DOCSLIB.ORG

Contribution of Seed Banks Across Europe Towards the 2020 Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Targets, Assessed Through the ENSCONET Database S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Contribution of Seed Banks Across Europe Towards the 2020 Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Targets, Assessed Through the ENSCONET Database S Contribution of seed banks across Europe towards the 2020 Global Strategy for Plant Conservation targets, assessed through the ENSCONET database S. RIVIÈRE and J. V. MÜLLER TABLE S1 The 32 families not included in Euro+Med but covered by The Plant List, among others (synonyms according to The Plant List are shown in parentheses). Aizoaceae Anacardiaceae Buxaceae Caprifoliaceae (Dipsacaceae, Velarianaceae) Celastraceae Cistaceae Convolvulaceae Cucurbitaceae Elaeagnaceae Ericaceae (Empetraceae, Pyrolaceae) Frankeniaceae Boraginaceae (Hydrophyllaceae) Lauraceae Linaceae Malvaceae (Tiliaceae) Onagraceae Oxalidaceae Plantaginaceae (Callitrichaceae) Polemoniaceae Polygalaceae Polygonaceae Lythraceae (Punicaceae) Ranunculaceae Rhamnaceae Rubiaceae (Theligonaceae) Rutaceae Sapindaceae (Aceraceae, Hippocastanaceae) Scrophulariaceae (Myoporaceae) Staphyleaceae Tamaricaceae Violaceae Vitaceae TABLE S2 Number of accessions held for each threatened species for targets 8a and 8b of the 2011–2020 Global Strategy for Plant Conservation. Name of threatened species according to Taxonomic status* No. of No. of accessions the IUCN Red List 2015.4 & the 2011 accessions conserved ex situ by European Red List of Vascular Plants conserved ex ENSCONET, & situ by available for recovery ENSCONET and restoration (target 8a) programmes (target 8b) Abies nebrodensis Accepted EPM 0 0 Abies pinsapo Accepted EPM 5 3 Acis nicaeensis Accepted EPM 0 0 Aconitum corsicum Synonym TPL 2 0 Actinocarpus damasonium Synonym TPL 25 2 Adenocarpus ombriosus Accepted EPM 9 9 Aeonium balsamiferum Accepted EPM 0 0 Aeonium gomerense Accepted EPM 7 6 Aeonium saundersii Accepted EPM 2 1 Aethionema retsina Accepted EPM 2 2 Aichryson dumosum Accepted EPM 0 0 Aldrovanda generalis Synonym EPM 0 0 Aldrovanda verticillata Synonym EPM 0 0 Aldrovanda vesiculosa Accepted EPM 0 0 Alisma damasonium Synonym EPM 25 2 Alisma stellatum Synonym TPL 25 2 Alisma wahlenbergii Accepted EPM 0 0 Allium corsicum Accepted EPM 0 0 Allium pardoi Accepted EPM 0 0 Allium pyrenaicum Accepted EPM 0 0 Allium schmitzii Accepted EPM 1 0 Alyssum pyrenaicum Synonym EPM 0 0 Amsonia orientalis Accepted EPM 0 0 Anacamptis boryi Accepted EPM 0 0 Anacyclus depressus Synonym EPM 0 0 Anacyclus freynii Synonym EPM 0 0 Anacyclus pyrethrum Accepted EPM 0 0 Anagyris latifolia Unresolved TPL 45 43 Anchusa crispa Accepted EPM 3 0 Androcymbium gramineum Accepted EPM 4 4 Androcymbium psammophilum Synonym EPM 15 14 Androcymbium rechingeri Accepted EPM 15 5 Androrchis sitiaca Synonym EPM 0 0 Andryala crithmifolia Accepted EPM 0 0 Anemone pulsatilla Accepted TPL 25 15 Anemone uralensis Accepted TPL 0 0 Anthemis glaberrima Accepted EPM 12 0 Anthemis pyrethrum Synonym EPM 0 0 Antirrhinum charidemi Accepted EPM 17 11 Antirrhinum lopesianum Synonym EPM 3 0 Antirrhinum subbaeticum Unresolved TPL 6 5 Apium bermejoi Synonym EPM 4 4 Aquilegia barbaricina Accepted TPL 4 3 Aquilegia nuragica Accepted TPL 0 0 Arabis kennedyae Accepted EPM 4 3 Arbutus canariensis Accepted EPM 9 7 Arctophila fulva Accepted EPM 0 0 Arenaria bolosii Synonym TPL 3 1 Arenaria nevadensis Accepted EPM 0 0 Argyranthemum lidii Accepted EPM 18 17 Argyranthemum thalassophilum Accepted EPM 0 0 Argyranthemum winteri Accepted EPM 6 4 Armeria berlengensis Accepted EPM 0 0 Armeria helodes Accepted EPM 0 0 Armeria pseudarmeria Accepted EPM 8 2 Armeria purpurea Synonym EPM 1 1 Armeria sampaioi Accepted EPM 1 0 Armeria soleirolii Accepted EPM 2 0 Arrhenatherum pallens Accepted TPL 0 0 Artemisia granatensis Accepted EPM 17 12 Artemisia insipida Accepted EPM 0 0 Artemisia laciniata