DOCSLIB.ORG

Reviews / Comptes Rendus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reviews / Comptes Rendus Document généré le 24 sept. 2021 21:43 Labour / Le Travail Reviews / Comptes Rendus Volume 62, automne 2008 URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/llt62rv01 Aller au sommaire du numéro Éditeur(s) ISSN 0700-3862 (imprimé) 1911-4842 (numérique) Découvrir la revue Citer ce compte rendu (2008). Compte rendu de [Reviews / Comptes Rendus]. Labour / Le Travail, 62, 235–315. Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d’auteur. L’utilisation des services d’Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d’utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne. https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Cet article est diffusé et préservé par Érudit. Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l’Université de Montréal, l’Université Laval et l’Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. https://www.erudit.org/fr/ REVIEWS / COMPTES RENDUS Robert B. Kristofferson, Craft ket for manufactured goods limited the Capitalism: Craftsworkers and Early extent to which capital could be profit- Industrialization in Hamilton, 1840–1870 ably invested. Relying heavily, but not (Toronto: University of Toronto Press exclusively, on the 1871 manuscript cen- 2007) sus, Kristofferson argues that smaller concerns remained viable, achieved In Craft Capitalism, Robert Kristof- greater productivity in industries where ferson offers a revisionist perspective on new technologies had not displaced craft the effects of early industrialization on production, and presented a “continued craftsworkers. Using Hamilton, Ontario, expansion of self-employment opportu- from 1840 to 1872 as a case study, he nities.” (57) By the 1870s roughly 85 to 95 contends that the combined and uneven per cent of Hamilton’s manufacturers, a nature of early industrialization presented proportion varying only slightly with the artisans with significant opportunities size of their operations, had risen to that for employment and self-employment. status from artisanal origins. The viabil- In their “transmodal position,” between ity of small concerns and the manufac- older craft production and emergent turers’ humble origins lead Kristofferson factory production, craftsworkers con- to conclude that “many, if not most, wage- structed “modes of understanding and earning craftsworkers still maintained experience influenced by capitalism but the hope, perhaps even the expectation, not fully of it or completely determined that they would one day move into mas- by its logic.” (242) Craftsworkers, argues tership or some other craft-based form of Kristofferson, were not dispossessed by independence.” (108) the early 1870s; nor did the Nine-Hours In the second half of the book, the Movement of 1872 express a new work- author argues that the background of ing-class consciousness rooted in their masters, their close shop-floor contact artisanal culture, as Gregory Kealey with and mentoring of their employees, and Bryan Palmer, among others, have and the ambitions of journeymen for argued. Instead, that movement consti- self-employment inspired a culture of tuted a generational, rather than class “master-man mutualism.” That culture debate within “mutualism” – that is, the combined residual elements, derived commonality of interests and aspirations from traditional craft relations, with accepted by masters and journeymen. emergent elements, inspired by mid- The first half of Craft Capitalism nineteenth-century industrial progress. explores the economic and social struc- As they had traditionally done, masters tures associated with early industrializa- and journeymen celebrated their “com- tion. Not unlike the conditions in many mon craft world” (120) at picnics, testi- other centres at the time, the limited monials, and parades, and even union and variable demand in Hamilton’s mar- events drew participation from employ- Table of Contents for Reviews pp. 5–6. 