Title Legal Bulletin

June, 2014 - Volume: 2, Issue 6 c IN THIS BULLETIN HIGHLIGHTS: English News 2-19 CJ forms three-judge bench to hear anti-judiciary TV program 02 Non-bailable arrest warrants for Gilani, Faheem issued 02 SHC reserves ruling on plea seeking removal of 03 Humanitarian 20 Musharraf's name from ECL Interventions Zardari acquitted in polo ground case 03 a IHC rejects petition against 3G, 4G auction 04 c a Pemra to act against shutting Geo, changing its number on 05 c Articles 21-22 cable, SC told

Zardari to be on court’s radar till LHC probe finalisation 06 a c a c a Maps 23 No one to be allowed to undermine dignity of 06 c SC: Justice Jawwad Geo case: SC seeks reply from federal govt, Pemra 08 a c Urdu News 24-33 a Musharraf seeks re-framing of charges in treason case 08 c People starving to death but nobody cares: SC 09 Legal Directory 34-36 Court reinstates Zaka as PCB chief 10 a c a a c c

MAPS AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR LEGAL PROFILE N " 0 ' 0 ° 5 3 N " 0 ' 0 ° 4 3 N " 0 ' 0 ° 3 3 ) E E c " " i 0 0 K ' ' a h c 0 0 ° ° p 5 5 & 0 y 7 7 a J r r 4 g a 4 A o y ( 1 d e

r 0 t n G a 2 s r m

t o u , 1 s c 4 d . u r 0 t n 6 n 2 8 o

a r n

o u 1 s o ©

a i t l S u B u h i o l t h t s C

r a g l r i G

r o o r a p 3 @ C y s t u a e e

p p m W A A C B o t a o

o C n S c m c i

- | e m

n 0

o 4 a c t c t n C d 2 e s i i i e

2 a 3 ¯ a m v r c r r 7 r c e : h . v l h e i 3 L E o a p s l s i 4 . l o m s t s t e 8 g w i / I i i R i u r

o e 4

u w a

6 : s t

c t w K 0 a d S D D P

h P H S e 5 a r c . g t F i i 6 0

D 8 R a

/ n 4

l . : l 1

1 D n m A e

. e o

z 2 O n i h i 9

t + o

S s i g c

t ; ; e a e ; a ;

a a j

c c e g

e o

r 0 K a r

L C P P P R

e c

L i

A c

E G n

a i

L d

n c a c I a c I R a l n e a o i c n i t M r l a B P o S t a a c H S n e o i c i t n l e K A a o i c c i t

a l P o S t a c a c n t a n P o S t a e n e a o o e a i c r i o c c D i t i i c i t a l l i t c u l h P o S t a P o S t a K P o S t a a a , N c a i c n E E c t " " e o o n 0 0 a i ' ' c e a h o i t 0 0 c i r l c ° ° w a i t 4 4 A a c l a 7 7 h L P o S t a

t P o S t a C a s c c t i a r r n n c t c e e u a o o s i i U c r c i o i i t i t f i l j l D C a a r H P o S t a T P o S t a a n c a a e ; M o c c e n i c i t r r c i o l i i i r l u n t a l m p s o P o S t a r t i e h P o w i n M a r s h s S t a e a c o n u M s n k i a c a s

e t e i l t r o o e o t l k i s K c i h c c a a s

i t t i c c S e C i t a l r t i i l g r r A d B l r r h t T P o S t a

a u t a t n u s a n C P o S t a s i o z s P o S t a B c c ; o P o i o t i a a i K

a D C r A r c i t c D C t J r u t i t y J s i n ; A d i a o a

e l o c ; S t a C ; n D H C i n c n f a i t a a e d e h o l l c o ; n y o i c i t a c c

n i t D t i d t o t l l a n P a P o S t a r a

u t i t a e n u p a u P o D S t a P o S B o a u t a

a m a c S t t A r c C n c

D e

e u m o e i c g e i n c P a i p a c i t h l e

n r i o l r J m l i i n c d

n a e i t e a e o l a d M o P o c r i c P o S t a M i

i , z P o G i N t l a r t p l I a i z a P o S t a A c t y n c i A A Z a A m o P o S u P o S t a T c i

S t a C r h t n t a a e c s r t y o c i h r i t e c a n u i t g a a e S t a l C o i o K i c d h a i t H C c l d P o S t a C a r t ) t c S a P o S t a e n r r ; ; e h K a o u u i t e m c c g i t & i o o e a l J r H C h C p S t a C P o ( A a a c r e a n ; ; c S u c a e c n ) t o e i i r d c l o t i K i l u d m t & o e P o J r S t a S a P o C

p S t a ( A t y i S u

N " 0 ' 0 ° 5 3 N " 0 ' 0 ° 4 3 N " 0 ' 0 ° 3 3

ISSN 2312-136X 205-C 2nd Floor, Evacuee Trust Complex, F-5/1, Islamabad, Pakistan Landline: +92.51.2820449, Fax: +92.51.835.9287 E-mail: [email protected], Website: www.alhasan.com 1

©Copyright 2014 ISSN 2312-136X ALHASAN SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED 205-C 2nd Floor, Evacuee Trust Complex, Sector F-5/1, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan For information: Landline: +92 51 2820449 Email: [email protected] Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/alhasan.com Twitter: @alhasansystems Website: www.alhasan.com

ALHASAN SYSTEMS is registered with the Security & Exchange Commission of Pakistan under section 32 of the Companies Ordinance 1984 (XL VII of 1984). ALHASAN is issuing this Legal Bulletin free of cost for general public benefit and informational purposes only. Should you have any feedback or require for further details and Metadata information please call us at Landline: +92 51 2820449, Fax: +92 51 835 9287 or email at [email protected].

LEGAL NOTICES The information in this publication, including text, images, and links, are provided "AS IS" by ALHASAN SYSTEMS solely as a convenience to its clients and general public without any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement. ALHASAN SYSTEMS assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in this publication or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this publication. This publication could include technical or other inaccuracies, and not all information/ services referenced herein are available in all areas. Changes are periodically added to the publication, and ALHASAN may change the information or services described in this publication at any time.

Should you choose to respond directly to ALHASAN SYSTEMS with comments, questions, suggestions, ideas or the like relating to this publication and ALHASAN SYSTEMS other services and products, you agree that such information shall be deemed as non-confidential and ALHASAN SYSTEMS shall have no obligation to respond and be free to reproduce, use, disclose and distribute the information to others without limitation, including but not limited to developing, manufacturing, and marketing products incorporating such information. For further explanation of these legal notices please contact [email protected].

NEWS HEADLINES DETAILS

CJ forms three-judge bench to ISLAMABAD: The Chief Justice of Pakistan has formed a three-member bench to hear a case pertaining to an anti-judiciary program telecast by a private TV channel. The bench headed by hear anti-judiciary TV program Ijazul Hassan will hear the case on June 2. A statement issued by the apex court on Saturday The News 31st May, 2014 says honorable justice Jawad S Khawaja has not been separated from any case and he will continue to hear the “banner case.” Justice Khawaja will hear the case on June 10.

Non-bailable arrest warrants for KARACHI: An anti-corruption court in Karachi on Thursday issued non-bailable arrest warrants for former prime minister Yusuf Raza Gilani and senior Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) leader Gilani, Faheem issued Makhdoom Amin Faheem. The warrants against the two were issued in a case relating to The News 30th May, 2014 financial irregularities in the Trade Development Authority of Pakistan (TDAP). Subsequently, the court adjourned the hearing till June 17. The case in this regard had been registered by the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) when Amin Faheem was Commerce Minister.Gilani and Fahim had been accused of involvement in Rs7 billion financial scam in TDAP. Muhammad Firdous, the key accused, turned approver against the former prime minister and former federal minister. The court had previously issued three notices to Gilani and Faheem, requiring them to appear before it. The notices were ignored after which bailable arrest warrants were issued against both the leaders. On Thursday, however, the court issued non-bailable arrest warrants and adjourned the hearing till June 17. Meanwhile, Syed Yusuf Raza Gilani said that he would appear in the Accountability Court, Islamabad on June 4 and also ATC court in Karachi in TDAP case adding he had been facing fabricated cases in the past and would face these now as well. In a statement issued here Gilani said that he was only one who had received the notices to appear in the court adding that he was determined to defend himself as he had done in the past. He said if the competent appointing authority was to be held responsible, no one could be spared if the intentions were motivated by vendetta.He advised the Ministry of Interior and the present government to bring out all the cases against him and his sons in order to avoid the implications of double jeopardy. He lamented that no case in this country was completed without implicating him whether it was case of Ogra, NICL, NRO, TDAP or Haj scam. The beneficiaries of the NRO had been exonerated but he was still facing the music. “These are classic examples of miscarriage of justice,” he said. He said that his sons had been implicated in false cases while his other son was kidnapped and they knew the amount of torture his family was going through.He asked the government to avoid crossing the limits of victimisation and unleash it to the extent they could also bear it tomorrow. They had no stomach to tolerate even the fraction of what was going on against him, he observed.

IHC declares regularisation of ISLAMABAD: Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Thursday declared null and void recommendations of the former PPP government’s cabinet subcommittee, daily wage, contract employees headed by Syed Khursheed Shah, for the regularisation of daily wage and contract employees of void the federal government. Justice Siddiqui, in his decision, observed that the recommendations The News 30th May, 2014 regarding the employees who were appointed without following rules and competitive process carry no weight. He directed all the institutions/organisations of the federal government to properly examine and verify the record of the regularised employees and only endorse regularisation of those employees who fulfil the criteria in respect of educational qualification, experience, age and domicile. The petition was filed in the court by the senior employees of National Highways Authority (NHA), seeking de-regularisation of contractual and daily wage employees who were regularised by the former government’s cabinet subcommittee. Counsel for the NHA employees Tariq Mehmood Jehangiri argued before the court that all these employees were first appointed at nepotism basis in complete disregard to educational qualification, age, experience, domicile and vacant posts. These employees were inducted without any test or interview, and later the cabinet’s subcommittee recommended their regularisation. The committee’s decision has been affecting the seniority of previous employees. Jehangiri produced a list of around 350 employees before the court and told the court around 90 people in this list belong to Multan, 60 to Sukkur and the rest to the electoral constituencies of some other MNAs of the former PPP government. Jehngiri further told the court that the NHA has been paying Rs12 billion per annum on account of salaries to these persons. The Rs12 billion is taken from the amount that the NHA had to spend for road development. Referring to a Supreme Court judgment, Jehangiri said that the Supreme Court, in the case of Employee Old Age Benefits on March 17 this year, had declared the appointments of 238 employees as null and void. For the recently regularised employees, no posts were created before their induction. The defence counsel counter argued that if the cabinet subcommittee’s recommendations were declared null and void, thousands of workers would get unemployed. Justice Siddiqui remarked that we have buried the ‘Doctrine of Necessity’ and everything should be done on merit.

