DOCSLIB.ORG

Biological Resources Evaluation Aggie Research Campus Project Yolo County, CA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Biological Resources Evaluation for the Aggie Research Campus Project Yolo County, CA Prepared by: Sycamore Environmental Consultants, Inc. 6355 Riverside Blvd., Suite C Sacramento, CA 95831 Phone: 916/ 427-0703 Contact: Mike Bower, M.S., PWS #2230 Prepared for: The Buzz Oates Group of Companies 555 Capitol Mall Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: 916/ 379-3800 Contact: Troy Estacio, SVP Acquisitions & Development Services 4 February 2020 Biological Resources Evaluation Aggie Research Campus Project Yolo County, CA Biological Resources Evaluation for the Aggie Research Campus Project Yolo County, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................... 1 II. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 2 A. Purpose of Report ............................................................................................................................. 2 B. Project Location ................................................................................................................................ 2 C. Project Applicant .............................................................................................................................. 2 D. Project Description ............................................................................................................................ 3 III. STUDY METHODS ............................................................................................................................ 7 A. Studies Conducted ............................................................................................................................ 7 B. Survey Dates, Personnel, and Coverage ........................................................................................... 7 C. Literature Search ............................................................................................................................... 8 D. Field Survey Methods ....................................................................................................................... 8 E. Mapping .......................................................................................................................................... 10 F. Problems Encountered and Limitations That May Influence Results ............................................. 10 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ..................................................................................................... 11 A. Soils................................................................................................................................................. 11 B. Weather and Climate Conditions .................................................................................................... 14 C. Biological Communities ................................................................................................................. 14 1. Field Crops .............................................................................................................................. 18 2. Deciduous Fruit/Nut ................................................................................................................ 18 3. Semiagricultural/Incidental to Agriculture .............................................................................. 18 4. Mace Drainage Channel .......................................................................................................... 19 5. Urban or Built Up .................................................................................................................... 20 6. Urban Ruderal ......................................................................................................................... 20 D. The Existing Level of Disturbance ................................................................................................. 20 V. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES IN THE BIOLOGICAL STUDY AREA .................................... 21 A. Determination of Special-Status Species in the Biological Study Area .......................................... 21 B. Special-Status Species not in the Biological Study Area ................................................................ 23 C. Evaluation of Special-Status Wildlife Species ................................................................................ 23 1. Invertebrates ............................................................................................................................ 23 2. Reptiles .................................................................................................................................... 24 3. Birds ........................................................................................................................................ 26 4. Mammals ................................................................................................................................. 34 D. Evaluation of Special-Status Plant Species ..................................................................................... 34 ARC_BRE_Feb2020.docx 2/4/2020 Sycamore Environmental Consultants, Inc. ii Biological Resources Evaluation Aggie Research Campus Project Yolo County, CA E. Evaluation of Special-Status Natural Communities ........................................................................ 40 F. Potentially Jurisdictional Waters .................................................................................................... 40 G. Evaluation of Trees ......................................................................................................................... 40 VI. LITERATURE CITED & PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS.................................................. 42 A. Literature Cited ............................................................................................................................... 42 B. Personal Communications ............................................................................................................... 46 VII. PREPARERS ..................................................................................................................................... 47 FIGURES Figure 1. Project Location ............................................................................................................................ 5 Figure 2. Aerial Photograph ......................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 3. Soils Map .................................................................................................................................... 13 Figure 4. Biological Resources Map .......................................................................................................... 16 TABLES Table 1. Survey Dates and Personnel........................................................................................................... 7 Table 2. USGS Quads Evaluated for the Aggie Research Campus Project ................................................. 8 Table 3. Biological Communities and Other Features in the BSA ............................................................ 15 Table 4. Special-Status Species with the Potential to Occur in the BSA ................................................... 22 Table 5. Summary of Potentially Affected Trees....................................................................................... 41 APPENDICES Appendix A. Plant and Wildlife Species Observed Appendix B. USFWS Species List Appendix C. CNDDB Summary Report and CNPS Inventory Query Appendix D. Photographs Appendix E. Species Evaluated Table Appendix F. Map of GGS Habitat by the Yolo Heritage Program Appendix G. Preliminary Burrowing Owl Survey Results Appendix H. Map of Yolo HCP/NCCP Resource Avoidance Buffers Appendix I. GGS Habitat Evaluation ARC_BRE_Feb2020.docx 2/4/2020 Sycamore Environmental Consultants, Inc. iii Biological Resources Evaluation Aggie Research Campus Project Yolo County, CA I. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS This biological resources evaluation report documents baseline biological conditions for the Aggie Research Campus (ARC) Project. The 815-ac biological study area (BSA) includes the 185-ac ARC site and several off-site areas, including non-project parcels proposed to annexed by the City, two sewer alignment alternatives, and parcels east of the ARC project where stormwater capacity improvements are contemplated. The BSA for the ARC Project is similar to the area studied for the Mace Ranch Innovation Center (MRIC) Project. This report incorporates and updates the results of an earlier biological resources evaluation and accompanying technical studies conducted for the MRIC Project in 2015. Surveys conducted in support of the ARC Project include general biological surveys, protocol botanical surveys, a wetland and hydrologic monitoring surveys, an arborist survey, targeted burrowing owl surveys, and CDFW (2012) guideline surveys for burrowing owl (ongoing). Surveys conducted 2014 through 2020 document the following biological resources that could be affected by the ARC Project: • Five elderberry shrubs, the host plant for the federally threatened valley elderberry longhorn beetle (VELB), are present in the Campus BSA and areas within 200 ft. The shrubs are isolated, in non-riparian contexts. No potential VELB exit holes were observed on the elderberry shrubs. • Suitable aquatic habitat
Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."

