The SAGE Guide to Curriculum in Education EDITORIAL BOARD
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Curriculum Vitae Quick Guide
College of Medicine Curriculum Vitae for Promotion and Tenure Quick Guide CV Section AI Screen(s) Feeding to Activity Description and Notes (In Order of Report) This Section . Personal and Contact Name and credentials, primary academic Information CV Header department, division/section, primary administrative . Yearly Data role, office location, and other contact information . Administrative Leadership Postgraduate Education Postgraduate training, including internship, . Postgraduate Education and Training residency, fellowship, and postgraduate research. and Training Education Education leading to formal academic degrees . Education Current and previous professional employment history, including academic, government, Professional hospital/agency, military, and other private/public Experience professional positions . Academic . Administrative Administrative leadership roles such as Dean, . Professional Experience . Government Program Director, Chair, and Chief will also fall . Administrative Leadership . Hospital/Agency under this section, but are to be entered on the . Other Professional Administrative Leadership screen. Committee roles will not appear here. Those roles U.S. Military Experience are to be entered on the Service screens and will fall under Service on the CV report. Honors, awards, and special recognition received Honors and Awards Distinguished professorships and endowed . Honors and Awards positions should be captured here. Specialty certification that is required for professional practice within your discipline . Board Certification, Board Certification Certification received as a result of continuing Practice Certification, and education will not appear here. That should be Licensure entered on the Professional Growth and Development screen. Professional licensure required for professional practice within your discipline . Board Certification, Licensure License numbers will be captured in the system, but Practice Certification, and will not appear on the CV report. -
Pedagogy, Curriculum, Teaching Practices and Teacher Education in Developing Countries
Pedagogy, curriculum, teaching practices and teacher education in developing countries EVIDENCE BRIEF The evidence suggests that when teachers see pedagogy as entailing communication with students they use practices in interactive ways that mean that learning is more likely to take place: the ‘how’ is more important than ‘what’ teachers do. drawing on students’ alignment of professional About this brief backgrounds and experiences. development with teachers’ This paper summaries evidence Six practices used in interactive needs, the promoted pedagogy from a DFID-funded review by ways by effective teachers were and in-class monitoring of Westbrook et al. (2013), entitled more likely to enhance learning: teachers Pedagogy, Curriculum, Teaching support from head teachers demonstration and explanation, Practices and Teacher Education alignment of forms of drawing on subject knowledge in Developing Countries, produced assessment with the school flexible use of whole-class, group by the University of Sussex. The curriculum. review identifies pedagogic and pair work where students practices that most effectively discuss a shared task Practices were disabled by support all students to learn, and frequent, relevant use of learning misalignment of: determines ways that these can be materials beyond the textbook initial teacher training with the supported by teacher education open and closed questioning, school curriculum and the school curriculum. expanding responses, Continuing professional encouraging questioning development with the promoted This brief provides an overview of use of local languages and code pedagogy the strength of evidence, key switching (switching between two the school curriculum with findings and theory of change, to languages within a sentence to assessment. assist policy makers and ensure understanding) Further disabling factors were: researchers in assessing the planning and varying lesson poor communication with the evidence in this field. -
EDUCATION in CHINA a Snapshot This Work Is Published Under the Responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD
EDUCATION IN CHINA A Snapshot This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Photo credits: Cover: © EQRoy / Shutterstock.com; © iStock.com/iPandastudio; © astudio / Shutterstock.com Inside: © iStock.com/iPandastudio; © li jianbing / Shutterstock.com; © tangxn / Shutterstock.com; © chuyuss / Shutterstock.com; © astudio / Shutterstock.com; © Frame China / Shutterstock.com © OECD 2016 You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgement of OECD as source and copyright owner is given. All requests for public or commercial use and translation rights should be submitted to [email protected]. Requests for permission to photocopy portions of this material for public or commercial use shall be addressed directly to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) at [email protected] or the Centre français d’exploitation du droit de copie (CFC) at [email protected]. Education in China A SNAPSHOT Foreword In 2015, three economies in China participated in the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment, or PISA, for the first time: Beijing, a municipality, Jiangsu, a province on the eastern coast of the country, and Guangdong, a southern coastal province. -