236 / LABOUR /LE TRAVAIL 62 ers. Manufacturers proudly emphasized, capitalism did stimulate workers’ class and were complimented upon, their self- awareness. More than that, however, his made success and continuing practical appreciation of the cultural significance craft knowledge. The public affirmation of self-employment warrants serious con- of the self-made business success pos- sideration, especially as presented in one sible during early industrialization was of the country’s major industrial cities. In just one theme in a broader new culture particular, the analysis of the discourse of self-improvement. Craftsworkers more on self-made success and self-improve- generally pursued self-improvement in ment does reveal the public context of practical skill, intellectual knowledge, personal ambitions. Still, there remains and moral responsibility as the founda- much that is overstated or uncritical in tion for a masculine independence. this study and much more that we would That the emergent cultural elements like to know about the social organiza- did not always rest easily with the resid- tion of early industrial capitalism. ual, Kristofferson maintains, was evident First, Kristofferson is probably cor- in the Nine-Hours Movement strike of rect in his contention that the status of 1872. Rather than the struggle of alien- master was a hope for many journeymen ated workers against exploiting employ- and attracted many British immigrants ers, the strike revealed that “what some to places, like Hamilton, where they masters and men considered the norms believed they could achieve a condition in of their mutualistic culture were diverg- life they saw passing at home. His proof ing.” (235) Disagreement developed not for that, however, is more inferential than over the broad objectives of the move- evidential. Rather than critically examin- ment in wanting self-improvement, but ing the immigration literature or diaries rather over the drastic means that a and correspondence of men following minority of craftsworkers took to achieve that ambition, or trying to calculate the that goal. The difference was generational probabilities of samples of artisans actu- and not one of class: an older genera- ally attaining that status, his conclusion tion, which understood its success as the rests mainly on the detailed investigation result of hard work, had little sympathy of the backgrounds of 233 industrialists for a younger generation’s impatience and listed in the 1871 manuscript census. unwillingness to follow the tried and true Their origins are taken as confirmation of way. Younger craftsworkers demanded the value and the reality of craft mobil- shorter hours as their right, which, they ity. That some might never have been felt, was justified by their contributions to able to secure master status or failed in modern industry and necessary for their their attempt is of little consequence for self-improvement as citizens in a “mod- Kristofferson, since “it is likely that the ern liberal economy and society.” (207) example of most large industrial employ- In the end, however, “the quick death” ers in the city having made the successful (217) of the movement demonstrated the transition from journeyman-for-some- lack of depth of real differences between one-else to master-of-their-own some- masters and men and the strength of what clouded this reality.” (89) “Likely” mutualism. and “somewhat” are two slippery qualifi- In one sense, Kristofferson’s argument ers for a lack of evidence. Regrettably, the is about timing, since he does concede success of some does not prove the aspi- that later, probably in the aftermath of rations or more importantly the accom- the depression of 1878 and certainly plishments of others. Indeed, one might by the 1890s, the alienating effects of argue that the success of some reduced REVIEWS / COMPTES RENDUS / 237 the chances for others, since opportuni- erty of a certain value, not all men could ties once open had become filled. vote until 1885, and even their right to Second, we do need to explore more petition was clouded by the reservations deeply the culture of “mutualism” in of the propertied about their limited mid-nineteenth-century society. Masters stake in the community. Yet, involved in and journeymen did assume reciprocal politics they were and journeymen filled dependence and obligations with one the crowds, and mobs, of election cam- another. However, even though the social paigns. We need to know more about the difference between the two could be con- political relationships between masters ceived partly as one of age, an employ- and journeymen and also to reinterpret ment relationship did bind the two the claims to rights and citizenship, as in together. Cultural values, social practices, the Nine-Hours Movement, of men who and non-monetary economic responsi- did not fully possess them. bilities may have qualified the master’s Fourth, Craft Capitalism presents power more – or, differently – than that mutuality only within its workplace of the capitalist employer, for whom the context. Voluntarism, whether in fire wage-labour contract simplified the com- brigades or the militia, filled another mitments made in employment. But the dimension of the craftsworkers’ non- master remained master and hired work- work lives and often engaged the prop- ers within the law of master and servant ertyless in the protection of the property – a concept unacknowledged in Craft of others. The responsibility to help one’s Capitalism (The author frequently terms fellow was rooted in a range of organiza- the relationship as
