Campaigning for Authenticity Erica J

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Campaigning for Authenticity Erica J University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Fall 2010 Campaigning for authenticity Erica J. Seifert University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation Seifert, Erica J., "Campaigning for authenticity" (2010). Doctoral Dissertations. 522. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/522 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CAMPAIGNING FOR AUTHENTICITY BY ERICA J. SEIFERT BA, Skidmore College, 2002 DISSERTATION Submitted to the University of New Hampshire in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History September, 2010 UMI Number: 3430776 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT Dissertation Publishing UMI 3430776 Copyright 2010 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 This dissertation has been examined and approved. Dissertation Director, Kur|ifT)ors«y, Associate Professor of History iTucy E. Salyer, Associate Professor of Histo^ J. INj/mam Harris, Professor of History lien F^patrMOPr©fessfc» of History Andrew E. Smith, AssociateProfessor of Political Science (l •O^*--/ ^«-1 c? Date DEDICATION For my father, who raised me on a heartbreaking combination of Democratic politics and Red Sox baseball and for my mother, who suffered the consequences. 111 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was supported by a fellowship from the University of New Hampshire Department of History. This dissertation was edited with the help of many patient and eagle-eyed readers: Kurk Dorsey, Aaron Shaw, Stanley Olson, Diana Seifert, Gretchen Seifert, and Charles Seifert. Ellen Fitzpatrick, Andrew Smith, Lucy Salyer, Bill Harris, and Kurk Dorsey provided cogent insight and generous criticism. This project was achieved despite the herculean distraction techniques of friends and colleagues. These thanks belong exclusively to The Wednesday Club. Kurk, Molly, Luke, and Nick Dorsey provided advice, support, and laughter throughout this process. Thank you. Finally, I am grateful to those who made it worth the effort: Diana Seifert and Nathan Olson. IV ABSTRACT CAMPAIGNING FOR AUTHENTICITY, 1976-2000 by Erica J Seifert University of New Hampshire, September, 2010 In the fall of 1976 Jimmy Carter wanted to be "an American President... who is not isolated from our people, but a President who feels your pain and who shares your dreams." With humble, hopeful, homey images of Plains, Georgia, campaign advertisements sold Carter as a fresh-off-the-farm, peanut-picking Cincinnatus—an authentic American to whom voters could relate. Authenticity became increasingly important to candidate selection in the late twentieth century for multiple reasons. As a priority of the Babyboom Generation, the value of authenticity informed Americans' relationships to own another and evaluations of their cultural products. Political and cultural upheaval resulting from Vietnam and Watergate challenged Americans' trust in politicians and campaign politics; resulting structural reforms transformed presidential nomination and election processes. The growth of soft news, human interest, and television talk shows required candidates to become personally available in order to connect with voters intimately. This dissertation examines the role of candidate image in recent American presidential elections, focusing on the dominant cultural vocabulary of authenticity. While partisan affiliation, ideology, and economic trends were all essential determinants of election outcomes between 1976 and 2000, no one theme permeated campaign discourse more than authenticity. The bulk of this dissertation is devoted to analyzing the ways in which symbols of authenticity operated during specific election cycles. Although cultural vocabulary evolved between 1976 and 2000, several core themes dominated campaign rhetoric: colloquial language and dress, personal narrative and self-disclosure, and anti-elitism. In defining these authenticities, the project also explores negative constructions of inauthenticity associated with the "flip-flop," the Beltway elite, the Ivy League, and the Northeast. Each chapter examines a single general election season to uncover the ways in which Americans assimilated candidate images during that cycle. By examining televised and printed news, commentary, and comedy, along with political polls, campaign