DOCSLIB.ORG

National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Submission Listings Arizona

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES MULTIPLE PROPERTY SUBMISSION LISTINGS ARIZONA Grace Lutheran Church, Maricopa, Arizona, 93000835 FINDING AID Prepared by National Park Service - Intermountain Region Museum Services Program Tucson, Arizona August 2017 National Register of Historic Places – Multiple Property Submission Listings –Arizona 2 National Register of Historic Places – Multiple Property Submission Listings – Arizona Scope and Content Note: The National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) is the official list of the Nation's historic places worthy of preservation. Authorized by the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the National Park Service's National Register of Historic Places is part of a national program to coordinate and support public and private efforts to identify, evaluate, and protect America's historic and archeological resources. - From the National Register of Historic Places site: http://www.nps.gov/nr/about.htm The Multiple Property Submission (MPS) listings records are unique in that they capture historic properties that are related by theme, general geographic area, and/or period of time. The MPS is the current terminology for submissions of this kind; past iterations include Thematic Resource (TR) and Multiple Resource Area (MRA). Historic properties nominated under the MPS rubric will contain individualized nomination forms and will be linked by a Cover Sheet for the overall group. Historic properties nominated under the TR and MRA rubric are nominated as part of the whole group and will contain portions of nominations that come directly from the group Cover Sheet. MPS records from Arizona, on the whole, are comprised of nomination forms (signed, legal documents verifying the status of the properties as listed in the National Register) photographs, maps, correspondence, memorandums, and ephemera which document the efforts to recognize individual properties as part of a theme, general geographic area, and/or period of time that are historically significant to their community and/or state. Arrangement: The Multiple Property Submission listings records are arranged alphabetically by multiple property name. Therein individual properties within the group are arranged alphabetically by Resource Name. For nominations with the MPS moniker, researchers will find the physical files arranged in the following way: Nomination Form, Photographs, Maps, Correspondence, and then Other documentation. For nominations with the TR or MRA moniker, researchers will find files arranged in the following way: Photocopied portions of the Nomination Form from the Cover Sheet, photographs, and in some instances maps however maps for TR/MRA are generally stored with the Cover Sheet. National Register of Historic Places – Multiple Property Submission Listings –Arizona 3 Extent: The NRHP Multiple Property Submission listings for Arizona total 11 Linear Feet. Processing: The NRHP Multiple Property Submission listings records for Arizona were processed and cataloged at the Intermountain Region Museum Services Center by Karen Carver, Caitlin Godlewski, Hannah Gramson, Jennifer Newby, Karl Poechlauer, and Carmen Sterk. Associated Material: The NRHP Multiple Property Submission listings records exist in conjunction with additional National Register of Historic Places records and National Historic Landmark records. Researchers may benefit from accessing these associated bodies of records Arizona: National Register of Historic Places – Single Property Listings – Arizona o A county-by-county listing of individual properties National Historic Landmark – Arizona o A listing of nationally significant historic places designated by the Secretary of the Interior Copyright and Restriction Notice: The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted materials. The various state privacy acts govern the use of materials that document private individuals, groups, and corporations. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a reproduction if the document does not infringe the privacy rights of an individual, group, or corporation. These specified conditions of authorized use include: non-commercial and non-profit study, scholarship, or research, or teaching criticism, commentary, or news reporting as a NPS preservation or security copy as a research copy for deposit in another institution If a user later uses a copy or reproduction for purposes in excess of "fair use," the user may be personally liable for copyright, privacy, or publicity infringement. This institution's permission to obtain a photographic, xerographic, digital, or other copy of a document doesn't indicate permission to publish, exhibit, perform, reproduce, sell, distribute, or