DOCSLIB.ORG

Collective Impact As a Social Innovation in the UK

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Collective Impact As a Social Innovation in the UK From competition to collaboration, what will it take? Developing collective impact as a social innovation in the UK Master thesis for Master of Arts in Social Innovation Danube University Krems, Austria Ms Tara Anderson Primary Advisor: Msc, Remko Berkhout Secondary Advisor: Mag.a Denisa Vesely London, UK, August 2015 Acknowledgements I am indebted to many people for advice, input and feedback on this thesis. I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor, Remko Berkhout, for his encouragement, theoretical knowledge and practical insight. His ability to think outside existing frameworks, to challenge my arguments, and his reminders not to take myself too seriously, were greatly appreciated. This thesis would not have been possible without the collective impact practitioners who gave their time to share their learning. Their willingness to contribute to the research embodies the values and philosophy of collective impact work. Thank you to the team at the Finance Innovation Lab for welcoming me to their meetings and events and being so open in sharing their experiences. Particular thanks go to Jennifer Morgan for sharing her experience, and arranging interviews with other Finance Innovation Lab members. Thank you to Chris Hewett and Christine Berry for their time and insights. Thank you to Louisa Mitchell of West London Zone, for her honest ‘warts and all’ reflections. Thank you to Matthew Pike for sharing his previous research and future collective impact plans. I also owe thanks to my colleagues at London Early Years Foundation - Louise Cooper and Catherine Whitecourt - who gave their time to review earlier versions of the thesis. Their encouragement on Monday mornings after a weekend of reading and writing was gratefully received. Finally I acknowledge the support of my partner, Andrew Curtis. Without his encouragement, I would not have enrolled in the Masters in the first place. His reminder to come back to the research question when I had headed off on a tangent, his critical reflections, and not forgetting the regular cups of coffee, added great value to the finished product. 2 Abstract There is increasing recognition that cross-sector collaboration is crucial in addressing entrenched and systemic social challenges. In the UK, collaborative initiatives appear to have been eroded somewhat by the dominant neoliberal ideology that encourages individualism and competition and results in fragmented approaches to social change. Collective impact is emerging as a socially innovative practice around the world, offering an advanced form of structured collaboration with the potential to significantly increase impact in addressing systemic challenges. This thesis explores the conditions required to make collective impact work in the UK through an analysis of barriers and enablers. It will draw on a review of international collective impact literature and two London-based collective impact projects – The Finance Innovation Lab and West London Zone. It will be argued that the key to developing collective impact in the UK is a new generation of independent, third sector backbone organisations that are sufficiently funded, promoted and supported. Keywords: backbone organisations, collective impact, social innovation, collaboration, systems change 3 Reflections and learning This thesis began with two observations. Firstly, economic inequality in the UK is far beyond acceptable levels. Secondly, working with charities and social enterprises over the past ten years I have noticed a cognitive dissonance – while impact reports boasted positive results, the issues these organisations were tackling were not shifting on a wider level. Moving from Australia to the UK I was surprised to discover how fragmented the UK charity and social enterprise sector is, with a proliferation of small charities and social enterprises, many competing with each other but ultimately working towards the same goal. Despite their work to improve conditions for the most disadvantaged and vulnerable, and the hype of social innovation as the ‘next big thing’, entrenched social challenges such as economic inequality remain stubbornly in place. These observations led me to the practice of collective impact as a framework for combining resources for greater impact, and I formulated the research question: how can collective impact be used to reduce economic inequality in the UK? During the course of the research it became evident that the scope of my ambition was greater than the scope of the thesis. I am aware that it is difficult (if not impossible) to prove causality between collective impact and a reduction in economic inequality, and so the research question was refined to look more specifically at the conditions required for collective impact to be practiced as a social innovation in the UK, using a reduction in economic inequality as a case in point. I have a normative understanding of social innovation and believe that it should have the intent and effect of justice, empowerment and equality. I believe there is huge opportunity to address complex challenges and achieve systems change, such as a reduction in economic inequality, if resources are combined in more creative ways through collective impact. This thesis sets out to explore how that could be made possible in the UK context. 4 Contents Chapter One - Introduction ................................................................................ 7 Chapter Two - Methodology ............................................................................ 11 Theory and process ........................................................................................................................ 