Spencer Foundation Annual Report 1996

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Spencer Foundation Annual Report 1996 25 Twenty-five Years of Grantmaking THE SPENCER FOUNDATION 1996 ANNUAL REPORT The above quote was found in Lyle Spencer’s notes on the formation of the Foundation. The handwritten draft reads: “All the Spencer dough was earned, improb- ably, from education. It makes sense, therefore, that most of this money should be returned eventually to investigating ways in which education can be improved, around the world. Broadly conceived, wher- ever learning occurs.” The Spencer Foundation 25thAnniversary of Grantmaking TABLE OF CONTENTS iii Table of Contents v Directors, Advisors, & Staff 1 Introduction 2 Lyle M. Spencer I. THE FOUNDATION 1971-1995 6 Twenty-five Years of Grantmaking 14 Major Research Grants Program 20 Fellowship Programs 27 Small Research Grants Program 32 Current Foundation Initiatives 34 The Foundation and Chicago 36 Administrative and Financial History 40 Directors, 1971-1996 II. 1996 ANNUAL REPORT for year ended March 31, 1996 44 President’s Comments 46 Report of the Vice President 48 Application and Review Information The Foundation’s Programs: Research Programs: 52 Major Research Grants iii 53 Small Research Grants 56 The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation/ Spencer Foundation Professional Development Research Grants Fellowship Programs: 57 Spencer Dissertation Fellows 58 NAE/Spencer Postdoctoral Fellows 59 Spencer Fellows at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences 60 Spencer Senior Scholar Grants Experimental Research Training Grants Spencer Mentor Awards 61 AERA/Spencer Doctoral Research and Travel Fellows 62 Other Grants 63 Major Research Grants-in-Progress 67 Publications Received from Grantees 70 Report of the Treasurer 72 Financial Statements III. SPENCER GRANTEES, 1971-1995 79 Grant Listings Address The Spencer Foundation 900 North Michigan Avenue Suite 2800 Chicago, Illinois 60611-1542 312-337-7000 (telephone) 312-337-0282 (facsimile) 1996 ANNUAL REPORT DIRECTORS, ADVISORS, & STAFF BOARD OF DIRECTORS Cynthia M. Bentel PROGRAM ADVISORY COMMITTEE David S. Tatel Program Assistant Courtney Cazden Chair Elizabeth Carrick Vivian Gadsden William Julius Wilson Program Assistant to the Vice Pamela Grossman Vice-Chair President Patricia Gumport Frank L. Bixby Josephine Craven Stephen Raudenbush Patricia Albjerg Graham Systems Administrator/ Marcelo Suarez-Orozco Magdalene Lampert Office Activities Coordinator Robert A. LeVine Mary Patterson McPherson Doris E. Fischer DISSERTATION George A. Ranney, Jr. Administrative Assistant FELLOWSHIP SELECTION COMMITTEE John S. Reed Kathryn A. Gray Jennifer Hochschild Albert Shanker Program Assistant Lee S. Shulman Carol D. Lee Craig M. Joseph James Leloudis Research Associate/ Robert Margo STAFF Systems Planner Susan Florio-Ruane Geoffrey Saxe Patricia Albjerg Graham Judith Klippenstein Enrique Trueba President Administrative Assistant Angela Valenzuela John H. Barcroft to the President Vice President and Treasurer R. David Matthews Ines M. Milne Staff Assistant PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH Secretary and Controller Carrie A. McGill & DOCUMENTATION Program Assistant ADVISORY COMMITTEE Rebecca Barr v Sarah Gonzales Senior Program Officer Mary Jo Miller Paul Hill Program Assistant Catherine A. Lacey Jacqueline Jordan Irvine Senior Program Officer Mary Ellen Natonski Janice E. Jackson Peggy Mueller Assistant Secretary to the Susan Moore Johnson Director, Professional Foundation Harry Judge Susan Lytle Development Research Grants Martin A. Robinson Harold Richman Program Financial Assistant Tony Rotundo Lisa R. Lattuca Jennifer P. Savarirayan Associate Program Officer Program Assistant PRACTITIONER RESEARCH COMMUNICATION & Therese D. Pigott Patrick M. Sheahan MENTORING ADVISORY Associate Program Officer