prepare derivative works from this document without first obtaining permission from the copyright holder and from any private individual, group, or corporation shown or otherwise recorded. National Register of Historic Places – Multiple Property Submission Listings –Arizona 4 Permission to publish, exhibit, perform, reproduce, prepare derivative works from, sell, or otherwise distribute the item must be obtained by the user separately in writing from the holder of the original copyright (or if the creator is dead from his/her heirs) as well as from any individual(s), groups, or corporations whose name, image, recorded words, or private information (e.g., employment information) may be reproduced in the source material. The holder of the original copyright isn't necessarily the National Park Service. The National Park Service is not legally liable for copyright, privacy, or publicity infringement when materials are wrongfully used after being provided to researchers for "fair use." This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if fulfillment of the order is judged in violation of copyright or federal or state privacy or publicity law. National Register of Historic Places – Multiple Property Submission Listings –Arizona 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Architecture and Planning of Josias Joesler and John Murphey in Tucson, Arizona, Multiple Property Submission………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………7-18 Bandelier’s, Adolph F.A., Archeological Survey of Tonto Basin, Tonto National Forest Multiple Property Submission (Contains RESTRICTED properties)……………………………………………………………………………….19-25 Benson Multiple Property Submission…………………………………………………………………………………………….26-31 Buckeye Architecture Multiple Property Submission………………………………………………………………………32-33 Casa Grande Multiple Resource Area (Contains RESTRICTED properties)……………………………………….34-47 Casa Grande, Arizona Multiple Property Submission………………………………………………………………………48-65 Cattle Ranching in Arizona in the Modern Era, 1945-1970 Multiple Property Submission……………..66-70 Cattle Ranching in Arizona Multiple Property Submission………………………………………………………………71-72 Cottonwood Multiple Resource Area……………………………………………………………………………………………..73-79 Depression-Era USDA Forest Service Administrative Complexes in Arizona Multiple Property Submission……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………....80-92 Downtown Tucson, Arizona Multiple Property Submission…………………………………………………………...93-101 Educational Buildings in Phoenix Multiple Property Submission………………………………………………….102-106 Flagstaff Multiple Resource Area………………………………………………………………………………………………….107-120 Florence Multiple Resource Area………………………………………………………………………………………………….121-130 Fort Lowell Multiple Resource Area……………………………………………………………………………………………..131-141 Globe Commercial and Civic Multiple Resource Area…………………………………………………………………..142-147 Historic and Historic Archeological Resources of Route 66 Multiple Property Resources…………….148-149 Historic Park Landscapes in National and State Parks Multiple Property Submission…………………..150-151 Historic Residential Suburbs in the United States, 1830-1960 Multiple Property Submission………152-153 Historic US Post Offices in Arizona, 1900-1941, Thematic Resource……….……………………………………154-158 Historic US Route 66 in Arizona Multiple Property Submission…………………………………………………….159-165 Hohokam and Euroamerican Land Use and Settlement Along the Northern Queen Creek Delta Multiple Property Submission (Contains RESTRICTED properties)……………………………………………………………...166-168 Hohokam Platform Mound Communities of the Lower Santa Cruz River Basin c. A.D. 1050--1450 Multiple Property Submission (Contains RESTRICTED properties)………………………………………………..169-171 Kingman Multiple Resource Area (Contains RESTRICTED properties)…………………………………………..172-202 Logging Railroad Resources of the Coconino and Kaibab National Forests Multiple Property Resource (Contains RESTRICTED properties)………………………………………………………………………………………………..203-209 Menlo Park Multiple Property Submission…………………………………………………………………………………...210-214 National Forest Fire Lookouts in the Southwestern Region Thematic Resource…………………………..215-243 Nineteenth-Century Residential Buildings in Phoenix Multiple Property Submission…………………..244-255 Nogales Multiple Resource Area (Contains RESTRICTED properties)…………………………………………….256-265 North Central Phoenix Farmhouses and Rural Estate Homes, 1895-1959 Multiple Property Submission…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...266-285 Phoenix Commercial Multiple Resource Area (Contains RESTRICTED properties)…………………………286-316 Prehistoric Walled Hilltop Sites of Prescott National Forest and Adjacent Regions Multiple Property
Recommended publications
  • CENTRAL ARIZONA SALINITY STUDY --- PHASE I Technical Appendix C HYDROLOGIC REPORT on the PHOENIX