11 Literature review ............................................................................................................................... 11 Case study analysis ........................................................................................................................... 12 Interviews ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Observations ..................................................................................................................................... 14 Limitations to the study ................................................................................................................. 16 A note on economic inequality ....................................................................................................... 17 Definitions of social innovation abound ......................................................................................... 18 Categorising social innovation definitions ...................................................................................... 19 The argument for a normative definition of social innovation ........................................................ 20 The march of neoliberalism ............................................................................................................ 24 The UK’s ‘Big Society’: the privatisation and austerity agenda ........................................................ 25 Implications of neoliberalism for collaborative styles of working ................................................... 26 Why the approach is flawed: the proof is in economic inequality ................................................... 27 Income inequality ............................................................................................................................. 28 Wealth inequality .............................................................................................................................. 29 Poverty .............................................................................................................................................. 29 Chapter Five - collective impact as an alternative approach ............................. 31 The what and why of collaboration ................................................................................................ 31 Collective impact – an emerging approach ..................................................................................... 33 Collective impact as a social innovation ......................................................................................... 35 A brief look at the international collective impact landscape ......................................................... 36 Chapter Six – primary barriers and enablers of collective impact in the UK ...... 40 Primary barriers ............................................................................................................................. 44 Existing services with established theories of change ...................................................................... 44 Time required to build relationships ................................................................................................. 45 Ego and power dynamics .................................................................................................................. 46 Inflexible understanding of perceived roles ..................................................................................... 48 The political and cultural climate in the UK ...................................................................................... 49 Lack of long-term and flexible funding ............................................................................................. 51 Primary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Therapeutic Residential Care for Children and Young People
    Therapeutic Residential Care for Children and Young People by the same author A Child’s Journey to Recovery Assessment and Planning with Traumatized Children Patrick Tomlinson and Terry Philpot Foreword by Mary Walsh ISBN 978 1 84310 330 1 Delivering Recovery series Therapeutic Approaches in Work with Traumatised Children and Young People Theory and Practice Patrick Tomlinson Foreword by Paul van Heeswyk ISBN 978 1 84310 187 1 Community, Culture and Change series of related interest Reaching the Vulnerable Child Therapy with Traumatized Children Janie Rymaszewska and Terry Philpot Foreword by Mary Walsh ISBN 978 1 84310 329 5 Delivering Recovery series Living Alongside a Child’s Recovery Therapeutic Parenting with Traumatized Children Billy Pughe and Terry Philpot Foreword by Mary Walsh ISBN 978 1 84310 328 8 Delivering Recovery series The Child’s Own Story Life Story Work with Traumatized Children Richard Rose and Terry Philpot Foreword by Mary Walsh ISBN 978 1 84310 287 8 Delivering Recovery series Just Care Restorative Justice Approaches to Working with Children in Public Care Belinda Hopkins Foreword by Jonathan Stanley ISBN 978 1 84310 981 5 Children and Adolescents in Trauma Creative Therapeutic Approaches Edited by Chris Nicholson, Michael Irwin and Kedar N. Dwivedi Foreword by Peter Wilson ISBN 978 1 84310 437 7 Community, Culture and Change series A Practical Guide to Caring for Children and Teenagers with Attachment Difficulties Chris Taylor ISBN 978 1 84905 081 4 Therapeutic Residential Care for Children and Young People An Attachment and Trauma-Informed Model for Practice Susan Barton, Rudy Gonzalez and Patrick Tomlinson Foreword by Brian Burdekin Jessica Kingsley Publishers London and Philadelphia Extracts from Hannon, Wood and Bazalgette 2010 are reproduced by permission of Louise Bazalgette, Demos.
