DOCSLIB.ORG

Camp Verde and Wet Beaver Creek; Vicinity of Lake Montezuma, Yavapai County, Arizona

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Camp Verde and Wet Beaver Creek; Vicinity of Lake Montezuma, Yavapai County, Arizona ACOE. 1976. Flood Plain Information: Camp Verde and Wet Beaver Creek; Vicinity of Lake Montezuma, Yavapai County, Arizona. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles. 27 pages. RIPARIAN; VERDE RIVER. Agenbroad, L. D., et al. 1981. Investigations of small, man-made impoundments on the hydrology of the lower Oak Creek drainage area, Coconino and Yavapai counties, Arizona. Northern Arizona University, Department of Geology, 67 pages. TD395 .A26. HYDROLOGY; VERDE RIVER. Ahlstrom, R. V. N., et al. 1995. Environmental and chronological factors in the Mesa Verde-Northern Rio Grande migration. CC97 .E85 J68 14: 125. BIOTIC CHANGE; MESA VERDE NATIONAL PARK. Anderson, T. W. 1995. Summary of the southwest alluvial basins, regional aquifer- system analysis, south-central Arizona and parts of adjacent states. U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 1406-A. 33 pages. GROUNDWATER; SALT RIVER; VERDE RIVER. study all south of Flagstaff. Anonymous. Trend analysis of selected water quality constituents in the Verde River basin, central Arizona. UA, Government Documents: I19; 42/4; 90-4128. VERDE RIVER; WATER QUALITY. Anonymous. 1942. Pioneering in the Verde valley. Scenic Southwest: 3. AGRICULTURE; LIVESTOCK; VERDE RIVER. Anonymous. 1954. Pioneer stories of Arizona's Verde valley. Verde Valley Pioneers Association, Camp Verde, AZ. 219 pages. AGRICULTURE; HISTORY; LIVESTOCK; VERDE RIVER. Anonymous. 1970. The taming of the Salt. Salt River Project Communications and Public Affairs Department, Phoenix. HISTORY; SALT RIVER; VERDE RIVER. A collection of biographies of pioneers who contributed significantly to water development in the Salt River Valley. Anonymous. 1973. Flood damage report on the storm and flood of 17-21 October 1972 - Gila River basin above San Carlos. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles. AGUA FRIA RIVER; COLORADO RIVER; FLOOD; GILA RIVER; LITTLE COLORADO RIVER; SALT RIVER; SAN PEDRO RIVER; SANTA CRUZ RIVER; VERDE RIVER. Anonymous. 1979. Action program for resolution of livestock-riparian conflicts on the Salt River and Verde River. USFS, Region 3, Tonto, Prescott, and Coconino National Forests, 129 pages. LIVESTOCK; RIPARIAN; SALT RIVER; VERDE RIVER. Anonymous. 1981. River otter reintroduction planned for Verde. Wildl View (SK51 .W58): 4. OTTER; RESTORE; VERDE RIVER. Arizona Rivers Coalition. 1991. Arizona rivers: lifeblood of the desert. Arizona Rivers Coalition, Phoenix. 197 pages. VERDE RIVER; WILD AND SCENIC. Averitt, E., et al. 1994. An assessment of the Verde River corridor project in Arizona. Land Urb Plan (NIC; ASU QH75 .A1 L262x) 28: 161-178. VERDE RIVER. Baker, M. B., Jr. 1982. Hydrologic regimes of forested areas in the Beaver Creek watershed. USFS, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ft. Collins. General Technical Report RM-90. US Docs A 13.88:RM-90. HYDROLOGY; VERDE RIVER. Juniperus osteosperma. Site located between Happy Jack and Verde River. Inherently low water yield in Utah juniper sites limits any increases from vegetative manipulations. Baker, V. R. 1987. Fluvial paleohydrology of the southern Colorado Plateau, Arizona and Utah. Pages 18-19 in R.H. Hawkins, F.J. Wobber, and E.P. Springer, eds. Remote sensing-arid lands workshop. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Research, Washington, D.C. COLORADO PLATEAU; ESCALANTE RIVER; HYDROLOGY; KANAB CREEK; PALEOHYDROLOGY; SALT RIVER; VERDE RIVER. Baldys, S., III. 1990. Trend analysis of selected water-quality constituents in the Verde River basin, central Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report 90-4128. 