Quests Were Created to Lead You on a Meaningful Quest Through the Houston Zoo

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Quests Were Created to Lead You on a Meaningful Quest Through the Houston Zoo PREHISTORIC TEXAS COMES BACK TO LIFE! WHAT’S A CREATURE QUEST? Creature Quests were created to lead you on a meaningful quest through the Houston Zoo. As you visit these exhibits, be sure to consider the questions listed. Get ready for a fun-filled, educational Houston Zoo experience. DINOSAURS IN TEXAS There are 21 different dinosaurs that have been found in Texas! There is even a state dinosaur, the Paluxysaurus, whose tracks are still visible at Dinosaur Valley State Park. Paleontologists, people who study dinosaurs, are still searching Texas for more evidence of these prehistoric reptiles! FOSSILS We know about the dinosaurs in Texas because we have found their fossils. Fossils are formed when an animal dies and is rapidly covered in silt or mud, usually at the bottom of a lake or delta. There are two types of fossils: impressions which have been left in the rock and bones that have been turned into rock. We have both kinds of fossils in Texas. BEACHFRONT PROPERTY The marshes and deltas near the ocean are a great place for fossils to form. The oceanfront in Texas has changed over the years, and the farther you get from today’s beach, the older the fossils get! There are fossils of ice age mammals found in Texas, along with true dinosaurs and other reptiles that lived when they did. SAU LOTS OF DIFFERENT DINOSAURS INO RS! Just like animals that are alive today, there are many different CREATURE D AT THE HOUSTON ZOO types of dinosaurs. They lived in different habitats and ate PRESENTED BY different kinds of food. We can tell what they ate and the type of lives they lived by looking at their adaptations, just QUESTS like we can with animals that are alive today! For example, dinosaurs who were carnivores and ate meat had sharp AT THE HOUSTON ZOO teeth, while dinosaurs who were herbivores had flat teeth for grinding plants. TEKS ALIGNMENT: 1st–2nd: 9C, 3rd: 9B, 4th: 9A&B, 5th: 9B, 1st–4th: 10A COELOPHYSIS WHERE TO GO: (SEEL-oh-FIE-sis) As you trek through the exhibit, visit these 5 animals to discover more about Texas dinosaurs. Make These carnivores are some of the oldest dinosaurs found in sure to start with #1 and follow the map. 1 Texas. Their fossils were found in the Panhandle region. • What adaptations do you see that tell paleontologists that this was a carnivore? • How do you think Coelophysis’s long tail helped it survive? PROTOHADROS (pro-to-HAD-ross) Paleontologists think this dinosaur ate plants. It had the ability ENTRANCE to stand on either all four feet or just its back feet. 2 TICKETS • Why would it be helpful for an herbivore to be able to stand on its back legs? EDMONTONIA • Protohadros fossils were found in the process of building the Dallas/Fort Worth airport. What other ways can you think of that fossils might be discovered accidentally? 3 EDMONTOSAURUS DEINONYCHUS DEINONYCHUS 2 STEGOCERAS (die-NON-i-kus) 4 This predatory dinosaur was probably very fast, and 5 PROTOHADROS may have hunted in packs. Its fossils have been found in ORNITHOMIMUS 1 3 central Texas. TYRANNOSAURUS REX • What are the benefits of hunting in a group? COELOPHYSIS • What adaptations do you see that helped Deinonychus catch its prey? ACROCANTHOSAURUS BRACHIOSAURUS ORNITHOMIMUS DILOPHOSAURUS (OR-ni-thoh-MEE-mus) & BABY Ornithomimus fossils have been found in West Texas. They were omnivores, probably eating both plants and insects. 4 GIFT SHOP • “Ornithomimus” means “Bird Mimic.” What do you see that this dinosaur has in common with birds? • Why do you think paleontologists think this was an omnivore? EXIT TYRANNOSAURUS REX (tie-RAN-oh-SORE-us recks) The T-Rex that is at the Houston Zoo is a life-sized replica! BEYOND THE HOUSTON ZOO This famous dinosaur is known from fossils in the Big Bend area of Texas. 5 Research another dinosaur or prehistoric reptile that once lived in Texas. Make a list of adaptations that • We know that Tyrannosaurus was a carnivore. What adaptations does it have for eating meat? the reptile had to survive in its habitat. Find examples of animals that are currently alive in Texas that have • Many of the carnivorous dinosaurs were bipedal. Do you think there was an similar adaptations. Did you find many similarities? Why do you think this is? advantage for hunters to run on two feet instead of four?.
