DOCSLIB.ORG

THE NEW CANON LAW a Commentary and Summary of the New Code of Canon Law by Rev. STANISLAUS WOYWOD, O.F.M. with a Preface by Righ

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE NEW CANON LAW a Commentary and Summary of the New Code of Canon Law by Rev. STANISLAUS WOYWOD, O.F.M. with a Preface by Righ THE NEW CANON LAW A Commentary and Summary of the New Code of Canon Law By Rev. STANISLAUS WOYWOD, O.F.M. With a Preface by Right Rev. Mgr. PHILIP BERNARDINI, J.U.D. Professor of Canon Law at the Catholic University, Washington New Edition, Augmented by Recent Decrees and Declarations YORK JOSEPH F. WAGNER (Inc.) LONDON: B. HERDER FR. BENEDICT BOEING, O.F.M. FR. BENEVENUTUS RYAN, O.F.M. Swprimi FR. EDWARD BLECKE, O.F.M. Minister Provincialis JULY 1, 1918 ARTHUR J. SCANLAN, S.T.D. Censor Librorum ^Imprimatur *fr JOHN CARDINAL FARLEY Archbishop of New York NEW YORK, JULY 3, 1918 Copyright, 1918, by JOSEPH F. WAGNER, Xew York PREFACE For several months past the articles by Father Stanislaus Woywod in the Ecclesiastical Review have informed the clergy of the most important features of the new Code of Canon Law. The same author now gives to the public a Summary and Commentary of the whole Code. As the present volume is published mainly with a view of the needs of the clergy engaged in the care of souls, the bulk of the book has been kept as compact as possible; wherefore in such places only where explanation and comment seemed neces sary they have been given, and in as brief a form as possible. Chapters which are not needed by every priest have been mentioned only with few words and en passant, as it were. The fourth and the fifth Book have been summed up very briefly, giving the most important points of legislation con tained therein. A very complete Index will make it easy to find any desired point of law. We heartily congratulate Father Woywod on the good work and trust that the clergy of the United States will be pleased to find in this volume a welcome means of acquiring the necessary knowledge of the new legislation of the Church. Dr. PHILIP BERNARDINI Professor of Canon Law at the Catholic University Washington, D. C. INTRODUCTION When on May the twenty-seventh, 1917, a new* Codex Juris Canonici was promulgated by Papal Bull, this memorable event marked the happy conclusion of a revision of the Code of Law for the Catholic Church which had taken thirteen years of the most painstaking work on the part of a large number of erudite scholars and specialists in Canon Law. The new Code is truly a monumental work, the magnitude of which will be apparent when thought is given to the truly gigantic task of revising and coordinating all the existing Church laws, including the laws of all ages since the times of the primitive Church, eliminating all those that have dropped out of use, or that have been revoked or suspended in the course of the centuries. Never before in the history of the Church was such a compilation on the same im mense scope attempted. During the Middle Ages various Popes caused official collections made of laws that had been enacted within a limited period of years, but never before was the entire legislation of the Church unified and codified as it has now been done in the new Codex. The Papal Bull decreed that the new book of law was to go into effect on Whitsunday, May the nineteenth, 1918. The period of time allowed before a new law after its official promulgation goes into force is known in the terminology of Canon Law as the vacatio legis. Canonists have generally held that for all laws pro mulgated by the Holy See two months time is granted before in places outside the City of Rome the obligation of observing the law begins. For very remote countries even a longer time has been conceded, in order to let the knowledge of the law become sufficiently disseminated to make its enforcement possible. In more recent times the Holy See has in important laws frequently specified the period of the vacatio legis, as for instance in the case of the decree Ne Tenure which was published about eight months before it was to be enforced. The general principle, however, valid in civil law as well as in Canon Law, is that it is the duty of subjects to keep themselves informed through the ordinary channels of