DOCSLIB.ORG

CULTIVATION of AMERICAN RAZOR CLAM Screening of Potential for Commercial Cultivation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CULTIVATION of AMERICAN RAZOR CLAM Screening of Potential for Commercial Cultivation Page 1 CULTIVATION OF AMERICAN RAZOR CLAM Screening of potential for commercial cultivation Anna Sofie Lousdal Freudendahl & Mette Moller Nielsen October 2005 Danish Seafood Center Page 2 1.0 Table of Contents .............................................................................................................2 2.0 PREFACE .........................................................................................................................4 3.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................5 PART 1 .................................... ...............................................................................................7 4.0 RESULT TO SAMPLING ................................................................................................8 4.1 Production Phases ..................................................................................................8 4.2 Hatchery Production ..............................................................................................8 4.3 On-growing ...........................................................................................................11 4.4 Market Analysis ...................................................................................................12 4.5 Future focus areas .................................................................................................12 5.0 FFEKTMÅL …….............................................................................................................14 6.0 MARKET ANALYSIS ...................................................................................................16 6.1 Preface .................................................................................................................16 6.2 Market Analysis for razor clams ........................................................................ 17 6.2.1 Introduction ......................................................................................... 17 6.2.2 Market :................................................................................................ 18 6.2.3 Size and quality :.................................................................................. 18 6.2.4 Supply and demand :............................................................................ 18 6.3 The market for razor clams in Spain .................................................................. 19 6.3.1 Summary .............................................................................................. 19 6.3.2 Purpose of investigation ...................................................................... 19 6.3.3 Razor Clams ........................................................................................ 20 6.3.4 Structural Spain .................................................................................... 21 6.4 Supply Situation ................................................................................................... 21 6.4.1 Geographical distribution of catches .....................................................21 6.4.2 Auctions / Grossistled ........................................................................... 22 6.4.3 Conclusion ............................................................................................. 26 6.4.4 Geographical origin of fresh razor clams .............................................. 29 6.4.5 Distribution of retail sales ..................................................................... 29 6.4.6 Demand ................................................................................................. 31 6.4.7 Structure ................................................................................................ 32 6.4.8 Penetration Opportunities ......................................................................32 6.5 Source List ........................................................................................................... 33 6.5.1 Wholesale Markets ................................................................................ 34 6.6 Appendix 1 ........................................................................................................... 36 PART 2 ................................................................................................................................. 39 7.0 PRENTALBESTAND ....................................................................................................40 7.1 Collections .......................................................................................................... 40 7.1.1 Areas .................................................................................................... 40 7.1.2 Procedure .............................................................................................. 40 7.1.3 Runtime Data collected mussels ........................................................... 41 7.2 Parentalkar ........................................................................................................... 42 7.2.1 Sediment Analysis ................................................................................ 43 7.2.2 Physical parameters .............................................................................. 45 8.0 REPRODUKTIVE CYCLE ........................................................................................... 46 8.1 Investigation of gonad development ................................................................... 47 8.1.1 Method for assessing the maturity ....................................................... 47 8.1.2 Conditioning ........................................................................................ 48 8.2 Results ................................................................................................................ 49 8.3 Discussion ........................................................................................................... 53 9.0 Spawning and fertilization .............................................................................................. 56 9.1 Materials and methods ........................................................................................ 56 9.1.1 Results .................................................................................................. 