DOCSLIB.ORG

T-26 Light Tank: Backbone of the Red Army Pdf, Epub, Ebook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
T-26 Light Tank: Backbone of the Red Army Pdf, Epub, Ebook T-26 LIGHT TANK: BACKBONE OF THE RED ARMY PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Steven Zaloga,Henry Morshead | 48 pages | 20 Jan 2015 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9781472806253 | English | Oxford, United Kingdom T-26 Light Tank: Backbone of the Red Army PDF Book US Destroyers Pre-war classes. The Ragged Soldier. Nine tanks of the battalion crossed the Dnieper River but eleven remained in enemy territory after the bridge was destroyed, with the remainder having been lost in combat. Three Soviet tank brigades lost all of their tanks, but inflicted heavy losses on the enemy. Madrid, Spain: AF Editores. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Kirov in Leningrad , and Factory No. Steven J. The Bolshevik Factory needed to convert all tank drawings from imperial units into metric, in order to develop a production technology, special tools, and equipment. Parma: Albertelli Editions. Panther vs Sherman Battle of the Bulge Yangtze River Gunboats On 17 September , T tanks of the Belorussian Front the 22nd, the 25th, the 29th and the 32nd Tank Brigades and T tanks of the Ukrainian Front the 26th, the 36th and the 38th Tank Brigades crossed the Polish border. Kalinovsky the Moscow Military District. Newer Post Older Post Home. The next military operation the T light tank participated in was the Soviet-Japanese border conflict, commencing with the Battle of Lake Khasan , in July British Motor Torpedo Boat Vietnam Riverine Craft Matilda Infantry Tank The B-3 gun had less recoil and a smaller breech compared to the PS-2, so it could be easily mounted in the normal machine gun turret of the T Factory managers tried to promote tanks of their own design rather than producing Ts. The T of captain Arman was burned by a gasoline bomb; although wounded, Arman continued to lead the tank company. Kalinin started its series production under the designator B-3 5K. CS1 maint: location link House, Jonathan M. Poor production standards were the reason behind the frequent failures of tank engines, gear boxes, springs in suspension, tracks and rubber-covered road wheels of early Ts. Experimental and improvised vehicles. Della stessa collana Other editions. The tank commander communicated with the driver by speaking tube, which was replaced with a signalling lamp in By the summer of , most of the Red Army's vast numbers of tanks were suffering from serious wear and tear. Changes to the turret and armament fundamentally improved the design. Austrian Napoleonic Artillery In addition, captured T light tanks were used by the Finnish, German, Romanian and Hungarian armies. T-26 Light Tank: Backbone of the Red Army Writer Beijing, China: Press of Liberation Army. Early Soviet-made tank engines were of bad quality but they became better beginning in Grid Wargaming. T tanks continued to be used in combat throughout the Soviet-German front from the Barents Sea to the Black Sea Battle of the Crimea in , but in steadily decreasing numbers as each T tank that was destroyed or lost to technical problems was being replaced by a T Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank Imperial Japanese Navy Destroyers 1. Fort Leavenworth, Kansas U. Union Monitor These were dissected tanks to demonstrate the relative position and function of tank components during tank crew training. KATI marked it as to-read Sep 21, Osprey New Vanguard Otechestvennye bronirovannye mashiny. Subscribe to: Post Comments Atom. Bell UH-1 Huey -Slicks- A cutting of armoured plates was more rough than developed during the Winter War; the majority of these modified tanks did not have a moving armoured gun mask as seen in Factory No. M8 Greyhound Light Armored Car Panzerkampfwagen IV Ausf. T and T Main Battle Tanks Panther vs Sherman Battle of the Bulge In accordance to the letter order of the General Military Council of the RKKA from 1 January , each rifle division should have a tank battalion consisting of 54 T tanks including 15 flame-throwing tanks and a rifle regiment should have a tank company of 17 Ts. Type of Light infantry tank. As my aim is to have between 10 and Captured Ts were also used by the German, Romanian and Hungarian armies. The T was the first major Soviet program of the s, beginning as a license-built version of the British Vickers 6-ton export tank. Svirin, Mikhail; Kolomiets Maxim Soviet turrets had a round firing port for the Degtyarev light machine gun , as opposed to the rectangular ports used by the original British design for the Vickers machine gun. German Light Panzers After the end of combat operations, 39 of these tanks were restored in tank units and others were repaired in workshop conditions. The Ragged Soldier. Featuring rules, battle reports, and all sorts of miscellaneous wargaming and other topics. Indeed, more T tanks were manufactured than the combined tank production of Germany, France, Britain, and the United States in The Pirate