    CENTRAL ARIZONA SALINITY STUDY --- PHASE I Technical Appendix C HYDROLOGIC REPORT on the PHOENIX

    CENTRAL ARIZONA SALINITY STUDY --- PHASE I Technical Appendix C HYDROLOGIC REPORT ON THE PHOENIX AMA Prepared for: United States Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation Prepared by: Brown and Caldwell 201 East Washington Street, Suite 500 Phoenix, Arizona 85004 Brown and Caldwell Project No. 23481.001 C-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ 2 LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................... 3 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 4 2.0 PHYSICAL SETTING ....................................................................................................... 5 3.0 GENERALIZED GEOLOGY ............................................................................................ 6 3.1 BEDROCK GEOLOGY ......................................................................................... 6 3.2 BASIN GEOLOGY ................................................................................................ 6 4.0 HYDROGEOLOGIC CONDITIONS ................................................................................ 9 4.1 GROUNDWATER OCCURRENCE ....................................................................
  • Hassayampa Landscape Restoration EA Aquatics Resources Report

    Hassayampa Landscape Restoration EA Aquatics Resources Report

    Hassayampa Landscape Restoration Environmental Assessment Aquatics Resources Report Prepared by: Albert Sillas Fishery Biologist Prescott National Forest for: Bradshaw Ranger District Prescott National Forest August 25, 2017 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
  • Here Copies of the Forms and Contact Sheets of Photographs Were Examined

    Here Copies of the Forms and Contact Sheets of Photographs Were Examined

    Form No 10-306 (Rev 10-7') UNITEDSTATl:.S DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR fOR NPS USE ONLY NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES RECEfVEQ 10EC 14 1987' INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM DAT£ ENTERED FOR FEDERAL PROPERTIES ---------------------------------~------SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPL.E7E NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS HISTORIC Nati ona 1 Forest Fi re Lookouts in the Southw~estern Region, USDA forest Service AND/OR COMMON National Forest Fire Lookouts in the Southwestern Region, USDA Forest Service • LOCATION sTAEEr&NuMaER National Forest System Lands in the States of Arizona and New Mexico N/A--NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITI. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT N A N VICINITY OF __s_T_AT_E_..A ... r,... · z ...on.n_aw ..-w------ 04 co_D_E _____,_.;:.a::::.;r:.,-=o;,.a;u.-,s .... •_.co .. u.. N_TY ______ c..oD_E.....,e,.;e __ _ ~ew ~xicc ~- See Item 10 Item 10 - IICLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE _DISTRICT .!.PUBLIC X.oCCUPIED -AGRICULTURE -MUSEUM l.BUILDING(SI _PRIVATE X..uNOCCUPIED _COMMERCIAL _PARK ~STRUCTURE -BOTH _WORK IN PROGRESS -EDUCATIONAL _PRIVATE RESIDENCE _SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE _ENTERTAINMENT -RELIGIOUS _OBJECT _IN PROCESS -YES RESTRICTED I.GOVERNMENT _SCIENTIFIC X Thematic N/AaE1NG CONSIDERED l_ YES UNRESTRICTED _INDUSTRIAL _ TRANSPORTATION - Group _NO _MILITARY -OTHER • AGENCY REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS (If IIPfl/iceltl•I USDA Forest Service - Soutbwestero Region STREET & NUMBER 517 Gold Avenue, S.W. CITI. TOWN STATE Ht.A- VICINITY OF New Mexico 87102 LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDS. ETC USDA Forest Service - Southwestern Region STREET & NUMBER 517 Gold Avenue S.W. CITI. TOWN -STATE Albuquerque New Mexico 87102 II REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Inventory of Fire Lookouts DATE 1986 LFEDERAL --5TATE _COUNTI -LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR Unit of Recreation, CRM Files, USDA Forest Service-Southwestern Region suRvEY REcoRos 517 Gold Avenue.
  • Coronado National Memorial Historical Research Project Research Topics Written by Joseph P. Sánchez, Ph.D. John Howard White

    Coronado National Memorial Historical Research Project Research Topics Written by Joseph P. Sánchez, Ph.D. John Howard White

    Coronado National Memorial Historical Research Project Research Topics Written by Joseph P. Sánchez, Ph.D. John Howard White, Ph.D. Edited by Angélica Sánchez-Clark, Ph.D. With the assistance of Hector Contreras, David Gómez and Feliza Monta University of New Mexico Graduate Students Spanish Colonial Research Center A Partnership between the University of New Mexico and the National Park Service [Version Date: May 20, 2014] 1 Coronado National Memorial Coronado Expedition Research Topics 1) Research the lasting effects of the expedition in regard to exchanges of cultures, Native American and Spanish. Was the shaping of the American Southwest a direct result of the Coronado Expedition's meetings with natives? The answer to this question is embedded throughout the other topics. However, by 1575, the Spanish Crown declared that the conquest was over and the new policy of pacification would be in force. Still, the next phase that would shape the American Southwest involved settlement, missionization, and expansion for valuable resources such as iron, tin, copper, tar, salt, lumber, etc. Francisco Vázquez de Coronado’s expedition did set the Native American wariness toward the Spanish occupation of areas close to them. Rebellions were the corrective to their displeasure over colonial injustices and institutions as well as the mission system that threatened their beliefs and spiritualism. In the end, a kind of syncretism and symbiosis resulted. Today, given that the Spanish colonial system recognized that the Pueblos and mission Indians had a legal status, land grants issued during that period protects their lands against the new settlement pattern that followed: that of the Anglo-American.
  • Coronado National Forest Draft Land and Resource Management Plan I Contents

