Department of Defense Authorization for Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2015 and the Future Years Defense Program

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Department of Defense Authorization for Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2015 and the Future Years Defense Program S. HRG. 113–465, PT. 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015 AND THE FUTURE YEARS DEFENSE PROGRAM HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON S. 2410 TO AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015 FOR MILITARY ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FOR MILITARY CON- STRUCTION, AND FOR DEFENSE ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, TO PRESCRIBE MILITARY PERSONNEL STRENGTHS FOR SUCH FISCAL YEAR, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES PART 4 AIRLAND APRIL 8 AND 9, 2014 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on Armed Services VerDate Nov 24 2008 10:38 Jan 21, 2015 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 6011 Z:\DOCS\91189.TXT JUNE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015 AND THE FUTURE YEARS DEFENSE PROGRAM—Part 4 AIRLAND VerDate Nov 24 2008 10:38 Jan 21, 2015 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 Z:\DOCS\91189.TXT JUNE S. HRG. 113–465, PT. 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015 AND THE FUTURE YEARS DEFENSE PROGRAM HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON S. 2410 TO AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015 FOR MILITARY ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FOR MILITARY CON- STRUCTION, AND FOR DEFENSE ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, TO PRESCRIBE MILITARY PERSONNEL STRENGTHS FOR SUCH FISCAL YEAR, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES PART 4 AIRLAND APRIL 8 AND 9, 2014 Printed for the use of the Committee on Armed Services ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 91–189 PDF WASHINGTON : 2015 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 10:38 Jan 21, 2015 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 Z:\DOCS\91189.TXT JUNE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES CARL LEVIN, Michigan, Chairman JACK REED, Rhode Island JAMES M. INHOFE, Oklahoma BILL NELSON, Florida JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona CLAIRE MCCASKILL, Missouri JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama MARK UDALL, Colorado SAXBY CHAMBLISS, Georgia KAY R. HAGAN, North Carolina ROGER F. WICKER, Mississippi JOE MANCHIN III, West Virginia KELLY AYOTTE, New Hampshire JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire DEB FISCHER, Nebraska KIRSTEN E. GILLIBRAND, New York LINDSEY GRAHAM, South Carolina RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, Connecticut DAVID VITTER, Louisiana JOE DONNELLY, Indiana ROY BLUNT, Missouri MAZIE K. HIRONO, Hawaii MIKE LEE, Utah TIM KAINE, Virginia TED CRUZ, Texas ANGUS KING, Maine PETER K. LEVINE, Staff Director JOHN A. BONSELL, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON AIRLAND RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, Connecticut, Chairman BILL NELSON, Florida ROGER F. WICKER, Mississippi CLAIRE MCCASKILL, MissourI JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona JOE MANCHIN III, West Virginia JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama KIRSTEN E. GILLIBRAND, New York SAXBY CHAMBLISS, Georgia JOE DONNELLY, Indiana ROY BLUNT, Missouri (II) VerDate Nov 24 2008 10:38 Jan 21, 2015 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 Z:\DOCS\91189.TXT JUNE C O N T E N T S APRIL 8, 2014 Page TACTICAL AIRCRAFT PROGRAMS ............................................................................... 1 Bogdan, Lt. Gen. Christopher C., USAF, Program Executive Officer, F–35 Lightning II Joint Program Office ...................................................................... 5 Davis, Lt. Gen. Charles R., USAF, Military Deputy to the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition ........................................................................... 15 Grosklags, VADM Paul A., USN, Principal Military Deputy to the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development, and Acquisition; Accom- panied by LtGen Robert E. Schmidle, Jr., USMC, Deputy Commandant for Aviation ........................................................................................................... 24 Questions for the Record ......................................................................................... 52 APRIL 9, 2014 ARMY MODERNIZATION ............................................................................................. 55 Campbell, GEN John F., USA, Vice Chief of Staff, U.S. Army; Accompanied by LTG James O. Barclay III, USA, Deputy Chief of Staff, G–8, U.S. Army; and LTG Michael E. Williamson, USA, Military Deputy and Director, Army Acquisition Corps, Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology ......................................................... 60 Questions for the Record ......................................................................................... 