57 9.1.2 Conclusion on results ........................................................................... 59 Page 3 9.2 Discussion ............................................................................................................ 59 10.0 LARVE PRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 62 10.1 Materials and methods ...................................................................................... 62 10.2 Results and Discussion ..................................................................................... 64 11.0 Setting and the subsequent fry stages ............................................................................ 74 11.1 Material and Methods ........................................................................................ 74 11.1.1 Settling material................................................................................... 74 11.1.2 Monitoring ........................................................................................... 74 11.1.3 Hatchery Culture .................................................................................. 75 11.2 Results ................................................................................................................. 76 11.2.1 Morphological development of the fry ................................................. 76 11.2.2 Settling stidspunkt.................................................................................. 78 11.2.3 Survival of fry stages ............................................................................. 78 11.2.4 Growth of fry stages ............................................................................... 79 11.2.5 Density ................................................................................................... 80 11.2.6 11.2.6 Physical parameters .................................................................... 82 11.3 Discussion ............................................................................................................. 82 11.3.1 settling .................................................................................................... 82 11.3.2 Hatchery Behavior ................................................................................ 83 11.3.3 Hatchery Culture ................................................................................. 84 12.0 ON-GROWING IN SUSPENDED SYSTEMS .............................................................. 86 13.0 REFERENCE TO PART 2.............................................................................................. 90 PART 3 ............................................................................................................................... .... 93 14.0 APPENDIX A. - Business Economics ............................................................................ 94 15.0 APPENDIX B. - INTERNATIONALT NETWORK ...................................................... 96 15.1 Meeting held at the Centre for Marine Resources and Mariculture (C-March), Northern Ireland, 26 – 27.October 2004 .............................................................. 96 15.2 Meeting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Morphometry, Growth and Reproduction of an Atlantic Population of the Razor Clam Ensis Macha (Molina, 1782)*
    SCI. MAR., 68 (2): 211-217 SCIENTIA MARINA 2004 Morphometry, growth and reproduction of an Atlantic population of the razor clam Ensis macha (Molina, 1782)* PEDRO J. BARÓN1,2, LUCIANO E. REAL2, NÉSTOR F. CIOCCO1,2 and MARÍA E. RÉ1 1 Centro Nacional Patagónico, CONICET, Boulevard Brown s/n, Puerto Madryn (9120), Chubut, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco, Boulevard Brown 3700, Puerto Madryn (9120), Chubut, Argentina. SUMMARY: Ensis macha is a razor clam distributed throughout the coasts of southern Argentina and Chile. Even though it represents a valuable fishery resource, the exploitation of its Atlantic populations has begun only in recent years. This study provides the first estimates of growth rate, an interpretation of the reproductive cycle on the coast of the northern Argentine Patagonia and an analysis of the species morphometry. Growth was estimated by direct observation of growth rings on the valves by two observers. The reproductive cycle was interpreted by the analysis of temporal change of oocyte size frequency distributions. Parameter estimations for the von Bertalanffy equations respectively obtained by observers 1 -1 and 2 were 154 and 153.7 mm for L∞, 0.25 and 0.20 yr for k, and -0.08 and -0.72 yr for t0. Two spawning peaks were detect- ed: September-November 1999 and May-June 2000. However, mature females were found all year round. An abrupt change in the relationship between shell length and height was detected at 11.2 mm length. Key words: razor clam, morphometric relationships, growth, reproduction, Ensis macha, allometric growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Clams, Cockles, Arkshells Aquaculture Production by Species and Country
    120 Clams, cockles, arkshells Aquaculture production by species and country or area B-56 Clams, coques, arches Production de l'aquaculture par espèce et pays ou zone Q = t Almejas, berberechos, arcas Producción de acuicultura por especie y país o área V = USD 1 000 Species, country Espèce, pays 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Especie, país t t t t t t t t t t Inflated ark ...B ...C Scapharca broughtonii 3,16(04)005,07 ACB Korea Rep 2 548 2 064 3 015 1 903 1 714 1 560 2 110 1 872 2 227 2 921 Species total Q 2 548 2 064 3 015 1 903 1 714 1 560 2 110 1 872 2 227 2 921 V 19 689 18 393 19 277 15 395 13 114 20 839 20 248 18 761 15 995 16 770 Blood cockle Arche granuleuse Arca del Pacífico occidental Anadara granosa 3,16(04)071,01 BLC Cambodia ... ... ... 495 600 F 700 F 800 900 F 1 000 F 1 300 F China 265 673 F 277 768 279 510 290 177 276 742 310 380 293 200 278 058 336 870 353 388 China,Taiwan - - - - - - - - - ... Korea Rep 3 226 5 063 28 372 1 637 2 966 1 155 1 616 2 232 1 590 954 Malaysia 59 521 45 674 49 620 61 138 64 938 78 025 57 544 42 132 F 40 172 F 40 454 Thailand 56 853 65 666 55 671 65 852 81 959 75 611 51 736 66 528 71 325 65 350 Species total Q 385 273 394 171 413 173 419 299 427 205 465 871 404 896 389 850 450 957 461 446 V 386 053 420 311 454 264 466 540 462 657 510 901 483 602 478 526 566 523 580 260 Grand ark Arche pied d'âne Arca casco de burro Anadara grandis 3,16(04)071,07 NDN El Salvador ..
