Restructuring the Australian Economy to Emit Less Carbon: Detailed Analysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Restructuring the Australian Economy to Emit Less Carbon: Detailed Analysis April 2010 Restructuring the Australian Economy to Emit Less Carbon: Detailed Analysis John Daley and Tristan Edis Restructuring the Australian economy to emit less carbon – detailed analysis Founding members Senior Institutional Grattan Institute Report No. 2010-2 April 2010 Affiliates This report of detailed analysis accompanies a publication: National Australia Bank Restructuring the Australian economy to emit less carbon: main report . The main report can be downloaded from the Grattan Institute website This report was written by John Daley, CEO, and Tristan Edis, Research Fellow. Katherine Molyneux, Helen Morrow, Marcus Walsh and Julian Reichl provided extensive research assistance and made substantial contributions to the report. We would like to thank the members of Grattan Institute’s Energy Reference Group for their helpful comments, as well as numerous industry participants and officials for their input. The opinions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Grattan Institute’s founding members, Institutional Affiliates affiliates, individual board members or reference group members. Any remaining errors or omissions are the responsibility of the Arup authors. Urbis Grattan Institute is an independent think-tank focused on Australian public policy. Our work is thoughtful, evidence-based, and non-aligned. We aim to improve policy outcomes by engaging with both decision-makers and the community. For further information on Grattan Institute’s Energy program please go to: http://www.grattan.edu.au/programs/energy.php To join our mailing list please go to: http://www.grattan.edu.au/signup.html GRATTAN Institute 2010 2 Restructuring the Australian economy to emit less carbon – detailed analysis Table of Contents 1. Scope and methodology......................................................4 2. Principles of government support for affected industries.....9 3. Alumina Refining ...............................................................14 4. Liquefied Natural Gas........................................................19 5. Coal Mining........................................................................32 6. Raw steel production .........................................................44 7. Cement clinker...................................................................54 8. Aluminium Smelting...........................................................64 9. Oil Refining........................................................................76 10. Households........................................................................86 11. Glossary ............................................................................90 12. References ........................................................................92 GRATTAN Institute 2010 3 Restructuring the Australian economy to emit less carbon – detailed analysis 1. Scope and methodology 1.1 Scope legal forms may converge, particularly if tax rates are adjusted in light of actual emissions, or cap and trade schemes include floor This report focuses on the impact of carbon pricing on Australian and ceiling prices. 2 However, the optimal legal regime for carbon industry and households, understanding how carbon pricing will pricing is beyond the scope of this report. The primary impact on affect their costs and competitiveness. It does this through industry will probably be the level of the carbon price, rather than adopting a carbon price reflective of what is likely to occur over whether that level is set by a tax, or by a cap and trade scheme. the next 10 years according to Australian Treasury modelling - 1 $35 per tonne of CO 2. The precise form of carbon trading scheme may have a more subtle effect on the economy, by creating additional uncertainty The report does not investigate: about future profits. There is more certainty if the carbon price is fixed (or at least bounded by a cap and floor), and if there is • The merits of pricing carbon through a tax rather than a cap greater legislative commitment not to change the scheme for an and trade scheme extended time period. Normally uncertainty will be reflected by a higher cost of capital. Uncertainty may also result in high cost but • Dynamic interactions when carbon pricing causes an industry low emissions producers not investing until it is clear that carbon to reduce production, potentially reducing carbon pricing prices will be above a certain level, while low cost but high emission producers do not invest until it is clear that carbon prices • The impacts of carbon pricing on the cost of capital will be below a threshold. This is a particular issue for electricity generation. 