    [Show full text]
  • TACKLING CHILD ABUSE in SCOTLAND a Guide for Funders
    TACKLING CHILD ABUSE IN SCOTLAND A guide for funders George Hoare, Katie Boswell and Angela Kail May 2016 TACKLING CHILD ABUSE IN SCOTLAND A guide for funders George Hoare, Katie Boswell and Angela Kail May 2016 CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 3 Setting the scene ................................................................................................................................................ 3 The purpose of this report ................................................................................................................................... 3 The landscape of child abuse in Scotland ............................................................................. 4 Definitions, prevalence and costs ........................................................................................................................ 4 The policy context of child protection .................................................................................................................. 6 Trends affecting child abuse in Scotland ............................................................................................................. 7 Priority needs ........................................................................................................................ 9 Risk factors for child abuse ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Inspiration from ACE Interrupters in Great Britain
    Inspiration from ACE Interrupters in Great Britain Sharing the stories of individuals who have made a remarkable difference to those affected by Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) 1 Inspiration from ACE Interrupters in Great Britain Sharing the stories of individuals who have made a remarkable difference to those affected by Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) Editors: Katie Hardcastle, Mark A. Bellis, Kat Ford, Katy Hetherington, Joanne Hopkins and Emma Clark. Contributors: Interviews were undertaken and written by Emma Clark. Acknowledgments Sincere thanks are extended to all the interviewees who kindly gave up their time to share their stories. The editors would also like to thank Berit Kieselbach and Anne Mullin for providing peer review, and Karen Hughes and Rob Kelly for their support in producing the document. The ACE interrupters we meet in this book are from across England, Wales and Scotland and were interviewed between May and November 2019. Where appropriate, some names have been changed to protect anonymity. If you are affected by any of the issues raised in this book and would like further information or support, please contact your GP in the first instance. Alternatively, you may want to seek support from the following organisations: • NSPCC is a major UK charity specialising in child protection and the prevention of cruelty to children. The NSPCC’s purpose is to end cruelty to children. Help for adults concerned about a child: Call 0808 800 5000 or text 88858. If you are an adult that experienced abuse as a child, the NSPCC can also provide help and advice. • Victim Support is a national charity giving free and confidential help to anyone affected by crime.
    [Show full text]
  • The PDF of Bringing Everything I Am Into One Place
    Bringing Everything I Am Into One Place An Inquiry into how we can all better support young people facing severe and multiple disadvantage The LankellyChase Foundation is a registered company limited by guarantee number 5309739 and a registered charity number 1107583. The Warren House Group at Dartington is a registered company limited by guarantee number 04610839 and a registered charity number 1099202. For further information, please contact Rebeca Sandu, [email protected] Bringing Everything I Am Into One Place Introduction 1. In and Out of Difficulty 2. Between the Cracks 3. Outcomes of the Outcomes of the Outcomes 4. What is it About Relationships? 5. Relational Social Policy Michael Little 6. Relate Without Pity Rebeca Sandu Beth Truesdale Methodology Dartington Social Research Unit Version 1.0 References June 2015 Acknowledgements and Participants Part of the relate without pity series Typeset by James Jessiman Introduction 2 Conversations Foundations for Families Julian Corner and Cathy Stancer, Birth Companions LankellyChase Foundation Edinburgh Cyrenians Carol Hamlett and Sue Shelley, Place2Be from Transforming Choice and Local Solutions 3H Advisor Marcella Phelan and Dionne Usherwood, commissioners from the London Boroughs Local Solutions’ Intense Mentoring of Ealing and Camden Transforming Choice Alan Latham and Asha Ali, Relational Schools from Local Solutions and 3H Advisor The Participle Life Programme Mike Ashton and Joe Keatley, from Transforming Choices The Integrate Model Julian Corner and Suzi Leather, Circles
    [Show full text]
  • Innovations in Health Service Delivery. the Corporatization of Public