Govt should assure poor will ISLAMABAD: Justice Jawwad S Khawaja on Wednesday remarked that the government should tell if cure to poor people lies in death, asking the authorities to assure the court that no poor will not starve to death: SC die of hunger. Justice Jawwad gave these remarks while presiding over a two-member bench of The News 29th May, 2014 the Supreme Court during the course of hearing of Jamaat-e-Islami leader Liaquat Baloch’s petition on the prices of flour (Atta). Liaquat Baloch was also present in the court during the hearing. During the course of hearing, Justice Jawwad remarked: “Government has set up the Utility Stores at such places where the poor people don’t live. The government should tell if dying is the treatment of the poor person.” He further observed: “It is a matter of concern that the poor are dying of hunger and no one is realising. It is beyond our comprehension that essential commodities are not available to the people to lead their life. How the rulers go to sleep. We

cannot sleep. It is the common motive of government, judges and lawyers that basic necessities of life should be provided to the poor people. Sassi kept on sleeping and Punnoo was taken away by his brothers. This should not happen.” Justice Jawwad remarked: “We all are one and united for the betterment of oppressed people of this nation. There is no politics. Liaquat Baloch is in opposition party. All parties are ours and we don’t make any distinction between the parties. It is ordained in the Holy Quran, ‘Whosoever makes distinction be dealt with sternly.’ We will do justice with all. I had seen picture of Liaquat Baloch in the newspaper.” Liaqat Baloch said: “I show my self in person to you.”Justice Jawwad remarked: “We had got conducted a research. Legislation was enacted six months back which has also been incorporated in it. We don’t know to what extent this legislation will prove effective. There is no food security in the country; therefore, wheat and grains are not becoming available. People are too much disturbed. Interest of all of us lies in access of people to wheat. It is said about me I am overstepping. But I will do in this matter whatever I can. I have said fifty times, Hazrat Omer had said, ‘Omar will be asked about it if a dog dies on the bank of river Dajla.’” The Ministry of Food Security and Research secretary told the court that the government has taken steps. A sum of Rs700 million will be spent on 550, 000,0 families under Benazir Income Support Programme at the rate of Rs1,200 per family. As many as 6,000 Utility Stores are operating in the country and we are going to increase this number. Commodities are provided to the poor people at subsidised rate here. Justice Jawwad remarked: “How you make sure the purchases by the poor person at these stores.”The secretary said utility stores are functioning in such areas in Islamabad where the poor segments of society are living. Rafiq Rajwana said subsidy is being allowed to those people who don’t need it and nothing is being given to them for whom this subsidy is meant for.The court directed amicus curiae Rafiq Rajwana and secretary ministry of food security and research to present report before it on June 9 about the steps taken by the federal and provincial governments practically for provision of essential commodities to the people. The hearing of the case was adjourned till June 9.

SHC reserves ruling on plea KARACHI: The Sindh High Court (SHC) on Thursday reserved its ruling on a petition calling for the removal of the name of former military ruler Gen (retd) Pervez Musharraf from the exit control seeking removal of Musharraf's list, DawnNews reported. A two-judge bench of the SHC, headed by Justice Muhammad Ali name from ECL Mazhar, heard the petition. The ruling was reserved after Musharraf's counsel Barrister Farogh Dawn 29th May, 2014 Naseem and Attorney General Pakistan Salman Aslam Butt concluded their arguments on the matter. Naseem stated in his arguments that Musharraf's name should be removed from the ECL as his backbone had a fracture and the requisite treatment was not possible in Pakistan. He added that the case against Musharraf did not involve charges of treason but of abrogating the country's constitution. Naseem further said that Musharraf was being victimised and that his trial was being pursued for political reasons and not to ensure the administration of justice. Speaking to media representatives, Butt said that if Musharraf managed to leave the country, he would not return. He added that Musharraf did not trust the judicial process to work in his favour, adding that the cases against the former army strongman were of a grave nature. The attorney general insisted that Musharraf was faced with treason charges, adding that deciding on whether or not to remove his name from the ECL did not fall within the remit of the SHC.

2 accused held, more to be ISLAMABAD - The Attorney General on Wednesday informed the Supreme Court that two persons have been arrested regarding display of banners and posters in the heart of federal netted, SC told capital. Attorney General for Pakistan Salman Butt submitted the reports of Interior Secretary and The Nation 29th May, 2014 DG Intelligence Bureau to the court. According to Secretary Ministry of Interior report Shafiq Butt and his two accomplices Muhammad Nazar and Muhammad Waqar have taken into custody and investigation was going on and an FIR 234/14 has been registered. The AGP sought some time for the completion of investigation and the arrest of other accused against which the police had gathered information for their involvement in hanging of the banners and posters. A two-judge comprising Jawwad S Khawaja and Justice Mushir Alam was hearing the petition of Geo TV against blocking its transmission by the cable operators. The attorney general said the banners were not against a person but the Supreme Court as an institution. He further told that the banners have been removed from various places of Islamabad. The Anjuman-e-Tajran had disowned that they were behind placing the banners and posters in the federal capital, he added. The court asked the AGP not to arrest any innocent persons but don't spare the accused, how influential they are. "We have to get to the bottom of this happening." Taufiq Asif, ex-president Lahore High Court Bar Association, Rawalpindi bench, pointed out that the administrations have not arrested the main culprits. He said a few persons had come in Vego and Parado put up banners and posters from 11 p.m. to 5 a.m. in various parts of Islamabad but now the administration say they did not know. Ex-president LHCBA, Rawalpindi bench said the police should arrest those who had given order and money for hanging the banners. The attorney general also informed the court that the Pemra had issued notice to the ARY for airing obnoxious programme on 26th May. Justice Jawwad on Tuesday while hearing the missing person case referring to a television talk show aired on ARY Monday night, which contained scurrilous accusation against the judge, had directed the attorney general to find out who was trying to attack and damage the prestige of the institution, particularly the apex court. The case was adjourned till 10th June.

Zardari acquitted in polo ground ISLAMABAD: An accountability court on Wednesday acquitted former president Asif Ali Zardari in the polo ground corruption reference, DawnNews reported. The court announced the verdict case saying the accused had not been proven guilty so far. It further stated that evidence against the Dawn 28th May, 2014 former president was not sufficient for further proceedings. This reference builds upon the construction of a polo ground along with ancillary works at the Prime Minister House, which NAB

says are illegal and in violation of the rights and privileges that were afforded to Zardari. In February, the court had reserved its judgment on the application of the former president seeking acquittal in the corruption reference. The reference filed in 2000 alleged that the polo ground at the Prime Minister House was constructed during the second tenure of former prime minister Benazir Bhutto on the verbal orders of her husband Asif Ali Zardari to CDA chairmen Saeed Mehdi and Shafi Sehwani at an estimated cost of Rs52.29 million. The NAB in the reference nominated the two former CDA chairmen as the principal accused. It was alleged that both the former CDA chiefs got sheds constructed and carried out landscaping in a portion of the Prime Minister House and converted it into a polo ground. The other references filed against Zardari are: SGS: This corruption case is the continuance of a reference filed in 1997 that accused the late Benazir Bhutto and her spouse Zardari to have gained off a contract between the SGS and the government. ARY: This reference revolves around granting of trade licenses to ARY Traders for importing gold and silver which NAB says has caused losses to the treasury. Ursus tractors: This reference deals with alleged corruption during the import of Russian and Polish tractors. Cotecna: This case is about the award of a contract to the Swiss company after allegedly receiving six per cent bribe on the revenue proceeds.

SHC gives govt last chance to KARACHI: The Sindh High Court on Tuesday gave the provincial law officer a last chance to file comments on a petition filed by the Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) against amendments in the Sindh Local file comments Government (Amendment) Act. In the petition, JI’s Karachi chief Hafiz Naeem-ur-Rehman states The News 28th May, 2014 that amendments in the SLGA are in violation of fundamental rights of the public. He said contesting elections by forming a panel excluded independent individuals and candidates from contesting the election and deprived people from exercising their fundamental rights guaranteed under the constitution. The petitioner’s counsel Advocate Rasheed A Razvi said that that impugned amendments in the SLGA also deprive residents of Sindh, especially those of Karachi, from voting for candidates of their choice and will end up electing that panel at the local level which they did not like. He said the amendments will promote vested interests of certain political parties and create difficulties in transparent decision making. Advocate Razvi said the amendments will not only confuse voters about choosing the candidate they liked in their electoral area but will also deprive thousands of people from voting because many may not participate in the local bodies polls to choose panels, which he said would be sheer negation of the spirit of democracy.He said revenue authorities and the police were under the directly answerable to the Sindh government and there was a very good chance of them being influenced by to revenue officials for deciding and dealing with the election matters was an unlawful exercise. The counsel requested the court to declare that petitioners were entitled to contest local bodies’ election from union councils and committees without forming or joining a panel of candidates, along with the election of a chairman and vice chairman by a panel on nine elected candidates by a show of hands. He said this was in violation of Article 19 of the constitution and asked the court to stay the local government election till it disposed of the petition. He also requested the court on behalf of the petitioner to order the government to a reserved seat for youth to promote healthy and effective functioning of the elected union committee or councils, besides asking for bio-metric verification of voters. As the matter was taken up, the provincial law officer yet again sought time for filing comments on behalf of the government and was granted one last chance by the SHC division bench headed by Chief Justice Maqbool Baqar. Plea against ECP order Meanwhile in another hearing, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) defended its order regarding the inspection of documents for six polling stations of the Sindh Assembly constituency PS-93 in Karachi. The court was seized by a petition filed by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) MPA Syed Hafeezuddin against an ECP order which allowed an application by Jamaat-e-Islami’s Abdul Razzak for re-examination of documents for six polling stations of the constituency. The ECP stated in court that the impugned order had been passed in accordance with the law and was not contradictory to Article 225 of the constitution. After taking comments of the ECP on record, the court adjourned the hearing. Judges appointment case In yet another hearing the SHC dismissed a petition seeking to order the judicial commission to consider names of senior session’s judges — appointed as judges of the high court after the Provisional Constitutional Order (PCO) on November 3, 2007 — for fresh appointments as judges in the SHC. Petitioner Nadeem Khan stated that senior session’s judges including Sofia Latif, Syed Zakir Hussain, Arshad Noor Khan, Ali Sain Dino Metlo, Qamruddin Bohra and Zafar Ahmed Khan Sherwani had been elevated as high court judges after the PCO but their appointments were subsequently declared unconstitutional after the Supreme Court judgment on July 31, 2009. He said that the session’s judges had taken oath of the office after the PCO due to imposition of Emergency in the country and they should be considered for fresh appointments in the high court on seniority basis. Meanwhile, the court was informed by the counsel of sessions judge Sofia Latif that the petitioner has used her name without her instruction and had she been informed earlier she would not have allowed her name to be used in the petition. The counsel prayed to the court to expunge the name of sessions judge Sofia Latif from the petition, following which the court dismissed the petition.