Recommended publications
  • Fused and Vaulted Nasals of Tyrannosaurid Dinosaurs: Implications for Cranial Strength and Feeding Mechanics
    Fused and vaulted nasals of tyrannosaurid dinosaurs: Implications for cranial strength and feeding mechanics ERIC SNIVELY, DONALD M. HENDERSON, and DOUG S. PHILLIPS Snively, E., Henderson, D.M., and Phillips, D.S. 2006. Fused and vaulted nasals of tyrannosaurid dinosaurs: Implications for cranial strength and feeding mechanics. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 51 (3): 435–454. Tyrannosaurid theropods display several unusual adaptations of the skulls and teeth. Their nasals are fused and vaulted, suggesting that these elements braced the cranium against high feeding forces. Exceptionally high strengths of maxillary teeth in Tyrannosaurus rex indicate that it could exert relatively greater feeding forces than other tyrannosaurids. Areas and second moments of area of the nasals, calculated from CT cross−sections, show higher nasal strengths for large tyrannosaurids than for Allosaurus fragilis. Cross−sectional geometry of theropod crania reveals high second moments of area in tyrannosaurids, with resulting high strengths in bending and torsion, when compared with the crania of similarly sized theropods. In tyrannosaurids trends of strength increase are positively allomeric and have similar allometric expo− nents, indicating correlated progression towards unusually high strengths of the feeding apparatus. Fused, arched nasals and broad crania of tyrannosaurids are consistent with deep bites that impacted bone and powerful lateral movements of the head for dismembering prey. Key words: Theropoda, Carnosauria, Tyrannosauridae, biomechanics, feeding mechanics, computer modeling, com− puted tomography. Eric Snively [[email protected]], Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada; Donald M. Henderson [[email protected]], Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology, Box 7500, Drumheller, Alberta T0J 0Y0, Canada; Doug S.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Hadrosauroid Dinosaur from the Early Late Cretaceous of Shanxi Province, China
    A New Hadrosauroid Dinosaur from the Early Late Cretaceous of Shanxi Province, China Run-Fu Wang1, Hai-Lu You2*, Shi-Chao Xu1, Suo-Zhu Wang1,JianYi1, Li-Juan Xie1, Lei Jia1, Ya-Xian Li1 1 Shanxi Museum of Geological and Mineral Science and Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, People’s Republic of China, 2 Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People’s Republic of China Abstract Background: The origin of hadrosaurid dinosaurs is far from clear, mainly due to the paucity of their early Late Cretaceous close relatives. Compared to numerous Early Cretaceous basal hadrosauroids, which are mainly from Eastern Asia, only six early Late Cretaceous (pre-Campanian) basal hadrosauroids have been found: three from Asia and three from North America. Methodology/Principal Findings: Here we describe a new hadrosauroid dinosaur, Yunganglong datongensis gen. et sp. nov., from the early Late Cretaceous Zhumapu Formation of Shanxi Province in northern China. The new taxon is represented by an associated but disarticulated partial adult skeleton including the caudodorsal part of the skull. Cladistic analysis and comparative studies show that Yunganglong represents one of the most basal Late Cretaceous hadrosauroids and is diagnosed by a unique combination of features in its skull and femur. Conclusions/Significance: The discovery of Yunganglong adds another record of basal Hadrosauroidea in the early Late Cretaceous, and helps to elucidate the origin and evolution of Hadrosauridae. Citation: Wang R-F, You H-L, Xu S-C, Wang S-Z, Yi J, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Rule Booklet
    Dig for fossils, build skeletons, and attract the most visitors to your museum! TM SCAN FOR VIDEO RULES AND MORE! FOSSILCANYON.COM Dinosaurs of North America edimentary rock formations of western North America are famous for the fossilized remains of dinosaurs The rules are simple enough for young players, but and other animals from the Triassic, Jurassic, and serious players can benefit Cretaceous periods of the Mesozoic Era. Your objective from keeping track of the cards that is to dig up fossils, build complete skeletons, and display have appeared, reasoning about them in your museum to attract as many visitors as possible. probabilities and expected returns, and choosing between aggressive Watch your museum’s popularity grow using jigsaw-puzzle