2021 VCC Virginia Crime Codes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2021 VCC Virginia Crime Codes 2021 VCC Virginia Crime Codes Listed Alphabetically and by Statute Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission u Virginia Crime Codes (VCC) Instructions Guideline Offenses If an offense is covered by the sentencing guidelines, the The Virginia Crime Codes (VCCs) presented herein represent VCC and statute for that offense are in bold. Users are an offense identification system based on the Code of Virgin- reminded to refer to the offense listing at the beginning ia. Codes have been developed and assigned to most crimes of each chapter and the rules in the front of the Guide- defined in the Code of Virginia. These codes are used when lines Manual to determine the appropriate worksheet to deciding which sentencing guidelines worksheet to complete and be completed. for determining statutory seriousness levels. Mandatory Minimums Code Characteristics If the penalty for an offense includes a mandatory min- The VCCs are comprised of a combination of nine letters and imum that a judge must impose and cannot suspend, numbers (e.g., BUR-2211-F3). The first three letters of each the amount of time is printed in the mandatory minimum VCC represent an abbreviation of the broad offense title under column (abbreviated “MM”). which the crime falls. Thus, the prefix “BUR” is used for all bur- glary offenses, “ARS” for all arson offenses, “ASL” for all assault Selecting the Proper VCC offenses, and so forth. The next four digits are an identification A VCC is assigned to each separate offense in a sen- code unique to each crime. The last two positions of the VCC tencing event. In many instances, there is one VCC per represent the seriousness index based on the statutory maxi- section in the Code of Virginia. For example, mum penalty for the crime. MUR-0944-F5 is the only VCC for voluntary manslaugh- ter (§18.2-35). The Seriousness Index The first digit of the seriousness index (digit 8 of the VCC) is a In other instances, the Code of Virginia specifies differ- letter which takes on the following meanings: ent penalty structures depending on the elements of the offense. For example, §18.2-89 specifies a penalty of F = Felony Offense 5 to 20 years for common law burglary. However, if a M = Misdemeanor Offense deadly weapon was used and the offender is charged A = Attempt (Felonies Only) with using a deadly weapon, the penalty range becomes C = Conspiracy (Felonies Only) 20 years to life. In this case, the VCC BUR-2221-F3 is S = Special Penalty Structure applied to the “burglary of a dwelling at night with the in- L = Life Without Parole (§ 19.2-297.1) tent to commit larceny/felony - without a deadly weapon” X = Subsequent Violent Sexual Assault and the code BUR-2222-F2 is applied to the “burglary of (§18.2-67.5:3 and § 18.2-67.5:2) a dwelling at night with the intent to commit larceny/felo- O = Local Ordinance ny - with a deadly weapon.” J = Adult sentenced for Juvenile offense (§ 16.1-284) Y = Commitment of serious juvenile offender (§ 16.1-285.1) In other instances, such as the offense group of robbery, T = Solicitation to commit a felony (§ 18.2-29) the Code of Virginia specifies one penalty range. How- V = Solicitation to commit a felony-adult solicits juvenile (§ 18.2-29) ever, one of several VCCs can be applied to this offense. For example, ROB-1214-F9 is the proper VCC for an The second position of the offense seriousness index unarmed robbery on a street. In these instances, par- (position 9 of VCC) is described below. ticular attention should be given to the facts of the case to ensure proper selection of the VCC. Proper selection Thus, when the letter “F” is paired with the number “2” (F2) the of the VCC will help ensure that the correct number of interpretation is that the offense is a class two felony with a points are assigned on the sentencing guidelines work- statutory maximum penalty of life; “M3” would represent a class sheets. three misdemeanor with a maximum penalty of a fine only. Virginia Crime Codes i Virginia Crime Codes (VCC) Attempts and Conspiracies § 18.2-67.5 defines the penalties for attempted rape, The letters "A" (Attempt) and "C" (Conspiracy) are penalty forcible sodomy, object sexual penetration, aggravated modifiers and can be used in place of the "F" (Felony) sexual battery, and sexual battery. The penalties included in designation when appropriate. There are no specific VCCs the tables printed on page v are applicable for these crimes for Code of Virginia § 18.2-22 (Conspiracy) and except for attempted aggravated sexual battery. Instead