IHC rejects petition against 3G, ISLAMABAD - The Islamabad High Court (IHC) turned down a petition on Monday challenging the public auction of 3G and 4G spectrums. The IHC single bench comprising Justice Shaukat 4G auction Aziz Siddiqui conducted the hearing of the petition moved by Ch Muhammad Akram Sajid The Nation 27th May, 2014 through his counsel Raja Muqsit Nawaz Khan Advocate and dismissed it after hearing preliminary arguments of the counsel. The petitioner had cited federation of Pakistan through secretary ministry of IT, chairman Pakistan telecommunication authority (PTA), M/s Pakistan Mobile Communication Limited (Mobilink), M/s Telenor Pakistan, M/s Pakistan Telecom Mobile Limited (Ufone), M/s CM Pak Limited (Zong) and M/s Warid Telecom as respondents in his petition. The

counsel stated in the petition that petitioner has come to this court in public interest litigation against the so-called public auction of 3G and 4G spectrum by the respondents without lawful authority and, therefore, it should be declared void, illegal and without legal effect. “The respondents had acted in excess of their jurisdiction in violation of principles of fair play and transparency. There was an apparent error and such excess of jurisdiction had resulted in manifestation of injustice to the people at large throughout Pakistan and heavy loss to the public exchequer,” he argued. Raja Muqsit informed the court that in pursuance of the policy directive on spectrum auction for next generation mobile services, the respondent number 2 initiated the process of auction of 3G/4G services in Pakistan and he published the final information memorandum on March 17, 2014. The petitioner contended that chairman PTA in fragrant violation of provisions of information memorandum and PEPRA laws, colluded with existing telecom operators (bidders) with mala fide intention to artificially reduce the 3G/4G spectrum price and caused major loss to national exchequer and auctioned this valuable national asset at very low price. “The under-valuation is also evident from the value at which India has recently auctioned 3G spectrum. India has sold the spectrum at US $22 billion while Pakistan did it at only less than US $1 billion. Indian mobile market is 5 to 6 times bigger than our market and their annual ARPUs are only 20 per cent higher than Pakistan. But, PTA has auctioned 3G spectrum at 22 times less price compared to Indian auction,” maintained Raja Muqsit. He contended that this is also rumoured that Warid was purposely asked not to bid to avoid any serious auction and promised to be given 4G spectrums later as compensation. This is also confirmed from the recent text message by Warid to its customers that it will soon be launching 4G services whereas Warid neither participated in the auction nor was awarded any 4G spectrum. “Since respondent number 7 has not participated in the bidding process, it should not be awarded or allowed to use 3G/4G spectrum,” said the petitioner. The petitioner’s counsel stated that in view of the abovementioned arguments, it has become evident that PTA and bidders in collusion have caused heavy losses of billions of dollars to people of Pakistan by auctioning 3G/4G spectrum at very low price. “The entire auction process including fixing the reserved price and change in number of available 3G spectrum lots at the eleventh hour was dominated by personal interest, mischief, corruption, non- transparent and collusion,” said the petitioner. Therefore, he prayed to the court that the auction procedure adopted by PTA is tainted, mala fide, collusive, non-transparent, non-competitive, illegal and clear violation of PEPRA laws; hence it be quashed and fresh auction be conducted in transparent manner in accordance with law. He further requested the court that in the meantime, the operators be restrained from using the 3G/4G spectrum as is being done even before the issuance of licences.

Pemra to act against shutting ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) on Monday assured the Supreme Court (SC) that strict action would be taken against the cable operators for Geo, changing its number on suspending the transmission and changing the position of Geo television channels on the cable cable, SC told network. A two-member bench of the apex court comprising Justice Jawwad S Khawaja and The News 27th May, 2014 Justice Gulzar Ahmed disposed of the petition, filed by the Independent Media Corporation (IMC) on the behalf of Geo network against the negative propaganda by other channels and for resumption of its transmission on cable networks. Zahid Malik, the head of the Pemra legal department, assured the apex court that its decision of 2012 would be implemented in letter and spirit. all the regions in the country to take strict action against the cable operators for blocking Geo TV transmission on cable network. Under the 2012 decision, cable operators cannot block channels without their licence being cancelled or suspended by Pemra.The IMC had filed a Civil Miscellaneous Application (CMA) in the Constitution Petition No 51 of 2010 for revival of the said petition. It was prayed to the apex court to order the revival of above titled Constitution Petition in the interest of justice, equity and fair play; and may further be pleased to act strictly in accordance with the report of Javed Jabbar appointed as mediator with the consent of the respondents in almost a similar episode and the mediation having been accepted by the respondents for reshuffling or blocking of the petitioner channel be restrained along with any other relief that the august court may graciously deem appropriate. The court also issued notice to Attorney General for Pakistan for May 28 in another petition, filed by Independent Media Corporation against the negative propaganda by other TV channels. The petitioner had prayed the court to issue directives to restrain all channels, including Geo, from airing allegations against other channels or media groups.The petition was filed against the backdrop of a smear campaign against the television network by rival media groups kick started after May 14 morning show aired a performance by some Qawwal. The petitioner prayed to the court to order the law enforcement and investigation agencies and lower courts all over the country to submit copies of all the criminal complaints, FIRs and petitions filed under Section 22A that contained allegations of blasphemy regarding the show. It was further requested to issue directives for consolidation of all the FIRs that might have been registered in various parts of the country and to restrain the law enforcing and investigating agencies from registering any new case, but to forward all pending and new FIRs containing allegations of blasphemy to the Supreme Court for eventual quashing of proceedings on them. It was also requested to order the relevant law enforcing agencies in all the provinces to take required steps for protection of the petitioners, management and staff of the Geo, Jang Group, along with their offices all over the country. The petitioner had made federal government through Interior secretary, chief secretaries of the four provincial governments and Chief Commissioner, Islamabad as respondents. On Monday, Muhammad Akram Sheikh, counsel for Independent Media Corporation explained to the court the whole background of the petition of 2010. What you want now”, Justice Jawwad asked him. The learned counsel replied that his client’s channels had been blocked in almost 90 percent areas of Pakistan and he wanted to revive the petition of 2010 and resumption of transmission of Geo TV channels. Meanwhile, the court while taking strong exception to objectionable banners and posters, displayed in various

avenues of the federal capital against the judiciary, directed Director Intelligence Bureau (IB) Aftab Sultan and Interior Secretary Shahid Khan to submit a comprehensive report on May 28, explaining as to who were responsible for this act. Those banners and posters were displayed in the federal capital after Justice Jawwad S Khawaja the other day declined to recuse from the bench hearing the petitions, filed by Independent Media Corporation against the negative campaign by other channels against Geo TV as well as revival of the 2010 petition. Meanwhile, DG IB Aftab Sultan appeared before the court and informed that he had been also victim of such things but he had often ignored it. Justice Jawwad S Khawaja said that he was the eyes and ears of the federal government so what he had done in this regard. The court asked him to submit a comprehensive report by May 28. The court also observed that thanks God only banners were displayed and bombs were not placed. Meanwhile, Mubashir Luqman when wanted to speak something, the court asked him that he had filed an application with the chief justice so when the chief justice gave any decision, the court would also hear him. During the hearing Interior Secretary Shahid Khan also appeared before the court and submitted that he had no information regarding the objectionable banners. The court however, observed that interior secretary was responsible for the internal security of the country.Interior secretary assured the court that he would look into the matter and submit report. Meanwhile, the court also ordered him to file a report before it by May 28.

