Fire Protection: Engines and Auxiliary Power Units

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fire Protection: Engines and Auxiliary Power Units Because of the importance of engines to safe flight, it is critical that they incorporate extensive and reliable fire‑protection systems. 14 aero quarterly qtr_04 | 10 Fire Protection: engines and auxiliary Power units the engines and auxiliary power units (aPus) on Boeing airplanes incorporate extensive measures for fire protection, including fire detection and extinguishing systems. By Sham Hariram, technical Fellow, Boeing Propulsion engineering; Paul Philipp, Senior Propulsion engineer, Boeing Propulsion engineering; and Dave Dummeyer, associate technical Fellow, Boeing Propulsion engineering This article is the first in a series exploring to effect this separation, isolation, and porate extensive and reliable fire‑protection the implementation of fire protection on control, Boeing uses both passive and systems. the aPu utilizes similar systems. transport category airplanes. active systems. Passive systems include the this article describes how Boeing provides use of noncombustible or self‑extinguishing fire protection for the engine pods, also Fire protection is given one of the highest materials; separation by routing, compart‑ termed “engines,” and for aPus. an engine considerations at Boeing in airplane design, men tation, isolation, ventilation, and pod consists of the engine, the inlet, the testing, and certification. drainage; and bonding and grounding. nacelle, the thrust reverser, the exhaust in designing an airplane’s fire protection active systems include fire and overheat section, and the strut or pylon. systems, Boeing uses the principles of detection systems, fire‑extinguishing separation, isolation, and control. these systems, temperature sensing, air and fuel principles involve separating the three PaSSive fire-Protection SyStemS shut‑off means, and automatic shutdown essentials for creating a fire (i.e., fuel, of nonflight critical systems. Fire protection ignition source, and oxygen), isolating engine zones. the engines and strut or systems on Boeing airplanes meet all potential fires from spreading to other parts pylon structures on Boeing airplanes form aviation regulatory requirements as well of the airplane, and controlling a fire should compartments, each of which is isolated as internal Boeing design requirements. one occur. by basic structure and ancillary surfaces. Because of the importance of engines each engine nacelle or strut compartment to safe flight, it is critical that they incor‑ 15 WWW.Boeing.com/commercial/aeromagazine figure 1: compartmentation in a typical engine pod engine pods incorporate zones designed to minimize the probability of a fire and to isolate a fire, should one occur. Side view cross Section Fan compartment Fuel and Hydraulic and thrust reverser System Services aft Fairing transcowl cavity upper Strut cavities compartment 45° 45° Strut aft Strut Drain engine core cowl core compartment Dry Bays engine core Fan Duct thrust See cross‑Section lower Strut Surface and upper reverser View at right 90º min. of engine core cowl transcowl lower Bifurcation cavity main engine Drain core compartment including engine through lower Power and accessory Sections Bifurcation Flammable Fluid leakage zone Fire zone Dry Bay zone Firewall figure 2: a typical aPU compartment the aPu compartment firewall isolates the aPu from the rest of the airplane. Strut‑mounted Fire Detector inlet Door element exhaust Bulkhead aPu compartment Firewall Firewall‑mounted exhaust Fire Detector element Flow Fire Bottle exhaust Drain combustor and Door‑mounted Fire oil cooler Drain Detector element exhaust Flow Fire Bottle and Fire Detector elements aPu Firewall 16 aero quarterly qtr_04 | 10 figure 3: a typical strut or pylon is designated as a zone, such as fire zone, Strut structures incorporate numerous firewalls of various materials to flammable fluid leakage zone, or dry bay isolate strut and wing areas adjacent to engine fire zones. zone, according to the potential for the presence of flammable fluids and ignition sources (see fig. 1). only the compartments that contain thumbnail Fairing Fwd Fairing ignition sources and the potential for flammable fluid leakage are classified as fire zones. examples are the engine case