    Coronado National Forest Draft Land and Resource Management Plan I Contents

    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Coronado National Forest Southwestern Region Draft Land and Resource MB-R3-05-7 October 2013 Management Plan Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona, and Hidalgo County, New Mexico The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Front cover photos (clockwise from upper left): Meadow Valley in the Huachuca Ecosystem Management Area; saguaros in the Galiuro Mountains; deer herd; aspen on Mt. Lemmon; Riggs Lake; Dragoon Mountains; Santa Rita Mountains “sky island”; San Rafael grasslands; historic building in Cave Creek Canyon; golden columbine flowers; and camping at Rose Canyon Campground. Printed on recycled paper • October 2013 Draft Land and Resource Management Plan Coronado National Forest Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona Hidalgo County, New Mexico Responsible Official: Regional Forester Southwestern Region 333 Broadway Boulevard, SE Albuquerque, NM 87102 (505) 842-3292 For Information Contact: Forest Planner Coronado National Forest 300 West Congress, FB 42 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 388-8300 TTY 711 [email protected] Contents Chapter 1.
  • Soil Survey Ik Salt River Valley, Arizona

    Soil Survey Ik Salt River Valley, Arizona

    Soil Survey in Salt River Valley Item Type text; Book Authors Means, Thos. H. Publisher College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Rights Public Domain: This material has been identified as being free of known restrictions under U.S. copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. Download date 28/09/2021 11:06:51 Item License http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/192405 U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, DIVISION OF SOILS MILTON "WHITNEY, Chief SOIL SURVEY IK SALT RIVER VALLEY, ARIZONA. THOMAS H MEANS [REPRINTED *ROM THE EFFORT o\ FIIID OPLK\.HO\S os mt I)IM^ION ot i OK 1900 ] CONTENTS. Page. Introduction _ to 287 Geology and topography _ 288 Climate 291 Soils 293 Pecos sand 294 River wash 293 Salt Eiver gravel 293 G-ilafine sandy loam 296 Salt River adobe 296 G-lendale loess „__ 299 Colluvial soils, or mountain waste - 302 Maricopa gravelly loam 303 Maricopa sandy loam _ 304 Maricopaloam 306 Maricopa clay lo?-m „ 307 Hardpan _ 308 Solrnaps - - 308 Tempesheet , 308 Phoenix sheet 309 Buckeye sheet 309 Irrigation waters 310 Underground waters 31S Tempesheet „ , 314 Phoenix sheet 315 Buckeye sheet , 317 Alkali of the soils 319 Templesheet 319 Origin of alkali salts of Tempe sheet 321 Reclamation of alkali lands 323 Phoenix &heet - - 325 Buckeye sheet-, S38 Agriculture in Salt River Valley 331 Fruit farming 331 Cattle raising - 33S Dairying * — - %8& in ILLUSTRATIONS. PLATES. PLATE XXIV. Character of native vegetation on desert land near the moun- tains 290 XXY. Irrigated lands in Tempe area 302 XXVI.
  • Once-Rugged Old Spanish Trail Celebrates 90Th Year Yuma