    "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."

    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
  • Chemical and Biological Potential of Ammi Visnaga (L.) Lam

    Chemical and Biological Potential of Ammi Visnaga (L.) Lam

    J. Adv. Biomed. & Pharm. Sci. 4 (2021) 160-176 Journal of Advanced Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences Journal Homepage: http://jabps.journals.ekb.eg Chemical and Biological Potential of Ammi visnaga (L.) Lam. and Apium graveolens L.: A Review (1963-2020) Shereen S. T. Ahmed1*, John R. Fahim1, Usama R. Abdelmohsen1,2, Ashraf N. E. Hamed1* 1 Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, Minia 61519, Egypt. 2 Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Deraya University, New Minia 61111, Egypt. Received: January 3, 2021; revised: June 17, 2021; accepted: June 26, 2021 Abstract Medicinal plants have a vital role in our life, providing us with a variety of secondary metabolites with varied chemical structures and biological activities. Ammi visnaga (L.) Lam. and Apium graveolens L. are common traditional plant species that have long been used for the prevention and treatment of several health problems. Both A. visnaga and A. graveolens belong to the carrot family, Apiaceae (Umbelliferae) and showed different groups of natural compounds, such as coumarins, furanochromones, flavonoids and essential oils. In view of that, the current review describes various classes of chemical constituents identified so far from these medicinal species, together with their valued pharmacological and therapeutic effects. Key words Ammi visnaga, Apium graveolens, Apiaceae (Umbelliferae), Natural products, Biological activities. 1. Introduction comprehensive list of the previously isolated compounds from A. visnaga is presented in Table 1 and Figure 1. Family Apiaceae (Umbelliferae) is a family of aromatic and flowering plants, known as celery, carrot or parsley family, 2.1.2. Biological review or simply as umbellifers. It includes more than 3000–3750 species in 300–455 genera.
  • Tidal Marsh Recovery Plan Habitat Creation Or Enhancement Project Within 5 Miles of OAK

    Tidal Marsh Recovery Plan Habitat Creation Or Enhancement Project Within 5 Miles of OAK

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California California clapper rail Suaeda californica Cirsium hydrophilum Chloropyron molle Salt marsh harvest mouse (Rallus longirostris (California sea-blite) var. hydrophilum ssp. molle (Reithrodontomys obsoletus) (Suisun thistle) (soft bird’s-beak) raviventris) Volume II Appendices Tidal marsh at China Camp State Park. VII. APPENDICES Appendix A Species referred to in this recovery plan……………....…………………….3 Appendix B Recovery Priority Ranking System for Endangered and Threatened Species..........................................................................................................11 Appendix C Species of Concern or Regional Conservation Significance in Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California….......................................13 Appendix D Agencies, organizations, and websites involved with tidal marsh Recovery.................................................................................................... 189 Appendix E Environmental contaminants in San Francisco Bay...................................193 Appendix F Population Persistence Modeling for Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California with Intial Application to California clapper rail …............................................................................209 Appendix G Glossary……………......................................................................………229 Appendix H Summary of Major Public Comments and Service
  • 0506 NVC Student Housing Admin Draft ISMND.Docx