around the compressor, combustor, and turbine sections of the engine. the gearbox underwing Fairing Fan cowl Support Beam and its accessories are also considered potential ignition sources during failure Fwd lower Vapor Barrier Skirt Fairing conditions that could cause temperatures to exceed the auto ignition temperatures of Side Fairing fluids that may be present in the compart‑ Fire Seal ment. the areas adjacent to the engine fire zone — such as the engine fan com‑ Heat Shield partment, strut or pylon, and strut heat shield — are isolated by firewalls. other compartments are isolated by bulkheads and vapor barriers. Boeing mitigates fire hazards in engine and nacelle compartments by: titanium aluminum composite nickel alloy ■■ minimizing the potential for ignition. ■■ using compartmentation and isolation. ■■ routing flammable fluid‑carrying lines figure 4: typical engine fire and overheat detector locations away from electrical wires and hot nacelle compartments contain multiple fire or overheat detector elements. pneumatic ducts. ■■ using nonflammable construction Fire Detector lower materials. Spar of Strut ■■ utilizing firewalls. ■■ Providing a means for detecting and extinguishing fires in fire zones. ■■ Providing a shut‑off means for flammable fluids into and out of the fire zone. ■■ minimizing the accumulation of Fan case overheat flammable fluids and vapors through the temperature Sensor use of drainage and ventilation. aPu compartment. the aPu compartment overheat Detector upper Forward is by definition a fire zone (see fig. 2). it is isolated from the rest of the airplane by a firewall. the aPu installation uses the same Fire Detectors fire hazard mitigation principles as the core aft annular engines listed above, plus: ■■ automatic shutdown of the aPu. ■■ automatic shutoff of air source. Flammable fluid drainage. the engine nacelle and aPu installations are designed to drain Fire Detector flammable fluids overboard. these drainage lower Bifurcation provisions include drain holes, hoses, and tubing for capturing and safely discharging Fire and overheat Detectors engine Fan engine core flammable fluid leakage overboard. 17 WWW.Boeing.com/commercial/aeromagazine figure 5: engine fire-extinguishing Wing Front system Spar on this airplane model, two fire‑extinguishing‑agent bottles and associated tubing are installed in the leading edge of each side of the wing. Fire outboard engine extinguishing extinguishing Bottles tubing inboard engine Strut engine Fire or Pylon extinguishing tubing Ventilation. in the engine pod, ventilation fluid, vapor, or the propagation of fire to active fire-Protection SyStemS air is provided in fire and flammable fluid adjacent zones. leakage zones to minimize the accumulation most aPu installations are located in the engine fire detection. the typical engine of flammable vapor. all ventilation flow is airplane tailcone outside of the pressure fire‑detection system includes both fire designed to exit safely without being vessel or passenger compartment. this and overheat detectors (see fig. 4). each reingested. in the engine core fire zone, provides a high level of isolation. the aPu detector location has two heat‑sensing controlled cooling flow provides a source compartment is further isolated from the elements along with associated support of core ventilation. Some installations forward sections of the airplane by a tubes, brackets, and electrical connectors. have dedicated ventilation inlets. the aPu fireproof compartment firewall. other aPu Sufficient area coverage is required to compart ments are ventilated by either a installations not located in the airplane ensure prompt detection of a fire within the mechanically driven fan or a passive tailcone are in self‑contained compartments fire zone. the detector elements of the fire‑ eduction cooling system. any flammable with firewall structure surrounding them on or overheat‑detection system are configured vapors are forced out through vent openings all exposed sides within the airplane. to form two redundant loops, with each or through the eduction exhaust system. detector loop monitored by a separate Bonding and grounding. all Boeing the airflow driven by either of these two control card or a controller. Signals from airplanes incorporate electrical bonding or systems prevents the accumulation of the detectors