Accepted EPM 1 1 Artemisia molinieri Accepted EPM 1 1 Artemisia pancicii Accepted EPM 0 0 Arum purpureospathum Accepted EPM 4 1 Asparagus arborescens Accepted EPM 3 3 Asparagus equisetifolius Synonym EPM 3 3 Asparagus fallax Accepted EPM 3 3 Asparagus nesiotes Accepted EPM 0 0 Asparagus plocamoides Accepted EPM 9 9 Asparagus retrofractus Synonym EPM 3 3 Asphodelus bento-rainhae Accepted EPM 2 1 Aster pyrenaeus Accepted EPM 20 8 Aster sorrentinii Synonym TPL 1 0 Astragalus cavanillesii Accepted EPM 0 0 Astragalus drupaceus Accepted EPM 1 0 Astragalus maritimus Accepted EPM 2 1 Astragalus physocalyx Accepted EPM 1 0 Astragalus setosulus Accepted EPM 0 0 Astragalus tanaiticus Accepted EPM 0 0 Astragalus tremolsianus Accepted EPM 2 2 Astragalus verrucosus Accepted EPM 3 1 Asyneuma giganteum Accepted EPM 1 1 Athamanta cortiana Accepted EPM 0 0 Atractylis arbuscula Accepted EPM 0 0 Atractylis preauxiana Accepted EPM 40 40 Atriplex lanfrancoi Accepted EPM 0 0 Atropa baetica Accepted EPM 62 60 Aurinia uechtritziana Synonym EPM 1 0 Avena hackelii Synonym EPM 0 0 Avenula hackelii Synonym EPM 0 0 Azorina vidalii Accepted EPM 0 0 Barbarea dentata Synonym EPM 1 0 Barbarea lepuznica Synonym EPM 19 15 Barbarea vulgaris Accepted EPM 19 15 Barlia metlesicsiana Synonym EPM 1 1 Bassia saxicola Accepted EPM 0 0 Bellevalia webbiana Accepted EPM 0 0 Bencomia brachystachya Accepted EPM 9 9 Bencomia exstipulata Accepted EPM 29 27 Bencomia sphaerocarpa Accepted EPM 7 7 Beta adanensis Synonym EPM 0 0 Beta hastata Synonym EPM 10 3 Beta nana Accepted EPM 1 0 Beta patula Accepted EPM 0 0 Beta pumila Invalid designation 10 3 EPM Beta webbiana Synonym EPM 10 3 Bethencourtia hermosae Accepted EPM 4 4 Biscutella neustriaca Accepted EPM 2 1 Biscutella rotgesii Accepted EPM 1 0 Biscutella vincentina Synonym EPM 1 0 Borderea chouardii Synonym EPM 83 0 Brassica glabrescens Synonym EPM 0 0 Brassica hilarionis Accepted EPM 7 6 Brassica macrocarpa Accepted EPM 7 1 Braya linearis Accepted EPM 0 0 Brimeura duvigneaudii Accepted EPM 1 1 Bupleurum capillare Accepted EPM 4 4 Bupleurum dianthifolium Accepted TPL 0 0 Bupleurum elatum Accepted EPM 0 0 Bupleurum handiense Accepted EPM 8 8 Bupleurum kakiskalae Accepted EPM 4 1 Calamaria malinverniana Accepted TPL 0 0 Calendula maritima Synonym EPM 3 2 Callianthemum kernerianum Accepted TPL 0 0 Callitriche pulchra Accepted TPL 1 0 Campanula lanata Accepted EPM 1 1 Campanula sabatia Accepted EPM 0 0 Campanula scheuchzeri Accepted EPM 22 8 Canariothamnus hermosae Synonym EPM 4 4 Caralluma burchardii Accepted EPM 24 24 Carduus myriacanthus Accepted EPM 3 3 Carlina diae Accepted EPM 4 1 Carlina onopordifolia Synonym EPM 0 0 Caropsis verticillatoinundata Accepted EPM 0 0 Carthamus balearicus Accepted EPM 6 5 Centaurea akamantis Accepted EPM 9 7 Centaurea balearica Synonym EPM 6 5 Centaurea borjae Accepted EPM 2 0 Centaurea corensis Accepted EPM 0 0 Centaurea corymbosa Accepted EPM 3 3 Centaurea dubjanskyi Accepted EPM 0 0 Centaurea gadorensis Accepted EPM 3 2 Centaurea gymnocarpa Accepted EPM 1 1 Centaurea heldreichii Accepted EPM 0 0 Centaurea horrida Accepted EPM 0 0 Centaurea immanuelis-loewii Accepted EPM 1 0 Centaurea jankae Accepted EPM 0 0 Centaurea kalambakensis Accepted EPM 0 0 Centaurea lancifolia Accepted EPM 1 0 Centaurea niederi Accepted EPM 0 0 Centaurea peucedanifolia Accepted EPM 1 0 Centaurea princeps Accepted EPM 0 0 Centaurea pulvinata Accepted EPM 2 2 Centaurium somedanum Accepted EPM 46 7 Centranthus amazonum Accepted EPM 0 0 Centranthus trinervis Accepted TPL 1 1 Cephalanthera cucullata Accepted EPM 7 4 Cephalanthera epipactoides Accepted EPM 0 0 Cerastium dinaricum Accepted EPM 0 0 Cerastium sventenii Accepted EPM 3 2 Chamaemeles coriacea Accepted EPM 1 1 Cheirolophus crassifolius Accepted EPM 0 0 Cheirolophus duranii Accepted EPM 6 5 Cheirolophus falcisectus Accepted EPM 12 12 Cheirolophus ghomerythus Accepted EPM 0 0 Cheirolophus junonianus Accepted EPM 4 2 Cheirolophus massonianus Accepted EPM 0 