and conservative plays. scoring that turns the competition into a race! GAME CONTENTS TM 200,000300,000 160,000 VISITORS VISITORS PER YEAR 140,000 VISITORS PER YEAR 180,000 VISITORS PER YEAR 400,000 VISITORS PER YEAR Dig for fossils, build skeletons, and 340,000 VISITORS PER YEAR RD COLOR ELETONS CA GENUS PERIODDIET SK FOSSIL VISITORSPARTS 360,000 VISITORS PER YEAR PER YEAR attract the most visitors to your museum! VISITORS PER YEAR PER YEAR Tyrannosaurus K C 1 4 500,000 Brachiosaurus J H 1 3 400,000 ON YOUR TURN: TM SCAN FOR VIDEO Triceratops K H 1 3 380,000 RULES AND MORE! Allosaurus J C 2 Dig3 a first360,000 card. If it is a fossil, keep it hidden. FOSSILCANYON.COM Ankylosaurus K H 2 If it3 is an340,000 action card, perform the action.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revised Taxonomy of the Iguanodont Dinosaur Genera and Species
    ARTICLE IN PRESS + MODEL Cretaceous Research xx (2007) 1e25 www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes A revised taxonomy of the iguanodont dinosaur genera and species Gregory S. Paul 3109 North Calvert Station, Side Apartment, Baltimore, MD 21218-3807, USA Received 20 April 2006; accepted in revised form 27 April 2007 Abstract Criteria for designating dinosaur genera are inconsistent; some very similar species are highly split at the generic level, other anatomically disparate species are united at the same rank. Since the mid-1800s the classic genus Iguanodon has become a taxonomic grab-bag containing species spanning most of the Early Cretaceous of the northern hemisphere. Recently the genus was radically redesignated when the type was shifted from nondiagnostic English Valanginian teeth to a complete skull and skeleton of the heavily built, semi-quadrupedal I. bernissartensis from much younger Belgian sediments, even though the latter is very different in form from the gracile skeletal remains described by Mantell. Currently, iguanodont remains from Europe are usually assigned to either robust I. bernissartensis or gracile I. atherfieldensis, regardless of lo- cation or stage. A stratigraphic analysis is combined with a character census that shows the European iguanodonts are markedly more morpho- logically divergent than other dinosaur genera, and some appear phylogenetically more derived than others. Two new genera and a new species have been or are named for the gracile iguanodonts of the Wealden Supergroup; strongly bipedal Mantellisaurus atherfieldensis Paul (2006. Turning the old into the new: a separate genus for the gracile iguanodont from the Wealden of England. In: Carpenter, K. (Ed.), Horns and Beaks: Ceratopsian and Ornithopod Dinosaurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Biogeography of Iguanodontian Dinosaurs, with Implications from Ontogeny and an Examination of the Function of the Fused Carpal-Digit I Complex
    Phylogeny and Biogeography of Iguanodontian Dinosaurs, with Implications from Ontogeny and an Examination of the Function of the Fused Carpal-Digit I Complex By Karen E. Poole B.A. in Geology, May 2004, University of Pennsylvania M.A. in Earth and Planetary Sciences, August 2008, Washington University in St. Louis A Dissertation submitted to The Faculty of The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 31, 2015 Dissertation Directed by Catherine Forster Professor of Biology The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University certifies that Karen Poole has passed the Final Examination for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy as of August 10th, 2015. This is the final and approved form of the dissertation. Phylogeny and Biogeography of Iguanodontian Dinosaurs, with Implications from Ontogeny and an Examination of the Function of the Fused Carpal-Digit I Complex Karen E. Poole Dissertation Research Committee: Catherine A. Forster, Professor of Biology, Dissertation Director James M. Clark, Ronald Weintraub Professor of Biology, Committee Member R. Alexander Pyron, Robert F. Griggs Assistant Professor of Biology, Committee Member ii © Copyright 2015 by Karen Poole All rights reserved iii Dedication To Joseph Theis, for his unending support, and for always reminding me what matters most in life. To my parents, who have always encouraged me to pursue my dreams, even those they didn’t understand. iv Acknowledgements First, a heartfelt thank you is due to my advisor, Cathy Forster, for giving me free reign in this dissertation, but always providing valuable commentary on any piece of writing I sent her, no matter how messy.