information, as, for instance, official magazines and papers, what laws, amendments, decisions, etc., have been enacted vi THE NEW CANON LAW by the authorities. It is not necessary, hence, that the bishop an nounce to his clergy the laws and regulations passed by the su preme authority of the Church, nor can it be said that this is his duty, though for uniformity of action on part of the clergy of a diocese it is advantageous that the bishop announce to his priests the important new laws with direction to make them known on one and the same day to the people throughout the diocese. The purpose of the new Codex is, to supersede all existing collections of papal laws, whether contained in the various official compilations published with the special approval of former Popes, or in the volumes of decrees and declarations published by the various Roman Congregations, or, finally, in the many exist ing private collections of papal laws. Only in those instances in which the new Code expressly declares that a former law on a specified subject is to be retained, are former laws to continue in force. Instances of this kind are discussed in the course of the present volume. The benefit of the new Code is inestimable, and it will go far toward unifying and strengthening the activities of the Church, by effecting a more uniform course of action in all the important details of the Church s life. Let no one, however, labor under the impression that the Code means the legislation of the Supreme Head of the Catholic Church has now come to an end. An or ganization like the Catholic Church, living and laboring in the great, wide world, and guiding millions of people of all races in the way of truth, must needs adapt her work to the ever-changing conditions of peoples and times. The present Code, therefore, is not, and cannot be, the final law in all and everything, for, in as much as Canon Law is the regulation of the activities of the Church, and since these activities are changing and developing with the gradual progress of civilization, new amendments, deci sions, declarations concerning the meaning of some of the laws, and exceptions and particular regulations to fit the exceptional conditions of particular countries or dioceses, must naturally be expected. The Holy Father has, however, provided (Motu Pro- prio, Sept. 15, 1917; Ada Ap. Sed. f vol. IX, pag. 483) that any and all new laws, as well as the possible repeal of some Canons of the new Code, also any interpretative declarations, etc., issued either by the Supreme Pontiff himself or by one of the Sacred Congregations, shall be turned over to a committee whose duty it will be to formulate the new laws, etc,, into Canons, and to insert INTRODUCTION vn them in the Code in their proper places, so that the Code may for all times remain the one, authoritative and complete lawbook of the Church. The canonist will note the difference in the arrangement of matter in the new Code from the order followed in former collec tions of Canon Law. Previous collections were, as a rule, divided into five books, in the order of : judex, judicium, clems, connubia, crimen, whereas the five books of the present Code are : Lib. I., Normae generates; Lib. II., De Personis; Lib. III., De Rebus; Lib. IV., De Processibus; Lib. V., De Delictis et Poenis. Refer ence to the laws has been made easy by short Canons, or para graphs, numbered consecutively from beginning to end of the Code, two thousand four hundred and fourteen Canons in all, so that the number of the Canon suffices to enable one to find a cer tain law, no matter in what book, or under what title, this law may be placed. The purpose of our present volume on the new Code is, mainly, to give the clergy engaged in parish work in a handy volume all that which is of practical importance for them in their daily life, in the exercise of their sacred duties that must be guided by the laws of our Holy Mother Church. Prolonged dis cussion and lengthy comparison with former law, such as might appeal to the student who has no other duties but his studies to attend to, are avoided in this volume. Such discussion and com parison will find proper place in a complete and thorough Com mentary on the Code which the author has under consideration for future publication. In arranging the