The Neighborhood School Curriculum Outline
The Neighborhood School Curriculum Outline 2008-2009 Curriculum is at the heart of our school. It is born of the interests and developmental capacity of the children and the goals and knowledge of the teachers. We understand that children are learning to make sense of the world. They need to be equipped to live in the world. We work with each child to further that child’s academic and social development. The curriculum provides opportunities for children to find new areas of interest and strength as they grow, to present their ideas and be well spoken and self assured in public presentations. Children develop a sense of responsibility towards the community through their group work, as well as towards their own individual learning. We provide children with work that is real. We look at what real writers do, what good readers to in order to build curriculum that is important and relevant to the lives of the children. We teach children to be researchers from pre- kindergarten up through 5th grade and to reflect on their experiences to ask questions and learn. We assess children through looking at collections of their work, through observing them work and participate in class activities, by keeping notes on their progress and through conferencing with them about their work. Every spring, each grade level and the administration meet to decide the curriculum for the following year. Our mixed age classes are on a two year cycle of curriculum, to match the two years the children are in the classes. We choose topics and areas of study that are important and worthwhile, that spark the ideas of children, that provide a platform for later learning. -
Chapter 4: Putting It Into Practice: Curriculum and Pedagogy
3XWWLQJLWLQWRSUDFWLFH 4 &XUULFXOXPDQGSHGDJRJ\ 4.1 Curriculum, from the Latin for ‘course’, is the content or subject matter that is taught. Pedagogy, from the Greek words for ‘boy’ and ‘guide’, refers to the art or science of teaching or the techniques used to teach students. The notion of a teacher guiding students through a course of study has more contemporary relevance than the content driven, ‘drill and skill’, approaches that characterised schooling until the last few decades of the 1900s. 4.2 Good teachers have always, through sound and supportive teacher/student relationships, guided students through what they need and want to learn. This chapter considers the importance of relevant curricula and engaging pedagogy in promoting learning as well as the methods used to assess student achievement. Curriculum and pedagogy 4.3 If the definitions of curriculum and pedagogy are clear, the separation of the two in classrooms is not. While the curriculum is the content that education departments mandate must be taught, classroom teachers have significant responsibility for, and control over, how the curriculum is presented and delivered. In practice, an inspired and talented teacher can energise dull content and find ways to link it to real life while a mediocre or unmotivated teacher can compromise the appeal of the most relevant and imaginative curriculum by poor delivery. 4.4 The research at Flinders University by Slade and Trent indicates that boys are aware of and reactive to what they view to be irrelevant curriculum and poor teaching. Boys see curriculum and pedagogy as inseparable from each other and from other aspects of schooling. -
Middle School Curriculum Guide 2017-2018
MIDDLE SCHOOL CURRICULUM GUIDE 2017-2018 As a member of the Princeton Day School community, I will pursue excellence in scholarship and character. I will try to be trustworthy, kind, honest, and fair; give my best in and out of the classroom and on the playing field; be respectful of myself, of property, and of all members of our community; take responsibility for my actions; maintain a sense of humor. Welcome to the Middle School at Princeton Day School, a lively and engaging place for students in grades 5 through 8. Our goal is to create a culture where students feel safe, valued, celebrated and known. The quote above is on a plaque in the Middle School, and it truly captures what we strive for here at Princeton Day School. In the Middle School at PDS, we encourage our students to be involved in activities both in and out of the classroom. We encourage them to take risks and value their own voice in the classroom. We believe in giving students opportunities to make mistakes, and then learn from them in a caring and supportive environment. In addition, we place great emphasis on keeping a growth mindset. We want students to view effort as the key to success; to keep focused on continued—life-long—growth; and to keep trying even though they may experience setbacks. Class sizes are kept small, and teachers, students, and parents work very closely together. Dedicated and talented faculty foster clear, thoughtful communication between home and school, forming a partnership that values educational excellence. At Princeton Day School, we teach skills and knowledge, but also, more critically, we teach our students how to think and learn. -