Ship Ships of the American Revolutionary Navy. Retrieved 19 October The GAZ T a copy of the Armstrong Siddeley Puma engine did not have an over-speed limiter, which often resulted in overheating and engine valve breakage, especially in summer. Some Ts produced at the end of — had a riveted and welded hull. Kalinovsky the Moscow Military District. The first 10 Ts were assembled in July — they were identical to British Vickers 6-Ton tanks except for their armament. IS-2 Heavy Tank British Airships All five experimental T artillery tanks were tested during military exercises near Leningrad in September before scheduled series production of 50 such vehicles in The T was the first major Soviet armour program of the s, beginning as a license-built version of the British Vickers 6-ton export tank. Other Editions 4. Sovetskie tanki v boyu. The ability of the two turrets of the Type A to turn independently made it possible to fire to both the left and right at once, which was considered advantageous for breakthroughs of field entrenchments. However, the Romanians could not repair most of the captured vehicles and so not all were used in combat. Della stessa collana Panzerkampfwagen IV Medium Tank On 1 June , the Red Army had 10, T light tanks of all models on their inventories, including armoured combat vehicles based on the T chassis. Yakovlev's T was penetrated by nine shells, but was never taken out of action. T-26 Light Tank: Backbone of the Red Army Reviews German Panzers In , Turkey purchased 60 T mod. Grid based wargaming - but not always. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Approaching , both battalions had similar organization, their third companies equipped with T tanks. Robert Bob Cordery Tuesday, July 02, am. Bronze Age War Chariots. Kolomiets, Maxim Bundle Offer! The random thoughts of an ancient wargamer. However, the Romanians could not repair most of the captured vehicles and so not all were used in combat. Punaiset panssarit — Puna-armeijan panssarijoukot — Red tanks — the Red Army's armoured forces — in Finnish. Of these, 10 T mod. Kolomiets, Maxim Soviet armoured fighting vehicles of World War II. Yakovlev received the Hero of the Soviet Union award. Among tank units, equipped with the T, the actions of the 35th Light Tank Brigade commander — colonel V. The remaining Ts participated in battles with the Germans and their allies during the Battle of Moscow from —42, the Battle of Stalingrad and the Battle of the Caucasus from — Despite the fact that this defect was unrelated to turret design, the military representatives cancelled the order to produce the T Dan Doughty marked it as to-read Dec 04, British Battleships 2. Though the T saw no active action on the main Soviet-German front in , the T still equipped some rearward units. British Battlecruisers Almantas Leika rated it really liked it Dec 18, T tanks participated in the victory over Japan parade in Harbin in September Voroshilov factory No. The T's turret construction was the design used in the series-produced BT-7A artillery tank. The PS-3 had better specifications in comparison with the series-produced KT tank gun and also had several technical innovations foot firing switch, original training gear, travelling position fixing, binocular optical sight. German Battleships The first series-produced T tanks were shown to the public during the military parade on Red Square in Moscow on 7 November —the 14th anniversary of the October Revolution. T mod. And Zaloga even provides the formula for the standard Soviet armor paint — 4BO camouflage green! T-26 Light Tank: Backbone of the Red Army Read Online Little Wars Revisited. Completed B-3 guns were mounted on BT-2 light tanks after mid Some tanks had a vertically stabilised TOP-1 gun telescopic sight. Confederate Blockade Runner There were 1, T, BT and T tanks at the Northwest Front in the beginning of February , which increased to 1, tanks on 28 February when the breakthrough of the second Finnish line of defense began. Acquisti on line le condizioni di contratto. Tank platoons suffered significant losses because of poor infantry reconnaissance of Finnish positions and ambushes, and absence of engineer support. British Battleships 2. Simple Wargames are Go! Italian Light Tanks. The simple and easy-to-maintain Vickers 6-Ton was intended for export to less technically advanced countries: the Soviet Union, Poland, Brazil, Argentina, Japan, Thailand, China, and many others. Those 7. Tanks portal. Ancient Gauls made by CBG Mignot - A recent ebay extravagance, they're not the sort of thing I collect really, and they all have some damage but then again they are nice early toy soldier In , Turkey purchased 60 T mod. New mechanized brigades, each equipped with T tanks, were also organized at that time.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • M6 Heavy Tank the Newly-Formed Heavy Tank Platoons Are Lieutenant Giving a Good Account of Themselves