88 (III) VerDate Nov 24 2008 10:38 Jan 21, 2015 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 Z:\DOCS\91189.TXT JUNE VerDate Nov 24 2008 10:38 Jan 21, 2015 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 Z:\DOCS\91189.TXT JUNE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015 AND THE FUTURE YEARS DEFENSE PROGRAM TUESDAY, APRIL 8, 2014 U.S. SENATE, SUBCOMMITTEE ON AIRLAND, COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES, Washington, DC. TACTICAL AIRCRAFT PROGRAMS The subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 3:36 p.m. in room SR–232A, Russell Senate Office Building, Senator Richard Blumenthal (chairman of the subcommittee) presiding. Committee members present: Senators Blumenthal, Donnelly, McCain, Sessions, and Wicker. OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, CHAIRMAN Senator BLUMENTHAL. The subcommittee will come to order. As you can tell, this is my first subcommittee meeting. I am very pleased to be joined by my colleague, Senator McCain, who is pinch hitting temporarily for Senator Wicker. I want to extend a welcome to each of our witnesses. Thank you very much for your service. Thank you for being here today. We are joined by Lieutenant General Christopher C. Bogdan of the U.S. Air Force, Lieutenant General Charles R. Davis of the U.S. Air Force, Vice Admiral Paul A. Grosklags of the U.S. Navy, and Lieutenant General Robert E. Schmidle, Jr., of the U.S. Ma- rine Corps. I want to thank each of you again for representing the men and women of our Armed Forces so ably and for the great job they do around the globe, in the continuing war in Afghanistan, and else- where. We keep them in our thoughts and prayers, as I know you do. Our witnesses this afternoon face really huge challenges as they strive to balance the need to support ongoing operations and sus- tain readiness with the need to modernize and keep the techno- logical edge that is so critical to our military success. These chal- lenges, as you well know, have been made particularly difficult by the spending caps imposed by the Budget Control Act (BCA). Those caps which bedevil us all were modestly relieved for fiscal year 2015 in the Bipartisan Budget Act (BBA) that we enacted earlier (1) VerDate Nov 24 2008 10:38 Jan 21, 2015 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 Z:\DOCS\91189.TXT JUNE 2 this year, but they are scheduled to resume in full blast in 2016 and beyond. These caps seriously challenge our ability to meet our national security needs and they have already forced military de- partments to make painful tradeoffs. Unless they are modified after fiscal year 2015, they will threaten our long-term national se- curity interests, and no one knows those facts better than the mili- tary leaders who are with us today. Every year we are challenged to make decisions balancing a number of competing demands for resources, including resources for current operations, and investment in future modernization. In this case, we will be assessing plans and programs regarding the current status and future prospects for tactical aviation programs. We meet today to talk about the F–35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) and the other aviation programs. We all know that the JSF pro- gram is important since it has been central to the long-term mod- ernization plans for all the relevant Services—Air Force, Navy, Ma- rine Corps—for more than 15 years now. Given that fact, any change in the cost, schedule, performance of that JSF program sends shock waves literally through the Departmentof Defense (DOD) and raises many questions of achieving that balance be- tween the demands of maintaining readiness in the near future and those of modernizing for tomorrow. For instance, the Govern- ment Accountability Office (GAO) has estimated that extending the service lives of existing F–16 and F–18 aircraft would cost about $5 billion. So today we are going to seek a better understanding of imple- mentation of the corrective actions DOD identified in the JSF pro- gram after Nunn-McCurdy certification 4 years ago and what levels of risk remain in the development and fielding program. I know that a number of you have seen problems in testing since last year, and while we are always concerned anytime we hear about problems during research and development, I understand that you have identified the problems and have mapped a way ahead, a path to deal with these problems to minimize the effect of the problems on testing and development programs. I hope you will discuss these problems very specifically and fully during your testimony. There have also been some other problems. I hope you will discuss those as well. I know you will be very frank and forth- coming with the subcommittee, as you have been customarily. The subcommittee has been following the Department of the Navy’s attempts to reduce the JSF shortfall to manageable levels. Five years ago, the Department of the Navy was estimating that we would be facing a shortfall in 2017 that optimistically would amount of 125 tactical fighters needed to outfit our 10 aircraft car- rier air wings and 3 Marine Corps air wings. Then 3 years ago, based on further analysis, the Navy was estimating the maximum shortfall could be nearly twice that large, or roughly 250 aircraft. But in the past several years, the Navy and the Marine Corps have taken action, such as reducing the squadron size, conducting serv- ice life extensions on some aircraft, and reducing the time aircraft spend in depots.
