DOCSLIB.ORG

Water and Riparian Resource Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water and Riparian Resource Report Four Forest Restoration Initiative, Rim Country EIS DRAFT Water and Riparian Resource Report Prepared by: Paul Brown Watershed Program Manager, ASNF for: 4FRI Rim Country EIS Date 5/16/2019 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected]. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender. 4FRI Rim Country Project, Water and Riparian Resource Report Table of Contents Introduction/Project Information ..................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................................ 1 Relevant Law, Regulation, and Policy ............................................................................................ 2 Land Management Plan Direction .............................................................................................. 6 Apache-Sitgreaves NF Forest Plan Direction .......................................................................... 6 Coconino NF Forest Plan Direction ...................................................................................... 18 Tonto NF Forest Plan Direction ............................................................................................ 33 Assumptions and Methodology ..................................................................................................... 37 Water Quality ........................................................................................................................ 38 Water Quantity ...................................................................................................................... 39 Riparian Resources ................................................................................................................ 39 Watershed Condition Framework .......................................................................................... 41 Affected Environment ................................................................................................................... 42 Climate Variability ................................................................................................................ 42 Water Quality ........................................................................................................................ 43 Stream Courses ...................................................................................................................... 48 Riparian and Stream Condition ............................................................................................. 48 Wetlands and Springs ............................................................................................................ 53 Caves ..................................................................................................................................... 54 Watersheds and Watershed Condition ................................................................................... 54 Issues/Indicators/Analysis Topic ................................................................................................... 56 Water Quality and Riparian Area Issues ....................................................................................... 56 Water Quality ........................................................................................................................ 57 Water Quantity ...................................................................................................................... 57 Riparian Resources ................................................................................................................ 57 Cumulative Effects and the Watershed Condition Framework ............................................. 57 Summary of Alternatives ............................................................................................................... 58 Design Features ............................................................................................................................. 60 Direct, Indirect, and Cumulative Effects ....................................................................................... 60 Alternative 1 – No Action ..................................................................................................... 69 Effects Common to All Action Alternatives ......................................................................... 71 Effects Unique to Each Action Alternative and Differences Among Them.......................... 78 Cumulative Effects Analysis ................................................................................................. 79 Monitoring Recommendations ...................................................................................................... 81 Compliance with Forest Plan and Other relevant Laws, Regulations, Policies and Plans ............ 83 The Legal Basis for BMPs .................................................................................................... 84 Short-term Uses and Long-term Productivity ....................................................................... 85 Unavoidable Adverse Effects ................................................................................................ 85 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitments of Resources .................................................... 85 Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................... 85 References Cited ............................................................................................................................ 87 Appendix A Spring and Seeps ...................................................................................................... 91 Table 1. Springs and Seeps .................................................................................................... 91 Table 2. SEAP scores .......................................................................................................... 