Chemical Biological Defense Program (CBDP)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chemical Biological Defense Program (CBDP) UNCLASSIFIED Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2006/FY 2007 Budget Estimates February 2005 Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Defense-Wide Volume 4 Chemical Biological Defense Program (CBDP) UNCLASSIFIED THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Table of Contents DoD Joint Service Chemical and Biological Defense Program Fiscal Year (FY) 2006-2011 Program and Budget Review TABLE OF CONTENTS i CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM RDT&E OVERVIEW iii R-1 EXHIBIT FOR CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM vii BA1 - BASIC RESEARCH 1 BA2 - APPLIED RESEARCH 43 BA3 - ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT (ATD) 133 BA4 - ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES (ACD&P) 219 BA5 - SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION (SDD) 365 BA6 - RDT&E MGT SUPPORT 545 BA7 - OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 591 i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ii Department of Defense Chemical/Biological Defense Program Overview Fiscal Year (FY) 2006-2007 Budget Estimates The DoD Chemical and Biological (CB) Defense Program is a key part of a comprehensive national strategy to counter the threat of chemical and biological weapons as outlined in the National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction, December 2002. This national strategy is based on three principal pillars: (1) Counterproliferation to Combat WMD Use, (2) Strengthened Nonproliferation to Combat WMD Proliferation, and (3) Consequence Management to Respond to WMD Use. The DoD CB Defense Program (CBDP) provides research, development, and acquisition (RDA) programs primarily to support the first and third pillars. In support of counterproliferation, the DoD CBDP provides passive defenses tailored to the unique characteristics of the various chemical and biological weapons, including emerging threats. These capabilities provide U.S. forces the ability to rapidly and effectively mitigate the effects of a CB attack against our deployed forces. In support of counterproliferation, the DoD CBDP provides capabilities to respond to the effects of WMD use against our forces deployed abroad, and the homeland. In addition, the DoD CBDP supports the "1-4-2-1" force planning construct articulated in the Department of Defense Annual Report to the President and the Congress, September 2002. The CBDP funds research to exploit leading edge technologies to ensure that U.S. forces are equipped with world class capabilities to defend against CB threats through the far term. This budget includes support of a comprehensive science and technology base program to ensure continued advances in CB defense capabilities. CBDP Basic Research provides core capabilities to ensure U.S. technological advantages through the far term, including research into advanced chemical and biological detection systems, advanced materials for improved filtration systems and protection systems, advanced decontaminants, investigations into the environmental fate of chemical warfare agents, advanced information technologies, medical biological defense research (including novel biodefense initiatives that focus on interrupting the disease cycle before and after exposure, as well as addressing the bioengineered threat), diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines for viral, bacterial, toxin, and novel threat agents), and medical chemical defense (including investigations of low level chemical warfare agent exposures, diagnostics, therapeutics, pretreatments for classical chemical warfare threats and novel threat agents). iii The CBDP also supports numerous Defense Technology Objectives (DTOs), which represent the key science and technology base programs for demonstrating advanced capabilities in the near and mid-term. During FY06, DTOs support operational capabilities to Sense (Reconnaissance, Detection and Identification), Shape (Battle Management), Shield (Individual & Collective Protection), and Sustain (Decontamination & Restoration) U.S. forces for passive defense, force protection, and consequence management missions. Among others, DTOs include capabilities for Standoff Biological Aerosol Detection, Wide Area Aerial Reconnaissance for Chemical Agents, Environmental Fate of Agents, Low-Level Chemical Warfare Agent Exposure: Effects and Countermeasures, Detection