3 However, modelling the impacts of this kind of • Support for the electricity industry aimed at ensuring uncertainty is beyond the scope of this report, which focuses on continuous supply the static price impacts of a carbon scheme. These are all important issues, but beyond our core focus: what 1.1.1 Sectors examined would be the static impact of a carbon price on the costs and competitiveness of Australian industry and households In addition to looking at the impact on households, this report analyses in detail the effect of a carbon price on Australian This report is relevant whether carbon pricing is imposed through production facilities exposed to international competition in the a tax or through a cap and trade scheme. In practice, these 2 Hepburn (2006) 1 Australian Government Treasury (2008) 3 International Energy Agency (2007b) GRATTAN Institute 2010 4 Restructuring the Australian economy to emit less carbon – detailed analysis following industries that will be recipients of free carbon emission worthwhile in the area of chemicals and non-ferrous metal permits worth several billion dollars: smelting (other than Aluminium). • Alumina refining Nonetheless the scope of industries analysed in this study represents 70% of emissions from the emissions intensive and • Coal mining, in particular black coal trade exposed sector of the economy and around a fifth of Australia’s entire greenhouse gas emissions (including their • Liquefied Natural Gas production indirect emissions from electricity consumption. In addition two of the sectors – coal and LNG - are expected to experience • Steel production substantial growth over the next ten years. • Cement clinker production 1.2 Methodology • Aluminium smelting This report looks at the static impact of a carbon price on the costs and competitiveness of Australian industry and households. • Oil refining This approach is deliberately simple and readily transparent. Other industries will also see cost increases as a result of a This static form of analysis is intuitively easier to understand than carbon price, however for most this cost increase will be only dynamic models that are more sophisticated in capturing the small. For some of the industries where the cost increase is more interactions between sectors, but require more complex workings significant, particularly electricity generation and water supply, and assumptions. Carbon pricing may interact dynamically with they are not exposed to international competition and hence will the economy. For example, with a cap and trade scheme, if a face the same regulatory requirement as their competitors. They high emissions industry reduces production, the price of carbon will have the potential to pass on a substantial proportion of the permits would fall for other emitters. With our static analysis, we carbon cost to their customers through higher prices and any have not attempted to model these dynamic interactions, although adjustment will be constrained to movements in production and the results of our static analysis may be useful for building this jobs between facilities within Australia. The remaining industries kind of dynamic model. which are exposed to international competition, and would see significant increase in costs are worthy of analysis. However most Ultimately both static and dynamic analyses are valuable in of these industries are small (in some cases only one facility) and understanding the impact of carbon pricing. This report’s analysis their relative impact on Australia’s emissions is minor which led to should be seen as a complement rather than a replacement for their exclusion from scope. Future study would be most GRATTAN Institute 2010 5 Restructuring the Australian economy to emit less carbon – detailed analysis dynamic modelling exercises such as the Australian • make production unviable (costs would exceed revenue or Government’s Treasury modelling of the CPRS. margins would be reduced to such an extent that they would insufficient to support ongoing investment and cover In our static analysis the assessment process is quite simple and depreciation); readily replicated by others. The aim is to assist in creating a more informed and participatory debate where argument centres • lead to a substantial deterioration in production cost on objective physical characteristics of actual facilities and competitive position relative to facilities overseas on markets, rather than abstract theoretical assumptions for which international cost curves; or agreement may never be reached. • make investment in a new production facility unviable in the For households, we have identified the average current emissions case of LNG (because the additional carbon cost would intensity of the delivered energy goods they purchase – petrol, substantially change the economics and risk of the project electricity
Recommended publications
  • Restructuring the Australian Economy to Emit Less Carbon: Detailed Analysis