Research/Administrative COMMITTEE Mark E. Rigdon Associate Martha Rutherford, Chair Dixie Goswami Associate Program Officer Janet S. Szymanski Diane Waff Nidhi Mehrotra Program Assistant Assistant Program Officer Courtney Cazden Senior Advisor on Research on Practice * As of September, 1996 The Spencer Foundation TWENTY-FIVE25 YEARS OF GRANTMAKING Introduction very year since its formal this section to be the ensemble work grant-making began in 1971, of most of the current profession- Ethe Spencer Foundation has al staff, we celebrate and analyze published an Annual Report, our past with many different voic- describing grant programs, listing es. grants made, displaying the finan- Section II contains the cial condition of the Foundation, “Annual Report” on our twenty- providing information about appli- fifth year of operation, the year cation procedures, and noting any which ended March 31, 1996. significant events, activities, or pro- Section III contains a full list gram changes. This is the 26th of the grants made and fellowships such publication, and it serves a awarded by the Spencer Foundation, dual purpose. 1971 through 1995 (the 1996 list is As an annual report, it in Section II), on the principle that includes the information noted we should provide what an histo- 1 above for the fiscal year which rian might call the “primary ended March 31, 1996. However, sources” for our reflections and this is not only an annual report; interpretations of the Foundation’s it is also a twenty-five year report, grant-making. This list faithfully seeking to capture the experience reproduces, by year, the grants and of twenty-five years of support for fellowships published in each of research on education by the the Foundation’s Annual Reports Spencer Foundation. The volume beginning with the first such report is in three sections. in 1971. We believe that these annu- Section I contains essays by al reports were complete. However, current staff members of the we would be grateful to know of any Foundation, reflecting on twenty- omissions or inaccuracies. five years of work, mostly by our Patrick M. Sheahan predecessors, to whom we are Editor deeply indebted. Since we wished THE SPENCER FOUNDATION ganized as a commercial firm in 1939 and have been going up ever since.” In 1964 the firm was pur- chased by IBM, but Spencer con- tinued as chief executive and guid- ing spirit until his death in 1968. His colleagues at SRA and friends in higher education referred to him as a businessman who was always an educator, a man who was a researcher all his life. Charles Dollard, Spencer’s friend and an Lyle M. Spencer original director of the Spencer 2 Lyle M. Spencer was a twen- Foundation, noted, “Lyle had a ty-seven-year-old graduate student passionate belief in education as in sociology at the University of the modus vivendi of a democra- Chicago in 1938 when he founded tic society. He was particularly Science Research Associates (SRA), concerned both professionally and the educational publishing firm personally with the education of which provided the basis of his the young. He liked to say that it wealth and ultimately made pos- was quite as important where one sible the creation of the Spencer went to kindergarten as where one Foundation. Speaking to employ- went to college.” While leading his ees of the firm in 1961, Mr. Spencer business career, he served as a noted that SRA was initially a non- trustee of three universities, was profit organization and “we near- a director of what is now the ly went broke in the first year before United Negro College Fund, and we gave up that idea....We reor- was on the visiting committees 1996 ANNUAL REPORT 1911-1968Lyle M. Spencer for education at Harvard and the his notes on the role and pur- University of Chicago. pose of the Foundation have been Mr. Spencer spent much of preserved: his childhood in Appleton, Wisconsin, but went to college in “Improve learning process, includ- the Pacific Northwest. He received ing diffusion into developing his undergraduate and master’s countries. Maybe non-cognitive.” degrees in sociology from the University of Washington in “Prejudiced against bricks and Seattle, where his father was pres- mortar.” ident from 1927-1933, then he “All support periods finite.” continued his graduate work in sociology at the University of “Projects where other money not Chicago. readily available at this point.” 