of CB Contamination on Surfaces, Advanced Air Purification System Model, Chemical and Biological Hazard Environment Prediction and Hazard Prediction with Nowcasting, advanced medical CB prophylaxes, Rapid Detection, Threat Assessment and Attribution of Genetically Engineered Biothreat Organisms Using Microarray-Based Resequencing Technologies, smallpox therapeutics, Multiagent Vaccines for Bio-Warfare Agents, and advanced decontamination capabilities. Technologies currently in advanced development (Budget Activities 4 and 5) provide leading edge tools that will enhance CB defense capabilities for U.S. forces in all CB defense missions in the near-term. As described in the National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction, the response to chemical and biological threats requires tailored approaches that recognize the fundamental differences between chemical and biological weapons (and even the different types of these threats). This budget details the comprehensive array of systems under development essential to support principles of contamination avoidance, protection, and decontamination. iv Key systems in advanced development in FY06 include: the Joint Service Lightweight Standoff Chemical Agent Detector (JSLSCAD) for standoff chemical agent detection, Joint Chemical Agent Detector (JCAD) for portable point chemical agent detection, Joint Effects Model (JEM) and Joint Operational Effects Federation (JOEF) to provide risk management tools to the warfighter, Advanced Concept Technology Demonstrations (Contamination Avoidance at Sea Ports of Debarkation (CASPOD) and Chemical Biological Radiological Nuclear (CBRN) Unmanned Ground Reconnaissance (CUGR)), Joint Service Transportable Decontamination System - Small Scale (JSTDS-SM), Joint Service Sensitive Equipment Decontamination (JSSED), Joint Service Personnel/Skin Decontamination System (JSPDS), Advanced Anticonvulsant System, Plasma and Recombinant Bioscavenger, Improved Nerve Agent Treatment System (INATS), biological defense vaccines (including recombinant botulinum toxin vaccine, equine encephalitis vaccines, plague vaccine and ricin vaccine) as part of the Joint Vaccine Acquisition Program (JVAP), Critical Reagents Program (CRP) to support development of reagents for biological detection and diagnostic systems, Joint Biological Point Detection System (JBPDS), Joint Service Chemical/Biological Agent Water Monitor (JCBAWM), Non-Traditional Agent (NTA) Detection Improvement Program, Joint Biological Standoff Detection System (JBSDS) Increment II, Joint Biological Agent Identification and Diagnostic System (JBAIDS) Increment II, Joint Warning and Reporting Network (JWARN), Joint Collective Protection Equipment (JCPE), Joint Expeditionary Collective Protection, and Joint Service Aircrew Mask (JSAM). In FY06, the CBDP will start or continue procurement on a variety of CB defense systems intended to provide U.S. forces with the best available equipment to survive, fight, and win in CB contaminated environments. Systems beginning procurement in FY06 include JSAM, Multi-Service Radiacs (MSR), and Joint Service Transportable Decontamination System - Small Scale (JSTDS-SM). Systems continuing procurement in FY06 include the Joint Effects Model (JEM), Joint Protective Aircrew Ensemble (JPACE), Joint Service General Purpose Mask (JSGPM), JWARN, JBAIDS, Joint Service Mask Leakage Tester (JSMLT), Joint Service Lightweight Integrated Suit Technology (JSLIST), the NBC Reconnaissance Vehicle (NBCRV), Joint Service Light NBC Reconnaissance System (JSLNBCRS), JCAD, JSLSCAD, JBPDS, biological defense vaccines (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed), CB Protective Shelters (CBPS), and chemical and biological defense equipment for installation force protection. v The FY06 program continues to support the consequence management (CM) mission. CM projects fund the development of the Unified Command Suite (UCS) and Analytical Laboratory System (ALS) Block upgrades. CM funding provides for the modernization to address objective operational capabilities for the National Guard WMD Civil Support Teams (CSTs), the Reserve Component (RC) Reconnaissance, and RC Decontamination Teams. It provides full funding for: (1) type-classified protection, detection, and training equipment; (2) development and fielding of upgraded analytical platforms for the detection, identification, and characterization of chemical, biological, and radiological agents used by terrorists in a civilian environment; (3) development and fielding