DOCSLIB.ORG

Travel Management on the Tonto National Forest FEIS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Travel Management on the Tonto National Forest FEIS United States Department of Agriculture Travel Management on the Tonto National Forest Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume II–Response to Comments Tonto Publ. No MB-R3-12-04 Forest Service National Forest June 2016 1 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected]. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender. Printed on recycled paper. Travel Management on the Tonto National Forest Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Content Analysis of Public Comment on the Draft EIS .................................................................. 2 Considering Different Types of Comments under NEPA ........................................................... 2 Comments Specific to Routes ...................................................................................................... 2 Comments and Responses................................................................................................................ 4 Transportation Facilities .............................................................................................................. 4 Recreation Resources ................................................................................................................ 11 Wilderness, Wild and Scenic Rivers, Inventoried Roadless Areas, and Special Management . 44 Visual Resources/Scenery ......................................................................................................... 59 Socioeconomics ......................................................................................................................... 61 Cultural Resources ..................................................................................................................... 62 Game and Nongame Species ..................................................................................................... 63 Law Enforcement ...................................................................................................................... 71 Soils and Water Resources ........................................................................................................ 87 Air Quality ................................................................................................................................. 93 Climate Change ....................................................................................................................... 102 Specific Routes ........................................................................................................................ 104 Maps and GIS Data ................................................................................................................. 139 Implementation ........................................................................................................................ 144 Invasive Species ...................................................................................................................... 147 Power Company and Utilities .................................................................................................. 148 Public Involvement .................................................................................................................. 157 General Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 162 Purpose and Need .................................................................................................................... 170 Specific Alternatives................................................................................................................ 173 General Comments and Responses .......................................................................................... 187 i Volume II–Response to Comments Introduction This appendix includes a description of the formal public comment analysis and response to comment process and the comments received during the draft EIS comment period. Comments and our responses are organized by sections to mirror the order of the resource topics in the final EIS. This appendix also includes copies of the city, county, state, Federal, and Tribal agency letters received. As a Federal agency, we are required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to invite comments, After preparing a draft environmental impact statement and before preparing a final environmental impact statement the agency shall: (1) Obtain the comments of any Federal agency which has jurisdiction by law or special expertise with respect to any environmental impact involved or which is authorized to develop and enforce environmental standards. (2) Request the comments of: (i) Appropriate State and local agencies which are authorized to develop and enforce environmental standards; (ii) Indian tribes, when the effects may be on a reservation; and (iii) Any agency which has requested that it receive statements on actions of the kind proposed… (3) Request comments from the applicant, if any. (4) Request comments from the public, affirmatively soliciting comments from those persons or organizations who may be interested or affected. (40 CFR 1503.1(a)) On July 2, 2014, the notice of availability for the draft EIS was published in the Federal Register, marking the beginning of the 45-calendar-day comment period for this project. In response to several requests, Neil Bosworth, Supervisor of the Tonto National Forest, decided to extend the 45-day comment period by an additional 30 calendar days. On August 15, 2014, a notice to extend the comment period on the draft EIS was published in the Federal Register, extending the comment period to September 17, 2014. Approximately 2,500 comments