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Windfarm OWEZ on the Local Macrobenthos Communiy
    Impact of windfarm OWEZ on the local macrobenthos community report OWEZ_R_261_T1_20090305 R. Daan, M. Mulder, M.J.N. Bergman Koninklijk Nederlands Instituut voor Zeeonderzoek (NIOZ) This project is carried out on behalf of NoordzeeWind, through a sub contract with Wageningen-Imares Contents Summary and conclusions 3 Introduction 5 Methods 6 Results boxcore 11 Results Triple-D dredge 13 Discussion 16 References 19 Tables 21 Figures 33 Appendix 1 44 Appendix 2 69 Appendix 3 72 Photo’s by Hendricus Kooi 2 Summary and conclusions In this report the results are presented of a study on possible short‐term effects of the construction of Offshore Windfarm Egmond aan Zee (OWEZ) on the composition of the local benthic fauna living in or on top of the sediment. The study is based on a benthic survey carried out in spring 2007, a few months after completion of the wind farm. During this survey the benthic fauna was sampled within the wind farm itself and in 6 reference areas lying north and south of it. Sampling took place mainly with a boxcorer, but there was also a limited programme with a Triple‐D dredge. The occurrence of possible effects was analyzed by comparing characteristics of the macrobenthos within the wind farm with those in the reference areas. A quantitative comparison of these characteristics with those observed during a baseline survey carried out 4 years before was hampered by a difference in sampling design and methodological differences. The conclusions of this study can be summarized as follows: 1. Based on the Bray‐Curtis index for percentage similarity there appeared to be great to very great similarity in the fauna composition of OWEZ and the majority of the reference areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Variations of the Shell of the Bivalve Lucina Pectinata
    I S S N 2 3 47-6 8 9 3 Volume 10 Number2 Journal of Advances in Biology Morphological variations of the shell of the bivalve Lucina pectinata (Gmelin, 1791) Emma MODESTIN PhD of Biogeography, zoology and Ecology University of the French Antilles, UMR AREA DEV ABSTRACT In Martinique, the species Lucina pectinata (Gmelin, 1791) is called "mud clam, white clam or mangrove clam" by bivalve fishermen depending on the harvesting environment. Indeed, the individuals collected have differences as regards the shape and colour of the shell. The hypothesis is that the shape of the shell of L. pectinata (P. pectinatus) shows significant variations from one population to another. This paper intends to verify this hypothesis by means of a simple morphometric study. The comparison of the shape of the shell of individuals from different populations was done based on samples taken at four different sites. The standard measurements (length (L), width or thickness (E - épaisseur) and height (H)) were taken and the morphometric indices (L/H; L/E; E/H) were established. These indices of shape differ significantly among the various populations. This intraspecific polymorphism of the shape of the shell of P. pectinatus could be related to the nature of the sediment (granulometry, density, hardness) and/or the predation. The shells are significantly more elongated in a loose muddy sediment than in a hard muddy sediment or one rich in clay. They are significantly more convex in brackish environments and this is probably due to the presence of more specialised predators or of more muddy sediments. Keywords Lucina pectinata, bivalve, polymorphism of shape of shell, ecology, mangrove swamp, French Antilles.