    HEAVY TANK PLATOON Lieutenant M6 HEAVY TANK The newly-formed heavy tank platoons are Lieutenant giving a good account of themselves. DEVELOPMENT Heavy Tank Platoons are rated as: Confident Trained At the outbreak of World War II the US Army DESIGN FEATURES possessed few tanks, and no heavy tanks. In OON May 1940 the US Army Ordnance Department When the specifications were laid down PLatooN T for the M6 heavy tank it was normal for Command M6 heavy tank started to work on the T1, 50-ton heavy LA heavy tanks, such as the Soviet T-35, HQ Tank multi-turreted tank. This was similar in 3 M6 heavy tanks ...... 510 points P concept to the Soviet T-35 and other 1930s to follow the ‘land battleship’ model, ‘land battleship’ designs. By October 1940, having multiple turrets mounting a 2 M6 heavy tanks ...... 340 points Sergeant CorporalSergeant the Department reached the same conclusions variety of guns and machine-guns. The 1 M6 heavy tank ....... 170 points of excessive size, difficulty in crew co- T1 heavy tank specification featured a ordination and high production cost that had slightly more modern arrangement with led to the abandonment of the land battleship both of its guns mounted in the same REPLACING StANDARD EQUIPMENT concept in Europe. turret and its twin .50 cal machine- Any US company may replace a Tank Platoon guns in a relatively conventional bow M6 heavy tank M6 heavy tank A new T1 heavy tank design was laid down with mounting. taken as a Support platoon with a Heavy a single turret retaining the mixed armament Tank Platoon.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress in Delivering the British Army's Armoured
    AVF0014 Written evidence submitted by Nicholas Drummond “Progress in Delivering the British Army’s Armoured Vehicle Capability.” Nicholas Drummond Defence Industry Consultant and Commentator Aura Consulting Ltd. ______________________________________________________________________________ _________ Contents Section 1 - Introduction Section 2 - HCDC questions 1. Does the Army have a clear understanding of how it will employ its armoured vehicles in future operations? 2. Given the delays to its programmes, will the Army be able to field the Strike Brigades and an armoured division as envisaged by the 2015 SDSR? 3. How much has the Army spent on procuring armoured vehicles over the last 20 years? How many vehicles has it procured with this funding? 4. What other capabilities has the Army sacrificed in order to fund overruns in its core armoured vehicles programmes? 5. How flexible can the Army be in adapting its current armoured vehicle plans to the results of the Integrated Review? 6. By 2025 will the Army be able to match the potential threat posed by peer adversaries? 7. Is the Army still confident that the Warrior CSP can deliver an effective vehicle capability for the foreseeable future? 8. To what extent does poor contractor performance explain the delays to the Warrior and Ajax programmes? 9. Should the UK have a land vehicles industrial strategy, and if so what benefits would this bring? 10. What sovereign capability for the design and production of armoured vehicles does the UK retain? 11. Does it make sense to upgrade the Challenger 2 when newer, more capable vehicles may be available from our NATO allies? 12. What other key gaps are emerging within the Army’s armoured vehicle capability? 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Projected Acquisition Costs for the Army's Ground Combat Vehicles
    Projected Acquisition Costs for the Army’s Ground Combat Vehicles © MDart10/Shutterstock.com APRIL | 2021 At a Glance The Army operates a fleet of ground combat vehicles—vehicles intended to conduct combat opera- tions against enemy forces—and plans to continue to do so. Expanding on the Army’s stated plans, the Congressional Budget Office has projected the cost of acquiring such vehicles through 2050. Those projections include costs for research, development, test, and evaluation (RDT&E) and for procurement but not the costs of operating and maintaining the vehicles. CBO’s key findings are as follows: • Total acquisition costs for the Army’s ground combat vehicles are projected to average about $5 billion per year (in 2020 dollars) through 2050—$4.5 billion for procurement and $0.5 billion for RDT&E. • The projected procurement costs are greater (in constant dollars) than the average annual cost for such vehicles from 2010 to 2019 but approximately equal to the average annual cost from 2000 to 2019 (when spending was boosted because of operations in Iraq). • More than 40 percent of the projected acquisition costs of Army ground combat vehicles are for Abrams tanks. • Most of the projected acquisition costs are for remanufactured and upgraded versions of current vehicles, though the Army also plans to acquire an Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle, which will replace the Bradley armored personnel carrier; an Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle, which will replace the M113 armored personnel carrier; and a new Mobile Protected Firepower tank, which will be lighter than an Abrams tank. • The Army is also considering developing an unmanned Decisive Lethality Platform that might eventually replace Abrams tanks.
