National Guard and Reserve Equipment Report for FY2016

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

National Guard and Reserve Equipment Report for FY2016 NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016 (NGRER FY 2016) (In Accordance with Section 10541, Title 10, United States Code) March 2015 Prepared by Department of Defense Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Materiel and Facilities) COL Matthew W. Lucas, Editor Washington, DC 20301-1500 The estimated cost of this report for the Department of Defense is approximately $779,000 in Fiscal Years 2014–2015. This includes $193,000 in expenses and $586,000 in DOD labor. Generated on 2015Feb06 RefID: E-0E1F0D2 OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1500 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-1500 FOREWORD Over the past decade, the Reserve Component (RC) has once again validated its enduring role as a cornerstone of our Nation’s Total Force. Using this same history as a guide, it is imperative that RC operational equipping capacity is not diminished. As the Department manages the impacts of the Budget Control Act, individual Services continue to make difficult resource choices, potentially at significant cost to the RC. Historically, practices such as RC underfunding, cascading of outdated equipment from the Active Component (AC) to RC, and labeling of obsolete equipment as “modern” have been considered reasonable for a “Strategic Reserve”. This era is over. To fully respond to the worldwide demand for RC capabilities, to ensure component interoperability, and to keep faith with the expectations and experiences of all who serve, deliberate and sustained modernization and procurement funding must be recognized as an institutional imperative. In 1981, Congress created an equipment appropriation for the RC that stood apart from the President’s Budget submission entitled the National Guard and Reserve Equipment Appropriation (NGREA). NGREA was a response to AC budget priorities and was intended to supplement the Services' base procurement appropriations for the RC. However, the Services retain their Title 10 responsibility to fund and equip their respective Reserve and National Guard. In recent years, NGREA has provided temporary relief to the Services from adequately reforming their Total Force budgetary processes. Budgeting processes that treat the RC as an indispensable part of the Total Force could neutralize the requirement for NGREA and stabilize RC equipment levels, modernization, and availability that would prevent the resourcing peaks and valleys consistent with the Strategic Reserve paradigm. Due to the hard work of the Services and several initiatives put in place over the past 13 years, RC equipment levels are at some of the highest in recent history; however, the Services have yet to achieve transparency in their procurement and distribution processes. Whether attempting to preserve decision space or Service flexibility, the methodologies and movement of equipment between components remains opaque and lacks standardization across the Services. To further enterprise-wide transparency, the Department has initiated an independent study of the RC Equipment Transparency Report (ETR) to evaluate both its value and effectiveness in providing the required transparency mandated by the Commission on the National Guard and Reserves, Deputy Secretary of Defense, and DoD Instruction 1225.06. This study will suggest potential improvements to and alternatives for the ETR. The Reserve Component has always had strong support from our Nation’s elected representatives. This advocacy reflects the impact our RC has across the world on behalf of the United States, as well as the positive impact that our Service members have on their own communities on a daily basis. Reserve and Guard forces must therefore be equipped and appropriately funded to meet the challenges of this new era while fulfilling their obligations to the Total Force. Sincerely, Richard O. Wightman, Jr. Principal Deputy Table of Contents Chapter 1 Overview I. Reserve Component Equipping Challenges 1-1 II. Scope of the Report 1-3 III. Equipment Shortages 1-4 IV. Equipment Procurement 1-5 V. The Reserve Components’ Equipping Concerns 1-8 A. The Army National Guard (ARNG) 1-8 B. The Army Reserve (AR) 1-9 C. The United States Marine Corps Reserve (USMCR) 1-11 D. The United States Navy Reserve (USNR) 1-11 E. The Air National Guard (ANG) 1-12 F. The Air Force Reserve (AFR) 1-13 G. The United States Coast Guard Reserve (USCGR) 1-14 Chapter 2 United States Army Reserve Components I. Army Overview 2-1 A. Army Planning Guidance 2-1 B. Army Equipping Guidance 2-2 C. Army Equipping Assessment 2-3 D. Plan to Fill Mobilization Shortages in the RC 2-4 E. Initiatives Affecting RC Equipment 2-5 F. Plan to Achieve Full Compatibility Between AC and RC 2-8 II. Army National Guard Overview 2-9 A. Current Status of the Army National