were received during the comment period: 85 were original letters, while the rest were form letters generated by stakeholder groups. NEPA also provides direction on the specificity of comments, indicating that, “comments on an environmental impact statement or on a proposed action shall be as specific as possible and may address either the adequacy of the statement or the merits of the alternatives discussed or both” (40 CFR 1503.3(a)). In addition, regulations specific to the Forest Service (36 CFR 218) require that to participate in a Project-level Predecisional Administrative Review Process, specific written comments must be submitted. Written comments are those submitted to the responsible official or designee during a designated opportunity for public participation (§ 218.5(a)) provided for a proposed project. Written comments can include submission of transcriptions or other notes from oral statements or presentation. For the purposes of this rule, specific written comments should be within the scope 1 Travel Management on the Tonto National Forest of the proposed action, have a direct relationship to the proposed action, and must include supporting reasons for the responsible official to consider. (§ 218.2) (emphasis added) Finally, NEPA provides direction to Federal agencies related to responding to comments. Specifically, An agency preparing a final environmental impact statement shall assess and consider comments both individually and collectively, and shall respond by one or more of the means listed below, stating its response in the final statement. Possible responses are to: (1) Modify alternatives including the proposed action. (2) Develop and evaluate alternatives not previously given serious consideration by the agency. (3) Supplement, improve, or modify its analyses. (4) Make factual corrections. (5) Explain why the comments do not warrant further agency response, citing the sources, authorities, or reasons which support the agency's position
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Lower Gila Region, Arizona
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR HUBERT WORK, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 498 THE LOWER GILA REGION, ARIZONA A GEOGBAPHIC, GEOLOGIC, AND HTDBOLOGIC BECONNAISSANCE WITH A GUIDE TO DESEET WATEEING PIACES BY CLYDE P. ROSS WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1923 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAT BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 50 CENTS PEE COPY PURCHASER AGREES NOT TO RESELL OR DISTRIBUTE THIS COPT FOR PROFIT. PUB. RES. 57, APPROVED MAT 11, 1822 CONTENTS. I Page. Preface, by O. E. Melnzer_____________ __ xr Introduction_ _ ___ __ _ 1 Location and extent of the region_____._________ _ J. Scope of the report- 1 Plan _________________________________ 1 General chapters _ __ ___ _ '. , 1 ' Route'descriptions and logs ___ __ _ 2 Chapter on watering places _ , 3 Maps_____________,_______,_______._____ 3 Acknowledgments ______________'- __________,______ 4 General features of the region___ _ ______ _ ., _ _ 4 Climate__,_______________________________ 4 History _____'_____________________________,_ 7 Industrial development___ ____ _ _ _ __ _ 12 Mining __________________________________ 12 Agriculture__-_______'.____________________ 13 Stock raising __ 15 Flora _____________________________________ 15 Fauna _________________________ ,_________ 16 Topography . _ ___ _, 17 Geology_____________ _ _ '. ___ 19 Bock formations. _ _ '. __ '_ ----,----- 20 Basal complex___________, _____ 1 L __. 20 Tertiary lavas ___________________ _____ 21 Tertiary sedimentary formations___T_____1___,r 23 Quaternary sedimentary formations _'__ _ r- 24 > Quaternary basalt ______________._________ 27 Structure _______________________ ______ 27 Geologic history _____ _____________ _ _____ 28 Early pre-Cambrian time______________________ .
    [Show full text]
  • Tonto National Forest Travel Management Plan
    Comments on the DEIS for the Tonto National Forest Travel Management Plan Submitted September 15, 2014 via Electronic Mail and Certified Mail #7014-0150-0001-2587-0812 On Behalf of: Archaeology Southwest Center for Biological Diversity Sierra Club The Wilderness Society WildEarth Guardians Table of Contents II. Federal Regulation of Travel Management .................................................................................. 4 III. Impacts from Year Round Motorized Use Must be Analyzed .................................................. 5 IV. The Forest Service’s Preferred Alternative .............................................................................. 6 V. Desired Conditions for Travel Management ................................................................................. 6 VI. Purpose and Need Statements ................................................................................................... 7 VII. Baseline Determination .............................................................................................................. 8 A. The Forest Service cannot arbitrarily reclassify roads as “open to motor vehicle use” in the baseline. ............................................................................................................................................ 10 B. Classification of all closed or decommissioned routes as “open to motor vehicle use” leads to mischaracterization of the impacts of the considered alternatives. ...................................................... 11 C. Failure
    [Show full text]
  • Water and Riparian Resource Report
    Four Forest Restoration Initiative, Rim Country EIS DRAFT Water and Riparian Resource Report Prepared by: Paul Brown Watershed Program Manager, ASNF for: 4FRI Rim Country EIS Date 5/16/2019 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992.