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sam Gordon Bio-Bibliographical Sketch
    Lubitz' TrotskyanaNet Sam Gordon Bio-Bibliographical Sketch Contents: • Basic biographical data • Biographical sketch • Selective bibliography • Notes on archives Basic biographical data Name: Sam Gordon Other names (by-names, pseud., etc.): Burton ; Drake ; Harry ; Joe ; Joad ; J.S. ; Paul G. Stevens ; J. Stuart ; J.B. Stuart ; J.E.B. Stuart ; Ted ; Tom Date and place of birth: May 5, 1910, ??? (Austria-Hungary) Date and place of death: March 12, 1982, London (Britain) Nationality: USA Occupations, careers, etc.: Printer, journalist, translator, seaman, organizer Time of activity in Trotskyist movement: 1929 - 1982 (lifelong Trotskyist) Biographical sketch Sam Gordon was an outstanding Trotskyist who during the 1940s played an eminent rôle as a liaison man between the American SWP and the European Trotskyists as well as within the leading bodies of the Fourth In­ ternational. The following biographical sketch is chiefly based on the material listed in the last paragraph of the Selective bibliography section below. Sam Gordon1 was born on May 5, 1910 as a son of Yiddish speaking Jewish parents living in that part of Poland which then belonged to the Austrian-Hungarian Empire. However, when Sam was still a baby, the family moved to Vienna, the Austrian capital, thus the boy grew up in a German speaking en­ vironment. In 1920, the family went to New York (USA) where Sam Gordon rapidly learnt English and got naturalized under the Americanized name of Gordon; as an adolescent he was fluent in three languages. In the early 1940s, Gordon got acquainted with Mildred Fellerman (b. 1923), a British teacher and Labour Party activist; when the two met again in Paris in 1947, they fell in love, and in 1948 they got married in the United States; in the 1950s they got a son.
    [Show full text]
  • Library of Social History Collection, Date (Inclusive): 1894-2000 Collection Number: 91004 Creator: Library of Social History (New York, N
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt900021c7 No online items Register of the Library of Social History Collection Prepared by Dale Reed Hoover Institution Archives Stanford University Stanford, California 94305-6010 Phone: (650) 723-3563 Fax: (650) 725-3445 Email: [email protected] © 2003 Hoover Institution Archives. All rights reserved. Register of the Library of Social History 91004 1 Collection Register of the Library of Social History Collection Hoover Institution Archives Stanford University Stanford, California Contact Information Hoover Institution Archives Stanford University Stanford, California 94305-6010 Phone: (650) 723-3563 Fax: (650) 725-3445 Email: [email protected] Prepared by: Dale Reed Date Completed: 2000 Encoded by: ByteManagers using OAC finding aid conversion service specifications © 2003 Hoover Institution Archives. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Library of Social History collection, Date (inclusive): 1894-2000 Collection number: 91004 Creator: Library of Social History (New York, N. Y.) Extent: 299 manuscript boxes, 2 card file boxes, 2 oversize boxes157 linear feet Repository: Hoover Institution on War, Revolution, and Peace Stanford, California 94305-6010 Abstract: Serial issues, pamphlets, leaflets, internal bulletins, other internal documents, and electoral and convention material, issued by Trotskyist groups throughout the world, and especially in the United States, Latin America and Western Europe, and including some materials issued by non-Trotskyist left-wing groups; speeches and writings by Fidel Castro and other Cuban leaders, and printed matter relating to Cuba, with indexes thereto; speeches and writings by Nicaraguan Sandinista leaders; and public and internal issuances of the New Jewel Movement of Grenada and its leaders, and printed and other material relating to the movement and its overthrow.
    [Show full text]
  • Marxist Politics Or Unprincipled Combinationism?