Recommended publications
  • 2014 Ships and Submarines of the United States Navy
    AIRCRAFT CARRIER DDG 1000 AMPHIBIOUS Multi-Purpose Aircraft Carrier (Nuclear-Propulsion) THE U.S. NAvy’s next-GENERATION MULTI-MISSION DESTROYER Amphibious Assault Ship Gerald R. Ford Class CVN Tarawa Class LHA Gerald R. Ford CVN-78 USS Peleliu LHA-5 John F. Kennedy CVN-79 Enterprise CVN-80 Nimitz Class CVN Wasp Class LHD USS Wasp LHD-1 USS Bataan LHD-5 USS Nimitz CVN-68 USS Abraham Lincoln CVN-72 USS Harry S. Truman CVN-75 USS Essex LHD-2 USS Bonhomme Richard LHD-6 USS Dwight D. Eisenhower CVN-69 USS George Washington CVN-73 USS Ronald Reagan CVN-76 USS Kearsarge LHD-3 USS Iwo Jima LHD-7 USS Carl Vinson CVN-70 USS John C. Stennis CVN-74 USS George H.W. Bush CVN-77 USS Boxer LHD-4 USS Makin Island LHD-8 USS Theodore Roosevelt CVN-71 SUBMARINE Submarine (Nuclear-Powered) America Class LHA America LHA-6 SURFACE COMBATANT Los Angeles Class SSN Tripoli LHA-7 USS Bremerton SSN-698 USS Pittsburgh SSN-720 USS Albany SSN-753 USS Santa Fe SSN-763 Guided Missile Cruiser USS Jacksonville SSN-699 USS Chicago SSN-721 USS Topeka SSN-754 USS Boise SSN-764 USS Dallas SSN-700 USS Key West SSN-722 USS Scranton SSN-756 USS Montpelier SSN-765 USS La Jolla SSN-701 USS Oklahoma City SSN-723 USS Alexandria SSN-757 USS Charlotte SSN-766 Ticonderoga Class CG USS City of Corpus Christi SSN-705 USS Louisville SSN-724 USS Asheville SSN-758 USS Hampton SSN-767 USS Albuquerque SSN-706 USS Helena SSN-725 USS Jefferson City SSN-759 USS Hartford SSN-768 USS Bunker Hill CG-52 USS Princeton CG-59 USS Gettysburg CG-64 USS Lake Erie CG-70 USS San Francisco SSN-711 USS Newport News SSN-750 USS Annapolis SSN-760 USS Toledo SSN-769 USS Mobile Bay CG-53 USS Normandy CG-60 USS Chosin CG-65 USS Cape St.