subject-matter of this book we have faith fully adhered to the order of the new Code, in deference to the Holy Father s desire that no one introduce an arrangement differ ing from the Code. THE AUTHOR. On the Feast of St. Bonaventure, D.S., July 14, 1918. CONTENTS PAGE PREFACE "i INTRODUCTION , v THE FIRST BOOK: GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF CANON LAW.. I Title I Principles of Ecclesiastical Laws 3 Title II Customs 7 Title III Manner of Reckoning Time 8 Title IV Rescripts 10 Title V Privileges 13 Title VI Dispensations 15 THE SECOND BOOK: LAWS CONCERNING PERSONS 17 PART I : LAWS CONCERNING THE CLERGY Section I The Clergy in General 22 Title I Manner of Ascribing the Clergy to a Diocese 22 Title II The Rights and Privileges of Clerics 23 Title III Obligations of Clerics 25 Title IV Ecclesiastical Offices 29 Title V Ordinary and Delegated Jurisdiction 30 Title VI Reduction of Clerics to the State of the Laity 34 Section II Clerics Individually 35 Title VII The Supreme Authority and Those who by Law Share in it 36 Chapter I The Roman Pontiff 36 Chapter II The General Council 37 Chapter III The Cardinals of the Holy Roman Church 38 Chapter IV The Roman Curia 41 Article I The Roman Congregations 42 Article II The Tribunals of the Roman Curia 46 Article III Offices of the Roman Curia 46 Chapter V Legates of the Roman Pontiff 47 Chapter VI Patriarchs, Primates, Metropolitans 48 Chapter VII Plenary and Provincial Councils 49 Chapter VIII Vicars and Prefects Apostolic 51 Chapter IX Administrators Apostolic 51 Chapter X Inferior Prelates 52 Title VIII Episcopal Jurisdiction and Participants of the Same 53 Chapter I Bishops 53 Chapter II Coadjutors and Auxiliary Bishops 59 Chapter III The Diocesan Synod 61 Chapter IV The Diocesan Curia 62 Article I The Vicar General 63 Article II The Chancellor, Other Notaries, the Episcopal Archives.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sedevacantists and Una Cum Masses
    Dedicated to Patrick Henry Omlor The Grain of Incense: Sedevacantists and Una Cum Masses — Rev. Anthony Cekada — www.traditionalmass.org Should we assist at traditional Masses offered “together with Thy servant Benedict, our Pope”? articulate any theological reasons or arguments for “Do not allow your tongue to give utterance to what your heart knows is not true.… To say Amen is to what he does. subscribe to the truth.” He has read or heard the stories of countless early — St. Augustine, on the Canon martyrs who chose horrible deaths, rather than offer even one grain of incense in tribute to the false, ecu- “Our charity is untruthful because it is not severe; menical religion of the Roman emperor. So better to and it is unpersuasive, because it is not truthful… Where there is no hatred of heresy, there is no holi- avoid altogether the Masses of priests who, through ness.” the una cum, offer a grain of incense to the heresiarch — Father Faber, The Precious Blood Ratzinger and his false ecumenical religion… In many parts of the world, however, the only tra- IN OUR LIVES as traditional Catholics, we make many ditional Latin Mass available may be one offered by a judgments that must inevitably produce logical conse- priest (Motu, SSPX or independent) who puts the false quences in our actual religious practice. The earliest pope’s name in the Canon. Faced with choosing this or that I remember making occurred at about age 14. Gui- nothing, a sedevacantist is then sometimes tempted to tar songs at Mass, I concluded, were irreverent.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    THE RELIGIOUS STATE ACCORDING TO SUAREZ by John F. Martin, S.J. A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Canon Law, Saint Paul University, Ottawa, Canada, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Canon Law ,1 .u Ottawa* Ottawa, Canada, 1984 © John F. Martin, Ottawa, Canada, 1985. UMI Number: DC53636 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI UMI Microform DC53636 Copyright 2011 by ProQuest LLC All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Various circumstances have delayed the completion of this dissertation more than three years beyond the date I had originally anticipated. Accordingly, I wish to thank all those individuals whose patient encouragement has sustained me throughout the course of this project. In the first place, this study was made possible by my religious superiors and my brothers in Christ of the Maryland Province of the Society of Jesus. Two of these are deserving of special mention. Father Joseph P. Whelan, first as Assistant for Formation and Studies, and later as Provincial Superior of the Maryland Province, was the key influence in my embarking upon this work and in its sub­ sequent prosecution.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerome's Women Creating Identity and Fashioning Scholars