Guard 2-9 B. Changes since the Last NGRER 2-16 C. Future Years Program (FY 2016–FY 2018) 2-17 D. Summary 2-24 Table 1: ARNG Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: ARNG Average Age of Equipment Table 3: ARNG Service Procurement Program - Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: ARNG NGREA Procurements Table 5: ARNG Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: ARNG FY 2012 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers Table 7: ARNG Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: ARNG Significant Major Item Shortages III. United States Army Reserve Overview 2-26 A. Current Status of the Army Reserve 2-26 B. Future Years Program (FY 2016–FY 2018) 2-30 C. Summary 2-39 i Table 1: USAR Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: USAR Average Age of Equipment Table 3: USAR Service Procurement Program - Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: USAR NGREA Procurements Table 5: USAR Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: USAR FY 2012 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers Table 7: USAR Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: USAR Significant Major Item Shortages IV. Army Equipping Assessment 2-42 Chapter 3 United States Marine Corps Reserve I. Marine Corps Overview 3-1 A. Marine Corps Planning Guidance 3-1 B. Marine Corps Equipping Policy 3-2 C. Plan to Fill Mobilization Shortages in the RC 3-2 D. Initiatives Affecting RC Equipment 3-2 E. Plan to Achieve Full Compatibility between AC and RC 3-2 II. Marine Corps Reserve Overview 3-3 A. Current Status of the Marine Corps Reserve 3-3 B. Changes since the Last NGRER 3-5 C. Future Years Program (FY 2016–FY 2018) 3-6 D. Summary 3-9 Table 1: USMCR Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: USMCR Average Age of Equipment Table 3: USMCR Service Procurement Program - Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: USMCR NGREA Procurements Table 5: USMCR Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: USMCR FY 2012 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers Table 7: USMCR Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: USMCR Significant Major Item Shortages Chapter 4 United States Navy Reserve I. Navy Overview 4-1 A. Navy Planning Guidance 4-1 B. Navy Equipping Policy 4-2 C. Plan to Fill Reserve Component Equipment Mobilization Requirements 4-2 D. Initiatives Affecting RC Equipment 4-3 E. Plan to Achieve Full Compatibility Between AC and RC 4-5 II. Navy Reserve Overview 4-6 A. Current Status of the Navy Reserve 4-6 B. Changes since the Last NGRER 4-14 C. Future Years Program (FY 2016–FY 2018) 4-15 ii D. Summary 4-15 Table 1: USNR Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: USNR Average Age of Equipment Table 3: USNR Service Procurement Program Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: USNR NGREA Procurements Table 5: USNR Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: USNR FY 2012 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers Table 7: USNR Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: USNR Significant Major Item Shortages Chapter 5 United States Air Reserve Components I. United States Air Force Overview 5-1 A. Air Force Planning Guidance 5-1 B. Air Force Equipping Policy 5-2 C. Plan to Fill Modernization Shortages in the RC 5-2 D. Initiatives Affecting RC Equipment 5-2 E. Plan to Achieve Full Compatibility between AC and RC 5-3 II. Air National Guard Overview 5-4 A. Current Status of the Air National Guard 5-4 B. Changes since the Last NGRER 5-4 C. Future Years Program (FY 2016–FY 2018) 5-7 D. Summary 5-17 Table 1: ANG Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: ANG Average Age of Equipment Table 3: ANG Service Procurement Program - Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: ANG NGREA Procurements Table 5: ANG Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: ANG FY 2012 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers Table 7: ANG Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: ANG Significant Major Item Shortages III. Air Force Reserve Overview 5-19 A. Current Status of the Air Force Reserve 5-19 B. Changes since the Last NGRER 5-28 C. Future Years Program (FY 2016–FY 2018) 5-30 D. Summary 5-31 Table 1: AFR Consolidated Major Item Inventory and Requirements Table 2: AFR Average Age of Equipment Table 3: AFR Service Procurement Program - Reserve (P-1R) Table 4: AFR NGREA Procurements Table 5: AFR Projected Equipment Transfer/Withdrawal Quantities Table 6: AFR FY 2012 Planned vs Actual Procurements and Transfers iii Table 7: AFR Major Item of Equipment Substitution List Table 8: AFR Significant Major Item Shortages Chapter 6 United States Coast Guard Reserve I. Coast Guard Overview 6-1 A. Coast Guard Planning Guidance 6-2 B. Coast Guard Equipping Policy 6-3 C. Plan to Fill Mobilization Shortages in the RC 6-3 D. Initiatives Affecting RC Equipment 6-3 II. Coast Guard Reserve Overview 6-5 A.