59 pages. VERDE RIVER; WATER QUALITY. Baldys, S., III, and J. A. Bayles. 1990. Flow characteristics of streams that drain the Fort Apache and San Carlos Indian Reservations, east-central Arizona, 1930-86. U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report 90-4053. 59 pages. HYDROLOGY; VERDE RIVER. Baldys, S., III, and H. W. Hjalmarson. 1994. Effects of controlled burning of chaparral on streamflow and sediment characteristics, East Fork Sycamore Creek, central Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report 93-4102. 33 pages. FIRE; HYDROLOGY; VERDE RIVER; WATER QUALITY. Barrett, P. J., and O. E. Maughan. 1995. Spatial habitat selection of roundtail chub (Gila robusta) in two central Arizona streams. SW Nat (QH1 .S745) 40: 301-307. (RJ). GILA ROBUSTA; VERDE RIVER; XYRAUCHEN TEXANUS. Wet Beaver and Fossil creeks of the Verde River. Barstad, J. 1988. The Verde River sheep bridge and the sheep industry in Arizona. Gerald A. Doyle and Associates, P.C., Phoenix. LIVESTOCK; VERDE RIVER. Bartlett, K. 1942. Notes upon the routes of Espejo and Farfan to the mines in the 16th century. F791 .N65 17: 21-36. LITTLE COLORADO RIVER; MINING; VERDE RIVER. Bell, W. A. 1869. New tracks in North America. Chapman and Hall, London. 564 pages. COLORADO RIVER; GILA RIVER; HISTORY; SALT RIVER; SAN SIMON CREEK; SANTA CRUZ RIVER; VERDE RIVER. BLM. 1959. The public land records. Bureau of Land Management, Washington, D.C. Footnotes to American history HISTORY; VERDE RIVER. Bond, M. E., and R. H. Dunikoski. 1977. Impact of second-home development on water availability in north central Arizona. Arizona State University Bureau of Business and Economic Research, Tempe. DEVELOPMENT; GROUNDWATER; SALT RIVER; VERDE RIVER. Boner, F. C., et al. 1992. Water-resources data for Arizona, water year 1991. U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Resources Data Report AZ-91-1. 411 pages. COLORADO RIVER; GROUNDWATER; HYDROLOGY; LITTLE COLORADO RIVER; VERDE RIVER. Boner, F. C., et al. 1991. Water resources data, Arizona, water year 1990. U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Data Report AZ-90-1. 381 pages. COLORADO RIVER; GROUNDWATER; HYDROLOGY; LITTLE COLORADO RIVER; VERDE RIVER. Bonomo, T. 1996. Public involvement and consensus building in the Verde River watershed in central Arizona. Pages 230-236 in D.W. Shaw and D.M. Finch, eds. Desired future conditions for southwestern riparian ecosystems: bring interests and concerns together. USFS Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins. General Technical Report RM-272. COMMUNITY-BASED CONSERVATION; DECISION-MAKING; VERDE RIVER. Bronson, L. G. 1978. Cowmen on the Verde. J AZ Hist (SC: F 806 .A762) 19: 261-282. LIVESTOCK; VERDE RIVER. Brown, J. G., and D. R. Pool. 1989. Hydrogeology of the western part of the Salt River valley, Maricopa County, Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report 88-4202. HYDROLOGY; SALT RIVER; VERDE RIVER. Brown, T. C., and M. M. Fogel. 1987. Use of streamflow increases from vegetation management in the Verde River basin. Water Res Bull (GB651 .W315) (v.1-17 in stacks, others on fiche) 23: 1149. VERDE RIVER. Byrkit, J. W. 1978. A log of the Verde: the taming of an Arizona river. J AZ Hist (SC: F 806 .A762) 19: 31-54. COLORADO PLATEAU; DAM; VERDE RIVER. Caillou, A. 1990. Jerome and the Verde Valley: legends and legacies. Thorne Enterprises, Sedona, AZ. 278 pages. LIVESTOCK; MINING; VERDE RIVER; YAVAPAI. Campbell, C. J., and W. Green. 