are processed through an grounding provisions for electrical system flammable vapors and provides cooling automatic fire‑and‑overheat‑logic‑and‑test components and structure to protect for hot surfaces. system to generate flight‑deck displays and against static electricity, sparking, or the aural warnings to alert the crew in the event Firewalls. the strut and nacelle areas arcing that occurs between surfaces of an engine fire. alerts are displayed in the adjacent to the engine fire zones are resulting from electrical system faults or form of lights (i.e., a red maSter Warn ing isolated by a firewall extending from the lightning strikes. the bonding or grounding for fire and an amber caution for over‑ engine fan frame to the exhaust nozzle (see prevents conditions that could ignite heat), together with the simultaneous fig. 3). For engines with fan compartment flammable vapors. illumination of the associated engine‑fire mounted gearbox and accessories, the explosion proofing. electrical
Recommended publications
  • Resource Advisor Guide
    A publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Resource Advisor Guide PMS 313 AUGUST 2017 Resource Advisor Guide August 2017 PMS 313 The Resource Advisor Guide establishes NWCG standards for Resource Advisors to enable interagency consistency among Resource Advisors, who provide professional knowledge and expertise toward the protection of natural, cultural, and other resources on wildland fires and all-hazard incidents. The guide provides detailed information on decision-making, authorities, safety, preparedness, and rehabilitation concerns for Resource Advisors as well as considerations for interacting with all levels of incident management. Additionally, the guide standardizes the forms, plans, and systems used by Resource Advisors for all land management agencies. The National Wildfire Coordinating Group (NWCG) provides national leadership to enable interoperable wildland fire operations among federal, state, tribal, territorial, and local partners. NWCG operations standards are interagency by design; they are developed with the intent of universal adoption by the member agencies. However, the decision to adopt and utilize them is made independently by the individual member agencies and communicated through their respective directives systems. Table of Contents Section One: Resource Advisor Defined ...................................................................................................................1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory U.S.Deportment of Transportution Fedeml Aviation Circular
    Pc/ Advisory U.S.Deportment of Transportution Fedeml Aviation Circular Subject: POWERPLANT INSTALLATION AND Date: 2/6/W ACNo: 20- 135 PROPULSION SYSTEM COMPONENT FIRE Initiated by: ANM- 110 Change: PROTECTION TEST METHODS, STANDARDS, AND CRITERIA. 1 PURPOSE. This advisory circular (AC) provides guidance for use in demonstrating compliance with the powerplant fire protection requirements of the Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR). Included in this document are methods for fire testing of materials and components used in the propulsion engines and APU installations, and in areas adjacent to designated fire zones, as well as the rationale for these methods. Since the method of compliance presented in this AC is not mandatory, the terms "shall" and "must," as used in this AC, apply only to an applicant who chooses to follow this particular method without deviation. 2 RELATED FAR SECTIONS. The applicable FAR sections are listed in appendix 1 of this AC. 3 BACKGROUND. Although 5 1.1 of the FAR provides general definitions for the terms "fireproof" and "fire resistant," these definitions do not specify heat intensity, temperature levels, duration (exposure time), or an appropriate wall thickness or other dimensional characteristics for the purpose intended. With the advent of surface coatings (i.e., ablative/ intumescent), composites, and metal honeycomb for acoustically treated ducting, cowling, and other components which may form a part of the nacelle firewall, applicant confusion sometimes exists as to how compliance can be shown, particularly with respect to the definition of "fireproof" and "fire resistant" as defined in 5 1.1. 4 DEFINITIONS. For the purposes of this AC, the following definitions .
