The Limits of U.S.-Czechoslovak Relations from Munich to War

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Limits of U.S.-Czechoslovak Relations from Munich to War America, An Aloof Friend The Limits of U.S.-Czechoslovak Relations from Munich to War By Connor Schonta A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Liberty University 2018 Table of Contents Introduction – 1 Chapter One: “Realization” – 20 Chapter Two: “Consolidation” – 56 Chapter Three: “Occupation” – 99 Chapter Four: “Documentation” – 130 Conclusion – 174 Bibliography – 184 Introduction “There are times when Europe can seem alarmingly big, and two people alarmingly small.”1 It was fall 1938. George F. Kennan, a diplomat at the American legation in Prague, was moving into a new apartment with his wife, Annelise. Europe was at a crossroads, mostly because Adolf Hitler, chancellor of Germany, was snatching up territories he felt belonged to the Reich. He had already gotten Austria, and he now wanted parts of Czechoslovakia. Consequently, Prague, Czechoslovakia’s capital city, became the center of the world’s attention, as chaos and war threatened to swallow central Europe whole. The United States, though having a diplomatic presence in Czechoslovakia, made sure to stay out of Europe’s newest crisis. The administration of President Franklin Roosevelt was intent on remaining neutral to a European imbroglio. Thus, Kennan and his wife, along with all the other Americans working in Prague, could only watch the events transpire, contemplating their relative smallness in light of Europe’s big—immense—problems. Such feelings—that is, one’s smallness in the face of Europe’s sheer complexity—would continue to figure prominently into America’s relationship with Czechoslovakia over the next eleven months, and altogether, they aptly represent the peculiarities of U.S.-Czechoslovak diplomacy in the year leading up to World War II. It was from the Schonborn palace and its 127 rooms that America’s diplomats to Czechoslovakia carried out their daily work. Located in Prague’s historic Mala Strana district, the palace is situated just a few hundred meters west of the capital’s great waterway, the Vltava River. The Schonborn’s initial buildings were constructed in the wake of the Thirty Years’ War, 1 George F. Kennan, Unpublished Memoirs, “Part II: Prague—Munich to Occupation,” 1939, George Kennan Papers, Department of Rare Books and Special Collections, Princeton University Library, 14. 1 and by the twentieth century it held great historical value to the public.2 With vast rooms, extensive gardens, and ornate architecture, it procured fond memories, and not the least bit of awe, from its American inhabitants. And despite the tumultuous events of 1938 and 1939, the palace’s terraced garden always offered “silence and serenity” to those who needed it. From the Schonborn, one could catch sight of both the Hrad and the Charles Bridge, worthy reminders of Prague’s enduring democracy and international flare. When the crises of September 1938 had reached a frightening pitch, and after wives and children had been sent out of the country, the American legation staff hunkered down in the palace together, outfitting a few of its rooms to something akin to school dormitories.3 In the months following Munich, it was primarily from the Schonborn that America’s diplomats observed Czechoslovakia’s neighbors, most of all Hitler’s Germany, squeeze the life from the embattled state, and with it, the special bond that had long personified U.S.-Czechoslovak relations. From 1918 to 1938, the United States and Czechoslovakia shared unique, friendly diplomatic relations, or what some even called “special” relations.4 Circumstances changed drastically in 1938 as a result of the Munich Agreement and its aftermath, and more broadly speaking as a result of Hitler’s foreign policy. While grounded in shared history and common values, the U.S.-Czechoslovak connection that existed prior to World War II was often implicit 2 Richard Crane, the first American diplomat to Czechoslovakia, purchased the palace in 1919 and sold it to the U.S. government in 1925. National Archives and Records Administration (hereafter NARA), Record Group (hereafter RG) 59, 124.60F1/348; The Schonborn had even been classified as a national monument. In a 1930 report on the palace, the American inspectors made sure to point out that the Schonborn was much more beautiful than the British, French, and Italian legation buildings. NARA, RG 59, 124.60F/283.5. 3 Kennan, “Memoirs Part II,” 7. The Hrad, or Prague Castle, is the presidential castle in Prague. The Charles Bridge is a major pedestrian thoroughfare and tourist epicenter. 4 This sentiment was expressed in a number of capacities, both official and unofficial, but a good example is a message sent by Wilbur Carr, American minister to Czechoslovakia, just a few days before he closed the U.S. embassy in March 1939. Wanting the United States to provide relief to Czech refuges, Carr cited the “special situation” that existed between the two countries, noting Washington and Prague’s long history of reciprocal friendliness, and how the United States even served as the model to which Czechoslovakia always looked. Carr to Hull, March 19, 1939, Foreign Relations of the United States (hereafter FRUS), 1939, General, Vol. I, 50. 