T RANSBAY - BLOCK 3 PARK Community Meeting 4 | April, 29 2021
The Webinar Presentation will start momentarily. Please wait!
If you would like to keep the interpeter’s video on, please click on the 3 dots on the upper right corner of the interpreter’s video and select “Pin” TONIGHT'S PROGRAM
TIME: INTRODUCTION: OCII & RPD - PROJECT & TEAM BACKGROUND 5 MINUTES - POLL PRESENTATION: DESIGN TEAM I - PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OVERVIEW AND FEEDBACK 25 MINUTES II - PROGRAM & MAIN STREET UPDATE III - STEWARDSHIP BUILDING OPTIONS IV - PLAYGROUND OPTIONS FEEDBACK: COMMUNITY - PUBLIC COMMENT - Q&A 30 MINUTES - ONLINE FEEDBACK SURVEY NEXT STEPS - PROJECT SCHEDULE
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 2 Internal Design Review | April 2021 WELCOME & THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING! YOUR INPUT IS INVALUABLE PROJECT TEAM:
• OFFICE OF COMMUNITY INVESTMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE (OCII) LAURA SHIFLEY - PROJECT MANAGER / ASSOCIATE PLANNER, URBAN DESIGNER BENJAMIN BRANDIN - ACTING TRANSBAY PROJECT MANAGER SALLY OERTH - INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ALOK VYAS - ASSOCIATE PLANNER, URBAN DESIGNER
• SAN FRANCISCO RECREATION AND PARKS MONICA SCOTT - PROJECT MANAGER STACY BRADLEY - DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PLANNING YAEL GOLAN - PLANNER ERIC ANDERSEN - SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKS AND OPEN SPACE STEVE CISMOWSKI - PARK SERVICE MANAGER
• SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC WORKS KATHLEEN O’DAY - PROJECT MANAGER BRETT DESMARAIS - DESIGN LIZZY HIRSCH - PROJECT LEAD FOR DESIGN TEAM LAWRENCE CUEVAS - DESIGN EOANNA GOODWIN - DESIGN VERONICA CHAN - DESIGN ERICA RUIZ - DESIGN WINNIE CHANG - DESIGN BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 3 Internal Design Review | April 2021 VIRTUAL MEETING FEEDBACK OVERVIEW
HOW TO PROVIDE FEEDBACK:
• PLEASE ENTER ALL QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, OR FEEDBACK INTO THE Q&A AT ANY POINT DURING THE PRESENTATION
• QUESTIONS WILL BE READ AND ANSWERED ALOUD DURING THE Q&A PERIOD FOLLOWING THE PRESENTATION
• A SUMMARY OF THE Q&A, INCLUDING ANY OUTSTANDING QUESTIONS THAT WERE NOT ANSWERED DURING THE MEETING, WILL BE POSTED TO THE PROJECT WEBSITE FOLLOWING THIS MEETING
• AGREE TO BE OPEN MINDED, LISTEN TO EACH OTHER’S IDEAS, COMMUNICATE WITH RESPECT
NOTE: THIS IS A WEBINAR FORMAT AND ONLY PANELISTS AND MODERATORS WILL BE SEEN OR HEARD. ADDITIONALLY, IT IS BEING RECORDED FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.
POST-MEETING SURVEY LINK:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/TB3ParkCM4Survey
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 4 Internal Design Review | April 2021 POLL
DID YOU ATTEND BLOCK 3 PARK COMMUNITY MEETING #3 IN NOVEMBER 2020?