1968. Perpetual succession of stream-channel vegetation in a semiarid region. Q11 .A72 A23 5: 86-97. COLORADO RIVER; ELEAGANUS; PECOS RIVER; RIO GRANDE RIVER; RIPARIAN; SALT RIVER; TAMARIX; VERDE RIVER. Chamberlain, S. A. 1975. Fort McDowell Indian Reservation: Water Rights and Indian Removal, 1910-1930. F591 .J65 14: 27-34. APACHE; VERDE RIVER. Christensen, K. M. 1984. Habitat selection, food habitas, movements and activity patterns of reintroduced river otters (Lutra canadensis) in central Arizona. Thesis, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, OTTER; VERDE RIVER. Coalition, Arizona Rivers. 1993. Arizona rivers, lifeblood of the desert : a citizens proposal for the protection of rivers in Arizona. 119 pages. SC: GB1224.A6 A75 1993. COLORADO RIVER; GILA RIVER; SALT RIVER; VERDE RIVER. Creef, E. D., and R. W. Clarkson. 1992. Movement patterns and habitat use of razorback suckers (Xyrauchen texanus) in the Verde River, Arizona. Pages 63. Proceedings of the Desert Fishes Council. XXIV. VERDE RIVER; XYRAUCHEN TEXANUS. Davis, Owen K. 1987. Palynological evidence for historic juniper invasion in central Arizona: a late Quaternary perspective. Pages 120-124 in R. Everett, ed. Pinyon-juniper conference. USFS, Intermountain Research Station, Logan, UT. General Technical Report INT-215. HISTORY; PINYON-JUNIPER. Pollen records from the Verde Valley show woodland expansion coincides with introduction of livestock. Pinyon & sagebrush declined while juniper increased. Duncan, F. L. 1990. Long Mesa fire 1989. Fire effects and cultural resources: an annotated bibliography. On file at Mesa Verde National Park Research Center. BIBLIOGRAPHY; CULTURAL RESOURCE; DOUGLAS FIR; FIRE; MESA VERDE NATIONAL PARK; PINYON-JUNIPER. Eason, N. J. 1966. Fort Verde: An Era of Men and Courage. Fort Verde Museum Society, Camp Verde, AZ. HISTORY; VERDE RIVER. Ely, L. L., and V. R. Baker. 1985. Reconstructing paleoflood hydrology with slackwater deposits: Verde River, Arizona. Phys Geogr (G1 .P48) 6: 103-126. FLOOD; PALEOHYDROLOGY; VERDE RIVER. Ely, L. L., et al. 1993. A 5000-year record of extreme floods and climate change in the southwestern United States. Science (Q1 .S35) 262: 410-412. BILL WILLIAMS RIVER; BIOTIC CHANGE; CLIMATE; ESCALANTE RIVER; FLOOD; HYDROLOGY; PALEOHYDROLOGY; PARIA RIVER; SALT RIVER; SAN PEDRO RIVER; VERDE RIVER; VIRGIN RIVER WATERSHED. Erdman, J. A. 1970. Pinyon-juniper succession after natural fires on residual soils of Mesa Verde, Colorado. BYU Sci Bull, Biol Ser (CSEL: QH1 .B863) 11 (2): 1-26.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CENTRAL ARIZONA SALINITY STUDY --- PHASE I Technical Appendix C HYDROLOGIC REPORT on the PHOENIX
    CENTRAL ARIZONA SALINITY STUDY --- PHASE I Technical Appendix C HYDROLOGIC REPORT ON THE PHOENIX AMA Prepared for: United States Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation Prepared by: Brown and Caldwell 201 East Washington Street, Suite 500 Phoenix, Arizona 85004 Brown and Caldwell Project No. 23481.001 C-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ 2 LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................... 3 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 4 2.0 PHYSICAL SETTING ....................................................................................................... 5 3.0 GENERALIZED GEOLOGY ............................................................................................ 6 3.1 BEDROCK GEOLOGY ......................................................................................... 6 3.2 BASIN GEOLOGY ................................................................................................ 6 4.0 HYDROGEOLOGIC CONDITIONS ................................................................................ 9 4.1 GROUNDWATER OCCURRENCE ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tonto National Forest Travel Management Plan
