DOCSLIB.ORG

Tonto and Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tonto and Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests United States Environmental Assessment Department of Agriculture for Forest Service Southwestern Region Heber-Reno/Morgan Mountain Sheep Driveways Tonto and Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests Figure 1. Original sheep driveways vicinity map The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual‟s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA‟s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Printed on recycled paper – February, 2011 Contents Summary ................................................................................................................................................ v Chapter 1 – Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................... 1 Background ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Need for Action ........................................................................................................... 2 Proposed Action .............................................................................................................................. 2 Laws, Regulations and Forest Plan Consistency ............................................................................. 3 Decision Framework ....................................................................................................................... 4 Public Involvement .......................................................................................................................... 4 Issues ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 2 - Alternatives ......................................................................................................................... 5 Alternatives ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Alternative 1- No Action ........................................................................................................... 6 Alternative 2 – The Proposed Action ........................................................................................ 6 Alternative 3 – Partial Use ........................................................................................................ 8 Mitigation Measures Common to Both Action Alternatives ......................................................... 10 Mitigation by Ranger District per Annual Operating Instructions ................................................. 11 Other Related Mitigation Measures Proposed Through the Collabroative Risk Assessment by Arizona Game and Fish Department ............................................................................................. 12 Comparison of Alternatives ........................................................................................................... 13 Chapter 3 – Environmental Consequences .......................................................................................... 19 Monitoring ..................................................................................................................................... 19 Adaptive Management .................................................................................................................. 20 Rangeland ...................................................................................................................................... 22 Rangeland Existing Conditions ............................................................................................... 23 Invasive Plants ........................................................................................................................ 29 Rangeland Effects ................................................................................................................... 29 Air Quality ..................................................................................................................................... 31 Riparian Resources and Water Quality .......................................................................................... 32 Riparian and Water Quality Existing Conditions .................................................................... 32 Floodplains .............................................................................................................................. 32 Direct, Indirect, and Cumulative Effects ................................................................................ 37 Environmental Assessment for the Heber-Reno/Morgan Mountain Sheep Driveways i Social and Economic ..................................................................................................................... 40 Environmental Justice ............................................................................................................. 44 Heritage ......................................................................................................................................... 45 Contemporary American Indian Uses ..................................................................................... 51 Wildlife………………………………………………………………………………...…………50 Federally Listed Species Existing Condition…………………………..…………………….52 Federally Listed Species Effects………..……………………………………………………59 Sensitive Species Existing Condition…………………………………………………..……67 Sensitive Species Effects…………………………………………………..……………...…83 Wildlife Cumulative Effects………………………………………………..…………...…112 Chapter 4 - Consultation and Coordination ....................................................................................... 112 Chapter 5 – References ...................................................................................................................... 117 Chapter 6 – List of Preparers ............................................................................................................. 123 Appendix A -- Riparian and Water .................................................................................................... 