The Elementary School Curriculum Table of Contents
The Elementary School Curriculum Table of Contents 1 Mission 2 School Design 4 Elementary School Curriculum 5 English Language Arts 5 Reading 7 Writing 7 Core Knowledge 8 Math 10 Science 12 Project-Based Learning 13 Field Studies 13 Blocks 14 Recess 15 Whole Child 15 The Arts 16 Gamesday 16 Chess 16 Sports 17 Special Education 17 ACTION Values and Building Moral Character 18 Parent Engagement Mission Success Academy is redefining what’s possible in public education. Our dual mission is to: Build exceptional, world-class public schools that prove children from all backgrounds can succeed in college and life; and advocate to change public policies that prevent so many children from having access to educational excellence and opportunity. School Design At Success Academy, we constantly ask ourselves: “Would our scholars choose to come to school, even if they didn’t have to?” The answer — a resounding “Yes!” — results from setting the bar high while providing endless opportunities for scholars to explore, engage, and laugh in our classrooms. From elementary school through high school, we commit ourselves to the long-term development of our scholars, supporting their ultimate success in college and in life. We tailor our engaging and rigorous approach to meet the specific needs of elementary, middle, and high school, teaching the core knowledge, critical thinking, independence, and self-advocacy skills that are essential for scholars to excel. 2 Elementary School Curriculum We designed our elementary school curriculum to help children fall in love with learning through reading voluminously, solving complex math problems, and engaging in scientific inquiry. -
Spencer Foundation Annual Report 1996
25 Twenty-five Years of Grantmaking THE SPENCER FOUNDATION 1996 ANNUAL REPORT The above quote was found in Lyle Spencer’s notes on the formation of the Foundation. The handwritten draft reads: “All the Spencer dough was earned, improb- ably, from education. It makes sense, therefore, that most of this money should be returned eventually to investigating ways in which education can be improved, around the world. Broadly conceived, wher- ever learning occurs.” The Spencer Foundation 25thAnniversary of Grantmaking TABLE OF CONTENTS iii Table of Contents v Directors, Advisors, & Staff 1 Introduction 2 Lyle M. Spencer I. THE FOUNDATION 1971-1995 6 Twenty-five Years of Grantmaking 14 Major Research Grants Program 20 Fellowship Programs 27 Small Research Grants Program 32 Current Foundation Initiatives 34 The Foundation and Chicago 36 Administrative and Financial History 40 Directors, 1971-1996 II. 1996 ANNUAL REPORT for year ended March 31, 1996 44 President’s Comments 46 Report of the Vice President 48 Application and Review Information The Foundation’s Programs: Research Programs: 52 Major Research Grants iii 53 Small Research Grants 56 The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation/ Spencer Foundation Professional Development Research Grants Fellowship Programs: 57 Spencer Dissertation Fellows 58 NAE/Spencer Postdoctoral Fellows 59 Spencer Fellows at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences 60 Spencer Senior Scholar Grants Experimental Research Training Grants Spencer Mentor Awards 61 AERA/Spencer Doctoral Research and Travel Fellows 62 Other Grants 63 Major Research Grants-in-Progress 67 Publications Received from Grantees 70 Report of the Treasurer 72 Financial Statements III. -
On Research on Teaching: a Conversation with Lee Shulman
On Research on Teaching: A Conversation with Lee Shulman Stanford Professor Lee Shulman reflects on the matter, or context, you're likely to get limitations of generalizations about a set of principles much like those of effective effective teaching. I think they are teaching and describes how case histories reasonable and warranted — although I'd offer several caveats. specific stories about classroom experience For example, those principles were can enrich our collective "wisdom of practice." developed from studies in which teachers were observed 5 or 10 times during a school year, and then the data from all 10 times were aggregated. A teacher of mathematics might be introducing the topic of estimation on day one, having the kids do guided practice on factoring on day two. preparing the kids for a quiz on the topic of expo nents on day three, and so on. So, when you collapse all that together, you're putting into the same pot a lot of very different teaching situations, even for teaching mathematics to 2nd graders. Then the researcher would correlate I the frequencies with which the teachers did a variety RON BRANDT of things in all of those sessions against the performance of the ~jpt the early 1980s, educators were Well, I think we began to realize the students two to nine months later on a i excited because we seemed to limitations of that kind of research. standardized achievement test. That's J. have the beginnings of a firm We realized that it provided answers to why the research is called "process- knowledge base for our profession. -