    [Show full text]
  • Errors in American Tank Development in World War II Jacob Fox James Madison University
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Masters Theses The Graduate School Spring 2013 The rW ong track: Errors in American tank development in World War II Jacob Fox James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019 Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Fox, Jacob, "The rW ong track: Errors in American tank development in World War II" (2013). Masters Theses. 215. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019/215 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the The Graduate School at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Wrong Track: Errors in American Tank Development in World War II Jacob Fox A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History May 2013 ii Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................... iii Introduction and Historiography ....................................................................... 1 Chapter One: America’s Pre-War tank Policy and Early War Development ....... 19 McNair’s Tank Destroyers Chapter Two: The Sherman on the Battlefield ................................................. 30 Reaction in the Press Chapter Three: Ordnance Department and the T26 ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download M103 Heavy Tank, 1950-74 Ebook, Epub
    M103 HEAVY TANK, 1950-74 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Kenneth W. Estes,Richard Chasemore | 48 pages | 19 Mar 2013 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9781849089814 | English | United Kingdom M103 Heavy Tank, 1950-74 PDF Book Army tank engineering of the late s. About This Item. Best for. The heavy tank proved fairly popular with its crews, who above all respected the powerful armament it carried. M7 Priest mm Howitzer Motor Carriage. While the US Army deactivated its heavy armor units with the reception of the new M60 series main battle tanks in , the remaining Ms stayed within the US Marine Corps inventory until they began receiving the M60 series main battle tank. Post—World War II armies have shifted to the Main Battle Tank concept, in which a single model is expected to fulfill the breakthrough functions of a heavy tank while retaining the mobility of medium and light tanks. It may have been the unwanted 'ugly duckling' of the Army, which refrained from naming the M alone of all its postwar tanks. The M is a bit of a footnote in the history of US armour. Welcome to Wargaming. Standard US Army armor battalions at the time had three companies per battalion, each with three five-tank platoons, with 17 tanks per company two tanks were in headquarters platoon. The last Ms were withdrawn from service in Walmart Services. Flag as inappropriate. See all related content. Hannie leads a double life, one as a wife and mother in a Devon manor Range A, Camp Pendleton, California. Ask a question Ask a question If you would like to share feedback with us about pricing, delivery or other customer service issues, please contact customer service directly.
    [Show full text]
  • The M1A2 Abrams: the Last Main Battle Tank?
    The M1A2 Abrams: The Last Main Battle Tank? by Stanley C. Crist With its superb integration of fire- Although Longbow Hellfire was de- is expected to enter production around power, mobility, and armor protection, signed for the AH-64D Apache heli- 2015, replacing the M1-series tanks. the M1A2 Abrams is very nearly the copter, there is no obvious reason it Since the next generation armored ultimate incarnation of the main battle couldn’t be fired from an armored ve- fighting vehicle is no longer referred to tank (MBT). Although more advanced hicle. Indeed, at least one nation is ap- as an MBT, can it be inferred that the design concepts have been published in parently developing a similar system. future combat system need not be a recent years, it will likely prove quite According to the August/December tank as we know it today? difficult to produce an MBT suffi- 1993 issue of ASIAN MILITARY RE- If self-guided missiles are chosen for ciently superior (to the M1A2) to jus- VIEW, India has developed the NAG, a tify the cost, so why not look for a bet- fire-and-forget antitank missile with a the primary armament of the FCS, a ter idea? range of six kilometers. It was planned number of advantages present them- that the NAG would be the armament selves. For one, it ought to be possible to eliminate the turret assembly; this The Missile Option for a tracked combat vehicle. With would greatly simplify construction, ground surveillance radar (GSR) incor- When Egyptian Saggers surprised Is- porated into its fire control system, with a corresponding decrease in pro- duction cost and vehicle weight.