    Comments on the DEIS for the Tonto National Forest Travel Management Plan Submitted September 15, 2014 via Electronic Mail and Certified Mail #7014-0150-0001-2587-0812 On Behalf of: Archaeology Southwest Center for Biological Diversity Sierra Club The Wilderness Society WildEarth Guardians Table of Contents II. Federal Regulation of Travel Management .................................................................................. 4 III. Impacts from Year Round Motorized Use Must be Analyzed .................................................. 5 IV. The Forest Service’s Preferred Alternative .............................................................................. 6 V. Desired Conditions for Travel Management ................................................................................. 6 VI. Purpose and Need Statements ................................................................................................... 7 VII. Baseline Determination .............................................................................................................. 8 A. The Forest Service cannot arbitrarily reclassify roads as “open to motor vehicle use” in the baseline. ............................................................................................................................................ 10 B. Classification of all closed or decommissioned routes as “open to motor vehicle use” leads to mischaracterization of the impacts of the considered alternatives. ...................................................... 11 C. Failure
    [Show full text]
  • Hassayampa Landscape Restoration EA Aquatics Resources Report
    Hassayampa Landscape Restoration Environmental Assessment Aquatics Resources Report Prepared by: Albert Sillas Fishery Biologist Prescott National Forest for: Bradshaw Ranger District Prescott National Forest August 25, 2017 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Survey Ik Salt River Valley, Arizona
    Soil Survey in Salt River Valley Item Type text; Book Authors Means, Thos. H. Publisher College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Rights Public Domain: This material has been identified as being free of known restrictions under U.S. copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. Download date 28/09/2021 11:06:51 Item License http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/192405 U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, DIVISION OF SOILS MILTON "WHITNEY, Chief SOIL SURVEY IK SALT RIVER VALLEY, ARIZONA. THOMAS H MEANS [REPRINTED *ROM THE EFFORT o\ FIIID OPLK\.HO\S os mt I)IM^ION ot i OK 1900 ] CONTENTS. Page. Introduction _ to 287 Geology and topography _ 288 Climate 291 Soils 293 Pecos sand 294 River wash 293 Salt Eiver gravel 293 G-ilafine sandy loam 296 Salt River adobe 296 G-lendale loess „__ 299 Colluvial soils, or mountain waste - 302 Maricopa gravelly loam 303 Maricopa sandy loam _ 304 Maricopaloam 306 Maricopa clay lo?-m „ 307 Hardpan _ 308 Solrnaps - - 308 Tempesheet , 308 Phoenix sheet 309 Buckeye sheet 309 Irrigation waters 310 Underground waters 31S Tempesheet „ , 314 Phoenix sheet 315 Buckeye sheet , 317 Alkali of the soils 319 Templesheet 319 Origin of alkali salts of Tempe sheet 321 Reclamation of alkali lands 323 Phoenix &heet - - 325 Buckeye sheet-, S38 Agriculture in Salt River Valley 331 Fruit farming 331 Cattle raising - 33S Dairying * — - %8& in ILLUSTRATIONS. PLATES. PLATE XXIV. Character of native vegetation on desert land near the moun- tains 290 XXY. Irrigated lands in Tempe area 302 XXVI.
