~e~aun~o~p~e~r~a~t~iwo~n~s~~o~fuf~iwc~e~r~?L·---------------­_t PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/3f9014/ L'L4.TS UDBA CROSS 31 '973 ~---·----A-· He- 'INas not an opera t1.ons officer. ·-I 1 I' Q Was he given access to operations plans? 2 1 A I think, naturally, he was in that position. 31 Q Did he tell you that he had seen the plan? 4 A He o.idn't say that he saw it. 5 Q How did Re say that he got his 1.nformation? A He made no explanation as to how he obtained 7 the information. Q What did he tell you were the contents of 10 the 1945 operations plan? 11 A That the operations plans for 1945 was an 12 operation for the defense of the internal regions of 13 Manchuria, that the duty of the Kwantung Army· was the 14 defense of Korea. 15 The contents of the operations plan vms 16 that at first the units along the Soviet-Manchuln..lo 17 border, especially those on the east front or the 18 north :front, were, while offering resistance, gradually to withdraw, offering-- THE l~DNr.roR: Japanese court reporter. (i~lhereupon, the Japanese court reporter 22 read.) TBE I1TTERPRETER: "I o.o not think the explanation I made, as transcribed by the reporter, is clear, tt statement of the witness. I -- PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/3f9014/ NIATSUORA CROSS 31,974 , I We shall attempt an inte~pretation of a 2 previous statement: 3 The contents of the operations plan was 4 that Japanese units along the Soviet-Manchukuo 5 border, especially those facing the east and northern 6 fronts, were gradually to withdraw while resisting. 7 A (Continuing) Let me repeat that at first 8 units along the border, especially those on the 9 eastern and northern fronts were, in accordance with 10 the resistance situation,to hold out --to conduct 11 holding-out operations; also to conduct a large­ 12 scale repulsive operation against the Soviet Army 13 in the area west of the railway running between 14 Cb.angchun and Dairen which is believed to be the 15 ob,ject of the USSR's attack -- offensive actions 16 in their attack from the westward direction. 17 Q When did the Lieutenant Colonel tell you 18 about this? 19 A The end of June, 1945. 20 ·Q Where? 21 A In an anteroom of the staff department of 22 the Kwantung Army. 23 24 Q Did he tell you how he got his information? 25 COLO}ffiL IVANOV~ The prosecution objects to your Honor, because the whole group of questions ---------------------- PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/3f9014/ UATSUURA CROSS 31,975 1 connected with the plan "f 1945 is outside the 2 scope of the affidavit and the examination-in-chief. 3 THE PRESIDE~IT: The objection is overruled. 4 Q Answer the question. 5 A He did not tell me where and how he obtained such information b~t I believe tb.at it is only natural 7 that he would be able to obtain such information in 8 view of the fact that he was a staff officer in the 9 first section, and being staff officer in charge of lO cornmunications he would naturally be j_n a position to 11 know. 12 Q The staff officer in charge of communications 14 would naturally have communicated to him t~1e part of 1 15 the plans that concerned hirn, wouldn t he? 16 A The matter concerning the staff officer in 17 charge of communications, I cannot relate it to you 1s here.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Final Campaigns: Bougainville 1944-1945
    University of Wollongong Thesis Collections University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Year The final campaigns: Bougainville 1944-1945 Karl James University of Wollongong James, Karl, The final campaigns: Bougainville 1944-1945, PhD thesis, School of History and Politics, University of Wollongong, 2005. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/467 This paper is posted at Research Online. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/467 The Final Campaigns: Bougainville 1944-1945 A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree Doctor of Philosophy from University of Wollongong by Karl James, BA (Hons) School of History and Politics 2005 i CERTIFICATION I, Karl James, declare that this thesis, submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy, in the School of History and Politics, University of Wollongong, is wholly my work unless otherwise referenced or acknowledged. The document has not been submitted for qualifications at any other academic institution. Karl James 20 July 2005 ii Table of Contents Maps, List of Illustrations iv Abbreviations vi Conversion viii Abstract ix Acknowledgments xi Introduction 1 1 ‘We have got to play our part in it’. Australia’s land war until 1944. 15 2 ‘History written is history preserved’. History’s treatment of the Final Campaigns. 30 3 ‘Once the soldier had gone to war he looked for leadership’. The men of the II Australian Corps. 51 4 ‘Away to the north of Queensland, On the tropic shores of hell, Stand grimfaced men who watch and wait, For a future none can tell’. The campaign takes shape: Torokina and the Outer Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Necessary Chicanery : Operation Kingfisher's
