U.S Policy and the Collapse of the Soviet Union

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

U.S Policy and the Collapse of the Soviet Union U.S Policy and the Collapse of the Soviet Union Hanne Amundsen Master Thesis Department of Literature, Area Studies and European Languages, Faculty of Humanities UNIVERSITY OF OSLO FALL 2017 II III Copyright © Hanne Amundsen 2017 U.S. Policy and the Collapse of the Soviet Union. Hanne Amundsen http://www.duo.uio.no/ Print: Reprosentralen, University of Oslo IV Abstract This thesis examines whether the United States played a significant role in the collapse of the Soviet Union. It is focused around three factors which presumably may have played a role in the demise of the USSR. The first factor concerns the unintended consequences of the Helsinki accords. The Helsinki accords were signed in 1975 by thirty-five countries, including the Soviet Union and the United States. The final basket of the agreement, which would become known as the Final Act, called for the signatory countries to improve and respect basic human rights principles. When the USSR did not adhere to these principles, it led to a continuous pressure from the U.S. to improve human rights conditions. I examine whether this pressure had any effect on the Soviet leadership’s choice of policies, especially in regard to separatism in the republics. The second factor concerns the announcement of Ronald Reagan to develop the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), a space-based shield able to intercept incoming missiles. This thesis examines whether the Soviet leadership began to increase their nuclear capacity as a response to SDI, further undermining their economy leading to its collapse. The third, and final factor focuses on the Soviet defense burden, and whether the arms race with the United States during the Cold War played a role in the Soviet collapse by severely straining the Soviet economy. The method used to approach these factors have been to consult memoirs, autobiographies and diaries of central Soviet politicians and people working in the military-industrial complex to provide a Soviet point-of-view of the relevant questions I have asked. Additionally, I have made use of available online archive material. By consulting these types of sources, I have been able to get an insight into how the Soviet leadership approached these issues at top-level meetings with the United States. Upon examining these sources, it has become clear that the United States’ role in the collapse of the Soviet Union was at most minimal. I have argued that the Soviet economy collapsed from its own intrinsic causes, and that SDI did not lead to increases in Soviet military spending. I have further argued that the minimal role the U.S. played in the Soviet collapse can be seen through its role of pushing forward liberal reforms in the USSR by constantly reminding the Soviet leadership of the principles they agreed to in Helsinki in 1975. V VI VII Acknowledgments The idea behind this thesis came during a study-abroad semester in St.Petersburg in the spring of 2016. I asked one of my professors, Dmitriy Goncharov, about ideas for a research paper which I later could use as a springboard for my master thesis. He suggested “international factors in the collapse of the Soviet Union”, which subsequently led me to writing this thesis. I would therefore first and foremost like to thank professor Dmitriy Goncharov at Higher School of Economics in St.Petersburg for the exiting idea behind this thesis. I further wish to thank the following: My supervisor, Pål Kolstø, for your guidance, support and constructive inputs during the entire process. I would not have been able to finish this thesis without your help. Sing In Ng, for reading the entire thesis and for helping me out when I have been knocking my head against the wall. Robert Bergh, Arne-Kristian Amundsen, Euan Wallace Crowe and Line Lund Norbakk for taking the time out to proofread excerpts from the thesis. Last, but not least, my better half, Henrik Grimshei. Thank you for your endless love and support and for sticking out with me during the entire process. You truly are my hero. VIII Transliteration Russian proper names have been transliterated to Latin letters by using the BGN/PCGN 1947 system1: А а: a Б б: b В в: v Г г: g Д д: d Е е: e or ye Ё ё: ë or yë Ж ж: zh З з: z И и: i Й й: y К к: k Л л: l М м: m Н н: n О о: o 1 U.S. Board on Geographic Names. Foreign Names Committee Staff, “Romanization Systems and Roman- Script Spelling Conventions”, 93-94. IX П п: p Р р: r С с: s Т т: t У у: u Ф ф: f Х х: kh Ц ц: ts Ч ч: ch Ш ш: sh Щ щ: shch Ъ ъ: " Ы ы: y Ь ь: ´ Э э: e Ю ю: yu Я я: ya I have followed this system with one exception. In the case of Mikhail Gorbachev, I have transliterated his last name in accordance with the common spelling, Gorbachev, not Gorbachëv. X XI Table of contents List of figures…………………………………………………………………………...xiii 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Research Questions and Thesis Outline ...................................................................... 