125 Appendix B – Collaborative Risk Assessment .................................................................................. 127 Appendix C. Summary of Scoping Concerns .................................................................................... 147 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 – Original sheep driveways vicinity map…………………………………………..…. i Figure 2 -- Map of Alternative 2 (Proposed Action)…………………………………………..…8 Figure 3 – Map of Alternative 3 (Partial Use)………………………………………………..…..9 Figure 4 – Map of stray domestic sheep sitings along Heber-Reno Sheep Driveway……….….27 Figure 5 – Map showing Driveways and Bighorn sheep habitat………………………………..80 Figure 6 -- Heber-Reno Sheep Driveway Alternative 3 possible drop points, bedding grounds, watering areas, and bighorn sheep habitat within Tonto NF…………………………………….81 Figure 7 -- Heber-Reno Sheep Driveway, bedding grounds, watering areas, and bighorn sheep habitat within Tonto NF………………………………………………………………………….82 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 – Comparison of Alternatives……………………………………………………………13 Table 2 – Past and Present Activities..……………………………………………………………21 Table 3 – Reasonably Foreseeable Activities..……………………………………………………22 Table 4 – Stray domestic sheep sitings along the Heber-Reno Sheep Driveway…………….…...26 Table 5 – Summary of stream reaches on the Tonto and Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests…..34 Table 6 – Economic Impacts ……..………………………………………………………………42 Table 7 – Federally threatened, endangered, and proposed species in project area ………….......51 Table 8 – Summary of determinations for federally listed species……………………………….66 Table 9 – Sensitive species analyzed……………………………………………………………..68 ii Environmental Assessment for the Heber-Reno/Morgan Mountain Sheep Driveways Table 10 – Risk assessment by alternative…………………………………………………….….84 Table 11 – Sensitive species effects determinations………………………………………...……86 Table 12 – Management indicator species considered……………………………………………90 Table 13 – Details for MIS species considered……………………...……………………………96 Table 14 – Summary of migratory birds…………………………………..……….……………105 LIST OF TABLES IN APPENDIX A 1a. Developed waters on the Heber-Reno Sheep Driveway 2a. Streams assessed by ADEQ on the Heber-Reno Sheep Driveway 3a. Potentially eligible streams for inclusion into the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. 4a. Criteria for the Outstandingly Remarkable Values (ORVs) for Canyon Creek, Spring Creek, and Salt River Environmental Assessment for the Heber-Reno/Morgan Mountain Sheep Driveways iii Summary The Heber-Reno/Morgan Mountain sheep driveways have been used to move sheep to and from winter grazing grounds to summer pastures
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tonto National Forest Travel Management Plan
    Comments on the DEIS for the Tonto National Forest Travel Management Plan Submitted September 15, 2014 via Electronic Mail and Certified Mail #7014-0150-0001-2587-0812 On Behalf of: Archaeology Southwest Center for Biological Diversity Sierra Club The Wilderness Society WildEarth Guardians Table of Contents II. Federal Regulation of Travel Management .................................................................................. 4 III. Impacts from Year Round Motorized Use Must be Analyzed .................................................. 5 IV. The Forest Service’s Preferred Alternative .............................................................................. 6 V. Desired Conditions for Travel Management ................................................................................. 6 VI. Purpose and Need Statements ................................................................................................... 7 VII. Baseline Determination .............................................................................................................. 8 A. The Forest Service cannot arbitrarily reclassify roads as “open to motor vehicle use” in the baseline. ............................................................................................................................................ 10 B. Classification of all closed or decommissioned routes as “open to motor vehicle use” leads to mischaracterization of the impacts of the considered alternatives. ...................................................... 11 C. Failure
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona´S Public Lands
    52 OF THE STATE’S SCENIC WONDERS JANUARY 2018 ESCAPE • EXPLORE • EXPERIENCE EXPLORE ARIZONA´S PUBLIC LANDS P.S. THIS LAND IS YOUR LAND 2 EDITOR’S LETTER 16 OPEN TO THE PUBLIC 52 SCENIC DRIVE For nearly a century, Arizona Highways Agua Caliente Road: With all of the farm- 3 CONTRIBUTORS has been showcasing the scenic beauty land, stockyards and solar panels around Grand Canyon National Park of the forty-eighth state. There’s a lot of Gila Bend, it might come as a surprise 4 LETTERS Jerome ground to cover, and more than a third of that there’s a scenic drive in the area, too, Hellsgate January 2018 it is located on public lands — this land but this historic route fits the bill. Wilderness 5 THE JOURNAL is your land. It’s too much to present By Noah Austin PHOENIX People, places and things from around comprehensively, so we’ve narrowed the Photographs by Jim Marshall the state, including a restaurant in list of great outdoor places to 52 … one Gila Bend Jerome called Grapes — it’s not “another for each weekend of the year. 54 HIKE OF THE MONTH tourist trap,” the owner says; the history Edited by Robert Stieve Tucson behind Bisbee’s $2 million tunnel; and Blackett’s Ridge Trail: The payoff on this Bisbee a former cattle ranch near Tucson that hike is one of the best panoramas in the 42 ROUGH COUNTRY Santa Catalina Mountains. But getting now features luxury casitas, a nature POINTS OF INTEREST IN THIS ISSUE trail and the toy-like squeaks of Gila An Essay by Kelly Vaughn there takes some doing.