    April 2010 Restructuring the Australian Economy to Emit Less Carbon: Detailed Analysis John Daley and Tristan Edis Restructuring the Australian economy to emit less carbon – detailed analysis Founding members Senior Institutional Grattan Institute Report No. 2010-2 April 2010 Affiliates This report of detailed analysis accompanies a publication: National Australia Bank Restructuring the Australian economy to emit less carbon: main report. The main report can be downloaded from the Grattan Institute website This report was written by John Daley, CEO, and Tristan Edis, Research Fellow. Katherine Molyneux, Helen Morrow, Marcus Walsh and Julian Reichl provided extensive research assistance and made substantial contributions to the report. We would like to thank the members of Grattan Institute’s Energy Reference Group for their helpful comments, as well as numerous industry participants and officials for their input. The opinions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Grattan Institute’s founding members, Institutional Affiliates affiliates, individual board members or reference group members. Any remaining errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors. Arup Grattan Institute is an independent think-tank focused on Urbis Australian public policy. Our work is thoughtful, evidence-based, and non-aligned. We aim to improve policy outcomes by engaging with both decision-makers and the community. For further information on Grattan Institute’s Energy program please go to: http://www.grattan.edu.au/programs/energy.php To join our mailing list please go to: http://www.grattan.edu.au/signup.html ISBN: 978-1-925015-03-4 GRATTAN Institute 2010 2 Restructuring the Australian economy to emit less carbon – detailed analysis Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Australia in 2007
    2007 Minerals Yearbook AUSTRALIA U.S. Department of the Interior December 2009 U.S. Geological Survey THE MINERAL INDUS T RY OF AUS T RALIA By Pui-Kwan Tse Australia was one of the world’s leading mineral producing Constitution belong to the States and Territories. All powers that countries and ranked among the top 10 countries in the world in relate to mineral resources and their production belong to the the production of bauxite, coal, cobalt, copper, gem and near- States and Territories. Except for the Australian Capital Territory gem diamond, gold, iron ore, lithium, manganese ore, tantalum, (that is, the capital city Canberra and its environs), all Australian and uranium. Reflecting an increase in world demand for States and Territories have identified mineral resources and mineral commodities, the Australian economy grew at a rate of established mineral industries. 3.9% during 2007. Owing to anticipated higher prices of mineral The Mineral Council of Australia (MCA) urged the Federal commodities in the world markets, the Australian economy Government to establish a nationwide project approval process continued expanding and, as a result, surplus productive that would be consistent across all jurisdictions to reduce capacity was expected in the future. Owing to an increase in regulatory burdens that were affecting the mineral sector. In domestic demand and a tightening in the labor market, the addition, 10 principal statutes govern occupational health and consumer price index increased by 4.2% in 2007. safety in Australia, and, according to the MCA, this multilayer Australia’s total mineral exploration spending, excluding regulatory regime imposes a significant administrative burden petroleum, was $1,751.9 million (A$2,061.1 million) in 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance Strategies to Manage and Monitor Cumulative Impacts at the Local and Regional Level
    ACARP PROJECT C19025 PUBLISHED 1/08/2012 GOVERNANCE STRATEGIES TO MANAGE AND MONITOR CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AT THE LOCAL AND REGIONAL LEVEL Daniel Franks, Jo-Anne Everingham & David Brereton THE UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND DISCLAIMER No person, corporation or other organisation (“person”) should rely on the contents of this report and each should obtain independent advice from a qualified person with respect to the information contained in this report. Australian Coal Research Limited, its directors, servants and agents (collectively “ACR”) is not responsible for the consequences of any action taken by any person in reliance upon the information set out in this report, for the accuracy or veracity of any information contained in this report or for any error or omission in this report. ACR expressly disclaims any and all liability and responsibility to any person in respect of anything done or omitted to be done in respect of the information set out in this report, any inaccuracy in this report or the consequences of any action by any person in reliance, whether wholly or partly, upon the whole or any part of the contents of this report. ACARP Project C19025 Governance Strategies to Manage and Monitor Cumulative Impacts at the Local and Regional Level FINAL REPORT August 2012 Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining Sustainable Minerals Institute The University of Queensland, Australia [email protected] www.csrm.uq.edu.au Research Team David Brereton: Director, CSRM Daniel Franks: Senior Research Fellow, CSRM Jo‐Anne Everingham: Senior Research Fellow, CSRM Madeleine Porter: Research Assistant, CSRM Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining The Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining (CSRM) is a leading research centre, committed to improving the social performance of the resources industry globally.