of communication capabilities that are interoperable with other federal, state, and local agencies; (4) testing and evaluation to ensure that the systems fielded are safe and effective; and (5) program management funds. Overall, the FY 2006 President's Budget achieves a structured, executable, and integrated medical and non-medical joint CB Defense Program that balances urgent short-term procurement needs that include securing the homeland from terrorist attack, and long-term S&T efforts to mitigate future CB attacks. The two primary areas of increased emphasis in this year's budget are the CB Defense Program's test and evaluation infrastructure and novel biodefense initiatives. The budget improves our biological and chemical research labs infrastructure/ability to address known and emerging threats. It also adds funding for novel biodefense initiatives
Recommended publications
  • Potential Applicability of Assembled Chemical Weapons Assessment Technologies to RCRA Waste Streams and Contaminated Media EPA 542-R-00-004 August 2000
    United States Solid Waste and EPA 542-R-00-004 Environmental Protection Emergency Response August 2000 Agency (5102G) www.epa.gov clu-in.org EPA Potential Applicability of Assembled Chemical Weapons Assessment Technologies to RCRA Waste Streams and Contaminated Media EPA 542-R-00-004 August 2000 POTENTIAL APPLICABILITY OF ASSEMBLED CHEMICAL WEAPONS ASSESSMENT TECHNOLOGIES TO RCRA WASTE STREAMS AND CONTAMINATED MEDIA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Technology Innovation Office Washington, DC 20460 Potential Applicability of ACWA Technologies to RCRA Waste Streams and Contaminated Media NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER This document was prepared by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Technology Innovation Office with support under EPA Contract Number 68-W-99-003. It is intended to raise the awareness of the technologies included in the Assembled Chemical Weapons Assessment (ACWA) program, and presents an overview of each technology, including its applicability, performance, and other factors. Information about the technologies was obtained from the technology providers. No testing or evaluation was conducted by EPA during preparation of this document, and an independent assessment of this information was beyond EPA’s scope. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. For more information about this project, please contact: John Kingscott, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Technology Innovation Office, Ariel Rios Building, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. (MS 5102G), Washington, D.C., 20460; (703) 603-7189; e-mail: [email protected]. This document may be obtained from EPA’s web site at www.epa.gov/tio, or at clu-in.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Nerve Agent - Lntellipedia Page 1 Of9 Doc ID : 6637155 (U) Nerve Agent
    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of MILLIONS of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com Nerve Agent - lntellipedia Page 1 of9 Doc ID : 6637155 (U) Nerve Agent UNCLASSIFIED From lntellipedia Nerve Agents (also known as nerve gases, though these chemicals are liquid at room temperature) are a class of phosphorus-containing organic chemicals (organophosphates) that disrupt the mechanism by which nerves transfer messages to organs. The disruption is caused by blocking acetylcholinesterase, an enzyme that normally relaxes the activity of acetylcholine, a neurotransmitter. ...--------- --- -·---- - --- -·-- --- --- Contents • 1 Overview • 2 Biological Effects • 2.1 Mechanism of Action • 2.2 Antidotes • 3 Classes • 3.1 G-Series • 3.2 V-Series • 3.3 Novichok Agents • 3.4 Insecticides • 4 History • 4.1 The Discovery ofNerve Agents • 4.2 The Nazi Mass Production ofTabun • 4.3 Nerve Agents in Nazi Germany • 4.4 The Secret Gets Out • 4.5 Since World War II • 4.6 Ocean Disposal of Chemical Weapons • 5 Popular Culture • 6 References and External Links --------------- ----·-- - Overview As chemical weapons, they are classified as weapons of mass destruction by the United Nations according to UN Resolution 687, and their production and stockpiling was outlawed by the Chemical Weapons Convention of 1993; the Chemical Weapons Convention officially took effect on April 291997. Poisoning by a nerve agent leads to contraction of pupils, profuse salivation, convulsions, involuntary urination and defecation, and eventual death by asphyxiation as control is lost over respiratory muscles.