0 Cheirolophus metlesicsii Accepted EPM 6 5 Cheirolophus santos-abreui Accepted EPM 3 3 Cheirolophus satarataensis Accepted EPM 0 0 Cheirolophus tagananensis Accepted EPM 2 1 Chrysanthemum flosculosum Synonym EPM 7 2 Cicer canariense Accepted EPM 9 8 Cicer graecum Accepted EPM 0 0 Cineraria malvifolia Synonym EPM 0 0 Cistus chinamadensis Accepted TPL 2 0 Clinopodium taygeteum Accepted EPM 0 0 Cochlearia polonica Accepted EPM 1 0 Cochlearia tatrae Accepted EPM 6 0 Coincya rupestris Accepted EPM 12 4 Colchicum corsicum Accepted EPM 0 0 Consolida samia Accepted TPL 0 0 Convolvulus argyrothamnos Accepted TPL 5 0 Convolvulus fernandesii Accepted TPL 8 0 Convolvulus lopezsocasii Accepted TPL 5 5 Convolvulus massonii Accepted TPL 0 0 Coristospermum huteri Synonym EPM 7 7 Coronopus navasii Accepted EPM 8 4 Crambe arborea Accepted EPM 5 4 Crambe feuilleei Accepted TPL 1 1 Crambe gomeraea Accepted EPM 0 0 Crambe laevigata Accepted EPM 4 2 Crambe microcarpa Accepted EPM 3 2 Crambe pritzelii Accepted EPM 17 14 Crambe scaberrima Accepted EPM 10 7 Crambe scoparia Accepted EPM 6 5 Crambe sventenii Accepted EPM 33 32 Crambe tamadabensis Accepted TPL 4 2 Crambe wildpretii Accepted TPL 1 0 Crataegus nigra Accepted EPM 0 0 Cremnophyton lanfrancoi Synonym EPM 0 0 Crepis crocifolia Synonym EPM 0 0 Crepis granatensis Accepted EPM 6 6 Crepis nigrescens Accepted EPM 0 0 Crepis purpurea Accepted EPM 0 0 Crocus cyprius Accepted EPM 5 4 Crocus hartmannianus Accepted EPM 3 3 Cynoglossum albanicum Synonym EPM 0 0 Cytisus aeolicus Accepted EPM 1 1 Cytisus rosmarinifolius Unresolved TPL 1 0 Dactylorhiza iberica Accepted EPM 0 0 Dactylorhiza kalopissii Accepted EPM 0 0 Dactylorhiza macedonica Synonym EPM 0 0 Dactylorhiza pythagorae Synonym EPM 0 0 Damasonium alisma Accepted EPM 25 2 Damasonium damasonium Synonym EPM 25 2 Damasonium polyspermum Accepted EPM 5 5 Damasonium stellatum Synonym EPM 25 2 Daphne rodriguezii Accepted EPM 7 6 Delphinium caseyi Synonym TPL 0 0 Dendriopoterium pulidoi Accepted EPM 9 9 Dianthus
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Top100amea.Pdf
    Editores / Editores José Luis Martín Esquivel Manuel Arechavaleta Hernández Paulo A. V. Borges Bernardo F. Faria Edición y financiación / Ediçao e financiamento INTERREG III-B BIONATURA Dirección General del Medio Natural, Gobierno de Canarias ARENA, Governo Regional dos Açores Direcção Regional do Ambiente, Governo Regional da Madeira Modo de citar la obra / Modo de fazer mençao a obra Cuando se hace referencia a la obra / Quando fazer refêrencia a obra: MARTÍN, J. L., M. ARECHAVALETA, P. A. V. BORGES & B. FARIA (eds.). 2008. Top 100. Las 100 especies amenazadas prio- ritarias de gestión en la región europea biogeográfica de la Macaronesia. Consejería de Medio Ambiente y Ordenación Territorial, Gobierno de Canarias. 500 pp. Cuando se hace referencia a un capítulo de la obra / Quando fazer refêrencia a um capítulo da obra: FARIA, B. F., C. ABREU, A. F. AGUIAR, J. AUGUSTO, R. JARDIM, C. LOBO, P. OLIVEIRA & D. TEIXEIRA. 2008. La perspectiva archipe- lágica: Madeira. En: MARTÍN, J. L., M. ARECHAVALETA, P. A. V. BORGES & B. FARIA (eds.). Top 100. Las 100 especies ame- nazadas prioritarias de gestión en la región europea biogeográfica de la Macaronesia. Consejería de Medio Ambiente y Ordenación Territorial, Gobierno de Canarias. pp.: 109-128. Cuando se hace referencia a una ficha de especie /Quando fazer refêrencia a uma ficha de espécie: MARTINS, M., M. MOURA & L. SILVA. 2008. Azorina vidalii (H.C. Watson) Feer. En: MARTÍN, J. L., M. ARECHAVALETA, P. A. V. BORGES & B. FARIA (eds.). Top 100. Las 100 especies amenazadas prioritarias de gestión en la región europea biogeográfica de la Macaronesia. Consejería de Medio Ambiente y Ordenación Territorial, Gobierno de Ca- narias.
    [Show full text]
  • H3.3 Macaronesian Inland Cliff