    Jerome’s Women Creating Identity and Fashioning Scholars Judith Margaret Nichols, M.LITT., B.A., GRAD.DIP.TESL. This Thesis is presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Western Australia School of Humanities Classics and Ancient History 2014 i Preface Jerome’s writings first came to my attention as an undergraduate. I was attracted by the vividness of his writing but puzzled that the female recipients of his correspondence tolerated such a vain, irascible and misogynistic mentor. I took my initial, tentative thesis to Dr Neil O’Sullivan, Discipline Chair of Classics and Ancient History at the University of Western Australia and Dr Michael Champion who listened patiently and encouraged me to persevere with a doctoral thesis. I am grateful to both men for their advice and suggestions in shaping this work. Dr O’Sullivan’s command of the classics pointed me in new and interesting directions. Dr Champion was extremely forbearing in listening to every new idea, commenting helpfully on successive drafts and making mentoring sessions enjoyable. I would also like to acknowledge the loving support of my husband, Tony, and our four adult children who have encouraged me and accepted my preoccupation without reproach. The translations in the thesis are my own, except where otherwise acknowledged. Translations of certain commentators have been included as reference points to my own and I have indicated where my interpretations differ from theirs. The standard unpunctuated Vulgate is among the texts that I regard as significant. ii iii Abstract This thesis studies the creation of identities and the role women play in Jerome’s socio-political, scholarly and eschatologically-oriented theology for Rome.
    [Show full text]
  • Title 30. Husband and Wife Chapter 1 Marriage
    Utah Code Title 30. Husband and Wife Chapter 1 Marriage 30-1-1 Incestuous marriages void. (1) The following marriages are incestuous and void from the beginning, whether the relationship is legitimate or illegitimate: (a) marriages between parents and children; (b) marriages between ancestors and descendants of every degree; (c) marriages between siblings of the half as well as the whole blood; (d) marriages between: (i) uncles and nieces or nephews; or (ii) aunts and nieces or nephews; (e) marriages between first cousins, except as provided in Subsection (2); or (f) marriages between any individuals related to each other within and not including the fifth degree of consanguinity computed according to the rules of the civil law, except as provided in Subsection (2). (2) First cousins may marry under the following circumstances: (a) both parties are 65 years of age or older; or (b) if both parties are 55 years of age or older, upon a finding by the district court, located in the district in which either party resides, that either party is unable to reproduce. Amended by Chapter 317, 2019 General Session 30-1-2 Marriages prohibited and void. (1) The following marriages are prohibited and declared void: (a) when there is a spouse living, from whom the individual marrying has not been divorced; (b) except as provided in Subsection (2), when an applicant is under 18 years old; and (c) between a divorced individual and any individual other than the one from whom the divorce was secured until the divorce decree becomes absolute, and, if an appeal is taken, until after the affirmance of the decree.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy of Melancholy by Democritus Junior