    [Show full text]
  • Coast Guard Awards CIM 1560 25D(PDF)
    Medals and Awards Manual COMDTINST M1650.25D MAY 2008 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. Commandant 1900 Half Street, S.W. United States Coast Guard Washington, DC 20593-0001 Staff Symbol: CG-12 Phone: (202) 475-5222 COMDTINST M1650.25D 5 May 2008 COMMANDANT INSTRUCTION M1625.25D Subj: MEDALS AND AWARDS MANUAL 1. PURPOSE. This Manual publishes a revision of the Medals and Awards Manual. This Manual is applicable to all active and reserve Coast Guard members and other Service members assigned to duty within the Coast Guard. 2. ACTION. Area, district, and sector commanders, commanders of maintenance and logistics commands, Commander, Deployable Operations Group, commanding officers of headquarters units, and assistant commandants for directorates, Judge Advocate General, and special staff offices at Headquarters shall ensure that the provisions of this Manual are followed. Internet release is authorized. 3. DIRECTIVES AFFECTED. Coast Guard Medals and Awards Manual, COMDTINST M1650.25C and Coast Guard Rewards and Recognition Handbook, CG Publication 1650.37 are cancelled. 4. MAJOR CHANGES. Major changes in this revision include: clarification of Operational Distinguishing Device policy, award criteria for ribbons and medals established since the previous edition of the Manual, guidance for prior service members, clarification and expansion of administrative procedures and record retention requirements, and new and updated enclosures. 5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS/CONSIDERATIONS. Environmental considerations were examined in the development of this Manual and have been determined to be not applicable. 6. FORMS/REPORTS: The forms called for in this Manual are available in USCG Electronic Forms on the Standard Workstation or on the Internet: http://www.uscg.mil/forms/, CG Central at http://cgcentral.uscg.mil/, and Intranet at http://cgweb2.comdt.uscg.mil/CGFORMS/Welcome.htm.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Force Quarterly
    JFQJOINT FORCE QUARTERLY The Security of the Americas Autumn00 A PROFESSIONAL MILITARY JOURNAL ...we must find a better balance between independence and joint- ness. This is bound to be a painful process. Self-sufficiency is a kind of cultural imperative....But we simply cannot afford to configure each service’s combat forces for sustained, independent operations. The key word these days is jointness. And...jointness means depending on one another. —Merrill A. McPeak JFQ AWord fromthe MV–22 Osprey on deck of USS Essex. Chairman U.S. Navy (Jaime D. Hernandez) espite the unparalleled strength of the instances when nations failed to understand that Armed Forces, we should not become successful methods and technologies applied in complacent. Maintaining the status one conflict may be inadequate in the next. Vic- Dquo will not serve national interests. torious powers benefitted from dramatic innova- The evolving security environment of today, re- tions. Such changes, often regarded as a revolu- plete with new challenges and new opportunities, tion in military affairs (RMA), have occurred demands a capable and flexible military. Our throughout history. New technologies and their great strength is service core competencies. We applications can alter the balance of power as the must expand on them to provide seamless inter- champion of a new RMA assumes a position of operability in joint operations—our first joint dominance. Successful warfare in the Middle Ages core competency. was represented by knights in armor. To over- come them, English yeomen introduced the long- Looking Back bow—a revolution in its day—to defeat the close- In developing a transformation strategy, we in superiority of French arms in the 12th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Suicide Facts Oladeinde Is a Staff Writerall for Hands Suicide Is on the Rise Nationwide
    A L p AN Stephen Murphy (left),of Boston, AMSAN Kevin Sitterson (center), of Roper, N.C., and AN Rick Martell,of Bronx, N.Y., await the launch of an F-14 Tomcat on the flight deckof USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71). e 4 24 e 6 e e Hidden secrets Operation Deliberate Force e e The holidays are a time for giving. USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71) e e proves what it is made of during one of e e Make time for your shipmates- it e e could be the gift of life. the biggest military operations in Europe e e since World War 11. e e e e 6 e e 28 e e Grab those Gifts e e Merchants say thanks to those in This duty’s notso tough e e uniform. Your ID card is worth more Nine-section duty is off to a great start e e e e than you may think. and gets rave reviews aboardUSS e e Anchorage (LSD 36). e e PAGE 17 e e 10 e e The right combination 30 e e e e Norfolk hospital corpsman does studio Sailors care,do their fair share e e time at night. Seabees from CBU420 build a Habitat e e e e for Humanity house in Jacksonville, Fla. e e 12 e e e e Rhyme tyme 36 e e Nautical rhymes bring the past to Smart ideas start here e e e e everyday life. See how many you Sailors learn the ropes and get off to a e e remember.