    European Red List of Habitats - Screes Habitat Group H3.3 Macaronesian inland cliff Summary The perennial vegetation of crevices and ledges of cliff faces in Macaronesia away from coastal salt-spray is of very diverse character - some, for example, dominated by succulents, others rich in ferns and bryophytes characteristic of shaded situations - and it includes several hundreds of taxa endemic to the archipelagoes. The main threats are mountaineering and rock climbing, outdoor sports and leisure activities, and construction of infrastructures such as roads and motorways. Synthesis There is no evidence of significant past reductions, either in the last 50 years or historically, and also future prospects are good, as no serious threats are envisaged, besides touristic/leisure activities and putative faulty environmental impact assessments that may overlook this habitat as valuable. Reduction in quantity, reduction in quality and criteria of geographic distribution yield the Least Concern (LC) category. In spite of the LC category, conservation policy and management should restrict to the maximum any threat to or reduction of the habitat, as it has a very high conservation value, because of high endemism of species and communities with many local and regional variaties. Overall Category & Criteria EU 28 EU 28+ Red List Category Red List Criteria Red List Category Red List Criteria Least Concern - Least Concern - Sub-habitat types that may require further examination Four general subtypes can be distinguished based on species composition and different ecological conditions. However, at present, no data are available to carry out an individual assessment of each of them. In the future, if detailed plot sampling has been carried out, such an evaluation may be possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Karyologická Variabilita Vybraných Taxonů Rodu Allium V Evropě Alena
    UNIVERZITA PALACKÉHO V OLOMOUCI Přírodov ědecká fakulta Katedra botaniky Karyologická variabilita vybraných taxon ů rodu Allium v Evrop ě Diplomová práce Alena VÁ ŇOVÁ obor: T ělesná výchova - Biologie Prezen ční studium Vedoucí práce: RNDr. Martin Duchoslav, Ph.D. Olomouc 2011 Prohlašuji, že jsem zadanou diplomovou práci vypracovala samostatn ě s použitím citované literatury a konzultací. V Olomouci dne: 14.1.2011 ................................................. Pod ěkování Ráda bych pod ěkovala všem, co mi v jakémkoli ohledu pomohli. P ředevším svému vedoucímu diplomové práce RNDr. Martinu Duchoslavovi, PhD., a to nejen za cenné rady a pomoc p ři práci, ale p ředevším za velké množství trp ělivosti. Stejn ě tak d ěkuji Mgr. Míše Jandové za veškerý čas, který mi v ěnovala, Tereze P ěnkavové za pomoc ve skleníku a odd ělení fytopatologie za možnost využívat jejich laborato ří. Samoz řejm ě mé díky pat ří i všem blízkým, kte ří m ě po dobu studia podporovali. Bibliografická identifikace Jméno a p říjmení autora : Alena Vá ňová Název práce : Karyologická variabilita vybraných taxon ů rodu Allium v Evrop ě. Typ práce : Diplomová Pracovišt ě: Katedra botaniky, P řírodov ědecká fakulta Univerzity Palackého v Olomouci Vedoucí práce : RNDr. Martin Duchoslav, Ph.D. Rok obhajoby práce : 2011 Abstrakt : Diplomová práce m ěla za cíl postihnout karyologickou variabilitu (chromozomový po čet, ploidní úrove ň a DNA-ploidní úrove ň) a velikost jaderné DNA (2C) vybraných taxon ů rodu Allium pro populace získané z různých částí Evropy. Celkov ě bylo pomocí karyologických metod prov ěř eno 550 jedinc ů u 14 taxon ů rodu Allium : A. albidum, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Globalna Strategija Ohranjanja Rastlinskih
