Off-Shore Robotics, but There Are Also Other Applications Where the Results Are Indeed Applicable

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Off-Shore Robotics, but There Are Also Other Applications Where the Results Are Indeed Applicable Author Pål Johan From Title SOff-Shoreubtitle? Subtit lRoboticse? Subtitle? Subtitle? Subtitle? Subtitle? Subtitle? Subtitle? Robust and Optimal Solutions for Autonomous Operation Thesis for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor TThesisrondh forei mthe, Fdegreeebrua ofry Philosophiae2009 Doctor Trondheim, May 2010 Norwegian University of Science and Technology FNorwegianaculty of UniversityXXXXXXX ofXX ScienceXXXXX XandXX XTechnologyXXXXXX DFacultyepart ofm eInformationnt of XXX XTechnology,XXXXXXXX MathematicsXXXXXXXXX and Electrical Engineering Department of Engineering Cybernetics NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology Thesis for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor Faculty of Information Technology, Mathematics and Electrical Engineering Department of Engineering Cybernetics © 2010 Pål Johan From ISBN 978-82-471-2154-2 (printed ver.) ISBN 978-82-471-2155-9 (electronic ver.) ISSN 1503-8181 ITK report 2010-8-W Doctoral theses at NTNU, 2010:96 Printed by NTNU-trykk Summary The vast majority of research in the field of robotics has over the last few decades shifted from industrial robots—in the sense of robots mounted in a structured environment such as a factory floor—to robots operating in unstructured and harsh environments. Even though industrial robotics has become a mature research field we believe that there is still room for progress and improvement. In fact, we show this through both theoretical advances and experimental results in this thesis. However, the main focus of most researchers today has shifted towards autonomous robots and robots in unstructured environments, and this is also the main focus of the work presented here. This thesis is concerned with the borderline between the mature technology that in- cludes conventional industrial robots and robots operating in unstructured and harsh envi- ronments, an area that is still undergoing considerable advances. The oil fields of the future will have to adopt solutions from both mature and evolving technologies—including the borderline between them—and we will use this application to illustrate the practical im- portance of the theoretical results throughout the thesis. Several tasks to be performed by the robot on the oil fields of the future resemble the tasks performed by industrial robots on the factory floor in thousands of factories around the world today. In this sense we may consider this a mature and robust technology. At the same time the robots will have to work in an unstructured environment with little or no direct human intervention and au- tonomous operation is required also for non-routine tasks. In this sense, the oil platforms of the future present us with an interesting case study. We believe there to be two main issues that need to be addressed before partially or completely robotised oil platforms will see the light of day. The first is concerned with robustness. Robotic solutions will only be applied to tasks where the efficiency, accuracy, repeatability, and robustness surpass those of the human operator performing the same tasks. Remotely located oil platforms, and especially the ones located in sensitive areas such as the Barents Sea, are characterised by strict legislative standards to protect the environment and the wildlife. Any installation involving petrochemicals such as oil and gas will have to show for robust and reliable solutions at every stage of the operation. Thus, any operation involving robots will have to meet very high standards when it comes to robustness and fault tolerance. This imposes great challenges on the oil companies that are to operate in these areas. The second issue is concerned with the effectiveness and cost efficiency of the opera- tion. An experienced human operator has an incredible capability to find efficient solutions to both routine tasks and unexpected occurrences. The robotics system should also strive to solve any task in an optimal manner. Effective and cost efficient operation is vital to i SUMMARY be able to justify the high investment in research and installation related with robotised oil fields. Thus, for these systems to be interesting for the oil companies the daily operation should not only be more robust compared to human operators, it should also be more cost efficient to guarantee that the investment in expensive robotic equipment pays off. When it comes to remotely located oil fields, effectiveness and robustness are very much related. The main economical risk involved with the operation of oil platforms today is unscheduled shutdowns. Unscheduled shutdowns, as well as planned maintenance shutdowns, should be made as short as possible and if possible avoided. A robust solution with less chance of failure is thus something the oil companies strive for also with the economical gain as a motivation. This thesis is divided into four main parts. Part I is concerned with a large class of robotic systems that will play a very important role in the operation of remotely located oil platforms, namely vehicle-manipulator systems. One application of such systems is sub- sea installations where humans do not have direct access. The use of robots mounted on a underwater vehicles is believed to be the on-shore operator’s main tool for surveillance and operation of these fields. We are mainly concerned with the mathematical modelling of a large class of systems, including vehicle-manipulator systems. The main contribution of this part is the derivation of the dynamics of a general class of vehicle-manipulator sys- tems that also allows for joints that cannot be represented with generalised coordinates. These types of joints are often subject to singularities in the representation, but we use Lie groups and Lie algebras to represent the transformation between the local and