    [Show full text]
  • Ship Covers Relating to the Iran/Iraq Tanker War
    THE IRAN/IRAQ TANKER WAR AND RENAMED TANKERS ~ Lawrence Brennan, (US Navy Ret.) SHIP COVERS RELATING TO THE IRAN/IRAQ TANKER WAR & REFLAGGED KUWAITI TANKERS, 1987-881 “The Kuwaiti fleet reads like a road map of southern New Jersey” By Captain Lawrence B. Brennan, U.S. Navy Retired2 Thirty years ago there was a New Jersey connection to the long-lasting Iran-Iraq War. That eight years of conflict was one of the longest international two-state wars of the 20th century, beginning in September 1980 and effectively concluding in a truce in August 1988. The primary and bloody land war between Iran and Iraq began during the Iranian Hostage Crisis. The Shah had left Iran and that year the USSR invaded Afghanistan. The conflict expanded to sea and involved many neutral nations whose shipping came under attack by the combatants. The parties’ intent was to damage their opponents’ oil exports and revenues and decrease world supplies. Some suggested that Iran and Iraq wanted to draw other states into the conflict. An Iranian source explained the origin of the conflict at sea. The tanker war seemed likely to precipitate a major international incident for two reasons. First, some 70 percent of Japanese, 50 percent of West European, and 7 percent of American oil imports came from the Persian Gulf in the early 1980s. Second, the assault on tankers involved neutral shipping as well as ships of the belligerent states.3 The relatively obscure first phase began in 1981, and the well-publicized second phase began in 1984. New Jersey, half a world away from the Persian (Arabian) gulf, became involved when the United States agreed to escort Kuwait tankers in an effort to support a friendly nation and keep the international waters open.
    [Show full text]
  • Across Oceans, Across Time ® … Stories from the Family History & Genealogy Center …
    Across Oceans, Across Time ® … Stories from the Family History & Genealogy Center … It’s not uncommon for a business firm, a building, or even a street to bear an individual’s name. It is, however, somewhat less usual to lend one’s name to a battleship. In Annapolis, Maryland, the one runs across the name Klakring without necessarily realizing that the references are to the descendants of Danish immigrants. Carl Theodor Klakring was born in Copenhagen in 1821, the oldest son of a small shopkeeper, Niels Madsen Klakring, and his wife, Dorthea. Carl trained as a copperplate engraver and by 1850 he was working in his profession, had married, and fathered a son named Olaf. The family lived in Holmen parish, one of the Copenhagen neighborhoods close to the Danish naval shipyards. Sometime in the 1850s Carl’s wife apparently died; he fostered out his son and came to the Washington, DC, where he married a young German immigrant woman in 1860, changed his name to Charles, and had a second family. He continued to live and work as an engraver in the nation’s capital until his death in the late 1890s. In 1869 Olaf Klakring, now 20 years old and a trained cooper, became the 2nd generation of the family to come to the U.S. He gravitated to Annapolis, married an American girl, and raised a large family while working as a barber there for several decades. Olaf’s 2nd son, Leslie, born in 1883, was a lifelong resident of Annapolis and employed for many years at the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • US Navy Program Guide 2012
    U.S. NAVY PROGRAM GUIDE 2012 U.S. NAVY PROGRAM GUIDE 2012 FOREWORD The U.S. Navy is the world’s preeminent cal change continues in the Arab world. Nations like Iran maritime force. Our fleet operates forward every day, and North Korea continue to pursue nuclear capabilities, providing America offshore options to deter conflict and while rising powers are rapidly modernizing their militar- advance our national interests in an era of uncertainty. ies and investing in capabilities to deny freedom of action As it has for more than 200 years, our Navy remains ready on the sea, in the air and in cyberspace. To ensure we are for today’s challenges. Our fleet continues to deliver cred- prepared to meet our missions, I will continue to focus on ible capability for deterrence, sea control, and power pro- my three main priorities: 1) Remain ready to meet current jection to prevent and contain conflict and to fight and challenges, today; 2) Build a relevant and capable future win our nation’s wars. We protect the interconnected sys- force; and 3) Enable and support our Sailors, Navy Civil- tems of trade, information, and security that enable our ians, and their Families. Most importantly, we will ensure nation’s economic prosperity while ensuring operational we do not create a “hollow force” unable to do the mission access for the Joint force to the maritime domain and the due to shortfalls in maintenance, personnel, or training. littorals. These are fiscally challenging times. We will pursue these Our Navy is integral to combat, counter-terrorism, and priorities effectively and efficiently, innovating to maxi- crisis response.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H3513