    [Show full text]
  • Tonto National Forest 2019 LRMP Biological Opinion
    United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Arizona Ecological Services Office 9828 North 31st Avenue #C3 Phoenix, Arizona 85051-2517 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 Fax: (602) 242-2513 In reply, refer to: AESO/SE 02E00000-2012-F-0011-R001/02EAAZ00-2020-F-0206 December 17, 2019 Mr. Neil Bosworth, Forest Supervisor Tonto National Forest Supervisor’s Office 2324 East McDowell Road Phoenix, Arizona 85006 RE: Continued Implementation of the Tonto National Forest’s Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP) for the Mexican Spotted Owl and its Designated Critical Habitat Dear Mr. Bosworth: This document transmits our biological opinion (BO) for the reinitiation of formal consultation pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. § 1531-1544), as amended (ESA or Act), for the Tonto National Forest’s (NF) Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP). The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) and Forest Service are conducting this reinitiation in response to a September 12, 2019, court order in WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4:13-CV-00151-RCC. In response to this court order, as well as updated information regarding subjects in the BO, and current regulation and policy, we are updating the Status of the Species, Environmental Baseline, Effects of the Action, Cumulative Effects, and Incidental Take Statement sections of the April 30, 2012, Tonto NF LRMP BO (02E00000-2012-F-0011). We received your updated Biological Assessment (BA) on November 23, 2019. We are consulting on effects to the threatened Mexican spotted owl (Strix occidentalis lucida) (spotted owl or owl) and its critical habitat from the Forest Services’ continued implementation of the Tonto NF’s LRMP.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona´S Public Lands
    52 OF THE STATE’S SCENIC WONDERS JANUARY 2018 ESCAPE • EXPLORE • EXPERIENCE EXPLORE ARIZONA´S PUBLIC LANDS P.S. THIS LAND IS YOUR LAND 2 EDITOR’S LETTER 16 OPEN TO THE PUBLIC 52 SCENIC DRIVE For nearly a century, Arizona Highways Agua Caliente Road: With all of the farm- 3 CONTRIBUTORS has been showcasing the scenic beauty land, stockyards and solar panels around Grand Canyon National Park of the forty-eighth state. There’s a lot of Gila Bend, it might come as a surprise 4 LETTERS Jerome ground to cover, and more than a third of that there’s a scenic drive in the area, too, Hellsgate January 2018 it is located on public lands — this land but this historic route fits the bill. Wilderness 5 THE JOURNAL is your land. It’s too much to present By Noah Austin PHOENIX People, places and things from around comprehensively, so we’ve narrowed the Photographs by Jim Marshall the state, including a restaurant in list of great outdoor places to 52 … one Gila Bend Jerome called Grapes — it’s not “another for each weekend of the year. 54 HIKE OF THE MONTH tourist trap,” the owner says; the history Edited by Robert Stieve Tucson behind Bisbee’s $2 million tunnel; and Blackett’s Ridge Trail: The payoff on this Bisbee a former cattle ranch near Tucson that hike is one of the best panoramas in the 42 ROUGH COUNTRY Santa Catalina Mountains. But getting now features luxury casitas, a nature POINTS OF INTEREST IN THIS ISSUE trail and the toy-like squeaks of Gila An Essay by Kelly Vaughn there takes some doing.