global ve- locity variables and thus obtain a singularity-free formulation of the dynamics. The papers that are published in this part serve as a detailed study of vehicle-manipulator systems and are also intended to introduce these results to some relevant research areas where a singularity-free formulation is not normally adopted. We show that with our formulation we obtain a set of dynamic equations with the same complexity as the conventional La- grangian approach but without singularities. The joints are classified depending on what Lie group we use to represent the configuration space so we can easily build a library of joints types for easy implementation in a simulation environment. While Part I is mainly concerned with robustness in the sense that a suitable mathe- matical representation is chosen, Part II deals with robustness of the manipulator design. Specifically we address the problem of joint failure, i.e. when the joint loses its actuation and becomes a passive joint. This is an extremely serious situation as the passive joints in general cannot be controlled, and external forces, such as gravity or inertial forces, may cause the manipulator to collapse. This can result in severe damage to the robot’s sur- roundings. Based on a geometric approach, we thus analyse in detail the effects of joint failure on serial and parallel manipulators. We find that for serial manipulators this should be dealt with in the control of the robot once a joint failure is identified. For parallel manipulators, however, this should be dealt with in the design of the manipulator. We present a complete set of rules on how to choose the active and passive joints in a parallel manipulator in order to guarantee fault tolerance. Maintenance tasks on oil platforms are very important and especially for platforms situated in high sea, cold locations, and rough environments in general. The corrosion due to the salt water is for example very damaging to both the platform construction and the process area of the platform. High pressure water blasting is thus essential for maintenance and cleaning of the equipment. High pressure water blasting is also used for removing ice ii and preparing the surfaces to be painted. Painting the huge surfaces of the platform with frequent intervals is another very time consuming task that needs to be performed by the robots. In Part III we show how we can improve efficiency for robots that are to perform these tasks by introducing an extended definition of functional redundancy. All the tasks above are so called pointing tasks, i.e. tasks where only the direction of the robot tool is of concern and not the orientation. We extend this definition to also allow a small error in the orientation of the robot tool. For these tasks a small error in the orientation will not affect the quality of the job, but—as we illustrate through both theoretical and experimental results—this allows us to substantially reduce the time needed to perform the task. We show how to cast the problem of finding the optimal orientation error into a convex optimisation problem that allows us to find the solution in real time. This makes the approach suitable for several tasks performed by the robotic systems on oil platforms, but also for spray paint and welding applications in factory installations. The process area on an oil platform is very complex and the use of redundant manip- ulators to get access to every part of the robot is inevitable. The inverse kinematics of redundant robots, however, is challenging due to the infinite number of solutions to the problem. There are also other robots that do not have a known analytical solution to the inverse kinematics problem. One example is robots with complex geometry, which often occurs when we put the cables connecting the tool and the base on the inside of the manip- ulator structure. Similarly to kinematically redundant manipulators there is in this case no known solution to the inverse kinematics problem, which thus needs to be solved numeri- cally. In Part IV we present a set of iterative solutions to the inverse kinematics problem. We divide the problem into several sub-problems that can be solved analytically.
Recommended publications
  • Six DOF Spray Painting Robot Analysis
    ISSN (Print) : 2320 – 3765 ISSN (Online) : 2278 – 8875 International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering (An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization) Vol. 4, Issue 9, September 2015 Six DOF Spray Painting Robot Analysis Om Prakash Gujela1, Vidhatri Gujela2, Dev Prakash Gujela3 Asst. Professor, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, SHIATS, Allahabad, India1 Asst. Professor, Dept. of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, HMFA Memorial Institute of Engineering & Technology, Allahabad, India2 External Assessor, TUV SUD South Asia, Delhi, India3 ABSTRACT: Today, different kinds of robots are being used in many fields. Especially in industries, robots are essential. One application in the industries is spray painting task which is no more suitable for human workers because it have large effect on health. Also the spray painting is a challenging task and need significant skill. Thus, spray painting robot are using wider and wider. This paper represents the analysis of a spray painting robot. Calculations and analysis are made to get the position and orientation of end effector. Also the spray painting patch and angles of each joint are calculated in this analysis. Position and orientation of end effector are analysed by forward kinematic. The angles of each joint are find out by inverse kinematic. Denavit- Hartenberg (D-H) methods are used in forward and inverse kinematic. Spray painting patch is generated by finding the equation of the surface of regular shape work-piece. Measurement and observation of robot are made on SolidWorks software. In this analysis, the calculation is quite complex and containing many variables even in an element of a matrix. Such kind of long equations are simplified by using MATLAB software.
