A Scoping Study for Potential Community-Based Carbon Offsetting Schemes in the Falkland Islands

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Scoping Study for Potential Community-Based Carbon Offsetting Schemes in the Falkland Islands A SCOPING STUDY FOR POTENTIAL COMMUNITY-BASED CARBON OFFSETTING SCHEMES IN THE FALKLAND ISLANDS Chris Evans, Jonathan Ritson, Jim McAdam, Stefanie Carter, Andrew Stanworth and Katherine Ross Date: August 2020 Undertaken by Funded by Recommended citation: Evans, C. et al (2020). A scoping study for potential community‐based carbon offsetting schemes in the Falkland Islands. Report to Falklands Conservation, Stanley. Author affiliations: Chris Evans (UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology) Jonathan Ritson (University of Manchester), Jim McAdam (Queen’s University Belfast and Falkland Islands Trust), Stefanie Carter (South Atlantic Environmental Research Institute), Andrew Stanworth (Falklands Conservation) and Katherine Ross (Falklands Conservation). Falklands Conservation: Jubilee Villas, 41 Ross Road, Stanley, Falkland Islands Corresponding author: [email protected] www.falklandsconservation.com Charity Information: Falklands Conservation: Registered Charity No. 1073859. A company limited by guarantee in England & Wales No. 3661322 Registered Office: 2nd Floor, Regis House, 45 King William Street, London, EC4R 9AN Telephone: +44 (0) 1767 693710, [email protected] Registered as an Overseas Company in the Falkland Islands ii Contents A SCOPING STUDY FOR POTENTIAL COMMUNITY‐BASED CARBON OFFSETTING SCHEMES IN THE FALKLAND ISLANDS .................................................................................................................................. i Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Peatlands and the carbon cycle .......................................................................................................... 3 The extent and characteristics of Falkland peatlands ........................................................................ 4 The history and current nature of land‐use impacts on Falkland peatlands ...................................... 5 Overview of international carbon markets and offsetting schemes .................................................. 9 Quantifying carbon offset potential ..................................................................................................... 10 Current state of knowledge on greenhouse gas emissions and removals by Falkland peatlands ... 10 Opportunities and mechanisms for Falkland peat restoration ......................................................... 18 Tussac restoration ......................................................................................................................... 18 Grazing land management ............................................................................................................ 19 Erosion control .............................................................................................................................. 21 Re‐wetting ..................................................................................................................................... 22 Other management options ......................................................................................................... 23 Quantifying total emissions reduction and offset potential ............................................................. 24 Offset potential from peat emissions reductions and removals .................................................. 24 Offset potential from increased above‐ground biomass .............................................................. 27 Potential scale of a Falkland offset scheme .................................................................................. 29 Data gaps and research needs to support an offsetting scheme ..................................................... 29 Carbon markets and carbon offsetting ................................................................................................. 31 International carbon markets ........................................................................................................... 31 Potential markets and carbon prices ................................................................................................ 32 Market versus government schemes ................................................................................................ 33 Carbon accreditation standards and local offsetting schemes ......................................................... 33 Offsets: reductions versus removals ................................................................................................. 34 Additionality, permanence and leakage ........................................................................................... 34 Monitoring and verification .............................................................................................................. 35 Potential role for a project developer .............................................................................................. 35 Towards a Falkland carbon offsetting scheme ..................................................................................... 36 Outline model for a Falkland Carbon Code ....................................................................................... 36 Challenges and potential solutions ................................................................................................... 36 Co‐benefits and trade‐offs ................................................................................................................ 