of a §§ 18.2-25, 18.2-26, and 18.2-27 (Attempts). Rather than 10-year statutory maximum, the statutory maximum is 5 utilize a code referring to the generic conspiracy or attempt years for an attempted aggravated sexual battery. statutes, the VCC designates an attempt or conspiracy by utilizing the proper VCC for the offense if it were a completed Attempts and conspiracies to commit misdemeanors do act and replacing the "F" with an "A" or a "C." For example, not result in any change in statutory penalty structure. For the offense "malicious bodily injury to a law enforcement example, an attempt or conspiracy to commit a simple officer" has a VCC of ASL-1326-F9, which would change to assault would be reflected in a VCC of ASL-1313-M1, which ASL-1326-A9 for an attempt or ASL-1326-C9 for a conspiracy is also the same code used to indicate the actual commis- to commit this specific crime. Please note that these penalty sion of this misdemeanor crime. Thus, attempts and modifiers only apply to felony offenses. conspiracies to commit a misdemeanor retain the use of the letter "M" in the eighth position of the VCC. There are penalty modifiers for the following statutes relating to attempts and conspiracies: §§ 18.2-22, 18.2-25, 18.2-26, Special Penalty Structures 18.2-27, 18.2-256 or 18.2-257(a). Refer to the tables printed The "S" designation in the eighth position of the VCC on page v for the appropriate statutory maximum. For other indicates that the crime carries a special penalty structure statutes that use the words attempt or conspire, such as that does not fall within the fixed parameters of class 1 conspiring with others to incite a riot (§ 18.2-408) or at- through 6 felonies or class 1 through 4 misdemeanors. tempted escape (§ 18.2-480), there are no penalty modifiers. The number "9" placed in the ninth position of the VCC is The "F" in the VCC remains the same and in most cases, the often paired with an "S" designation since it too refers to a penalties for these crimes remain the same as completed special penalty structure. Occasionally , an offense code acts. will contain a seriousness index (VCC positions 8, 9) value of "F9" or "M9." "F9" indicates the crime is a designated felony with a special penalty structure, while "M9" desig- nates a misdemeanor crime with a special penalty struc- ture. ii Virginia Crime Codes Virginia Crime Codes (VCC) Category I and II Crimes "Three Strikes" Violent felony crimes, as established by § 17.1-805 of the The letter "L" is also a penalty modifier and should be used Code of Virginia, are identified in the penalty column of the in place of the "F" when a defendant is convicted under § VCC list. A designation of (I) indicates a "Category I" 19.2-297.1. For example, the offense "carjacking" has a offense with a maximum penalty of forty years or more. VCC of ROB-1225-F9, which would change to ROB-1225-L9 "Category II" offenses with a maximum penalty of less for a conviction under the "three strikes” statute. than forty years are identified by (II). See the general instructions of the Sentencing Guidelines Manual for a Traffic Infractions and Criminal Traffic Codes more detailed description of Category I and II crimes. Traffic infractions are not included in the VCC list. However, criminal traffic codes are listed in the alphabetical Solicitation and statutory listings. A list of traffic infraction VCCs can be Solicitation to commit murder has the VCC of SOL-7202- found at www.vcsc.virginia.gov or mobile.vcsc.virginia.gov. F9. All other felonies require that for any of fense under § 18.2-29, the preparer replace the "F" with a "T" if an adult solicits an adult or the "F" with a "V" if an adult solicits a juvenile to commit a felony. When the "T" replaces the "F" in the VCC, score the of fense as a Class 6 felony. When the "V" replaces the "F" in the VCC, score the offense as a Class 5 felony. Subsequent Sexual Assault Offenses The letter "X" is used as a penalty modifier when a defendant is convicted under § 18.2-67.5:3 or § 18.2- 67.5:2. The "F" in the VCC is replaced with a "X" when a defendant is convicted of a subsequent sexual assault and imposition of the st atutory maximum is mandatory . Virginia Crime Codes iii Virginia Crime Codes (VCC) Establishing VCC Codes § 19.2-390.01. Use of Virginia crime code references If you are unable to find a VCC that corresponds to a required. Virginia conviction, please contact the Virginia Criminal If any criminal warrant, indictment, information, presentment, Sentencing Commission. Staff of the Commission will petition, summons, charging document issued by a establish a code for the crime as needed.