    [Show full text]
  • A Century of ABB Review
    W ABB 2 |14 review en 100 years of ABB Review 7 40 years in robotics 24 60 years of HVDC 33 Boundaries of knowledge 68 The corporate technical journal A century of ABB Review Dear Reader, Technological innovation has been the cornerstone of ABB’s success since the founding of our predecessor companies in the late 19th century. Today, we invest $1.5 billion each year in R&D and we have 8,500 technologists focused on power and automation innova- tions around the world. For 100 years, ABB Review has been keeping our shareholders, customers and employees informed about our innovative solutions and achievements in the areas of power and auto- mation. Just like ABB, ABB Review is continually innovating in terms of content and design. The next phase of ABB Review will be to strengthen its pres- ence online to meet the oppor - tunities and demands of the digital world, for instance through more interactive communication. We are proud to share our centenary issue with you. Ulrich Spiesshofer Chief Executive Officer ABB Group 2 ABB review 2|14 Contents 7 100 years of ABB Review Centenary Looking back on a century in print 21 Editors’ picks celebration Treasures from the archives 24 Rise of the robot Perpetual Celebrating 40 years of industrial robotics at ABB 33 60 years of HVDC Pioneering ABB’s road from pioneer to market leader 42 Pumping efficiency Knowledge to A 100 MW converter for the Grimsel 2 pumped storage plant power 48 Unit of power Cutting-edge motor design redefines power density 54 Multitalented ACS800 power electronics can do more than rotate a motor 58 Hot spot Power A new infrared sensor measures temperature in generator circuit breakers is knowledge 65 At a higher level A medium-voltage-level UPS for complete power protection 68 Boundaries of knowledge Knowledge of boundary conditions is crucial for reliable simulations 74 Pushing the limits Turbine simulation for next-generation turbochargers Contents 3 Editorial 100 years of ABB Review Dear Reader, History often holds the key to understanding taking up the IRB 6’s anthropomorphic the present.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Systems Training at M-TEC
    AUTOMATED SYSTEMS TRAINING AT THE M-TEC Macomb Community College’s Michigan Technical Education Center (M-TEC) is the College’s headquarters for its engineering and advanced technology workforce and continuing education team. The M-TEC is a 40,600-square-foot facility providing education and training in advanced integrated manufacturing, automated systems and robotics. We work across multiple industry sectors and in collaboration with employers to develop and deliver customized solutions addressing the technical talent pipeline at every level of an organization or industry sector. A $2.6 million investment by the Department of Labor, Michigan’s Community College Skilled Trades Equipment Program and the College has funded a major upgrade of the facility, advancing its capabilities in advanced integrated manufacturing, automated systems and robotics. M-TEC offers training on the latest industry-specific equipment in body- shop, paint, general assembly and powertrain. These Open Enrollment courses provide a way for companies to get the in-demand training they require in the most cost effective way. This is just a small part of what we do. There are many more training courses available so if you don’t see what you need, please ask! We specialize in customized training that meets your specific need. Equipment Summary FANUC Robot Cells with Weld Controllers FANUC Robotics Paint Cell FANUC Robot Cell with Nordson Sealant System FANUC Fenceless CERT Carts with iRVision ABB Portable Robotic Work Cells with RFID and Conveyor Siemens S7/TIA
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Autonomous Wall Painting Robot Using Raspberry Pi and Image Processing
    Special Issue - 2020 International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) ISSN: 2278-0181 IETE – 2020 Conference Proceedings Development of Autonomous Wall Painting Robot using Raspberry Pi and Image Processing Nayana C G Mamatha D Assistant Professor, Dept. of TCE, GSSSIETW Dept. of TCE, GSSSIETW, Mysuru Mysuru Nandini M Nandini S Dept. of TCE, GSSSIETW Dept. of TCE, GSSSIETW Mysuru Mysuru Abstract-This paper describes development of Automatic Wall II. PROBLEM STATEMENT Painting Robot prototype which helps to achieve low cost Painting is often tedious, repetitive work, as well as painting equipment. It would offer the opportunity to reduce being time-consuming work which in turn costs money. or eliminate human exposure to difficult and hazardous Also, workers risk exposure to harmful toxins. In addition environments, which would solve most of the problems to the