    July 20, 2020 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H3513 has, for years, ‘‘used the Open Skies I would love for the time when there AMENDMENT NO. 168 OFFERED BY MR. HASTINGS Treaty to collect intelligence on civil- were discussions of amendments on the OF FLORIDA ian infrastructure and other sensitive other side to shackle our nuclear weap- At the end of subtitle B of title III, insert sites in America.’’ ons programs to instead point out that the following: The Kremlin has been abusing this China is launching more ballistic mis- SEC. 3ll. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING AN INTEGRATED MASTER PLAN TO- treaty to gather intelligence on the siles for testing and training than the WARDS ACHIEVING NET ZERO. United States. The President was abso- entire rest of the world combined. It is the sense of Congress that the Depart- lutely right to withdraw, and my col- I would have loved for the speakers ment of Defense should develop an inte- leagues on the other side of the aisle on the other side of the aisle to march grated master plan for pursuing Net Zero ini- need to be consistent. If they say that down to the microphone and tell this tiatives and reductions in fossil fuels using they stand on principle, then they need country about Skyfall, the new weapon the findings of— (1) the assessment of Department of De- to be consistent about that principle ICBM that Russia is putting together that is nuclear powered that can orbit fense operational energy usage required and not simply oppose things because under section 318; Trump supports them.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOGRAPHICAL DATA BOO KK Pinnacle Class 2021-1 12-16 April
    BBIIOOGGRRAAPPHHIICCAALL DDAATTAA BBOOOOKK Pinnacle Class 2021-1 12-16 April 2021 Pinnacle Fellows Biographies U N I T E D S T A T E S A I R F O R C E LIEUTENANT GENERAL SAM C. BARRETT Lt. Gen. Sam C. Barrett is the Director for Logistics, Joint Staff, the Pentagon, Arlington, Virginia. As the Director for Logistics, he integrates logistics planning and execution in support of global operations and assists the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in fulfilling his responsibilities as the principal military advisor to the President and Secretary of Defense. Lt. Gen. Barrett received his commission after graduating from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1988 with a Bachelor of Science in General Studies. A command pilot with more than 4,400 hours in the C-141B, T-1A, KC-135R/T, C-40B, C-21, and C-17A, he has commanded at the squadron, wing and numbered Air Force levels. He also served as the Director of Operations, Strategic Deterrence, and Nuclear Integration at Headquarters Air Mobility Command, and the Director of the U.S. Central Command Deployment and Distribution Operations Center (CDDOC). Prior to his current assignment, Lt. Gen. Barrett was the Commander, Eighteenth Air Force, Scott Air Force Base, Illinois. Lt. Gen. Barrett is a distinguished graduate with a Master of Operational Art and Science from the Air Command and Staff College, an outstanding graduate of the Air War College, and a distinguished graduate with a Master of National Security and Strategic Studies from the Naval War College. EDUCATION 1988 Bachelor of Science, General Studies, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • USS Elrod Encounters Suspected Drug Smugglers in Mediterranean