Recommended publications
  • OJ Simpson Murder Trial DVD Cataloging Still in Progress
    OJ SIMPSON MURDER TRIAL O.J. Simpson "Bronco Chase" audio CD (full transcript can be seen here) OJ Simpson Murder Trial DVD Collection (each disc is roughly 4 hours) Two hundred 4 hr. DVD's, professionally edited (100% commercial free) - contains virtually every minute of testimony. Recorded from local L.A. television stations, live as the events unfolded. Coverage begins with reports of the murders, till weeks after the verdict - and beyond. "O.J. Simpson - The Whole Story (and then some)" legend: "break" = fade to black, edited commercial break "H/C" = Hard Copy "ET" = Entertainment Tonight * To purchase, or inquire about OJ SImpson Murder Trial DVD duplications, click here * * To download a .pdf file of this OJ SImpson Murder Trial DVD listing, click here (322 KB) * OJ TRIAL #001 DVD (3:53:00) * News reports of the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman (ABC News, FX) * OJ waiting in truck outside of his house (@ 0:01:10) * Taped earlier: end of freeway chase, to Parker Center, news reports (@ 0:50:00) * Gil Garcetti, Commander Gascon: recap of charges (@ 1:36:48) * OJ's mug shot released on 11 o'clock news (@ 2:23:00), recap of days events * Johnnie Cochran, Al Michaels on "NightLine" (@ 2:51:00) * KNBC Morning News recap of events (@ 2:58:00) * Criminal Courts Bldg. Pre-Trial Preliminary Hearing, KNBC - Judge Kathleen Kennedy-Powell (@ 3:02:00) * Michele Kestler - LAPD Crime Lab (@ 3:18:00), cross-examination (@ 3:49:00), recess (@ 3:52:00) * KNBC news-break. OJ TRIAL #002 DVD (3:58:45) * Live evidence search KNBC news * Michele Kestler cross-examination cont.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Age Samaritans
    Boston College Law Review Volume 62 Issue 4 Article 3 4-29-2021 Digital Age Samaritans Zachary D. Kaufman University of Houston Law Center, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Internet Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Zachary D. Kaufman, Digital Age Samaritans, 62 B.C. L. Rev. 1117 (2021), https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol62/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DIGITAL AGE SAMARITANS ZACHARY D. KAUFMAN INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1119 I. OBSERVATION OF CRIME IN THE DIGITAL AGE ...................................................................... 1129 A. Opportunities ................................................................................................................... 1129 B. Challenges ....................................................................................................................... 1133 II. THE GATES-LONINA CASE .................................................................................................... 1139 III. GOOD AND BAD SAMARITANS IN THE DIGITAL AGE ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AM BRIT OCTOBER 2015 Changes.Indd
    Periodical POSTAGE PAID Marshfield, MO OCTOBER 2015 • Volume LXVII • Number 10 Number • LXVII Volume • 2015 OCTOBER The American Brittany American The B:8.75 in T:8.5 in S:7.5 in B:8.75 in T:8.5 in S:7.5 in FOCUSED DISCOVER A BREAKTHROUGH B:11.25 in NUTRITION S:10 in TO FOCUS INNOVATION FOR DOGS 7 AND in T:11 OLDER IN THE FIELD. PURINA DISCOVERED enhanced botanical oils can be In the fi eld or in competition, your Bri� any needs used as an additional THEspecialized INSIGHT nutrition to complementenergy his specializedsource for the brain THE RESULTS aroundgenetics age and7, a dog’s training. in dogs age 7+. when added to the daily diet glucoseThat’s metabolism why every in the dry formula we make at of dogs seven and older: brain begins to change, our Purina-owned U.S. plants is cra� ed which can aff ect memory, B:11.25 in T:11 in T:11 to help him be the best he can be. PROMOTED S:10 in learning, awareness or • Memory • A� ention decision-making. • Trainability DIFFERENCES YOU MAY purinaproclub.com SEE IN YOUR DOG: • Interaction with you Purina trademarks are owned by Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. Printed in the USA. • Interest in playing • Ability to adapt and cope with change CheckMark Communications American Bri� any Discover more at June 2015 BRIGHTMINDEFFECT.COM Ad Code: NPPL14BDBRNA2-REV 726644 Ad Size: 8-1/2”W x 11”D + Bleeds Available exclusively at Pet Specialty Retailers Purina trademarks are owned by Société des Produits Nestlé S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Recipe for Paranoia
    TELE VISION "they"? In the manner of Perry Mason, Greene sets out to find out—and therein lies the show's cheapest shot. Conspir- acy buffs have relentlessly tried to pin JFK's murder on both pro- and anti- Castro Cubans, the FBI, the CIA and even the Mafia. As Greene pursues leads to each of these links, the film keeps switching to dramatized flashback scenes in which Oswald is shown secret- ly meeting with a variety of sinister- looking figures. Obviously, someone is trying to recruit him for something. Back in the present, Oswald's defense team reads conspiracy into the most neb- ulous of clues. One of their potential witnesses is Found dead after being stabbed with an ice pick. "That sounds like the Mob," concludes Greene's assis- tant. A second witness expires in an automobile crash. -Another accident?" ABC photos bellows Greene. The assistant then re- ABC's 'Trial of Lee Harvey Oswald': Revisionism and showbiz turns with an elaborate theory involving a CIA-Mafia connection motivated by the haziest of mutual interests. By the time Oswald himself takes the stand to Recipe for Paranoia deny his guilt, the audience has been y many other names, what is today From inconsistencies in the Warren conditioned to select a conspiracy to fit B called a "docu-drama" has been Commission Report, plus all manner of almost any prejudice. around ever since William Shakespeare subsequent speculations, ABC has fash- A Fatal Covenant: Indeed, virtually ev- did his semi-fictional number on Julius ioned what amounts to a brief for the ery ingredient in this production seems Caesar.