Recommended publications
  • Heritage, Heroes, Horizons 50 Years of A/TA Tradition and Transformation
    AIRLIFT/TANKER QUARTERLY Volume 26 • Number 4 • Fall 2018 Heritage, Heroes, Horizons 50 Years of A/TA Tradition and Transformation Pages 14 2018 A/TA Awards Pages 25-58 A Salute to Our Industry Partners Pages 60-69 Table of Contents 2018 A/TA Board of Offi cers & Convention Staff ..................................................................... 2 A/TA UpFront Chairman’s Comments. ............................................................................................................. 4 President’s Message .................................................................................................................... 5 Secretary’s Notes ........................................................................................................................ 6 AIRLIFT/TANKER QUARTERLY Volume 26 • Number 4 • Fall 2018 The Inexorable March of Time, an article by Col. Dennis “Bud” Traynor, USAF ret ...................7 ISSN 2578-4064 Airlift/Tanker Quarterly is published four times a year by the Features Airlift/Tanker Association, 7983 Rhodes Farm Way, Chattanooga, A Welcome Message from Air Mobility Command Commader General Maryanne Miller ...... 8 Tennessee 37421. Postage paid at St. Louis, Missouri. Subscription rate: $40.00 per year. Change of address A Welcome Message from Air Mobility Command Chief Master Sergeant Larry C. Williams, Jr... 10 requires four weeks notice. The Airlift/Tanker Association is a non-profi t professional Cover Story organization dedicated to providing a forum for people Heritage, Heores, Horizons interested
    [Show full text]
  • Full-Time Maintainers Command Makes Strides Hiring Air Reserve Technicians
    Click. Tweet. Like. citamn.afrc.af.mil @citizenairman @citizenairman Volume 71 No. 6 December 2019 Full-time Maintainers Command makes strides hiring Air Reserve Technicians Official Magazine of the Air Force Reserve From the Top @ AFRCCommander Chief’s View @ AFRC.CCC STRENGTHENING YOUR THE COMMAND TEAM, SUPPORTING CHIEF'S NEW YEAR'S YOUR FAMILY CHALLENGE Heroes of the Air Force Reserve, Lt. Gen. Richard Season’s greetings Citizen Airmen! First off, the boss and Scobee high fives Being part of an outstanding team is I want to say thank you. Thank you for all you have done deployed members of an amazing feeling. I am honored to be a his Air Force Reserve throughout the year, and thank you for what you will continue part of this incredible Air Force Reserve family. ( Tech. Sgt. to do in the coming year. team. You, our Airmen, are highly skilled Robert Cloys) Your steadfast service, commitment and sacrifice are com- individuals, and your abilities are magni- mendable, and we couldn’t be more proud of you. fied when you work as a team. A strong The cohesion and effectiveness of command chief and I would like to be We had a couple of rough patches this past year; and without team can accomplish nearly anything. the operations-maintenance team was at every unit’s drill weekend this month a doubt, we will face challenges in the new year. Regardless the I’ve witnessed the achievements of visible to the entire wing. It was clear to personally thank you for all your hard challenge, like always, we will persevere because of Airmen like many great teams.