37 Scheme governance .......................................................................................................................... 38 iii Future requirements to support scheme implementation ............................................................... 39 References ............................................................................................................................................ 40 Appendix 1: Examples of the habitats, land‐use and restoration activities described in the report ... 44 iv Summary Relative to their land area, the Falkland Islands hold one of the largest stores of peatland carbon in the world. Until the mid 18th century, these peatlands developed with little or no human disturbance, and in the absence of herbivorous mammals. The subsequent settlement of the Islands and establishment of extensive livestock grazing, including historic over‐grazing and burning, have led to large‐scale ecological changes. These have included the decline of sensitive native species, notably coastal tussac grass, and peat erosion. Smaller areas have been affected by drainage, peat‐cutting and cultivation. As in many other peatland regions of the world, this combination of pressures has likely reduced the capacity of Falkland peats to sequester carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere through peat formation, and may have led to some areas becoming net sources of CO2 emissions. Changes in land‐management and restoration therefore offer the potential to deliver substantial climate change mitigation, both by reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emission rates in degraded areas (‘GHG reductions’), and by turning them back into actively carbon‐sequestering systems (‘GHG removals’) through restored peat formation and the expansion of above‐ground plant biomass. In this report, we consider the potential for a future Falkland Island carbon offsetting scheme. Such as scheme would provide a mechanism by which businesses, organisations and individuals could invest in land‐management and restoration schemes that would deliver GHG reductions or removals, delivering financial support to farmers and others to adopt sustainable land‐management practices, undertake restoration and increase the extent of ecologically valuable habitats. A critical requirement for any carbon offsetting scheme is a robust scientific evidence base, enabling the GHG emission savings associated with proposed intervention measures to be quantified and demonstrated. In this report we review the available evidence for the Falklands, as well as relevant data from comparable peatlands elsewhere, to estimate current rates of GHG emission from Falkland peatlands, together with the maximum rate of GHG removal that could be attained if all peatlands were restored to their natural condition. Given the scarcity of direct measurements from Falkland peatlands, and their unique characteristics, these estimates are highly uncertain, and data taken from other regions such as the UK may not be directly applicable. New data would therefore need to be collected in the Falklands to support scheme development, should it occur. Whilst highly uncertain, our initial assessment suggests that the maximum carbon offset potential from peatland restoration in the Falklands could be high, in the region of a million tonnes of CO2 equivalent per year. Based on the UK government’s shadow price for carbon, this could generate revenue of around £47 million per year for carbon offsets. The market for carbon offsetting is expected to grow rapidly due to the International Civil Aviation Organisation’s agreement to invest between £4 ‐18 billion per year to offset growth in international aviation emissions. Whilst sales into such markets may need to be balanced against the Falkland Islands’ own national targets in the future to avoid double counting, the
Recommended publications
  • ART/SMSG/SAERI Expedition Report: Hummock Island February 2021
    ART/SMSG/SAERI Expedition Report: Hummock Island February 2021 Significance of peat dust and terrestrial erosion for marine communities around Hummock Island Amy Guest, Dr Paul Brewin, Dr Paul Brickle, Dr Karen von Juterzenka, and Dr Klemens Pütz Cosmasterias lurida (beaded starfish) and Munida gregaria (lobster krill) on a peat covered sandy substrate, Hummock Island February 2021 ART/SMSG/SAERI expedition report: Hummock Island, February 2021 Logistics Expedition dates: 4 - 14th Feb 2021 (for Daily Log see Appendix 1; Dive log see Appendix 2) Vessels: SMSG Fram (5.8 m RHIB), launched from Roy Cove; Sailing Yacht Porvenir II. Accommodation: Roy Cove self-catering, ART House Hummock Island Participants: Dr Paul Brickle (Co-PI) Dr Paul Brewin (Co-PI) Steve Cartwright (Dive Officer / Coxswain) Joost Pompert (Scientist / Surveyor) Sacha Cleminson (Scientist / Surveyor) 4th – 8th February, N.B. flew out from Fox Bay. Amy Guest (PhD Student / Surveyor / Logistics) Sally Poncet (Antarctic Research Trust) Ken Passfield (Antarctic Research Trust) Background Hummock Island lies to the west of West Falkland (Figure 1). Like on other islands in the Falklands, Hummock Island´s rocky surface is covered by peat soil. Decades of grazing on the island has led to de- vegetation of about one third of the 303 ha and subsequent substantial erosion. Large areas were replaced by black ground indicating the extension and distribution of exposed peat soil. The Antarctic Research Trust (ART) is currently re-vegetating the island by tussac planting campaigns. Tussac roots and above ground blade structures will stabilise the peat soil and, moreover, will prove very efficient in storage of atmospheric carbon.