3 He established the Spencer Foundation in 1962. In the same “Tend to bet on people even more year, he presented testimony to than the project itself.” Congress, as President of SRA, in which he commented, “In my judgment, hard-minded, sensi- On August 21, 1968, Lyle ble investments in educational Spencer died of pancreatic cancer, research can provide the most and was buried in Appleton, effective single method of Wisconsin. Almost thirty years strengthening our schools.” later, the grants of the Spencer After the sale of his firm Foundation keep alive the intel- to IBM in 1964 it was clear that lectual vitality and the curiosity the Spencer Foundation might for knowledge and its uses which be of significant size. Some of characterized his life. The Foundation, 1971-1995 ince 1971 the Foundation has sup- Sported a wide range of research on educational topics — from how children learn to the culture of the classroom; from the effects of teacher interventions to the 4 economics of school finance; from the roles which ethnicity and gender play in edu- cation to the promise of new technologies. This section contains essays on the diverse ways in which the Foundation has sup- ported research aimed at understanding education and improving its practice. 5 THE SPENCER FOUNDATION TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF GRANTMAKING Patricia Albjerg Graham, President University, Lawrence University, and the University of Chicago. During the settle-
Recommended publications
  • Summer 2013 Section B01 Syllabus
    George Mason University College of Education and Human Development Secondary Education Program EDUC 672 Human Development and Learning: Secondary Education Summer 2013 Instructor: David Vallett, PhD Day and Time: Tuesday and Thursday 4:30-7:10 Class Location: Robinson A 412 Telephone: 910 352 8275 Email: [email protected] Office Hours: By appointment Required Textbooks: Snowman, J., & MCCown, R. (2013). Educational psychology. Wadsworth, Cengage Publishing. (This is an interactive e-book that includes video cases and auto-graded quizzes among other online supports.) Other articles and handouts will be distributed during class or posted on-line on Bb. The site for our course is at http://mymasonportal.gmu.edu. Course Description Education 672 explores the processes that influence the intellectual, social, emotional and physical development of middle and high school students. Within that context, the course further examines the processes and theories that provide a basis for understanding the learning process. Particular attention is given to constructivist theories and practices of learning, the role of symbolic competence as a mediator of learning, understanding, and knowing, and the facilitation of critical thinking and problem solving. Processes of developing and learning are considered as they impact the design of instruction and the selection of curriculum. The course also explores the relation of theories of learning to the construction of learning environments, student motivation, classroom management, assessment and how technology supports teaching and learning. Course Methodology The course is structured around readings, case analyses, reflections on those readings, conceptual analyses of developmental psychology and learning theories, expert group projects, a review of current research, and technology activities in a seminar format.