documents, manuscript collections, and political advertisements, this dissertation argues that Americans privileged campaign narratives that were authentically representative of themselves and their country. VI TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv ABSTRACT v CHAPTER PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 I. PLAINS SPOKEN 62 JIMMY WHO? 67 THE EVOLUTION OF JERRY FORD 89 II. THERE YOU GO AGAIN 105 "THESE LAST FEW HOURS IN MY LIFE" 109 THE CREATIVE MANAGEMENT OF RONALD REAGAN 128 III. MORNING IN AMERICA 149 "YOU MAY HAVE HEARD OF ME..." 156 GOING TO THE MOVIES 171 IV. BELGIAN ENDIVES, QUICHE OUT OF A CAN 189 BUSHWHACKED 198 THE DUKE 214 V. THE MAN FROM HOPE 233 READ MY LIPS 241 PHIL AND BILL 254 VI. HOPE FLOATS 273 BELTWAY BOB 282 vii TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT'D) IN THE KITCHEN WITH BILL 298 VII. HANGING CHAD 308 BEING AL GORE 317 JUST PLAIN FOLK 332 CONCLUSION 345 BIBLIOGRAPHY 354 vm INTRODUCTION REAL AMERICA When the gun-toting, moose-hunting, flag-waving, snowmobile-driving, hockey mom, Sarah Palin, emerged in August 2008, her personal appeal created a cult-like following. Both critics and advocates deemed her "authentic." Between dropped g's, vernacular references, and colloquial aphorisms, she came to define "authenticity" in populist anti-Washington, anti-east, anti-elite rhetoric. "We believe that the best of America is not all in Washington, D.C.. .We believe that the best of America is in these small towns.. .of what I call the real America." To Palin, the election was not merely a contest for the Presidency, but a great battle between representations of small town "real America" and its elitist enemies in Washington. Although she became the most notable "authentic" national candidate, Sarah Palin presented only the last in a long line of just- like-you narratives in 2008. Each candidate peddled authenticity at one point or another during the 2008 election cycle. Mike Huckabee gained national legitimacy after his meteoric rise in Iowa on the coattails of a southern accent and a holy-rolling, family values personal narrative. Hillary Clinton reemerged only after a New Hampshire sobfest suddenly humanized and personalized her campaign struggle, which had been deemed "robotic" by her critics. By his own admission, John McCain meant to capitalize on the "straight talk" brand he had created during his 2000 bid for the presidency. When Barack Obama announced his choice for Vice President, Joe Biden immediately branded himself as one of us: "Ladies and gentlemen, your kitchen table is like mine. You sit there at night.. .You talk about how much you are worried about being able to pay the bills."1 Biden appealed to voters on a visceral level—he did not merely look out for the average guy's interests, he was the average guy. Although a long-serving Senator, Biden emphasized the fact that he had never lived in Washington, packaging himself as a blue-collar working class kid from Scranton. Where Biden might have highlighted his many legislative accomplishments, he chose instead to share heartwarming stories about hard knocks and kitchen tables. Biden, like Palin, was not only attempting to define himself, but also to define the boundaries of "real America." Although the 2008 election gave the American people an endless stream of "authentic" personal narratives, this brand of American politics was not unique to the most recent campaign season. Its symbolic impulse can be located in the founding debates over democracy versus republicanism and in the "Man from Libertyville" style campaign commercials of the 1950s.3 More recently, the quest for a plain-spoken, 1 Joseph Biden, Aug. 23, 2008, Springfield, 111. 2 It would be tempting to argue that the "boundaries of 'real America'" were drawn politically. In recent years, conservatism has become a popular topic for historians, sociologists, and political scientists. This dissertation takes a decidedly anti-ideological approach. While popular discourse, election results, and the American National Election Studies survey data all indicate a rise in conservatism in the second half of the twentieth century, I contend that, regardless of the popularity of conservative ideas, conservatives have been more adept at adopting the cultural language of "real America." In this way, the boundaries of "real America" were not merely ideological, but rather drawn geographically, culturally, and socio- economically.