    NECESSARY CHICANERY: OPERATION KINGFISHER’S CANCELLATION AND INTER-ALLIED RIVALRY Gary Followill Z3364691 A thesis in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters by Research University of New South Wales UNSW Canberra 17 January 2020 1 Thesis/Dissertation Sheet Australia's Global University Surname/Family Name Followill Given Name/s GaryDwain Abbreviation for degree as give in the University calendar MA Faculty AOFA School HASS Thesis Title Necessary Chicanery: Operation Kingfisher'scancellation and inter-allied rivalry Abstract 350 words maximum: (PLEASE TYPE) This thesis examines the cancellation of 'Operation Kingfisher' (the planned rescue of Allied prisoners of war from Sandakan, Borneo, in 1945) in the context of the relationship of the wartime leaders of the United States, Britain and Australia and their actions towards each other. It looks at the co-operation between Special Operations Australia, Special Operations Executive of Britain and the US Officeof Strategic Services and their actions with and against each other during the Pacific War. Based on hithertounused archival sources, it argues that the cancellation of 'Kingfisher' - and the failure to rescue the Sandakan prisoners - can be explained by the motivations, decisions and actions of particular British officers in the interplay of the wartime alliance. The politics of wartime alliances played out at both the level of grand strategy but also in interaction between officers within the planning headquarters in the Southwest Pacific Area, with severe implications for those most directly affected. Declaration relating to disposition of project thesis/dissertation I hereby grant to the University of New South Wales or its agents the right to archive and to make available my thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in the University libraries in all forms of media, now or here afterknow n, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • RUSI of NSW Article
    Jump TO Article The article on the pages below is reprinted by permission from United Service (the journal of the Royal United Services Institute of New South Wales), which seeks to inform the defence and security debate in Australia and to bring an Australian perspective to that debate internationally. The Royal United Services Institute of New South Wales (RUSI NSW) has been promoting informed debate on defence and security issues since 1888. To receive quarterly copies of United Service and to obtain other significant benefits of RUSI NSW membership, please see our online Membership page: www.rusinsw.org.au/Membership Jump TO Article USI Vol65 No4 Dec14:USI Vol55 No4/2005 28/11/14 10:22 AM Page 15 HISTORY NOTE The Battle for Australia 1942–1945 The Honourable Charlie Lynn, MLC Parliamentary Secretary for Veterans Affairs, New South Wales1 The Battle for Australia commenced with the bombing of Darwin in the Northern Territory on 19 February 1942 and ended with the surrender of the Japanese imperial forces in Wewak in the Papua and New Guinea Mandated Territory on 15 August 1945. Key words: Battle for Australia; Singapore; Java Sea; Sunda Strait; Coral Sea; Midway; Papua; Milne Bay; Kokoda Trail; New Guinea; Salamaua; Lae; Guadalcanal; Wewak. I acknowledge those who have served our nation in been conditioned by the State religion, Shinto, which uniform and those who have sacrificed their lives in inculcated respect for the Emperor, the Head of the defence of freedom. I also wish to congratulate the Japanese family, and respect for one’s ancestors. All Battle for Australia committee for their vision and their Japanese authorities – religious, educational, enter tain - perseverance in commemorating the battles that saved ment and the media – ceaselessly indoctrinated the Australia from 1942 to 1945.