    [Show full text]
  • LIBERTY UNIVERSITY Master's Thesis the M26 Pershing
    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY Master’s Thesis The M26 Pershing: America’s Forgotten Tank - Developmental and Combat History Author : Reader : Supervisor : Robert P. Hanger Dr. Christopher J. Smith Dr. David L. Snead A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master’s of Arts In the Liberty University Department of History May 11, 2018 Abstract The M26 tank, nicknamed the “General Pershing,” was the final result of the Ordnance Department’s revolutionary T20 series. It was the only American heavy tank to be fielded during the Second World War. Less is known about this tank, mainly because it entered the war too late and in too few numbers to impact events. However, it proved a sufficient design – capable of going toe-to-toe with vaunted German armor. After the war, American tank development slowed and was reduced mostly to modernization of the M26 and component development. The Korean War created a sudden need for armor and provided the impetus for further development. M26s were rushed to the conflict and demonstrated to be decisive against North Korean armor. Nonetheless, the principle role the tank fulfilled was infantry support. In 1951, the M26 was replaced by its improved derivative, the M46. Its final legacy was that of being the foundation of America’s Cold War tank fleet. Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………..1 Chapter 1. Development of the T26 …………………………………………………..………..10 Chapter 2. The M26 in Action in World War II …………...…………………………………40 Chapter 3. The Interwar Period ……………………………………………………………….63 Chapter 4. The M26 in Korea ………………………………………………………………….76 The Invasion………………………………………………………...………77 Intervention…………………………………………………………………81 The M26 Enters the War……………………………………………………85 The M26 in the Anti-Tank Role…………………………………………….87 Chapter 5.
    [Show full text]
  • France Historical AFV Register
    France Historical AFV Register Armored Fighting Vehicles Preserved in France Updated 24 July 2016 Pierre-Olivier Buan Neil Baumgardner For the AFV Association 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................4 ALSACE.................................................................................................................5 Bas-Rhin / Lower Rhine (67)........................................................5 Haut-Rhin / Upper Rhine (68)......................................................10 AQUITAINE...........................................................................................................12 Dordogne (24) .............................................................................12 Gironde (33) ................................................................................13 Lot-et-Garonne (47).....................................................................14 AUVERGNE............................................................................................................15 Puy-de-Dôme (63)........................................................................15 BASSE-NORMANDIE / LOWER NORMANDY............................................................16 Calvados (14)...............................................................................16 Manche (50).................................................................................19 Orne (61).....................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • The Uncertain Role of the Tank in Modern War: Lessons from the Israeli Experience in Hybrid Warfare
    No. 109 JUNE 2016 The Uncertain Role of the Tank in Modern War: Lessons from the Israeli Experience in Hybrid Warfare Michael B. Kim The Uncertain Role of the Tank in Modern War: Lessons from the Israeli Experience in Hybrid Warfare by Michael B. Kim The Institute of Land Warfare ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY AN INSTITUTE OF LAND WARFARE PAPER The purpose of the Institute of Land Warfare is to extend the educational work of AUSA by sponsoring scholarly publications, to include books, monographs and essays on key defense issues, as well as workshops and symposia. A work selected for publication as a Land Warfare Paper represents research by the author which, in the opinion of ILW’s editorial board, will contribute to a better understanding of a particular defense or national security issue. Publication as an Institute of Land Warfare Paper does not indicate that the Association of the United States Army agrees with everything in the paper but does suggest that the Association believes the paper will stimulate the thinking of AUSA members and others concerned about important defense issues. LAND WARFARE PAPER No. 109, June 2016 The Uncertain Role of the Tank in Modern War: Lessons from the Israeli Experience in Hybrid Warfare by Michael B. Kim Major Michael B. Kim currently serves as the Squadron Executive Officer for the 8th Squadron, 1st Cavalry Regiment, 2d Stryker Brigade Combat Team, 2d Infantry Division. Prior to his current position, he graduated from the Command and General Staff College (CGSC), Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, and completed the Art of War Scholars Program.
