DOCSLIB.ORG

LECTURE> Angela Howard at Waseda

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LECTURE> Angela Howard at Waseda H-Buddhism LECTURE> Angela Howard at Waseda Discussion published by Noboyoshi Yamabe on Tuesday, June 7, 2016 Dear Colleagues: On behalf of my colleague, Professor HIDA Romi, who is not on this list, I am posting the following announcement of a public lecture. The lecture will be given in English and translated into Japanese. No preregistration is required. Anybody interested will be welcome. Speaker: Angela Howard, Professor Emerita, Rutgers University Title: A Question of Identity: Who is the Cosmological Buddha? Date: Monday, July 4, 2016, 5pm-6:30pm. Venue: Waseda University, Toyama Campus, Bldg 31, Rm 208. https://www.waseda.jp/top/en/access/toyama-campus About the Speakier: Angela F. Howard was professor of Asian art in the Department of Art History, Rutgers University, from 1990-2015. She served as special consultant in the Department of Asian Art of the Metropolitan Museum, New York from 1999-2004 and participated in organizing the 2004 exhibition From Han to Tang. In addition to numerous articles, Dr. Howard authored The Imagery of the Cosmological Buddha, E. J. Brill 1986;Summit of Treasures, Buddhist Cave Art of Dazu, Sichuan, Weatherhill Publishers 2001; Chinese Sculpture, in collaboration with Wu Hung, Yang Hong, Li Song, Yale University Press 2006; Archaeological and Visual Sources of Meditation in the ancient Monasteries of Kuča, in collaboration with Giuseppe Vignato, E. J. Brill 2014. Her research has been supported by the NEH National Endowment for the Humanities 1985, 1993; the Henry Luce Foundation 2002; the ACLS American Council of Learned Societies 2008. Abstract: ORIGIN OF THE COSMOLOGICAL BUDDHA In 1986 I publishedThe Imagery of the Cosmological Buddha, discussing a very special Buddha image, which I named ‘Cosmological Buddha’ on account of carrying on its body a vision of the Buddhist world inclusive of the destinies or gatis in which sentient beings are reborn according to the karmic process. I suggested that the Cosmological Buddha is Shakyamuni not Vairocana. I also considered the rise of a possible Vairocana cult in Khotan, the country of origin of the 4th century Avatamsaka sutra (Chinese Huayan jing), a Mahayana text. More recently, in Archaeological and Visual Sources of Meditation in the ancient Monasteries ofKuča, a collaboration with Giuseppe Vignato (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2014), I reconsidered this topic and concluded that the Avatamsaka sutra and its related images are not the source of the Cosmological Buddha images executed in Kucha. The study of Kucha rock-cut monastery–their layout and monastic practices–pointed to Kucha as the place of origin of the Cosmological Buddha in the 5th-century. This iconography stemmed from the pre-Mahayana,Dirghagama text, embraced by the Sarvastivadin School, which prevailed in Kucha. Their teachings and support for meditation originated the Citation: Noboyoshi Yamabe. LECTURE> Angela Howard at Waseda. H-Buddhism. 06-07-2016. https://networks.h-net.org/node/6060/discussions/128721/lecture-angela-howard-waseda Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-Buddhism Cosmological as Buddha Shakyamuni in his role of ‘Lord of the Universe’, to use Professor Akira Miyaji terminology, the Buddha who carries the world in his body. CHINESE APPROPRIATION AND ADAPTATION In 6th-century China, as a result of the transmission of this iconography, paintings and sculpture of the Cosmological Buddha formed a conspicuous group of sculpture. All these images have been identified by Chinese and a few Western scholars as Vairocana. This identification as Vairocana is not a clear-cut issue, as I discuss in this presentation. To start with, Cosmological Buddha images identified as Vairocana retain, surprisingly, the pre- Mahayana cosmology on their bodies. How can we justify this appropriation and adaptation of an original Shakyamuni imagery to that of Vairocana? The answer may lie in the rise of a Vairocana cult in China in the 5th century based on the introduction of its corresponding sutra,Huayan jing, translated by Budhabhadra in 421, the 60 rolls recension. The growing cult of Vairocana Buddha determined the appropriation of the original Central Asian cosmic iconography, which lends itself better to representation than the iconography derived from the Huayan jing. DURING TANG THE COSMIC ICONOGRAPHY WAS SIMULTANEOUSLY APPLIED TO SHAKYAMUNI AND VAIROCANA During the Tang