Zardari to be on court’s radar till ISLAMABAD: Though accountability court reserved judgement for May 28, 2014 on an acquittal plea of Asif Ali Zardari regarding five corruption references, he is still on the court’s radar, reliable LHC probe finalisation sources told The Nation on Friday. Despite possibility of acquittal in five NAB corruption The Nation 24th May, 2014 references, the former president and co-chairperson of Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) would be on the court’s radar as two administrative inquiries initiated on the orders of the Lahore High Court (LHC) on complaints of alleged favourable decisions by the accountability judges in two separate cases are still pending against him. The outcome of these two inquiries carried out by an inspection committee would likely change the outcome of the cases. The LHC had formulated an inspection committee to review the judgements of two accountability judges. In this context the NAB prosecutor opposed the acquittal plea of the former president in five corruption references pending against him in the accountability courts. During the hearing of applications of Zardari for his acquittal in the corruption references on May 20, 2014, NAB Prosecutor Riaz Chaudhry submitted a letter of LHC before the accountability court which states that two administrative inquiries on decisions by different courts in corruption cases against Zardari are pending and requested for delaying the judgement till the LHC decides about the outcome of those inquiries. However, the counsel of Zardari opposed the move, terming it delaying tactics. The accountability court Islamabad had reserved the judgement for May 28, 2014 in these references after completion of arguments from both sides. Legal experts are of the opinion that the court should not declare judgement till finalisation of the administrative inquires of LHC in the cases against Zardari. An administrative inquiry in a court is tantamount to an intra-court appeal since the inquiry reviews the judgement. The decisions under administrative inquiry in the LHC are the same ones on which counsel for Zardari sought his client’s acquittal from the accountability court. However, much depends on what the LHC decides in its inquiry against two accountability court judges after an LHC inspection team had endorsed some reports that had exposed unbelievable but scandalous aspects of these corruption cases. In the cases of SGS and Cotecna, the two judges used similar words, expressions and even paragraphs to acquit all the influential co-accused.–Asif Bashir Chaudhry

No one to be allowed to ISLAMABAD: Justice Jawwad S Khawaja of the Supreme Court (SC) said on Thursday that it must be kept in mind by all that the judges of the higher judiciary would never allow anyone to undermine dignity of SC: undermine the dignity of the apex court. The SC took strong exception to a news channel and the Justice Jawwad Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) over a programme aired against the The News 23rd May, 2014 judiciary. A three-member bench of the apex court headed by Justice Jawwad S Khawaja and comprising Justice Gulzar Ahmed and Justice Mushir Alam heard the petition filed by the Independent Media Corporation (IMC) on behalf of Geo Network against the negative propaganda by other TV channels and for resumption of its transmission on cable networks. “It is learnt that the instant petition drew huge attraction”, Justice Jawwad S Khawaja asked Muhammad Akram Sheikh, counsel for Geo TV network at the start of the proceedings.Muhammad Akram Sheikh however, expressed his reservations saying that he felt harassed while taking up the case. “We are very professional and we will deal with it professionally and we do know what our values are, thanks to Allah Almighty,” Jawwad S Khawaja remarked adding that everyone should know that they would not let anyone cause harm to the dignity of the Supreme Court. Justice Jawwad S Khawaja refused to recuse himself from the bench hearing the Geo TV case saying a judge took the decision to disassociate himself in accordance with the Constitution. He said that it was the consciences of the judge himself which must determine his decision whether to sit on a bench or not. Justice Khawaja questioned the regulatory body about its presence during propaganda against the judiciary. He asked where Pemra was when propaganda was aired against the judiciary. He said “for God’s sake recognise right from wrong”. Zakir Malik, Pemra legal head, however, informed the court that they had forwarded the complaints to the department concerned after monitoring the said programme, adding he was hopeful of action being taken on it during the course of the day. The petitioner, the Independent Media Corporation (IMC) prayed to the court to issue directives to restrain all channels from airing allegations against other channels or media groups. The petition was filed against the backdrop of a smear campaign against the television network by rival media group’s kickstarted after a May 14 morning show aired a performance by some Qawwal. The petitioner prayed to the court to order the law enforcement and investigation agencies and lower courts all

over the country to submit copies of all the criminal complaints, FIRs and petitions filed under Section 22A that contained allegations of blasphemy regarding the show. It was further requested to issue directives for consolidation of all the FIRs that might have been registered in various parts of the country and to restrain the law enforcing and investigating agencies from registering any new case, but to forward all pending and new FIRs containing allegations of blasphemy before the Supreme Court for eventual quashing of proceedings on them. It was also requested to order the relevant law enforcing agencies in all the provinces to take required steps for protection of the petitioners, management and staff of the Geo, Jang Group, along with their offices all over the country. The petitioner made the federal government through secretary interior, chief secretaries of the four provincial governments and Chief Commissioner, Islamabad as respondents.Similarly, the Independent Media Corporation filed a Civil Miscellaneous Application (CMA) in the Constitutional Petition No 51 of 2010 for revival of the said petition. It was prayed to the apex court to order the revival of the titled constitutional petition in the interest of justice, equity and fair play; and may further be pleased to act strictly in accordance with the report of Javed Jabbar appointed as mediator with consent of the respondents in almost a similar episode and the mediation having been accepted by the respondents for reshuffling or blocking of the petitioner channels be restrained along with any other relief that the august court might graciously deem appropriate. During the hearing Justice Jawwad S Khawaja pointed out to Akram Sheikh, counsel for Geo Television, that there was an objection from some quarters in respect of the constitution/impartiality of the bench. Justice Jawwad S Khawaja said that the respondent or any other person having any objection against constitution of this bench might come to the court and the matter was adjourned to 1:00pm. Later at 1:00 pm, when the court resumed the matter Attorney General Salman Aslam Butt appeared before the court and submitted that the federation had no objection to the hearing of this petition by this bench which included Jawwad S Khawaja. However, one Sabir Shakir, Bureau Chief, ARY, Islamabad, appeared and stated that Mubashar Luqman who is an anchor person of ARY had sent him to state that he would like to engage a counsel in this case. The court observed that there might be justification for this request though, prima facie, it did not appear so but there appeared to be some TV talk show aired last evening which might need to be seen as it appeared to be relevant in this context. The court however, observed that in order to ensure absolute transparency in these cases, it was prepared to consider the objections which might appear from the aforesaid TV show to be against one member of this bench (Jawwad S Khawaja). “It is possible that this objection has something to do with the news programme ‘Kharra Sach’ which was aired on ARY on May 21, 2014 (Wednesday). Therefore, we direct the registrar of the court to obtain the CD of the said programme which was aired on Wednesday and which needed to be seen as the same might throw some light on the basis or otherwise of any objection as vehemently urged by Sabir Shakir”, the court ruled in its order. The court ruled that it would re-assemble at 2:00pm for the viewing of the TV programme. Meanwhile, the court directed its office to make arrangements for displaying relevant parts of the programme ‘Kharra Sach’ relayed the other day on ARY News Channel, through multimedia in court at 2:00pm. Meanwhile, as the court resumed the hearing at 2:00pm, it viewed the programme ‘Kharra Sach.’ The court viewed two relevant clips of the aforesaid programme in the court through multimedia. After viewing the relevant clips of the programme, the court observed that it was not for the present necessary to make any determination as to the nature of the excerpts from the TV programme. The court further observed if there was any cause or matter which might require intervention in exercise of proceedings under any constitutional or statutory provision, that matter, needless to say, would proceed separately because that had no direct nexus with the matter at hand. “The matter right now is as to whether one of us (Jawwad S Khawaja) should sit on this bench, the court ruled adding that the basis of the objection could be gathered from the second excerpt of the TV programme. The court noted that it was in this excerpt that it had been alleged that because of a relationship (Jawwad S Khawaja) had with owner of IMC, he should recuse from the hearing of this case. It was noted that the statement had been made by a gentleman named Aqeel Karim Dhedhi. The court however, ruled that it was quite obvious that he was totally unaware of the nature of the office of a judge and of the rules which had been laid down to ensure transparency and impartiality of benches hearing cases. “Mr Dhedhi appears to be unaware that although the IMC owner happens to be the brother of the wife of my brother, Justice Jawwad S Khawaja said adding that he did not recall the last time they met, it might have been 20 years ago, 16 years ago or perhaps at some ‘Shaadi or Ghami’ which he did not recall at present. “It is always for the judge himself to make a determination as to whether or not his relationship with any other person is such that he should not hear a particular case in which such person is a party”, the court ruled in its order. The court further ruled that the Code of Conduct prescribed by the Supreme Judicial Council for judges of the superior courts includes Article 4 which states that a judge should not “act in a case involving his own interest, including those of persons whom he regards and treats as near relatives or close friends.”From this it will be evident that only such persons can trigger recusal of a judge who are considered to be close by a judge”, the court ruled adding that the rationale of this stipulation is evident from its content. “It is clear that I have no basis for regarding or treating IMC owner as a near relative,” Justice Jawwad S Khawaja ruled in the court order. The oath of office of judges of the Supreme Court is set out in the Schedule to the Constitution as per Article 178. It is expressly stated therein that the judge “will not allow [his] personal interest to influence [his] official conduct or [his] official decision”. Judges also swear under the Constitution to “do right to all manner of people according to law without fear or favour, affection or ill-will”. The Holy Quran in fact directs judges to act fairly, justly and impartially even if they are hearing cases involving their own relatives. The above provisions of the Code of Conduct or oath of office or the verses from the Holy Quran do not impose a bar on a judge from hearing cases unless there is cause under Article 4 of the Code of Conduct reproduced above”, the court observed adding that

no such cause exists in this case. “In the present case, we may assume that the comments made by Mr Dhedhi may be in good faith, however, such comments before being aired on a TV channel licenced by Pemra could have been vetted or even in the case of a live telecast it should have been ascertained that the interviewee was aware of Article 19 of the Constitution and the law”, the court ruled in its order. The court however, ruled that it did not intend to embark on any such inquiry as this would be a matter within the competence and jurisdiction of Pemra. The court ruled that the Pemra should ensure that the provisions set out in Articles 19 and 19A of the Constitution are strictly adhered to. These provisions have also been incorporated in the Pemra Ordinance and the rules framed by Pemra thereunder and also in the provisions of the licences which are issued by Pemra to various channels, the court ruled. The court observed that it might be useful to record that all litigants at times made attempts to avoid hearing before certain benches but at times such attempts were not well intentioned. “There may even be attempts to intimidate or malign judges or institutions of the state and thereby, to undermine such individuals or institutions”, the court ruled.The court observed that the hearings of this case at intervals today was significant, adding that courts were not to succumb to any remark, defamatory or otherwise. “It is the conscience of the judge himself which must determine his decision to sit on a bench or not”, the court ruled. “We are very conscious and careful in noting that Mr Dhedhi may genuinely have felt the way he did when he said that one of us (Jawwad S Khawaja) should recuse from this case. Therefore, it might be for some other person or some other proceedings to deal with the utterances in the TV programme as reproduced above, the court ruled adding that they had no intention to comment on matters which were sub judice before this court and before other courts including accountability courts which are part of the judicial system of Pakistan wherein Mr Dhedhi might be arrayed as a party or as an accused. “We are deliberately and consciously not recording any remarks or comment lest it should cause prejudice to the trial or to Mr Dhedhi in such pending matters”, the court ruled. Justice Jawwad S Khawaja in the court order said that he did not find any reason whatsoever not to sit on this bench. He however referred to Article 19 of the Constitution which says, “Every citizen shall have the right to freedom of speech and expression, and there shall be freedom of the press, subject to any reasonable restrictions imposed by law in the interest of the glory of Islam or the integrity, security or defence of Pakistan or any part thereof, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, or in relation to contempt of court, [commission of] or incitement to an offence. The court ruled that barring the exclusions which had been mentioned in the said article, there could be no restriction imposed on the freedom of speech and expression set out in Article 19 of the Constitution.Meanwhile, the court adjourned the hearing till today (Friday).