112 Appendix B Watershed Condition Framework Scores ............................................................... 116 Appendix C. Design Features (Resource Protection Measures) .................................................. 122 Appendix D. Cumulative Effects Project Information ................................................................ 171 Table 1. Past/Completed project activities .......................................................................... 171 i 4FRI Rim Country Project, Water and Riparian Resource Report Table 2. Current/Ongoing project activities ........................................................................ 190 Table 3. Reasonably Foreseeable project activities ............................................................. 209 Table 4. Distribution of current/ongoing and reasonably foreseeable activities by subwatershed. ...................................................................................................................... 216 Table 5. Alternatives 2 and 3 Comparison for Vegetative Treatments and Prescribed Burning ............................................................................................................................................. 222 Table 6. Miles of Stream Restoration Proposed for Alternative 2 and 3. ............................ 236 Table 7. Wildfires current up to Watershed Condition Framework Scoring (2012) ........... 239 Table 8. Wildfires after Watershed Condition Framework Scoring (2012) ........................ 256 To refresh table of contents, click in it and press F9. To generate a list of tables or figures, go to References tab, captions group and click on “Insert Table of Figures”. Choose the appropriate caption label
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Lower Gila Region, Arizona
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR HUBERT WORK, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 498 THE LOWER GILA REGION, ARIZONA A GEOGBAPHIC, GEOLOGIC, AND HTDBOLOGIC BECONNAISSANCE WITH A GUIDE TO DESEET WATEEING PIACES BY CLYDE P. ROSS WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1923 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAT BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 50 CENTS PEE COPY PURCHASER AGREES NOT TO RESELL OR DISTRIBUTE THIS COPT FOR PROFIT. PUB. RES. 57, APPROVED MAT 11, 1822 CONTENTS. I Page. Preface, by O. E. Melnzer_____________ __ xr Introduction_ _ ___ __ _ 1 Location and extent of the region_____._________ _ J. Scope of the report- 1 Plan _________________________________ 1 General chapters _ __ ___ _ '. , 1 ' Route'descriptions and logs ___ __ _ 2 Chapter on watering places _ , 3 Maps_____________,_______,_______._____ 3 Acknowledgments ______________'- __________,______ 4 General features of the region___ _ ______ _ ., _ _ 4 Climate__,_______________________________ 4 History _____'_____________________________,_ 7 Industrial development___ ____ _ _ _ __ _ 12 Mining __________________________________ 12 Agriculture__-_______'.____________________ 13 Stock raising __ 15 Flora _____________________________________ 15 Fauna _________________________ ,_________ 16 Topography . _ ___ _, 17 Geology_____________ _ _ '. ___ 19 Bock formations. _ _ '. __ '_ ----,----- 20 Basal complex___________, _____ 1 L __. 20 Tertiary lavas ___________________ _____ 21 Tertiary sedimentary formations___T_____1___,r 23 Quaternary sedimentary formations _'__ _ r- 24 > Quaternary basalt ______________._________ 27 Structure _______________________ ______ 27 Geologic history _____ _____________ _ _____ 28 Early pre-Cambrian time______________________ .
    [Show full text]
  • Tonto National Forest 2019 LRMP Biological Opinion
    United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Arizona Ecological Services Office 9828 North 31st Avenue #C3 Phoenix, Arizona 85051-2517 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 Fax: (602) 242-2513 In reply, refer to: AESO/SE 02E00000-2012-F-0011-R001/02EAAZ00-2020-F-0206 December 17, 2019 Mr. Neil Bosworth, Forest Supervisor Tonto National Forest Supervisor’s Office 2324 East McDowell Road Phoenix, Arizona 85006 RE: Continued Implementation of the Tonto National Forest’s Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP) for the Mexican Spotted Owl and its Designated Critical Habitat Dear Mr. Bosworth: This document transmits our biological opinion (BO) for the reinitiation of formal consultation pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. § 1531-1544), as amended (ESA or Act), for the Tonto National Forest’s (NF) Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP). The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) and Forest Service are conducting this reinitiation in response to a September 12, 2019, court order in WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4:13-CV-00151-RCC. In response to this court order, as well as updated information regarding subjects in the BO, and current regulation and policy, we are updating the Status of the Species, Environmental Baseline, Effects of the Action, Cumulative Effects, and Incidental Take Statement sections of the April 30, 2012, Tonto NF LRMP BO (02E00000-2012-F-0011). We received your updated Biological Assessment (BA) on November 23, 2019. We are consulting on effects to the threatened Mexican spotted owl (Strix occidentalis lucida) (spotted owl or owl) and its critical habitat from the Forest Services’ continued implementation of the Tonto NF’s LRMP.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Stage Exhumation History of the Orocopia Schist of Southern California and Southwestern Arizona Rachel Elena Lishansky Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2011 Multi-stage exhumation history of the Orocopia schist of southern California and southwestern Arizona Rachel Elena Lishansky Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Lishansky, Rachel Elena, "Multi-stage exhumation history of the Orocopia schist of southern California and southwestern Arizona" (2011). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 10472. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/10472 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Multi-stage exhumation history of the Orocopia schist of southern California and southwestern Arizona by Rachel Elena Lishansky A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Geology Program of Study Committee: Carl E. Jacobson, Co-Major Professor Chris Harding, Co-Major Professor Paul G. Spry Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2011 Copyright © Rachel Elena Lishansky, 2011. All rights reserved. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF TABLES x LIST OF PLATES x ABSTRACT xi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 2. GEOLOGIC