    Once-Rugged Old Spanish Trail Celebrates 90Th Year Yuma

    Local News Once-rugged Old Spanish Trail celebrates 90th year BY PAM M. SMITH, SUN STAFF WRITER Dec 9, 2005 Today is the 90th birthday of the Old Spanish Trail, a route that opened the way for cross-country vehicular traffic — with some help from Yuma's Ocean-to-Ocean Bridge. The Old Spanish Trail started in Mobile, Ala., Dec. 10, 1915, as the shortest vehicle route between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, said John W. Murphey, a historian with the New Mexico Department of Cultural Affairs Historic Preservation Division, in a telephone interview with The Sun. "Its route wound through several states, a path for the old Highway 80 — today's Interstates 8 and 10," Murphey said. The Ocean-to-Ocean Bridge, crossing from Arizona into California, was the last bridge on the southern Old Spanish Trail route. It was dedicated in 1915, a few months prior to the beginning of the trail itself. The 20th century automobile route was actually the second of two Old Spanish Trails. The first, dating back to the early 1800s, started in Santa Fe, N.M., and went north into Colorado, west through Utah, then southwest in Nevada, through the Mojave desert and into Los Angeles. The original Old Spanish Trail had been used by Native Americans and various explorers and traders before the modern highway route was opened. That highway route — the one celebrating its birthday today — was envisioned as a means for tourists to see Florida towns, go through Mobile and continue on their way west. During a convention in Mobile, 419 delegates from Alabama, Texas, New Mexico and Arizona created the future highway.
  • Phoenix Rising Foodie-Friendly8 Meet the City’S Restaurants Hotspots for Your Group

    Phoenix Rising Foodie-Friendly8 Meet the City’S Restaurants Hotspots for Your Group

    HOW TO CREATE Mindful Meetings Phoenix Rising Foodie-Friendly8 Meet the City’s Restaurants Hotspots For Your Group The Fabulous SAM FOX Mr. SHARES Fox HIS SECRETS OF SUCCESS azmeetings.com azmeetings.com PUBLISHER Barb Krause EDITORIAL DIRECTOR Shayna Mace ART DIRECTOR Kayla Collins GRAPHIC DESIGN Kayla Ermer Jerriann Mullen 35 ADVERTISING COORDINATOR Jerriann Mullen ARIZONA MEETINGS & EVENTS 2018 EDITION DIGITAL EDITOR Kristen Rouse Departments Features ADVERTISING SALES MANAGERS 4 FROM THE EDITOR 14 A Resort-Ready Meeting Linda Mittag Welcome to the new and improved Experience [email protected] Arizona Meetings & Events. The state’s top golf properties offer more Matt Cross than just par-for-the-course amenities. [email protected] 4 INDUSTRY UPDATES What’s exciting in the world of Arizona 20 Phoenix Rising hospitality news. Meet the city’s most creative, offbeat ADVERTISING SALES — GOLF Tom Hyslop settings to meet, dine and mingle in. [email protected] 5 PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT Ready, Set, Goal! Five solid ways to plan for and achieve your ACCOUNTING Danielle Stachowski goals. 7 TECH TRENDS PUBLISHED BY Nei-Turner Media Group, Inc. A Bigger Picture Phone (480) 321-7270 Four ways to make your event video work Fax (877) 245-2545 for you. ntmediagroup.com 8 WHERE IT’S AT 30 Prescott Perfection Copyright 2018. All rights reserved. 30 Adventures in Northern Arizona No part of this publication may be How Prescott became a must-visit Wow your group with eye-popping vistas, reproduced or transmitted by any means destination with cultural attractions and exciting activities and even exotic animals. without consent of the publisher.
  • Arizona Historic Bridge Inventory | Pages 164-191

    Arizona Historic Bridge Inventory | Pages 164-191

    NPS Form 10-900-a OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet section number G, H page 156 V E H I C U L A R B R I D G E S I N A R I Z O N A Geographic Data: State of Arizona Summary of Identification and Evaluation Methods The Arizona Historic Bridge Inventory, which forms the basis for this Multiple Property Documentation Form [MPDF], is a sequel to an earlier study completed in 1987. The original study employed 1945 as a cut-off date. This study inventories and evaluates all of the pre-1964 vehicular bridges and grade separations currently maintained in ADOT’s Structure Inventory and Appraisal [SI&A] listing. It includes all structures of all struc- tural types in current use on the state, county and city road systems. Additionally it includes bridges on selected federal lands (e.g., National Forests, Davis-Monthan Air Force Base) that have been included in the SI&A list. Generally not included are railroad bridges other than highway underpasses; structures maintained by federal agencies (e.g., National Park Service) other than those included in the SI&A; structures in private ownership; and structures that have been dismantled or permanently closed to vehicular traffic. There are exceptions to this, however, and several abandoned and/or privately owned structures of particular impor- tance have been included at the discretion of the consultant. The bridges included in this Inventory have not been evaluated as parts of larger road structures or historic highway districts, although they are clearly integral parts of larger highway resources.
  • YUMA COUNTY MULTI- JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN March 2019