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 5 Internal Design Review | April 2021 PARK DEVELOPMENT
MEETING 1: MARCH 2020
INITIAL DESIGN INSPIRATION
CLIMATE MEETING 2: SEPTEMBER 2020 COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSIVE COMMUNITY DESIGN OUTREACH DESIGN ALTERNATIVES
MEETING 3: NOVEMBER, 2020 PLACE-BASED DESIGN CONCEPTS DESIGN SYNTHESIS
MEETING 4: APRIL 29, 2021
DESIGN UPDATE: DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PLAYGROUND & STEWARDSHIP
RPD COMMISSION OCII COMMISION
COMMUNITY INPUT SCHEDULE
CBD - Park RPD Monitoring - Security Patrols - Park Ownership - Movable - Facility Furniture Deployment management - Maintenance - Permitting - Programming - Reservations
JOINT
OWNERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT EAST CUT COMMUNITY BENEFIT DISTRCIT (CBD) BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 6 Community Meeting 3 | 11.18.2020 PART I - PROJECT OVERVIEW & FEEDBACK
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 7 Internal Design Review | April 2021 SITE: CONTEXTUAL FRAMEWORK
BLOCK 4
BLOCKPARK 3
BLOCK 2
0 0.5 1 Miles BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 8 Community Meeting 3 | 11.18.2020 EXISTING SITE:
MAIN ST LOOKING NORTHWEST
BEALE ST LOOKING NORTH BEALE ST LOOKING NORTHEAST
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 9 Community Meeting 3 | 11.18.2020 FERRY BUILDING
DRUMM STREET BLOCK 3 ADJACENT OPEN SPACE
CALIFORNIA STREET
DAVIS STREET RINCON PARK
STEUART STREET
PG&E SF BAY
FRONT STREET
RINCON MARKET STREET RINCON CENTER PARK
USF SCHOOL OF BATTERY STREET BATTERY MANAGEMENT
BUSH STREET MISSION STREET
GAP HQ
THE EMBARCADERO SANSOME STREET SANSOME PARK TOWER SUTTER STREET BAY BRIDGE HOWARD STREET
BLOCK 4 SPEAR STREET TRANSBAY
SALESFORCE TOWER FDIC HILLS PLAZA PARK ECKER STREETELIM ALLEY BLOCKPARK 3 INFINITY FUTURE
GOLDENGATE MONTGOMERY STREET MONTGOMERY AFFORDABLE UNIVERSITY HOUSING JESSIE STREET MAIN STREET POST STREET BLOCK 2 GAP STEVENSON STREET FOLSOM STREET ANTHONY STREET DIGITALDATA REALITY CENTER
LUMINA CLEMENTINA STREET FOUNDRY SQUARE BEALE STREET SOLAIRE
MISSION STREET BAY AREA PORTSIDE 101 METRO CENTER
2ND ST SALESFORCE PARK (ELEVATED) PLACE ZENO
FREMONT STREET333 TEHAMA STREET FREMONT HARRISON STREET
PG&E
SUBSTATION NATOMA STREET 399
FREMONT 1ST STREET UNDER RAMP 340 MALDEN ALLEY THE FREMONT
UNDER RAMPSTREET ECKER METROPOLITAN PARK
PARK (FUTURE) SAILORS MINNA STREET UNIONTHE OF (FUTURE) PACIFIC BRYANT STREET GUY PLACE RINCON GREEN APARTMENTS
COURTYARDMARRIOTT BY JASPER LANSING STREET HILL Base map courtesy of The East Cut CBD ONE RINCON
TERRA GALLERY 2ND STREET BLOCK 3 PARK 303 2ND ST Building Design & Construction PG. 10 Community Meeting 3 | 11.18.2020
RINCON STREET STERLING STREET
I 80
FEDERAL STREET NEIGHBORING BLOCK DEVELOPMENTS Neighboring Block Designs Howard Street HOWARD STREET
DRAFT TB4TB 4 Phase - Schematic
TEHAMATEHAMA
TB3TB3 Phase - Schematic MAIN STREET BEALE STREET Beale Street Main Street
CLEMENTINACLEMENTINA
TB2TB2 Phase - Conceptual
DRAFT
Drawing Scale FolsomFOLSOM Street STREET TRANSBAY BLOCK 2 BLOCK 3 PARK TB3 Park Meeting Building Design & Construction PG. 11 Internal Design Review | April 2021 29 January, 2021 PREFERRED PLAN Community Meeting #3
THE CLEARING THE COMMONS THE RIPPLE