    [Show full text]
  • On Research on Teaching: a Conversation with Lee Shulman
    On Research on Teaching: A Conversation with Lee Shulman Stanford Professor Lee Shulman reflects on the matter, or context, you're likely to get limitations of generalizations about a set of principles much like those of effective effective teaching. I think they are teaching and describes how case histories reasonable and warranted — although I'd offer several caveats. specific stories about classroom experience For example, those principles were can enrich our collective "wisdom of practice." developed from studies in which teachers were observed 5 or 10 times during a school year, and then the data from all 10 times were aggregated. A teacher of mathematics might be introducing the topic of estimation on day one, having the kids do guided practice on factoring on day two. preparing the kids for a quiz on the topic of expo nents on day three, and so on. So, when you collapse all that together, you're putting into the same pot a lot of very different teaching situations, even for teaching mathematics to 2nd graders. Then the researcher would correlate I the frequencies with which the teachers did a variety RON BRANDT of things in all of those sessions against the performance of the ~jpt the early 1980s, educators were Well, I think we began to realize the students two to nine months later on a i excited because we seemed to limitations of that kind of research. standardized achievement test. That's J. have the beginnings of a firm We realized that it provided answers to why the research is called "process- knowledge base for our profession.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eagle 2007 the Eagle 2007
    The Eagle 2007 The Eagle 2007 ST JOHN’S COLLEGE CAMBRIDGE The Eagle 2007 The Eagle is published annually by St John’s College, Cambridge, and sent free of charge to members of St John’s College and other interested parties. Articles to be considered for publication should be addressed to: The Editor, The Eagle, Development Office, St John’s College, Cambridge, CB2 1TP. St John’s College Cambridge CB2 1TP http://www.joh.cam.ac.uk/ General telephone enquiries: 01223 338600 General fax enquiries: 01223 337720 General email enquiries: [email protected] Printed by Cambridge University Press Published by St John’s College, Cambridge, 2007 CONTENTS Message from the Master . 5 Message from the Development Office . 11 Commemoration of Benefactors . 14 Remembering Hugh Sykes Davies . 20 After-dinner Speech by Clifford Evans . 29 A Legal Eagle . 34 Spirit of the Brits . 36 Going Down 1949 . 44 Twenty-five Years of Women at St John’s . 46 Bicentenary of the Act for the Abolition of the Slave Trade . 49 Hidden in Plain Sight: Slavery and Justice in Rhode Island . 52 St John’s Most Historical Moment? . 63 Book Reviews . 80 Obituaries . 96 College Societies . .125 Photography Competition . 164 College Sports . 172 College Notes . 211 Fellows’ Appointments and Distinctions . 219 Members’ News . 221 Donations to the Library . 283 Errata . 296 MESSAGE FROM THE MASTER There is much to take cheer from in the events of the past year, and it is my privilege to select here a few items for closer scrutiny. I also take the opportunity to make a few valedictory remarks about the College and its future.
    [Show full text]
  • Problem-Based Learning Pedagogies: Psychological Processes and Enhancement of Intelligences
    APERA Conference 2006 28 – 30 November 2006 Hong Kong Problem-based learning pedagogies: Psychological processes and enhancement of intelligences TAN, Oon-Seng National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Introduction: Some Reflections on “Problems” Since ancient times whether it be Greek civilisation during the time of Aristotle (1926), Roman civilization during the time of Cicero (1942) or Chinese civilization in the period of the 100 schools (Loewe & Shaughnessy, 1999), there was recognition of some sort that good teaching and helping people to learn involves the employment of a spectrum of rhetoric and pictorial representation of scenarios. Art, music, role play, parables, real and fictitious stories and the use of problem scenarios were often employed. Fast forward to today. We see problems as really problematic today. Some things are implicit when we talk about a problem: (1) we recognize that there is a problem, (2) we do not know how to resolve the problem, (3) we want to resolve it, and (4) we perceive that we are able to find a solution. Examples of the types of problem triggers and stimuli include the following (Tan, 2003): (i) failure to perform, (ii) situations in need of immediate attention or improvement, (iii) finding better and new ways to do things, (iv) unexplained phenomena or observations (v) gaps in information and knowledge, (v) decision-making problems, (vi) need for new designs or inventions. The 21st century calls for the increasing ability to cope with change and to adapt. The problems confronting the world and individuals will come with increasing rapidity, complexity and diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Pedagogical Knowledge Training on the Development Of
    International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE) Volume 3, Issue 7, July 2016, PP 68-86 ISSN 2349-0373 (Print) & ISSN 2349-0381 (Online) http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.0307007 www.arcjournals.org The Effect of Pedagogical Knowledge Training on the Development of Inclusive Practices for Primary School Teachers: The Case of Buea Sub-Division, South West Region of Cameroon Ambei Ruhama Faizefu. Ph.D. Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education, University of Buea, Cameroon Research Consultant: Foundation of Scientific Research, Community Based Rehabilitation and Advocacy on Inclusive Education‖ (FORCAIE-Cameroon) [email protected] Abstract: This quasi-experimental study focused on the pedagogical knowledge base of teachers that promotes inclusive practices in ordinary schools in Buea Sub-Division of the South West Region of Cameroon. The study was based on the framework that teacher quality is an important factor in determining gains in learner achievement in inclusive settings, even after accounting for prior learner learning and family background characteristics. Theoretically, the present study was based on six theories: Bloom’s 1956 Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, B.F. Skinner’s 1938 Theory of Operant Conditioning, Jerome Bruner’s 1966 Theory of Instruction, Bernstein’s 1990 Theory of Pedagogic Discourse, Lee Shulman’s 1987 Theory of Pedagogical Reasoning and Action and The theory of planned behavior (TPB), outlined by Icek Ajzen in 1988.The sample of this study consisted of two ordinary primary schools and forty (40) ordinary primary school teachers selected from Government Practicing Primary School Buea Town (20) and Kingston Memorial Nursery and Primary Bilingual School Buea (20).