    Preker • Harding Human Development Network Health, Nutrition, and Population Series Innovations in Health Service Delivery Public Disclosure Authorized Hospital care is the largest expenditure category in the health systems of both industrialized and developing countries. Although hospitals play a critical role in ensuring delivery of health Innovations in services, less is known about how to improve the efficiency and quality of care provided. Much can be learned in this respect from the experiences of hospital reforms initiated during the Health Service 1990s. Innovations in Health Service Delivery: The Corporatization of Public Hospitals is an attempt Public Disclosure Authorized to examine the design, implementation, and impact of reforms that introduced market forces in the public hospital sector. Delivery This book provides the valuable knowledge and experience needed to avoid many of the obstacles that arise in the process of “corporatizing” public hospitals. —Professor Per-Gunnar Svensson, General Director, International Hospital Federation The Corporatization of A splendid book that is essential reading for health care professionals, policymakers, and health Public Hospitals service managers. All will benefit from the expert analysis and well-documented case studies presented here. —Dr. E.K. Yeoh, President, International Hospital Federation In a world where we often seem to learn and relearn the same lessons over and over again, this Alexander S. Preker book provides a valuable source of advice to policymakers and practitioners
    [Show full text]
  • 2011/12 Annual Report and Accounts
    THE DULVERTON TRUST Annual Report and Accounts 2011/2012 5 St James’s Place, London SW1A 1NP Charity Registered in England and Wales No: 206426 ______________________Trustees_______________________ Mr Christopher Wills - Chairman Sir John Kemp-Welch - Vice Chairman Finance Mr Tara Douglas-Home The Lord Dulverton Mr Richard Fitzalan Howard The Earl of Gowrie The Lord Hemphill Dame Mary Richardson Sir Malcolm Rifkind Dr Catherine Wills Members of the Trust Finance Committee Sir John Kemp-Welch - Vice Chairman Finance The Lord Dulverton Mr Richard Fitzalan Howard The Lord Hemphill Dr Catherine Wills Mr Christopher Wills _______________________________ Staff _______________________________ Director Andrew Stafford Finance Director Christopher Lightfoot Grants Director Sally Stockwell Administrator & Grants Assistant Anna de Pulford ________________ Professional Advisers _______________ Investment Managers Artemis Investment Management Ltd Cassini House, 57 St James’s Street London, SW1A 1LD BlackRock Global Investors Ltd Murray House, 1 Royal Mint Court London EC3N 4HH Cazenove Capital Management Ltd 12 Moorgate, London EC2R 6DA CG Asset Management 25 Moorgate, London EC2R 6AY BNY Mellon (Newton) Asset Management Mellon Financial Centre, 160 Queen Victoria Street London EC4V 4LA Pimco Europe Ltd Nations House 103 Wigmore Street, London W10 1QS RWC Partners Ltd 60 Petty France, London SW1H 9EU Veritas Asset Management (UK) Ltd 6th Floor, Elizabeth House 39 York Street, London SE1 7NQ Bankers National Westminster Bank plc 208 Piccadilly, London W1A 2DG Solicitors Farrer and Co 66 Lincoln’s Inn, London WC2A 3LH Auditors Nexia Smith & Williamson Audit Ltd 25 Moorgate, London EC2R 6AY 3 THE DULVERTON TRUST Structure, Governance and Management The Dulverton Trust was founded by the 1st Lord Dulverton in 1949 as a general grant-making charity.
    [Show full text]
  • Eg Phd, Mphil, Dclinpsychol
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. ‘Rules, Rules, Rules and We’re Not Allowed to Skip’ Lynn J. McNair PhD Research The University of Edinburgh 2016 Exploratory study: Listening to children’s voices about the transition to Primary One. This signed statement confirms that this thesis, Rules, Rules, Rules and We’re Not Allowed to Skip, is my own work and that contributions from other sources are duly acknowledged. Signed Lynn McNair September 2016 PhD University of Edinburgh 2016 Contents Acknowledgments…………………………………………………………………... 1 Abstract………………………………………………………………………….….. 2 Glossary of terms………………………………………………………………....... 4 Chapter One: Introduction…………...……………………………………………. 7 1.1 The scope of this study………………………………………….……………. 7 1.2 The research questions………….……………………………..……………..10 1.3 Background and context……………………………………...………………11 1.4 A Childhood Studies perspective…………………………………………….17 1.5 Navigating this thesis……………………………………..…………….…. 18 Chapter Two: Introduction to the literature review……….……………………20 2.1 Transition is a natural stage related to biological age (child development) ……......…..………………………………………………… 21 2.1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Meeting Bbb Accountability Standards Affect Charitable