    [Show full text]
  • Dcn 1631 Department of the Air Force Air Force Reserve
    DCN 1631 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE RESERVE May 29, 1995 910 AWICC 3976 King Graves Road Young stown-Warren Regional Airport Air Reserve Station, Ohio 44473-09 10 Base Realignment and Closure Commission 1700 North Moore Street, Suite 1425 Arlington VA 22208 Dear Commissioners On behalf of the 910 Airlift Wing, I would like to thank you for the opportunity to demonstrate how we at Youngstown have effectively utilized the scarce resources with which we have been entrusted over the years. With the expert help of the Ohio Edison Company, we have prepared this binder and video to show the 910 Airlift Wing as a vital part of the Air Force Reserve, for today and for the future. The 910 Airlift Wing has a rich tradition of "going the extra mile" to get the job done. Through our community involvement program, we have developed a reputation as good, responsible citizens. The awards and accolades this unit has received and its esprit de corps is a testimony to the dedication, hard work and professionalism of its people. We have tried to capture in this book the responsibility and vision with which we have pursued our goals over the years. We hope these illustrations we have prepared are clear and concise so as to assist the commission in resolving a difficult situation in a fair and equitable manner. If you need any additional information, we will be happy to provide it. Sincerely, BERNARD J. PIECZYNSKI, Colonel, US AFR Commander BRAC REVIEW GUIDE - 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Letter from the Commander I SECTION I - Youngstown Air Reserve
    [Show full text]
  • National Guard and Reserve Equipment Report for FY2015
    NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015 (NGRER FY 2015) (In Accordance with Section 10541, Title 10, United States Code) March 2014 Prepared by Department of Defense Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Materiel and Facilities) COL Denise L. Loring, Editor Washington, DC 20301-1500 The estimated cost of this report for the Department of Defense is approximately $292,000 in Fiscal Years 2013–2014. Generated on 2014Feb28 RefID: 0-43F5A8A OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1500 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-1500 FOREWORD The Reserve Component (RC) allows for expanded capacity and capability as a cost-effective part of the Total Force with global reach and flexibility. Since 2001, the RC has supported more than 875,000 mobilizations worldwide. Budgetary pressures will continue to require astute management of reduced resources to mitigate their effects. The RC provides capability and capacity at a reduced cost in a time of funding reductions across all components. The RC, when integrated as part of the operational force during armed conflict and peacetime, provides for a cost-effective force mix at acceptable levels of risk to support the defense strategy. The RC equipment levels are at some of the highest levels in history; however this era of postwar fiscal reductions will bring significant equipping challenges over the next several years. The Department has made strides in enhancing equipment transparency and accountability, but has not yet attained transparency into the Services procurement and distribution processes and outcomes. The Department must explore other options, such as separating the RC procurement funding, to meet the intent of the Commission on the National Guard and Reserve initiatives on equipping inadequacies between Active Component (AC) and RC.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Corps
    OOffffiiccee ooff tthhee SSeeccrreettaarryy ooff DDeeffeennssee OOppeerraattiioonn aanndd MMaaiinntteennaannccee OOvveerrvviieeww FFeebbrruuaarryy 22000077 FFiissccaall YYeeaarr ((FFYY)) 22000088 BBuuddggeett EEssttiimmaatteess TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW Page Service by Appropriation......................................................1 MAJOR ACTIVITIES Page O&M Title Summary ............................................................3 Air Operations.......................................................................65 APPROPRIATION HIGHLIGHTS Base Operations Support .....................................................84 Command, Control, Communications (C3)........................90 Army........................................................................................6 Depot Maintenance ...............................................................95 Navy........................................................................................16 Environmental Programs....................................................101 Marine Corps ........................................................................26 Facilities Sustainment, Repair & Modernization and Air Force................................................................................30 Demolition Programs …………………………………109 Defense-Wide.........................................................................35 Land Forces ..........................................................................112 Reserve Forces.......................................................................38
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Appropriations Bill, 2005