    [Show full text]
  • Restructuring the Australian Economy to Emit Less Carbon: Main Report
    April 2010 Restructuring the Australian Economy to Emit Less Carbon: Main Report John Daley and Tristan Edis Restructuring the Australian economy to emit less carbon – main report Founding members Senior Institutional Grattan Institute Report No. 2010-2 April 2010 Affiliates This report is accompanied by a publication: Restructuring the National Australia Bank Australian economy to emit less carbon: detailed analysis. The accompanying publication provides supporting analysis and can be downloaded from the Grattan Institute website This report was written by John Daley, CEO, and Tristan Edis, Research Fellow. Katherine Molyneux, Helen Morrow, Marcus Walsh and Julian Reichl provided extensive research assistance and made substantial contributions to the report. We would like to thank the members of Grattan Institute’s Energy Reference Group for their helpful comments, as well as numerous industry participants and officials for their input. The opinions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Grattan Institute’s founding members, Institutional Affiliates affiliates, individual board members or reference group members. Any remaining errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors. Arup Grattan Institute is an independent think-tank focused on Urbis Australian public policy. Our work is thoughtful, evidence-based, and non-aligned. We aim to improve policy outcomes by engaging with both decision-makers and the community. For further information on Grattan Institute’s Energy program please go to: http://www.grattan.edu.au/programs/energy.php To join our mailing list please go to: http://www.grattan.edu.au/signup.html ISBN: 978-1-925015-02-7 GRATTAN Institute 2010 2 Restructuring the Australian economy to emit less carbon – main report Table of Contents Overview................................................................................................4 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Minerals Council of Australia Submission to the Senate Environment and Communications Committee Inquiry Into Australia’S Faunal Extinction Crisis
    MINERALS COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA SUBMISSION TO THE SENATE ENVIRONMENT AND COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE INQUIRY INTO AUSTRALIA’S FAUNAL EXTINCTION CRISIS 5 OCTOBER 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 2 PRESSURES ON AUSTRALIAN BIODIVERSITY.................................................................................. 2 MINING AND BIODIVERSITY ................................................................................................................ 3 REGULATORY AND POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR MINING ................................................................. 7 ENHANCING BIODIVERSITY OUTCOMES .......................................................................................... 9 FURTHER INFORMATION ................................................................................................................... 11 Minerals Council of Australia EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Minerals Council of Australia (MCA) is the peak industry organisation representing Australia’s exploration, mining and minerals processing industry, nationally and internationally, in its contribution to sustainable development and society. The MCA’s strategic objective is to advocate public policy and operational practice for a world-class industry that is safe, profitable, innovative, environmentally
    [Show full text]
  • Industry Experience
    AB Mauri CSR Timber Products Nufarm Coogee ACI Glass Packaging Dyno Nobel Olex Adbri Masonry ESCO OneSteel Adelaide Brighton Fairfax Printers Onslow Salt Albright and Wilson Fletcher Challenge Orica Explosives Allied Mills Fletcher Insulation Orrcon AMCOR GlaxoSmithKline OSI International Amoco Australia Hans Continental Smallgoods Palmer Tube Mills Aperio Group - Finewrap Herron Pharmaceuticals Paperlinx AstraZeneca Holden Pentair Water Austrak - Vehicle Operations Pharmacia Corporation Australian Country Choice - Service Parts Operation Philip Morris Australian Hardboards Hyne and Son Prysmian Cables & Systems Australian Pacific Paper Products Incitec Pivot Queensland Magnesia Australian Paper Innovia Films Ralston Purina Australasian Lubricants Mfg Co. Inova Pharmaceuticals SCA Hygiene Big River Timbers James Hardie Building Products Snack Brands Australia Boeing JDS Uniphase Sunstate Cement Boral Kelloggs Tasman Insulation - Timbers Kraft Foods Ticor Chemical - Construction Materials Lion Nathan Tip Top Calum Textiles Mars Top Taste Cakes Cadbury Schweppes - Snackfood Uncle Ben’s Capral - Food Unilever Foods Carter Holt Harvey - Petfood Vinidex Cheetham Salt Merck Sharp & Dohme Visy Beverage Cartons Chep Merino Visy Paper Ciba Specialty Chemicals MM Kembla Weyerhauser Australia Coca-Cola Amatil National Foods Wellard Feeds Cochlear Nestle Wilson Transformer Colgate-Palmolive Norske Skog CSR Readymix Nufarm AAP Communications Dept. of Agriculture, Fisheries & Forestry Morgan Stanley Abigroup Dept. for Correctional Services. SA Murphy