    DOES MEETING BBB ACCOUNTABILITY STANDARDS AFFECT CHARITABLE GIVING? A FOLLOW-UP STUDY OF NEW YORK METROPOLITAN AREA CHARITIES, REPLICATED BY A NATIONAL SAMPLE Greg Chen, Ph.D. Baruch College, City University of New York August 2013 Introduction Donations are an essential source of revenue for most charities. Unrestricted contributions are especially important for support of general operations and capacity-building. The national aggregate amount of contributions revenue is significant. According to Giving USA, total charitable giving in the U.S. reached $316.23 billion in 2012, an increase of 3.5 percent from 2011 (Giving USA, 2013). However, the nonprofit sector has grown even more rapidly, outpacing the growth of contributions, leading to increased competition among charities and making giving decisions challenging for donors (Cnaan, et al. 2011; Hasenwinkel, 2006; Hager, 2003). Ideally, the performance of nonprofits in terms of effectiveness, efficiency and accountability should be evaluated with the results compared and reported to the public, so that donors can decide on which nonprofit to support, based not only on their values and taste, but also on the charity’s performance and accountability. However, performance measurement of nonprofits is complicated. Practitioners and academic communities have not yet developed common methods and criteria for charity impact evaluation that can be applied across subsectors, and in some cases, even within service areas (Richie et al., 2004). Many charities also lack in-house expertise to conduct meaningful self-evaluations of outcomes or operations performance. In this context, donors may base their giving decisions on accountability measures such as nonprofit governance and oversight practices, accuracy of fundraising solicitations, financial elements such as budgets and program expense ratios, and transparency in terms of easy access to nonprofit information (Polonsky and Grau, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Better Systems, Better Chances: a Review of Research and Practice for Prevention and Early Intervention
    Better Systems, Better Chances: A Review of Research and Practice for Prevention and Early Intervention Dr Stacey Fox, Angela Southwell, Neil Stafford, Dr Rebecca Goodhue, Dr Dianne Jackson, Dr Charlene Smith © 2015 The Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth (ARACY) owns copyright of all material in this report. You may reproduce this material in unaltered form only (acknowledging the source) for your personal, noncommercial use or use within your organisation. Commercial use of material in this report is prohibited. Except as permitted above you must not copy, adapt, publish, distribute or commercialise any material contained in this publication without ARACY’s permission. ISBN: 978-1-921352-95-9 Disclaimer This report is based on a rapid synthesis of prevention and early intervention research conducted over a 6 week period in April and May 2014. It provides an overview and analysis of key themes and messages from peer-reviewed and grey literature. Readers are advised to consider the most current evidence when selecting and implementing interventions. Suggested citation Fox, S., Southwell, A., Stafford, N., Goodhue, R., Jackson, D. and Smith, C. (2015). Better Systems, Better Chances: A Review of Research and Practice for Prevention and Early Intervention. Canberra: Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth (ARACY). Contact us If you have any queries about this report, please contact ARACY: Mail: PO Box 5070, Braddon, ACT 2612 Email: [email protected] Website: aracy.org.au Phone: +61 2 6248 2400 @ARACYAustralia ABN 68 100 902 921 Acknowledgements ARACY acknowledges the New South Wales Department of Premier and Cabinet, who originally commissioned the earlier version of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Leading by Example
    January 2019 Review: Technology: Investment: Interview: 2018 in the news Technology in 2019 Tackling ESG Deborah Alsina Reputational scandals A look at some of the key Embracing ESG is crucial The chief of newly merged dominated the news this year, trends likely to transform for any charity, but what Bowel Cancer UK on her but regulatory intervention the charity technology space are defined as good and award-winning journey has set a new precedent. over the coming year. bad practices? towards greater collaboration. Leadership / Fundraising / Technology / Governance / Bowel Cancer UK interview Cancer / ESG / Bowel / Governance Technology / / Fundraising Leadership Leading by example Charity leadership is set to be even more challenging in 2019, but the matriarch elephant showcases some simple methods for success Plus: January 2019 www.charitytimes.com Sector and investment columns REVEALED News The top 25 charity CEOs on social media See page 50 for charity suppliers’ directory cover.indd 1 06/12/2018 15:07:43 PROVIDING INSURANCE With a Personal Touch An experienced and dedicated team who take the time to understand your specifi c requirements, then ensure the suffi cient cover is always arranged GET YOUR FREE QUOTATION TODAY PACKAGE POLICIES AVAILABLE FROM £120pa INCLUDING COVER FOR: 01992 566 985 ✔ Church buildings [email protected] ✔ Contents ✔ Public & employers liability WHY CHOOSE US? ✔ 0% monthly instalments ✔ Discount for good risk management ✔ Trustees indemnity covered as standard We can also quote for your Minibus! 67923 Mercury_Personal Touch Ad_271x204.indd 1 30/11/2018 16:11 Editorial Comment In this sector, reflection is essential hat was the best thing to happen to you this year? And what Editor Lauren Weymouth was the worst?” a charity chief executive asked me at a recent [email protected] networking event.