    THE ANATOMY OF MELANCHOLY WHAT IT IS WITH ALL THE KINDS, CAUSES, SYMPTOMS, PROGNOSTICS, AND SEVERAL CURES OF IT IN THREE PARTITIONS; WITH THEIR SEVERAL SECTIONS, MEMBERS, AND SUBSECTIONS, PHILOSOPHICALLY, MEDICINALLY, HISTORICALLY OPENED AND CUT UP BY DEMOCRITUS JUNIOR [ROBERT BURTON] WITH A SATIRICAL PREFACE, CONDUCING TO THE FOLLOWING DISCOURSE PART 2 – The Cure of Melancholy Published by the Ex-classics Project, 2009 http://www.exclassics.com Public Domain CONTENTS THE SYNOPSIS OF THE SECOND PARTITION............................................................... 4 THE SECOND PARTITION. THE CURE OF MELANCHOLY. .............................................. 13 THE FIRST SECTION, MEMBER, SUBSECTION. Unlawful Cures rejected.......................... 13 MEMB. II. Lawful Cures, first from God. .................................................................................... 16 MEMB. III. Whether it be lawful to seek to Saints for Aid in this Disease. ................................ 18 MEMB. IV. SUBSECT. I.--Physician, Patient, Physic. ............................................................... 21 SUBSECT. II.--Concerning the Patient........................................................................................ 23 SUBSECT. III.--Concerning Physic............................................................................................. 26 SECT. II. MEMB. I....................................................................................................................... 27 SUBSECT. I.--Diet rectified in substance...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Selections from the Correspondence of The
    .. SELECTIONS FROM THE CORRESPONDENCE OF THE FIRST LORD ACTON ~ 1 'I A FRIEND sends me La l·'lanare LibCrale of Ghent for August 21st, with this article marked in heavy blue pencil. I publish it without any comment whatever. ," "CATHOLIC TOLERANCE /~ / }' :?£, "The punishment of death for heretics. ' "Fr. Lcpicia, professor of theology at the College of Prop- . aganda in Rome, is the author of a text-book in common use by the future priests who study at Rome. The book is entitled: Ooncerning the Stability ana the Proorese 01 Dogma. It was reissued with augmentations in 1910. A new edition has just appeared, bearing the approbation of high Church authorities. And here is what one reads on page 103: "'Q. Can heretics be tolerated, and if so, on what condi- tions?' "'A. As soon as one proclaims in public a heretical doc- trine, and tries to corrupt others by words or example, he can not only be excommunicated (to speak abstractly) but he ought to be killed, in all justice, to the end that he may not corrupt I a very great number by contamination. For a bad man is worse than a wild beast, and he docs more harm, as Aristotle says t (Ethic8 I, vil, in fine). So as it is not evil to kill a noxious beast of the forest, it is good to take away the life of a heretic who denies divine truth and hinders the salvation of others.' "And on page 200 this sentence is to be found: "'To the Church returns, in truth, the right of pronouncing sentence of death against heretics.' Who then can say that the Roman Catholic Church is becoming more tolerant? Nunc erudimini/" '00.-- __ > _ i, ~-....
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the 1962 Vatican Instruction “Crimen Sollicitationis
    THE 1962 VATICAN INSTRUCTION “CRIMEN SOLLICITATIONIS,” PROMULGATED ON MARCH 16, 1962 Observations by Thomas Doyle, O.P., J.C.D. November 1, 2006 1. The recently revealed (2003) Vatican document outlining the procedures for dealing with cases of solicitation of sex by priest-confessors has caused a swell of alarm and surprise on the part of survivors, attorneys and others. 2. This document was issued by the Congregation of the Holy Office in March, 1962. It was presented by the Prefect, Alfredo Cardinal Ottaviani, to Pope John XXIII for the Pope’s approval. This is the normal manner of receiving Papal approval for documents of this nature. It was then sent to all the bishops in the world. The bishops were admonished to maintain strict confidentiality about the document and ordered not to allow it to be reproduced or commented upon. 3. Crimen Sollicitationis remained in effect until 2001 when the Vatican published a new set of procedures for prosecuting especially grave canonical crimes, including certain sexual crimes committed by the clergy. Two official documents were issued. The first was an apostolic letter of Pope John Paul II, known by its Latin title Sacramentorum