Dynasty, undoubtedly the cult of Vairocana Buddha and its related iconography came to full bloom, based on the availability of the complete translation by Sikshananda of the Avatamsaka text, the 80 rolls recension. However, the earlier cosmic iconography rooted in the Dirghagama was still adopted in Dunhuang painted images of Vairocana. In these paintings, the Cosmological Buddha is Shakyamuni, although the allusions to the cosmos painted on his body are the same as those used for a Cosmological Vairocana. Thus, during Tang, the question of identity became puzzlingly interwoven as both Buddha manifestations claimed the same cosmic identity. Nobuyoshi Yamabe Waseda University Citation: Noboyoshi Yamabe. LECTURE> Angela Howard at Waseda. H-Buddhism. 06-07-2016. https://networks.h-net.org/node/6060/discussions/128721/lecture-angela-howard-waseda Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Contents Transcriptions Romanization Zen 1 Chinese Chán Sanskrit Name 1.1 Periodisation Sanskrit Dhyāna 1.2 Origins and Taoist Influences (C
    7/11/2014 Zen - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Zen From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Zen is a school of Mahayana Buddhism[note 1] that Zen developed in China during the 6th century as Chán. From China, Zen spread south to Vietnam, northeast to Korea and Chinese name east to Japan.[2] Simplified Chinese 禅 Traditional Chinese 禪 The word Zen is derived from the Japanese pronunciation of the Middle Chinese word 禪 (dʑjen) (pinyin: Chán), which in Transcriptions turn is derived from the Sanskrit word dhyāna,[3] which can Mandarin be approximately translated as "absorption" or "meditative Hanyu Pinyin Chán state".[4] Cantonese Zen emphasizes insight into Buddha-nature and the personal Jyutping Sim4 expression of this insight in daily life, especially for the benefit Middle Chinese [5][6] of others. As such, it de-emphasizes mere knowledge of Middle Chinese dʑjen sutras and doctrine[7][8] and favors direct understanding Vietnamese name through zazen and interaction with an accomplished Vietnamese Thiền teacher.[9] Korean name The teachings of Zen include various sources of Mahāyāna Hangul 선 thought, especially Yogācāra, the Tathāgatagarbha Sutras and Huayan, with their emphasis on Buddha-nature, totality, Hanja 禪 and the Bodhisattva-ideal.[10][11] The Prajñāpāramitā Transcriptions literature[12] and, to a lesser extent, Madhyamaka have also Revised Romanization Seon been influential. Japanese name Kanji 禅 Contents Transcriptions Romanization Zen 1 Chinese Chán Sanskrit name 1.1 Periodisation Sanskrit dhyāna 1.2 Origins and Taoist influences (c. 200- 500) 1.3 Legendary or Proto-Chán - Six Patriarchs (c. 500-600) 1.4 Early Chán - Tang Dynasty (c.
    [Show full text]
  • A Huayan Paradigm for the Classification of Mahāyāna Teachings: the Origin and Meaning of Faxiangzong and Faxingzong∗
    IMRE HAMAR A HUAYAN PARADIGM FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF MAHĀYĀNA TEACHINGS: THE ORIGIN AND MEANING ∗ OF FAXIANGZONG AND FAXINGZONG Introduction Dan Lusthaus finds the origin of the paradigm xing 性 versus xiang 相 in the Cheng weishi lun 成唯識論 and concludes: Ironically, this very distinction became one of the major rhetorical weapons used by Fa- tsang against Hsüan-tsang’s school, calling them ‘[the mere] fa-hsiang’ (Dharma-Charac- teristics) school against his own Sinitic ‘fa-hsing’ (Dharma-Nature) school. This distinction became so important that every Buddhist school originating in East Asia, including all forms of Sinitic Mahāyāna, viz. T’ien-t’ai, Hua-yen, Ch’an, and Pure Land, came to be considered Dharma-nature schools.1 Whalen Lai also attributes the establishment of this paradigm to Fazang, refer- ring to Zhili 知禮: “The name ‘Fa-hsiang’ was, however, attributed to it by its crit- ics; it is a derogative term alleging that the school did not know thoroughly the deeper Fa-hsing (Dharma-essence). The contrast was intended to bring out the ‘Hī- nayānist phenomenalism’ [sic] inherent in the Wei-shih school and to highlight the ‘Mahāyāna essentialism’ of its critic. As recalled by Sung T’ien-t’ai master Ssu- ming Chih-li (959–1028), the distinction arose at the time of Fa-tsang’s (643–712) attack on the Wei-shih school: At the time [of Hua-yen (Avatamsaka) patriarch, Fa-tsang,] there was widely held the theory of chen-ju sui-yüan (Suchness or tathatā accompanying the conditions [the pratyaya that brought samsāra into being]) and the theory of a (passive) Suchness that would not create (‘let rise’) the various existents (dharmas).