2 1.2 U.S. Policy and the Demise of the Soviet Union: The Debate .................................... 4 1.2.1 The role of human rights ...................................................................................... 4 1.2.2 The role of the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) ............................................... 6 1.2.3 The role of the defense burden ............................................................................. 8 1.2.4 Other theories on U.S. role in the Soviet collapse ............................................... 9 1.3 Method and Sources .................................................................................................. 10 2 The Helsinki Accords of 1975 ......................................................................................... 15 2.1 Background ................................................................................................................ 15 2.2 Unintended Consequences ......................................................................................... 18 2.2.1 Human rights in Soviet-U.S. relations pre-Gorbachev ...................................... 18 2.2.2 Enter Gorbachev: Human rights in Soviet-U.S. relations .................................. 22 2.2.3 The Baltic case in Soviet-U.S. relations ............................................................. 27 2.3 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 33 3 The Soviet Defense Burden and the Strategic Defense Initiative (“Star Wars”) ............. 37 3.1 Background ................................................................................................................ 37 3.2 The Burden of Defense Becomes Evident ................................................................. 39 3.3 A New Dilemma Arises: The Strategic Defense Initiative........................................ 44 3.3.1 Ronald Reagan and the Strategic Defense Initiative .......................................... 45 3.3.2 Soviet reactions 1983-1985 ................................................................................ 49 3.3.3 Soviet reactions under Gorbachev ...................................................................... 53 3.4 Did U.S. Military Buildup in the 1980s Increase the Soviet Military Budget? ......... 61 3.4.1 The priority for defense changes ........................................................................ 65 3.4.2 Another strain on the defense burden? The Soviet answer to “Star Wars” ........ 68 3.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 71 4 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 76 Literature .................................................................................................................................. 83 XII List of figures Figure 1………………………………………………………………………………………40 Figure 2………………………………………………………………………………………63 Figure 3………………………………………………………………………………………63 XIII XIV 1 Introduction In the beginning of the 1990s, the world stood as witnesses as the previously great superpower, the Soviet Union, disintegrated and eventually collapsed. The Soviet Union no longer existed, but was split up into fifteen independent successor states across the Eurasian map. Despite these enormous changes, which have been claimed to be the final ending of the Cold War, the Soviet Union disintegrated peacefully. Explanations of these events have been of central concern to social scientists and historians, and the reforms and domestic policy of Mikhail Gorbachev have been the most emphasized factors in this research. However, because of the competitive environment during the Cold War between the Soviet Union and the United States, some scholars have raised the question whether the Soviet collapse can be attributed to Western policies. One of these was Alexander Dallin. A year after the Soviet collapse he presented in his article “Causes of the Collapse of the USSR2” three hypotheses for possible Western influences on the demise of the Soviet Union: In regard to explicit policy by Western powers, it is impossible to find direct evidence of its destabilizing impact on Soviet society or polity, though at least three factors can be assumed to have played some role: (1) the unintended consequences of the inclusion of “Basket 3” (on human rights) in the Helsinki accords