    [Show full text]
  • English Legal System
    ELEVENTH EDITION English Legal System ‘The book has several strengths welcome to students and lecturers alike: up to date, well-written and comprehensive. It provides clear exposition of the central themes whilst the delightful layout makes the information readily accessible.’ Dr. Jackson Maogoto, Senior Lecturer, University of Manchester English Legal System is the best-selling undergraduate text on this subject, providing an authoritative and engaging account of the structure and mechanisms of the law in England and Wales. The authors skilfully present a thought- provoking analysis of the subject, making this the defi nitive introduction to the area and the fi rst choice for students year after year. Annually revised and fully updated, Elliott and Quinn’s English Legal System continues to keep you fully informed of progress and changes premium within this constantly evolving topic. Some key recent developments covered in this eleventh edition include: • The establishment of the Supreme Court • Planned reforms in the Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill Do you want to give yourself a head start come • Changes to the regulation of the legal profession, including the exam time? establishment of the Legal Services Board Visit www.mylawchamber.co.uk/ElliottELS • The opening of family courts to the media to access the accompanying Pearson eText, an • Police tactics following the G20 demonstrations electronic version of English Legal System. The eText is fully linked to interactive quizzes, This eleventh edition offers: sample exam questions with answer guidance, • Comprehensive exposition of the legal system of England and Wales and fl ashcards – all designed so that you can test yourself on topics covered in this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Considering Collusion: a Primer on Potential Crimes
    CONSIDERING COLLUSION: A PRIMER ON POTENTIAL CRIMES OCTOBER 31, 2018 BARRY H. BERKE, DANI R. JAMES, NOAH BOOKBINDER, AND NORMAN L. EISEN* In brief Although “collusion” is not the name of a codified crime,1 the term has come to be shorthand for the possibility that the Trump campaign, its advisors or the president himself coordinated with Russia to help Trump win the 2016 presidential election. Indeed, Special Counsel Robert Mueller has been authorized to investigate “any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump” and to prosecute federal crimes arising from that investigation.2 The president and his proxies have frequently advanced the claim that such coordination, even if it occurred, would not be unlawful. Their refrain that “collusion is not a crime” is in one sense correct. Collusion is not a single crime. It is instead a rubric that encompasses many possible offenses. We detail some of the principal ones in this report. All turn on the possibility that Trump or his associates took action in connection with Russia’s attempts to impact the outcome of our country’s presidential election. The criminal nature of the Russian effort is already well-known. The special counsel’s 191 charges brought against 35 individuals and companies spell out some of the crimes allegedly committed in furtherance of the Russian attack on our democracy. Those include indictments of Russian individuals and entities for their participation in conspiracies to hack into the computer and email systems of 1 The president himself has invoked the term to suggest various wrongdoing by opponents.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Organised Peace Work
    Goliath v David: A Short History of the Fight Against Organised Peace Work “Hermann Göring described, during an interview at the Nuremberg Trials, how denouncing and outlawing pacifism was an important part of the Nazis' seizure of power: "The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the paci- fists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country." “The United States was founded with a militia tradition of citizen-sol- diers.”1 “As the Seven Years’ War stretched into 1758, an “unknown Gentleman” in Pennsylvania censured surrounding Quaker communities for failing to raise pro- vincial “Troops in … a Time [of] inevitable destruction.” Arguing that pacifist policies proved dangerous in times of war, the author claimed that if natives at- tacked the undefended colony Quakers would “be[come] accessary [sic] to the Murders of their Wives and Children.”2 “The basic authority of a modern state over its people resides in its war powers... On a day-to-day basis, it is represented by the institution of police, armed organiz- ations charged expressly with dealing with "internal enemies" in a military man- ner. Like the conventional "external" military, the police are also substantially ex- empt from many civilian legal restraints on their social behaviour. In some coun- tries, the artificial distinction between police and other military forces does not ex- ist. On the long-term basis, a government's emergency war powers - inherent in the structure of even the most libertarian of nations - define the most significant aspect of the relation between state and citizen.”3 “In addition, peace movements worldwide have to face charges of being un- patriotic, of undermining the troops, even of assisting the enemy”.