    [Show full text]
  • A Scoping Study for Potential Community-Based Carbon Offsetting Schemes in the Falkland Islands
    A SCOPING STUDY FOR POTENTIAL COMMUNITY-BASED CARBON OFFSETTING SCHEMES IN THE FALKLAND ISLANDS Chris Evans, Jonathan Ritson, Jim McAdam, Stefanie Carter, Andrew Stanworth and Katherine Ross Date: revised Sept 2020 Undertaken by Funded by Recommended citation: Evans, C. et al (2020). A scoping study for potential community‐based carbon offsetting schemes in the Falkland Islands. Report to Falklands Conservation, Stanley. Author affiliations: Chris Evans (UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology) Jonathan Ritson (University of Manchester), Jim McAdam (Queen’s University Belfast and Falkland Islands Trust), Stefanie Carter (South Atlantic Environmental Research Institute), Andrew Stanworth (Falklands Conservation) and Katherine Ross (Falklands Conservation). Falklands Conservation: Jubilee Villas, 41 Ross Road, Stanley, Falkland Islands Corresponding author: [email protected] www.falklandsconservation.com Charity Information: Falklands Conservation: Registered Charity No. 1073859. A company limited by guarantee in England & Wales No. 3661322 Registered Office: 2nd Floor, Regis House, 45 King William Street, London, EC4R 9AN Telephone: +44 (0) 1767 693710, [email protected] Registered as an Overseas Company in the Falkland Islands ii Contents A SCOPING STUDY FOR POTENTIAL COMMUNITY‐BASED CARBON OFFSETTING SCHEMES IN THE FALKLAND ISLANDS .................................................................................................................................. i Summary ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Abundance and Distribution of Striated Caracaras Phalcoboenus Australis on the Falkland Islands Micky Reeves &Am
    A review of the abundance and distribution of Striated Caracaras Phalcoboenus australis on the Falkland Islands Aniket Sardana Micky Reeves & Sarah Crofts Falklands Conservation, May 2015 The authors dedicate this report to Mr. Ian Strange and Mr. Robin Woods whose earlier surveys laid much ground work. This work was funded by: Falklands Conservation is a company limited by guarantee in England & Wales #3661322 and Registered Charity #1073859. Registered as an Overseas Company in the Falkland Islands. Roy Smith “These birds, generally known among sealers by the name of “Johnny” rook, partake of the form and nature of the hawk and crow… Their claws are armed with large and strong talons, like those of an eagle; they are exceedingly bold and the most mischievous of all the feathered creation. The sailors who visit these islands, being often much vexed at their predatory tricks, have bestowed different names upon them, characteristic of their nature, as flying monkeys, flying devils….” Charles Bernard 1812‐13 “A tameness or lack of wariness is an example of the loss of defensive adaptations.... an ecological naiveté…these animals aren’t imbeciles. Evolution has merely prepared them for a life in a world that is simpler and more innocent”…. where humans are entirely outside their experience. David Quammen (Island Biography in an age of extinction) 1996 1 ABSTRACT The Falkland Islands are globally important for the Striated Caracaras (Phalcoboenus australis). They reside mainly on the outer islands of the archipelago in strong associated with seabird populations, and where human interference is relatively low. A survey of the breeding population conducted in the austral summers of 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 indicates that the current population is likely to be the highest it has been for perhaps the last 100 years.
    [Show full text]
  • We Are Saeri Chairman’S Foreword
    WE ARE SAERI CHAIRMAN’S FOREWORD The annual report shows an Institute In the accounts for our second year as an growing in confidence. The foundations independent charity clearly show: and fundamentals established last year • We have achieved a near break-even WE ARE SAERI have been built upon successfully. budget in year 2 in the unrestricted The quality, dedication and talent of our funds, indicating sound financial staff remain central to the achievement of planning, management and tight our mission. It is their research excellence financial controls. and academic rigour that ensure our work • Careful cost controls resulting in a | CHAIRMAN is valued to international standards. It is slight decrease in operating expenditure their dedication and approach that have (£370,000 to £360,000), which wage helped us build new partnerships and and other inflationary pressures extend our reach. It is their commitment managed by strict financial oversight. to delivery and customer service that • Greater sophistication in the delivery of have seen income growth through our contracted activities through our trading commercial subsidiary, SAERI (Falklands) subsidiary resulting in increased Limited. Through our scientists’ work we recharges and donations to the charity have discovered more about the the world which contribute to its core costs. around us and moved the frontiers of knowledge. In addition, our work has repeatedly been independently tested and both our closed This year we have identified new species projects (Darwin Cetaceans and Natural – one of which now bears SAERI’s name - Capital Assessment (NCA)) and our and delivered excellent science. We have Group’s accounts have received brought more world class researchers unqualified audits.