    GLOBALNA STRATEGIJA OHRANJANJA RASTLINSKIH VRST (TOČKA 8) UNIVERSITY BOTANIC GARDENS LJUBLJANA AND GSPC TARGET 8 HORTUS BOTANICUS UNIVERSITATIS LABACENSIS, SLOVENIA INDEX SEMINUM ANNO 2017 COLLECTORUM GLOBALNA STRATEGIJA OHRANJANJA RASTLINSKIH VRST (TOČKA 8) UNIVERSITY BOTANIC GARDENS LJUBLJANA AND GSPC TARGET 8 Recenzenti / Reviewers: Dr. sc. Sanja Kovačić, stručna savjetnica Botanički vrt Biološkog odsjeka Prirodoslovno-matematički fakultet, Sveučilište u Zagrebu muz. svet./ museum councilor/ dr. Nada Praprotnik Naslovnica / Front cover: Semeska banka / Seed bank Foto / Photo: J. Bavcon Foto / Photo: Jože Bavcon, Blanka Ravnjak Urednika / Editors: Jože Bavcon, Blanka Ravnjak Tehnični urednik / Tehnical editor: D. Bavcon Prevod / Translation: GRENS-TIM d.o.o. Elektronska izdaja / E-version Leto izdaje / Year of publication: 2018 Kraj izdaje / Place of publication: Ljubljana Izdal / Published by: Botanični vrt, Oddelek za biologijo, Biotehniška fakulteta UL Ižanska cesta 15, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenija tel.: +386(0) 1 427-12-80, www.botanicni-vrt.si, [email protected] Zanj: znan. svet. dr. Jože Bavcon Botanični vrt je del mreže raziskovalnih infrastrukturnih centrov © Botanični vrt Univerze v Ljubljani / University Botanic Gardens Ljubljana ----------------------------------- Kataložni zapis o publikaciji (CIP) pripravili v Narodni in univerzitetni knjižnici v Ljubljani COBISS.SI-ID=297076224 ISBN 978-961-6822-51-0 (pdf) ----------------------------------- 1 Kazalo / Index Globalna strategija ohranjanja rastlinskih vrst (točka 8)
    [Show full text]
  • Establishment of a Global Network for the in Situ Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives: Status and Needs
    THEMATIC BACKGROUND STUDY Establishment of a Global Network for the In Situ Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives: Status and Needs Nigel Maxted and Shelagh Kell BACKGROUND STUDY PAPER NO. 39 October 2009 COMMISSION ON GENETIC RESOURCES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ESTABLISHMENT OF A GLOBAL NETWORK FOR THE IN SITU CONSERVATION OF CROP WILD RELATIVES: STATUS AND NEEDS by *By Nigel Maxted and Shelagh Kell The content of this document is entirely the responsibility of the authors, and does not .necessarily represent the views of the FAO, or its Members 2 * School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham. Disclaimer The content of this document is entirely the responsibility of the authors, and does not necessarily represent the views of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), or its Members. The designations employed and the presentation of material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of FAO concerning legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. CONTENTS SUMMARY 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 7 PART 1: INTRODUCTION 8 1.1 Background and scope 8 1.2 The global and local importance of crop wild relatives 10 1.3 Definition of a crop wild relative 12 1.4 Global numbers of crop
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    National Strategy for the Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives of Spain María Luisa Rubio Teso, José M. Iriondo, Mauricio Parra & Elena Torres PGR Secure: Novel characterization of crop wild relative and landrace resources as a basis for improved crop breeding The research reported here was made possible with funding from the EU Seventh Framework Programme. PGR Secure is a collaborative project funded under the EU Seventh Framework Programme, THEME KBBE.2010.1.1-03, ‘Characterization of biodiversity resources for wild crop relatives to improve crops by breeding’, Grant Agreement no. 266394. The information published in this report reflects the views of PGR Secure partner, URJC. The European Union is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained herein. Acknowledgements: We are grateful to Cristina Ronquillo Ferrero and Aarón Nebreda Trejo who collaborated in the process of data gathering and data analysis for the generation of this strategy. We are also grateful to Lori De Hond for her help with proof reading and linguistic assistance. Front Cover Picture: Lupinus angustifolius L., by Rubén Milla 2 Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 5 2 Prioritization of Crop Wild Relatives in Spain ................................................................ 6 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 6 2.2 Methods .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Europe's Threatened Plants
    Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation By Suzanne Sharrock and Meirion Jones May 2009 Recommended citation: Sharrock, S. and Jones, M., 2009. Conserving Europe’s threatened plants: Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Botanic Gardens Conservation International, Richmond, UK ISBN 978-1-905164-30-1 Published by Botanic Gardens Conservation International Descanso House, 199 Kew Road, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3BW, UK Design: John Morgan, [email protected] Acknowledgements The work of establishing a consolidated list of threatened Photo credits European plants was first initiated by Hugh Synge who developed the original database on which this report is based. All images are credited to BGCI with the exceptions of: We are most grateful to Hugh for providing this database to page 5, Nikos Krigas; page 8. Christophe Libert; page 10, BGCI and advising on further development of the list. The Pawel Kos; page 12 (upper), Nikos Krigas; page 14: James exacting task of inputting data from national Red Lists was Hitchmough; page 16 (lower), Jože Bavcon; page 17 (upper), carried out by Chris Cockel and without his dedicated work, the Nkos Krigas; page 20 (upper), Anca Sarbu; page 21, Nikos list would not have been completed. Thank you for your efforts Krigas; page 22 (upper) Simon Williams; page 22 (lower), RBG Chris. We are grateful to all the members of the European Kew; page 23 (upper), Jo Packet; page 23 (lower), Sandrine Botanic Gardens Consortium and other colleagues from Europe Godefroid; page 24 (upper) Jože Bavcon; page 24 (lower), Frank who provided essential advice, guidance and supplementary Scumacher; page 25 (upper) Michael Burkart; page 25, (lower) information on the species included in the database.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetics of Tribe Orchideae (Orchidaceae: Orchidoideae)
    Annals of Botany 110: 71–90, 2012 doi:10.1093/aob/mcs083, available online at www.aob.oxfordjournals.org Phylogenetics of tribe Orchideae (Orchidaceae: Orchidoideae) based on combined DNA matrices: inferences regarding timing of diversification and evolution of pollination syndromes Luis A. Inda1,*, Manuel Pimentel2 and Mark W. Chase3 1Escuela Polite´cnica Superior de Huesca, Universidad de Zaragoza, carretera de Cuarte sn. 22071 Huesca, Spain, 2Facultade de Ciencias, Universidade da Corun˜a, Campus da Zapateira sn. 15071 A Corun˜a, Spain and 3Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK * For correspondence. E-mail [email protected] Received: 3 November 2011 Returned for revision: 9 December 2011 Accepted: 1 March 2012 Published electronically: 25 April 2012 † Background and aims Tribe Orchideae (Orchidaceae: Orchidoideae) comprises around 62 mostly terrestrial genera, which are well represented in the Northern Temperate Zone and less frequently in tropical areas of both the Old and New Worlds. Phylogenetic relationships within this tribe have been studied previously using only nuclear ribosomal DNA (nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer, nrITS). However, different parts of the phylogenetic tree in these analyses were weakly supported, and integrating information from different plant genomes is clearly necessary in orchids, where reticulate evolution events are putatively common. The aims of this study were to: (1) obtain a well-supported and dated phylogenetic hypothesis for tribe Orchideae, (ii) assess appropriateness of recent nomenclatural changes in this tribe in the last decade, (3) detect possible examples of reticulate evolution and (4) analyse in a temporal context evolutionary trends for subtribe Orchidinae with special emphasis on pollination systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Interspecific Hybridization Between Durum Wheat and Aegilops Umbellulata (Zhuk.)