    [Show full text]
  • Gila Topminnow Revised Recovery Plan December 1998
    GILA TOPMINNOW, Poeciliopsis occidentalis occidentalis, REVISED RECOVERY PLAN (Original Approval: March 15, 1984) Prepared by David A. Weedman Arizona Game and Fish Department Phoenix, Arizona for Region 2 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, New Mexico December 1998 Approved: Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Date: Gila Topminnow Revised Recovery Plan December 1998 DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions required to recover and protect the species. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) prepares the plans, sometimes with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State and Federal Agencies, and others. Objectives are attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Time and costs provided for individual tasks are estimates only, and not to be taken as actual or budgeted expenditures. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor official positions or approval of any persons or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the Service. They represent the official position of the Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director or Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. ii Gila Topminnow Revised Recovery Plan December 1998 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Original preparation of the revised Gila topminnow Recovery Plan (1994) was done by Francisco J. Abarca 1, Brian E. Bagley, Dean A. Hendrickson 1 and Jeffrey R. Simms 1. That document was modified to this current version and the work conducted by those individuals is greatly appreciated and now acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2019 to 09/30/2019 Prescott National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2019 to 09/30/2019 Prescott National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact R3 - Southwestern Region, Occurring in more than one Forest (excluding Regionwide) AZ Public Service (APS) ROW - Vegetation management Completed Actual: 04/09/2019 04/2019 Heather Snow Vegetation Management with (other than forest products) 505-842-3445 Herbicides - Special use management [email protected] EA Description: FS must decide whether to allow APS to include using herbicides as a method to manage vegetation on existing *UPDATED* APS transmission ROW within five National Forests in Arizona. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=45771 Location: UNIT - Kaibab National Forest All Units, Prescott National Forest All Units, Coconino National Forest All Units, Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests All Units, Tonto National Forest All Units. STATE - Arizona. COUNTY - Coconino, Gila, Maricopa, Navajo, Yavapai. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Arizona Public Service Company Rights of Way across the Apache-Sitgreaves, Coconino, Kaibab, Prescott, and Tonto National Forests. See map on website. Prescott College Academic - Recreation management In Progress: Expected:04/2018 05/2018 Julie Rowe Outfitter and Guide Priority Use - Special use management Scoping Start 02/02/2015 928-203-7516 (2015-2025) [email protected] CE Description: The Forest Service proposes to authorize Prescott College to conduct academic courses including new student orientation, adventure education, biology, human ecology, natural history, physical geography, field ecology, environmental conservation Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=47407 Location: UNIT - Coronado National Forest All Units, Kaibab National Forest All Units, Prescott National Forest All Units, Tonto Basin Ranger District, Coconino National Forest All Units, Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests All Units.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment
    United States Department of Agriculture Supplemental Forest Service Southwestern Environmental Region April 2020 Assessment Proposed Riverbend Placer Mine and Lost Nugget Reclamation Project Bradshaw Ranger District Prescott National Forest In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Fish Restoration in Redrock Canyon
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Final Environmental Assessment Phoenix Area Office NATIVE FISH RESTORATION IN REDROCK CANYON U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southwestern Region Coronado National Forest Santa Cruz County, Arizona June 2008 Bureau of Reclamation Finding of No Significant Impact U.S. Forest Service Finding of No Significant Impact Decision Notice INTRODUCTION In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (Public Law 91-190, as amended), the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), as the lead Federal agency, and the Forest Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and Arizona Game and Fish Department (AGFD), as cooperating agencies, have issued the attached final environmental assessment (EA) to disclose the potential environmental impacts resulting from construction of a fish barrier, removal of nonnative fishes with the piscicide antimycin A and/or rotenone, and restoration of native fishes and amphibians in Redrock Canyon on the Coronado National Forest (CNF). The Proposed Action is intended to improve the recovery status of federally listed fish and amphibians (Gila chub, Gila topminnow, Chiricahua leopard frog, and Sonora tiger salamander) and maintain a healthy native fishery in Redrock Canyon consistent with the CNF Plan and ongoing Endangered Species Act (ESA), Section 7(a)(2), consultation between Reclamation and the FWS. BACKGROUND The Proposed Action is part of a larger program being implemented by Reclamation to construct a series of fish barriers within the Gila River Basin to prevent the invasion of nonnative fishes into high-priority streams occupied by imperiled native fishes. This program is mandated by a FWS biological opinion on impacts of Central Arizona Project (CAP) water transfers to the Gila River Basin (FWS 2008a).