    [Show full text]
  • The T-34-85 in Detail
    ASSEMBLY GUIDE STEP 1 THE T-34-85 IN DETAIL The three-man turret on the T-34-85 was one of several significant innovations that greatly enhanced its combat effectiveness in comparison with its earlier versions. Here is a view of the turret seen from above, and this is the part with which you start when you come to assemble the model. he turret roofs on the T-34-85 varied depending on scope. The most important diference between the turret the factory at which they were manufactured. Its designs was the location of the commander’s cupola. T turret armor thickness was 20 mm, as compared to In 1944, cupola production was increased, and the early 16 mm, on, for example, the German “Panther” tank. versions were given a small ledge on the left side of the All T-34-85 roofs had two covers above the ventilators. At turret intended for this cupola. The turret roof took the the end of 1945, one of the ventilators was placed in front form of an armored plate that rotated on a ball bushing. of the loader’s hatch. There were two diferent periscope It comprised two parts, one of which was hinged and able designs: some T-34-85s had a high PTK-5 periscope from to open. On the early version of the T-34, both parts of this 1943, but the majority were equipped with a low MK-4 peri- hatch could be opened. In 1944 this Т-34-85 was equipped with a commander’s cupola, for which a ledge was provided on the side of the turret.
    [Show full text]
  • The Soviet-German Tank Academy at Kama
    The Secret School of War: The Soviet-German Tank Academy at Kama THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Ian Johnson Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2012 Master's Examination Committee: Jennifer Siegel, Advisor Peter Mansoor David Hoffmann Copyright by Ian Ona Johnson 2012 Abstract This paper explores the period of military cooperation between the Weimar Period German Army (the Reichswehr), and the Soviet Union. Between 1922 and 1933, four facilities were built in Russia by the two governments, where a variety of training and technological exercises were conducted. These facilities were particularly focused on advances in chemical and biological weapons, airplanes and tanks. The most influential of the four facilities was the tank testing and training grounds (Panzertruppenschule in the German) built along the Kama River, near Kazan in North- Central Russia. Led by German instructors, the school’s curriculum was based around lectures, war games, and technological testing. Soviet and German students studied and worked side by side; German officers in fact often wore the Soviet uniform while at the school, to show solidarity with their fellow officers. Among the German alumni of the school were many of the most famous practitioners of mobile warfare during the Second World War, such as Guderian, Manstein, Kleist and Model. This system of education proved highly innovative. During seven years of operation, the school produced a number of extremely important technological and tactical innovations. Among the new technologies were a new tank chassis system, superior guns, and - perhaps most importantly- a radio that could function within a tank.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the American Tank-Infantry Team During World War II in Africa and Europe
    Art by Jody Harmon Development of the American Tank-Infantry Team During World War II in Africa and Europe by Captain J. L. Mudd The American tank-infantry team was to destroy antitank weapons, bunkers, and tions, and its weight ranged from 33 to the key maneuver element that led to the unarmored or lightly-armored vehicles.5 almost 36 tons. Typically, the tank car- overwhelming number of tactical suc- When the United States Army entered ried a 75-mm gun, but many were later cesses enjoyed by the United States in the World War II, the two main tanks in its fitted with a 76-mm higher velocity can- Second World War.1 However, this win- arsenal were the M3 light tank and the non. It bristled with bow and coaxial .30- ning combination of men and machines M3 medium tank.6 The Light Tank, M3 caliber machine guns and a flexible tur- had developed throughout the course of Series weighed approximately 14-16 ret-mounted Browning .50 caliber ma- the war, and included a number of varia- tons, depending on the model, and was chine gun for antiaircraft use. Armor on tions based on the theater and areas armed with a 37-mm cannon and up to the turret front was 3.75 inches in effec- within each theater. Original develop- five .30-caliber machine guns. Its thickest tive thickness, while the hull front was ment came from training and lessons effective armor was 1.75 inches on the effectively up to four inches thick.10 learned in the decades between the two turret front and 3 inches on the hull front.
    [Show full text]