    Prometheus Research Series 5 Marxist Politics or Unprincipled Combinationism? Internal Problems of the Workers Party by Max Shachtman Reprinted from Internal Bulletin No. 3, February 1936, of the Workers Party of the United States With Introduction and Appendices , ^3$ Prometheus Research Library September*^ Marxist Politics or Unprincipled Combinationism? Internal Problems of the Workers Party by Max Shachtman Reprinted from Internal Bulletin No. 3, February 1936, of the Workers Party of the United States With Introduction and Appendices Prometheus Research Library New York, New York September 2000 Prometheus graphic from a woodcut by Fritz Brosius ISBN 0-9633828-6-1 Prometheus Research Series is published by Spartacist Publishing Co., Box 1377 GPO, New York, NY 10116 Table of Contents Editorial Note 3 Introduction by the Prometheus Research Library 4 Marxist Politics or Unprincipled Combinationism? Internal Problems of the Workers Party, by Max Shachtman 19 Introduction 19 Two Lines in the Fusion 20 The "French" Turn and Organic Unity 32 Blocs and Blocs: What Happened at the CLA Convention 36 The Workers Party Up To the June Plenum 42 The Origin of the Weber Group 57 A Final Note: The Muste Group 63 Conclusion 67 Appendix I Resolution on the Organizational Report of the National Committee, 30 November 1934 69 Appendix II Letter by Cannon to International Secretariat, 1 5 August 1935 72 Letter by Glotzer to International Secretariat, 20 November 1935 76 Appendix III National Committee of the Workers Party U.S., December 1934 80 Glossary 81 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/marxistpoliticsoOOshac Editorial Note The documents in this bulletin have in large part been edited for stylistic consistency, particularly in punctuation, capitalization and emphasis, and to read smoothly for the modern reader.
    [Show full text]
  • Japanese Invade Shanghai!
    WORKERS The Militant OF THE W ORLD. UNITE Weekly Organ of the Communist League of America [Opposition] Published weekly by the Communist Le ague of America (Opposition) at 84 East 10th Street, New York, N. Y. Entered as second class mall matter. November 28, 1928 at the Post Office at a ew York, N. Y. under the act of March 3. 1879. VOLUME V, NO. 5 [WHOLE NO. 101]_________________ NEW YORK, SATURDAY, JANUARY 30, 1932 PRICE 5 CENTS On the German S i t u a t i o n OPEN FORUM Japanese Invade Shanghai! Lecture by ALBERT GLOTZER W ar Threatens in the Far East and against the Soviet Union An Appeal to all the Communist Trotsky, supported by the international Left Opposition, for a united front to Workers by the National Committee Germany - Fascism or prevent Fascism from coming to power, As we go to press, the wires are still tion in dealing with the hardly delectable of the world revolution—(Workers’ Rus­ of the Communist League of America a new campaign of calumniation and humming with the latest dispatches of C o m m u n ism demarches of their Oriental competitor. sia Is the immediate and common ob­ (Opposition) the Japanese seizure of Shanghai. Bat­ falsehood has been launched, initiated In such a heated atmosphere as the and approved by the central Stalinist tles between Nipponese and Chinese jective of all the powers lrhat be. The danger of Fascism in Germany has at the bureaucracy. “Trotskyism”, killed a troops are in fu ll blast all over Chapel, present, even the fact that several Am­ not diminished.
    [Show full text]
  • Bio-Bibliographical Sketch of Max Shachtman
    The Lubitz' TrotskyanaNet Max Shachtman Bio-Bibliographical Sketch Contents: • Basic biographical data • Biographical sketch • Selective bibliography • Notes on archives Basic biographical data Name: Max Shachtman Other names (by-names, pseud. etc.): Cousin John * Marty Dworkin * M.S. * Max Marsh * Max * Michaels * Pedro * S. * Max Schachtman * Sh * Maks Shakhtman * S-n * Tr * Trent * M.N. Trent Date and place of birth: September 10, 1904, Warsaw (Russia [Poland]) Date and place of death: November 4, 1972, Floral Park, NY (USA) Nationality: Russian, American Occupations, careers, etc.: Editor, writer, party leader Time of activity in Trotskyist movement: 1928 - ca. 1948 Biographical sketch Max Shachtman was a renowned writer, editor, polemicist and agitator who, together with James P. Cannon and Martin Abern, in 1928/29 founded the Trotskyist movement in the United States and for some 12 years func­ tioned as one of its main leaders and chief theoreticians. He was a close collaborator of Leon Trotsky and translated some of his major works. Nicknamed Trotsky's commissar for foreign affairs, he held key positions in the leading bodies of Trotsky's international movement before, in 1940, he split from the Socialist Workers Party (SWP), founded the Workers Party (WP) and in 1948 definitively dissociated from the Fourth International. Shachtman's name was closely webbed with the theory of bureaucratic collectivism and with what was described as Third Campism ('Neither Washington nor Moscow'). His thought had some lasting influence on a consider­ able number of contemporaneous intellectuals, writers, and socialist youth, both American and abroad. Once a key figure in the history and struggles of the American and international Trotskyist movement, Shachtman, from the late 1940s to his death in 1972, made a remarkable journey from the left margin of American society to the right, thus having been an inspirer of both Anti-Stalinist Marxists and of neo-conservative hard-liners.