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Management.Indd
    Fire today ManagementVolume 65 • No. 2 • Spring 2005 LLARGEARGE FFIRESIRES OFOF 2002—P2002—PARTART 22 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Erratum In Fire Management Today volume 64(4), the article "A New Tool for Mopup and Other Fire Management Tasks" by Bill Gray shows incorrect telephone and fax numbers on page 47. The correct numbers are 210-614-4080 (tel.) and 210-614-0347 (fax). Fire Management Today is published by the Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. The Secretary of Agriculture has determined that the publication of this periodical is necessary in the transaction of the pub- lic business required by law of this Department. Fire Management Today is for sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, at: Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: 202-512-1800 Fax: 202-512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 Fire Management Today is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/fmt/index.html Mike Johanns, Secretary Melissa Frey U.S. Department of Agriculture General Manager Dale Bosworth, Chief Robert H. “Hutch” Brown, Ph.D. Forest Service Managing Editor Tom Harbour, Director Madelyn Dillon Fire and Aviation Management Editor Delvin R. Bunton Issue Coordinator The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communica- tion of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720- 2600 (voice and TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Aircraft Integration on Compact Nacelle Aerodynamics
    Eects of Aircraft Integration on Compact Nacelle Aerodynamics Fernando Tejeroa,∗, Ioannis Goulosa, David G MacManusa, Christopher Sheafb aCentre for Propulsion Engineering, School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing, Craneld University, Bedfordshire, MK43 0AL bRolls-Royce plc., P.O. box 31, Derby, United Kingdom, DE24 8BJ Abstract To reduce specic fuel consumption, it is expected that the next generation of aero-engines will operate with higher bypass-ratios, and therefore fan diame- ters, than current in-service architectures. These new propulsion systems will increase the nacelle size and incur in an additional overall weight and drag con- tribution to the aircraft. In addition, they will be installed more closely-coupled with the airframe, which may lead to an increase in adverse installation eects. As such, it is required to develop compact nacelles which will not counteract the benets obtained from the new engine cycles. A comprehensive investigation of the eects of nacelle design on the overall aircraft aerodynamic performance is required for a better understanding on the eects of aero-engine integration. This paper presents a method for the multi-objective optimisation of drooped and scarfed non-axisymmetric nacelle aero-engines. It uses intuitive Class Shape Tranformations (iCSTs) for the aero-engine geometry denition, multi-point aerodynamic simulation, a near-eld nacelle drag extraction method and the NSGA-II genetic algorithm. The process has been employed for the aerody- namic optimisation of a compact nacelle aero-engine as well as a conventional nacelle conguration. Subsequently, the designed architectures were installed on a conventional commercial transport aircraft and evaluated at dierent in- stallation positions.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Protection Guide for Electrical Installations
    Fire protection guide for electrical installations Building Connections Table of contents In the second edition of this fire protection guide, we have again compiled lots of useful information. The in- terconnections of fire protection between different types of technical building equipment are now ex- plained in even more detail. Perhaps you will find some new information in this edition which can help you in the planning and implementation of fire protec- tion systems. BSS Brandschutzleitfaden für die Elektroinstallation / en / 2019/03/22 08:28:10 08:28:10 (LLExport_04692) / 2019/03/22 08:28:13 2 Table of contents Fire protection guide for electrical installations Table of contents 1 General introduction 7 1.1 Construction law 12 1.2 The four pillars of fire protection 18 1.3 Construction products 26 1.4 Fire protection concepts 32 2 Maintenance of the fire sections – protection aim 1 36 2.1 Components closing rooms – firewalls 36 2.2 Requirements for cable penetrations - insulation 36 2.3 Proofs of usability 39 2.4 Construction types of cable and combination insulation 42 2.5 Applications and special applications 52 2.6 Selection aid and OBO Construct BSS 60 2.7 Building in old buildings 62 2.8 Cable bandages 65 3 Protection of escape routes – protection aim 2 75 3.1 What is an escape and rescue route? 75 3.2 Installations in lightweight partitions 78 3.3 Installation in false ceilings 80 3.4 Installations in underfloor systems 91 3.5 Shielding with plate material 93 3.6 Cable routing in fire protection ducts 94 4 Maintaining the electrical
    [Show full text]
  • IIIHIHIIIHIIII O US005143329A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,143,329 Coffinberry (45) Date of Patent: Sep
    IIIHIHIIIHIIII O US005143329A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,143,329 Coffinberry (45) Date of Patent: Sep. 1, 1992 (54) GASTURBINE ENGINE POWERED AIRCRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS SYSTEM AND BOUNDARY LAYER BLEED 0065855 5/1982 European Pat. Off. (75) Inventor: George A. Coffinberry, West Chester, g 32 E." Ohio 143598 4/1953 United Kingdom. (73) Assignee: General Electric Company, 744923 5/1954 United Kingdom. 774695 4/1955 United Kingdom . Cincinnati, Ohio 846358 6/1958 United Kingdom. 21 Appl. No.: 738,985 1530330 1/1976 United Kingdom . 202.7874 2/1980 United Kingdom ............. 24418.5 22 Filed: Aug. 1, 1991 2074654 4/1980 United Kingdom . 2076897 12/1981 United Kingdom ............. 244/118.5 Related U.S. Application Data 2127492 6/1983 United Kingdom . 62 Division of Ser. No. 531,718, Jun. 1, 1990. Primary Examiner-Joseph F. Peters, Jr. 5 Assistant Examiner-Christopher P. Ellis O2,207. Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Jerome C. Squillaro 244/53 R; 45.4/71 57 ABSTRACT 58) Field of Search ..................... 244/118.5, 207, 208, 244/209 53 R. 60/39. 142 39.07, 39.15, 39.183: An aircraft gas turbine engine is provided with a start s A 4-y 9. '987 ing air turbine that is directly connected through the starter gearbox to the high pressure (HP) shaft and is 56) References Cited provided with an apparatus to extract excess energy U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS from engine compressor bleed air, return it to the en 2,734,443 2/1956 Wood ..................................... oss gine, and to start the engine with compressed air from 2,777,301 1/1957 Kuhn .....