    [Show full text]
  • Geoscience Australiaaimr03 Australia's Identified Mineral Resources 2003
    GEOSCIENCE AUSTRALIAAIMR03 AUSTRALIA’S IDENTIFIED MINERAL RESOURCES 2003 Greenbushes tantalite concentrates (WA) are exported to America and Germany. Tantalite is used to make capacitors for mobile phones, computers and other electronic devices. Other uses include hi-tech alloys for aerospace and medical applications (Geoscience Australia, Bill McKay). Greenbushes lithium minerals (WA) are used in flat glass, container glass, ceramics, television tubes, glazes, fibre glass, computer monitors and batteries (Geoscience Australia, Bill McKay) AUSTRALIA’S IDENTIFIED MINERAL RESOURCES 2003 FRONT COVER: The Cornwall Pit at Sons of Gwalia Ltd’s Greenbushes operations, Western Australia (Geoscience Australia, Bill McKay). Tantalum, lithium and tin minerals are recovered from pegmatite (white frame) in two distinct areas – tantalum/tin from the Cornwall Pit and lithium from the adjacent Spodumene Pit (see Lithium section). DESIGN AND LAYOUT: Lindy Gratton, Geospatial Applications and Visualisation (GAV), Geoscience Australia. __Australian Government Geoscience Australia Industry, Tourism and Resources Portfolio Minister for Industry, Tourism and Resources: The Hon. Ian Macfarlane, MP. Parliamentary Secretary: The Hon. Warren Entsch, MP __Geoscience Australia* Chief Executive Officer, Geoscience Australia: Dr Neil Williams © Australian Government 2003 This work is copyright. Apart from any fair dealings for the purposes of study, research, criticism, or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Copyright is the responsibility of the Chief Executive Officer, Geoscience Australia. Requests and enquiries should be directed to the Chief Executive Officer, Geoscience Australia, GPO Box 378, Canberra ACT 2601. ABN: 80 091 799 039. Geoscience Australia has tried to make the information in this product as accurate as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Identified 2002 M I N E R a L 2002 Resources
    AIMR_2002_layout 10/22/02 1:18 PM Page 1 GEOSCIENCE AUSTRALIA AUSTRALIA’S IDENTIFIED 2002 MINERAL 2002 RESOURCES 2002 2AUSTRALIA’S0 IDENTIFIED MINERAL0 RESOURCES2 AIMR_2002_layout 10/22/02 1:18 PM Page 3 AUSTRALIA’S IDENTIFIED MINERAL RESOURCES Geoscience Australia Industry, Tourism & Resources Portfolio Minister for Industry, Tourism & Resources: The Hon. Ian Macfarlane, MP. Parliamentary Secretary: The Hon. Warren Entsch, MP Geoscience Australia* Chief Executive Officer: Dr Neil Williams © Commonwealth of Australia 2002 This work is copyright. Apart from any fair dealings for the purposes of study, research, criticism, or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Copyright is the responsibility of the Chief Executive Officer, Geoscience Australia. Requests and enquiries should be directed to the Chief Executive Officer, Geoscience Australia, GPO Box 378, Canberra, ACT 2601. ABN: 80 091 799 039. Geoscience Australia has tried to make the information in this product as accurate as possible. However, it does not guarantee that the information is totally accurate or complete. THEREFORE, YOU SHOULD NOT RELY SOLELY ON THIS INFORMATION WHEN MAKING COMMERCIAL DECISIONS. ISSN 1327-1466 Bibliographic reference, Geoscience Australia 2002. Australia’s identified mineral resources 2002. Geoscience Australia, Canberra. Front cover Ranger uranium processing plant, Alligator Rivers region, Kakadu National Park, Northern Territory (Energy Resources of Australia) Design & layout Karin Weiss, Geospatial Applications & Visualisation (GAV), Geoscience Australia * Geoscience Australia grew out of the Bureau of Mineral Resources (BMR) and the Division of National Mapping, both of which were founded soon after World War 2. BMR became the Australian Geological Survey Organisation (AGSO) in 1992, several years after the Division of National Mapping had become the Australian Surveying and Land Information Group (AUSLIG).