2 and exaggerated. During the twenty years of Czechoslovakia’s First Republic, though, it hardly mattered whether the bond was perceived or tangible, as circumstances in the world held to a state which, for all its hardships, allowed Washington and Prague to maintain normal relations without having to question the actual value of their friendly relationship. It was not until fall 1938 that the efficacy of the two countries’ relations were put to the test, and they did not fare well. Where did the special bond come from? Much of it came as a result of Czechoslovakia’s independence movement, and the role played by the United States therein. The notion that the United States, and specifically President Woodrow Wilson, fought hard on behalf of Czechoslovakia to secure the former’s independence is not true, or it is at last too simple of an explanation. Wilson’s commitment to liberalism and ‘self-determination,’ which in itself is an endlessly complex idea, did not necessarily extend to granting recognition to central Europe’s various ethnic groups, and he preferred that Austria-Hungary outlive the war. It was only when this possibility lost all tenability that Czechoslovakia and the successor states, essentially through fait accompli, earned Wilson’s blessing.5 That being said, America’s eventual support of an independent Czechoslovakia, which became formalized in November 1918, was crucial to the Czechoslovak cause. As one of the tantamount figures of the Paris Peace Conference, Wilson, and by extension the United States, was a necessary factor in legitimizing Czechoslovakia’s right to exist and guaranteeing her borders.6 5 For a thorough unpacking of Wilson’s ideas of self-determination and his role in creating the postwar order, see Trygve Throntveit, “The Fable of the Fourteen Points: Woodrow Wilson and National Self- Determination,” Diplomatic History 35, no. 3 (2011): 445-481. 6 For an appraisal of Czechoslovakia’s drive toward independence, including American involvement, see Vera Olivova, The Doomed Democracy: Czechoslovakia in a Disrupted Europe, 1914-1938 (Montreal: McGill- Queen’s University Press, 1972), 52-100. 3 As would become a trend in U.S.-Czechoslovak relations, it was the efforts and eagerness displayed by Czechoslovaks toward Americans that proved most important in establishing the special bond. As mentioned, Wilson and most other leaders did not seriously consider the national aspirations of Czechs and Slovaks until the end of the war when other options had failed.7 On the other hand, Czech leaders, zealous for Habsburg dissolution and autonomy for their people, actively campaigned for independence. The most central figure in the Czechoslovak struggle for independence, and by extension the most important person to the development of a U.S.-Czechoslovak bond, was Tomas Masaryk. Long an admirer of American democracy, Masaryk’s ties to the United States turned personal when he married an American, Charlotte Garrigue, in 1878. They moved to Prague, where Masaryk had taken a university professorship, and while there Masaryk became an important voice in Czech politics. The couple made frequent trips to the United States, allowing Masaryk to mingle with influential American circles and float ideas of Czech autonomy.8 Toward the end of the war, Masaryk, who at that point was still drumming up support for an independent state for Czechs and Slovaks, moved to the United States and established a base of operations in Washington D.C. where he gained Wilson’s ear.9 In May 1918 in Pittsburgh, delegations of expatriate Czechs and Slovaks drafted the Pittsburgh Agreement, which declared the intent of the two groups to establish a unified Czechoslovakia. Five months later, on October 17, Masaryk provided the State Department with a draft of the Czechoslovak declaration of independence. The following day, Czechoslovakia published its declaration of independence 7 Victor Mamatey, “The Establishment of the Republic,” in A History of the Czechoslovak Republic, 1918- 1948, eds. Victor Mamatey & Radomir Luza (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1973), 20-22. 8 Paul Selver, Masaryk: A Biography (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1975), 285-293. 9 For a thorough account of Masaryk’s efforts in America, see Josef Kalvoda, “Masaryk in America in 1918,” Jahrbucher fur Geschichte Osteuropas 27, no. 1 (1979): 85-99. 4 from Paris, and just a short time later, Prague’s National Committee issued its first law declaring that the Czechoslovak state “has come into being.”10 Efforts, however tempered or calculated, came from the American side, too. In early October, Secretary of State Robert Lansing publically stated U.S. support of Czech and Slovak independence.11 Later, in the midst of the Czechs preparing their declaration, Wilson indicated that he no longer intended to ‘save’ the Habsburg monarchy and gave mention to Czechoslovak autonomy.