OPEN FLEXIBLE SPACES GATHERING SPACES SEATING PLAY BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 12 Community Meeting 3 | 11.18.2020 PREFERRED DESIGN ALTERNATIVE Community Meeting #3
Tehama
Tehama Main Beale
Grove Dog Relief Upper Deck 760 SF 2,500 SF Clementina Meadow
Stewardship Lower Deck Building 950 SF
Jc Decaux Legend Beale Main Major Circulation Playground Grove Minor Circulation
Open Flexible Spaces
Clementina Gathering Spaces
Seating
Play
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 13 Internal Design Review | April 2021 COMPOSITE SURVEY RESULTS Community Meeting #3
WHO? 223 total respondents CLEARING CONCEPT
17% attended community meeting 1 Are you in favor of the final concept design presented at Community Meeting 3? 14% attended community meeting 2
94% live in the neighborhood NO 68% work in the neighborhood 8% 26% have children
23% have dogs 28% NO RESPONSE Note: for Community Meeting 3 = 79 attendees YES 64%
Age of Respondents: 55+ 22% 20-35 33.5%
45%
35-55 BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 14 Internal Design Review | April 2021 BIRD'S EYE VIEW LOOKING NORTHEAST TOWARDS MAIN ST Tehama Main Beale
Clementina
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 15 Internal Design Review | April 2021 DECK VIEW Tehama Main Beale
Clementina
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 16 Community Meeting 3 | 11.18.2020 PART I I - PROGRAM & MAIN STREET UPDATE
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 17 Internal Design Review | April 2021 BLOCK 3 ADJACENT PROGRAMS WITHIN A 10 MIN. WALK: DOG, CHILDCARE, PLAYGROUNDS, AND RESTROOMS
LEGEN
LOC PAR UTURE CHILDCARE
PLAYGROUND
UTURE DOG LOCATION
RESTROOM
MINUTE AL ING RADIUS
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 18 Internal Design Review | April 2021 MAIN STREET/DOG RELIEF ZONE
Tehama Beale Main
Clementina
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 19 Internal Design Review | April 2021 MAIN STREET/DOG RELIEF ZONE Main
Main St Tehama Clementina
Beale Tehama Clementina
INITIAL CONCEPT
Main St Tehama Clementina
UPDATED DESIGN
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 20 Internal Design Review | April 2021 MAIN STREET/DOG RELIEF ZONE
Street Edge: Living Street Zone Dog Relief Zone Surface Material Options: Permeable concrete paving or artificial turf
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 21 Internal Design Review | April 2021 PART III - STEWARDSHIP BUILDING OPTIONS
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 22 Internal Design Review | April 2021 STEWARDSHIP BUILDING
Tehama Beale Main
Clementina
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 23 Internal Design Review | April 2021 BEALE/TEHAMA CORNER ENTRANCE VIEW LOOKING SOUTHEAST Tehama Main Beale
Clementina
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 24 Internal Design Review | April 2021 STEWARDSHIP BUILDING Community Preferences from Meeting #3
32% 24% 22% STEWARDSHIP BUILDING A lasting structure that - Draws neighbors to the park - Illuminates from within - Stores furniture and maintenance materials
12% 10%
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 25 Internal Design Review | April 2021 STEWARDSHIP BUILDING Option 1: ENVELOP 300 sf FORM INSPIRATION FORM MATERIAL INSPIRATION MATERIAL
MAINTENANCE Beale STORAGE Beale COMMUNITY STORAGE FLOOR PLAN FLOOR
Clementina SITE PLAN BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 26 Internal Design Review | April 2021