    [Show full text]
  • Secrecy Laws Would Treat Media As Spies
    NEWS FROM THE NATIONAL EXECUTIVE Informedissue 36 July 2021 requiring official ID and strip the Electoral Commission of powers to initiate criminal prosecutions of election wrongdoing, made their way through the Houses of Parliament. Under the Police, Crime, Courts and Sentencing Bill protestors could face criminal charges if otherwise peaceful demonstrations are deemed to cause “nuisance” or are “noisy” or even have an “impact” on others in the area. This Bill also gives a range of authorities the ability to extract information from electronic devices to seek evidence in prosecuting certain crimes; it’s unclear if this will affect journalists. The NUJ’s Ethics Council has voiced deep concerns about the Nationality and Secrecy laws would Borders Bill which introduces a two-tier asylum system and the criminalisation treat media as spies of anyone who arrives in the UK without permission. The Law Society says it would A raft of legislation and government treat journalists as if they are spies.” be in contravention of the 1951 Refugee plans present an unparalleled The two Duncan Campbells – the Convention. Most commentators agree assault on journalism, democracy former Guardian correspondent; and it is a nasty piece of legislation which will and human rights which would the investigative journalist specialising endanger some of the most vulnerable give an increasingly authoritarian in civil liberties who was a defendant in people in the world fleeing war and government draconian powers. the 1978 ABC trial on charges of leaking persecution. The Bill also paves the way If they become law, it would mean government information – reprised their for potential offshore processing centres that – just by doing their job – journalists double act of the July meeting of the for refugees.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethical and Legal Considerations for Attorneys Conducting Investigations
    Hofstra Law Review Volume 36 | Issue 2 Article 10 2007 Fighting Fire with Fire: Private Attorneys Using the Same Investigative Techniques as Government Attorneys: The thicE al and Legal Considerations for Attorneys Conducting Investigations Gerald B. Lefcourt Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Lefcourt, Gerald B. (2007) "Fighting Fire with Fire: Private Attorneys Using the Same Investigative Techniques as Government Attorneys: The thicalE and Legal Considerations for Attorneys Conducting Investigations," Hofstra Law Review: Vol. 36: Iss. 2, Article 10. Available at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr/vol36/iss2/10 This document is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Lefcourt: Fighting Fire with Fire: Private Attorneys Using the Same Investi FIGHTING FIRE WITH FIRE: PRIVATE ATTORNEYS USING THE SAME INVESTIGATIVE TECHNIQUES AS GOVERNMENT ATTORNEYS: THE ETHICAL AND LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR ATTORNEYS CONDUCTING INVESTIGATIONS GeraldB. Lefcourt* I. INTRODUCTION As any litigator knows, cases are won or lost on the facts. Effective factual development and investigation are crucial to the success of any case. But lawyers are often faced with legal and ethical dilemmas concerning the investigative techniques they and their investigators want to use. This is particularly true in criminal cases, where discovery is extremely limited. One of the thorniest issues is the use of deception and other surreptitious techniques to gather information.