Geo case: SC seeks reply from ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Thursday sought an answer from the federal government and the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) in relation to the petition filed by federal govt, Pemra the Geo TV network, DawnNews reported. A three-judge apex court bench, headed by Justice Dawn 22nd May, 2014 Jawwad S. Khawaja heard the case over Geo's petition requesting the court to halt what it termed a hate campaign and provocations against it. During the hearing Justice Khawaja said that if anyone had reservations regarding the constitution of the bench then they should inform the court. He added the federal government should inform in case there were any reservations against him or any other judge hearing the case. Upon which the Additional Attorney General Khawaja Ahmed Hussain said that he had no information about the issue. Geo’s attorney Akram Sheikh expressed his reservations saying that he felt harassed while taking up the case. The petition by the Independent Media Corporation that runs Geo TV had asked the court to issue directives to restrain all channels, including Geo, from airing allegations against other channels or media groups. The court had been requested to issue directives for consolidation of all FIRs that might have been registered in various parts of the country and to restrain the registration of any new case, but to forward all pending and new FIRs containing allegations of blasphemy before the SC for eventual quashing of proceedings on them. On May 16, the Pemra had served a show-cause notice on Geo Entertainment network for airing objectionable content in its morning show `Utho Jago Pakistan’ and sought immediate explanation from the channel.

Musharraf seeks re-framing of ISLAMABAD: Former president Pervez Musharraf on Wednesday requested the Special Court to charges in treason case re-frame the charge against him in the treason case as the old charge was framed without providing him all the necessary and relevant documents. The former president contended this The News 22nd May, 2014 while replying to the application moved by the prosecution on May 14, seeking to summon 10 witnesses for recording their statements. Musharraf prayed the court to dismiss the application of prosecution for being premature and misconceived. Through his counsel Barrister Farogh Nasim and Faisal Hussain Chaudhry, the former president contended that it is a procedural requirement of the law that the charge be re-framed in terms of Section 265-D as the old charge was framed without providing the accused with necessary and relevant documents. “The principle of procedural fairness also requires that the charge be re-framed and read out to the accused in light of the newdocuments/evidence which has been disclosed to the accused by virtue of this court’s order dated May 8, 2014,” the counsel for Musharaf contended, adding that the accused deserves to be treated in accordance with the law. They further submitted that the witnesses who have been named in the application in question are under the control of the complainant and the federation of Pakistan. Therefore, it is not necessary that summons be issued for them by this court, they said. The counsel submitted that no reason has been disclosed as to why summons should be issued to the individuals mentioned in the subject application, especially considering the fact that they have already been mentioned in the ‘list of witnesses’. They argued that it seems from the content of the application under consideration that perhaps the witnesses mentioned therein are not ready and willing to assist the complainant. “It is thus apparent that the application has been moved to force them to come before this court and give evidence against

their will and the application thus smacks of malafide,” they stated. They prayed that in the light of these reasons the instant application being pre-mature and misconceived is liable to be dismissed. It is pertinent to mention here that the Special Court on May 8, 2014 on the plea of Pervez Musharf ordered the prosecution team to deliver all the relevant materials pertaining to 3rd November 2007 acts to the accused.The prosecution on the court’s direction on May 14, provided Musharaf copies of all the material pertaining to the investigation conducted by FIA regarding 3rd of November 2007 emergency. The prosecution, however, submitted a list of witnesses, praying to summon them. Justice Faisal Arab ruled that first they will issue notice to the defence and then to the witnesses to appear before the court and adjourned the hearing till May 22.

People starving to death but ISLAMABAD: Justice Jawwad S Khawaja of the Supreme Court (SC) on Tuesday remarked the people are dying of hunger but nobody is out there to take care of them. He directed the federal nobody cares: SC and provincial governments to care for the poor. He observed that rodents are eating wheat but it The News 21st May, 2014 has become a forbidden tree for the poor. Heading a three-member bench of the apex court, hearing the Jamaat-e-Islami’s petition regarding an increase in flour prices, Justice Khawaja said, “The Supreme Court is neither the government nor does it want to run the government. However, the protection of fundamental rights of the people will be entertained at every cost.” He observed, “Years have gone and the poor are being dodged only on proposals. Wheat, atta and other food grains are being sent across the borders via Chaman by throwing dust into the eyes of the people.” He observed, “What should the poor do? Should they die? Wheat is rotting in godowns. Rodents are eating the wheat. And if wheat is a forbidden tree, it is only for the poor. Give up giving examples of international standard of life. Governments should take care of the poor people of their respective areas.” He remarked, “Should the poor go to Data Darbar or will the government provide them atta to eat? The government has to do what it has to do. We cannot legislate. The government of Punjab insists that its steps are revolutionary for the poor segments of the society. Then court questions: Have the people of Punjab become prosperous? We close the case for them (Punjab) if wheat and atta is available to the people of Punjab at subsidised rates. We will not issue directives. The Federation and the provinces should ensure provision of necessities of life to the poor people at low rates.” He continued: “The Jamaat-e- Islami is also present in the assembly. Why does it not raise voice for legislation by the government? The courts cannot do the entire job. If we have to do the entire job, then what duties are left for the governments?” He remarked, “Research is being conducted all over the world on food requirements but the situation prevailing here isthis that people are dying of hunger and no one is caring for them. We cannot remain silent after seeing people live hungry. Wheat is grown in Sindh as per their requirement. This is a major problem for KP and Balochistan.” He observed, “Price of wheat is fixed at Rs37.50 per kg in Punjab but 20-kg atta bag is available at the rate of Rs750 in Bahawalpur and at the rate of Rs1150 in Rawalpindi.” He observed, “We will not go into the matters of budget. Budget making is domain of assembly.” Sohail Khan adds: The SC ruled for safeguarding the fundamental rights of the people enshrined in Articles 9 and 38 of the Constitution and directed attorney general of Pakistan (AGP) to submit a comprehensive report pertaining to steps being taken for provision of sustainable nutrition to the vulnerable segment of society. “Whatever we can, we will do wherever people’s rights were not fully protected by the concerned authorities as enshrined in the constitution,” Justice Khawaja remarked.The court directed the attorney general to hold meeting with Secretary Ministry of National Food Security and Research and the law officers of the four provinces and evolve mechanism in the light of the research made by the staff of the apex court pertaining to the ways in which supply of flour could be ensured to the vulnerable segment of society. The research staff of the apex court department on the court direction submitted a report, containing example of other countries. The court directed that concrete steps be taken by the federation and four provincial governments for provision of sustainable nutrition to the vulnerable segment of society. The court also directed advocate general of Punjab to submit reply over the complaint made by the Khyber Pukhtunkhwa (KP) government accusing Punjab and other provinces of not allowing procurement and transportation of wheat to KP. The court directed the advocate general of Punjab to submit reply on May 28. Advocate General KP Abdul Latif Yousafzai filed a CMA in the petition of JI, stating that the province is facing serious difficulties as Punjab government has imposed unannounced restrictions for the last 20 days on the movement of wheat and established check posts on roads leading to KP for this purpose. He contended that these restrictions are blocking the flow of wheat to KP which is adversely affecting procurement drive and creating shortage of wheat in the market. He said it is causing increase in flour price at a time when all experts are unanimous that the country had bumper wheat crop this year and prices of wheat and flour are usually decreasing during. The KP government prayed to the apex court to issue directions to all provinces, especially Punjab, to allow procurement and transportation of wheat in KP. Earlier during the hearing, Additional Attorney General Attique Shah submitted before the court that fixation of prices for flour and its implementation was the major problem. He suggested that all the law officers of the provinces should deliberate upon the issue for the redressal of the problem. Justice Khawaja stressed that the federation is required to do the needful. He observed that a 20-kg bag of flour is being sold for Rs1150 in Rawalpindi. Razaq Mirza from Punjab submitted that flour is being available at a rate of Rs660 per bag in Punjab. Secretary Ministry of National Food Security and Research Seerat Asghar that they have replaced the ration card system with the grant of money on monthly basis, so that the people could by other commodities as well. The court observed that both the poor and the rich are paid subsidies, which meant for the poor. Justice Gulzar Ahmed observed that the state under Article 39 of the Constitution should ensure promotion of social and economic well-being of the people. The court adjourned the hearing till May 28.

Judiciary to step in where ISLAMABAD: Justice Jawwad S Khawaja remarked that the judiciary would interfere wherever the fundamental rights of the people were encroached upon.These remarks were made during people’s rights usurped: SC the course of the hearing into the Zahir Muzaffar missing person case. He said, “No compromise The News 20th May, 2014 will be made on the fundamental rights of citizens. Nothing will happen by sending letters by the government to the army and other intelligence agencies. We commend the performance of the intelligence agencies but the facts about those people who have been picked up by the intelligence agencies should come into the open.” The court disposed of the case of Zahir Muzaffar who had gone missing from Rawalpindi, remarking that it was not a case of enforced disappearance but was an ordinary case. The police should take action as per the law of the land. The court directed Additional Attorney General (AAG) Attique Shah to contact the military authorities, collect information in respect of Sultan Hussain, who had gone missing from Swat, and file a report before it by May, 27. During the course of the hearing of the Zahir Muzaffar missing person case, Amna Masood Janjua and officials appeared before the court.The Sultan Hussain Pappu case also came up for hearing. The Khyber Pakthtunkhwa (KP) law officer said that a joint investigation team was constituted in the light of the March, 21, 2010 directives of the commission on enforced disappearances. The case was registered in the light of the recommendations of this team. His brother had charged the armed forces in this regard. Then the matter was investigated and sent several letters. Justice Jawwad S Khawaja remarked, “We give no importance to these letters. There are agencies. We appreciate them. The matters should move ahead.Justice Gulzar remarked, “Is it not the case of military authorities.” Amna Janjua told the court that the name of Capt Riaz came up in this regard. Justice Jawwad remarked, “We issued orders in this case. Attique Shah said whatever order was issued by the court would be implemented. KP law officer said that the investigation by local police was underway. Military authorities were contacted repeatedly for seeking information but no response had been received from them. No headway had been made in the investigation of the case due to this attitude. The hearing of the case was adjourned till May, 27.