    [Show full text]
  • Warning: the Following Lecture Contains Graphic Images
    What the новичок (Novichok)? Why Chemical Warfare Agents Are More Relevant Than Ever Matt Sztajnkrycer, MD PHD Professor of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic Medical Toxicologist, Minnesota Poison Control System Medical Director, RFD Chemical Assessment Team @NoobieMatt #ITLS2018 Disclosures In accordance with the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) Standards, the American Nurses Credentialing Center’s Commission (ANCC) and the Commission on Accreditation for Pre-Hospital Continuing Education (CAPCE), states presenters must disclose the existence of significant financial interests in or relationships with manufacturers or commercial products that may have a direct interest in the subject matter of the presentation, and relationships with the commercial supporter of this CME activity. The presenter does not consider that it will influence their presentation. Dr. Sztajnkrycer does not have a significant financial relationship to report. Dr. Sztajnkrycer is on the Editorial Board of International Trauma Life Support. Specific CW Agents Classes of Chemical Agents: The Big 5 The “A” List Pulmonary Agents Phosgene Oxime, Chlorine Vesicants Mustard, Phosgene Blood Agents CN Nerve Agents G, V, Novel, T Incapacitating Agents Thinking Outside the Box - An Abbreviated List Ammonia Fluorine Chlorine Acrylonitrile Hydrogen Sulfide Phosphine Methyl Isocyanate Dibotane Hydrogen Selenide Allyl Alcohol Sulfur Dioxide TDI Acrolein Nitric Acid Arsine Hydrazine Compound 1080/1081 Nitrogen Dioxide Tetramine (TETS) Ethylene Oxide Chlorine Leaks Phosphine Chlorine Common Toxic Industrial Chemical (“TIC”). Why use it in war/terror? Chlorine Density of 3.21 g/L. Heavier than air (1.28 g/L) sinks. Concentrates in low-lying areas. Like basements and underground bunkers. Reacts with water: Hypochlorous acid (HClO) Hydrochloric acid (HCl).
    [Show full text]
  • Soman Is a Human-Made Chemical Warfare Agent Classified As a Nerve Agent
    District Health Department #2 Soman Fact Sheet RCP-AP-06l SOMAN WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW What is Soman? Soman is a human-made chemical warfare agent classified as a nerve agent. Nerve agents are the most toxic and rapidly acting of known chemical warfare agents. Soman is a tasteless, odorless, clear liquid with a slight camphor odor (similar to vapor rub). How Can People Be Exposed to Soman? Following a release of Soman into the air, people can be exposed through skin contact, eye contact, or inhalation. Soman also mixes easily with water so it is possible that it could be used as a poison through the water. What Are The Symptoms of Soman? Individuals who are exposed to a low or moderate dose of soman by inhalation, ingestion, or skin absorption may experience some or all of the following symptoms within seconds to a few hours after exposure: runny nose, watery eyes, small pupils, eye pain, blurred vision, drooling and excessive sweating, cough, chest tightness, rapid breathing, diarrhea, increased urination, confusion, drowsiness, weakness, headache, nausea/vomiting, slow or fast heart rate, and abnormally high or low blood pressure. A large dose of Soman may lead to loss of consciousness, convulsions, paralysis, and respiratory failure leading to death. What are the Long-term Effects of Soman Exposure? Mild or moderately exposed people usually recover completely. Severely exposed people are not likely to survive. Can Soman Be Treated? Treatment consists of removing Soman as soon as possible and providing supportive medical care in a hospital setting. Antidotes are available for Soman.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy of the Repon1 Mutant IIG1 to Prevent Cyclosarin Toxicity in Vivo and to Detoxify Structurally Different Nerve Agents in Vitro
    Arch Toxicol (2014) 88:1257–1266 DOI 10.1007/s00204-014-1204-z MOLECULAR TOXICOLOGY Efficacy of the rePON1 mutant IIG1 to prevent cyclosarin toxicity in vivo and to detoxify structurally different nerve agents in vitro Franz Worek · Thomas Seeger · Moshe Goldsmith · Yacov Ashani · Haim Leader · Joel S. Sussman · Dan Tawfik · Horst Thiermann · Timo Wille Received: 30 September 2013 / Accepted: 16 January 2014 / Published online: 30 January 2014 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014 Abstract The potent human toxicity of organophos- alkylmethylfluorophosphonates but had low efficiency with phorus (OP) nerve agents calls for the development of the phosphoramidate tabun and was virtually ineffective effective antidotes. Standard treatment for nerve agent with the nerve agent VX. This quantitative analysis vali- poisoning with atropine and an oxime has a limited effi- dated the model for predicting in vivo protection by cata- cacy. An alternative approach is the development of cata- lytic bioscavengers based on their catalytic efficiency, the lytic bioscavengers using OP-hydrolyzing enzymes such level of circulating enzyme, and the dose of the intoxicat- as paraoxonases (PON1). Recently, a chimeric PON1 ing nerve agent. The in vitro and in vivo results indicate mutant, IIG1, was engineered toward the hydrolysis of the that IIG1 may be considered as a promising candidate toxic isomers of soman and cyclosarin with high in vitro bioscavenger to protect against the toxic effects of a range catalytic efficiency. In order to investigate the suitabil- of highly toxic nerve agents. ity of IIG1 as a catalytic bioscavenger, an in vivo guinea pig model was established to determine the protective Keywords Nerve agents · Paraoxonase · Mutant · effect of IIG1 against the highly toxic nerve agent cyclo- Detoxification · Protection · Bioscavenger sarin.