    [Show full text]
  • A World Dataset on the Geographic Distributions of Solenidae Razor Clams (Mollusca: Bivalvia)
    Biodiversity Data Journal 7: e31375 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.7.e31375 Data Paper A world dataset on the geographic distributions of Solenidae razor clams (Mollusca: Bivalvia) Hanieh Saeedi‡,§,|, Mark J Costello ¶ ‡ Department of Marine Zoology, Crustaceans, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany § Institute for Ecology, Diversity and Evolution, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany | OBIS data manager, deep-sea node, Frankfurt am Main, Germany ¶ Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand Corresponding author: Hanieh Saeedi ([email protected]) Academic editor: Dimitris Poursanidis Received: 05 Nov 2018 | Accepted: 09 Jan 2019 | Published: 31 Jan 2019 Citation: Saeedi H, Costello M (2019) A world dataset on the geographic distributions of Solenidae razor clams (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Biodiversity Data Journal 7: e31375. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.7.e31375 Abstract Background Using this dataset, we examined the global geographical distributions of Solenidae species in relation to their endemicity, species richness and latitudinal ranges and then predicted their distributions under future climate change using species distribution modelling techniques (Saeedi et al. 2016a, Saeedi et al. 2016b). We found that the global latitudinal species richness in Solenidae is bi-modal, dipping at the equator most likely derived by high sea surface temperature (Saeedi et al. 2016b). We also found that most of the Solenidae species will shift their distribution ranges polewards due to global warming (Saeedi et al. 2016a). We also provided a comprehensive review of the taxon to test whether the latitudinal gradient in species richness was uni-modal with a peak in the tropics or northern hemisphere or asymmetric and bimodal as proposed previously (Chaudhary et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Siliqua Patula Class: Bivalvia; Heterodonta Order: Veneroida the Flat Razor Clam Family: Pharidae
    Phylum: Mollusca Siliqua patula Class: Bivalvia; Heterodonta Order: Veneroida The flat razor clam Family: Pharidae Taxonomy: The familial designation of this (see Plate 397G, Coan and Valentich-Scott species has changed frequently over time. 2007). Previously in the Solenidae, current intertidal Body: (see Plate 29 Ricketts and Calvin guides include S. patula in the Pharidae (e.g., 1952; Fig 259 Kozloff 1993). Coan and Valentich-Scott 2007). The superfamily Solenacea includes infaunal soft Color: bottom dwelling bivalves and contains the two Interior: (see Fig 5, Pohlo 1963). families: Solenidae and Pharidae (= Exterior: Cultellidae, von Cosel 1993) (Remacha- Byssus: Trivino and Anadon 2006). In 1788, Dixon Gills: described S. patula from specimens collected Shell: The shell in S. patula is thin and with in Alaska (see Range) and Conrad described sharp (i.e., razor-like) edges and a thin profile the same species, under the name Solen (Fig. 4). Thin, long, fragile shell (Ricketts and nuttallii from specimens collected in the Calvin 1952), with gapes at both ends Columbia River in 1838 (Weymouth et al. (Haderlie and Abbott 1980). Shell smooth 1926). These names were later inside and out (Dixon 1789), elongate, rather synonymized, thus known synonyms for cylindrical and the length is about 2.5 times Siliqua patula include Solen nuttallii, the width. Solecurtus nuttallii. Occasionally, researchers Interior: Prominent internal vertical also indicate a subspecific epithet (e.g., rib extending from beak to margin (Haderlie Siliqua siliqua patula) or variations (e.g., and Abbott 1980). Siliqua patula var. nuttallii, based on rib Exterior: Both valves are similar and morphology, see Possible gape at both ends.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Final LOFF W/ Ref and Detailed Info