    [Show full text]
  • Inferring Body Mass in Extinct Terrestrial Vertebrates and the Evolution of Body Size in a Model-Clade of Dinosaurs (Ornithopoda)
    Inferring Body Mass in Extinct Terrestrial Vertebrates and the Evolution of Body Size in a Model-Clade of Dinosaurs (Ornithopoda) by Nicolás Ernesto José Campione Ruben A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto © Copyright by Nicolás Ernesto José Campione Ruben 2013 Inferring body mass in extinct terrestrial vertebrates and the evolution of body size in a model-clade of dinosaurs (Ornithopoda) Nicolás E. J. Campione Ruben Doctor of Philosophy Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto 2013 Abstract Organismal body size correlates with almost all aspects of ecology and physiology. As a result, the ability to infer body size in the fossil record offers an opportunity to interpret extinct species within a biological, rather than simply a systematic, context. Various methods have been proposed by which to estimate body mass (the standard measure of body size) that center on two main approaches: volumetric reconstructions and extant scaling. The latter are particularly contentious when applied to extinct terrestrial vertebrates, particularly stem-based taxa for which living relatives are difficult to constrain, such as non-avian dinosaurs and non-therapsid synapsids, resulting in the use of volumetric models that are highly influenced by researcher bias. However, criticisms of scaling models have not been tested within a comprehensive extant dataset. Based on limb measurements of 200 mammals and 47 reptiles, linear models were generated between limb measurements (length and circumference) and body mass to test the hypotheses that phylogenetic history, limb posture, and gait drive the relationship between stylopodial circumference and body mass as critics suggest.
    [Show full text]
  • Postcranial Anatomy of Tanius Sinensis Wiman, 1929 (Dinosauria; Hadrosauroidea) Postkraniala Anatomin Hos Tanius Sinensis Wiman, 1929 (Dinosauria; Hadrosauroidea)
    Examensarbete vid Institutionen för geovetenskaper Degree Project at the Department of Earth Sciences ISSN 1650-6553 Nr 320 Postcranial Anatomy of Tanius Sinensis Wiman, 1929 (Dinosauria; Hadrosauroidea) Postkraniala anatomin hos Tanius sinensis Wiman, 1929 (Dinosauria; Hadrosauroidea) Niclas H. Borinder INSTITUTIONEN FÖR GEOVETENSKAPER DEPARTMENT OF EARTH SCIENCES Examensarbete vid Institutionen för geovetenskaper Degree Project at the Department of Earth Sciences ISSN 1650-6553 Nr 320 Postcranial Anatomy of Tanius Sinensis Wiman, 1929 (Dinosauria; Hadrosauroidea) Postkraniala anatomin hos Tanius sinensis Wiman, 1929 (Dinosauria; Hadrosauroidea) Niclas H. Borinder ISSN 1650-6553 Copyright © Niclas H. Borinder and the Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University Published at Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University (www.geo.uu.se), Uppsala, 2015 Abstract Postcranial Anatomy of Tanius Sinensis Wiman, 1929 (Dinosauria; Hadrosauroidea) Niclas H. Borinder Tanius sinensis Wiman, 1929 was one of the first hadrosauroid or “duck-billed” taxa erected from China, indeed one of the very first non-avian dinosaur taxa to be erected based on material from the country. Since the original description by Wiman in 1929, the anatomy of T. sinensis has received relatively little attention in the literature since then. This is unfortunate given the importance of T. sinensis as a possible non-hadrosaurid hadrosauroid i.e. a member of Hadrosauroidea outside the family of Hadrosauridae, living in the Late Cretaceous, at a time when most non-hadrosaurid hadro- sauroids had become replaced by the members of Hadrosauridae. To gain a better understanding of the anatomy of T. sinensis and its phylogenetic relationships, the postcranial anatomy of it is redescribed. T. sinensis is found to have a mosaic of basal traits like strongly opisthocoelous cervical vertebrae, the proximal end of scapula being dorsoventrally wider than the distal end, the ratio between the proximodistal length of the metatarsal III and the mediolateral width of this element being greater than 4.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Colossal New Predatory Dino Terrorized Early Tyrannosaurs 22 November 2013