    [Show full text]
  • A Quick Guide to Military Anniversaries in 2017
    RESEARCH PAPER SERIES, 2016–17 3 APRIL 2017 Anzac Day 2017 A quick guide to military anniversaries in 2017 David Watt Foreign Affairs, Defence and Security Section In February 2017, the Minister for Veterans’ Affairs announced a list of significant anniversary dates which will be the focus of commemoration during 2017. The Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA) website provides, where known, further information about the location and nature of the commemorative activities. The DVA Anzac webpage also enables a search of local events within Australia. The following anniversaries are based on the list set out by the Minister. 15 February 2017—75th anniversary of the Fall of Singapore British Prime Minister Winston Churchill described the Commonwealth defeat at Singapore on 15 February 1942 as ‘the worst disaster and largest capitulation in British history’. In just over two months, Japanese forces managed to defeat Commonwealth forces along the Malaysian Peninsula and invade and occupy the ‘Gibraltar of the East’, the British Empire’s main base in Southeast Asia. In Singapore alone, 80,000 Commonwealth troops (the vast majority of which were British, Indian and Australian) became prisoners of war. A further 40,000 Commonwealth troops had been captured in the fighting on the Malay Peninsula. Approximately 15,000 Australians (most of the 8th Division) were captured in Singapore. As many as 7,000 of those would die before the end of the war. More detailed information on the Malayan and Singapore campaigns can be found in the digitised version of Australia’s Official War History; see chapters 7 to 17 of Volume IV—The Japanese thrust.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Army Journal Is Published by Authority of the Chief of Army
    Australian Army Winter edition 2014 Journal Volume XI, Number 1 • What Did We Learn from the War in Afghanistan? • Only the Strong Survive — CSS in the Disaggregated Battlespace • Raising a Female-centric Battalion: Do We Have the Nerve? • The Increasing Need for Cyber Forensic Awareness and Specialisation in Army • Reinvigorating Education in the Australian Army The Australian Army Journal is published by authority of the Chief of Army The Australian Army Journal is sponsored by Head Modernisation and Strategic Planning, Australian Army Headquarters © Commonwealth of Australia 2014 This journal is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of study, research, criticism or review (as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968), and with standard source credit included, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Contributors are urged to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in their articles; the Editorial Advisory Board accepts no responsibility for errors of fact. Permission to reprint Australian Army Journal articles will generally be given by the Editor after consultation with the author(s). Any reproduced articles must bear an acknowledgment of source. The views expressed in the Australian Army Journal are the contributors’ and not necessarily those of the Australian Army or the Department of Defence. The Commonwealth of Australia will not be legally responsible in contract, tort or otherwise for any statement made in this journal. ISSN 1448-2843 Editorial Advisory Board Prof Jeffrey Grey LTGEN Peter Leahy, AC (Retd) MAJGEN Elizabeth Cosson, AM (Retd) Dr John Blaxland BRIG Justin Kelly, AM (Retd) MAJGEN Michael Smith, AO (Retd) Dr Albert Palazzo Mrs Catherine McCullagh Dr Roger Lee RADM James Goldrick (Retd) Prof Michael Wesley AIRCDRE Anthony Forestier (Retd) Australian Army Journal Winter, Volume XI, No 1 CONTENTS CALL FOR PAPERS.
    [Show full text]
  • Coral Sea: Saviour Or Stepping Stone?
    Coral Sea: Saviour or Stepping Stone? The Battles Role in Australia’s Safety During World War II Stephen dos Santos Student No: 30877406 Thesis for Honours Degree of Bachelor of Arts (History) School of Social Sciences and Humanities Murdoch University November 2011 This thesis is presented for the Honours degree of History of Murdoch University Submitted November 2011 This thesis is my own work containing, to the best of my knowledge, no material published or written by another person except as referred to. None of the material submitted as part of this thesis has been accepted for the award of any degree in any tertiary institution. Signed: Stephen dos Santos Date: 12/12/11 Stephen dos Santos COPYRIGHT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I acknowledge that a copy of this thesis will be held at the Murdoch University Library. I understand that, under the provisions of s51.2 of the Copyright Act 1968, all or part of this thesis may be copied without infringement of copyright where such a reproduction is for the purposes of study and research. This statement does not signal any transfer of copyright away from the author. Signed: Stephen dos Santos Full Name of Degree: Bachelor of Arts with Honours in History e.g. Bachelor of Science with Honours in Chemistry. Thesis Title: Coral Sea: Saviour or Stepping Stone? The Battle’s Role in Australia’s Safety During World War II Author: Stephen dos Santos Year: 2011 Abstract A Japanese plan to invade Australia during World War Two has been much disputed. Nevertheless, the safety of Australia throughout the Pacific campaign, especially during 1942, was far from assured.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle for Australia Commemoration Address by CO HMAS Kuttabul