Court reinstates Zaka as PCB ISLAMABAD - Pakistani cricket turmoil deepened Saturday after Islamabad High Court (IHC) suspended a management committee appointed by the prime minister and reinstated Zaka chief Ashraf as chief of the cricket board. Pakistan's Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif had sacked Ashraf The Nation 18th May, 2014 on February 10 this year and appointed a committee chaired by Najam Sethi to oversee cricketing matters. The detailed court order, likely on Monday, will further clarify the bigger picture. Saturday's order meant all decisions taken by Sethi are now null and void -- including the appointments of head coach Waqar Younis and Zimbabwean batting coach Grant Flower. It is the third time Ashraf has been reinstated since May last year. Judge Noorul Haq Qureshi heard around 25 petitions from the employees of the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) who were sacked by Sethi, and read out his decision in the court. Ashraf's lawyer Karim Kundi said the court decided to revert to the situation of February 10. "The notification of February 10 has been struck down as null and void as it was illegal, and as natural consequences Ashraf and other board staff who were superseded by the order are reinstated," Kundi told AFP. "We were not the petitioner but we were made a party of various petitioners against Najam Sethi for termination of dozens of employees," Kundi said. "Wrapping up the various petitions judge suspended the SRO issued by PM on February 10. And natural legal interpretation suggests that Zaka Ashraf is back as chairman. I am not sure if there is any other interpretation but meanwhile this is the best understanding by the judge remarks." Ashraf hailed Saturday's decision. "This is a win for Pakistan cricket," Ashraf told Pakistani media. "I will try to correct the wrong things in Pakistan cricket and do whatever is good for Pakistan cricket." Sethi said he was waiting for the court's written orders. "I am waiting for the court's orders and it will be up to the government to appeal where they want," Sethi told a private TV channel. "The instability in the PCB is not good for cricket." On February 10, Sharif superseded Ashraf-led governing board and directed a management committee to pick a PCB chairman from among its eight members. The committee chose Najam Sethi, who has acted as interim chairman while Ashraf was suspended in 2013 by the same court. Sethi has been working as the PCB chairman, leading the eight-member adhoc management committee that, apart from Sethi, included Shahriyar Khan (former PCB chairman), Zaheer Abbas (former Pakistan captain), Naveed Akram Cheema (chief secretary, Punjab), Shakeel Sheikh (former member of PCB board of governors), Yousaf Naseem Khokhar (former member of PCB board of governors), Iqbal Qasim (former cricketer), Ijaz Chaudary (IPC secretary). Justice Noorul Haq N Qureshi, heading the single-member bench at IHC, was the judge hearing petitions against the PCB challenging the termination of a number of employees in the board, including that of former chief selector M Ilyas. Although Ashraf was not the petitioner, he was the aggrieved party with the February 10 order. Pakistan's Ministry of Inter Provincial Coordination, which oversees sporting matters in the country, is likely to challenge the decision next week. The same Islamabad court had suspended Ashraf in May last year, ruling his election "dubious". Sethi was appointed PCB chairman in June. Ashraf appealed against the decision and was reinstated on January 15 this year, before Sharif again sacked him a month later. The frequent changes have made Pakistan the laughing stock of international cricket. The Supreme Court earlier this year refrained from taking the case ahead, suggesting that the government has the authority to initiate changes within the PCB.

Expats who bring huge forex ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Friday observed that the overseas Pakistanis who bring billions of dollars foreign exchange to the country were maltreated at airports. Taking a strong maltreated at airports: SC exception to the poor handling of expatriates at the airports, the Supreme Court summoned the The News 17th May, 2014 chairman of the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA). A three-member bench of the apex court, headed

by Justice Jawwad S Khawaja, resumed hearing into a suo moto case pertaining to poor handling of the overseas Pakistanis at the airports. Justice Khawaja, during the hearing, remarked that the CAA was bent upon disgracing the expatriates at the airports. He said that the overseas Pakistanis were ambassadors of the country and their remittances were considered as the backbone of the country’s economy. This year their remittances would touch $15 billion, he said adding that the CAA officers draw salaries from these remittances. A representative of the CAA told the court that the authority was determined to provide maximum facilities to the expatriates and in this connection separate desks had been established for the overseas Pakistanis at all the airports to provide facilities to passengers. Justice Khawaja rejected the claim saying that no progress was made as he had witnessed the poor performance of the staff of the airports while going from Dubai to Lahore.Justice Khawaja further said that even the immigration forms were mostly in English, Turkish and French but not available in Urdu. He suggested that apart from Urdu, flight announcement at the airports should be made in regional languages. He observed that the Supreme Court took suo moto notice on the issue in 2010, hoping that the authorities concerned would look into the matter and take effective measures for improving the system at the airports. However, he said, the authorities concerned used to submit false reports before the court and had so far failed to take practical steps to facilitate the overseas Pakistanis by providing adequate facilities at the airports. Meanwhile, the court summoned the CAA chairman on the next date of hearing, with the direction to submit a comprehensive report on the measures being taken for providing adequate facilities to expatriates at the airports and adjourned the hearing for a week. The court had taken a suo moto notice of the plight of expatriates which was seen by Justice Jawwad S Khawaja at the Islamabad airport in June 2010.Justice Khawaja was in the baggage collection area of the airport when he saw the luggage of Pakistani expatriates arriving from Canada falling off the conveyer belt and the CAA staff taking no notice of the plight and complaints of passengers.

Magistrate shouldn’t be deemed ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court Judge, Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja, on Thursday said there should be some law to hand a military official over to military authorities and a magistrate should subordinate to army officer: SC not consider himself subordinate to a military commanding officer. Justice Khawaja gave this The News 16h May, 2014 observation while heading a three-member bench which resumed hearing into the case of 35 undeclared internees allegedly taken away by military officials from the Malakand Internment Center. In compliance with the court orders, Attorney General Salman Aslam Butt told the court that an FIR could be lodged against a serving army official according to the Pakistan Army Regulations. Justice Jawad S. Khawaja, however, remarked that there was no doubt that an FIR could be registered against a serving army man, but the question was that whether the case would be heard by a civil or military court. He further said if a magistrate hands a detained army official over to the military authorities, he should provide reasons for it. He further said even the military court should see whether in such cases, its decision could be judicially reviewed. Advocate General Khyber Pukhtunkhwa Abdul Latif Yousafzai replied that this issue could be taken care of under Section 374 of the Army Rules.Justice Gulzar Ahmed, another member of the bench, said if prisoners from the Malakand Internment Center had been sent for court martial, then it would be the initial stage. Meanwhile, the court directed the attorney general of Pakistan and advocate general KP to assist the court whether the ordinary or the military court was competent to hear the case of a serving army official. The court formulated three questions: When a serving army man commits an offence under the PPC, whether the civil or military court will conduct the trial; whether the ordinary courts are obliged to concede to the request of military authorities or it is its discretion to determine whether or not to accept the request of army authorities for the transfer of the case; what is the basis to consider/allow or decline such requests? Later, the court adjourned the hearing till May 26.The bench has been hearing the case since 5th August 2013 on various dates and also passed orders for their recovery, including Yasin Shah. The court also passed a judgment on December 10, 2013. Around 14 missing persons out of the total of 35 were produced before the court, but some of the remaining persons were said to be accounted for but were not produced before the court. Similarly, two of them have died. In March this year, the Malakand Police Station registered an FIR, on the behalf of Defence Minister Khawaja Asif, under Section 346 of PPC, against Naib Subedar Amanullah Baig and others for taking away 35 prisoners from the Malakand Internment Centre. The KPK police were directed to investigate the matter but on 25th March, a Dir magistrate was informed about the request from General Officer Commanding, Commander Operational Area, Swat, asking the magistrate to transfer Amanullah’s case to him. The deputy commissioner, who is also the commandant Malakand, complied with the request and consequently the case with the Malakand Levies was closed and documents of the case were forwarded to the military authorities on March 27, 2014.

For God’s sake, solve people’s ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Wednesday asked what kind of democracy it is that benefits were not being given to the masses. “For God’s sake, the federal and provincial problems: SC governments should solve the problems being faced by the masses,” it remarked. A three- The News 15th May, 2014 member apex court bench, led by Justice Jawwad S Khawaja, expressed these views during the course of hearing of petitions filed by different petitioners, including Abdul Hakim Khoso, on non- payment of royalty amounting to Rs600 billion in respect of 39 gas and oil wells in District Sanghar here on Wednesday. The Supreme Court sought a reply from the Federation and the provinces on implementation of its orders on payment of royalty to districts enriched with gas and oil resources and utilisation of royalty in the public interest. The court also directed the attorney general (AG) and all the four law officers to assist the court that if the Federation and provincial government did not implement the court orders, then what could be the outcome in the perspective of law and the Constitution and what order the court could issue. Justice Jawwad S

Khawaja remarked, “Money is lying in the pocket and we are wandering hither and thither with a begging bowl in our hands. We some time go to Europe and some time to the UK seeking help. Not extending the facility of water, grain and others to the people despite having funds is a cruel joke with them.” He further remarked, “What type of democracy it is that no benefit is being passed on to the people. I implore the federal and provincial governments in the name of Almighty Allah to please address the problems being faced by the people. On the one side, the royalty amount stands at Rs600 billion and, on the other side, the cycle of poverty and hunger from Tharparkar has extended to Cholistan.” He further observed, “Clean drinking water is not available for the people. Wheat and grain are not available. Roads are in disheveled condition. It is not the domain of courts to interfere in such matters. But we want their hard earned money is spent on the people. No one is realising it.” Justice Jawwad S Khawaja expressed grave concern over the absence of advocate general Punjab and advocate general Balochistan and on one occasion he was going to issue a show cause notice to both the law officers. But then the court directed them to appear before it in person. Justice Gulzar Ahmad remarked, “The government is playing a flute that all is ok and on the other hand basic necessities of life are not available to the people.”The petitioner told the court that four companies were working on 39 gas and oil wells in District Sanghar and royalty amounting to Rs600 billion was not being paid to the district. The court remarked, “We sought a reply from the Federation and the provinces in this respect. Why has it not been given so far?”The hearing of the case was adjourned till May 19.