    Colossal new predatory dino terrorized early tyrannosaurs 22 November 2013 dinosaurs ever discovered. The only other carcharodontosaur known from North America is Acrocanthosaurus, which roamed eastern North America more than 10 million years earlier. Siats is only the second carcharodontosaur ever discovered in North America; Acrocanthosaurus, discovered in 1950, was the first. "It's been 63 years since a predator of this size has been named from North America," says Lindsay Zanno, a North Carolina State University paleontologist with a joint appointment at the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, and lead author of a Nature Communications paper describing the find. "You can't imagine how thrilled we were to see the bones of this behemoth poking out of the hillside." Zanno and colleague Peter Makovicky, from Chicago's Field Museum of Natural History, discovered the partial skeleton of the new predator in Utah's Cedar Mountain Formation in 2008. The species name acknowledges the Meeker family for its support of early career paleontologists at the Field Museum, including Zanno. This is an illustration of Siats meekerorum. Credit: Jorge Gonzales A new species of carnivorous dinosaur – one of the three largest ever discovered in North America – lived alongside and competed with small-bodied tyrannosaurs 98 million years ago. This newly discovered species, Siats meekerorum, (pronounced see-atch) was the apex predator of its time, and kept tyrannosaurs from assuming top predator roles for millions of years. Named after a cannibalistic man-eating monster from Ute tribal legend, Siats is a species of carcharodontosaur, a group of giant meat-eaters This illustration shows Siats within its ecosystem, eating that includes some of the largest predatory an Eolambia and intimidating early, small-bodied tyrannosauroids.
    [Show full text]
  • Cranial Anatomy of Allosaurus Jimmadseni, a New Species from the Lower Part of the Morrison Formation (Upper Jurassic) of Western North America
    Cranial anatomy of Allosaurus jimmadseni, a new species from the lower part of the Morrison Formation (Upper Jurassic) of Western North America Daniel J. Chure1,2,* and Mark A. Loewen3,4,* 1 Dinosaur National Monument (retired), Jensen, UT, USA 2 Independent Researcher, Jensen, UT, USA 3 Natural History Museum of Utah, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA 4 Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA * These authors contributed equally to this work. ABSTRACT Allosaurus is one of the best known theropod dinosaurs from the Jurassic and a crucial taxon in phylogenetic analyses. On the basis of an in-depth, firsthand study of the bulk of Allosaurus specimens housed in North American institutions, we describe here a new theropod dinosaur from the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation of Western North America, Allosaurus jimmadseni sp. nov., based upon a remarkably complete articulated skeleton and skull and a second specimen with an articulated skull and associated skeleton. The present study also assigns several other specimens to this new species, Allosaurus jimmadseni, which is characterized by a number of autapomorphies present on the dermal skull roof and additional characters present in the postcrania. In particular, whereas the ventral margin of the jugal of Allosaurus fragilis has pronounced sigmoidal convexity, the ventral margin is virtually straight in Allosaurus jimmadseni. The paired nasals of Allosaurus jimmadseni possess bilateral, blade-like crests along the lateral margin, forming a pronounced nasolacrimal crest that is absent in Allosaurus fragilis. Submitted 20 July 2018 Accepted 31 August 2019 Subjects Paleontology, Taxonomy Published 24 January 2020 Keywords Allosaurus, Allosaurus jimmadseni, Dinosaur, Theropod, Morrison Formation, Jurassic, Corresponding author Cranial anatomy Mark A.