    0506 NVC Student Housing Admin Draft ISMND.Docx

    Napa Valley College Student Housing Project Initial Study / Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration August 12, 2020 Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Napa Valley College Student Housing Project Prepared for: Napa Valley Community College District 2277 Napa-Vallejo Highway Napa, CA 94558 Prepared by: GHD Inc. 2235 Mercury Way, Suite 150 Santa Rosa, California 95407 August 12, 2020 Napa Valley College Student Housing Project – Initial Study/Proposed MND Table of Contents Project Information ..................................................................................................................... 1-1 Introduction and CEQA Requirements ........................................................................... 1-1 CEQA Lead Agency Contact Information ....................................................................... 1-1 Project Background and Objectives ............................................................................... 1-1 Project Description ......................................................................................................... 1-2 Environmental Protection Actions Incorporated Into the Proposed Project ................... 1-9 Required Agency Approvals ......................................................................................... 1-12 Tribal Consultation ........................................................................................................ 1-12 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ..............................................................................
  • Vitro Grown Microshoots and Callus Cultures of Ammi Visnaga (L.) Lam

    Vitro Grown Microshoots and Callus Cultures of Ammi Visnaga (L.) Lam

    Volume 12, Number 1,March 2019 ISSN 1995-6673 JJBS Pages 43 - 48 Jordan Journal of Biological Sciences Investigating the Antimicrobial Potential of in- vitro Grown Microshoots and Callus Cultures of Ammi visnaga (L.) Lam. Majd M. Al-Saleh1, Rida A. Shibli1*, Hamzah M. Al-Qadiri2, Reham W. Tahtamouni3, Maysaa M. Darwish4 and Tamara S. Al- Qudah1 1 Hamdi Mango Center for Scientific Research (HMCSR),2Department of Nutrition and Food Technology, School of Agriculture, University of Jordan, 3Department of Applied and Social Sciences, Princess Alia University College, Al-Balqa Applied University, 4National Center for Agriculture Research and Extension, Amman, Jordan.. Received May 9, 2018; Revised July 1, 2018; Accepted July 10, 2018 Abstract Ammi visnaga (L.) Lam is a valuable herbal plant that is frequently collected for medicinal purposes. This study is conducted to evaluate the antimicrobial potential of the in-vitro grown microshoots and callus cultures of this plant against selected strains of bacteria and fungi. Shoot multiplication was obtained in MS medium containing 0.5 mg/L BA + 0.1 mg/L NAA, while callus multiplication was performed on MS medium containing 1.0 mg/L BA + 2.0 mg/L 2,4-D under light conditions. The aqueous and methanolic extracts were prepared from both culture types in addition to in-vivo grown plant material to experiment their antimicrobial activities. Generally, the in-vitro extracts of the microshoots and the callus cultures acted best against bacteria compared to the field plant extract. Moreover, the methanolic extracts were generally found to exhibit far better results and resistance against the tested microbes than the aqueous extracts.
  • Vascular Plant Species with Documented Or Recorded Occurrence in Placer County

    Vascular Plant Species with Documented Or Recorded Occurrence in Placer County

    A PPENDIX II Vascular Plant Species with Documented or Reported Occurrence in Placer County APPENDIX II. Vascular Plant Species with Documented or Reported Occurrence in Placer County Family Scientific Name Common Name FERN AND FERN ALLIES Azollaceae Mosquito fern family Azolla filiculoides Pacific mosquito fern Dennstaedtiaceae Bracken family Pteridium aquilinum var.pubescens Bracken fern Dryopteridaceae Wood fern family Athyrium alpestre var. americanum Alpine lady fern Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosorum Lady fern Cystopteris fragilis Fragile fern Polystichum imbricans ssp. curtum Cliff sword fern Polystichum imbricans ssp. imbricans Imbricate sword fern Polystichum kruckebergii Kruckeberg’s hollyfern Polystichum lonchitis Northern hollyfern Polystichum munitum Sword fern Equisetaceae Horsetail family Equisetum arvense Common horsetail Equisetum hyemale ssp. affine Scouring rush Equisetum laevigatum Smooth horsetail Isoetaceae Quillwort family Isoetes bolanderi Bolander’s quillwort Isoetes howellii Howell’s quillwort Isoetes orcuttii Orcutt’s quillwort Lycopodiaceae Club-moss family Lycopodiella inundata Bog club-moss Marsileaceae Marsilea family Marsilea vestita ssp. vestita Water clover Pilularia americana American pillwort Ophioglossaceae Adder’s-tongue family Botrychium multifidum Leathery grapefern Polypodiaceae Polypody family Polypodium hesperium Western polypody Pteridaceae Brake family Adiantum aleuticum Five-finger maidenhair Adiantum jordanii Common maidenhair fern Aspidotis densa Indian’s dream Cheilanthes cooperae Cooper’s
  • Classification, Ecological Characterization, and Presence of Listed Plant Taxa of Vernal Pool Associations in California