    [Show full text]
  • Converting Former Soviet Chemical Weapons Plants
    Jonathan B. Tucker ince Russia possesses the world’s largest stockpile This essay lays out a brief history of the CWPF con- of chemical weapons (CW)—a declared total of version issue and the contending U.S. and Russian posi- S40,000 metric tons—Russian ratification and tions. It then suggests a compromise approach based on implementation of the 1993 Chemical Weapons Conven- industrial joint ventures that would enable Moscow to tion (CWC) will be critical to the success of the global convert its former CWPFs in an economic manner, while chemical disarmament and non- satisfying the concerns of proliferation regime. To date, the United States and other however, Moscow’s ratification VIEWPOINT: countries that conversion be has been delayed by political, irreversible and verifiable. economic, and environmental CONVERTING FORMER concerns associated with CW CW PRODUCTION destruction and the conversion SOVIET CHEMICAL ACTIVITIES of former Soviet chemical weapon production facilities WEAPONS PLANTS Before, during, and after (CWPFs) to legitimate com- World War II, the Soviet by Jonathan B. Tucker mercial activities.1 Union produced many tens of thousands of tons of chemi- Whereas American CWPFs cal weapons (both blister were all single-purpose military facilities that have lain and nerve agents) at multiple facilities, most of them in dormant for years, former Soviet CWPFs are integrated the Volga River basin.4 On April 10, 1987, President into large civilian chemical production complexes and Mikhail Gorbachev declared that the Soviet Union would share the same industrial infrastructure. For example, sev- henceforth cease all development and production of CW eral buildings that once produced nerve agents are em- agents.
    [Show full text]
  • VX Binary (VX2) – Developed by the US • Novichok Agent
    THE FOUR LIKELY BINARY AGENTS Working paper Charles P. Blair Last Updated, January 2013 Binary sarin (GB2) – developed by the U.S. Binary soman (GD2) VX binary (VX2) – developed by the U.S Novichok agent (“New Comer) –developed by the Soviets Additionally, Eric Croddy has written that VNSAs may use “binarytype designs” in an attack…with simple designs most likely using common chemical ingredients (e . g. , c ya n id e . ) ” 1 Aum is an example o f t h is . 1. Binary sarin . With binary sarin (also referred to as “GB binary” and “GB2”) a forward container has methylphosphonic difluoride (DF), while a second, rear container has an isopropyl alcohol and isopropylamine solution (OPA). The DF resides in the munition prior to use. The OPA is added just prior to launch. After deployment of the weapon, the two canisters rupture, “the isopropyl amine binds to the hydrogen fluoride generated during the chemical reaction, and the chemical mixture produces GB.”2 Experts note that, “The final product of the weapon is of the same chemical structure as the original nerve agent. The term binary refers only to the storage and deployment method used, not to the chemical structure of the substance.”3 With regard to how long it takes the DF and OPA to mix before binary sarin is extant, Eric Croddy notes that, “as in any chemical reaction, a certain amount of time is required for the [binary] reaction to run its course. In the case of GB binary, this required about seven seconds.”4 2. Binary soman (also referred to as “GD binary” and “GD2”).