Recommended publications
  • Hitler's Speech to the Reichstag, 1 September 1939
    Hitler's Speech to the Reichstag, 1 September 1939 ...If I call the Wehrmacht, if I now demand the German people to sacrifice, and if necessary, I demand to sacrifice everything, I have the right to do so. Because I am ready today, as I did in the past, to bring any personal sacrifice, I do not demand of any German man to do anything I was not prepared to do myself for four years. There should be no deprivation in Germany that I will not share. My entire life belongs from this moment on to my people. I want nothing else now than to be the first soldier of the German Reich. I have now put on the same uniform that was once my dearest and holiest. I will only take it off after the victory, or else I will not live to see that end. Should something happen to me in this battle, my first successor will be party member Goering. Should something happen to party member Goering, the next in line will be party member Hess. You would then be bound by blind loyalty to them as Fuehrers , as you were to me. Should something happen to party member Hess, I will enact a law that the senate will then elect the worthiest, i.e. the bravest from their midst. As National Socialist and as a German soldier I am going into this battle with a brave heart. My whole life was nothing but one continuous battle for my people, for its renewal, for Germany. This battle was always backed by the faith in this people.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilmerhale's Matthew Martens on Religious Liberty, More Hours and 'Drowning in Email' During COVID-19
    APRIL 23, 2020 WilmerHale’s Matthew Martens on Religious Liberty, More Hours and 'Drowning in Email' During COVID-19 The former SEC litigator discusses Judge Justin Walker’s ruling for a Kentucky church’s Easter services and what happens when your dog interrupts your Zoom client call. BY JACQUELINE THOMSEN Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and The WilmerHale team also Dorr partner Matthew Martens is no helped file acomplaint against stranger to quick turnarounds for Greenville, Mississippi, Mayor Err- religious liberty cases: He once got ick Simmons over an apparent ban a call at 9 p.m. asking for his help on drive-in services there. First Lib- filing a brief by 10 a.m. the next day erty Institute later said in a state- on behalf of a Jewish Chabad orga- ment that officials clarified those nization ahead of Yom Kippur and services are allowed. managed to meet the deadline. Martens spoke from his home in That experience in religious lib- Vienna, Virginia, where he’s stay- erty litigation came to Marten’s ing with his family, about his expe- advantage in recent weeks as he, rience. This has been edited for joined by WilmerHale senior asso- length and clarity. ciate Kevin Gallager and associates Q: You’ve now worked on a cou- Hyun-Soo Lim and Andrew Miller, ple of cases with the First Liberty worked with the First Liberty Insti- Institute, challenging local restric- Matthew Martens of WilmerHale. tute and others to challenge restric- tions on religious services. How did tions to church services during the you get involved in these cases and I’ve worked with First Liberty COVID-19 pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Slovakia's Righteous Among the Nations
    Slovakia’s Righteous among the Nations Gila Fatran Slovak-Jewish relations, an important factor in the rescue of Jews during the Holocaust, were influenced in no small part by events that took place in the latter third of the 19th century. That century saw the national awakening of oppressed nations. The Slovak nation, ruled by the Hungarians for 1,000 years, was struggling at the time for its national existence. The creation of the Austro-Hungarian monarchy led in 1867 to the granting of equal civil rights to the Jews in the empire in the assumption that they would assimilate nationally and culturally into the state. At the same time the Hungarian leaders stepped up their suppression of the Slovak nation. The integration of the Jews into the developing economic and cultural life and the continued improvement in their situation alongside the suppression of the aspirations of the Slovaks, were used by the political and church representatives of the Slovak nation to fan the flames of Jew-hatred and to blame the Jews for the difficult lot of the Slovak People. During this period many Slovak publications also addressed the existence of a “Jewish Question” in a negative sense: blaming the Jews for all of the Slovak society’s ills. During this era, one of the central reasons behind the rise of Slovak antisemitism was the economic factor. At the same time, the slogan “Svoj k svojmu,” which, freely translated, means “Buy only from your own people,” registered a series of “successes” in neighboring countries. However, when nationalists, using this motto, launched a campaign to persuade Slovaks to boycott Jewish-owned shops, their efforts proved unsuccessful.