    [Show full text]
  • Symposium Session 1 Motivation Theory Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow: Reflections of Founders and Descendants
    2017 AERA MOTIVATION in EDUCATION SIG PROGRAM April 27-May 1, San Antonio, TX Dates and room assignments will be posted by AERA in February. INVITED TALK “Motivation Theory and Intervention: Progress and Prospects” Presenter: Judith Harackiewicz, University of Wisconsin Chair: Ellen L. Usher, University of Kentucky Session Organizer: Hadley J. Solomon, University of New Hampshire SYMPOSIA Symposium Session 1 Motivation Theory Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow: Reflections of Founders and Descendants Discussant: Allan L. Wigfield, University of Maryland - College Park (Chair) Chair: Alison C. Koenka, The Ohio State University (Session Organizer) Co-Sponsor: Division C—Learning and Instruction Researchers have learned much about motivation and its relations to important achievement and broader life outcomes. Over the last 50 years there have been several major theoretical models of motivation guiding much of this research; these models continue to be the dominant ones in the field. The purpose of this symposium is to bring together researchers who either developed these models or contributed much to them to: 1) present their views of the current status of the model and its future directions; and 2) interact among themselves and with the audience about major issues future research on motivation and the theoretical models guiding that research both need to resolve. Attribution Theory Bernard Weiner, University of California - Los Angeles (Presenting Author) Expectancy-Value Theory Jacquelynne Eccles, University of California - Irvine (Presenting
    [Show full text]
  • Shulman Vita 2008
    LEE S. SHULMAN 1040 Cathcart Way Stanford, CA 94305 650-494-8864 650-494-0533 fax [email protected] [email protected] President Emeritus, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching President, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1997-2008 Charles E. Ducommun Professor of Education Emeritus, Stanford University, 1998-Present Charles E. Ducommun Professor of Education, Stanford University, 1989-1998 Professor of Education & Psychology, Stanford University, 1982-2000 Professor of Educational Psychology & Medical Education, Michigan State University, 1968-1982 Director & Co-Director, Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University, 1976-1981 Assistant & Associate Professor of Educational Psychology, Michigan State University, 1963-1968 Education B.A. The College (concentration in Philosophy), University of Chicago, 1955-1959 M.A., Ph.D. Educational Psychology, University of Chicago, 1959-1963 Honorary Doctorates: University of Judaism, 1986 Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1995 Hebrew Union College, 1995 Michigan State University, 1996 University of the Pacific, 1997 Drury University, 1999 University of Aveiro, Portugal, 1999 Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, 2001 SUNY Oswego, 2004 Wabash College, 2005 Clark University, 2007 Loyola Marymount University, 2007 University of Toronto, June 2007 Pennsylvania State University, 2008 Jefferson University of Health Sciences, 2008 Duquesne University, 2011 The Freie Universitat of Berlin, 2012 Academic Honors & Professional
    [Show full text]
  • A Theory of Motivation for Some Classroom Experiences