fact that manual painting, paint guns depend mostly connected with safety when many activities occur at the same time.The system performs the painting process by the use of on human precision, when compared to automated spraying image captured by the pi camera. The painting area is lacks consistency. Manual wall painting is repetitive, time- calculated and information is transferred to the spray gun. consuming, physically exhaustive, and dangerous [1] [2]. The painting is done using bound box. Raspberry pi module Spray painting robot is an important advanced paint will control the base DC motors and the actuator. The production equipment, which is widely used in the paint actuator while extending and retracting raises the scissor lift production line of automotive and other products at home and lowers it, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Spray Painting Robots
    SHOWCASE:Robotic Painting Spray Painting Robots Robots for a variety of coating applications are featured on the following pages . Four Robots in One The New Technol- ogy Hydraulic (NTH) finishing system has 360.deg capability with six degrees of arm freedom for a work envelope that allows one robot to do the work of four. The work envelope features a complete overlapping torus with a majar diam- eter of 206 ft. The system covers a 32-ft radius, and the trans- porter has vertical motion to 6.5 ft. Payload is 10 Ibs at ful1 speed, ful1 accel- eration and ful1 accu- racy. Main-axis speed is 90 deg per sec and main-axis acceleration is 150 to 220 The NTH robot has a remote station for deg per sec. programming without downtime. S~UJ-ce: Kremlin, Inc., Addison, Illinois. For more data circle 270 on Postpaid Card 120 PRODUCTS FINISHING JIJNE, 1992 Quality and Consistency Model EE 10 all-electric paint- ing robot is Factory-Mutual ap- proved for spray painting. Pay- load is 22 Ib, and the robot operates at speeds to 6.5 ft per sec. Repeatability is kO.02 inch, providing for a consistent qual- ity finish. Sour-ce: Kawasaki Robotics, Farmington Hills, Michigan. For. morc data circle 271 011 Postpuid CUTd Painting a Variety The P-155 six-axis, electric paint robot for automotive and non-automotive coating appli- cation applies primers, topcoats, underbody deadener, anti-chip, camouflage and other paint materials. The P-155 retains the wrist and outer arm of the company’s P- 150 robot along with the cast- aluminum construction, AC servo drive, precision ground and hardened gears and sealed construction.
    [Show full text]
  • D8.2 Stakeholder Analysis and Mapping
    REMODEL - Robotic tEchnologies for the Manipulation of cOmplex DeformablE Linear objects Deliverable 8.2 – STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS AND MAPPING ___________________________________________________________________ Version 2020-10-31 Project acronym: REMODEL Project title: Robotic tEchnologies for the Manipulation of cOmplex DeformablE Linear Grant Agreement No.: 870133 ObjectsTopic: DT-FOF-12-2019 Call Identifier: H2020-NMBP-TR-IND-2018-2020 Type of Action: RIA Project duration: 48 months Project start date: 01/11/2019 Work Package: WP8 – Communication/Dissemination, Exploitation and Knowledge Management Lead Beneficiary: TECNALIA Authors: All partners Dissemination level: Public Delivery date: 31/10/2020 Project website address: https://REMODEL-project.eu Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 3 2 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 4 3 Market analysis............................................................................................................... 5 1 Market sectors ............................................................................................................ 5 3.1 Sectorial applications ................................................................................................ 8 3.1.1 Automotive .................................................................................................................. 9 3.1.2
    [Show full text]
  • FANUC Robotics SYSTEM R-30Ia and R-30Ib Controller KAREL