Recommended publications
  • ANNUAL REPORT 1998-1999 JUSTIN GUARIGLIA Children Along the Streets of Jakarta, Indonesia, Welcome President and Mrs
    M E S S A G E F R O M J I M M Y C A R T E R ANNUAL REPORT 1998-1999 JUSTIN GUARIGLIA Children along the streets of Jakarta, Indonesia, welcome President and Mrs. Carter. WAGING PEACE ★ FIGHTING DISEASE ★ BUILDING HOPE The Carter Center One Copenhill Atlanta, GA 30307 (404) 420-5100 Fax (404) 420-5145 www.cartercenter.org THE CARTER CENTER A B O U T T H E C A R T E R C E N T E R C A R T E R C E N T E R B O A R D O F T R U S T E E S T H E C A R T E R C E N T E R M I S S I O N S T A T E M E N T Located in Atlanta, The Carter Center is governed by its board of trustees. Chaired by President Carter, with Mrs. Carter as vice chair, the board The Carter Center oversees the Center’s assets and property, and promotes its objectives and goals. Members include: The Carter Center, in partnership with Emory University, is guided by a fundamental houses offices for Jimmy and Rosalynn commitment to human rights and the alleviation of human suffering; it seeks to prevent and Jimmy Carter Robert G. Edge Kent C. “Oz” Nelson Carter and most of Chair Partner Retired Chair and CEO resolve conflicts, enhance freedom and democracy, and improve health. the Center’s program Alston & Bird United Parcel Service of America staff, who promote Rosalynn Carter peace and advance Vice Chair Jane Fonda Charles B.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court and the Presidency, Transcript 1
    Ref#: FDRTR-01 FDR Presidential Library / FDR Library Transcriptions page 1 of 25 As Given / Session 1 Cynthia M. Koch: Ladies and Gentlemen, the President of the United States. Franklin D. Roosevelt: Tonight, sitting at my desk in the White House, I make my first radio report to the people in my second term of office. I want to talk with you very simply tonight about the need for present action, the need to meet the unanswered challenge of one-third of a nation ill-nourished, ill-clad, ill-housed. The Courts, however, have cast doubts on the ability of the elected Congress to protect us against catastrophe by meeting squarely our modern social and economic conditions. In the last four years the sound rule of giving statutes the benefit of all reasonable doubt has been cast aside. The Court has been acting not as a judicial body, but as a policy-making body. We have, therefore, reached the point as a nation where we must take action to save the Constitution from the Court and the Court from itself. What is my proposal? It is simply this: whenever a Judge or Justice of any Federal Court has reached the age of seventy and does not avail himself of the opportunity to retire on a pension, a new member shall be appointed by the President then in office, with the approval, as required by the Constitution, of the Senate of the United States. This plan will save our national Constitution from hardening of the judicial arteries. Those opposing the plan have sought to arouse prejudice and fear by crying that I am seeking to "pack" the Supreme Court and that a baneful precedent will be established.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Interaction with the Public in Emergency Situations: Four Case Studies
    MEDIA INTERACTION WITH THE PUBLIC IN EMERGENCY SITUATIONS: FOUR CASE STUDIES A Report Prepared under an Interagency Agreement by the Federal Research Division, Library of Congress August 1999 Authors: LaVerle Berry Amanda Jones Terence Powers Project Manager: Andrea M. Savada Federal Research Division Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 20540–4840 Tel: 202–707–3900 Fax: 202–707–3920 E-Mail: [email protected] Homepage:http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/ PREFACE The following report provides an analysis of media coverage of four major emergency situations in the United States and the impact of that coverage on the public. The situations analyzed are the Three Mile Island nuclear accident (1979), the Los Angeles riots (1992), the World Trade Center bombing (1993), and the Oklahoma City bombing (1995). Each study consists of a chronology of events followed by a discussion of the interaction of the media and the public in that particular situation. Emphasis is upon the initial hours or days of each event. Print and television coverage was analyzed in each study; radio coverage was analyzed in one instance. The conclusion discusses several themes that emerge from a comparison of the role of the media in these emergencies. Sources consulted appear in the bibliography at the end of the report. i TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ................................................................... i INTRODUCTION: THE MEDIA IN EMERGENCY SITUATIONS .................... iv THE THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR ACCIDENT, 1979 ..........................1 Chronology of Events, March