    [Show full text]
  • Break-Away Firewall Connection System
    Break-Away Firewall Connection System Description and Proof-of-Concept A Technical Article by Y. Korany, Ph.D., P.Eng. M. Hatzinikolas, Ph.D., P.Eng., FCSCE May, 2013 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 1 Background .............................................................................................................................................. 2 Description of the Break-Away Connector ............................................................................................. 4 Proof-of-Principal Testing ....................................................................................................................... 6 Summary and Conclusions ...................................................................................................................... 9 References.............................................................................................................................................. 10 Appendix: Break-Away Connection System Details ............................................................................. 11 i List of Figures Figure 1: Floor-to-Firewall Connection using a Break-away Connector ................................................ 5 Figure 2: Support Member Detail ............................................................................................................ 5 Figure 3: Test of a Fusible Member under Normal Service Conditions .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Helicopter Safety November-December 1988
    F L I G H T S A F E T Y F O U N D A T I O N HELICOPTER SAFETY Vol. 14 No. 6 November/December 1988 Tiltrotor Offers A Choice Although the first flight of the V-22 Osprey tiltrotor has been delayed, the author has had the opportunity to fly Bell-Boeing’s simulator at Ft. Worth, Tex., U.S. Through his description of his simulator ride, it is apparent the tiltrotor will be a challenge for both fixed-wing and helicopter pilots. by Joe Mashman Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. and Boeing Helicopter Com- Flying the Tiltrotor Simulator pany joined forces to develop the V-22 Osprey tiltrotor air- craft, based upon the Bell Model 301/XV-15, a two-seat tiltro- This pilot recently flew the Bell-Boeing engineering tiltrotor tor research aircraft. simulator, at Ft. Worth, Tex., U.S., and discovered the unique qualities of the tiltrotor aircraft. The all-composite (epoxy/graphite laminate) V-22 is 57.25 feet long and has a 46.5 foot wingspan. Its obstruction-free The simulator was configured with the U.S. Navy V-22 Os- cabin is 24 feet 2 inches long, 5 feet 11 inches wide and 6 feet prey control system and flight characteristics; the simulation high, and allows versatile configurations for personnel or called for 40,000 pounds maximum gross weight at sea level, cargo. Two Allison T406-AD-400 engines will deliver up to standard conditions. The handling qualities of the aircraft 6,150 shp to turn the two 38-foot diameter rotors.