    [Show full text]
  • The Pure Land Thought of Chan Master Jixing Chewu (1741-1810)
    Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies Volume 23 • Number 1 • 2000 n JIKIDO TAKASAKI In memoriam Prof. Hajime Nakamura 1 DANIEL BOUCHER On Hu and Fan Again: the Transmission of "Barbarian" Manuscripts to China 7 ANN HEIRMAN What Happened to the Nun Maitreyl? 29 CHARLES B. JONES Mentally Constructing What Already Exists: The Pure Land Thought of Chan Master Jixing Chewu (1741-1810) 43 JAN NATTIER The Realm of Aksobhya: A Missing Piece in the History of Pure Land Buddhism 71 REIKO OHNUMA The Story of RupavatI: A Female Past Birth of the Buddha 103 BHIKKHU PASADIKA A Hermeneutical Problem in SN 42, 12 (SN IV, 333) and AN X, 91 (AN V, 178) 147 OSKAR VON HINUBER Report on the Xllth Conference of the IABS 155 Accounts of the Xllth IABS Conference 161 CHARLES B, JONES Mentally Constructing What Already Exists: The Pure Land Thought of Chan Master Jixing Chewu fflmWfig (1741-1810) L INTRODUCTION One aspect of Chinese Pure Land history that has begun receiving atten­ tion during the past twenty years is the existence of a widely-recognized series of "patriarchs" (zu whose number stands at thirteen (although one list I have seen contains fourteen names).1 These are figures whom Pure Land devotees acknowledge as shapers, defenders, and revivers of the tradition. Twelfth in this series is the mid-Qing dynasty figure of Jixing Chewu |£|IfS(ti§, a Chan monk in the Linji line who, in mid-life, abandoned the practice of Chan and devoted himself exclusively to the Pure Land path. After this change of direction, he put his energy into building up his home temple, the Zifu Temple |f^§# on Hongluo Mountain HiiULl in Hebei, into a center for Pure Land practice, and his talks and essays focused on issues related to Pure Land practice, philoso­ phy, and apologetics.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Sichuan Buddhist Steles and the Beginnings of Pure Land Imagery in China Author(S): Dorothy C
    Four Sichuan Buddhist Steles and the Beginnings of Pure Land Imagery in China Author(s): Dorothy C. Wong Source: Archives of Asian Art, Vol. 51 (1998/1999), pp. 56-79 Published by: University of Hawai'i Press for the Asia Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20111283 . Accessed: 22/11/2013 13:42 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of Hawai'i Press and Asia Society are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Archives of Asian Art. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.143.172.192 on Fri, 22 Nov 2013 13:42:46 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Four Sichuan Buddhist Steles and the Beginnings of Pure Land Imagery in China Dorothy C.Wong University of Virginia 1 he Northern and Southern Dynasties (386?589) iswell thriving economic and cultural center since Han times, a recognized as period of significant developments in but compared with Nanjing and Luoyang, capital cities Chinese art history. Idioms and artistic conventions estab where ritual art in the service of a state ideology remained lished in Han-dynasty (202 BCE?220 CE) art continued, an imperative, Sichuan always allowed artists a much while the acceptance of Buddhism and Buddhist art forms greater degree of freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • From Esoteric to Pure Land and Huayan Buddhism: Uṣṇīṣavijayā Dhāraṇī Mandala in Liao Buddhism
    美術史學硏究 第307號 2020. 9 pp. 153-184 http://dx.doi.org/10.31065/kjah.307.202009.005 From Esoteric to Pure Land and Huayan Buddhism: Uṣṇīṣavijayā Dhāraṇī Mandala in Liao Buddhism Youn-mi Kim Ⅰ. Introduction Ⅱ. Text and Image: Early Liao Mandala and Tang Scriptures Ⅲ. Three-dimensional Mandala Ⅳ. Textual Mandala: Modification and Expansion Ⅴ. Conclusion Ⅰ. Introduction The Uṣṇīṣavijayā dhāraṇī (Foding zunsheng tuoluoni 佛頂尊勝陀羅尼), known for its efficacy in removing bad karma and prolonging one’s lifespan, was one of the key Buddhist incantations in premodern China.1 Once the incantation became widespread in the Tang dynasty (618-907), it began 1 The textual source of the uṣṇīṣavijayā dhāraṇī is the Sutra of the Uṣṇīṣavijayā dhāraṇī (Foding zunsheng tuoluoni jing 佛頂尊勝陀羅尼經). The sutra was so popular that it was translated five times in China, once each by Buddhapālita (T. 19, no. 967), Du Xingyi (T. 