    [Show full text]
  • Junior Paleontologists Journal – Week 3
    Junior Paleontologists Journal – Week 3 Welcome back, Junior Paleontologists! Are you ready to continue your adventures with dinosaurs and other fossils for another week? Dinosaur Detectives: Did you figure out what the tracks of Dilophosaurus looked like? Here is a picture of Dilophosaurus tracks from our exhibit at MNA: Does this look like the tracks you drew or imagined? There are some tracks like these in sandstones near Tuba City, Arizona. Now for Week 3: Our first dinosaur was Coelophysis from the Triassic Period. Our second was Dilophosaurus from the Jurassic Period. This week we will look at a dinosaur from the Cretaceous Period. It is a very different dinosaur, with the very difficult name Nothronychus. Besides its strange name, this dinosaur might be the strangest, weirdest dinosaur in the world! This is my favorite middle-size dinosaur because it is so weird, and because with a field crew I excavated it from southern Utah. This one is a little bigger than Dilophosaurus from last week, and much heavier. We have a complete skeleton on display at the Museum of Northern Arizona. First, let’s have some fun with two very hard words: “Nothronychus” and “therizinosaurs.” This dinosaur’s name is Nothronychus. Say it out loud: NO- throw-NIE-kus. Practice that, say it three times in a row. NO-throw-NIE-kus NO-throw-NIE-kus NO-throw-NIE-kus This dinosaur has a family with other dinosaurs, all of them very weird. The family is called the “therizinosaurs” or THAIR-uh-ZINE-o-saurs. The first part of the name sounds like the TH in “throw.” Now say it three times in a row.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jurassic Period
    The Jurassic Period Presentation by Isabella Siler and Robin Schneider Dilophosaurus. You’ll learn about them later. The Jurassic period: what does it mean? The word Jurassic means of or to the Jurassic period, which occurred between the Triassic and Cretaceous periods in the Mesozoic era, which means “The Age of Reptiles”. How long did it last? This period lasted from 199.6 to 145.5 million years ago and ended with a mass extinction and the beginning of Cretaceous period. It started with a major extinction event as well, with most invertebrates going extinct. The Jurassic period was a part of the Mid-Mesozoic era. Earth’s Climate During this time The Earth’s climate during the Jurassic period was quite warm, with tropical climates and temperate ones. Scientists have found that there weren’t many glaciers during this time and many lush forests, indicating that it was warmer during this period. The atmosphere during this time Science shows the atmosphere was humid, cloudy, and had much more carbon dioxide in the air than the current atmosphere. Earth’s continents during the Jurassic Period This was right after pangea broke up, so there were only 2 supercontinents: Laurasia and Gondwana. Laurasia was in the north while Gondwana was in the south. Laurasia is now North America, Europe and Asia; Gondwana is currently South America, India, Africa, Australia and Antarctica. Dinosaurs of the Jurassic - On The Ground Although the term Jurassic may conjure up images of dinosaurs like Tyrannosaurus rex, stegosaurus, or triceratops. However, none of those dinosaurs lived during this time.
    [Show full text]
  • Body-Size Evolution in the Dinosauria
    8 Body-Size Evolution in the Dinosauria Matthew T. Carrano Introduction The evolution of body size and its influence on organismal biology have received scientific attention since the earliest decades of evolutionary study (e.g., Cope, 1887, 1896; Thompson, 1917). Both paleontologists and neontologists have attempted to determine correlations between body size and numerous aspects of life history, with the ultimate goal of docu- menting both the predictive and causal connections involved (LaBarbera, 1986, 1989). These studies have generated an appreciation for the thor- oughgoing interrelationships between body size and nearly every sig- nificant facet of organismal biology, including metabolism (Lindstedt & Calder, 1981; Schmidt-Nielsen, 1984; McNab, 1989), population ecology (Damuth, 1981; Juanes, 1986; Gittleman & Purvis, 1998), locomotion (Mc- Mahon, 1975; Biewener, 1989; Alexander, 1996), and reproduction (Alex- ander, 1996). An enduring focus of these studies has been Cope’s Rule, the notion that body size tends to increase over time within lineages (Kurtén, 1953; Stanley, 1973; Polly, 1998). Such an observation has been made regarding many different clades but has been examined specifically in only a few (MacFadden, 1986; Arnold et al., 1995; Jablonski, 1996, 1997; Trammer & Kaim, 1997, 1999; Alroy, 1998). The discordant results of such analyses have underscored two points: (1) Cope’s Rule does not apply universally to all groups; and (2) even when present, size increases in different clades may reflect very different underlying processes. Thus, the question, “does Cope’s Rule exist?” is better parsed into two questions: “to which groups does Cope’s Rule apply?” and “what process is responsible for it in each?” Several recent works (McShea, 1994, 2000; Jablonski, 1997; Alroy, 1998, 2000a, 2000b) have begun to address these more specific questions, attempting to quantify patterns of body-size evolution in a phylogenetic (rather than strictly temporal) context, as well as developing methods for interpreting the resultant patterns.
    [Show full text]