    [Show full text]
  • CHJPTER SEVEN Reconstructing Socialist Criminology 7.1 the Riots
    - 533 - CHJPTER SEVEN Reconstructing Socialist Criminology 7.1 The Riots of 1981 The most serious problem to confront the Thatcher Government in the first 2½ years of its project of social and economic construction emerged, in the event, from the underclass rather than from the organised Labour Movement. The serious but localised riots of 1980 in Brixton and Bristol - which had been authoritatively explained as resulting from conditions peculiar to particular neighbourhoods - were followed in July 1981 by a series of major disturbances in Southall, Toxteth, Brixton (on several separate occasions), Moss Side, and elsewhere. Massive amounts of property damage and looting occurred and large numbers of police and the public were injured. On 13 July, the Nerseyside Police became the first force in mainland Britain to make use of rubber bullets and CS gas on civilians, and, in the same week, the Government announced that army camps would be used to house those who received prison sentences as a result of the riots. The Government also announced its intention to investigate the possibility of legislating for a new Riot Act and generally proclaimed its support for more aggressive police responses in any future situation where there was "a threat to public order". In July and in August, further outbreaks of street violence occurred sporadically in Liverpool and in other British cities. These were authoritatively explained as "copycat riots", requiring the firm and deterrent response from the authorities. On 29 July, in Liverpool, 22 year old David Moore, crippled in one leg, died after being pinned against a wall by a Police Land-rover, after Merseyside Police had adopted the method of clearing crowds used by the RUC in Belfast (of driving vans at and through the people on the street) .
    [Show full text]
  • Goliath Vs David: a Short History of the Fight Against Organised Peace Work
    Goliath vs David: A Short History of the Fight Against Organised Peace Work “Hermann Göring described, during an interview at the Nuremberg Trials, how denouncing and outlawing pacifism was an important part of the Nazis' seizure of power: "The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the paci- fists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country." “The United States was founded with a militia tradition of citizen-soldiers.”1 “As the Seven Years’ War stretched into 1758, an “unknown Gentleman” in Pennsylvania censured surrounding Quaker communities for failing to raise pro- vincial “Troops in … a Time [of] inevitable destruction.” Arguing that pacifist policies proved dangerous in times of war, the author claimed that if natives at- tacked the undefended colony Quakers would “be[come] accessary [sic] to the Murders of their Wives and Children.”2 “The basic authority of a modern state over its people resides in its war powers... On a day-to-day basis, it is represented by the institution of police, armed organiz- ations charged expressly with dealing with "internal enemies" in a military man- ner. Like the conventional "external" military, the police are also substantially ex- empt from many civilian legal restraints on their social behaviour. In some coun- tries, the artificial distinction between police and other military forces does not ex- ist. On the long-term basis, a government's emergency war powers - inherent in the structure of even the most libertarian of nations - define the most significant aspect of the relation between state and citizen.”3 “In addition, peace movements worldwide have to face charges of being un- patriotic, of undermining the troops, even of assisting the enemy”.
    [Show full text]
  • Enigma 2000 Newsletter
    ENIGMA 2000 NEWSLETTER http://enigma2000group.org © P.Beaumont 10thJuly, 2018 RAF E3-D Sentry Photographed during the flypast of Buckingham Palace of 100 aircraft 1200z 10/07/2018 ISSUE 108 September 2018 http://www.enigma2000.org.uk © All items within this newsletter remain the property of ENIGMA 2000 and are copyright. See last page1 also. Editorial Apart from the variable signal strengths and continuing QRM and QRN [and sometimes accompanying QSB] frequency changes to the August E07 Sun/Wed 1700z and Mon/Wed 1900z schedules have been noted, but read on. Thanks for spotting the Sunday change Ary and thanks to Malc for Monday’s. Sun/Wed as: 1700z 13397kHz ; 1720z 12197kHz ; 1740z 10697kHz Mon/Wed as: 1900z 16147kHz; 1920z 14647kHz; 1940z 13447kHz The variable propagation changed for the worse abound the weekend 25th August as things became bad; not a lot above 10500kHz in the mornings and not helped by the noise from broadband on twisted pairs in the UK and other places. A daily check of my phone app illustrates 30 to 10m are generally poor. Several interesting developments in the world of the number station have been observed over the past couple of months; perhaps the most unusual occurrence is that the Sunday + Wednesday E07 schedule, 1700 UTC start, has made a change of operating mode from old fashioned amplitude modulation with a carrier and both side-bands to SSB, noticed on the very first day of July. There has often been a problem with E07 AM schedules in the past with very low levels of audio resulting in difficult to impossible copy, although this had been much improved in the weeks before the move to SSB.
    [Show full text]