    ® Serving the Hampton Roads Navy Family Vol. 18, No. 22, Norfolk, VA FLAGSHIPNEWS.COM June 3, 2010 Gates addresses troops on A seven man visit, board, search and seizure team ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ repeal from USS Elrod (FFG 55) conducts a consensual BY JIM been in effect since 1994. boarding on a ridged hull GARAMONE “Key to successful repeal will infl atable boat to verify American the vessel’s registration be the ongoing Defense Depart- Forces Press ment review, and as such, I am and country of origin, May Service 25. Elrod encountered grateful that the amendments the three suspected WASH- … will ensure that the Depart- drug smugglers off the INGTON ment of Defense can complete coast of Morocco in — Defense that comprehensive review international waters in the Secretary that will allow our military and Western Mediterranean Defense Secretary Robert M. Robert M. Gates their families the opportunity Sea while conducting Gates told to inform and shape the imple- routine operations in the U.S. Sixth Fleet area of troops worldwide, May 28, that mentation process,” he said in a operations. any repeal of the so-called “Don’t written statement released by the Ask, Don’t Tell” law will be de- White House May 27. U.S. Navy photo layed until the ongoing Defense Obama said being the com- Department high-level review is mander in chief is his greatest USS Elrod encounters suspected completed and only after he, the honor. “This legislation will help president and the chairman of the make our armed forces even Joint Chiefs of Staff all can certi- stronger and more inclusive by drug smugglers in Mediterranean fy that the department is ready to allowing gay and lesbian soldiers PRESS RELEASE make the change without hurting to serve honestly and with integ- Commander, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOGRAPHICAL DATA BOO KK Class 2019-2 10-21 June 2019 National Defense University
    BBIIOOGGRRAAPPHHIICCAALL DDAATTAA BBOOOOKK Class 2019-2 10-21 June 2019 National Defense University NDU PRESIDENT NDU VICE PRESIDENT Vice Admiral Fritz Roegge, USN 16th President Vice Admiral Fritz Roegge is an honors graduate of the University of Minnesota with a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering and was commissioned through the Reserve Officers' Training Corps program. He earned a Master of Science in Engineering Management from the Catholic University of America and a Master of Arts with highest distinction in National Security and Strategic Studies from the Naval War College. He was a fellow of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Seminar XXI program. VADM Fritz Roegge, NDU President (Photo His sea tours include USS Whale (SSN 638), USS by NDU AV) Florida (SSBN 728) (Blue), USS Key West (SSN 722) and command of USS Connecticut (SSN 22). His major command tour was as commodore of Submarine Squadron 22 with additional duty as commanding officer, Naval Support Activity La Maddalena, Italy. Ashore, he has served on the staffs of both the Atlantic and the Pacific Submarine Force commanders, on the staff of the director of Naval Nuclear Propulsion, on the Navy staff in the Assessments Division (N81) and the Military Personnel Plans and Policy Division (N13), in the Secretary of the Navy's Office of Legislative Affairs at the U. S, House of Representatives, as the head of the Submarine and Nuclear Power Distribution Division (PERS 42) at the Navy Personnel Command, and as an assistant deputy director on the Joint Staff in both the Strategy and Policy (J5) and the Regional Operations (J33) Directorates.
    [Show full text]
  • Churchill Crosses Suez Canal Into 5 Fleet
    USS Winston S. Churchill (DDG 81) Public Affairs Release Churchill Crosses Suez Canal into 5 th Fleet By Mass Communication Specialist 2 nd Class Aaron Chase, USS Winston S. Churchill Public Affairs RED SEA [July 18, 2012] –The guided-missile destroyer USS Winston S. Churchill (DDG 81) passed through the Suez Canal and into the U.S. Navy 5 th Fleet area of operations (AOR) July 18 th . Churchill, a member of the Eisenhower Carrier Strike Group (CSG), trailed the guided-missile cruiser USS Hue City (CG 66) and the nuclear-powered carrier Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69), along with the guided-missile frigate USS Klakring (FFG 42), the dry cargo/ammunition ship USNS Robert E. Peary and the fleet replenishment oiler USNS Big Horn (T-AO 198) though the 167-kilometer canal The destroyer’s position at the rear of the convoy of ships allows it to better defend against threats if they arise, according to Cmdr. Christine R. O’Connell, executive officer of Churchill. The small arms and air support capa- bilities of the destroyer make it more capable of responding quickly to threats in the narrower confines of the canal, said O’Connoll, so response time is important. “An approaching ship might be innocent in its intentions, but in case it’s not, we must be able to respond immedi- ately,” said O’Connoll. The canal is one of the world’s busiest and most congested areas for sea traffic, so security is a little more height- ened than at a normal straits transit, according to Churchill’s Weapons Officer, Lt.
    [Show full text]