    FANUC Robotics SYSTEM R-30iAandR-30iB Controller KAREL Reference Manual MARRC75KR07091E Rev D Applies to Version 7.50 and higher © 2012 FANUC Robotics America Corporation About This Manual This manual can be used with controllers labeled R-30iAorR-J3iC. If you have a controller labeled R-J3iC,youshouldreadR-30iAasR-J3iC throughout this manual. Copyrights and Trademarks This new publication contains proprietary information of FANUC Robotics America Corporation, furnished for customer use only. No other uses are authorized without the express written permission of FANUC Robotics America Corporation. FANUC Robotics America Corporation 3900 W. Hamlin Road Rochester Hills, MI 48309-3253 The descriptions and specifications contained in this manual were in effect at the time this manual was approved. FANUC Robotics America Corporation, hereinafter referred to as FANUC Robotics, reserves the right to discontinue models at any time or to change specifications or design without notice and without incurring obligations. FANUC Robotics manuals present descriptions, specifications, drawings, schematics, bills of material, parts, connections and/or procedures for installing, disassembling, connecting, operating and programming FANUC Robotics’ products and/or systems. Such systems consist of robots, extended axes, robot controllers, application software, the KAREL® programming language, INSIGHT® vision equipment, and special tools. FANUC Robotics recommends that only persons who have been trained in one or more approved FANUC Robotics Training Course(s) be permitted to install, operate, use, perform procedures on, repair, and/or maintain FANUC Robotics’ products and/or systems and their respective components. Approved training necessitates that the courses selected be relevant to the type of system installed and application performed at the customer site.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of Automated Image Injecting and Painting Robot
    International Journal of Research and Review www.ijrrjournal.com E-ISSN: 2349-9788; P-ISSN: 2454-2237 Original Research Article Design Of Automated Image Injecting And Painting Robot S. Kalaimagal1, A. Arun Raja2 1II Year, M.E Embedded Systems Technologies 2Assistant Professor, M.E Embedded Systems Technologies, Sri Ramakrishna Engineering College, Coimbatore, India Corresponding Author: S. Kalaimagal Received: 27/04/2015 Revised: 14/05/2015 Accepted: 16/05/2015 ABSTRACT Wall painting is a repetitive, exhausting and hazardous process which makes it an ideal case for automation. There is a strong need for a mobile robot that can move to paint interior walls of residential buildings. In this paper, the conceptual design of an autonomous wall painting robot is described consisting of an arm that scans the walls. IR sensors are attached to the mobile platform and used to maintain a certain distance from the facing wall and to avoid collision with side walls. When settled on adjusted distance from the wall, the controller starts the painting process autonomously. The design objective is to satisfy the criteria of simplicity, low weight, low cost. Keywords: Construction, Wall Painting Robot, spray Painting, Building Automation, Safety. I. INTRODUCTION growing rapidly. But the labors in the Construction paint robots are still construction industry are not sufficient. This in use today but are of inferior quality and insufficient labor in the construction safety to the latest electronic offerings. The industry is because of the difficulty in the newest robots are accurate and deliver work. This automatic wall painting robot is results with uniform film builds and exact not designed using complicated components.
    [Show full text]
  • Parks, Recreation and Greenways Master Plan
    Vision Holly Springs Comprehensive Plan Chapter 3: Parks, Recreation and Greenways Master Plan Adopted: March 16, 2021 Holly Springs Parks, Recreation, and Greenway Trails Master Plan CHAPTER # - NAME TOWN OF HOLLY SPRINGS PARKS, RECREATION, AND GREENWAYS MASTER PLAN March 2021 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Department of Parks and Recreation Additional members from other committees LeeAnn Plumer, CPRP - Parks and Recreation Director Van Crandall, Planning Board Matt Beard, AICP – Park Planner Joe Fuller, Tree Advisory Committee Adam Huffman - Assistant Director Julia Janosko, Tree Advisory Committee Tay Abebe, Mayor’s Youth Advisory Board Administration Faatimah Bell, Mayor’s Youth Advisory Board Randy Harrington - Town Manager J. Scott Chase - Assistant Town Manager Consultant Team Daniel Weeks - Assistant Town Manager McAdams Company, Design Lead Mayor and Town Council Rachel Cotter, RLA - Project Manager Dick Sears - Mayor Shweta Nanaker, RLA - Landscape Architect Dan Berry - Mayor Pro-Tem Garrett Jenkins - Designer + Graphics Specialist Christine Kelly - Councilmember Erich Melville - Greenway Planner Pete Villadsen - Councilmember Shaun McGrath - Councilmember PROS Consulting Dr. Aaron Wolff - Councilmember Leon Younger, President Steering Committee ETC Institute Jason Morado, President Recreation Advisory Committee Members Susan Smith, Chairperson Molly Sapienza, Vice-Chairperson Elizabeth Stone, Secretary H. Val Atkinson Stephen Brauer Christopher Cook Alice Reese Len Lloyd Jason Guetgemann Pete Villadsen, Town Council Representative Christine
    [Show full text]
  • When and Why to Select Painting Robot