    Battle of Australia Day Commemoration - Sydney 07 Sep 16 Commander Rebecca Jeffcoat, RAN Distinguished Guests, Ladies and Gentlemen First I would like to acknowledge the Gadigal people, the Traditional Custodians of this Land on which we are gathered, and I pay my respects to their elders past and present. I am honoured to be invited to address you on this national day of remembrance. It is a privilege to be able to remember with you today, the events of 1942 and early 1943; the period of time when Australians and our allies fought to defeat Japan’s plan to force Australia’s surrender. ________________ November and December of 1941 were dark months for Australia. HMAS Sydney, and all 645 crew, was lost to the German raider Kormoran. In the Far East the British capital ships Prince of Wales and Repulse were sunk. Hong Kong fell on Christmas day 1941. Malaya was invaded in December and, despite a fighting withdrawal, by 15 February 1942 Singapore was surrendered. This resulted in the imprisonment of 100,000 British, Indian and Australian troops. This series of catastrophic events led to the Australian Prime Minister, John Curtin declaring on 16th February 1942: “The fall of Singapore can only be described as Australia’s Dunkirk... The Fall of Dunkirk initiated the Battle for Britain. The fall of Singapore opens the Battle for Australia.” He foresaw the impending massive struggle to defend Australia against Japanese military aggression; that in the weeks and months 1 and years ahead this ‘Battle for Australia’ would be fought over land and at sea – challenging Australia’s territorial integrity.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Memory and the Second World War
    Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 14, ISSUE 1, FALL 2011 Studies The Second War in Every Respect: Australian memory and the Second World War Joan Beaumont The Second World War stands across the 20th century like a colossus. Its death toll, geographical spread, social dislocation and genocidal slaughter were unprecedented. It was literally a world war, devastating Europe, China and Japan, triggering massive movements of population, and unleashing forces of nationalism in Asia and Africa that presaged the end of European colonialism. The international order was changed irrevocably, most notably in the rise of the two superpowers and the decline of Great Britain. For Australia too, though the loss of life in the conflict was comparatively small, the war had a profound impact. The white population faced for the first time the threat of invasion, with Australian territory being bombed from the air and sea in 1942.1 The economy and society were mobilized to an unprecedented degree, with 993,000 men and women, of a population of nearly seven million, serving in the military forces. Nearly 40,000 of these were killed in action, died of wounds or died while prisoners of war.2 Gender roles, family life and social mores were changed with the mobilization of women into the industrial workforce and the friendly invasion of possibly a million 1 The heaviest raid was on the northern city of Darwin on 19 February 1942. Other towns in the north of Western Australia and Queensland were bombed across 1942; while on 31 May 1942 three Japanese midget submarines entered Sydney Harbour and shelled the suburbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering the Battle for Australia
    Remembering the Battle for Australia Elizabeth Rechniewski, University of Sydney Introduction On 26 June 2008 the Australian minister for Veterans’ Affairs, Alan Griffin, announced that ‘Battle for Australia Day’ would be commemorated on the first Wednesday in September; this proclamation fulfilled a Labor Party election promise and followed a ten-year campaign by returned soldiers and others to commemorate the battles that constituted the Pacific War. The very recent inauguration of this day enables an examination of the dynamics of the processes involved in the construction of national commemorations. The aim of this article is to identify the various agencies involved in the process of ‘remembering the Battle for Australia’ and the channels they have used to spread their message; to trace the political and historical controversies surrounding the notion of a ‘Battle for Australia’ and the conflicting narratives to which they have given rise; and to outline the ‘chronopolitics,’ the shifts in domestic and international politics that ‘over time created the conditions for changes in the memoryscape and, sometimes, alterations in the heroic narrative as well’ (Gluck 2007: 61). The title of this article is intended to recall Jay Winter’s insistence that the terms ‘remembering’ and ‘remembrance’ be used, rather than memory, in order to emphasise the active role of agents in the creation and perpetuation of memory and acts of commemoration (2006: 3). Timothy Ashplant, Grant Dawson and Michael Roper, in a broad ranging study of war memory, emphasise the role of constituencies, or agents of remembrance in the process of memory formation and the struggle to articulate distinct and often competing memories in the array of arenas available.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER PO Box 410 Paddington NSW 2021 August / September2014