    [Show full text]
  • Janet F. Barstad Curriculum Vitae
    Janet F. Barstad Curriculum Vitae Education 1981 M.S. Botany, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 1960 B.A. History, Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont Graduate research & teaching assistantships, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona Research: Arizona State University; Salt River Project; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; USDA Forest Service. Teaching: Plant Ecology; Survey of the Plant Kingdom; Biology for Majors; Plant Morphology. Master’s Thesis: Factors controlling plant distribution in a riparian deciduous forest in southeastern Arizona. Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, 1981. Educational Affiliations 2006 - Adjunct Faculty Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies (ACMRS) Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona Employment 2004-present Chronognostic Research Foundation, Inc. (nonprofit corporation) founder and president; www.chronognostic.org 2000-2004 Bureau of Census, U.S. Department of Commerce Census 2000 crew leader; Survey of Construction field representative 1986-present Arizona Highways Magazine, Phoenix, Arizona contributor: writing and photography 1984-present Freelance writing, photography, graphic arts, botany&ecology Founded Prose & Images (sole proprietorship) 1982-1984 Desert Botanical Garden, Phoenix, Arizona publications director 1977-1981 Rocky Mountain Forest & Range Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, Arizona State University biologic aide, biologic technician Janet F. Barstad 2 1976-1981 Division of Agriculture (Natural Resources) and Department of Botany & Microbiology Arizona
    [Show full text]
  • GRAND CANYON a PORTFOLIO by JOHN BLAUSTEIN “Rollin’, Rollin’, Rollin’ on the River.” Rollin’ Rollin’, “Rollin’
    MAY 2016 MAY DEEP DOWN INSIDE FROM OUR ARCHIVE ESCAPE • EXPLORE • EXPERIENCE RIDING THE RIVER IN 1955 the inner — JOHN FOGERTY GRAND CANYON A PORTFOLIO BY JOHN BLAUSTEIN “Rollin’, rollin’, rollin’ on the river.” rollin’ rollin’, “Rollin’, plus NUDE CARVINGS BY BASQUE SHEEPHERDERS WEST CLEAR CREEK TRAIL FIRE LOOKOUT TREES JAVELINAS THE “CROOKEDEST RAILROAD IN THE WORLD” Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Grand Canyon 2 EDITOR’S LETTER 30 TRAVELING THE CANYON’S 46 OLD SCHOOL National Park WHITE WATER HIGHWAY ... Apache Elementary began as a one-room Flagstaff 3 CONTRIBUTORS adobe schoolhouse in the early 1910s. Seligman A story originally published in Arizona Jerome Although the building has been rebuilt Prescott 4 LETTERS Highways in June 1960. West Clear Creek and the technology has changed, it’s still By Katie Lee 5 THE JOURNAL a one-room schoolhouse, where Palma Alpine Hudson provides a traditional education to 2016 People, places and things from around PHOENIX May 38 UP FOR HOURS 10 students ranging from kindergarten to the state, including a look back at iconic Hours and hours alone, high above ground, eighth grade. photographer Bob Bradshaw; Grand looking into the distance ... that’s the life of By Kathy Montgomery Canyon-Parashant National Monument; a fire lookout. That is, until a fire breaks out. Photographs by Eirini Pajak Douglas and the United Verde & Pacific Railway, It’s a challenging job under challenging a line once known as the “crookedest conditions. Although most lookout tow- line in the world.” 52 SCENIC DRIVE POINTS OF INTEREST IN THIS ISSUE ers were made of steel, some were simple Williamson Valley Road: From the jagged trees with wooden platforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments on the DEIS for the Tonto National Forest Travel Management Plan
    Comments on the DEIS for the Tonto National Forest Travel Management Plan Submitted September 15, 2014 via Electronic Mail and Fed Ex On Behalf of: Archaeology Southwest Center for Biological Diversity Sierra Club The Wilderness Society WildEarth Guardians Table of Contents II. Federal Regulation of Travel Management ...................................................................................... 4 III. Impacts from Year Round Motorized Use Must be Analyzed .................................................... 5 IV. The Forest Service’s Preferred Alternative .................................................................................. 6 V. Desired Conditions for Travel Management .................................................................................... 6 VI. Purpose and Need Statements ........................................................................................................ 7 VII. Baseline Determination................................................................................................................... 8 A. The Forest Service cannot arbitrarily reclassify roads as “open to motor vehicle use” in the baseline. .................................................................................................................................................. 10 B. Classification of all closed or decommissioned routes as “open to motor vehicle use” leads to mischaracterization of the impacts of the considered alternatives. ......................................................... 11 C. Failure
    [Show full text]
  • Final Assessment Report of Social and Economic Conditions, Trends, and Risks to Sustainability Volume II
    United States Department of Agriculture Final Assessment Report of Social and Economic Conditions, Trends, and Risks to Sustainability Volume II Tonto National Forest, Arizona Forest Service Tonto National Forest March 2017 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD- 3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992.