    [Show full text]
  • APEGBC Technical and Practice Bulletin
    APEGBC Technical and Practice Bulletin Structural, Fire Protection and Building Envelope Professional Engineering Services for 5- and 6-Storey Wood Frame Residential Building Projects (Mid-Rise Buildings) © April 2009 All Rights Reserved Revised April 8, 2015 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Disclaimer and Exclusion of Liability ...................................................................................... 1 1.3 The Role of APEGBC ............................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Scope of Bulletin .................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 Applicability of Bulletin .......................................................................................................... 2 1.6 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................ 3 1.7 Introduction of Terms and Abbreviations .............................................................................. 3 2.0 PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE ................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Coordination .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of V-22 Tiltrotor Handling Qualities in the Instrument Meteorological Environment
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2006 Evaluation of V-22 Tiltrotor Handling Qualities in the Instrument Meteorological Environment Scott Bennett Trail University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Aerospace Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Trail, Scott Bennett, "Evaluation of V-22 Tiltrotor Handling Qualities in the Instrument Meteorological Environment. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2006. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/1816 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Scott Bennett Trail entitled "Evaluation of V-22 Tiltrotor Handling Qualities in the Instrument Meteorological Environment." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Aviation Systems. Robert B. Richards, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Rodney Allison, Frank Collins Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Scott Bennett Trail entitled “Evaluation of V-22 Tiltrotor Handling Qualities in the Instrument Meteorological Environment”.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparation for Initial Company Operations-Student Manual
    Preparation for Initial Company Operations PICO-Student Manual 1st Edition, 5th Printing-April 2014 FEMA/USFA/NFA PICO-SM April 2014 Preparation for Initial Company Operations 1st Edition, 5th Printing Preparation for Initial Company Operations PICO-Student Manual 1st Edition, 5th Printing-April 2014 This Student Manual may contain material that is copyright protected. USFA has been granted a license to use that material only for NFA-sponsored course deliveries as part of the course materials, and it shall not be duplicated without consent of the copyright holder. States wishing to use these materials as part of state-sponsorship and/or third parties wishing to use these materials must obtain permission to use the copyright material(s) from the copyright holder prior to teaching the course. PREPARATION FOR INITIAL COMPANY OPERATIONS NOTICE: This material has been developed by the National Fire Academy (NFA) of the United States Fire Administration (USFA) for use by State and metropolitan fire training programs. NFA endorsement of this material is conditional on use without modification. NFA material, whether printed text or software, may not be used in any manner that would mislead or that would suggest or imply endorsement by NFA of any commercial product, process, or service. ii PREPARATION FOR INITIAL COMPANY OPERATIONS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY UNITED STATES FIRE ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL FIRE ACADEMY FOREWORD The U.S. Fire Administration (USFA), an important component of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), serves the leadership of this Nation as the DHS's fire protection and emergency response expert. The USFA is located at the National Emergency Training Center (NETC) in Emmitsburg, Maryland, and includes the National Fire Academy (NFA), National Fire Data Center (NFDC), and the National Fire Programs (NFP).
    [Show full text]
  • GPO PRICE CFSTI PRICE(S) $ Hard Copy (HC)
    GPO PRICE $ CFSTI PRICE(S) $ Hard copy (HC)- Microfiche (MF) - NASA TM X-1683 WIND TUNNE IL INVESTIGATION OF AIRFRAME INSTALLATION EFFECTS ON UNDERWING ENGINE NACELLES AT MACH NUMBERS FROM 0.56 TO 1.46 By Bernard J. Blaha and Daniel C. Mikkelson Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION For sale by the Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information Springfield, Virginia 22151 - CFSTl price $3.00 ABSTRACT A 1/20 scale model of the F-106B with simulated underwing engine nacelles was tested in the Lewis Research Center 8- by 6-foot supersonic wind tunnel. Pressures and boattail drag coefficients were obtained on cone-cylinder and bulged nacelles with 15' conical boattail afterbodies and jet boundary simulators. Data were obtained with and without inlet airflow through the nacelles at attack angles from 0' to 8'. Effects of nacelle strut geometry, local elevon geometry, and elevon deflection were also investi- gated. The installed boattail pressure drag coefficient was lower than isolated nacelle values at all Mach numbers, and transonic drag rise was delayed to Mach 0.975. ii WIND TUNNEL INVESTIGATION OF AIRFRAME INSTALLAT~ONEFFECTS ON UNDERWING ENGINE NACELLES AT MACH NUMBERS FROM 0.56 TO 1.46 by Bernard J. Blaha and Daniel C. Mikkelson Lewis Research Center SUMMARY A test was conducted in the Lewis Research Center 8- by 6-foot supersonic wind tunnel utilizing a 1/20 scale model of the F-106B aircraft with simulated underwing en- gine nacelles. Pressures and boattail drag coefficients were obtained on cone-cylinder nacelles and on bulged nacelles, both with 15' conical boattail afterbodies and jet bound- ary simulators.
    [Show full text]