    713 Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 18 (No 5) 2012, 713-721 Agricultural Academy INTERSPECIFIC HYBRIDIZATION BETWEEN DURUM WHEAT AND AEGILOPS UMBELLULATA (ZHUK.) B. HADZHIIVANOVA, V. BOZHANOVA and D. DECHEV Field Crops Institute, BG - 6200 Chirpan, Bulgaria Abstract HADZHIIVANOVA, B., V. BOZHANOVA and D. DECHEV, 2012. Interspecific hybridization between durum wheat and Aegilops umbellulata (Zhuk.). Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 18: 713-721 The possibility for obtaining of interspecific hybrids between three durum wheat genotypes (Triticum durum, 2n = 4x = 28, AABB genomes) and one accession of Aegilops umbellulata (2n = 2x = 18, UU genome) during two different seasons has been studied. A low crossability rate of 3% average for all genotypes over two years was achieved. The observed variation of crossability is due to a greatest extent to the genotype of durum wheat parent with 82.91% from total variation. Hybrid plants were obtained only by means of embryo rescue method. The ability for in vitro regeneration was still independent of crossability of used durum wheat genotypes. All received F1 hybrids plants were identical they exhibited good tillering ability and manifested traits from both parents. In spite of the observed partially fertility in F1 hybrids between durum wheat and Aegilops umbellulata no germination of the hybrid seeds was ascertained. BC1 seeds were obtained from F1 hybrids of hybrid combination Beloslava × Aegilops umbellulata after backcrossing to the durum wheat parent. An increase of crossability with advancing of backcross progenies – from 1.6% in BC1 hybrids to 26.2% in BC2 hybrids has been found. Meiotic abnormalities including dyads and triads at the end of microsporogenesis as well as uninucleate microspores with a different shape and size were observed suggesting production of unreduced gametes in this cross.
    [Show full text]
  • Biotechnological Approaches in Strawberry Tree (Arbutus Unedo L.) Breedi̇ Ng
    36 Review Article Ekin Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics (2015) 1-1:36-41 www.ekinjournal.com Biotechnological approaches in strawberry tree (Arbutus unedo L.) breedi̇ ng Aysun Cavuşoğlu1,2 Melekber Sulusoglu1,2 Suleyman Erkal1 1Kocaeli University, Arslanbey Agricultural Vocational School, TR-41285, Kocaeli/Turkey. 2Kocaeli University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Horticulture, TR-41380, Kocaeli/Turkey. Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] Citation: Cavusoglu A, Sulusoglu M and Erkal S 2015. Biotechnological approaches in strawberry tree (Arbutus unedo L.) breeding. Ekin J Crop Breed and Gen 1-1:36-41. Received: 07.06.2014 Accepted: 27.10.2014 Published Online: 15.01.2015 Printed: 25.01.2015 ABSTRACT Arbutus unedo L. (Strawberry tree) belongs to Ericaceae family, is an evergreen shrub or tree, mostly known around Mediterranean region in natural habitat, has valuable medicinal and aromatic properties. The plant is mainly used for its edible fruits. In addition, A. unedo have increasing importance in afforestration programmes, beekeeping facilities, ornamental purposes and elucidating plant physiology. Therefore, the species is seemingly a promising fruit plant. Orchards are very limited but increasing demand to the plant will result in initiations of establishment new fruit orchards with superior genotypes viz. tolerant to the abiotic stress, resistant to pests and diseases, rich contents in terms of valuable compounds, convenience to postharvest operations, being visually preferable and suitable to target climate. Plant breeding is an important component to overcome elimination of unwanted features and to reach admirable characters. The main steps in breeding are effective selection, succesfully adaptation and inheritance via transferring the features to subsequent generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Centranthus Trinervis (Viv.) Bég