    1 108TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 108–553 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2005 R E P O R T OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS [TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 4613] together with ADDITIONAL VIEWS JUNE 18, 2004.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 94–301 WASHINGTON : 2004 VerDate mar 24 2004 03:28 Jun 20, 2004 Jkt 029011 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\PICKUP\HR553.108 HR553 E:\Seals\Congress.#13 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2005 VerDate mar 24 2004 03:28 Jun 20, 2004 Jkt 029011 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 E:\PICKUP\HR553.108 HR553 108TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 108–553 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2005 R E P O R T OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS [TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 4613] together with ADDITIONAL VIEWS JUNE 18, 2004.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed VerDate mar 24 2004 03:28 Jun 20, 2004 Jkt 029011 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6012 Sfmt 6012 E:\PICKUP\HR553.108 HR553 E:\Seals\Congress.#13 VerDate mar 24 2004 03:28 Jun 20, 2004 Jkt 029011 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 6012 Sfmt 6012 E:\PICKUP\HR553.108 HR553 C O N T E N T S Page Bill Totals ................................................................................................................. 1 Committee Budget Review Process ........................................................................ 4 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 4 Fiscal Year 2005 Budget Request .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Guard and Reserve Equipment Report (NGRER) For
    NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 (NGRER FY 2018) (In Accordance with Section 10541, Title 10, United States Code) March 2017 Prepared by Department of Defense Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Readiness Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Readiness Programming and Resources) COL Samuel R. Cook, Editor Washington, DC 20301-1500 The estimated cost of this report for the Department of Defense is approximately $896,000 in Fiscal Years 2016–2017. This includes $212,000 in expenses and $684,000 in DoD labor. Generated on 2017Feb15 RefID: A-9CB6C19 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Overview I. Reserve Component Equipping Challenges (Operational & Strategic Reserve Forces) 1-1 II. Scope of the Report 1-3 III. Equipment Shortages 1-4 IV. Equipment Procurement 1-5 V. Reserve Component Equipping Challenges 1-7 A. Army National Guard (ARNG) 1-7 B. Army Reserve (AR) 1-8 C. United States Marine Corps Reserve (USMCR) 1-8 D. United States Navy Reserve (USNR) 1-9 E. Air National Guard (ANG) 1-9 F. Air Force Reserve (AFR) 1-10 G. United States Coast Guard Reserve (USCGR) 1-11 Chapter 2 United States Army Reserve Components I. Army Overview 2-1 A. Army Planning Guidance 2-1 B. Army Equipping Guidance 2-2 C. Plan to Fill Mobilization Shortages in the RC 2-2 D. Initiatives Affecting RC Equipment 2-3 E. Army Plan to Achieve Full Compatibility between AC and RC 2-3 F. Army Equipping Assessment 2-3 G. Army Component Equipment Modernization 2-4 II. Army National Guard Overview 2-6 A.
    [Show full text]
  • 932 Airlift Wing
    932 AIRLIFT WING MISSION The mission of the 932 Airlift Wing, Air Force Reserve, assigned as a tenant unit at Scott Air Force Base, Ill., is to provide first-class, worldwide, safe, and reliable airlift for distinguished visitors and their staffs. It equips, trains, and organizes a ready force of citizen airmen to support and maintain all facets of air base operations involving infrastructure and security. The wing also provides worldwide medical services to the warfighter from the front line to Continental United States fixed medical treatment facilities. The wing headquarters has four groups assigned. The groups are the 932 Operations Group, Medical Group, Maintenance Group, and the Mission Support Group. The subordinate units assigned to the Operations Group are the 73 Airlift Squadron, the 932 Aeromedical Evacuation Squadron and the 12 Operations Weather Flight. Subordinate units under the Medical Group include the 932 Aerospace Medicine Flight, the 932 Aeromedical Staging Squadron, and the 932 Medical Squadron. The assigned unit to the Maintenance Group is the 932 Maintenance Squadron and the Maintenance Operations Flight. The Mission Support Group subordinate units include the 932 Civil Engineer Squadron, and the 932 Mission Support Flight. LINEAGE 932 Troop Carrier Group, Medium, established and activated, 15 Jan 1963 Organized in the Reserve, 11 Feb 1963 Redesignated 932 Military Airlift Group, 1 Apr 1967 Redesignated 932 Aeromedical Airlift Group (Associate), 25 Jul 1969 Redesignated 932 Airlift Wing, 1 Oct 1994 STATIONS Scott AFB, IL, 11 Feb 1963 ASSIGNMENTS Continental Air Command, 15 Jan 1963 434 Troop Carrier Wing, 11 Feb 1963 442 Military Airlift Wing, 1 Oct 1966 514 Military Airlift Wing, 1 Apr 1969 Central Air Force Reserve Region, 1 Jan 1972 Fourteenth Air Force, 8 Oct 1976 446 Airlift Wing, 1 Aug 1992 Fourth Air Force, 1 Oct 1994 WEAPON SYSTEMS C-119, 1963-1967 C-124, 1967-1969 C-9, 1969 COMMANDERS LTC Philip G.