    Journal of Educational Psychology 1979, Vol. 71, No. 1,3-25 A Theory of Motivation for Some Classroom Experiences Bernard Weiner University of California, Los Angeles A theory of motivation based upon attributions of causality for success and failure is offered. The heart of the theory consists of an identification of the dimensions of causality and the relation of these underlying properties of causes to psychological consequences. Three central causal dimensions have been discerned: stability, locus, and control; these dimensions, respectively, are linked with expectancy change, esteem-related emotions, and interperso- nal judgments. Within achievement-related contexts, this theory is pertinent to a diverse array of phenomena and topics, including self-esteem mainte- nance, achievement-change programs, reinforcement schedules, hopelessness, sources of emotion, helping, evaluation, and liking. The range of the theory is further demonstrated by applications to hyperactivity, mastery, parole deci- sions, loneliness and affiliation, and depression. It appears that a general theory of motivation is under development that has important implications for the understanding of classroom thought and behavior. The attributional approach to classroom certain laws, while other notions remain motivation and experience has proven ex- unchanged. ceedingly rich. In this article I examine the particular attributional path I have followed and document its richness by outlining a few The Search for Causes of the empirical and theoretical relations A central assumption of attribution that appear to be conclusive. The extensity theory, which sets it apart from pleasure- of the theoretical network suggests that a pain theories of motivation, is that the search general theory of motivation is under de- for understanding is the (or a) basic "spring velopment; I also address the issue of theo- of action." This does not imply that hu- retical breadth here.
    [Show full text]
  • A Professional Development Study of Technology Education in Secondary Science Teaching in Benin: Issues of Teacher Change and Self-Efficacy Beliefs
    A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT STUDY OF TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION IN SECONDARY SCIENCE TEACHING IN BENIN: ISSUES OF TEACHER CHANGE AND SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS A dissertation submitted to the Kent State University College and Graduate School of Education, Health, and Human Services in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of philosophy by Razacki Raphael E. D. Kelani May, 2009 A dissertation written by Razacki Raphael E. D. Kelani Maîtrise es-Sciences in Physiques, National University of Benin, 1990 C.A.P.E.S. National University of Benin, 1992 M.A., Kent State University, 2004 Ph. D., Kent State University, 2009 Approved by _________________________________, Co-Director, Doctoral Kenneth H. Cushner Dissertation Committee _________________________________, Co-Director, Doctoral Claudia Khourey-Bowers Dissertation Committee _________________________________, Members, Doctoral Andrew Gilbert Dissertation Committee _________________________________, Members, Doctoral Rafa M. Kasim Dissertation Committee Accepted by _________________________________, Interim Chairperson, Department of Teaching Alexa Sandmann Leadership, and Curriculum Studies _________________________________, Dean, College and Graduate School of Daniel F. Mahony Education, Health, and Human Services ii KELANI, RAZACKI RAPHAEL E. D., Ph.D., May 2009 Teaching Leadership and Curriculum Studies A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT STUDY OF TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION IN SECONDARY SCIENCE TEACHING IN BENIN: ISSUES OF TEACHER CHANGE AND SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS (210 pp.) Co-Directors of Dissertation: Kenneth H. Cushner, Ed.D. Claudia Khourey-Bowers, Ph.D. This study has two purposes. The practical purpose of the study was to provide Benin middle school science teachers with an effective technology education professional development (TEPD) program which granted teachers with content knowledge in technology education (TE), PCK in TE, design hands-on models in TE, and design rubrics assessing students’ works.