    Classification, Ecological Characterization, and Presence of Listed Plant Taxa of Vernal Pool Associations in California

    Barbour et al.: Vernal pools Draft Final Report; May/07 1 FINAL REPORT, 15 May 2007 CLASSIFICATION, ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION, AND PRESENCE OF LISTED PLANT TAXA OF VERNAL POOL ASSOCIATIONS IN CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE AGREEMENT/STUDY NO. 814205G238 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS ACCOUNT NO. 3-APSF026 , SUBACCOUNT NO. FMGB2 SUBMITTED BY: PROFESSOR MICHAEL G. BARBOUR PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR, DR. AYZIK I. SOLOMESHCH, MS. JENNIFER J. BUCK WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM: ROBERT F. HOLLAND CAROL W. WITHAM RODERICK L. MACDONALD SANDRA L. STARR KRISTI A. LAZAR Barbour et al.: Vernal pools Draft Final Report; May/07 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS: Executive summary 3 Chapter 1. Introduction 8 Structure of the report 10 Chapter 2. Classification of vernal pool plant communities 12 Previous classifications 12 Materials and methods 15 Results 18 Class Lastenia fremontii-Downingia bicornuta 18 Key to Central Valley communities 19 Descriptions of community types 20 Alliance Lasthenia glaberrima 20 Alliance Lupinus bicolor-Eryngium aristulatum 28 Alliance downingia bocornuta-Lasthenia fremontii 29 Alliance Layia fremontii-Achyrachaena mollis 34 Alliance Montia fontana-Sidalcea calycosa 35 Alliance Frankenia salina-Lasthenia fremontii 36 Alliance Cressa truxillensis-Distichlis spicata of playas and alkali sinks 44 Central Valley vernal pools in a California-wide context 48 Discussion 50 Chapter 3. Persistence of diagnostic species and community types 56 Chapter 4. Presence of listed plants in Central Valley communities 64 Results and duscussion
  • Screening of Phytochemical and Antibacterial Activities

    Screening of Phytochemical and Antibacterial Activities

    SCREENING OF PHYTOCHEMICAL AND ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITIES OF LEAVES OF SELECTED MEDICINAL PLANTS FORM Al-KHUMS, LIBYA *Salem Mohamed Edrah 1, Fouzy Alafid2, 1Chemistry Department, Science College, El- Mergeb University, Al-Khums Libya *Author & Corresponding Author: [email protected], Tel: +218924748909 2Institute of Organic Chemistry and Technology, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Czech Republic Abstract: Human beings benefit from medicinal plants to make life healthy and free from disease. Medicinal properties of plants perform them effective to halt or remedy disease. The present study was to evaluate the phytochemical constituents and antibacterial activity assessment of Crude extract (aqueous and ethanolic) leaves of three medicinally significant plants (Zygophyllum, Ammi visnaga and Rhus tripartita). Qualitative screening of phytochemical components such as Tannins, Phlobatanins, Saponins, Flavonoids, Steroids, Alkaloids, Anthraquinones, Coumarins, Terpenoids and Cardiac Glycosides were present in both extracts whilst steroids not present in all aqueous extracts of these plants and Anthraquinones present only in the Rhus tripartita in aqueous and ethanolic extracts. Whereas the Quantitive screening of phytochemical components percentage’s yields of Zygophyllum, Ammi visnaga and Rhus tripartita were 33%, 26% and 29% respectively, while the percentage’s yields of alkaloids were found as 2.4, 8 and 8.5% correspondingly, and the percentage’s yields of saponins were found as 7.6, 6 and 3.2% respectively. And the percentage’s yields of flavonoids were 9.6, 10 and 8.7% individually. Furthermore, the biological importance of these compounds together with the use of these plants in traditional medicine also encouraged us to investigate it for antibacterial activity. For this determination, the crude extracts (Aqueous and Ethanolic) of the leaves were used.
  • Suisun City General Plan

    Suisun City General Plan

    B IOLOGICAL R ESOURCES B ACKGROUND R EPORT Biological Resources In This Background Report Page Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 3 Environmental Setting ............................................................................................................... 3 Habitat Types ......................................................................................................................... 3 Sensitive Biological Resources ................................................................................................ 9 Sensitive Habitats ................................................................................................................. 10 Regulatory Setting ................................................................................................................... 40 Federal Plans, Policies, Regulations, and Laws ...................................................................... 41 State Plans, Policies, Regulations, and Laws ......................................................................... 43 Regional and Local Plans, Policies, Regulations, and Ordinances .......................................... 44 General Plan Issues and Opportunities ..................................................................................... 46 References ............................................................................................................................... 47 P AGE BIO‐ 1 C ITY OF
  • Vegetation Alliances of Western Riverside County, California