    [Show full text]
  • Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945
    Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945. T939. 311 rolls. (~A complete list of rolls has been added.) Roll Volumes Dates 1 1-3 January-June, 1910 2 4-5 July-October, 1910 3 6-7 November, 1910-February, 1911 4 8-9 March-June, 1911 5 10-11 July-October, 1911 6 12-13 November, 1911-February, 1912 7 14-15 March-June, 1912 8 16-17 July-October, 1912 9 18-19 November, 1912-February, 1913 10 20-21 March-June, 1913 11 22-23 July-October, 1913 12 24-25 November, 1913-February, 1914 13 26 March-April, 1914 14 27 May-June, 1914 15 28-29 July-October, 1914 16 30-31 November, 1914-February, 1915 17 32 March-April, 1915 18 33 May-June, 1915 19 34-35 July-October, 1915 20 36-37 November, 1915-February, 1916 21 38-39 March-June, 1916 22 40-41 July-October, 1916 23 42-43 November, 1916-February, 1917 24 44 March-April, 1917 25 45 May-June, 1917 26 46 July-August, 1917 27 47 September-October, 1917 28 48 November-December, 1917 29 49-50 Jan. 1-Mar. 15, 1918 30 51-53 Mar. 16-Apr. 30, 1918 31 56-59 June 1-Aug. 15, 1918 32 60-64 Aug. 16-0ct. 31, 1918 33 65-69 Nov. 1', 1918-Jan. 15, 1919 34 70-73 Jan. 16-Mar. 31, 1919 35 74-77 April-May, 1919 36 78-79 June-July, 1919 37 80-81 August-September, 1919 38 82-83 October-November, 1919 39 84-85 December, 1919-January, 1920 40 86-87 February-March, 1920 41 88-89 April-May, 1920 42 90 June, 1920 43 91 July, 1920 44 92 August, 1920 45 93 September, 1920 46 94 October, 1920 47 95-96 November, 1920 48 97-98 December, 1920 49 99-100 Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Kaimin, January 31, 1969 Associated Students of University of Montana
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Associated Students of the University of Montana Montana Kaimin, 1898-present (ASUM) 1-31-1969 Montana Kaimin, January 31, 1969 Associated Students of University of Montana Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/studentnewspaper Recommended Citation Associated Students of University of Montana, "Montana Kaimin, January 31, 1969" (1969). Montana Kaimin, 1898-present. 4562. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/studentnewspaper/4562 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Associated Students of the University of Montana (ASUM) at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Montana Kaimin, 1898-present by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MONTANA KAIMIN AN INDEPENDENT DAILY NEWSPAPER Pentagon to Plan Death of Draft WASHINGTON (AP) — Presi­ and was requested to plan a special dent Nixon has directed the Pen­ commission to develop a detailed tagon to work out a detailed plan plan of action for ending the of action for ending the draft when draft.” Vietnam expenditures can be re­ The White House announcement duced, the White House announced indicated a shift from the position yesterday. President Nixon took during his It was Nixon’s initial step to­ presidential campaign: “That when ward fulfillment of a campaign the war in Vietnam is over the promise to seek an all volunteer draft should be ended.” military establishment. During the campaign, President The instructions sent to Secre­ Nixon said the draft is not an effi­ tary of Defense Melvin R.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberty Media Corporation Owns Interests in a Broad Range of Media, Communications and Entertainment Businesses
    2021 PROXY STATEMENT 2020 ANNUAL REPORT YEARS OF LIBERTY 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 2020 ANNUAL REPORT LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS STOCK PERFORMANCE INVESTMENT SUMMARY PROXY STATEMENT FINANCIAL INFORMATION CORPORATE DATA ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain statements in this Annual Report constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements regarding business, product and marketing plans, strategies and initiatives; future financial performance; demand for live events; new service offerings; renewal of licenses and authorizations; revenue growth and subscriber trends at Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (Sirius XM Holdings); our ownership interest in Sirius XM Holdings; the recoverability of goodwill and other long- lived assets; the performance of our equity affiliates; projected sources and uses of cash; the payment of dividends by Sirius XM Holdings; the impacts of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19); the anticipated non-material impact of certain contingent liabilities related to legal and tax proceedings; and other matters arising in the ordinary course of business. In particular, statements in our “Letter to Shareholders” and under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” contain forward looking statements. Where, in any forward-looking statement, we express an expectation or belief as to future results or events, such expectation or belief
    [Show full text]
  • 8Th Annual Report of the Bank for International Settlements
    BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS EIGHTH ANNUAL REPORT 1st APRIL 1937 —.. 31st MARCH 1938 BASLE 9th May 1938 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction 5 II. Exchange Rates, Price Movements and Foreign Trade , 19 III. From Dehoarding to renewed Hoarding of Gold 37 IV. Capital Movements and International Indebtedness 61 V. Trend of Interest Rates 74 VI. Developments in Central and Commercial Banking 100 VII. Current Activities of the Bank: (1) Operations of the Banking Department . 106 (2) Trustee and agency functions of the Bank 109 (3) Net profits and distribution . 111 (4) Changes in Board of Directors and Executive Officers 112 VIII. Conclusion 114 ANNEXES I. Central banks or other banking institutions possessing right of representation and of voting at the General Meeting of the Bank. II. Balance sheet as at 31st March 1938. III. Profit and Loss Account and Appropriation Account for the financial year ended 31st March 1938. IV. Trustee for the Austrian Government International Loan 1930: (a) Statement of receipts and payments for the seventh loan year (1st July 1936 to 30th June 1937). (b) Statement of funds in the hands of depositaries as at 30th June 1937. V. Trustee for the Austrian Government International Loan 1930 — Interim statement of receipts and payments for the half-year ended 31st December 1937. VI. International Loans for which the Bank is Trustee or Fiscal Agent for the Trustees — Funds on hand as at 31st March 1938. EIGHTH ANNUAL REPORT TO THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF THE BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS Basle, 9th May 1938. Gentlemen : I have the honour to submit to you the Annual Report of the Bank for International Settlements for the eighth financial year, beginning 1st April 1937 and ending 31st March 1938.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kentucky High School Athlete, December 1938 Kentucky High School Athletic Association
    Eastern Kentucky University Encompass The Athlete Kentucky High School Athletic Association 12-1-1938 The Kentucky High School Athlete, December 1938 Kentucky High School Athletic Association Follow this and additional works at: http://encompass.eku.edu/athlete Recommended Citation Kentucky High School Athletic Association, "The Kentucky High School Athlete, December 1938" (1938). The Athlete. Book 401. http://encompass.eku.edu/athlete/401 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Kentucky High School Athletic Association at Encompass. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Athlete by an authorized administrator of Encompass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Slogan of the All~Star Game: "We Play That They May Play, I--..- ·-..- ·-·-·-·-··-·-.. -.. -·--·-·-·-·-·-~.. -.. -.. -··-.. -·-··-..- ·-··-..- .. -..- ·--·l- 1 I i i t I l I I I i• i• i i i i 1, li i ' II ij i i f Supt. John A. Dotson ~ f Eastern Kentuckv's rep r ~senta ti,- e on the Kentucky High School Ath- I 1_ letic Association Board is Pr,gf. john A Dotson. Superintendent of Schools. I 1 Benham. Kentucky. ~- - ~ ( I Com ing to Benham in 1922, · ·P~of. Dolson set about building a school i ! organization which is today one of the most efficient plants in the state. i • T he student body of 800 is housed in a fire-proof. two-story brick structure I I which in cludes modern la boratories. classrooms. and the third la rgest hig h I ! school libra ry in lhe state o f Kentucky among hi g h schools of m embersh ip 1 I of 200 to 500.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Producers Book Finalists
    PRODUCERS BOOK & PRINT SOURCE LIST Pre-Festival Edition THE 2017 PRODUCERS BOOK A LETTER FROM THE SCREENPLAY & FILM COMPETITION DIRECTORS Hello! Each year, we prepare our annual Producers Book which contains loglines and contact information for the year’s top scripts in our various Script Competitions. Please feel free to reach out to any of the writers listed here to request a copy of their scripts. Also included is our Print Source List containing information for all films selected for the 2017 Festival. This year’s Semifinalists and Finalists were chosen from a field of 9,487 scripts entered in our Screenplay, Digital Series, Playwriting, and Fiction Podcast Competitions. Each year we are amazed by the professional quality and talent that we receive and this year wasn’t any different. The Competition is open to feature-length scripts in the genres of drama, comedy, sci-fi, and horror; teleplay pilots and specs, short scripts, stage plays, fiction podcast scripts, and digital series scripts. Year after year, our strive in programming the Austin Film Festival film slate is to discover and champion the writers and those who can translate amazing stories to the screen. We received over 5,000 film submissions this year and had the task of whittling it down to 182 films that embody our mission and passion for storytelling. It was a harrowing task, but it led to our strongest year of film yet. We’re so proud of this year’s diverse group of filmmakers and unique voices and can’t wait for these works to be seen, shared, and loved.