    WHEN AND WHY TO SELECT PAINTING ROBOT If a company is seriously considering a robot for its painting operation, there are two questions to answer. Is a paint robot truly the right automation choice for the application? If so, how would a robot impact the painting system's overall design and operation? Spray painting methods are categorized into the three most common types: Manual. A human operator with a spray gun.Hard Automation. Spray guns affixed to stationary gun arms or systems such as reciprocators, spinning guns or two- or three-axis positioners.Robot. Generally a six- axis programmable device capable of complex arm and wrist motion. Many times a robot is suggested as the answer to a painting problem; however, this often happens without sufficient analysis of application requirements. Although robots are now faster, more flexible and easier to program, they are not the only or best solution for every application. Sometimes users are so fascinated with a robot that they do not examine whether their parts can be painted more quickly and inexpensively with a less exotic technique. Part Shape. Complex parts with recesses, curved surfaces and picture-frame-like qualities are great candidates for a robot. Others, such as flat sheet panels or those having simple geometry are handled easily with less expensive mechanisms. If keeping the spray gun normal to the part surface requires a great deal of articulation, then a robot is a consideration. Part Variety. The variety of part shapes and sizes bears greatly on how best to paint them. A low-volume job shop where no two painted parts are the same would be a poor location for a robot.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion Planning of Multi-Robot System for Airplane Stripping Rawan Kalawoun
    Motion planning of multi-robot system for airplane stripping Rawan Kalawoun To cite this version: Rawan Kalawoun. Motion planning of multi-robot system for airplane stripping. Robotics [cs.RO]. Université Clermont Auvergne, 2019. English. NNT : 2019CLFAC008. tel-02284448 HAL Id: tel-02284448 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02284448 Submitted on 11 Sep 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Ecole´ doctorale no70: Sciences pour l’ingenieur´ THESE` pour obtenir le grade de docteur delivr´ e´ par l’ Universite´ Clermont Auvergne Specialit´ e´ doctorale “Electronique´ et Systemes”` present´ ee´ et soutenue publiquement par Rawan KALAWOUN le 26 Avril 2019 Motion planning of multi-robot system for airplane stripping Jury Nacim Ramdani, Professeur des universites,´ PRISME (Bourges) Rapporteur Philippe Fraisse, Professeur des universites,´ LIRMM (Montpellier) Rapporteur Fabrice Le Bars, Maˆıtre de conferences,´ Lab-STICC (Brest) Examinateur Ouiddad Labbani-Igbida, Professeur des universites,´ XLIM (Limoges) Examinatrice Youcef Mezouar, Professeur des universites,´ Institut Pascal (Aubiere)` Directeur Sebastien´ Lengagne, Maˆıtre de conferences,´ Institut Pascal (Aubiere)` Encadrant Universite´ Clermont Auvergne - SIGMA Clermont Institut Pascal, UMR 6602 CNRS/UCA/SIGMA Clermont, F-63171 Aubiere,` France Abstract This PHD is a part of a French project named AEROSTRIP, (a partnership between Pascal Institute, Sigma, SAPPI, and Air-France industries), it is funded by the French Government through the FUI Program (20th call).
    [Show full text]
  • Painting Powerpac
    ABB Robotics Operating manual Painting PowerPac Trace back information: Workspace RW 5-15-01 version a4 (not checked in) Published 2013-04-01 at 11:06:15 Skribenta version 1184 Operating manual Painting PowerPac Document ID: 3HNA019758-001 Revision: G © Copyright 2008-2013 ABB. All rights reserved. The information in this manual is subject to change without notice and should not be construed as a commitment by ABB. ABB assumes no responsibility for any errors that may appear in this manual. Except as may be expressly stated anywhere in this manual, nothing herein shall be construed as any kind of guarantee or warranty by ABB for losses, damages to persons or property, fitness for a specific purpose or the like. In no event shall ABB be liable for incidental or consequential damages arising from use of this manual and products described herein. This manual and parts thereof must not be reproduced or copied without ABB's written permission. Additional copies of this manual may be obtained from ABB. The original language for this publication is English. Any other languages that are supplied have been translated from English. © Copyright 2008-2013 ABB. All rights reserved. ABB AS, Robotics Discrete Automation and Motion N-4349 BRYNE Norway Table of contents Table of contents Overview .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Product documentation, M2004 ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]