    [Show full text]
  • Nominations Submitted to the Senate
    Administration of George W. Bush, 2005 27 Government to discuss the upcoming elec- he met with Chairman Connie Mack and tions in Iraq. He then had an intelligence Vice Chairman John B. Breaux of the Presi- briefing. dent’s Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform Later in the morning, the President trav- and Secretary of the Treasury John W. Snow. eled to Collinsville, IL, arriving in the after- Later in the morning, the President trav- noon. Upon arrival, he met with USA Free- eled to Clinton Township, MI, arriving in the dom Corps volunteer Connie Bergmann. afternoon. While en route aboard Air Force Later in the afternoon, the President re- One, he had a telephone conversation with turned to Washington, DC. U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John The President announced his intention to C. Danforth to discuss the situation in Sudan. name Claude A. Allen as Assistant to the Upon arrival in Clinton Township, the Presi- President for Domestic Policy. dent met with USA Freedom Corps volun- The President announced that he has teer Don Kotchman. named Daniel Bartlett as Counselor to the Later in the afternoon, the President re- President. turned to Washington, DC. The President announced that he has The President announced his intention to named Nicolle Devenish as Assistant to the appoint the following individuals as members President for Communications. of the President’s Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform: Connie Mack III (Chairman); January 6 John B. Breaux (Vice Chairman); William In the morning, the President had a tele- Eldridge Frenzel; Elizabeth Garrett; Edward phone conversation with President Mikheil P.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Reelism: a Rhetorical Criticism of Reflection and Interpretation in Political Films
    POLITICAL REELISM: A RHETORICAL CRITICISM OF REFLECTION AND INTERPRETATION IN POLITICAL FILMS Jennifer Lee Walton A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2006 Committee: John J. Makay, Advisor Richard Gebhardt Graduate Faculty Representative John T. Warren Alberto Gonzalez ii ABSTRACT John J. Makay, Advisor The purpose of this study is to discuss how political campaigns and politicians have been depicted in films, and how the films function rhetorically through the use of core values. By interpreting real life, political films entertain us, perhaps satirically poking fun at familiar people and events. However, the filmmakers complete this form of entertainment through the careful integration of American values or through the absence of, or attack on those values. This study provides a rhetorical criticism of movies about national politics, with a primary focus on the value judgments, political consciousness and political implications surrounding the films Mr. Smith Goes to Washington (1939), The Candidate (1972), The Contender (2000), Wag the Dog (1997), Power (1986), and Primary Colors (1998). iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank everyone who made this endeavor possible. First and foremost, I thank Doctor John J. Makay; my committee chair, for believing in me from the start, always encouraging me to do my best, and assuring me that I could do it. I could not have done it without you. I wish to thank my committee members, Doctors John Warren and Alberto Gonzalez, for all of your support and advice over the past months.