Problem-Based Learning Pedagogies: Psychological Processes and Enhancement of Intelligences
APERA Conference 2006 28 – 30 November 2006 Hong Kong Problem-based learning pedagogies: Psychological processes and enhancement of intelligences TAN, Oon-Seng National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Introduction: Some Reflections on “Problems” Since ancient times whether it be Greek civilisation during the time of Aristotle (1926), Roman civilization during the time of Cicero (1942) or Chinese civilization in the period of the 100 schools (Loewe & Shaughnessy, 1999), there was recognition of some sort that good teaching and helping people to learn involves the employment of a spectrum of rhetoric and pictorial representation of scenarios. Art, music, role play, parables, real and fictitious stories and the use of problem scenarios were often employed. Fast forward to today. We see problems as really problematic today. Some things are implicit when we talk about a problem: (1) we recognize that there is a problem, (2) we do not know how to resolve the problem, (3) we want to resolve it, and (4) we perceive that we are able to find a solution. Examples of the types of problem triggers and stimuli include the following (Tan, 2003): (i) failure to perform, (ii) situations in need of immediate attention or improvement, (iii) finding better and new ways to do things, (iv) unexplained phenomena or observations (v) gaps in information and knowledge, (v) decision-making problems, (vi) need for new designs or inventions. The 21st century calls for the increasing ability to cope with change and to adapt. The problems confronting the world and individuals will come with increasing rapidity, complexity and diversity. -
The Effect of Pedagogical Knowledge Training on the Development Of
International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE) Volume 3, Issue 7, July 2016, PP 68-86 ISSN 2349-0373 (Print) & ISSN 2349-0381 (Online) http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.0307007 www.arcjournals.org The Effect of Pedagogical Knowledge Training on the Development of Inclusive Practices for Primary School Teachers: The Case of Buea Sub-Division, South West Region of Cameroon Ambei Ruhama Faizefu. Ph.D. Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education, University of Buea, Cameroon Research Consultant: Foundation of Scientific Research, Community Based Rehabilitation and Advocacy on Inclusive Education‖ (FORCAIE-Cameroon) [email protected] Abstract: This quasi-experimental study focused on the pedagogical knowledge base of teachers that promotes inclusive practices in ordinary schools in Buea Sub-Division of the South West Region of Cameroon. The study was based on the framework that teacher quality is an important factor in determining gains in learner achievement in inclusive settings, even after accounting for prior learner learning and family background characteristics. Theoretically, the present study was based on six theories: Bloom’s 1956 Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, B.F. Skinner’s 1938 Theory of Operant Conditioning, Jerome Bruner’s 1966 Theory of Instruction, Bernstein’s 1990 Theory of Pedagogic Discourse, Lee Shulman’s 1987 Theory of Pedagogical Reasoning and Action and The theory of planned behavior (TPB), outlined by Icek Ajzen in 1988.The sample of this study consisted of two ordinary primary schools and forty (40) ordinary primary school teachers selected from Government Practicing Primary School Buea Town (20) and Kingston Memorial Nursery and Primary Bilingual School Buea (20). -
Shulman Vita 2008
LEE S. SHULMAN 1040 Cathcart Way Stanford, CA 94305 650-494-8864 650-494-0533 fax [email protected] [email protected] President Emeritus, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching President, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1997-2008 Charles E. Ducommun Professor of Education Emeritus, Stanford University, 1998-Present Charles E. Ducommun Professor of Education, Stanford University, 1989-1998 Professor of Education & Psychology, Stanford University, 1982-2000 Professor of Educational Psychology & Medical Education, Michigan State University, 1968-1982 Director & Co-Director, Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University, 1976-1981 Assistant & Associate Professor of Educational Psychology, Michigan State University, 1963-1968 Education B.A. The College (concentration in Philosophy), University of Chicago, 1955-1959 M.A., Ph.D. Educational Psychology, University of Chicago, 1959-1963 Honorary Doctorates: University of Judaism, 1986 Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1995 Hebrew Union College, 1995 Michigan State University, 1996 University of the Pacific, 1997 Drury University, 1999 University of Aveiro, Portugal, 1999 Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, 2001 SUNY Oswego, 2004 Wabash College, 2005 Clark University, 2007 Loyola Marymount University, 2007 University of Toronto, June 2007 Pennsylvania State University, 2008 Jefferson University of Health Sciences, 2008 Duquesne University, 2011 The Freie Universitat of Berlin, 2012 Academic Honors & Professional