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior
    United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Arizona Ecological Services Office 9828 North 31st Avenue #C3 Phoenix, Arizona 85051-2517 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 Fax: (602) 242-2513 In reply, refer to: AESO/SE 02E00000-2012-F-0011-R001/02EAAZ00-2020-F-0206 December 17, 2019 Mr. Neil Bosworth, Forest Supervisor Tonto National Forest Supervisor’s Office 2324 East McDowell Road Phoenix, Arizona 85006 RE: Continued Implementation of the Tonto National Forest’s Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP) for the Mexican Spotted Owl and its Designated Critical Habitat Dear Mr. Bosworth: This document transmits our biological opinion (BO) for the reinitiation of formal consultation pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. § 1531-1544), as amended (ESA or Act), for the Tonto National Forest’s (NF) Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP). The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) and Forest Service are conducting this reinitiation in response to a September 12, 2019, court order in WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4:13-CV-00151-RCC. In response to this court order, as well as updated information regarding subjects in the BO, and current regulation and policy, we are updating the Status of the Species, Environmental Baseline, Effects of the Action, Cumulative Effects, and Incidental Take Statement sections of the April 30, 2012, Tonto NF LRMP BO (02E00000-2012-F-0011). We received your updated Biological Assessment (BA) on November 23, 2019. We are consulting on effects to the threatened Mexican spotted owl (Strix occidentalis lucida) (spotted owl or owl) and its critical habitat from the Forest Services’ continued implementation of the Tonto NF’s LRMP.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Opinon on Proposed Grazing on the Tonto Basin, Walnut
    United States Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arizona Ecological Services Office 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021-4951 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 FAX: (602) 242-2513 In Reply Refer To: AESO/SE 02EAAZ00-2012-F-0423 02EAAZ00-2007-I-0221 July 24, 2014 Mr. Neil Bosworth, Forest Supervisor Tonto National Forest 2324 East McDowell Road Phoenix, Arizona 85006 Dear Mr. Bosworth: Thank you for your November 19, 2013, letter requesting formal consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544), as amended (Act), received by our office November 22, 2013. At issue are impacts that may result from proposed grazing on the Tonto Basin, Walnut, and 7/K Allotments on the Tonto National Forest (TNF), Gila County, Arizona. You concluded the proposed action “may affect, is likely to adversely affect” the endangered southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) and requested initiation of formal consultation. All the information necessary to initiate formal consultation was received on March 2, 2014. Your have also concluded the proposed project “may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect” designated critical habitat for the southwestern willow flycatcher, the threatened Mexican spotted owl (Strix occidentalis lucida) and its designated critical habitat, designated critical habitat for the endangered spikedace (Meda fulgida), the proposed yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus), the proposed northern Mexican gartersnake (Thamnophis eques megalops) and its proposed critical habitat, and the proposed narrow-headed gartersnake (Thamnophis rufipunctatus) and its proposed critical habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Magazine Were Rated by the Judges As Having More Than Ordinary Merit: "Pueblo" by Helen Young of Long Beach, California
    THE M A G A Z N E ••'-* 9W.-*&< APRIL. 1940 By DICK FREEMAN Los Angeles, California First prize winning photo- graph in the February contest conducted by the Desert Mag- azine. Taken with a 3lAxAVi Speed Graphic, 3.5 Zeiss Tessar lens, Super Double X film 1/195 second at f 16, K 2 filter. Mesut Following entries in the Feb- ruary amateur photograph con- test of the Desert Magazine were rated by the judges as having more than ordinary merit: "Pueblo" by Helen Young of Long Beach, California. "Desert Spring" by Jim Leon- ard, Los Angeles, California. "Peace" by Lester Selson, Los Angeles, California. Ute Sandi (at Twentynine Palms) By DUANE CLARK Alhambra, California Awarded second place in the February photographic contest. Picture was taken with a Con- tax 111 with 1/25 second ex- posure at f8. Eastman Plus X film with light red filter at 2:00 p. m. December 24, 1939. DESERT MAR. 29 Art exhibit by John Hilton closes at Desert Inn Art gallery. Palm Springs. Opened March 15- Al'R. 3 Old Folks day at Mesa, Arizona. 3-5 Palm Springs festival. Fashion show, April 3, Desert Circus, Apr. 4, Big Top ball, Racquet club, April 5. Volume 3 APRIL, 1940 Number 6 6 White Sands Play Day, Alamogor- do, New Mexico. Athletic events, COVER Horned Toad, photograph by Tad Nichols, cowboy and Spanish songs, dances Tucson, Arizona. by Mescalero reservation Indians. 7 Traditional Swiss Swing, Holtville, PHOTOGRAPHY Prize winning pictures in February . Inside cover California. Paul Eggler, Swiss club CALENDAR April events on the desert 1 president.