19, no. 968), and Yijing (T. 19, no. 971), and twice by Divākara (T. 19, no. 969, and T. 19, no. 970). They have similar but slightly different contents. Among these, the translation by Buddhapālita was most widely used. For the political characteristics of the preface of Buddhapālita’s translation, see Antonino Forte, “The Preface to the So-called Buddhapālita Chinese Version of the Buddhosṇīṇa Vijaya Dhāraṇī Sūtra” unpublished paper, quoted in Paul F. Copp, “Voice, Dust, 153 to engender new types of material culture. Perhaps the best-known monument linked to this incantation was the jingchuang 經幢, or dhāraṇī pillar, that was erected for engravings of its text during the Tang.2 Such pillars proliferated throughout the Liao dynasty (907-1125).3 During the Liao period, however, another type of ritual object formed a main branch of the material culture pertaining to the Uṣṇīṣavijayā dhāraṇī—the mandala that was used for activating the power of this important incantation.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION The third patriarch of the Huayan tradition, Fazang 法藏 (643–712), is said to have built a Mirror Hall for Empress Wu 武 (r. 684–705) as a pedagogical device to illustrate the cardinal tenets of Huayan philosophy, the mutual interdependence and mutual interpenetration. According to later descriptions eight mirrors were placed in the four cardinal directions and four secondary directions, and one on the top, and one on the bottom. In the middle of the ten mirrors facing to one another, a Buddha statue was installed, along with a lamp or a candle to illuminate it. This setting pro- duced an infinite number of Buddha reflections in the mirrors. When I visited the Huayan monastery on Zhongnanshan in the outskirt of Xi’an a few years ago, I was disappointed to see that the temple which collapsed sometime during the Qing dy- nasty (1644–1911) consists of only a small building, and only the abbot with his dis- ciple live there. However, the recounstructed stūpas of Huayan patriarchs, Du Shun 杜順 (557–640) and Chengguan 澄觀 (738–839), can be seen in the yard of the monastery, preserving some glories of the past. The enthusiastic abbot showed me his reconstruction of Mirror Hall, a small building housing ten metal plates (as sub- stitutes for mirrors) and a Buddha image in the center. Lighting up the the candle, infinite Buddha images became reflected on the metal plates. In this volume Huayan Buddhism is in the center, and the articles arranged around this topic reflect it from different aspects providing various perspectives for the viewers to discern it, hence the title Reflecting Mirrors: Perspectives on Huayan Buddhism.
    [Show full text]
  • Biographies of Eminent Monks Volume II (DRAFT!!!! – DO NOT CITE!!) Imre Galambos
    Biographies of Eminent Monks Volume II (DRAFT!!!! – DO NOT CITE!!) Imre Galambos 1. Kumārajīva Kumārajīva (Jiumoluoshi 鳩摩羅什) means Age of a Child (tongshou 童壽). He was a native of India, and his family for generations served as chief ministers. Kumārajīva’s grandfather Daduo 達多 (Datta?) was an extraordinary person whose name was well known in their country. His father Jiumoyan 鳩摩炎 (Kumārayāna?) was intelligent and had exceptional integrity, and was about to inherit the post of chief minister but instead declined it and became a monk. He went east, crossing the Pamirs.1 Having heard of his abandoning worldly glory, the king of Kucha (Qiuci 龜茲) held him in high esteem. He came in person to the edge of the city to welcome him and to request him to become a state preceptor. The king had a younger sister who had just turned nineteen. Knowledgeable and bright, she could learn anything she read through once, and she could recite by heart anything just by hearing it. She had on her body a red birthmark which foretold that she would give birth to a sage son. Rulers of different countries had requested to marry her but she would not consent to this. But when she saw Kumārayāna, she wished to marry him, and thus [the king] compelled him to marry her. Soon she conceived Kumārajīva. When he was still in his mother’s womb, she sensed that her intuition and capacity for supernatural understanding was twice as strong as what it was normally. She had often heard of the virtue of the great monatery of Queli 雀梨, and that it had monks who had attained the Way.