    [Show full text]
  • Farming on the Peatlands of the Falkland Islands
    Farming on the peatlands of the Falkland Islands Jim McAdam Agri Food and Biosciences Institute, Queen’s University Belfast and the United Kingdom Falkland Islands Trust Abstract The Falkland Islands (Long 57-62°W; Lat51-53°S), land area 12,200km2 have a cool temperate (2.2°C.- 9.4°C), oceanic climate. Rainfall varies between 400-800mm and is lowest in spring. The islands were glaciated only on the highest ground with surrounding land affected by a periglacial environment. During the Post-glacial period acid, organic soils have formed mainly because of low temperature and the impervious clay-rich subsoil creating conditions which favour waterlogging. Upland peat, lowland peat or tussac (coastal) peat cover a large area of the entire land surface. Vegetation is typically dwarf shrub heath on drier soils and magellanic moorland on wetter soils. Agriculture is confined to extensive sheep farming in large enclosures (89% > c. 2000 ha). In the early days of the Colony (early 1800s) cattle roamed the islands and sheep were first introduced in the 1860s. They quickly became the main source of income on the (approx. 30) large farms which existed up until the early 1980s. Lord Shackleton’s Economic Survey (1976) recommending subdivision of the large farm units and transferring land ownership to local owners transformed the agricultural industry on the islands. Subsequently, the building of a certified abattoir in the early 2000s created further major opportunities. Traditionally, pasture improvement through reseeding and fertilising was practiced only on a very small scale. Recently the development of pastures with improved grasses and legumes coupled with rotational grazing has received much greater priority than previously.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution, Abundance and Population Trends of Gentoo, Rockhopper and King Penguins in the Falkland Islands
    The distribution, abundance and population trends of gentoo, rockhopper and king penguins in the Falkland Islands M. Bingham The Falkland Islands are a globally important breeding location for seabirds, including penguins. The total breeding populations of three of the four main penguin species present in the Falklands were censused in the austral summer of1995/96. The results for gentoo and rockhopper penguins suggest declines of about 43 and 90 per cent, respectively, since a similar census in 1932/33. Recent monitoring studies suggest that these declines are still continuing; research to investigate causes (which is likely to reflect changes in the marine, rather than terrestrial environment) is a high priority. In contrast, king penguin populations, currently c. 400 pairs, have increased steadily, by 700 per cent since 1980/81, in line with world-wide trends for this species. Introduction The Falklands' population of king penguin Aptenodytes patagonicus is very small, but was The Falkland Islands lie in the south-west still included in the census. The fourth main Atlantic, approximately 450 km north-east of Falklands' penguin, the magellanic penguin the southern tip of South America. The archi- Spheniscus magellanicus, was not included in pelago is made up of two main islands and this census because of the difficulties of cen- several hundred smaller islands, which are susing a species that nests in burrows. home to large numbers of breeding seabirds, including penguins. The Falkland Islands have the world's largest breeding population of Methods rockhopper penguins Eudyptes c. chrysocome, and the second largest population of gentoo Most breeding-site locations were already penguins Pygoscelis papua (Croxall et al., 1984).