    Vegetation Alliances of Western Riverside County, California

    Vegetation Alliances of Western Riverside County, California By Anne Klein and Julie Evens California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento CA, 95816 Final report prepared for The California Department of Fish and Game Habitat Conservation Division Contract Number: P0185404 August 2005 (Revised April 2006) TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................1 METHODS .......................................................................................................................................................1 Study area.................................................................................................................................................1 Figure 1. Study area in Western Riverside County within Southern California, showing ecological subsections...............................................................................................................................................3 Sampling...................................................................................................................................................4 Figure 2. Locations of field surveys within Western Riverside County.....................................................5 Existing Literature Review ........................................................................................................................7 Cluster analyses for vegetation classification...........................................................................................7
  • Cramvernal Pool Endemics-Final.Pdf

    Cramvernal Pool Endemics-Final.Pdf

    Vernal Pool Systems and Individual Vernal Pools Version 6.1 APPENDIX 1 Vernal Pool Endemic Plant List Use this list to determine if a species is a vernal pool endemic Bsed on Appendix C from: T. Keeler-Wolf, D.R. Elam, K. Lewis, S.A. Flint. 1998. California Vernal Pool Assessment Preliminary Report. State of California, The Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Game. 161 pp. www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/wetlands/pdfs/VernalPoolAssessmentPreliminaryReport.pdf May 2013 ! CRAM%Vernal%Pool%Endemic%Plants%List May%2013 Scientific%Name Family Genus Species infraspecific_rank %infraspecific_epithet Agrostis(elliottiana POACEAE Agrostis elliottiana Agrostis(hendersonii POACEAE Agrostis hendersonii Agrostis(microphylla POACEAE Agrostis microphylla Alopecurus(carolinianus POACEAE Alopecurus carolinianus Alopecurus(saccatus POACEAE Alopecurus saccatus Anagallis(minima MYRSINACEAE Anagallis minima Astragalus(tener(var.(ferrisiae FABACEAE Astragalus tener var. ferrisiae Astragalus(tener(var.(tener FABACEAE Astragalus tener var. tener Atriplex(cordulata CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex cordulata Atriplex(cordulata(var.(cordulata CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex cordulata var. cordulata Atriplex(cordulata(var.(erecticaulis CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex cordulata var. erecticaulis Atriplex(depressa CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex depressa Atriplex(minuscula CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex minuscula Atriplex(parishii CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex parishii Atriplex(persistens CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex persistens Atriplex(subtilis CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex subtilis Blennosperma(bakeri ASTERACEAE Blennosperma
  • Plants in Cardiology

    Plants in Cardiology

    Br Heart J 1991;65:57 57 PLANTS IN CARDIOLOGY 1879 and identified at Cairo University in 1932 Br Heart J: first published as 10.1136/hrt.65.1.57 on 1 January 1991. Downloaded from as a chromone. Khellin works by relaxing the smooth muscle of the ureter. It was, however, a chance observation in 1945 by G V Anrep, a pupil of both Pavlov and Starling, that led to the development from khellin of modern drugs for asthma and heart disease. Anrep was Professor of Pharmacology in Cairo and his technician who had severe angina got renal colic and treated himself with khella. When the man returned to work Anrep perceptively noticed that he no longer had angina and this stimulated him to investigate the effect of khellin on the heart. Using the heart-lung preparation Anrep measured the coronary blood flow in dogs and showed that khellin was an effective and selective coronary vasodilator. Then he did a clinical trial in patients with angina which gave favourable results. His seminal paper reporting these findings was published in the British Heart Journal (1946;8:171-7.) This stimulated research elsewhere; and in Belgium the work of R Charlier and J Broek- huysen, who prepared hundreds of compounds with emphasis on the benzofurane portion of khellin, led in 1961 to the synthesis of amiodarone. The name is derived from am, to indicate the presence of an amine function; iod, for the iodine moiety; and arone from ben- ziodarone, an earlier drug in the ketonic ben- zofurane group. F Bossert, working for the Bayer company, decided to use khellin as the starting point for his endeavour to find a coronary vasodilator http://heart.bmj.com/ that worked intravenously as well as orally.