    [Show full text]
  • Nerve Agents (Ga, Gb, Gd, Vx) Tabun (Ga) Cas # 77-81-6 Sarin (Gb) Cas # 107-44-8 Soman (Gd) Cas # 96-64-0 Vx Cas # 50782-69-9
    NERVE AGENTS (GA, GB, GD, VX) TABUN (GA) CAS # 77-81-6 SARIN (GB) CAS # 107-44-8 SOMAN (GD) CAS # 96-64-0 VX CAS # 50782-69-9 Division of Toxicology ToxFAQsTM April 2002 This fact sheet answers the most frequently asked health questions (FAQs) about nerve agents. For more information, call the ATSDR Information Center at 1-888-422-8737. This fact sheet is one in a series of summaries about hazardous substances and their health effects. It is important you understand this information because this substance may harm you. The effects of exposure to any hazardous substance depend on the dose, the duration, how you are exposed, personal traits and habits, and whether other chemicals are present. HIGHLIGHTS: Exposure to nerve agents can occur due to accidental release from a military storage facility. Nerve agents are highly toxic regardless of the route of exposure. Exposure to nerve agents can cause tightness of the chest, excessive salivation, abdominal cramps, diarrhea, blurred vision, tremors, and death. Nerve agents (GA, GB, GD, VX) have been identified at 5 of the 1,585 National Priorities List sites identified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). What are nerve agents GA, GB, GD, and VX? ‘ GA, GB, GD, and VX will be broken down in water quickly, but small amounts may evaporate. Nerve agents GA(tabun), GB (sarin), GD(soman), and VX are ‘ GA, GB, GD, and VX will be broken down in moist soil manufactured compounds. The G-type agents are clear, quickly. Small amounts may evaporate into air or travel colorless, tasteless liquids miscible in water and most below the soil surface and contaminate groundwater.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyclosarin (GF) Team (NRT) Quick Reference Guides (Qrgs) for Chemical Warfare Agents
    NRT Quick Reference Guide: For references, please see Key References Cited/Used in National Response Cyclosarin (GF) Team (NRT) Quick Reference Guides (QRGs) for Chemical Warfare Agents. [January 2015 Update] QRGs are intended for Federal OSC/RPMs. Agent Classification: Schedule 1 Chemical Warfare Nerve Agent; CAS: 329-99-7; Formula: C7H14FO2P; Molecular Weight: 180.2 g/mol. Description: Colorless liquid, generally odorless. GF is a lethal cholinesterase inhibitor with a mechanism of toxicity similar to organophosphate insecticides, though it is much more potent. Environmental breakdown products of GF, including methylphosphonic acid (MPA), are relatively non-toxic. Other breakdown products include fluoride ion, which may exist as hydrofluoric acid (HF) depending on the pH. GF can react violently with strong oxidizers and may decompose when in contact with metals, evolving flammable hydrogen gas. GF is combustible but not easily ignited when heated; GF vapors can form explosive mixtures with air. Persistence: GF is considered a “moderately low persistent” chemical warfare agent. Vapor: minutes to hours; liquid: hours to days. Persistence will depend upon amount and purity of the agent, method of release, environmental conditions, and the types of surfaces and materials impacted. Porous, permeable, organic or polymeric materials such as carpets and vinyl tiles can accumulate agent by sorbing GF vapors and liquids, acting as “sinks,” thereby prolonging persistence. Physical properties are listed at/near STP unless otherwise indicated. Conversion Factors: ppm = mg/m3 x 0.1357; mg/m3 = ppm x 7.370 Vapor Vapor Volatility Boiling Point Freezing Flash Point Liquid Density Aqueous Solubility Non-aqueous Solubility Agent Characteristics Agent Density Pressure Point 6.2 (air = 1) 0.044 mm Hg 580 mg/m3 462°F/239°C -22°F/-30°C 201°F/94°C 1.13 g/mL Insoluble in H2O Common solvents, alcohols, (77°F/25°C) (77°F/25°C) (68°F/20°C) gasoline, oils, fats AIR RELEASE SCENARIOS ARE ASSUMED MOST PROBABLE; HOWEVER, OTHER RELEASE SCENARIOS AND EXPOSURE ROUTES SHOULD BE CONSIDERED.