Recommended publications
  • Conde, Jonathan (2018) an Examination of Lithuania's Partisan War Versus the Soviet Union and Attempts to Resist Sovietisation
    Conde, Jonathan (2018) An Examination of Lithuania’s Partisan War Versus the Soviet Union and Attempts to Resist Sovietisation. Masters thesis, York St John University. Downloaded from: http://ray.yorksj.ac.uk/id/eprint/3522/ Research at York St John (RaY) is an institutional repository. It supports the principles of open access by making the research outputs of the University available in digital form. Copyright of the items stored in RaY reside with the authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full text items free of charge, and may download a copy for private study or non-commercial research. For further reuse terms, see licence terms governing individual outputs. Institutional Repository Policy Statement RaY Research at the University of York St John For more information please contact RaY at [email protected] An Examination of Lithuania’s Partisan War Versus the Soviet Union and Attempts to Resist Sovietisation. Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Research MA History at York St John University School of Humanities, Religion & Philosophy by Jonathan William Conde Student Number: 090002177 April 2018 I confirm that the work submitted is my own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the works of others. This copy has been submitted on the understanding that it is copyright material. Any reuse must comply with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 and any licence under which this copy is released. @2018 York St John University and Jonathan William Conde The right of Jonathan William Conde to be identified as the Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 Acknowledgments My gratitude for assisting with this project must go to my wife, her parents, wider family, and friends in Lithuania, and all the people of interest who I interviewed between the autumn of 2014 and winter 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Yelena Bonner—A Commanding Voice for Human Rights & Heroic Figure for Karabagh Armenians Passes Away
    ZORYAN INSTITUTE OF CANADA, INC. PRESS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Patil Halajian DATE: June 23, 2011 Tel: 416-250-9807 Yelena Bonner—a Commanding Voice for Human Rights & Heroic Figure for Karabagh Armenians Passes Away Armenians mourn the loss of Yelena Bonner, a great humanist, and a leading combatant against the injustices of the Soviet era. She will forever remain relevant and inspirational to people worldwide, and to Armenians particularly, because of her forceful advocacy on behalf of the people of Karabagh. Yelena Bonner, the wife of Andrei Sakharov, the Soviet Union's most prominent dissident scientist, and developer of Russia‟s first hydrogen bomb, was co-founder the Moscow Helsinki Group in the 1970s. By relentlessly challenging state oppression, it quickly became the most active rights group in the entire movement. The organization‟s mission was to publicize Soviet violations of the Helsinki Accord signed in 1975, recognizing Soviet hegemony in photo by Mikhail Lemkhin return for assurance of fundamental freedoms and human rights guarantees. Throughout her lifetime, Ms. Bonner lent her voice to many causes. She spoke very passionately on the human rights violations committed by Azerbaijan in Karabagh and virtually from the onset of the national liberation movement there, she defended the right of the Armenian nation to self-determination. She did so from the highest platforms, calling international attention to the issue. Among her public appearances was a lecture on “Nationalities in the Soviet Union: Possible Solutions within the Framework of a Revised Constitution,” which she made under the auspices of the Zoryan Institute and the Amnesty International Group of Harvard Law School in 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Jewry (8) Box: 24
    Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Digital Library Collections This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections. Collection: Green, Max: Files Folder Title: Soviet Jewry (8) Box: 24 To see more digitized collections visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected] Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/ Page 3 PmBOMBR.S OP CONSCIBNCB J YLADDllll UPSIDTZ ARRESTED: January 8, 1986 CHARGE: Anti-Soviet Slander DATE OF TRIAL: March 19, 1986 SENTENCE: 3 Years Labor Camp PRISON: ALBXBI KAGAllIIC ARRESTED: March 14, 1986 CHARGE: Illegal Possession of Drugs DATE OF TRIAL: SENTENCE: PRISON: UCHR P. O. 123/1 Tbltsi Georgian, SSR, USSR ALEXEI llUR.ZHBNICO (RE)ARRBSTBD: June 1, 1985 (Imprisoned 1970-1984) CHARGE: Parole Violations DA TB OF TRIAL: SENTENCE: PRISON: URP 10 4, 45/183 Ulitza Parkomienko 13 Kiev 50, USSR KAR.IC NBPOllNIASHCHY .ARRESTED: October 12, 1984 CHARGE: Defaming the Soviet State DA TB OF TRIAL: January 31, 1985 SENTENCE: 3 Years Labor Camp PRISON: 04-8578 2/22, Simferopol 333000, Krimskaya Oblast, USSR BETZALBL SHALOLASHVILLI ARRESTED: March 14, 1986 CHARGE: Evading Mllltary Service DA TE OF TRIAL: SENTENCE: PRISON: L ~ f UNION OF COUNCILS FOR SOVIET JEWS 1'411 K STREET, NW • SUITE '402 • WASHINGTON, DC 2<XX>5 • (202)393-44117 Page 4 PIUSONB'R.S OP CONSCIBNCB LBV SHBPBR ARRESTED:
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights and History a Challenge for Education
    edited by Rainer Huhle HUMAN RIGHTS AND HISTORY A CHALLENGE FOR EDUCATION edited by Rainer Huhle H UMAN The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Genocide Convention of 1948 were promulgated as an unequivocal R response to the crimes committed under National Socialism. Human rights thus served as a universal response to concrete IGHTS historical experiences of injustice, which remains valid to the present day. As such, the Universal Declaration and the Genocide Convention serve as a key link between human rights education and historical learning. AND This volume elucidates the debates surrounding the historical development of human rights after 1945. The authors exam- H ine a number of specific human rights, including the prohibition of discrimination, freedom of opinion, the right to asylum ISTORY and the prohibition of slavery and forced labor, to consider how different historical experiences and legal traditions shaped their formulation. Through the examples of Latin America and the former Soviet Union, they explore the connections · A CHALLENGE FOR EDUCATION between human rights movements and human rights education. Finally, they address current challenges in human rights education to elucidate the role of historical experience in education. ISBN-13: 978-3-9810631-9-6 © Foundation “Remembrance, Responsibility and Future” Stiftung “Erinnerung, Verantwortung und Zukunft” Lindenstraße 20–25 10969 Berlin Germany Tel +49 (0) 30 25 92 97- 0 Fax +49 (0) 30 25 92 -11 [email protected] www.stiftung-evz.de Editor: Rainer Huhle Translation and Revision: Patricia Szobar Coordination: Christa Meyer Proofreading: Julia Brooks and Steffi Arendsee Typesetting and Design: dakato…design. David Sernau Printing: FATA Morgana Verlag ISBN-13: 978-3-9810631-9-6 Berlin, February 2010 Photo Credits: Cover page, left: Stèphane Hessel at the conference “Rights, that make us Human Beings” in Nuremberg, November 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2 25 Years After the 1989 Revolutions: Time for Reflection on Unfinished Business a Seminar, October 3-5, 2014, Warsaw
    25 Years After 1989: Reflections on Unfinished Revolutions Page 61 Appendix 2 25 Years After the 1989 Revolutions: Time for Reflection on Unfinished Business A Seminar, October 3-5, 2014, Warsaw, Poland Seminar Statement As one reflects twenty-five years after the Revolutions of 1989 in Eastern Europe and the subsequent collapse of the Soviet Union, it is obvious that a great deal was left unfinished. Indeed, today, we are witnessing an attempt to reverse some of the fundamental outcomes of that transformation. Yet, even before the most recent events, it was clear that the larger promise and hopes of the 1989-91 transformations remained unfulfilled. The political, economic, and social deficits are more obvious in most republics of the former Soviet Union, but they are also notable in East Central European, Baltic, and Balkan countries, which continue to face serious challenges remaining from the legacy of the communist period. All of these factors are significant as the world confronts a revisionist Russian Federation seeking to reassert its domi- nance