    [Show full text]
  • Janet F. Barstad Curriculum Vitae
    Janet F. Barstad Curriculum Vitae Education 1981 M.S. Botany, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 1960 B.A. History, Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont Graduate research & teaching assistantships, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona Research: Arizona State University; Salt River Project; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; USDA Forest Service. Teaching: Plant Ecology; Survey of the Plant Kingdom; Biology for Majors; Plant Morphology. Master’s Thesis: Factors controlling plant distribution in a riparian deciduous forest in southeastern Arizona. Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, 1981. Educational Affiliations 2006 - Adjunct Faculty Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies (ACMRS) Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona Employment 2004-present Chronognostic Research Foundation, Inc. (nonprofit corporation) founder and president; www.chronognostic.org 2000-2004 Bureau of Census, U.S. Department of Commerce Census 2000 crew leader; Survey of Construction field representative 1986-present Arizona Highways Magazine, Phoenix, Arizona contributor: writing and photography 1984-present Freelance writing, photography, graphic arts, botany&ecology Founded Prose & Images (sole proprietorship) 1982-1984 Desert Botanical Garden, Phoenix, Arizona publications director 1977-1981 Rocky Mountain Forest & Range Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, Arizona State University biologic aide, biologic technician Janet F. Barstad 2 1976-1981 Division of Agriculture (Natural Resources) and Department of Botany & Microbiology Arizona
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Stage Exhumation History of the Orocopia Schist of Southern California and Southwestern Arizona Rachel Elena Lishansky Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2011 Multi-stage exhumation history of the Orocopia schist of southern California and southwestern Arizona Rachel Elena Lishansky Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Lishansky, Rachel Elena, "Multi-stage exhumation history of the Orocopia schist of southern California and southwestern Arizona" (2011). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 10472. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/10472 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Multi-stage exhumation history of the Orocopia schist of southern California and southwestern Arizona by Rachel Elena Lishansky A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Geology Program of Study Committee: Carl E. Jacobson, Co-Major Professor Chris Harding, Co-Major Professor Paul G. Spry Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2011 Copyright © Rachel Elena Lishansky, 2011. All rights reserved. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF TABLES x LIST OF PLATES x ABSTRACT xi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 2. GEOLOGIC
    [Show full text]
  • Tonto and Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests
    United States Environmental Assessment Department of Agriculture for Forest Service Southwestern Region Heber-Reno/Morgan Mountain Sheep Driveways Tonto and Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests Figure 1. Original sheep driveways vicinity map The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual‟s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA‟s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Printed on recycled paper – February, 2011 Contents Summary ................................................................................................................................................ v Chapter 1 – Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................... 1 Background ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior
    United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Arizona Ecological Services Office 9828 North 31st Avenue #C3 Phoenix, Arizona 85051-2517 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 Fax: (602) 242-2513 In reply, refer to: AESO/SE 02E00000-2012-F-0011-R001/02EAAZ00-2020-F-0206 December 17, 2019 Mr. Neil Bosworth, Forest Supervisor Tonto National Forest Supervisor’s Office 2324 East McDowell Road Phoenix, Arizona 85006 RE: Continued Implementation of the Tonto National Forest’s Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP) for the Mexican Spotted Owl and its Designated Critical Habitat Dear Mr. Bosworth: This document transmits our biological opinion (BO) for the reinitiation of formal consultation pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. § 1531-1544), as amended (ESA or Act), for the Tonto National Forest’s (NF) Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP). The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) and Forest Service are conducting this reinitiation in response to a September 12, 2019, court order in WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4:13-CV-00151-RCC. In response to this court order, as well as updated information regarding subjects in the BO, and current regulation and policy, we are updating the Status of the Species, Environmental Baseline, Effects of the Action, Cumulative Effects, and Incidental Take Statement sections of the April 30, 2012, Tonto NF LRMP BO (02E00000-2012-F-0011). We received your updated Biological Assessment (BA) on November 23, 2019. We are consulting on effects to the threatened Mexican spotted owl (Strix occidentalis lucida) (spotted owl or owl) and its critical habitat from the Forest Services’ continued implementation of the Tonto NF’s LRMP.