    PATRON: Her Excellency Professor Marie Bashir AC CVO Governor of NSW COMMEMORATING THE DEEDS AND SACRIFICES OF OUR PREDECESSORS IN THE CENTURY OF ANZAC NEWSLETTER PO Box 410 Paddington NSW 2021 August / September2014 I invite readers to reflect on all of the Dramatically, the commencement of both CHAIRMAN’S MESSAGE actions that we commemorate. Among World Wars in Australia saw Fort Nepean those who gather at the Cenotaph will be (at Queenscliff Vic.) firing warning shots at those who experienced; took part; who German ships attempting to leave Australia. suffered; or wish to remember those who did. While no listing can be complete, I As we remember, whenever we gather, not would like to mention but a number of the only “all of those who served” but also events/actions that can be seen as part of those who waited, who lost loved ones and the Battle for Australia. A battle that who, by their efforts, made a considerable involved each of our three services and our sacrifice in the Defence of Australia. Merchant Navy, supported by all of those National organisations involved in the War. Thank you for your support to Battle of Australia activities and your contribution as Major activities that were the key elements we all seek to give substance to: of the Battle for Australia were: “We will remember them.” ● The Battle for Singapore-Malaya. Sincerely, Warren Glenny. AO RFD ED ● The campaigns across the island chain Major General (Rtd). Chairman, Battle for to our North, not limited to, but including, Australia Association. Major General Warren Glenny Timor, Rabaul and New Guinea.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle for Australia Commemoration
    AIR MAIL OCTOBER / NOVEMBER 2019 PRINT POST APPROVED PP100017557 Dont forget to keep up to date with what’s happening at RAAFA WA and check out our Facebook page. Battle for Australia Commemoration Battle for Australia Day RAAFA was proud to join forces is commemorated on the first with the staff and students of All Wednesday in September to mark Saints’ College this year with year the first defeat of Japanese forces in 10 students, Kaile Hong and Dante the Battle of Milne Bay. Barrett, making the presentation and the year 12 students laying It recognises all those who served crosses in remembrance. on the home front in Australia, in towns that were attacked by the It was a pleasure to be entertained enemy and those who fought on by the talented All Saints Choir and land, air and sea in battles in the Band before and after the ceremony Coral Sea, New Guinea, including whilst enjoying an opportunity to Milne Bay and Pacific Islands mingle over refreshments. between 1942 and 1945. Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 9 Page 10 Double time Per Ardua 80 candles Pedal to Volunteering and at 99 Ad Astra for Viv the metal activity focus President’s view Implemented to replace the Korean War Memorial Pilot graduation previous Bombing of Darwin I have accepted an invitation to I attended the No 256 Advanced commemoration, the aim was represent the Air Force Association Pilots graduation at Pearce on 6 to encompass a much wider on a committee called to consider a September to present the RAAFA knowledge of the impact the war in proposal to build a State Memorial Trophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Enemies, New Friends: Australia and the Impact of the Pacific War
    Old Enemies, New Friends: Australia and the Impact of the Pacific War Peter Dennis The Second World War, and especially the Pacific War, was a profoundly disturbing experience for Australia. While for the metropolitan imperial centre, the United Kingdom, a ‘Germany first’ strategy against the three Axis powers made eminent sense, as indeed it did for its partners from mid to late 1941, the Soviet Union and the United States, for an outlying country such as Australia, the war posed fundamental questions about its priorities and interests. Well before the fall of Singapore exposed the hollowness of the overarching imperial defence policy centred on the naval base at Singapore, Australia had been increasingly concerned about the threat from Asia, and specifically the threat from Japan. Fear of Asia generally, and, from the mid to late nineteenth century, of Japan specifically, had been a constant thread in Australian considerations of its security and place in the region. Even before the Japanese naval victory over Russia at Tsushima in 1905, Australia fears that its interests were of a lesser order in the minds of imperial policy makers were confirmed by the conclusion of the Anglo-Japanese Alliance of 1902. While this was regarded in British circles as a clever and timely answer to the emergence of Germany as the main threat to the United Kingdom, Australian leaders saw the withdrawal of British naval forces from the Pacific and the acknowledgment of Japan’s primacy in the region as an alarming development. Both the United Kingdom and Japan could point to tangible benefits that flowed from the alliance; Australia could see only a deterioration of its security position and, in the background, a questioning of its relationship with the ‘Mother Country.’1 How could Australian security be assured? One answer, an answer that continues to have resonance in the Australia of the 21st century, was to rely on ‘great and powerful friends’ to come to Australia’s aid in times of crisis.
    [Show full text]