    CENTRANTHUS TRINERVIS - CBNC Centranthus trinervis (Viv.) Bég. Nom d’espèce ● Centranthus trinervis (Viv.) Bég. (+ synonymes) ● Centranthus nervosus Moris ● Valeriana trinervis Viv. Taxonomie ● Ordre : Dipsacales ● Famille : CAPRIFOLIACEAE Noms communs ● Français : Centrante trinervé Description ● Plante vivace, glabre et glauque, en touffes, à souche épaisse. Tiges de 20 à 40 cm, dressées, striées, creuses. Feuilles opposées, entières, oblongues-ovales, à plusieurs nervures divergentes. Inflorescence en panicule corymbiforme. Fleurs à corolle petite (2 à 5 mm), blanche à rosée, à éperon très petit, réduit à une bosse plus courte que l'ovaire. Fruits de 2-3 mm, glabres, surmontés de soies plumeuses. ● Type biologique : Hémicryptophyte. Photos 1 CENTRANTHUS TRINERVIS - CBNC Biologie ● Période de floraison : avril-juin. ● Période de fructification : mai-juin. ● Pollinisation : par les insectes. ● Stratégie de dispersion : Les semences sont disséminées par le vent (anémochorie) grâce aux pappus plumeux présents sur les fruits. N éanmoins, certains akènes n’en possèdent pas, la dissémination se fait alors à proximité ou en contrebas des pieds- mères (barochorie). Ecologie ● Etage de végétation : thermoméditerranéen ● Milieu : La plante croit dans les fissures et sur les replats de falaises granitiques très abruptes, en exposition nord-est et nord- ouest, entre 150 et 200 m d’altitude. ● Habitat : 8220.20 : Falaises siliceuses thermophiles de Corse. ● Substrat : Granite Photos d’habitat 2 CENTRANTHUS TRINERVIS - CBNC 3 CENTRANTHUS TRINERVIS - CBNC Distribution L’espèce est endémique stricte de Corse. Les populations sardes, historiquement rattachées à C. trinervis, sont bien séparées géographiquement et écologiquement et ont été individualisées sous l'appellation Centranthus amazonum Fridl. (A. Fridlender, A. Raynal-Roques, 1998). Ce taxon est extrêmement localisé, puisque la totalité de la population connue se résume à une seule station comprenant de 100 à 145 individus, implantés sur les falaises granitiques du Massif de la Trinité (commune de Bonifacio).
    [Show full text]
  • DISSERTAÇÃO José Roseno De Mendonça Filho.Pdf
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE PERNAMBUCO CENTRO DE BIOCIÊNCIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE GENÉTICA PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS JOSÉ ROSENO DE MENDONÇA FILHO DIVERSIDADE CARIOTÍPICA EM REPRESENTANTES DO COMPLEXO CRYPTANTHOID (BROMELIOIDEAE, BROMELIACEAE) Recife 2019 JOSÉ ROSENO DE MENDONÇA FILHO DIVERSIDADE CARIOTÍPICA EM REPRESENTANTES DO COMPLEXO CRYPTANTHOID (BROMELIOIDEAE, BROMELIACEAE) Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós- Graduação em Ciências Biológicas, Área de Concentração Genética, da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, como requisito para obtenção do título de mestre em Ciências Biológicas. Orientadora: Profa. Dra. Ana Maria Benko Iseppon Coorientadores: Profa. Dra. Ana Christina Brasileiro-Vidal Prof. Dr Jaílson Gitai dos Santos Frazão Recife 2019 JOSÉ ROSENO DE MENDONÇA FILHO DIVERSIDADE CARIOTÍPICA EM REPRESENTANTES DO COMPLEXO CRYPTANTHOID (BROMELIOIDEAE, BROMELIACEAE) Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas, Área de Concentração Genética, da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, como requisito para obtenção do título de mestre em Ciências Biológicas. Aprovada em: 23/07/2019 COMISSÃO EXAMINADORA ___________________________________________ Profa. Dra. Ana Maria Benko Iseppon UFPE (Orientadora) ___________________________________________ Profa. Dra. Maria Betânia de Oliveira Melo UFPE (Membro Interno) ____________________________________________ Prof. Dr. Geyner Alves dos Santos Cruz UPE – Campus de Petrolina (Membro Externo) MEMBROS SUPLENTES ____________________________________________
    [Show full text]