Complainant should appear ISLAMABAD: Justice Faisal Arab of the Special Court hearing the treason case against former president General (retd) Pervez Musharraf remarked on Wednesday that the interior secretary, before court: Justice Arab being the complainant in the instant case, should first appear before the court to record his The News 15th May, 2014 statement or the complaint might stand vitiated. The three-member Special Court headed by Justice Faisal Arab and comprising Justice Tahira Safdar and Justice Yawar Ali, resumed hearing into the Federation’s complaint to initiate the high treason case against Pervez Musharraf for imposing the emergency rule in the country on Nov 3, 2007. In compliance with the court’s earlier order of May 8, Prosecutor Muhammad Akram Sheikh submitted before the court a 237-page report, containing the statement of 24 witnesses, including the then Punjab governor Khalid Maqbool and the then and incumbent Sindh Governor Ishratul Ebad stating that the prime minister and governors were not consulted before the proclamation of emergency on November 3, 2007. According to the report, former Cabinet Division secretary Masood Alam, in his statement, said no cabinet meeting was held on imposing emergency. Similarly, the former attorney general, Malik Qayyum, in his statement, said that Pervez Musharraf had not held any consultation with him on imposing the emergency rule. It is pertinent to mention here that on April 24, 2014, Prosecutor Muhammad Akram Sheikh told the court that no material was found in the Prime Minister’s House that could prove that the former prime minister Shaukat Aziz had advised the former president to impose emergency. He submitted that only Pervez Musharraf was responsible for the emergency rule. On Wednesday, in compliance with the court’s earlier order, the prosecution provided the court and defence team with copies of inquiry and investigation report, conducted by the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) on the actions taken on November 3, 2007. Musharraf’s lawyer Barrister Farogh Naseem had moved a plea, seeking copies of the FIA inquiry and investigation report on the actions taken on Nov 3, 2007. The court on May 8, after accepting the defence plea, directed the prosecution to deliver all the material relating to the investigation. After delivering the investigation report to the defence counsel in the court, Prosecutor Muhammad Akram Sheikh contended that all the witnesses who had given their statements in the report should be summoned for recording their statements. Justice Faisal Arab, however, remarked that as per the legal requirement, Interior Secretary Shahid Khan, being the complainant in the instant case, should first appear before the court for recording his statement, otherwise the complaint might stand vitiated. Shaukat Hayat, the counsel for Pervez Musharraf, also stressed that under Section 265f(1) of CrPC, the complainant must appear before the court first for recording his statement, otherwise the case could not be further proceeded. Muhammad Akram Sheikh later on submitted that the complainant, the interior secretary, would appear before the court on May 22. Similarly, the prosecutor submitted before the court a list of 10 witnesses, praying to summon them. The 10 witnesses included Siraj Ahmed, Khalid Rasool, Directors FIA Muhammad Khalid Qureshi, Additional Director General FIA and head of JIT, Maqsoodul Hassan, Director FIA and member JIT, Hussain Asghar, Director FIA and member JIT, Taj Umar Khan, Deputy Solicitor, Ministry of Law, Talib Hussain from the state-run TV, Kaleem Ahmed Shahzad, Section Officer, Cabinet Division, Najaf Kuli Mirza, Director FIA, Karachi, and Muhammad Yousaf, SSP Additional Director, FIA, Islamabad. Justice Faisal Arab, however, ruled that first they would issue a notice to the defence and then would issue notice to the witnesses to appear before the court and adjourned the hearing till May 22, 2014. Later, talking to the media, Faisal Hussain Chaudhry, counsel for Pervez Musharraf, said that hiding such a heavy material itself reflected the mala fide intention of the government.He said that pick and choose was evident as despite the FIA recommendation to incriminate the facilitators of Nov 3, 2007 acts, the government chose only Pervez Musharraf. “They will briefly analyse the material and reserve the right to raise objection to the case in future,” Faisal added.Muhammad Ikram Chaudhry, senior lawyer and member of the prosecution team, however, told ‘The News’ that no mala fide could be attributed to the investigating team or the prosecution.

Law permits case against army ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court (SC) on Wednesday observed that a case could be lodged against a serving army official as per the law and civil court was preferred for authority in this man: SC regard. It sought an explanation from the attorney general within 24 hours on the case of 35 The News 15th May, 2014 missing persons from an internment centre in Malakand.A three-member bench of the apex court, headed by Justice Jawwad S Khawaja, and heard the case. Justice Khawaja remarked that the

army issued orders like rulers and the DCO Malakand transferred the case to the military court. It was also said in the Abida Malik case that the case cannot be registered but later on it was registered, he remarked. He was of the opinion that everyone has the responsibility to implement the Constitution. Regarding the registration of a case against military personnel, Justice Jawwad said it will be decided after hearing the arguments of attorney general, adding that this issue has not been resolved since 1856 but now the court will resolve it. Advocate General Khyber Pakhtunkhwa also appeared before the court and informed it about the report submitted to the court that army requested that it will take action against its officer in the military court. DCO Malakand, passing orders on the same day, handed over the case to military and now the case is with the army. Latif Yousafzai on a question by the court said that the application of Defence Minister Khawaja Asif, copy of FIR and other documents were handed over to the military. He informed the court that army formally requested the civil administration, saying it will take action against Amanullah. Justice Jawwad said this was not the right order as they didn’t mention any reason of the incident. The court asked about the status of one-man commission in the case, adding that DCO didn’t use his brain while issuing order in the case. He also stated that the civil court has superiority and criminal court will deal with the case according to the law.Deputy Attorney General Waqas Dar informed the court they had collected the entire data on detention centre. The court adjourned the case till Thursday (Today).

Treason case: FIA report ISLAMABAD: The Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) on Wednesday presented the investigation report in the special court during the hearing of the treason case against the former military ruler presented in special court Gen (retd) Pervez Musharraf, DawnNews reported. The three-judge court, headed by Justice Dawn 14th May, 2014 Faisal Arab of the Sindh High Court, heard the case pertaining to treason charges against Musharraf. The abettors of the 2007 emergency decision as enlisted in the report, former Governor Punjab retired Lt-Gen Khalid Maqbool, Governor Sindh Ishratul Ibad, Sharifuddin Pirzada and former attorney general Malik Mohammad Qayyum, denied being accomplices to the alleged crime. The then secretary interior also expressed unawareness about any prior knowledge regarding the decision of the imposition of the Nov 3 emergency. The former attorney general Qayyum said that he did not have any prior information about the decision. The report said that no meeting of the cabinet was held on Nov 2, 2007. A one page application written by Joint Secretary Interior Chaudhry Mubarak was also presented along with the report. The FIA report comprising of 237 pages, contained statements of 24 witnesses on 97 pages. The report included summary of the testimonies on six pages and apart from statements it also had 125 documents attached with it. The court summoned the Interior Secretary Shahid Khan on May 20, saying that failure to do so could lead to ending of the case.

Law applicable to blasphemy of ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice Tassaduq Hussain Jillani on Tuesday observed that the blasphemy law was applicable to blasphemy of all religions. A three-member bench of the Supreme Court, all religions, says CJ headed by the chief justice and comprising Justice Azmat Saeed Sheikh and Justice Mushir The News 14th May, 2014 Alam, heard the sou moto case of bomb blasts at the All Saints Church, Peshawar, as well as other pleas seeking protection of worship places of minorities. Last year in September, twin explosions at the All Saints Church in Peshawar killed 80 people and wounded over 100.The apex court appointed three advocates as amicus curie (friends of court) for its assistance in chalking out comprehensive guidelines for the law enforcing agencies to provide security to the worship places of minorities across the country. The court directed the additional IG Sindh to submit a complete report over the recent wave of attacks on temples in the province within a week besides directing the advocate general of Punjab to submit a report in the first week of June over the issue of non-registration of marriages of the minority community. During the hearing, the CJ observed that desecration of worship places was an important issue, adding that articles 20 and 22 of the Constitution fully protected the rights of the minority community. “In our view, the promises made in these articles, the concerned authorities not much ensured protection of minorities rights as it should have been as guaranteed under the Constitution,” the CJ remarked. He said that in the light of these articles, the court will set guidelines for the law enforcing agencies so that they could ensure protection of worship places of minorities. In this respect, the chief justice said that they were going to appoint three advocates, Munir A Malik, Khwaja Haris and Hassan Aurangzeb, as amicus curie to assist the court on this important matter. The CJ, however, asked the concerned parties in the instant matter, including representatives of the minority community, to provide the court written suggestions for the protection of their worship places so that the court could address these issues. The CJ said the court will also examine if a special force may be deputed at the worship places or ordinary police so that they could be fully protected. During the proceedings, Ramesh Kumar, the representative of the Hindu community, informed the court about the recent wave of incidents in Sindh where temples were torched. He said in March, 2014, six incidents of desecration of Hindu temples occurred at Shikarpur, Larkana, Therparkar, Khairpur, Mithi, Hyderabad and the most recent on May 7 at Lee Market, Karachi. He said the authorities had not brought the miscreants to justice and no case was registered against them.The additional IG Sindh rejected the allegation saying that cases had been registered and they would submit a report before the court within a week. The court directed the IG Sindh to submit a complete report on the matter within a week. Salim Mikhel, another representative of the minority community, informed the court that the YMCA, an institute in Karachi, was in a bad condition and being run by an unauthorised authority. He said the matter had been pending with the Sindh High Court since 2005, which had appointed the Court Naazir to look after the institution. Additional Advocate General, Sindh, Mir Qasim Jath, expressed his regrets and assured the court that he will submit a report before the court within a week. Meanwhile, a representative of the Churches of Pakistan informed the court that the issue of non- registration of marriages of minorities still persisted. At this, the court issued a notice to the

advocate general Punjab with the direction to submit a reply by the first week of June and adjourned the hearing.