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Americanism and the Rise of World Opinion: Consequences for the US National Interest Monti Narayan Datta Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-03232-3 - Anti-Americanism and the Rise of World Opinion: Consequences for the US National Interest Monti Narayan Datta Index More information Index Adidas-Salomon legitimacy of 45, 57, 80 comparative consumer study 84–9 and overseas image 191–3 European sales 88 and public diplomacy 191–3 Afghanistan relaxation 4 American foreign policy 4 and tourism 3–4 ISAF (International Security Assistance and unilateralism 3, 8–9, 36–7 Force) 4, 160–70 and world opinion 191 Obama effect on war 159–70 American national interest support for United States 20, 159–63 and anti-Americanism 13–15 troop contributions to ISAF 164–8 and decision-makers 13 troops variable 162–70 measurement of 13–14 alliance variable 64, 72, 77, 80, 133–7 policy objectives in 13–14 America American overseas wars, support for attention to interests of other countries 15–17, 146–7 see also coalition 35 support; First Gulf War (1991); Iraq credit rating 182 war (2003) culture, and anti-Americanism 3, 6, 10, American unipolarity/multipolarity 37–8, 112–14 175, 187 declining world status 181–3 American voters 23 economic power 185 analytic framework description 15–18 exceptionalism 45–6 anti-Bushism, 131–2, 149 see also Bush favorable opinions toward 62, 152, anti-great powerism 187–90 194–229 Arab public opinion 26–7 financial status 182–3 Arab Street 26 Gulf wars costs 119–26 Argentina higher education 108, 185–7 on Iraq war 145–6 innovation, and economic strength 185 on Obama effect 172 military spending 185 Armitage, Richard 57 multilateralism
    [Show full text]
  • George H.W. Bush, "Speech at Penn State University" (23 September 1992)
    Voices of Democracy 2 (2007): 126‐151 Hogan & Mehltretter 126 GEORGE H.W. BUSH, "SPEECH AT PENN STATE UNIVERSITY" (23 SEPTEMBER 1992) J. Michael Hogan and Sara Ann Mehltretter Pennsylvania State University Abstract: During the 1992 presidential campaign, President George H. W. Bush lost a lead in the polls and subsequently the presidency to Bill Clinton. This study helps to account for that loss by illuminating weaknesses in his campaign stump speech. Bush's speech at Penn State University reflected his difficulties in distinguishing himself from his challenger and articulating a vision for his second term. The essay also illustrates larger controversies over politics and free speech on campus. Key Words: 1992 presidential election, George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, campaign speeches, free speech on campus, Penn State University On September 23, 1992, President George H.W. Bush brought his reelection campaign to the University Park campus of the Pennsylvania State University. Speaking on the steps of Old Main to a cheering crowd of supporters, Bush said little new in the speech. Yet it still proved controversial, not so much because of what Bush said, but because of the way the event was staged. Sparking controversy over the distribution of tickets and the treatment of protestors at the event, Bush's appearance dramatized the difficulties of staging campaign events at colleges and universities. It also raised larger issues about politics and free speech on campus. Bush's speech at Penn State was carefully prepared and vetted by his speech‐ writing staff and White House advisers. Yet despite all the effort that went into the speech, it was vague, uninspired, and unresponsive to criticisms of his administration, reflecting the larger problems with Bush's faltering campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • White House Transition Interview
    White House Interview Program DATE: December 29, 1999 INTERVIEWEE: GERALD RAFSHOON INTERVIEWER: Martha Kumar [Disc 1 of 1] MK: When you’d like to go off-the-record or on-background, that’s fine as well. Ultimately the material goes into a presidential library; it will go into the [Jimmy] Carter Library. We’re working with the National Archives on it. The full interviews don’t come out publicly until 2001, when a new President comes in, and also you’ve had a chance to go over the transcript. GR: Okay. MK: It’s going to be used in various ways. It’s a group of presidency scholars and we’re doing profiles of seven offices. We’ve selected seven offices. And we’ll go back over time to the [Richard] Nixon administration, and profile what the functions have been, the responsibilities, different ways in which they’ve been organized. I’m writing the one by myself on communications. I’m doing press and communications by myself. The pieces themselves are going to be short, although they’ll be on a pass-coded website for people coming in so they can then⎯in addition to reading the fifteen pages about some of the general things about the office⎯they’ll be able to select items within it as well. We’ll have links in to longer pieces. And then we’re doing what we call “Standards of a Successful Start” in the spring, which are isolating maybe eight elements that are common to successful transitions. GR: Interesting. Did you read Bob Woodward's latest book, Shadow: Five Presidents and the Legacy of Watergate? MK: Yes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Talk Radio and Its Impact on Politics and Public Policy