    [Show full text]
  • GRAND CANYON a PORTFOLIO by JOHN BLAUSTEIN “Rollin’, Rollin’, Rollin’ on the River.” Rollin’ Rollin’, “Rollin’
    MAY 2016 MAY DEEP DOWN INSIDE FROM OUR ARCHIVE ESCAPE • EXPLORE • EXPERIENCE RIDING THE RIVER IN 1955 the inner — JOHN FOGERTY GRAND CANYON A PORTFOLIO BY JOHN BLAUSTEIN “Rollin’, rollin’, rollin’ on the river.” rollin’ rollin’, “Rollin’, plus NUDE CARVINGS BY BASQUE SHEEPHERDERS WEST CLEAR CREEK TRAIL FIRE LOOKOUT TREES JAVELINAS THE “CROOKEDEST RAILROAD IN THE WORLD” Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Grand Canyon 2 EDITOR’S LETTER 30 TRAVELING THE CANYON’S 46 OLD SCHOOL National Park WHITE WATER HIGHWAY ... Apache Elementary began as a one-room Flagstaff 3 CONTRIBUTORS adobe schoolhouse in the early 1910s. Seligman A story originally published in Arizona Jerome Although the building has been rebuilt Prescott 4 LETTERS Highways in June 1960. West Clear Creek and the technology has changed, it’s still By Katie Lee 5 THE JOURNAL a one-room schoolhouse, where Palma Alpine Hudson provides a traditional education to 2016 People, places and things from around PHOENIX May 38 UP FOR HOURS 10 students ranging from kindergarten to the state, including a look back at iconic Hours and hours alone, high above ground, eighth grade. photographer Bob Bradshaw; Grand looking into the distance ... that’s the life of By Kathy Montgomery Canyon-Parashant National Monument; a fire lookout. That is, until a fire breaks out. Photographs by Eirini Pajak Douglas and the United Verde & Pacific Railway, It’s a challenging job under challenging a line once known as the “crookedest conditions. Although most lookout tow- line in the world.” 52 SCENIC DRIVE POINTS OF INTEREST IN THIS ISSUE ers were made of steel, some were simple Williamson Valley Road: From the jagged trees with wooden platforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Opinon on Proposed Grazing on the Tonto Basin, Walnut
    United States Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arizona Ecological Services Office 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021-4951 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 FAX: (602) 242-2513 In Reply Refer To: AESO/SE 02EAAZ00-2012-F-0423 02EAAZ00-2007-I-0221 July 24, 2014 Mr. Neil Bosworth, Forest Supervisor Tonto National Forest 2324 East McDowell Road Phoenix, Arizona 85006 Dear Mr. Bosworth: Thank you for your November 19, 2013, letter requesting formal consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544), as amended (Act), received by our office November 22, 2013. At issue are impacts that may result from proposed grazing on the Tonto Basin, Walnut, and 7/K Allotments on the Tonto National Forest (TNF), Gila County, Arizona. You concluded the proposed action “may affect, is likely to adversely affect” the endangered southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) and requested initiation of formal consultation. All the information necessary to initiate formal consultation was received on March 2, 2014. Your have also concluded the proposed project “may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect” designated critical habitat for the southwestern willow flycatcher, the threatened Mexican spotted owl (Strix occidentalis lucida) and its designated critical habitat, designated critical habitat for the endangered spikedace (Meda fulgida), the proposed yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus), the proposed northern Mexican gartersnake (Thamnophis eques megalops) and its proposed critical habitat, and the proposed narrow-headed gartersnake (Thamnophis rufipunctatus) and its proposed critical habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments on the DEIS for the Tonto National Forest Travel Management Plan
    Comments on the DEIS for the Tonto National Forest Travel Management Plan Submitted September 15, 2014 via Electronic Mail and Fed Ex On Behalf of: Archaeology Southwest Center for Biological Diversity Sierra Club The Wilderness Society WildEarth Guardians Table of Contents II. Federal Regulation of Travel Management ...................................................................................... 4 III. Impacts from Year Round Motorized Use Must be Analyzed .................................................... 5 IV. The Forest Service’s Preferred Alternative .................................................................................. 6 V. Desired Conditions for Travel Management .................................................................................... 6 VI. Purpose and Need Statements ........................................................................................................ 7 VII. Baseline Determination................................................................................................................... 8 A. The Forest Service cannot arbitrarily reclassify roads as “open to motor vehicle use” in the baseline. .................................................................................................................................................. 10 B. Classification of all closed or decommissioned routes as “open to motor vehicle use” leads to mischaracterization of the impacts of the considered alternatives. ......................................................... 11 C. Failure
    [Show full text]