over the region. The Institute for Democracy in Eastern Europe (IDEE) believes that the twenty-fifth anniversary of the events of 1989 provides an opportunity to analyze what oc- curred, to assess the different outcomes across the region, and to develop ideas and strategies for taking on the unfinished business of that era. To do that, IDEE is organizing a focused seminar gathering democratic activists who helped bring about the 1989-91 revolutions and took part in the region’s transition to address these issues. IDEE has drawn participants for the seminar from the community of activists it has worked with over more than three decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Rfe/Ri. Inc. Broadcast Archive Daily
    RFE/RI. INC. DAILY BROADCAT RL- QuAci-ct,v) BROADCAST ARCHIVE ANALYSES 9g6 ickA4 a JAN vAK/ RADIO FREE EUROPE RADIO UBERTY RADIO LIBERTY DAILY BROADCAST ANALYSIS RUSSIAN SERVICE (For a summary of the news coverage used by the Russian Service please see the end of the DBA.) (An * next to a program indicates designated for translation.) Russian Daily Broadcast Analysis Wednesday, 1 January 1986 D. Felton A. USSR TOPICS -- POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, AND CULTURAL: 1. Soviet-US Relations. STARTING THE DAY (Voznesenskaya, M 5) recalled the case of American schoolgirl Samantha Smith, who was invited to the USSR after having written a letter to the Kremlin asking why the Soviet leaders were threatening the world with war and who was killed last August in an air crash. The program spoke of a propaganda maneuver by the USSR, and said that while she might have been a source of irritation upon returning home, like other pacifists in the West she was not subjected to any persecution, in contrast to pacifists in such countries as the USSR and the GDR. Commenting on an article in Pionengmya Pravda suggesting that the air crash could have been the work of "enemies" who saw Samantha Smith as an "agent of Moscow," the program said the international declaration of children's rights describes instilling in children a hatred of other peoples as a crime and cited the Bible that those whom miskod children should have a millstone tied around their neck and be thrown into the sea. 2. Dissidents and Human Rights. In HUMAN RIGHTS (Alexeyeva, NY 20), a RERUN from December 26, veteran human rights activist Lyudmila Alexeyeva commented on the deteriorating human rights situation in the USSR in 1985.
    [Show full text]
  • Norwegian Helsinki Committee Annual Report 2012 Annual Report 2012
    Norwegian Helsinki Committee Annual Report 2012 Annual Report 2012 Norwegian Helsinki Committee Established in 1977 The Norwegian Helsinki Committee (NHC) is a non-governmental organisation that works to promote respect for human rights, nationally and internationally. Its work is based on the conviction that documentation and active promotion of human rights by civil society is needed for states to secure human rights, at home and in other countries. NHC bases its work on international human rights instruments adopted by the United Nations, the Council of Europe, the Organisation of Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), including the 1975 Helsinki Final Act. The main areas of focus for the NHC are the countries of Europe, North America and Central Asia. The NHC works irrespective of ideology or political system in these countries and maintains political neutrality. How wE work Human rigHts monitoring and reporting Through monitoring and reporting on problematic human rights situations in specific countries, the NHC sheds light on violations of human rights. The NHC places particular emphasis on civil and political rights, including the fundamental freedoms of expression, belief, association and assembly. On-site research and close co-operation with key civil society actors are our main working methods. The NHC has expertise in election observation and has sent numerous observer missions to elections over the last two decades. support of democratic processes By sharing knowledge and with financial assistance, the NHC supports local initiatives for the promotion of an independent civil society and public institutions as well as a free media. A civil society that functions well is a precondition for the development of democracy education and information Through education and information about democracy and human rights, international law and multicultural understanding, we work to increase the focus on human rights violations.