    [Show full text]
  • Senator Sean J. O'brien Senator Michael A. Rulli
    Senator Sean J. O’Brien Senator Michael A. Rulli Ohio Senate Ohio Senate nd rd 32 District 33 District Sponsor Testimony: Senate Concurrent Resolution (SCR) 11 Senate General Government and Agency Review Committee February 19th, 2020 Chair Schuring and members of the Senate General Government and Agency Review Committee, thank you for allowing us to present sponsor testimony to you today on SCR 11, legislation which urges the United States Department of Defense to select Youngstown Air Reserve Station as the home for the new C-130J Hercules aircraft. With nearly 1,450 military personnel, the Youngstown Air Reserve Station in Trumbull County serves as the home for the 910th Airlift Wing Air Force Command, tasked by the United States Department of Defense (DoD) to maintain the DoD’s only large area fixed-wing aerial spray capability. This capability is used for many different reasons, including to control disease-carrying insects, pest insects, undesirable vegetation, and to disperse oil spills in large bodies of water. Missions may be executed in combat areas, on DoD installations, or in response to disasters or emergencies as declared by the President of the United States. To conduct their missions, the 757th Airlift Squadron pilots, navigators, flight engineers, spray operators, and entomologists use six of their eight C-130H aircraft (originally built in 1989 and 1990) equipped with the Modular Aerial Spray System. The C-130 is capable of operating from rough dirt strips and is also the prime transport for airdropping troops and equipment into hostile areas. Using its aft loading ramp and door, the C-130 can also accommodate a wide variety of oversized cargo, including everything from utility helicopters and six- wheeled armored vehicles, to standard palletized cargo and military personnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf 15780.Pdf
    FOREWARD Your Air Force Reserve is a combat- ready force, composed of more than 70,000 proud reservists, stationed locally throughout the United States, serving globally for every Combatant Command around the world. We provide our Nation with operational capability, strategic depth and surge capacity whenever America needs us. We are an integrated Total Force partner in every Air Force core mission: Air and Space Superiority, Global Strike, Rapid Global Mobility, Intelligence, Surveillance, James F. Jackson, and Reconnaissance, and Command Lt Gen, USAF and Control. In an increasingly limited fiscal environment, reservists remain efficient and cost-effective solutions to our nation’s challenges. The majority of our Citizen Airmen serve part time, making us a highly efficient force, averaging about a third of the cost of active duty Airmen. Perhaps our greatest strength is we retain ‘Airmen for life,’ preserving the considerable investments and expertise of our Airmen beyond their Cameron B. Kirksey, active duty service. In times of crisis, we Command CMSgt can call upon our strategic depth of an additional 785,000 Airmen from the Individual Ready Reserve, Standby Reserve, Retired Reserve and Retired Active Duty. To meet future challenges, the Air Force Reserve works as a member of the “Total Force”, alongside active duty and Air National Guardsmen. This strong, three-component team is ready for combat or humanitarian relief operations worldwide. Since 2012, the Air Force Reserve can also be mobilized to respond to domestic requirements here at home. 01 Dual-use capabilities such as airlift, aeromedical evacuation and personnel recovery are equally valuable, both in-theater and for homeland support.