    [Show full text]
  • Tonto National Forest Draft Wild & Scenic Rivers Eligibility Study
    United States Department of Agriculture Tonto National Forest Draft Wild and Scenic Rivers Eligibility Study Tonto National Forest Gila, Maricopa, Pinal, and Yavapai Counties Arizona Forest Service Tonto National Forest October 2017 Introduction The National Wild & Scenic Rivers (WSR) System was created by Congress in 1968 to preserve rivers that contain outstanding natural, cultural, and recreational values in a free-flowing system, and are for the enjoyment of present and future generations. Over the past thirty years several wild and scenic rivers eligibility studies were conducted on rivers and river segments on the Tonto National Forest. Those studies include the 1984 Arizona Wilderness Act, a Resource Information Report for Potential Wild, Scenic, Recreational River Designations, National Forest of Arizona (1993), and the Fossil Creek Resource Assessment (2009). As a result of this earlier work the Tonto National Forest identified 26 river segments as eligible for wild and scenic rivers designation. Determinations for eligibility were made using the process outlined in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System Act of 1968. The results of these studies were adopted as amendments to the 1985 Tonto National Forest plan. As part of the Tonto National Forest Plan Revision process, under the direction of the 2012 Planning Rule (36 CFR Part 219), a new wild and scenic rivers eligibility study was conducted for the Tonto National Forest (TNF) planning area. When beginning this process, the interdisciplinary (ID) team reviewed the earlier work from the 1993 effort and determined that an additional, more comprehensive study was required to fulfill the mandates set forth in the 2012 Planning Rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying and Preserving Historic Bridges
    Bridges Within the National Forest System— A Historic Context Creation of the National Forests changed yet again. From this time forward, the (1891 to 1905) management of America’s forest reserves (soon to be renamed national forests) would rest with the USDA he public lands currently managed as national Forest Service (Runte 1991). T forests are the result of ideas germinated in the mid- and late 19th century. During this period, the government The Early Years (1905 to 1933) sold and gave away millions of acres of land in an effort to promote settlement of the Western United States. As Providing access to forest resources required a system thousands of acres were cleared to make way for of roads and bridges capable of taking man and machine railroads and the settlers that followed, the idea that to the peripheries of the forests and beyond. In addition, natural resources were not inexhaustible began to forest rangers needed trails to reach the interior depths germinate. The seeds of this concept can be found in a of forests. Prior to 1905, engineers were pressed into book entitled Man and Nature, published in 1864. The service primarily as mapmakers and surveyors, using author, George Perkins Marsh, spoke directly about the transit and chain to establish forest boundaries. An early issue of exploiting and overusing America’s natural pioneer in the engineering field was F.G. Plummer, who resources and extolled the philosophy of “responsible transferred to the Department of Agriculture from the stewardship” of public lands (Dussol 1996). Marsh’s U.S. Geological Survey in 1905.