    [Show full text]
  • Aftermath: Accounting for the Holocaust in the Czech Republic
    Aftermath: Accounting for the Holocaust in the Czech Republic Krista Hegburg Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERISTY 2013 © 2013 Krista Hegburg All rights reserved Abstract Aftermath: Accounting for the Holocaust in the Czech Republic Krista Hegburg Reparations are often theorized in the vein of juridical accountability: victims of historical injustices call states to account for their suffering; states, in a gesture that marks a restoration of the rule of law, acknowledge and repair these wrongs via financial compensation. But as reparations projects intersect with a consolidation of liberalism that, in the postsocialist Czech Republic, increasingly hinges on a politics of recognition, reparations concomitantly interpellate minority subjects as such, instantiating their precarious inclusion into the body po litic in a way that vexes the both the historical justice and contemporary recognition reparatory projects seek. This dissertation analyzes claims made by Czech Romani Holocaust survivors in reparations programs, the social work apparatus through which they pursued their claims, and the often contradictory demands of the complex legal structures that have governed eligibility for reparations since the immediate aftermath of the war, and argues for an ethnographic examination of the forms of discrepant reciprocity and commensuration that underpin, and often foreclose, attempts to account for the Holocaust in contemporary Europe. Table of Contents Acknowledgments ii Introduction 1 Chapter 1 18 Recognitions Chapter 2 74 The Veracious Voice: Gypsiology, Historiography, and the Unknown Holocaust Chapter 3 121 Reparations Politics, Czech Style: Law, the Camp, Sovereignty Chapter 4 176 “The Law is Such as It Is” Conclusion 198 The Obligation to Receive Bibliography 202 Appendix I 221 i Acknowledgments I have acquired many debts over the course of researching and writing this dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Czechoslovak-Polish Relations 1918-1968: the Prospects for Mutual Support in the Case of Revolt
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1977 Czechoslovak-Polish relations 1918-1968: The prospects for mutual support in the case of revolt Stephen Edward Medvec The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Medvec, Stephen Edward, "Czechoslovak-Polish relations 1918-1968: The prospects for mutual support in the case of revolt" (1977). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5197. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5197 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CZECHOSLOVAK-POLISH RELATIONS, 191(3-1968: THE PROSPECTS FOR MUTUAL SUPPORT IN THE CASE OF REVOLT By Stephen E. Medvec B. A. , University of Montana,. 1972. Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1977 Approved by: ^ .'■\4 i Chairman, Board of Examiners raduat'e School Date UMI Number: EP40661 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • Decrees and the Czech Restitution Laws from a Human Rights and European Community Law Perspective
    The Beneš-Decrees and the Czech Restitution Laws from a Human Rights and European Community Law Perspective Konrad Biihler, Gregor Schusterschitz and Michael Wimmer' I. Introduction In the years preceding the accession of the Czech Republic to the European Union on 1 May 2004, the discussion of the so-called Benes-Decrees and the expulsion of the Sudeten Germans from the former Czechoslovakia intensified not only in the Czech Republic, Germany and Austria, but also on the European level. The EC Commis- sion and the European Parliament have repeatedly dealt with this topic throughout the preparation of the accession. They have instructed their respective legal departments to examine the compatibility of the Decrees and the relevant restitution laws with the political accession criteria and Community law. The Commission appointed a group of experts who discussed open questions in collaboration with Czech government representatives and submitted its conclusions on 14 October 2001.2 The Parliament commissioned the international lawyers Frowein, Bernitz and Lord Kingsland to prepare an external legal opinion. Their conclusions were pub- lished on 2 October 20021, and formed the basis for the Parliament's opinion on the 1 The authors are employees of the Austrian Ministry for Foreign Affairs. This contribution is based on the results of research for a legal opinion issued in June 2002. It solely reflects the authors' personal views. The authors thank Jakob Wurm (University of Vienna) for translating the contribution as it was published in the �sterreichisches Jahrbuch für Inter- nationale Politik (2002), 15, and Eva-Marie Russek for her help.
    [Show full text]