    [Show full text]
  • VX Gas Fact Sheet RCP-AP-06N
    District Health Department #2 VX Gas Fact Sheet RCP-AP-06n VX GAS WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW What is VX Gas? VX Gas is a human-made chemical warfare agent classified as a nerve agent. Nerve agents are the most toxic and rapidly acting of known chemical warfare agents. VX Gas is a tasteless, odorless, clear liquid with a slight camphor odor (similar to vapor rub). How Can People Be Exposed to VX Gas? Following a release of VX Gas into the air, people can be exposed through skin contact, eye contact, or inhalation. VX Gas also mixes easily with water so it is possible that it could be used as a poison through the water. What Are The Symptoms of VX Gas? Individuals who are exposed to a low or moderate dose of VX Gas by inhalation, ingestion, or skin absorption may experience some or all of the following symptoms within seconds to a few hours after exposure: runny nose, watery eyes, small pupils, eye pain, blurred vision, drooling and excessive sweating, cough, chest tightness, rapid breathing, diarrhea, increased urination, confusion, drowsiness, weakness, headache, nausea/vomiting, slow or fast heart rate, and abnormally high or low blood pressure. A large dose of VX Gas may lead to loss of consciousness, convulsions, paralysis, and respiratory failure leading to death. What are the Long-term Effects of VX Gas Exposure? Mild or moderately exposed people usually recover completely. Severely exposed people are not likely to survive. Can VX Gas Be Treated? Treatment consists of removing VX Gas as soon as possible and providing supportive medical care in a hospital setting.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Adsorption of A-Series Chemical Warfare Agents on Graphdiyne Nanoflake; a DFT Study
    Effective Adsorption of a-series Chemical Warfare Agents on Graphdiyne Nanoake; A DFT Study Hasnain Sajid COMSATS Institute of Information Technology - Abbottabad Campus Sidra Khan COMSATS Institute of Information Technology - Abbottabad Campus Khurshid Ayub COMSATS Institute of Information Technology - Abbottabad Campus Tariq Mahmood ( [email protected] ) COMSATS Institute of Information Technology - Abbottabad Campus https://orcid.org/0000-0001- 8850-9992 Research Article Keywords: Graphdiyne nanoake, Chemical warfare agents, DFT, QTAIM, SAPT, RDG Posted Date: February 10th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-209734/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Version of Record: A version of this preprint was published at Journal of Molecular Modeling on April 1st, 2021. See the published version at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-021-04730-3. Effective adsorption of A-series chemical warfare agents on graphdiyne nanoflake; a DFT study Hasnain Sajid#, Sidra Khan#, Khurshid Ayub, Tariq Mahmood* Department of Chemistry, COMSATS University, Abbottabad Campus, Abbottabad-22060, Pakistan *To whom correspondence can be addressed: E-mail: [email protected] (T. M) # Hasnain Sajid & Sidra Khan have equal contributions for first authorship 1 Abstract Chemical warfare agents (CWAs) are highly poisonous and their presence may cause diverse effect not only on living organisms but on environment as well. Therefore, their detection and removal in a short time span is very important. In this regard, here the utility of graphdiyne (GDY) nanoflake is studied theoretically as an electrochemical sensor material for the hazardous CWAs including A-230, A-232, A-234.
    [Show full text]
  • Differentiating Nerve Agent Poisoning from Opioid Poisoning – Clinical Signs, Detection and Diagnostics
    SANITÄTSDIENST DIFFERENTIATING NERVE AGENT POISONING FROM OPIOID POISONING – CLINICAL SIGNS, DETECTION AND DIAGNOSTICS PD Dr. Timo Wille LtCol (MC) German Armed Forces Bundeswehr Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology Disclosures Presenter’s has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Disclosure will be made when a product is discussed for an unapproved use. This continuing education activity is managed and accredited by AffinityCE in collaboration with AMSUS. AffinityCE and AMSUS staff as well as Planners and Reviewers, have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Commercial Support was not received for this activity Objectives • List clinical signs of nerve agent and opioid poisoning • Know that highly potent opioids might be misused as chemical weapon • Know on-site devices for diagnosis of opioid and nerve agent poisoning NERVE AGENTS – RELEVANCE Tabun (GA) Sarin (GB) Soman (GD) Cyclosarin (GF) Salisbury / Amesbury 2018: one death, min. four injured Kuala Lumpur 2017: one death Syria 2013-2017: thousands dead and injured Halabja 1988: 5.000 deaths, 10.000 injured VX Novichok? 5 S a n i t ä t s d i e n s MECHANt ISM OF NERVE AGENT POISONING – INHIBITION OF ACETYLCHOLINESTERASE Physiology: Pathophysiology: Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) cleaves Binding of OP to AChE, renders the enzyme inactive acetylcholine in acetate and choline and ACh overflow at muscarinic and nicotinic synapses terminates its action as a neurotransmitter muscarinic nicotinic cns diarrhea muscle fasciculations seizures
    [Show full text]