    [Show full text]
  • And Attributional Style
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1993 The Teacher Efficacy Construct and Its Relationshipo t Attributional Dimensions (Causal Attributions) and Attributional Style Charlene Marie Hopp Conarty Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Hopp Conarty, Charlene Marie, "The Teacher Efficacy Construct and Its Relationshipo t Attributional Dimensions (Causal Attributions) and Attributional Style" (1993). Dissertations. 3291. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/3291 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1993 Charlene Marie Hopp Conarty THE TEACHER EFFICACY CONSTRUCT AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO ATTRIBUTIONAL DIMENSIONS (CAUSAL ATTRIBUTIONS) AND ATTRIBUTIONAL STYLE BY CHARLENE MARIE HOPP CONARTY A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of ,the Graduate School of Loyola University of Chicago in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 1993 Copyright, 1993 Charlene Marie Hopp Conarty All rights reserved. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank Dr. Barney Berlin for his help, humor, and unfailing support in the completion of this project. I also wish to thank Dr.Joy Rogers for her guidance and support through the chaos, and Dr. Jack Kavanagh for his assistance and expertise. I am indebted to my family: my mother, my son, and Doreen for their clerical assistance in the completion of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • A Proposal for the Adoption of Research-Based Interventions by Instructors for Law School Research Classes in American Law Schools
    University of Tennessee Law Legal Scholarship Repository: A Service of the Joel A. Katz Library UTK Law Faculty Publications 7-2019 A Proposal for the Adoption of Research-Based Interventions by Instructors for Law School Research Classes in American Law Schools Nathan A. Preuss Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.law.utk.edu/utklaw_facpubs Part of the Law Commons Running Head: INTERVENTIONS FOR LAW SCHOOL RESEARCH 1 CLASSES A Proposal for the Adoption of Research-Based Interventions by Instructors for Law School Research Classes in American Law Schools Nathan A. Preuss, Associate Professor and Reference Librarian The University of Tennessee, Knoxville College of Law Joel A. Katz Law Library 105 Law Complex: Law Library And Classroom Addition, 1505 Cumberland Avenue Knoxville, TN 37996-1800 Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3843875 INTERVENTIONS FOR LAW SCHOOL RESEARCH CLASSES 2 Abstract This paper identifies educational motivation issues in the law student population; particularly in required legal research courses. The author summarizes two relevant psychological theories widely applied in educational contexts: expectancy-value theory and attributional theory. Intervention methods to reduce or eliminate these motivational problems are suggested. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3843875 INTERVENTIONS FOR LAW SCHOOL RESEARCH CLASSES 3 Table of Contents ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How Teachers Teach: Mapping the Terrain of Practice
    How Teachers Teach: Mapping the Terrain of Practice Gary Sykes Educational Testing Service Princeton, NJ Suzanne Wilson University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 2015 Copyright © 2015 Educational Testing Service. All Rights Reserved. ETS and the ETS logo are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service (ETS). MEASURING THE POWER OF LEARNING is a trademark of ETS. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. Acknowledgments The authors appreciate support in reviewing literature and assisting in report preparation provided by Andrew Croft, David Kirui, Yi Qi, Meghan Schramm-Possinger, Melissa Siesputowski, and Margaret Wilson. And we wish to thank a great many colleagues who shared their thoughts, feedback, and critique of this report through several prior versions. A list of these individuals is appended at the end of this report. Their contributions strengthened the report; any further deficiencies are ours. How Teachers Teach: Mapping the Terrain of Practice i Authors’ Note Gary Sykes is a senior research director in the Understanding Teaching Quality Center at Educational Testing Service (ETS). He joined ETS after 25 years on the faculty at Michigan State University (MSU), where he concentrated his scholarly and advocacy-oriented work on teaching, teacher education, and policy directed to teaching. He was active in the launch of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards and served as the research director for the Holmes Group, a network of teacher education institutions devoted to the reform of teacher education. His publications include the editorship with Lee Shulman of the Handbook of Teaching and Policy (1983), with Linda Darling-Hammond of Teaching as the Learning Profession (1999), and with Barbara Schneider and David Plank of the Handbook of Education Policy Research (2009).
    [Show full text]