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Assessment of Endangered Sei Whales ( Balaenoptera Borealis ) in Two Candidate Key Biodiversity Areas in West Falkland
    A preliminary assessment of endangered sei whales ( Balaenoptera borealis ) in two candidate Key Biodiversity Areas in West Falkland Author: Dr Caroline Weir, Sei Whale Project Officer Produced by: Falklands Conservation, Jubilee Villas, Ross Road, Stanley, Falkland Islands Version: 1.2 Date: 3 September 2018 1 CONTENTS Contents .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Non-Technical Summary ........................................................................................................................ 6 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 10 1.1. Rationale ............................................................................................................................... 10 1.2. Report format ........................................................................................................................ 11 1.3. Research permits ................................................................................................................... 11 2. Aims and Objectives ..................................................................................................................... 12 3. Study Area ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of the Falkland Islands
    THE GEOLOGY OF THE FALKLAND ISLANDS D T Aldiss and E J Edwards British Geological Survey Technical Report THE GEOLOGY OF THE FALKLAND ISLANDS NOTES FOR DIGITAL VERSION This British Geological Survey Technical Report WC/99/10 is available in a digital version and in a paper version. The contents of this digital version of the report are identical to those of the paper version, except that Figures 1.2 and 4.11 are presented here both in colour and in monochrome. The monochrome version is held on the page following the colour version. Links have been provided between the Contents Pages and the body of the report. Links exist for Chapter headings, second-order section headings, Figures, Plates and Tables. To activate these links, double-click on the relevant line in the Contents Pages. If the software command ‘Go to (page number)’ is used to move through the document, note that although page numbers appear only on the text pages, the software will count all the pages consecutively, treating the Cover Page as page 1, and the Contents Pages as pages 5 to 9, inclusive. Paper copies of this report are available from the Department of Mineral Resources, Ross Road, Stanley, Falkland Islands, telephone (0) 500 27322 or fax (0) 500 27321, e-mail > [email protected], or from BGS Sales, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, UK telephone (0) 44 115 936 3241 or fax (0) 44 115 936 3488, e-mail > [email protected] BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Overseas Geology Series TECHNICAL REPORT WC/99/10 THE GEOLOGY OF THE FALKLAND ISLANDS D T Aldiss and E J Edwards This report is a product of the Falkland Islands Geological Mapping Project, funded by the Falkland Islands Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Mussel Bed Infaunal Community Structure and Function at Local, Regional and Biogeographic Scales
    Patterns of mussel bed infaunal community structure and function at local, regional and biogeographic scales A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Andrew James Richardson (BSc. (Hons) Coastal Marine Biology) List of contents List of figures iv List of tables vi List of plates viii Acknowledgements ix Chapter 1 – General Introduction 1.1 Ecological diversity 1 1.2 Functional Groups 5 1.3 Spatial scales in ecology 11 1.4 Temperate intertidal systems 13 1.5 Mytilus edulis 23 1.6 Aims of the present work 38 Chapter 2 – Optimal sampling and assemblage description 2.1 Introduction 41 2.2 Methods 46 2.2.1 Site description 46 2.2.2 Sampling regime 47 2.2.3 Data analysis 50 2.2.3.1 Comparison of species-area curves between SITE and SEASON 50 2.2.3.2 Comparison of assemblage similarity between quadrat sizes 52 2.3 Results 53 2.3.1 Comparison of species area curves between SITE and SEASON 53 2.3.2 Comparison of assemblage structure between quadrat sizes 56 2.4 Discussion 58 Chapter 3 – A Functional Grouping Approach to Infaunal Research 3.1 Introduction 63 3.2 Methods 66 3.2.1 Sampling regime 66 3.2.1.1 Feeding function approach 67 3.2.1.2 Reproductive mode function approach 69 i List of contents 3.2.2 Data analysis 71 3.2.2.1 Species level approach 71 3.2.2.2 Feeding function approach 73 3.2.2.3 Reproductive mode function approach 74 3.2.2.4 Comparison of approaches 74 3.3 Results 75 3.3.1 Variation in assemblage structure using the species level approach 75 3.3.2 Assemblage variation with a feeding function approach 82 3.3.3 Assemblage variation with a reproductive mode function approach 89 3.3.4 Comparison of approaches 96 3.4 Discussion 99 Chapter 4 – How do infaunal assemblage patterns vary at large biogeographical scales and what drives them? 4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Scoping Study for Potential Community-Based Carbon Offsetting Schemes in the Falkland Islands