sanctitatis tutela, by which the actual norms were promulgated. This letter, dated April 30, 2001, was followed on May 18, 2001 by an official document that set forth the norms. This latter document was signed by Cardinal Josef Ratzinger, prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Both documents refer to certain serious canonical crimes and among those is sexual abuse by clerics. These documents represent revised procedures to be used by Bishops and major religious superiors in response to allegations of clergy sexual abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Multinormativity Emerges from Multilevel Governance. Uses of the Council of Trent in Examinations for Ecclesiastical Benefices in 19Th-Century Brazil
    ADMINISTORY ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR VERWALTUNGSGESCHICHTE BAND 5, 2020 SEITE 96–115 D O I : 10.2478/ADHI-2020-0007 Multinormativity Emerges From Multilevel Governance. Uses of the Council of Trent in Examinations for Ecclesiastical Benefices in 19th-Century Brazil ANNA CLARA LEHMANN MARTINS Introduction1 Nineteenth-century Brazilian ecclesiastical and discipline, the setting of diocesan limits, the control administration can be recognised as the object of a over norms issued by the Holy See, etc.4 Despite the system of multilevel governance orientated by a wide nationalist waves observed during the 19th century, the range of normative resources. Not only the local clergy, Brazilian Church was not excluded from contact with but also imperial institutions and the Roman Curia were the Holy See. On the contrary, the administration of engaged in diocesan administration. The responsibility imperial dioceses involved, to a greater or lesser extent, of the Empire of Brazil (1822–1889) towards Catholic interaction between local ecclesiastical authorities and institutions (churches, monasteries, seminaries, etc.) Roman dicasteries via the sending of reports, dubia, in its territory was due to the maintenance of royal requests for faculties and validations. patronage (padroado) after the country’s independence.2 This system of multilevel governance5 operated in Brazil echoed to some extent the legal pattern that had a scenario of coexistence of norms created/interpreted underlain the relationship between ecclesiastical and by different institutions and actors, in different secular powers in Portugal since the early modern historical periods. Matters of Church administration, period,3 but the novel Empire did so within a framework such as ecclesiastical examinations for the provision of of transition between the Ancien Régime and 19th- benefices (in Portuguese: concursos eclesiásticos para century liberal constitutionalism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Similarity of Fundamental Doctrines of Law Which Underlies Their Conceptual Formulation in Different Legal Systems
    Hastings Law Journal Volume 18 | Issue 3 Article 2 1-1967 The leftC : The imiS larity of Fundamental Doctrines of Law which Underlies their Conceptual Formulation in Different Legal Systems Ralph A. Newman Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Ralph A. Newman, The Cleft: eTh Similarity of Fundamental Doctrines of Law which Underlies their Conceptual Formulation in Different Legal Systems, 18 Hastings L.J. 481 (1967). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol18/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. The Cleft: The Similarity of Fundamental Doctrines of Law which Underlies their Conceptual Formulation in Different Legal Systems By RALPH A. NEwMAN* The chapter of History that must soonest be rewritten is the chapter of the Assimilation and Harmonizationof World-Law.** CARDOZO, in his famous lectures on The Nature of the Judicial Process, refers to the presence in Anglo-American law of "certain large and fundamental concepts, which comparative jurisprudence shows to be common to other highly developed systems."1 Many of the fundamental concepts, of which Cardozo and others-Vico, 2 an Italian, Ehrlich,3 a German, Wiirzel,4 an Austrian, and Ripert,5 a Frenchman- have spoken, arise out of "standards of right conduct, which find expression in the mores of the community," 6 and which, as Del Vecchio has superbly said 7 measure the degree of the humanity of laws.