    Mount Rushmore: The Rise of Talk Radio and Its Impact on Politics and Public Policy Brian Asher Rosenwald Wynnewood, PA Master of Arts, University of Virginia, 2009 Bachelor of Arts, University of Pennsylvania, 2006 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Virginia August, 2015 !1 © Copyright 2015 by Brian Asher Rosenwald All Rights Reserved August 2015 !2 Acknowledgements I am deeply indebted to the many people without whom this project would not have been possible. First, a huge thank you to the more than two hundred and twenty five people from the radio and political worlds who graciously took time from their busy schedules to answer my questions. Some of them put up with repeated follow ups and nagging emails as I tried to develop an understanding of the business and its political implications. They allowed me to keep most things on the record, and provided me with an understanding that simply would not have been possible without their participation. When I began this project, I never imagined that I would interview anywhere near this many people, but now, almost five years later, I cannot imagine the project without the information gleaned from these invaluable interviews. I have been fortunate enough to receive fellowships from the Fox Leadership Program at the University of Pennsylvania and the Corcoran Department of History at the University of Virginia, which made it far easier to complete this dissertation. I am grateful to be a part of the Fox family, both because of the great work that the program does, but also because of the terrific people who work at Fox.
    [Show full text]
  • Container 108 To
    3/1/79 Folder Citation: Collection: Office of Staff Secretary; Series: Presidential Files; Folder: 3/1/79; Container 108 To See Complete Finding Aid: http://www.jimmycarterlibrary.gov/library/findingaids/Staff_Secretary.pdf 11,.-JX '.�tv-Me )IK�;J.:/ -/-/; J�;t. ·· • ' ' I' J 0 " ' ·,.. : ,. ' 0 > rffir1 ,, .�.- •, :• • ' ' � 0 " ,J<> � � ' () .. '' . -. •.,, > 0 .... '., ,· " ' I� ',I I" .. -�-· , , . ' '' ' . " ,,, 't ,, .'1>" ' ; . ,· '· '\•,, ,, o' "·o . ' . ": .. i :,<> ' ,, , ·� , ' '8 . .. ... ;. 0 .. ... " ., � ... .• o . � "' '0 b' ' , "l . ·"!.· : <> .!!'•. ·.• o', ·: J,�"';p'.·j ., ,. :'e: "�.. r, j(::· " 0 ' 0',g a• \"· a•t• • ,'!· . , .' � �t;J.�. ,'II . · ! ,, �· 0a; � �"w ,t.· , ·� '· . • �P �· .,· .... o-. ",o RESTRICTION c·ooES , , , '', ' ':' ' �,·.. t''-to"'" " •' �� ".� ' ,, "'d >();', •. 0 •'., '',t 1 " , , . O <o �'fl0> ·� ' , ('A { Ciosed by Executive Ord;;;>1235 i3'governing access to national s�urlt;��formation. ' (Bf Closed by statute or by the agency, which originated the <;loc_ument, ,. (C) Closed in.accordance with restrictions,contained•in the donof's deed of gift ·<> .• , 0 • ' ·��! �,�•�·" ' "•� . 0 . �: :t ",./. c ' �' ,. ' ";' :(•: . •• ��· n.al �·��--; . .... ' �: •• ,· • ' , NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND R�CORDS. ADMINIST�A TION' " � 0 ,• ' !" , ..., .] - h '' •', ·' 't.·fl ';. � 1' THE PRESIDENT'S SCHEDULE Thursday - March 1, 1979 8:30 Governor Reubiri Askew. (Mr. Stuart Eizenstat). ( 5 min.-) _The Oval Office. 9:00 Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski The Oval Office. 9:30 Mr. Frank Moore •rhe Oval Office. 10:15 -Mr. Jody Powell The Oval Office. 11:00 Preseritation of Diplomatic Credentials. {25 min.) (Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski) - The Oval O�fice. .'; .. 12:30. Lunch with Ms� �osalynn Carter - Oval Office. -��; - ··:/ . · 'li: . {�( . .� . , ;�!. THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON J>-/-71 LHeA' e Zj_ f.t Fo( � ..f.l _ - J;JP/tl!f��v: ...,__4t ,;14,� � ,L �� tt;) �j,.,._ /� tJ 4./��1� h?M�� : e) �£eJ, .:r,..._, -+o �LD - �/-¥_z;: I ,/; Zc:.