    Final List of Foreign Fisheries Rationale for Classification ** (Presence of mortality or injury (P/A), Co- Occurrence (C/O), Company (if Source of Marine Mammal Analogous Gear Fishery/Gear Number of aquaculture or Product (for Interactions (by group Marine Mammal (A/G), No RFMO or Legal Target Species or Product Type Vessels processor) processing) Area of Operation or species) Bycatch Estimates Information (N/I)) Protection Measures References Detailed Information Antigua and Barbuda Exempt Fisheries http://www.fao.org/fi/oldsite/FCP/en/ATG/body.htm http://www.fao.org/docrep/006/y5402e/y5402e06.htm,ht tp://www.tradeboss.com/default.cgi/action/viewcompan lobster, rock, spiny, demersal fish ies/searchterm/spiny+lobster/searchtermcondition/1/ , (snappers, groupers, grunts, ftp://ftp.fao.org/fi/DOCUMENT/IPOAS/national/Antigua U.S. LoF Caribbean spiny lobster trap/ pot >197 None documented, surgeonfish), flounder pots, traps 74 Lewis Fishing not applicable Antigua & Barbuda EEZ none documented none documented A/G AndBarbuda/NPOA_IUU.pdf Caribbean mixed species trap/pot are category III http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/fisheries/tabl lobster, rock, spiny free diving, loops 19 Lewis Fishing not applicable Antigua & Barbuda EEZ none documented none documented A/G e2/Atlantic_GOM_Caribbean_shellfish.html Queen conch (Strombus gigas), Dive (SCUBA & free molluscs diving) 25 not applicable not applicable Antigua & Barbuda EEZ none documented none documented A/G U.S. trade data Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean snapper- handline, hook and grouper and other reef fish bottom longline/hook-and-line/ >5,000 snapper line 71 Lewis Fishing not applicable Antigua & Barbuda EEZ none documented none documented N/I, A/G U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Bulletin 161. California Marine Fish Landings for 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California
    UC San Diego Fish Bulletin Title Fish Bulletin 161. California Marine Fish Landings For 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/93g734v0 Authors Pinkas, Leo Gates, Doyle E Frey, Herbert W Publication Date 1974 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME FISH BULLETIN 161 California Marine Fish Landings For 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California By Leo Pinkas Marine Resources Region and By Doyle E. Gates and Herbert W. Frey > Marine Resources Region 1974 1 Figure 1. Geographical areas used to summarize California Fisheries statistics. 2 3 1. CALIFORNIA MARINE FISH LANDINGS FOR 1972 LEO PINKAS Marine Resources Region 1.1. INTRODUCTION The protection, propagation, and wise utilization of California's living marine resources (established as common property by statute, Section 1600, Fish and Game Code) is dependent upon the welding of biological, environment- al, economic, and sociological factors. Fundamental to each of these factors, as well as the entire management pro- cess, are harvest records. The California Department of Fish and Game began gathering commercial fisheries land- ing data in 1916. Commercial fish catches were first published in 1929 for the years 1926 and 1927. This report, the 32nd in the landing series, is for the calendar year 1972. It summarizes commercial fishing activities in marine as well as fresh waters and includes the catches of the sportfishing partyboat fleet. Preliminary landing data are published annually in the circular series which also enumerates certain fishery products produced from the catch.
    [Show full text]
  • Shell Morphology and Sperm Ultrastructure of Solen Tehuelchus Hanley, 1842 (Bivalvia: Solenidae): New Taxonomic Characters Author(S): Amanda Bonini, Gisele O
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Repositorio da Producao Cientifica e Intelectual da Unicamp Shell Morphology and Sperm Ultrastructure of Solen tehuelchus Hanley, 1842 (Bivalvia: Solenidae): New Taxonomic Characters Author(s): Amanda Bonini, Gisele O. Introíni Lenita F. Tallarico, Fabrizio M. Machado and Shirlei M. Recco-Pimentel Source: American Malacological Bulletin, 34(2):73-78. Published By: American Malacological Society https://doi.org/10.4003/006.034.0202 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.4003/006.034.0202 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Amer. Malac. Bull. 34(2): 73–78 (2016) RESEARCH NOTE Shell morphology and sperm ultrastructure of Solen tehuelchus Hanley, 1842 (Bivalvia: Solenidae): New taxonomic characters Amanda Bonini1, Gisele O. Introíni1, 3, Lenita F. Tallarico1, Fabrizio M. Machado2 and Shirlei M. Recco-Pimentel1 1Departamento de Biologia Estrutural e Funcional, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Rua Charles Darwin, s/n.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Shell Shape Variation As an Assessment Tool in The