    YUMA COUNTY MULTI- JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN March 2019

    YUMA COUNTY MULTI- JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN March 2019 YUMA COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: JURISDICTIONAL ADOPTION AND FEMA APPROVAL...................................................... 6 1.1 DMA 2000 Requirements ............................................................................................................................ 6 1.1.1 General Requirements............................................................................................................................. 6 1.1.2 Tribal Government Assurances ............................................................................................................. 6 1.2 Official Record of Adoption........................................................................................................................ 6 SECTION 2: INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 8 2.1 Plan History..................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Plan Purpose and Authority ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 General Plan Description............................................................................................................................. 8 SECTION 3: COMMUNITY DESCRIPTIONS .........................................................................................
  • The “Camp Grant Massacre” in the Historical Imagination

    The “Camp Grant Massacre” in the Historical Imagination

    The “Camp Grant Massacre” in the Historical Imagination Chip Colwell-Chanthaphonh Center for Desert Archaeology 300 E. University Blvd., Suite 230 Tucson, Arizona 85705 (520) 882-6946 [email protected] Arizona History Convention Tempe, Arizona April 25 – 26, 2003 HISTORICAL TEXTS AND HISTORICAL IMAGINATIONS Remembering and recording the past is fundamental to the human experience. From the chronicles of Herodotus to the origin stories of the Hopi, humans have long found the need to understand how the moments of the past have shaped the present (Vaughn 1985). History, as the attempt to construct a narrative of past events, is an interpretive exercise fashioned from bits of empirical data, memories, conjectures, ideas, and arguments. As the stories of the past enter a community’s collective memory, it becomes part of the historical imagination, the shared mental images a people possess of the past (Lowenthal 1985: 213). Novels or ancient myths may nourish the historical imagination, as it may be grounded in scholarly research or family photo albums. When history is written down, the text itself becomes a kind of cultural artifact that can help us excavate not simply the past as it happened, but also the present in which the moments of the past were imagined. Thus historical writings often tell us as much about the world of the author as it does the world depicted in the text. That history is imagined and not simply a duplicate of past events challenges several centuries of Western historiography, which has proceeded as if the past is wholly concrete and knowable. Nicholas Thomas has written that the “orthodox historical imagination” habitually fails “to acknowledge that versions of the past are always recreated for the here and now, are always politically inflected, partial, and interested” (Thomas 1991: 298).
  • To See the Full #Wemakeevents Participation List

    To See the Full #Wemakeevents Participation List

    #WeMakeEvents #RedAlertRESTART #ExtendPUA TOTAL PARTICIPANTS - 1,872 and counting Participation List Name City State jkl; Big Friendly Productions Birmingham Alabama Design Prodcutions Birmingham Alabama Dossman FX Birmingham Alabama JAMM Entertainment Services Birmingham Alabama MoB Productions Birmingham Alabama MV Entertainment Birmingham Alabama IATSE Local78 Birmingham Alabama Alabama Theatre Birmingham Alabama Alys Stephens Performing Arts Center (Alabama Symphony) Birmingham Alabama Avondale Birmingham Alabama Iron City Birmingham Alabama Lyric Theatre - Birmingham Birmingham Alabama Saturn Birmingham Alabama The Nick Birmingham Alabama Work Play Birmingham Alabama American Legion Post 199 Fairhope Alabama South Baldwin Community Theatre Gulf Shores Alabama AC Marriot Huntsville Alabama Embassy Suites Huntsville Alabama Huntsville Art Museum Huntsville Alabama Mark C. Smith Concert Hall Huntsville Alabama Mars Music Hall Huntsville Alabama Propst Arena Huntsville Alabama The Camp Huntsville Alabama Gulfquest Maritime Museum Mobile Alabama The Steeple on St. Francis Mobile Alabama Alabama Contempory Art Center Mobile Alabama Alabama Music Box Mobile Alabama The Merry Window Mobile Alabama The Soul Kitchen Music Hall Mobile Alabama Axis Sound and Lights Muscle Shoals Alabama Fame Recording Studio Muscle Shoals Alabama Sweettree Productions Warehouse Muscle Shoals Alabama Edwards Residence Muscle Shoals Alabama Shoals Theatre Muscle Shoals Alabama Mainstreet at The Wharf Orange Beach Alabama Nick Pratt Boathouse Orange Beach Alabama