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Banks Financing Coal and Renewable Energy
    Australian banks financing coal and renewable energy A research paper prepared for Greenpeace Australia Pacific Australian banks financing coal and renewable energy A research paper prepared for Greenpeace Australia Final version: 7 September 2010 Jan Willem van Gelder Anna van Ojik Julia Padberg Petra Spaargaren Profundo Radarweg 60 1043 NT Amsterdam The Netherlands Tel: +31-20-8208320 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.profundo.nl Contents Chapter 1 Methodology ..........................................................................................2 1.1 Objective......................................................................................................2 1.2 Definitions ...................................................................................................2 1.3 Research activities......................................................................................2 Chapter 2 Bank profiles..........................................................................................5 2.1 Australia and New Zealand Banking Group (ANZ)....................................5 2.2 Bendigo Bank..............................................................................................7 2.3 Commonwealth Bank..................................................................................8 2.4 mecu ............................................................................................................9 2.5 National Australia Bank ............................................................................10 2.6
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Canada's Mining Industry
    The State of Canada’s Mining Industry 1 TITLE THE MINING ASSOCIATION OF CANADA The Mining Association of Canada (MAC) is the national organization of the Canadian mining industry. We represent companies involved in mineral exploration, mining, smelting, refining and semi-fabrication. Our member companies account for most of Canada’s output of metals and minerals. MAC’s functions include advocacy, stewardship and collaboration. Our goals are to promote the industry’s interests nationally and internationally, to work with governments on policies affecting minerals, to inform the public and to encourage member firms to cooperate to solve common problems. We work closely with provincial and territorial mining associations, other industries, and environmental and community groups in Canada and around the world. DATA AND SOURCES This annual report reflects currently available data, the majority from 2019, though some from prior years and some from 2020. Dollar amounts are expressed in Canadian dollars unless noted otherwise. Author: Brendan Marshall, Vice President, Economic and Northern Affairs Design: McKenna Design & Strategy Acknowledgments: This report could not have been prepared without the significant assistance of the dedicated staff of the Minerals and Metals Sector at Natural Resources Canada. Special thanks are also extended to Cynthia Waldmeier from MAC and Monique Laflèche. 2 TITLE TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES 04 LIST OF ANNEXES 05 STATE OF THE INDUSTRY AND KEY ISSUES 06 MINING: MINERALS AND METALS ARE ESSENTIAL TO OUR EVERY DAY LIVES 09 1. MINING AND THE CANADIAN ECONOMY 10 Global Economic Trends 10 Mining’s Contribution to the Canadian Economy 13 Mining in the Provinces and Territories 14 Taxes and Other Payments to Governments 16 Indirect Contributions to Mining Industry Suppliers 16 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Management Water Management the Mining Industry Development Program for for Program Development
    LEADING PRACTICE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR THE MINING INDUSTRY WATER MANAGEMENT WATER LEADING PRACTICE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR THE MINING INDUSTRY WATER MANAGEMENT WATER MAY 2008 MAY Disclaimer This publication has been developed by an expert working group of representatives from industry, government, research and non-government organisations. The efforts of the members of the working group are gratefully acknowledged. The views and opinions expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the Commonwealth Government or the Minister for Resources and Energy. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Users of this handbook should bear in mind that it is intended as a general reference and is not intended to replace the need for professional advice relevant to the particular circumstances of individual users. Reference to companies or products in this handbook should not be taken as Commonwealth Government endorsement of those companies or their products. Cover image: Aerial photograph of Ranger Uranium mine in the Northern Territory. ©Energy Resources of Australia Ltd ISBN 6 642 72605 1 © Commonwealth of Australia This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under
    [Show full text]
  • Crclemear0708.Pdf
    Our vision is of an environmentally healthy, wealthy Australia where regolith geoscience plays a fundamental role in mineral discovery and land management. Our mission is to create breakthroughs in mineral exploration and environmental management through generating and applying new knowledge of the regolith. In doing so we will develop LEME and its core participants into global leaders in regolith research and its application to mineral exploration and natural resources management. The objectives of CRC LEME are to: 2 Executive Summary 11 Reflections Provide the mineral industry with world-leading capabilities leading to breakthroughs in exploration in 20 Context and Major Developments During the Year Australia’s extensive areas of cover. 21 National Research Priorities Provide essential multidisciplinary knowledge of 24 Governance and Management Australia’s regolith environments, to deliver this 28 Research Programs knowledge in readily useable forms, and ensure that it 28 Research activities and achievements is transferred into practice in the minerals industry and environmental management. 54 Research collaborations 61 Commercialisation and Utilisation Provide high quality, geoscience-based education for those entering the minerals industry, land-care and 61 Commercialisation and Utilisation Strategies and Activities environmental realms and to provide continuing 61 Intellectual Property Management education for those already involved. 62 Communications and Publications Inform and guide decision-makers in the Federal and 88 End-User
    [Show full text]