    [Show full text]
  • 4FRI Rim Country Project
    __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ United States Department of Agriculture 4FRI Rim Country Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 Apache-Sitgreaves, Coconino, and Tonto National Forests Coconino, Yavapai, Gila, and Navajo Counties, Arizona Forest Service Southwestern Region MB-R3-04-34 October 2019 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD- 3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountains of New Zealand a Listing Based on Topographical Merit
    Mountains of New Zealand A listing based on topographical merit Mountains are the beginning and end of all natural scenery John Ruskin 1819-1900 © New Zealand Alpine Club 2005 This may be reproduced for non-commercial use. This edition September 2005. Electronic copies are available in pdf format at www.alpineclub.org.nz. Comments, suggestions and corrections are welcome. Please send them to [email protected]. Introduction “How many mountains are there in New Zealand?” is a question to which there will never be a definitive answer, but it is hoped that these listings stimulate conversation and debate, and suggest more than a few challenges for those willing to take them up. The listings in these pages set out all those ‘mountains’ in New Zealand that meet two simple tests: firstly, that they reach an altitude of 1400 metres or more; and secondly, that they are at least 300 metres above the lowest saddle between them and the adjacent ‘mountain’. The first test was selected as the lowest rounded amount that would exclude all peaks that do not extend above the bush line. In the event two peaks in the Raukumara Range defy this assumption. The second test was chosen to ensure that the mountains included are commandingly higher than their environs and are clearly separate mountains and not subsidiary peaks. 300 metres of re-ascent is a demanding test in this regard. The result is a list of 856 mountains: more than a life time’s challenge for anybody! 35 of these are in the North Island and 821 in the South Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Avalanches in the Northern Front Range and the Central and Northern Mountains of Colorado
    United States Department of Agriculture Historic Avalanches in the Forest Service Northern Front Range and Rocky Mountain the Central and Northern Research Station Mountains of Colorado General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-38 M. Martinelli, Jr. and Charles F. Leaf September 1999 Martinelli, M., Jr.; Leaf, Charles F., compilers. 1999. Historic avalanches in the northern front range and the central and northern mountains of Colorado. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-38. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 270 p. Abstract Newspaper accounts of avalanche accidents from the 1860s through 1950 have been compiled, summarized, and discussed. Many of the avalanches that caused fatalities came down rather small, innocuous-looking paths. Land use planners can use historical avalanche information as a reminder of the power of snow avalanches and to assure rational development in the future. Keywords: avalanches, avalanche accidents, avalanche damage, avalanche fatalities, snowslides Authors M. Martinelli, Jr. is a retired principal meteorologist. He led the Mountain Snow and Avalanche Research Work Unit at the Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station until 1985. Charles F. Leaf is a consulting hydrologist and water resource engineer with the Platte River Hydrologic Research Center in Merino, Colorado. Publisher Rocky Mountain Research Station Fort Collins, Colorado You may order additional copies of this publication by sending August 1999 your mailing information in label form through one of the following media. Please send the publication title and number. Telephone (970) 498-1719 E-mail rschneider/[email protected] FAX (970) 498-1660 Mailing Address Publications Distribution Rocky Mountain Research Station 3825 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Management on the Tonto National Forest FEIS
    United States Department of Agriculture Travel Management on the Tonto National Forest Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume II–Response to Comments Tonto Publ. No MB-R3-12-04 Forest Service National Forest June 2016 1 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of the Antarctic
    NOIJ.VQNn OJ3ON3133^1 VNOI±VN r o CO ] ] Q) 1 £Q> : 0) >J N , CO O The National Science Foundation has TDD (Telephonic Device for the Deaf) capability, which enables individuals with hearing impairment to communicate with the Division of Personnel and Management about NSF programs, employment, or general information. This number is (202) 357-7492. GAZETTEER OF THE ANTARCTIC Fourth Edition names approved by the UNITED STATES BOARD ON GEOGRAPHIC NAMES a cooperative project of the DEFENSE MAPPING AGENCY Hydrographic/Topographic Center Washington, D. C. 20315 UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY National Mapping Division Reston, Virginia 22092 NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Division of Polar Programs Washington, D. C. 20550 1989 STOCK NO. GAZGNANTARCS UNITED STATES BOARD ON GEOGRAPHIC NAMES Rupert B. Southard, Chairman Ralph E. Ehrenberg, Vice Chairman Richard R. Randall, Executive Secretary Department of Agriculture .................................................... Sterling J. Wilcox, member Donald D. Loff, deputy Anne Griesemer, deputy Department of Commerce .................................................... Charles E. Harrington, member Richard L. Forstall, deputy Henry Tom, deputy Edward L. Gates, Jr., deputy Department of Defense ....................................................... Thomas K. Coghlan, member Carl Nelius, deputy Lois Winneberger, deputy Department of the Interior .................................................... Rupert B. Southard, member Tracy A. Fortmann, deputy David E. Meier, deputy Joel L. Morrison, deputy Department
    [Show full text]