    [Show full text]
  • NONVIOLENT RESISTANCE in LITHUANIA a Story of Peaceful Liberation
    NONVIOLENT RESISTANCE IN LITHUANIA A Story of Peaceful Liberation Grazina Miniotaite The Albert Einstein Institution www.aeinstein.org 2 CONTENTS Acknowledgments Introduction Chapter 1: Nonviolent Resistance Against Russification in the Nineteenth Century The Goals of Tsarism in Lithuania The Failure of Colonization The Struggle for the Freedom of Religion The Struggle for Lithuanian Press and Education Chapter 2: Resistance to Soviet Rule, 1940–1987 An Overview Postwar Resistance The Struggle for the Freedom of Faith The Struggle for Human and National Rights The Role of Lithuanian Exiles Chapter 3: The Rebirth From Perestroika to the Independence Movement Test of Fortitude The Triumph of Sajudis Chapter 4: Towards Independence The Struggle for Constitutional Change Civil Disobedience Step by Step The Rise of Reactionary Opposition Chapter 5: The Struggle for International Recognition The Declaration of Independence Independence Buttressed: the Battle of Laws First Signs of International Recognition The Economic Blockade The January Events Nonviolent Action in the January Events International Reaction 3 Chapter 6: Towards Civilian-Based Defense Resistance to the “Creeping Occupation” Elements of Civilian-Based Defense From Nonviolent Resistance to Organized Civilian-Based Defense The Development of Security and Defense Policy in Lithuania since 1992 Concluding Remarks Appendix I Appeal to Lithuanian Youth by the Supreme Council of the Republic of Lithuania Appendix II Republic in Danger! Appendix III Appeal by the Government of the Republic
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 1984, No.36
    www.ukrweekly.com Published by the Ukrainian National Association Inc.. a fraternal non-profit association| rainian Weekly Vol. Lll No. 36 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 2,1984 "^ ^ffints Canadian government approves grants totalling 5100,000 for famine projects by Mykhailo Bodurldw will be based on interviews with wit­ nesses and survivors of the Ukrainian TORONTO - The Canadian Go- famine. It will also include excerpts ^rnment announced on Friday, Au- from a one-hour interview with Mal­ g^t 17, that it has approved two grants colm Muggeridge, the British journalist fdiatling 5100,000, for research projects and author who was the Moscow cor­ into the Great Famine in Ukraine (1932- respondent for the Manchester Guar­ 33). dian during the time of the famine. The announcement was made at a The film, "Harvest of Despair," is press conference and awards ceremony scheduled to premiere this coming fall by Jesse Flis, the member of Parliament in Toronto. for the Toronto ...riding of Parkdale- Editing and production aspects of the High Park. The grants, each worth film are being coordinated by Ukrai­ 550,000, were awarded to the Toronto- nian film producers, Slavko Nowytski based Ukrainian Famine Research and Jurij Luhovij. Committee and the Foundation to The Lachine-based Foundation to Commemorate the 1933 Ukraine Fa­ Commemorate the 1933 Ukraine Fa­ mine, which is headquartered in La- mine has earmarked its grant for the chine, Que. production costs of a project to record As part of its "Educational Materials on videotape the personal experiences Project on the Ukrainian Holocaust," of Canadian citizens who survived the the Ukrainian Famine Research Com­ Ukrainian famine.
    [Show full text]
  • WHAT PRICE LITHUANIAN INDEPENDENCE? By
    NOT FOR WITHOUT WRITER'SPUBLICATIOICONSENT INSTITUTE OF CURRENT WORLD ILN AFEAIRS Vilnius Lithuania April ii, 1990 WHAT PRICE LITHUANIAN INDEPENDENCE? by Ina Navazelskis Saturday, March 31, was a beautiful spring day in Vilnius. The sun shone; a gusty, warm breeze blew. People were out shopping or strolling along Gediminas Prospect, Vilnius' central boulevard. Life looked normal. It was, however,-far from that. It was on this balmy spring day that Mikhail Gorbachev delivered his most stinging written rebuke yet to the Lithuanian leadership. Almost three weeks to the day after the Lithuanians declared independence, Gorbachev warned of "grave consequences" if the Lithuanian parliament refused to revoke all the laws, declarations, resolutions and appeals that it had passed in the interim. Gorbachev's primary target, of course, was the declaration of independence itself, or as the Lithuanians call it, the "reestablishment" of the independent statehood of Lithuania. The Lithuanians have been calling for negotiations with Moscow ever since they passed this act on March ii. Gorbachev now stipulated he would sit down at the negotiating table only if the Lithuanians [evoked it. "The current Lithuanian leadership is not listening to the voice of reason, Gorbachev' s ultimatum to the Lithuanian Parliament began. It was totally ignoring the decisions of the extraordinary third session of the Soviet People's Congress held in mid-March (which condemned all the Lithuanian moves) and was "carrying out actions which conflict with the Constitution of the Soviet Union, and which, in the view of the entire Union, are openly provocational and insulting." Ins Navszelskis, a journalist, hes written extensively about East European and Soviet ffairs.