    A SCOPING STUDY FOR POTENTIAL COMMUNITY-BASED CARBON OFFSETTING SCHEMES IN THE FALKLAND ISLANDS Chris Evans, Jonathan Ritson, Jim McAdam, Stefanie Carter, Andrew Stanworth and Katherine Ross Date: revised Sept 2020 Undertaken by Funded by Recommended citation: Evans, C. et al (2020). A scoping study for potential community‐based carbon offsetting schemes in the Falkland Islands. Report to Falklands Conservation, Stanley. Author affiliations: Chris Evans (UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology) Jonathan Ritson (University of Manchester), Jim McAdam (Queen’s University Belfast and Falkland Islands Trust), Stefanie Carter (South Atlantic Environmental Research Institute), Andrew Stanworth (Falklands Conservation) and Katherine Ross (Falklands Conservation). Falklands Conservation: Jubilee Villas, 41 Ross Road, Stanley, Falkland Islands Corresponding author: [email protected] www.falklandsconservation.com Charity Information: Falklands Conservation: Registered Charity No. 1073859. A company limited by guarantee in England & Wales No. 3661322 Registered Office: 2nd Floor, Regis House, 45 King William Street, London, EC4R 9AN Telephone: +44 (0) 1767 693710, [email protected] Registered as an Overseas Company in the Falkland Islands ii Contents A SCOPING STUDY FOR POTENTIAL COMMUNITY‐BASED CARBON OFFSETTING SCHEMES IN THE FALKLAND ISLANDS .................................................................................................................................. i Summary ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 6 September 2010 Long Term and Recent Changes in Sea Level in the Falkland Islands P.L. Woodworth, D.T. Pugh National Oceanogr
    6 September 2010 Long Term and Recent Changes in Sea Level in the Falkland Islands P.L. Woodworth, D.T. Pugh National Oceanography Centre, Joseph Proudman Building, 6 Brownlow Street, Liverpool L3 5DA, United Kingdom and R.M. Bingley Institute of Engineering Surveying and Space Geodesy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD Abstract Mean sea level measurements made at Port Louis in the Falkland Islands in 1981-2, 1984 and 2009, together with values from the nearby permanent tide gauge at Port Stanley, have been compared to measurements made at Port Louis in 1842 by James Clark Ross. The long-term rate of change of sea level is estimated to have been +0.75 ± 0.35 mm/year between 1842 and the early 1980s, after correction for air pressure effects and for vertical land movement due to Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA). The 2009 Port Louis data set is of particular importance due to the availability 1 of simultaneous information from Port Stanley. The data set has been employed in two ways, by providing a short recent estimate of mean sea level itself, and by enabling the effective combination of measurements at the two sites. The rate of sea level rise observed since 1992, when the modern Stanley gauge was installed, has been larger at 2.51 ± 0.58 mm/year, after correction for air pressure and GIA. This rate compares to a value of 2.79 ± 0.42 mm/year obtained from satellite altimetry in the region over the same period. Such a relatively recent acceleration in the rate of sea level rise is consistent with findings from other locations in the southern hemisphere and globally.
    [Show full text]
  • BEST Ecosystem Profile of the South Atlantic Region
    EUROPEAN OVERSEAS REGIONAL ECOSYSTEM PROFILE South Atlantic Ascension Island Saint Helena Tristan da Cunha Falkland Islands (Malvinas) This document has been developed as part of the project ‘Measures towards Sustaining the BEST Preparatory Action to promote the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity and ecosystem services in EU Outermost EU Outermost Regions and Overseas Countries and Territories’. The document does not represent an official, formal position of the European Commission. JUNE2016 2016 Service contract 07.0307.2013/666363/SER/B2 Prepared by: South Atlantic Environmental Research Institute (SAERI) And with the technical support of: IUCN CEPF Drafted by the BEST team of the South Atlantic hub: Maria Taylor Under the coordination of: Dr Paul Brickle and Tara Pelembe Assisted by individual experts and contributors from the following institutions: Ascension Island: Ascension Island Government Conservation Department Dr Sam Weber Dr Judith Brown Dr Andy Richardson Dr Nicola Weber Emma Nolan Kate Downes University of Exeter Dr Annette Broderick Dr Brendon Godley St Helena: St Helena Government Isabel Peters Samantha Cherrett Annalea Beard Elizabeth Clingham Derek Henry Mike Jervois Lourens Malan Dr Jill Keys Ross Towers Paul Cherrett St Helena National Trust Jeremy Harris Rebecca Cairn-Wicks David Pryce Dennis Leo Acting Governor Sean Burns Independent Dr Andre Aptroot Dr Phil Lambdon Ben Sansom Tristan da Cunha: Tristan da Cunha Government Trevor Glass James Glass Katrine Herian Falkland Islands: Falkland Island Government
    [Show full text]