    [Show full text]
  • London Community Response Fund Grants Awarded Wave 1 & 2 CBT
    London Community Response Fund Grants awarded Wave 1 & 2 CBT ref Organisation Grant Amount Wave 16937 Consortium LGBT £15,000.00 Strategic Grant 16938 Inclusion London £15,000.00 Strategic Grant 16939 The Ubele Initiative £30,000.00 Strategic Grant 16940 Women's Resource Centre £15,000.00 Strategic Grant 16308 13 Rivers Trust £5,000.00 Wave 1 16448 ACE £5,000.00 Wave 1 16307 Acheinu Cancer Support £4,500.00 Wave 1 16659 Acheinu Limited T/A The Boys Clubhouse £1,500.00 Wave 1 16396 ACT Training Services £5,000.00 Wave 1 16580 Active Within CIC £4,500.00 Wave 1 16394 Advice Support Knowledge Information £2,563.00 Wave 1 16300 Afghanistan and Central Asian Association £4,940.00 Wave 1 16929 Africa Smile £4,980.00 Wave 1 African Women Empowerment And Information 16662 Centre £4,848.00 Wave 1 16303 Age UK Croydon £5,000.00 Wave 1 16668 Age UK East London £5,000.00 Wave 1 16321 Age UK Hillingdon, Harrow and Brent £5,000.00 Wave 1 16407 Age UK Sutton £5,000.00 Wave 1 16344 Age UK Westminster £5,000.00 Wave 1 16310 Alridha Foundation £4,989.00 Wave 1 16333 Alternatives Trust East London £5,000.00 Wave 1 16675 Amity Educational Foundation £4,400.00 Wave 1 Ananda Marga Universal Relief Team (AMURT) 16403 UK £4,982.00 Wave 1 16304 Ardleigh House Community Association £3,550.00 Wave 1 16680 Balance (Support) CIC £2,400.00 Wave 1 16449 Barking Churches Unite £4,000.00 Wave 1 16339 Barnet Carers Centre £5,000.00 Wave 1 16681 Barnet Environment Support Team CIC £5,000.00 Wave 1 16430 Barnfield Education Project (BEP Education) £4,694.00 Wave 1 16450
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Public Trust in Charities in the UK: an Empirical Study Based on Scale Development
    THE UNIVERSITY OF HULL Measuring Public Trust in Charities in the UK: An Empirical Study based on Scale Development Thesis submitted for the Degree of Ph.D in the University of Hull by Yongjiao Yang MPhil (Beijing Normal University, China) BA (Sichuan University, China) August, 2015 Abstract This study describes the development and initial utilizations of a scale measuring public trust in charities in the UK. It improves on past empirical studies of public trust in charities by regarding the concept as a multidimensional construct. The scale is developed first from a conceptual model consisting of five dimensions. Using data from 490 respondents, item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and internal consistency analysis are undertaken, of which results yield a three-factor principal components model of public trust in charities. Confirmatory factor analysis, construct validity analysis, and criterion-related validity analysis, based on another sample of 253 respondents, confirm the validity of the model with a slight modification. The initial five-factor model of trust in charities derived from literature, which include perceived competence, perceived benevolence, perceived integrity, value similarity, and willingness to be vulnerable, is rejected in favor of a three-factor principal components model. Of the three separate domains of public trust in charities, “perceived integrity” reflects the importance of morality in charity work; “perceived competence” reflects the necessity of charities’ capability to uphold and further public interests; and “value similarity” emphasizes the alignment of values between charities and individuals. Scale utilization demonstrates that this multidimensional tool will allow the U.K. charitable sector to better understand public trust and perceptions, to discern the manifestations of public trust, as well as to be responsive to trends in trust and perceptions.
    [Show full text]