    [Show full text]
  • CSCE Testimonies Jaakko Iloniemi / Finland Jiří Opršal / Czechoslovakia Jacques Andreani / France
    CSCE Testimonies Jaakko Iloniemi / Finland Jiří Opršal / Czechoslovakia Jacques Andreani / France Edouard Brunner / Switzerland Peter Steglich / GDR Mario Michele Alessi / Italy 1972–1989 CSCE Oral History Project / Occasional Paper – 2013 Evarist Saliba / Malta Yuri V. Dubinin / Soviet Union Spencer Oliver / USA CSCE Testimonies Time line 1990–2012 Organization for Security and 1972–1989 CSCE Oral History Project Time line 1972 –1991 Q Bodies no longer in existence Co-operation in Europe Causes and Consequences of the Helsinki Final Act QThe “Helsinki process” Qx CSCE/OSCE Institutions QPreparatory Meetings to Follow-up Qx Follow-up meetings 1972–1989 Meetings Q Summit meetings QFollow-up Meetings Q Ministerial Councils QVenues of a politico-military nature Q Economic and Environmental Forum QVenues concerning economic and environmental issues Q Permanent Council Venues concerning Human Dimension discussions Q Q humanitarian issues Politico-Militray negotiations Q Venues concerning the CSCE Q Q Activites with Mediterranean Mediterranean region and Asian Partners for cooperation OSCE Prague Office Archives CSCE OralCSCE History Oral Project History / Occasional Project 2013 Paper – 2013 CSCE Testimonies Causes and Consequences of the Helsinki Final Act 1972–1989 Published by the Prague Offi ce of the OSCE Secretariat náměstí Pod Kaštany 2 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic Compiled by Alice Němcová © OSCE 2013 All rights reserved. Written contents of this publication may be used freely and copied for educational and other non-commercial purposes provided that such usage and reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE Prague Offi ce Archives as the source ISBN 978-92-9235-018-5 Design & Layout: © Jan Dvořák/HQ Kontakt Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • LORD PLUMB, President of the European Parliament. — This Is a Most Unusual Event from Parliament's Point of View
    LORD PLUMB, President of the European Parliament. — This is a most unusual event from Parliament's point of view. It is the Sakharov Prize for freedom of thought awarded to the late Mr Marchenko and Mr Nelson Mandela. The initiative to create an annual human rights prize to enable this Parliament to pay tribute to those individuals who fight, often with their lives, for the values we hold most dear was launched some four years ago. At that time we felt that one particular individual Andrei Sakharov, then in internal exile in Gorky with his wife, Yelena Bonner, repre- sented in a very special way the fight for freedom of ideas and of expression. The award we are conferring today for the first time became known as the Sakharov Prize for freedom of thought. The resolution which we adopted in Parliament on 13 December 1985 provided that it should be awarded to an individual or an organization who had contributed to the development of East-West relations in the con- text of the Helsinki Final Act and, in particular, the Third Basket thereof; cooperation in humanitarian and other fields. Secondly, the safeguarding of the principle of free scientific inquiry and thirdly the def- ence of human rights and respect for international law and the practice of governments in relation to the let- ter of their Constitutions. Much to my personal regret, since I saw him in Moscow on a visit not long ago, Dr Sakharov is not able to be with us today. I know he is with us in spirit.
    [Show full text]