    [Show full text]
  • Trotsky and the Problem of Soviet Bureaucracy
    TROTSKY AND THE PROBLEM OF SOVIET BUREAUCRACY by Thomas Marshall Twiss B.A., Mount Union College, 1971 M.A., University of Pittsburgh, 1972 M.S., Drexel University, 1997 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2009 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Thomas Marshall Twiss It was defended on April 16, 2009 and approved by William Chase, Professor, Department of History Ronald H. Linden, Professor, Department of Political Science Ilya Prizel, Professor, Department of Political Science Dissertation Advisor: Jonathan Harris, Professor, Department of Political Science ii Copyright © by Thomas Marshall Twiss 2009 iii TROTSKY AND THE PROBLEM OF SOVIET BUREAUCRACY Thomas Marshall Twiss, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2009 In 1917 the Bolsheviks anticipated, on the basis of the Marxist classics, that the proletarian revolution would put an end to bureaucracy. However, soon after the revolution many within the Bolshevik Party, including Trotsky, were denouncing Soviet bureaucracy as a persistent problem. In fact, for Trotsky the problem of Soviet bureaucracy became the central political and theoretical issue that preoccupied him for the remainder of his life. This study examines the development of Leon Trotsky’s views on that subject from the first years after the Russian Revolution through the completion of his work The Revolution Betrayed in 1936. In his various writings over these years Trotsky expressed three main understandings of the nature of the problem: During the civil war and the first years of NEP he denounced inefficiency in the distribution of supplies to the Red Army and resources throughout the economy as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Vita for Alan M. Wald
    1 July 2016 VITA FOR ALAN M. WALD Emeritus Faculty as of June 2014 FORMERLY H. CHANDLER DAVIS COLLEGIATE PROFESSOR OF ENGLISH LITERATURE AND AMERICAN CULTURE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, ANN ARBOR Address Office: Prof. Alan Wald, English Department, University of Michigan, 3187 Angell Hall, Ann Arbor, Mi. 48109-1003. Home: 3633 Bradford Square Drive, Ann Arbor, Mi. 48103 Faxes can be received at 734-763-3128. E-mail: [email protected] Education B.A. Antioch College, 1969 (Literature) M.A. University of California at Berkeley, 1971 (English) Ph. D. University of California at Berkeley, 1974 (English) Occupational History Lecturer in English, San Jose State University, Fall 1974 Associate in English, University of California at Berkeley, Spring 1975 Assistant Professor in the English Department and in the Program in American Culture at the University of Michigan, 1975-81 Associate Professor in the English Department and in the Program in American Culture at the University of Michigan, 1981-86 Professor in the English Department and in the Program in American Culture at the University of Michigan, 1986- Director, Program in American Culture, University of Michigan, 2000-2003 H. Chandler Davis Collegiate Professor, University of Michigan, 2007-2014 Professor Emeritus, University of Michigan, 2014- Research and Teaching Specialties 20th Century United States Literature Realism, Naturalism, Modernism in Mid-20th Century U.S. Literature Literary Radicalism in the United States Marxism and U.S. Cultural Studies African American Writers on the Left Modernist Poetry and the Left The Thirties New York Jewish Writers and Intellectuals Twentieth Century History of Socialist, Communist, Trotskyist and New Left Movements in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Workers' Party Revisited by Betty Reid Mandell Associate Professor of Social Work
    Bridgewater Review Volume 3 | Issue 2 Article 12 Jul-1985 Cultural Commentary: The orW kers' Party Revisited Betty Reid Mandell Bridgewater State College Recommended Citation Mandell, Betty Reid (1985). Cultural Commentary: The orkW ers' Party Revisited. Bridgewater Review, 3(2), 23-25. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/br_rev/vol3/iss2/12 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. CULTURAL COMMENTARY The Workers' Party Revisited by Betty Reid Mandell Associate Professor of Social Work your houses." In 1948 this small group of ers' Party, another on Harvey Swados' 1970 Though conservative politicians tend to radicals, called the Worker's Party, was novel Standing Fast as a portrayal of the portray socialism as a unified, monolithic placed on Attorney General Tom Clark's list Workers' Party, and the third on three force, its history as an American political of subversive organizations. In 1958 they journals which had their roots in the Work­ and ideological movement is, as Betty Man­ were removed from the list. Then they ers' Party: Politics, Dissent, and New Po­ dell reports. anything but unified. To under­ disbanded. litics. Invitations were sent to former Work­ standsomething ofthe issues with which the Twenty-six years later, on May 6-7, 1983, ers' Party activists, some friends, and some movement has struggled, a bit of back­ some of that small group and a few friends contributors to early issues of the journals. ground may be useful. reassembled at New York University'S Tam­ The invitation list was a story in itself, In 1929 the Communist League ofAmer­ iment Library for a Workers' Party/ Stand­ combining those who had stood fast in their ica (later to change its name to the Socialist ing Fast conference to reminisce about old radicalism and those who had turned to the Workers Party - SWP) was founded on times and to celebrate the acquisition by right.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking the Historiography of United States Communism
    American Communist History, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2003 Rethinking the Historiography of United States Communism BRYAN D. PALMER Questioning American Radicalism We ask questions of radicalism in the United States. Many are driven by high expectations and preconceived notions of what such radicalism should look like. Our queries reflect this: Why is there no socialism in America? Why are workers in the world’s most advanced capitalist nation not “class conscious”? Why has no “third party” of laboring people emerged to challenge the estab- lished political formations of money, privilege, and business power? Such interrogation is by no means altogether wrongheaded, although some would prefer to jettison it entirely. Yet these and other related questions continue to exercise considerable interest, and periodically spark debate and efforts to reformulate and redefine analytic agendas for the study of American labor radicals, their diversity, ideas, and practical activities.1 Socialism, syndicalism, anarchism, and communism have been minority traditions in US life, just as they often are in other national cultures and political economies. The revol- utionary left is, and always has been, a vanguard of minorities. But minorities often make history, if seldom in ways that prove to be exactly as they pleased. Life in a minority is not, however, an isolated, or inevitably an isolating, experience. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the US gave rise to a significant left, rooted in what many felt was a transition from the Old World to a New Order. Populists,
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Glotzer Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf1t1n989d No online items Register of the Albert Glotzer papers Finding aid prepared by Dale Reed Hoover Institution Library and Archives © 2010 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6003 [email protected] URL: http://www.hoover.org/library-and-archives Register of the Albert Glotzer 91006 1 papers Title: Albert Glotzer papers Date (inclusive): 1919-1994 Collection Number: 91006 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Library and Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 67 manuscript boxes, 6 envelopes(27.7 Linear Feet) Abstract: Correspondence, writings, minutes, internal bulletins and other internal party documents, legal documents, and printed matter, relating to Leon Trotsky, the development of American Trotskyism from 1928 until the split in the Socialist Workers Party in 1940, the development of the Workers Party and its successor, the Independent Socialist League, from that time until its merger with the Socialist Party in 1958, Trotskyism abroad, the Dewey Commission hearings of 1937, legal efforts of the Independent Socialist League to secure its removal from the Attorney General's list of subversive organizations, and the political development of the Socialist Party and its successor, Social Democrats, U.S.A., after 1958. Creator: Glotzer, Albert, 1908-1999 Hoover Institution Library & Archives Access The collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Library & Archives. Acquisition Information Acquired by the Hoover Institution Library & Archives in 1991. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Albert Glotzer papers, [Box no., Folder no.