    [Show full text]
  • The Huayan/Kegon/Hwaŏm Paintings in East Asia
    DOROTHY WONG THE HUAYAN/KEGON/HWAŎM PAINTINGS IN EAST ASIA Introduction Huayan (J. Kegon; K. Hwaŏm) Buddhism, whose teachings are based on the Huayan jing, the Avataṃsaka-sūtra or Flower Garland Sūtra, is one of the most important schools of East Asian Buddhism.1 The Huayan jing has provided inspiration for the creation of numerous artworks, ritual objects, and architectural complexes.2 We are familiar with the portrayals of Vairocana (Ch. Darirulai 大日如來, or Piluzhenafo 毘廬遮那佛), Mañjuśrī (Ch. Wenshu 文殊), and Samantabhadra (Ch. Puxian 普賢) – the “Three Holy Ones” of Huayan Buddhism. The Gaṇḍavyūha, or Rufajiepin 入法界品, the last chapter of the Tang translation of the Huayan jing, recounts the young boy Sudhana’s (Ch. Shancai tongzi 善財童子) pilgrimage to visit fifty-three spiritual friends (kalyāṇamitra) in search of enlightenment. This originally independ- ent text has inspired a variety of popular pictorial narratives and sculptural reliefs. In this study I discuss a group of Huayan paintings that hitherto has received relatively little attention. These are the so-called Huayan bian 華嚴變, or “trans- formation tableaux” (referring to bian 變, bianxiang 變相, or jingbian 經變), that are intended to embody, or make manifest, the entirety of the sūtra’s teaching in a pictorial format. I examine the Chinese examples from Dunhuang, of ninth- to eleventh-century dates, and the slightly later Japanese ones dating to the Kamakura 1 Early versions of this chapter were presented at the 2004 Association for Asian Studies annual meeting in San Diego, and at the Chinese Buddhism Conference held at Hsi Lai Temple, Los Angeles, in June 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • The Celebrated Buddhist Traveler and Translator Of
    Early Medieval China 8 (2002) 43 THE MAKING OF A SAINT: IMAGES OF XUANZANG IN EAST ASIA* Dorothy C. Wong University of Virginia The figure ofXuanzang 1: ~ (600-64), the celebrated Buddhist traveler and translator of early Tang China was revered in many different countries and inspired a variety of visual representations and commemorative objects. One of the most common in East Asian tradition is Xuanzang's portrayal as a pilgrin1 and itinerant, wearing sandals and carrying a backpack of siltra scrolls. We are also familiar with his portrayal in Journey to the West (Xiyou ji ~ iRl ~c) by Wu Cheng'en **)~, (ca. 1500-ca. 1582), a novel which fictionalizes Xuanzang's journey to India in the company of the mythical Monkey and other colorful characters. * In the research for this paper, I have relied on many pioneering studies by scholars of the distant past and of more recent times. A number of important sources are acknowledged in the notes but specifics ofthe arguments will not be repeated here except when pertinent. Early versions of this paper were pre­ sented at the College Art Association meeting of February 1999, Los Angeles, and at the International Conference on Dunhuang Studies held at the University of Hong Kong, July 2000. I would like to thank the following individuals for their comments and suggestions: Sylvan Barnet, Terese Tse Bartholomew, Karen Brock, William Burto, Susan Bush, Lokesh Chandra, Chen Jinhua, Robert Gimello, Paul Groner, Jao Tsung-I, Robert Linrothe, Victor H. Mair, Naonli Richard, John Shepherd, and Roderick Whitfield. At the Dunhuang Studies conference in Dunhuang, also summer 2000, I learned that an exhibition titled "The Silk Road and the World of Xuanzang" had opened at the Nara Prefectural Museum the previous summer, and was traveling to other sites in Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundations of Ethics and Practice in Chinese Pure Land Buddhism
    Journal of Buddhist Ethics ISSN 1076-9005 Foundations of Ethics and Practice in Chinese Pure Land Buddhism Charles B. Jones Department of the Religion and Religions Education The Catholic University of America Copyright Notice Digital copies of this work may be made and distributed provided no change is made and no alteration is made to the content. Reproduc- tion in any other format, with the exception of a single copy for private study, requires the written permission of the author. All enquiries to: [email protected] Charles B. Jones Foundations of Ethics and Practice in Chinese Pure Land Buddhism I. Defining the Problem This paper grew out of a longstanding dissatisfaction that I have had with Pure Land (jing- tu, 淨土) studies, and that is the dominance of a particular historical narrative which takes Kamakura-period Japanese Pure Land Buddhism as either the norm or the telos (or both) of all Pure Land Buddhism. Hindsight seems to make it easy to believe that, somehow or another, a kind of logic intrinsic to belief in Amitābha and his Pure Land led inexorably to the doctrines and practices of the Jōdoshū (淨土宗), the Jōdo Shinshū (淨土真宗), and the Jishū (時宗). The systems elaborated by Hōnen (法然), Shinran (親鸞), and Ippen (一遍), which negated the efficacy of human action and vested Amitābha’s “other-power” with exclusive salvific potency, became, as it were, the Omega Point of Pure Land Buddhism’s development, and all forms of Pure Land teaching prior to these figures are to be seen in their relationship to this Omega Point.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspiring to Enlightenment: Pure Land Buddhism in Silla Korea'
    H-Buddhism Jones on McBride, 'Aspiring to Enlightenment: Pure Land Buddhism in Silla Korea' Review published on Thursday, December 10, 2020 Richard D. McBride. Aspiring to Enlightenment: Pure Land Buddhism in Silla Korea. Pure Land Buddhist Studies. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2020. 247 pp. $68.00 (cloth),ISBN 978-0-8248-8260-0. Reviewed by Charles B. Jones (The Catholic University of America)Published on H-Buddhism (December, 2020) Commissioned by Sujung Kim (DePauw University) Printable Version: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=55678 I want to begin by saying this is a fine book that belongs in the collection of any scholar interested in East Asian Buddhism. The field has been dominated by studies of Buddhism in China and Japan, and despite the fact that Korea sits squarely between these two regions and often served as the connective tissue between them, studies in Korean Buddhism have been sadly lacking. Every competent study of this neglected topic should be received with gratitude. Still, I have some reservations about this book. As a specialist in the study of Pure Land Buddhism, I wanted to welcome it as a needed addition to that field as well. However, I found myself puzzled at several junctures, and I think the source of my confusion can be seen in two sentences, one from the beginning of the book and one from the end. On the first page of chapter 1, the author says: “The purposes of this book are to explore the development of Pure Land Buddhism in the early Korean state of Silla 新羅 (ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Huayan Buddhism Huáyán Chánjiào ​华严禅教
    ◀ Huawei Comprehensive index starts in volume 5, page 2667. Huayan Buddhism Huáyán Chánjiào ​华严禅教 The Huayan school of Chinese Buddhism is school of Buddhism, which developed with little influ- part of the Mahayana tradition that examines ence from India, and which emphasized both meditation the metaphysical condition of things. As such, and engagement with the world. Zhiyi (538– 597) is con- it seeks to explain phenomena as an interpen- sidered to be the founder of the Tiantai school. These vari- ous modes Fazang arranged into five classifications, or the etration of the universal with the particular, Five Teachings: the Hinayana, which sought to explain wherein the macrocosm is found contained phenomenal reality; the Mahayana, which examined the within the microcosm. nature of phenomena as well as the Middle Way (which, in turn, describes the universal principle that all reality shares—​­namely, emptiness); late Mahayana, which elu- he Huayan school of Buddhist thought is one of cidated the relationship of the particular to the univer- the most important interpretations of metaphys- sal; the Abrupt Teaching with its explication of silence; ics in Chinese and Asian thought. Its name de- and lastly the Huayan, or what Fazang called the “Perfect rives from a treatise written by one of the school’s early Teaching,” which defined emptiness as the interpenetra- founders, Fazang (643– 712), entitled A Treatise on the Di- tion of all existence. visions of the One Vehicle Doctrine of Huayan. The term huayan translates the Sanskrit term avatamsaka, meaning “flower garland,” and referring to a sutra (discourse) in Interpenetration which the Buddha relates, for the first time and immedi- ately after his enlightenment, the process through which The primary teaching of Huayan is its paradigm of inter- he attained his enlightened state.
    [Show full text]