    [Show full text]
  • A Regional Groundwater Flow Model of the Salt River Valley - Phase I
    SDMS DOCID#1142207 ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES A REGIONAL GROUNDWATER FLOW MODEL OF THE SALT RIVER VALLEY - PHASE I PBOEN~ AC~ MANAGEMENT AREA HYDROGEOLOGIC FRAMEWORK AND BASIC DATA REPORT BY EDWIN F. CORKHILL, STEVE CORELL, BRADLEY M. HILL. and DAVID A. CARR HYDROLOGY DIVISION MODELING REPORT NO. 6 Phoenix, Arizona April, 1993 ARIZO~A DEPARTMENT OF \'1ATER RESOURCES A REGIONAL GROUND\VATER FLOW MODEL OF THE SALT RIVER VALLEY ~ PHASE I PHOENIX ACTIVE MANAGEMENT AREA HYDROGEOLOGIC FRAMEWORK AND BASIC DATA REPORT Final Report by Edwin Corkhilt Steve CorelL Bradley M. HilL and David A. Modeling Report No. 6 Hydrology Division - Groundwater Modeling April 1, 1 Abstract The Phoenix Active :Management Area groundwater flow model focuses on the hydrologic system of the Salt River Valley, the most intensive water use area of the state. The goal of the hydrologic study and modeling effort was to develop a quantitative tool to test various groundwater management scenarios. The predevelopment hydrologic system (circa 1900) of the Salt River Valley is analyzed. Various components of groundwater inflow and outflov,/ are identified. A predevelopment groundviater budget is presented. The total inflows and outflows were in approximate balance and equaled approximately 139J~OO acre-feet per year. The modern hydrologic system (1978-198:-1) is analyzed. The vari.ous components of groundv,:rner inflow and outflov<' are identified. Detailed descriptions of the methodologies used to analyze the components of flow are provided. A groundwater budget for the period 19/X-1 Y88 is presented. The total inflows were approximately 13.5 million acre-feet and the total outflow-, were approximately 14.0 million acre-feet The estimated decrease in the volume of groundwater in storage \\'US 0.5 rnillion acre-feet Various recommendations are provided to improve future data collection and analysis efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Historic Bridge Inventory
    STATE OF ARIZONA HISTORIC PROMINVENTORY FORM Granite Creek Bridge mumy YaTapcd inventorynurh OW42 milwst 318.13 invmtory rout. SR 88 A Iocabn 0.3 rnl E Id SR 89 Came imsdMte Creek cityhriciniv Preston USGS quadrangle hot! district 85 Ul'M referem 12.370057.3831113 STRUCTURAL INFORMATION main span number 2 main span type 104 appr, span number 0 appr. vantype degrea of skew 0 guardrail type 6 main span lhgth 43.0 tuperstructve concrete three-beamdeck girder structure length 89.0 sbstrmture concrete abutmenb, wlngwalls and pier roadway width 20.1 floarldeddng concrete deck swumrre width 23.8 othn fuWr ateel TMebeam guard& HISTORICAL INFORMATION eonmuetlondete 1922 desIgnsr/snginw Adzona Highway Dement projes number FAP 19 buildn1eon~actw Windsor, Coleman & Khg information wwce ADCYT Mge records structure owner Arizona Department of Tmnsportatlon altnakn datds) m1980 ahations steel Thrie beam guardrails lnstcrlled NATIOW REGISTER NUATION For additional informakn, sw "Vehicular Bridges in Nina1880-1964" Nebnal Reglrthr Multiple Property Dosumentation Form inventory rmre 61 NRW eligibility ebglble NRH crltsris A- 0- Cx signtf, statement excellent example of early state standard brldge hpe FORM COMRElED BY Clayton B. hr,Prindpal FRASERdeeign 420 South County Road 23E Loveland, Colorado 80537 31 October MXl4 642 FRASERDESIGN GRANITE CREEK BRIDGE ~lruclvoNa w d.t. d phota: November 20G2 visw &&en north northwest +t~N: 02.1 1.263 02.11.264 FRASERDESIGN GRANITE CREEK BRIDGE CONSTRUCTON HISTORY In 1920 the Arizona Highway Department undertook an improvement of the highway linking Prescott and Jerome. AHD designated this construction as Federal Aid Project 19, to be jointly funded by the state and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Bridges in Arizona and Their Engineers