    [Show full text]
  • Lajes Members Take Free Space-A to Ramstein Gallons by Tech
    www.lajes.af.mil Vol. 15, No. 45 • November 19, 2010 Lajes Field, Azores, Portugal Force Protection DV jet gases at Lajes, continues training mission By Capt. Naomi Evangelista 65th Air Base Wing Public Affairs A C-40 on a training mission stopped at Lajes for a “gas-n-go” Nov. 14-15 on its way to Gander International Airport, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. Current FPCON: Alpha The C-40 is assigned to the 73rd Airlift Squadron, part Threat Level: Low of the 932nd Airlift Wing based out of Scott Air Force Base, Ill. This is the last edition While here, the military’s version of the Boeing 737- 700C transport aircraft, which is used to provide safe, of the Crossroads Xtra comfortable and reliable transport for U.S. leaders to loca- for November tions around the world, was provided a variety of services by Airmen of the 65th Air Base Wing, Lajes Field, Azores, On Nov. 15, 2010, a C-40C from the 932nd Airlift Portugal. Wing, Scott Air Force Base, Ill., departs Lajes Field "6-5... “We are responsible for refueling all aircraft that stop as part of a training mission. The 729th Air Mobility at Lajes,” said Tech. Sgt. Justin Stellflug, 65 ABW Fuels Squadron and 65th Logistics Readiness Squadron IN THE FIGHT!" Service Center NCOIC. “When the aircraft came in, we serviced the airplane for trash, water and fuel. (Pho- CY 2010 received a call from transient alert, and we immediately to by Tech. Sgt. Chyrece Campbell) dispatched our driver and the refueling unit.” hook up and refuel the plane, and both the crew chief and (as of Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Bases, Aircrew Members for C-5, C-17, C-141, and the European Theater, Killed in Aircraft Acci- Dating to 1911
    USAFAlmanac ■ Guide to Air Force Installations Worldwide Major Installations Altus AFB, Okla. 73523-5000; within Altus city Marine Aircraft Gp. 49, Det. A; Air Force Re- 620th Ex. ABG, Camp Able Sentry, Macedonia; limits, 120 mi. SW of Oklahoma City. Phone: view Boards Agency. History: activated May 731st Munitions Support Sq., Araxos AB, Greece; 580-482-8100; DSN 866-1110. Majcom: AETC. 1943. Named for Lt. Gen. Frank M. Andrews, Det. 1, Ex. Air Control Sq., Jacotenente, Italy. Host: 97th Air Mobility Wing. Mission: trains military air pioneer and WWII commander of History: one of the oldest Italian air bases, aircrew members for C-5, C-17, C-141, and the European theater, killed in aircraft acci- dating to 1911. USAF began operations 1954. KC-135 aircraft by operating AETC’s strategic dent May 3, 1943, in Iceland. Area: 6,853 Area: 1,467 acres. Runway: 8,596 ft. Altitude: airlift and aerial refueling flying training schools. acres. Runways: 9,755 ft. and 9,300 ft. Alti- 413 ft. Personnel: permanent party military, History: activated January 1943; inactivated tude: 281 ft. Personnel: permanent party mili- 3,900; DoD civilians, 241; local nationals, 550. May 1945; reactivated January 1953. Area: tary, 5,855; DoD civilians, 1,128; contract em- Housing: single family, officer, 22, enlisted, 6,981 acres. Runways: 13,440 ft., 9,000-ft. ployees, 584. Housing: single family, officer, 508; unaccompanied, UAQ/UEQ, 680; visiting, parallel runway, and 3,500-ft. assault strip. Al- 384, enlisted, 1,694; leased units, 414 off base; VOQ, 17, VAQ/VEQ, 12, DV suites, 5.
    [Show full text]