STEWARDSHIP BUILDING Option 1: ENVELOP 300 sf Beale
Clementina
Daytime View - Looking West onto Beale Street BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 27 Internal Design Review | April 2021
STEWARDSHIP BUILDING Option 1: ENVELOP 300 sf Beale
Clementina
Nighttime View- Looking West onto Beale Street BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 28 Internal Design Review | April 2021 STEWARDSHIP BUILDING Option 2: BOW 300 sf FORM INSPIRATION FORM MATERIAL INSPIRATION MATERIAL Beale COMMUNITY STORAGE Beale FLOOR PLAN FLOOR
MAINTENANCE STORAGE Clementina SITE PLAN BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 29 Internal Design Review | April 2021
STEWARDSHIP BUILDING Option 2: BOW 300 sf Beale
Clementina
Daytime View - Looking West onto Beale Street BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 30 Internal Design Review | April 2021
STEWARDSHIP BUILDING Option 2: BOW 300 sf Beale
Clementina
Daytime View - Looking South onto Beale Street BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 31 Internal Design Review | April 2021
STEWARDSHIP BUILDING Option 2: BOW 300 sf Beale
Clementina
Nighttime View- Looking South onto Beale Street BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 32 Internal Design Review | April 2021 STEWARDSHIP BUILDING Option 1: Envelop Option 2: Bow
Prismatic form Organic form frames views to each corner Offset location within grove Central location within grove Responds to new architectural forms nearby Replicates curves from site design Perforated metal skin Earthy materials and color palette Can glow internally at night Integrated with landscape
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 33 Internal Design Review | April 2021 PART IV - PLAYGROUND OPTIONS
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 34 Internal Design Review | April 2021 PLAYGROUND
Tehama Beale Main
Clementina
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 35 Internal Design Review | April 2021 PLAYGROUND PROGRAM AGE RANGE OPTIONS Community Meeting #3 Preferences
BLOCK 3 PLAYGROUND SALESFORCE PLAYGROUND MOSCONE EAST PLAYGROUND SOUTH PARK 3,800 SQ FT 2,600 SQ FT 2,000 SF + 3,600 SF PLAYGROUND 3,100 SF
0-5 yrs toddler 0-5 yrs or 5-12 yrs combined age 0-12 yrs? 0-12 yrs
5-12 yrs
PERCENTAGE VOTES FOR EACH OPTION: for toddler 26% 0-5 yrs
for combined age 74% 0-12 yrs
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 36 Internal Design Review | April 2021 PLAY INSPIRATION Community Meeting #3 Preferences Which of the following images are you most drawn to for each of the two age brackets listed below? TODDLER PLAY 0-5 YRS PLAY TODDLER
38% 33% 29% COMBINED AGES PLAY 0-12 YRS PLAY AGES COMBINED 47% 30% 23% BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 37 Internal Design Review | April 2021 PLAY ELEMENTS Community Meeting #3 Preferences Which of the images below of different play types would you like to see incorporated in the playground’s design?
STRUCTURE BASED PLAY BASED STRUCTURE 38% 28% 17% 17% IMAGINATIVE PLAY IMAGINATIVE 49% 26% 14% 11%
INTERACTIVE ELEMENTS INTERACTIVE 42% 28% 20% 10% BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 38 Internal Design Review | April 2021 PLAY ELEMENTS Community Meeting #3 Preferences How important to you that each of the following play elements are included in the playground’s design?