    Historic Bridges in Arizona and Their Engineers November 3, 2011 NACE / AACE Conference Presented by: Jerry A. Cannon, PE, SE Patricia D. Morris Who Designed Arizona Bridges Mill Ave Construction Site 1928 – Photo Hoffman Collection - (Mary Lou Vaughan) Mexican American War 1848 Treaty of Hidalgo & Guadalupe Gadsden Purchase 1853 – Southern Part of AZ Northern Boundary of AZ along 37th Parallel Separated from New Mexico by 1863 Federal Organic Act Arizona Territory 1863 1846 – Cooke’s Wagon Road (Ocean to Ocean Highway US 80) Was the southern route crossing the Colorado River in Yuma Built by Capt Cooke and the Mormon Brigade during the war with Mexico. Largely paralleled the Gila River Arizona Territory Two Major Transportation Routes 1859 – Beale’s Road (Old Trails Highway and US 66) Was the northern route that crossed the Colorado River at Topock. Route was built before the construction of the railroad in 1883 Road maintenance was performed by travelers Bridges were non existent Arizona Territory Two Major Transportation Routes Alchesay Canyon Bridge (1905) Solomonville Road Overpass (1907) Lowell Arch Bridge (1911) Cameron Bridge (1911) Only Remaining Bridges from the Arizona Territory (1863-1912) Arizona’s Historic Bridges J.B. Girand 1909 - 1912 Arizona’s First and Only Territorial Engineer Florence Bridge Replacement; Lowell Bridge US80, Ash Ave. Bridge Over Salt River in Tempe Lamar Cobb 1912 Arizona’s First State Highway Engineer Antelope Hill Bridge – Yuma and Aqua Fria River Bridge Daniel Luten 1914 Canyon Padre Bridge – Canyon
    [Show full text]
  • Bufo Microscaphus) in Arizona
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 53 Number 4 Article 12 12-28-1993 Distribution of the southwestern toad (Bufo microscaphus) in Arizona Brian K. Sullivan Arizona State University West, Phoenix, Arizona Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Sullivan, Brian K. (1993) "Distribution of the southwestern toad (Bufo microscaphus) in Arizona," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 53 : No. 4 , Article 12. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol53/iss4/12 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Great Basin Naturalist 53(4), pp. 402-406 DISTRIBUTION OF THE SOUTHWESTERN TOAD (BUFO MICROSCAPHUS) IN ARIZONA Brian K. Sullivanl Key words: Bufa microscaphus, southwestern toad, Arizona, distribution, amphibian decline, riparian habitat, hybridization. The current distribution and status of pop­ adult toads were found, they were measured ulations of the southwestern toad, Bufo (snout-vent length in mm, SVL), pho­ microscaphus, are of considerable interest tographed, and released or retained as vouch­ given the suspected decline in anuran er specimens (deposited in the ASU Verte­ amphibians in the western United States brate Collection). If larvae were present, a (Blaustein and Wake 1990, Sweet 1991). This sample was collected and returned to the lab­ bufonid, typically associated with riparian oratory for rearing to allow confident identifi­ habitats in the desert Southwest, is largely cation (larvae of Bufo woodhousii and B.
    [Show full text]