    [Show full text]
  • Tonto National Forest Draft Wild and Scenic Rivers Eligibility Study
    United States Department of Agriculture Tonto National Forest Draft Wild and Scenic Rivers Eligibility Study Tonto National Forest Gila, Maricopa, Pinal, and Yavapai Counties Arizona Forest Service Tonto National Forest October 2017 Introduction The National Wild & Scenic Rivers (WSR) System was created by Congress in 1968 to preserve rivers that contain outstanding natural, cultural, and recreational values in a free-flowing system, and are for the enjoyment of present and future generations. Over the past thirty years several wild and scenic rivers eligibility studies were conducted on rivers and river segments on the Tonto National Forest. Those studies include the 1984 Arizona Wilderness Act, a Resource Information Report for Potential Wild, Scenic, Recreational River Designations, National Forest of Arizona (1993), and the Fossil Creek Resource Assessment (2009). As a result of this earlier work the Tonto National Forest identified 26 river segments as eligible for wild and scenic rivers designation. Determinations for eligibility were made using the process outlined in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System Act of 1968. The results of these studies were adopted as amendments to the 1985 Tonto National Forest plan. As part of the Tonto National Forest Plan Revision process, under the direction of the 2012 Planning Rule (36 CFR Part 219), a new wild and scenic rivers eligibility study was conducted for the Tonto National Forest (TNF) planning area. When beginning this process, the interdisciplinary (ID) team reviewed the earlier work from the 1993 effort and determined that an additional, more comprehensive study was required to fulfill the mandates set forth in the 2012 Planning Rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Location of Legal Description Courthouse
    Form No. 10-306 (Rev. 10-74) UNITEDSTATESDEPARTMENTOFTHE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM FOR FEDERAL PROPERTIES SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOWTO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS .__________TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS______ I NAME HISTORIC AND/OR COMMON Verde River Sheep Bridge HLOCATION 0 ' rf ^ CUc^A, -U $ ''- / -C^-^JJ /<X«X*^ STREET & NUMBER Sec. 35, T.9N. , R.6E., G&SKB&M —NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Nearest town: Carefree 2L. VICINITY OF 3 STATE COUNTY CODE Arizona sr Yavapai 025 CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE " _DISTRICT PUBLIC _OCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM — BUILDING(S) —PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL —PARK ^.STRUCTURE —BOTH _WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS _YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED ?_YES. UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL -TRANSPORTATION _ NO —MILITARY —OTHER AGENCY U.S.REGIONAL Forest HEADQUARTERS Service, (11 applica&el U.S.D.A*, Region STREET & NUMBER Federal Building, 6th Floor, £1 7 Ave., S¥ CITY. TOWN STATE Albuquerque VICINITY OF New Mexico LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REG.STRYOFDEEDS.ETC. STREET & NUMBER 102 S. 28th Street, P.O. Box 13705 CITY. TOWN STATE Phoenix Arizona REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE N/A DATE —FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY, TOWN STATE DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE -EXCELLENT -DETERIORATED -UNALTERED X ORIGINAL SITE -GOOD -RUINS FALTERED _MOVED DATE_____ -FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE This is a suspension bridge, using 1^g inch wire rope for suspension lines. The bridge is Ii8? feet long, l£> inches wide, and has sides 36 inches high.
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Management on the Tonto National Forest FEIS
    United States Department of Agriculture Travel Management on the Tonto National Forest Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume II–Response to Comments Tonto Publ. No MB-R3-12-04 Forest Service National Forest June 2016 1 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Evaluation Rationale May 2018
    Tonto National Forest- Wilderness Evaluation Rationale 4-Unique Features a. Does the area contain rare plant or animal 5-Manageability communities or rare ecosystems? Consider: b. Are there any outstanding landscape features a. Shape and configuration, cherry stemming, such as waterfalls, mountains, viewpoints, boundary etc. 1-Apparent Naturalness 2-Solitude or Primitive and Unconfined Recreation waterbodies, or geologic features? b. Presence and extent of legally established uses or 1a. What is the composition of plant and animal communities? 2a. Consider impacts that are pervasive and influence a c. Are there historic and cultural resources sites rights (mining, special uses, traditional uses) 1b. What is the extent to which the area appears to reflect ecological conditions visitor's opportunity for solitude within the evaluated area. in the area of regional or national significance? c. Adjacent land management or signed decisions that would normally be associated with the area without human intervention? 2b. Consider the opportunity to engage in primitive type or d. Are there any research natural areas (RNA's)? d. Percent Roadless area 1c. What is the extent to which improvements included in the area represent a Characteristics unconfined recreation activities that lead to a visitor's ability Characteristics e. Are there any high quality water resources or e. Prevalence of non-primitive recreation activities Polygon District Preliminary Overall Rating Acres departure from apparent naturalness? Rating to feel a part of nature. Rating 3-Size important watershed features? f. Any other pertinent information Characteristics Rating a. In most areas the composition of plant and animal communities appears natural to the average forest visitor.
    [Show full text]