Rank 5 4 3 2 1 most important least important
Swinging 44 25 21 10 18
Sliding 40 25 24 12 14
Climbing 37 30 17 16 15
Sand Play 15 10 13 15 60
Spinning 11 18 29 19 38
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 39 Internal Design Review | April 2021 PLAYGROUND DEVELOPMENT: INTERTIDAL INSPIRATION
Illustration from Natural History of SF Bay by A. Rubissow Okamoto and K. Wong View of playground site from Beale/Clementina park entry corner
Brown Pelican
Brown Pelican Eel Grass Bufflehead Duck Play Interpretation SITE PLAN WITH PLAYGROUND OPTION 1
Tehama Main Beale *
Playground Entry Clementina *
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 41 Internal Design Review | April 2021 PLAYGROUND - OPTION 1
+0”
D A B C
B G E F +18” D 4.5%
A Waterfowl Play Structure Example (actual design would be customized to fit site character)
F Saucer Swing B Reed Poles
C Picnic Tables D Boulder Steps E Custom Tower w/ Slide G Teeter-totter PLAYGROUND - OPTION 1 ALTERNATE
SCULPTURAL WATERFOWL PLAY STRUCTURE TIMBER PLAY STRUCTURE - ALTERNATE
OR
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 43 Internal Design Review | April 2021 SITE PLAN WITH PLAYGROUND OPTION 2
Tehama Main Beale * Playground Entry Clementina *
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 44 Internal Design Review | April 2021 PLAYGROUND - OPTION 2
4.5%
4.5% F C D B +0” +18” A C F +0” G E
A Waterfowl Play Structure Example (actual design would be customized to fit site character)
C Reed Poles E Toddler Swing
B Rope Swing D Picnic Tables F Hexagon Steps G Wave Climber PLAYGROUND - OPTION 2 ALTERNATE
SCULPTURAL WATERFOWL PLAY STRUCTURE TOWER PLAY STRUCTURE - ALTERNATE
OR
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 46 Internal Design Review | April 2021 PLAYGROUND - OPTION COMPARISON Option 1: Integrated Play Option 2: Zoned Play
Supports mixed- Separates toddler play age play on park from school age play by level and provides a stepped 18” elevation school age play at change elevated corner MIXED SCHOOL AGES AGE SCHOOL TOTS AGE
Park Level Elevated (18") Elevated (18") Park Level Elevated (18") Park Level Diagrammatic Section Diagrammatic Section
4.5%
+0”
+0” +18” +18” +0”
4.5%
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 47 Internal Design Review | April 2021 PLAYGROUND - SWING OPTIONS
Multi-user Swing Toddler Swing
A B C Saucer Swing Rope Swing 3-Tier Swing
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 48 Internal Design Review | April 2021 Q&A SESSION
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 49 Internal Design Review | April 2021 SITE PLAN
Tehama
Grove Upper Deck 2,500 SF Meadow Dog Relief 760 SF Stewardship Lower Deck Building 950 SF Jc Decaux Beale Main Playground Grove
Clementina
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 51 Internal Design Review | April 2021 PROJECT SCHEDULE
PROJECT SCHEDULE: DECEMBER 2019 - FEBRUARY 2025 CONCEPT/PLANNING 11 MONTHS DEC, 2019 - MID NOV, 2020 SCHEMATIC DESIGN 8.5 MONTHS MID NOV, 2020 - JULY, 2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 5 MONTHS AUG, 2021 - DEC, 2021 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 8 MONTHS JAN, 2022 - AUG, 2022 BID/AWARD 4.5 MONTHS SEP, 2022 - JAN, 2023 CONSTRUCTION 24 MONTHS FEB, 2023 - FEB 2025 MEETING 1: MARCH 2020
INITIAL DESIGN INSPIRATION
CONCEPT PHASE - OUTREACH SCHEDULE MEETING 2: SEPTEMBER 2020
COMMUNITY MEETING 1: INFORMATION GATHERING DESIGN ALTERNATIVES
COMMUNITY MEETING 2: INITIAL DESIGN IDEAS MEETING 3: NOVEMBER, 2020
COMMUNITY MEETING 3: DESIGN REFINEMENT, PUBLIC SURVEYS DESIGN SYNTHESIS
MEETING 4: APRIL 29, 2021
DESIGN UPDATE: SCHEMATIC PHASE - COMMUNITY UPDATE PLAYGROUND & STEWARDSHIP
COMMUNITY MEETING 4: DESIGN UPDATE: PLAYGROUND FOCUS RPD COMMISSION OCII COMMISION
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 54 Internal Design Review | April 2021 CONTACT
PLEASE FILL OUT THE SURVEY WITHIN THE NEXT TWO WEEKS: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/TB3ParkCM4Survey
FOR REGULAR UPDATES, VISIT THE PUBLIC WORKS WEBSITE: http://sfpublicworks.org/Block3Park
BLOCK 3 PARK
FOR QUESTIONS OR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT KATHLEEN O’DAY: [email protected]; (415) 218-7515
BLOCK 3 PARK Building Design & Construction PG. 55 Internal Design Review | April 2021