    [Show full text]
  • E.XTENSIONS of REMARKS WE MUST CHANGE OUR WAYS Oil Exports Will Return to the Previous Level Abroad, and to Reduce Our Per Capita
    8690 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS April 25, 1979 James Vanlangen Alan M. Weigel Michael L. William- Devertt D. Woolwine of the U.S. Navy, subject to the qua.llfl.catlons David D. N. Va.nn Charles W. Weikel son Robert 0. Wray, Jr. therefor as provided by law: stephen s. Voetsch Robert S. Wels Mark S. Wllsey Charles R. Wright Lawrence R. Baun Robert J. Voigt Michael R. Weiss Duane A. Wilson Paul T. Wright Robert J. Gallagher John E. Von Gohren Michael K. Welch Clifford C. Wilson David C. Wyatt The following-named temporary chief war­ Daniel R. Vortherms Willla.m J. Welch III George H. Wllson W1llia.m J. Ya.len rant officer to be appointed a permanent chief Joseph A. Wllson, Jr. Leslle K. Yamashita warrant officer, W-2, in the line, in the U.S. David W. Walker Christopher G. Wenz Robert J. Wilson Brian S. Yanagi Navy, subject to the qualifications therefor Jay W. Wa.llln Richard C. West Mark R. Winsor David W. Yip a.s provided by law: Harvey T. Walsh III Thomas S. Wethera.ld Gustav A. Wirth Richard A. Yocum Norman C. Hom Steven D. Walton Alan B. Whiting James E. Wise II David G. Yoshirhara The following-named Navy enlisted can­ Brian D. Ward Peter D. Whitney John D. Withers Mark F. Young didate to be appointed a permanent chief James A. Ward Scott W. Whitney Thomas M. David W. Za.iss warrant officer, W-2, in the line, in the U.S. Richard C. Warner Robert A. Wiesenberg Wlttenschla.eger Eric Zeigler Navy, subject to the qualifications therefor John A.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2, 1979
    Dorm financing gets 'no' vote from SCHEV By DONNA SIZEMORE addition of two new degrees at the council taking a more while rejecting proposals the council itself approve. News for James Madison JMU, the Master of Fine Arts active role in budgeting. from JMU, Christopher "I think we'll ultimately University from the State in Art and the Master of The council did not feel that Newport College, George gain approval," Hilton said. Council of Higher Education Music, Hilton said. JMU has sufficient need for Mason University and Old If the funds are allocated for of Virginia (SCHEV) was both According to Hilton, JMU more on-campus housing, Dominion University. the dorm construction, the bad and good. will appeal the council's according to Hilton, and The "Roanoke Times and building will provide housing The council denied approval decision on the dormitory suggested that the university World News" called the for 136 students. However, the of JMU's $1.7 million budget budget request and hope to have a private builder council's rejection of JMU's dorm's location has yet to be request for the building of gain their approval before the construct more facilities near housing request "a surprise determined. dormitory facilities, requests go before the campus and in turn lease move." The $1.5 million WUU according to Fred Hilton, Virginia General Assembly in these facilities for student "Our need may not have expansion, if approved by the assistant to the vice president January. housing. been clearly represented," General Assembly, will be of university relations. The General Assembly has Hilton does not believe that Hilton said, as JMU did not used for student meeting and However, the council final decisive power on all this is a feasible solution, have a representative at the conference facilities, Hilton approved a $1.5 million budget requests.
    [Show full text]