    Fisheries Research 186 (2017) 216–222 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Fisheries Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fishres Use of shell shape variation as an assessment tool in the southernmost razor clam fishery a,b,∗ c,d c Federico Márquez , M. Magdalena Trivellini , Silvina Van der Molen a LARBIM, IBIOMAR − CONICET, Blvd. Brown 2915 (U9120ACD), Puerto Madryn, Argentina b Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco, Blvd. Brown 3100, Puerto Madryn (U9120ACD), Chubut, Argentina c IBIOMAR − CONICET, Blvd. Brown 2915 (U9120ACD), Puerto Madryn, Argentina d Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Av. Vélez Sarsfield 299, Córdoba (×5000JJC), Córdoba, Argentina a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Morphological variation provides a method for phenotypic stock differentiation at inter- and intra- Received 25 April 2016 specific levels. Various methods are used for the assessment of fishery stocks in mollusks; one of them is Received in revised form 25 August 2016 geometric morphometrics. We analyzed morphological variation in razor clams at ten fishing grounds, Accepted 26 August 2016 five from the Argentinean North Patagonian gulfs and five from Chile, and evaluated the occurrence of Handled by A.E. Punt phenotypic stocks between Argentinean and Chilean fisheries, using geometric morphometrics methods. The Argentinean harvesting of Ensis macha is emerging, and represents a way to diversify the shell- Keywords: fisheries in north Patagonia. Nevertheless, fishing and aquaculture play important roles for the Chilean Phenotypic stock Landmarks economy. Various multivariate methods were applied to describe the differences among and between fishing grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Os Nomes Galegos Dos Moluscos 2020 2ª Ed
    Os nomes galegos dos moluscos 2020 2ª ed. Citación recomendada / Recommended citation: A Chave (20202): Os nomes galegos dos moluscos. Xinzo de Limia (Ourense): A Chave. https://www.achave.ga /wp!content/up oads/achave_osnomesga egosdos"mo uscos"2020.pd# Fotografía: caramuxos riscados (Phorcus lineatus ). Autor: David Vilasís. $sta o%ra est& su'eita a unha licenza Creative Commons de uso a%erto( con reco)ecemento da autor*a e sen o%ra derivada nin usos comerciais. +esumo da licenza: https://creativecommons.org/ icences/%,!nc-nd/-.0/deed.g . Licenza comp eta: https://creativecommons.org/ icences/%,!nc-nd/-.0/ ega code. anguages. 1 Notas introdutorias O que cont!n este documento Neste recurso léxico fornécense denominacións para as especies de moluscos galegos (e) ou europeos, e tamén para algunhas das especies exóticas máis coñecidas (xeralmente no ámbito divulgativo, por causa do seu interese científico ou económico, ou por seren moi comúns noutras áreas xeográficas) ! primeira edición d" Os nomes galegos dos moluscos é do ano #$%& Na segunda edición (2$#$), adicionáronse algunhas especies, asignáronse con maior precisión algunhas das denominacións vernáculas galegas, corrixiuse algunha gralla, rema'uetouse o documento e incorporouse o logo da (have. )n total, achéganse nomes galegos para *$+ especies de moluscos A estrutura )n primeiro lugar preséntase unha clasificación taxonómica 'ue considera as clases, ordes, superfamilias e familias de moluscos !'uí apúntanse, de maneira xeral, os nomes dos moluscos 'ue hai en cada familia ! seguir
    [Show full text]
  • Molluscs Gastropods
    Group/Genus/Species Family/Common Name Code SHELL FISHES MOLLUSCS GASTROPODS Dentalium Dentaliidae 4500 D . elephantinum Elephant Tusk Shell 4501 D . javanum 4502 D. aprinum 4503 D. tomlini 4504 D. mannarense 450A D. elpis 450B D. formosum Formosan Tusk Shell 450C Haliotis Haliotidae 4505 H. varia Variable Abalone 4506 H. rufescens Red Abalone 4507 H. clathrata Lovely Abalone 4508 H. diversicolor Variously Coloured Abalone 4509 H. asinina Donkey'S Ear Abalone 450G H. planata Planate Abalone 450H H. squamata Scaly Abalone 450J Cellana Nacellidae 4510 C. radiata radiata Rayed Wheel Limpet 4511 C. radiata cylindrica Rayed Wheel Limpet 4512 C. testudinaria Common Turtle Limpet 4513 Diodora Fissurellidae 4515 D. clathrata Key-Hole Limpets 4516 D. lima 4517 D. funiculata Funiculata Limpet 4518 D. singaporensis Singapore Key-Hole Limpet 4519 D. lentiginosa 451A D. ticaonica 451B D. subquadrata 451C Page 1 of 15 Group/Genus/Species Family/Common Name Code D. pileopsoides 451D Trochus Trochidae 4520 T. radiatus Radiate Top 4521 T. pustulosus 4522 T. stellatus Stellate Trochus 4523 T. histrio 4524 T. maculatus Maculated Top 452A T. niloticus Commercial Top 452B Umbonium Trochidae 4525 U. vestiarium Common Button Top 4526 Turbo Turbinidae 4530 T. marmoratus Great Green Turban 4531 T. intercostalis Ribbed Turban Snail 4532 T. brunneus Brown Pacific Turban 4533 T. argyrostomus Silver-Mouth Turban 4534 T. petholatus Cat'S Eye Turban 453A Nerita Neritidae 4535 N. chamaeleon Chameleon Nerite 4536 N. albicilla Ox-Palate Nerite 4537 N. polita Polished Nerite 4538 N. plicata Plicate Nerite 4539 N. undata Waved Nerite 453E Littorina Littorinidae 4540 L. scabra Rough Periwinkle 4541 L.
    [Show full text]