    [Show full text]
  • James P. Cannon Bio-Bibliographical Sketch
    Lubitz' TrotskyanaNet James P. Cannon Bio-Bibliographical Sketch Contents: • Basic biographical data • Biographical sketch • Selective bibliography • Notes on archives Basic biographical data Name: James P. Cannon Other names (by-names, pseud., etc.): John Battle ; C. ; James Patrick Cannon ; Jim Can­ non ; Cook ; Dawson ; Dzh. P. Kannon ; Legrand ; Martel ; Martin ; Jim McGee ; Walter Date and place of birth: February 11, 1890, Rosedale, Ka. (USA) Date and place of death: August 21, 1974, Los Angeles, Cal. (USA) Nationality: USA Occupations, careers, etc.: Journalist, political activist, party leader, writer and editor Time of activity in Trotskyist movement: 1928 - 1974 (lifelong Trotskyist) Biographical sketch James P. Cannon was an outstanding example for American labour radicalism, a life-long devoted and unwaver­ ing socialist and internationalist, a co-founder of both the communist (in 1919/20) and the Trotskyist (in 1928/ 29) movement in the United States, the founder and long-time leader of the American Socialist Workers Party (SWP) and its predecessors as well as one of the most influential figures in the Trotskyist Fourth International (FI) during the first two decades of its existence. However, his features in the annals of Trotskyism are far away from being homogeneous, and it is a very truism that a man like Cannon must almost inevitably have caused much controversy. Undoubtedly being America's foremost Trotskyist and vigorously having coined the SWP, he on the one hand has been continuously worshipped and often monopolized by various epigones whereas on the other hand Trotskyist and ex-Trotskyist dissidents have considered him an embodiment of petrified orthodoxy or workerism or ultra-Leninist factionalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. Xxiv/Xxv (2018/2019) No 31–32
    THE INTERNATIONAL NEWSLETTER OF COMMUNIST STUDIES Der Internationale Newsletter der Kommunismusforschung La newsletter internationale des recherches sur le communisme Международный бюллетень исторических исследований коммунизма La Newsletter Internacional de Estudios sobre el Comunismo A Newsletter Internacional de Estudos sobre o Comunismo Edited by Bernhard H. Bayerlein and Gleb J. Albert VOL. XXIV/XXV (2018/2019) NO 31–32 Published by The European Workshop of Communist Studies With Support of the Institute of Social Movements and the Library of the Ruhr University Bochum ISSN 1862-698X http://incs.ub.rub.de The International Newsletter of Communist Studies XXIV/XXV (2018/19), nos. 31-32 2 Editors Bernhard H. Bayerlein Institute of Social Movements (ISB), University of Bochum, Germany [email protected] / [email protected] Gleb J. Albert Department of History, University of Zurich [email protected] Board of Correspondents Lars Björlin (Stockholm) Ottokar Luban (Berlin) Kasper Braskén (Åbo) Kevin McDermott (Sheffield) Hernán Camarero (Buenos Aires) Brendan McGeever (London) Cosroe Chaqueri † (Paris) Kevin Morgan (Manchester) Sonia Combe (Paris) Timur Mukhamatulin (New Brunswick) Mathieu Denis (Paris/Montréal) Manfred Mugrauer (Wien) Jean-François Fayet (Fribourg) Maria Luisa Nabinger (Rio de Janeiro) Jan Foitzik (Berlin) José Pacheco Pereira (Lisbon) Daniel Gaido (Córdoba, Argentina) Fredrik Petersson (Åbo/Stockholm) José Gotovitch (Bruxelles) Adriana Petra (Buenos Aires) Sobhanlal Datta Gupta (Calcutta) Kimmo Rentola
    [Show full text]