    [Show full text]
  • New Horizons in Spanish Colonial Law Contributions to Transnational Early Modern Legal History
    GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES ON LEGAL HISTORY 3 THOMAS DUVE HEIKKI PIHLAJAMÄKI (EDS.) New Horizons in Spanish Colonial Law Contributions to Transnational Early Modern Legal History GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES ON LEGAL HISTORY 3 Global Perspectives on Legal History A Max Planck Institute for European Legal History Open Access Publication http://global.rg.mpg.de Series Editors: Thomas Duve, Stefan Vogenauer Volum e 3 Global Perspectives on Legal History is a book series edited and published by the Max Planck Institute for European Legal History, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. As its title suggests, the series is designed to advance the scholarly research of legal historians worldwide who seek to transcend the established boundaries of national legal scholarship that typically sets the focus on a single, dominant modus of normativity and law. The series aims to privilege studies dedicated to reconstructing the historical evolution of normativity from a global perspective. It includes monographs, editions of sources, and collaborative works. All titles in the series are available both as premium print-on-demand and in the open-access format. THOMAS DUVE HEIKKI PIHLAJAMÄKI (EDS.) New Horizons in Spanish Colonial Law Contributions to Transnational Early Modern Legal History MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EUROPEAN LEGAL HISTORY 2015 ISBN 978-3-944773-02-5 ISSN 2196-9752 First published in 2015 Published by Max Planck Institute for European Legal History, Frankfurt am Main Printed in Germany by epubli, Prinzessinnenstraße 20, 10969 Berlin http://www.epubli.de Max Planck
    [Show full text]
  • SACRAMENTORUM SANCTITATIS TUTELA English
    SACRAMENTORUM SANCTITATIS TUTELA POPE JOHN PAUL II APOSTOLIC LETTER GIVEN MOTU PROPRIO by which are promulgated Norms concerning the more grave delicts reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith The Safeguarding of the Sanctity of the Sacraments, especially the Most Holy Eucharist and Penance, and the keeping of the faithful, called to communion with the Lord, in their observance of the sixth commandment of the Decalogue, demand that the Church itself, in her pastoral solicitude, intervene to avert dangers of violation, so as to provide for the salvation of souls “which must always be the supreme law in the Church” (Codex Iuris Canonici, can. 1752). Indeed, Our Predecessors already provided for the sanctity of the sacraments, especially penance, through appropriate Apostolic Constitutions such as the Constitution Sacramentum Poenitentiae, of Pope Benedict XIV, issued June 1, 1741;[1] the same goal was likewise pursued by a number of canons of the Codex Iuris Canonici, promulgated in 1917 with their fontes by which canonical sanctions had been established against delicts of this kind.[2] In more recent times, in order to avert these and connected delicts, the Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office, through the Instruction Crimen sollicitationis, addressed to all Patriarchs, Archbishops, Bishops, and other local Ordinaries “even of an Oriental Rite” on March 16, 1962, established a manner of proceeding in such cases, inasmuch as judicial competence had been attributed exclusively to it, which competence could be exercised either administratively or through a judicial process. It is to be kept in mind that an Instruction of this kind had the force of law since the Supreme Pontiff, according to the norm of can.
    [Show full text]
  • Fletcher Class – Supplemental Tribal Law Materials Williams V. Lee
    Fletcher Class – Supplemental Tribal Law Materials Williams v. Lee Notes 1. Professor Wilkinson described the historical context of this landmark decision as follows: The rendering of the Williams decision can fairly be set as a watershed for several reasons. For decades before, Indian law decisions had been rendered fitfully by the Supreme Court. The tribes and the federal government instituted few cases to establish or expand tribal powers. Most of the litigation to reach the Court during the twentieth century before 1959 arose out of disputes involving individual Indians or even non- Indians; as a result the decisions lacked the public law overtones of either the modern era or the nineteenth century. * * * After Williams, the pace of decisions began to accelerate, with the result that the Court has become more active in Indian law than in fields such as securities, bankruptcy, pollution control and international law. Wilkinson, American Indians, Time and the Law, supra, at 1–2. 2. Justice Black cites the "courageous and eloquent" opinion of Chief Justice Marshall in Worcester as the source of the "basic policy" informing the infringement test announced by the Court in Williams: "Absent governing acts of Congress, the question has always been whether the state action infringed on the right of reservation Indians to make their own laws and be ruled by them." Did Williams depart from the basic legal analysis of tribal jurisdiction in Worcester? How would you state the Williams approach if you were an advocate asserting state jurisdiction over reservation Indians? If you were a tribal judge asserting exclusive tribal court civil adjudicatory jurisdiction over a non-Indian on the reservation? 3.
    [Show full text]