Sacrifices of those dying of ISLAMBAD: The Supreme Court observed on Tuesday that sacrifices of those dying of hunger will not be allowed to go waste as the Constitution calls for protection of life. Justice Jawwad S hunger won’t go waste: SC Khawaja remarked: “Have the federal and provincial governments decided that wheat will not be The News 14th May, 2014 provided to the poor people at subsidised rate no matter if they starve or rodents eat up the wheat?” He made these observations while heading a three-member bench of the Supreme Court (SC) that heard a suo moto notice on JI leader Liaquat Baloch’s petition against the increase in atta (flour) prices. Justice Khawaja remarked: “Long queues of trucks carrying bags of wheat and Urea fertilisers can be seen on the Chaman border. Wheat and atta can be smuggled to Iran and Afghanistan but cannot be made available to the poor who are starving. A woman threw her three children into a canal because of sheer poverty. Rulers should at least give atta to the people if vegetables and onions are not made available to them.” He observed: “The British kept on providing food and other items to the people 65 years back but we are providing food to somewhere else. It is not known if the orders come to us from Washington. This situation cannot be allowed to prevail any more. We are concerned with the fact that atta should reach thepeople.” He observed, “The government does not discharge its responsibilities. When we issue any order, then it is said that the court is overstepping its powers.” Addressing the additional attorney general (AAG), he remarked: “Read articles 9 and 14. As per these articles providing clothes and meeting other requirements of citizens is the responsibility of the government.” Justice Khawaja remarked: “We have to review if atta is being provided to the people as per the available resources or not.” He remarked, “If a bag of 20 kg atta is being sold out at the rate of Rs1, 150 in Rawalpindi, then what will be the situation in other areas? Atta is being smuggled to Iran and Afghanistan.” Secretary Food Security Seerat Asghar told the court there was no shortage of wheat in the country. Its distribution is the only issue. This is an administrative matter and the government can take measures on this count. He said it was not easy to address the problems being faced by 180 million people. Justice Khawaja remarked, “The government creates shortage of wheat deliberately to increase the prices.” The secretary food security said subsidy was a major issue. Billionaires are also using the subsidised ghee, he said. Justice Khawaja remarked, “Don’t tell us about the money. Tell us about the solution to this problem. Six months have elapsed and we have not reached any conclusion. We don’t know if there is subsidy or otherwise. Providing wheat and atta to the people is the responsibility of the government. This is not a political game but this is an issue of fundamental rights of the people. Basic necessities are not being made available to the people of an Islamic state. Do whatever you do but provide atta to the people as per their purchasing power. The people of Grade 20 are not facing the problem but it is a big problem for the people of Grade 1-7.” –Online Sohail Khan adds: The Ministry of National Food Security and Research admitted before the SC that due to the inadequate storage and distribution system of essential food items, vulnerable segments of the society were not receiving sustainable nutrition. Secretary Food Security Seerat Asghar presented this information before a three-member bench of the apex court.He acknowledged that although there was sufficient production of essential food items, the storage and distribution system was inadequate and as a result, vulnerable segments of the society were not receiving sustainable nutrition. The court asked the law officers present there to assist it what order could be passed in this case and the constitutional consequences of the failure of the government, if the constitutional requirement of the aforesaid provisions could not be met. “It must be shown to the court firstly that adequate steps have been taken to resolve the problem and to ensure delivery of essential food items to the poorer segments of the society at affordable prices. Secondly, it is for Executive Governments to ensure that the problem is resolved in a timely manner,” the court ruled in its order. The court recalled that four committees were constituted vide order dated April 14, 2014, one for each province, and reports on this issue had been submitted by these committees. “Although, these were tentative in nature and in fact in the Province of Balochistan, substantial areas were not accessible to the committee for Balochistan, we came to the tentative conclusion that the submissions made by the provinces that flour at affordable prices was available throughout the country might not be correct,” the court ruled in its order. “It is for the Executive Governments to make sure that the fundamental rights and relevant Constitutional Provisions such as articles 9, 14 and 38 are complied with,” it observed.The secretary food security submitted that there were ways to address these problems. He told the court that he will coordinate with the provincial governments and will submit a comprehensive report, which will set out the steps envisaged by these governments, the objectives to be achieved and the time-frame for it so that constitutional obligation imposed on the governments by inter alia articles 9, 14, 38 are fulfilled. The court recalled that Senator Malik M Rafique Rajwana was appointed as amicus curiae in this case and he had rendered some assistance to the court on the previous date of hearing. On Tuesday, he could not appear before the court for being part of an official delegation and he had gone out of the country.

Blasphemy case against JHANG: The Kotwali police have registered a First Information Report (FIR) under Section 295/A of the Pakistan Penal Code (blasphemy law) against eight nominated and 60 unknown members lawyers of the District Bar Association here on Monday. A couple of days ago, on the orders of the Kotwali Dawn 13th May,2014 district police officer, the police had registered a criminal case against Kotwali Station House Officer Umar Daraz, ASI Mubashir and five other policemen for thrashing and keeping a lawyer Aftab Nadeem in illegal detention. When the police did not arrest the nominated accused police officials, the DBA members went on strike till the arrest of the SHO and his subordinates. On the third day of the lawyers’ protest Arshad Mahmood, a resident of Basti Attawali, Jhang Sadar, through an application informed the police that during the protest some lawyers had shouted

slogans with the name of SHO Umar Daraz and the mention of the name Umar had hurt the applicant’s religious emotions. The Kotwali police lodged an FIR (No 294/14) against eight nominated and 60 unnamed lawyers under Section 295/A of the PPC. Sources said it was an exceptional FIR in which the lawyers who were protesting against the police highhandedness were booked under blasphemy law. The issue would be taken up by Punjab and Pakistan Bar Councils. Some DBA members alleged SHO Rana Umer Daraz belonged to Faisalabad and was a relative of a prominent Punjab minister. They alleged the police registered the case against the lawyers as a counter to the FIR against the SHO.

LHC returns Ayaz Sadiq’s LAHORE - Expressing dismay over the disturbance created by PTI workers in the Lahore High Court on the appearance of their leader Imran Khan, Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial referred the appeal to ECP appeal of National Assembly Speaker Sardar Ayaz Sadiq to ECP against its verdict over an The Nation 13th May, 2014 alleged rigging in NA-122. Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial referred the matter to the Election Commission of Pakistan to decide it on its own. In the order, the CJ observed that in the light of several judgments of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the authority, autonomy, independence and sanctity of Election Commission of Pakistan is upheld. Referring to the decision of the Election Commission of Pakistan on June 18 last year, the CJ held that the results can be inspected while the petitioner, Sardar Ayaz Sadiq, is also not opposed to it. He, however, said any officer of the federal government or provincial government can be assigned by the Election Commission of Pakistan in coonection with inspection of the election record. The CJ said if the Election Commission declined to depute some officer from the Punjab government or the federal government; it should consult the judiciary before appointing any judicial officer for this purpose. The CJ remarked that the judiciary had accepted a special request of ECP and deputed its officers for holding the general election 2013; otherwise it had nothing to do with it. The judicial officers, he remarked, were already overburdened by their judicial work and had no time for election matters. He said only in Punjab, 2.2 million cases were being taken up per year. Earlier, the CJ asked Ahmad Owais, counsel for Imran Khan, about his written statement. The respondent’s counsel read out the statement which stated that on that day lawyers of the PTI entered the courtroom peacefully, keeping in mind the decorum of the court. He said the PTI always wanted rule of law and independence of judiciary. The CJ asked the counsel if the statement had been signed by Imran Khan himself. The counsel said he had the authority to sign his statement. The CJ asked Owais if Imran was sorry over the incident. He replied, of course, he was regretful. The CJ repeatedly asked him the same question. He said the PTI workers should have controlled their emotions as it was the court of law and emotions did not work here. Imran Khan had approached the ECP for inspection of the polling record after he lost to Sadiq in NA- 122. Sardar Ayaz Sadiq had challenged the orders of the commission on his appeal.

LHC CJ stresses need for SIALKOT: Lahore High Court Chief Justice Umer Ata Bandial has stressed the need for strengthening national institutions through ensuring the rule of law and bringing betterment in the strengthening institutions judicial system for dispensing justice to the marginalised sections of society. He stated this while Dawn 11th May, 2014 addressing a lawyers’ convention here on Saturday after administering oath to the newly-elected office-bearers of the district bar association (DBA). LHC judges Justice Yawar Ali, Justice Mehmood Ahmed Bhatti, Justice Shujaat Ali Khan, DBA President Advocate Shahid Mir, District and Sessions Judge Shahid Rafeeq, ADSJs and senior civil judges from Sialkot, Daska, Gujrat, Narowal and Gujranwala districts were also present. He said the institutions could only be strengthened by ensuring the implementation of the Constitution and law.He said the rule of law was a must for national development, prosperity, peace and justice. He stressed the need for making all-out sincere efforts to provide better working atmosphere in courts to dispense speedy justice. He also vowed to ensure merit while dispensing justice. The chief justice said all the negative thoughts about the rule of law in Pakistan had now ended due to the effective role of lawyers and the judiciary in the country. “We have to uphold the prestige of the judiciary, besides, strengthening national institutions to provide justice and ensure the rule of law,” he said. Later, addressing a lawyers’ meeting at Daska Bar Association, the chief justice said it was the need of the hour to promote good working relationship between the bar and the bench for providing speedy justice to masses. He said the lawyers’ community should play its pivotal role in ensuring smooth provision of justice and removing all the hurdles in the way. He urged the lawyers to uphold the sanctity of their profession. The chief justice inaugurated the newly-established bar room and a library at Daska Bar Association.

Court summons Musharraf in ISLAMABAD: An anti-terrorism court (ATC) has summoned former president Pervez Musharraf on May 23 in the judges detention case.ATC Judge Atiqur Rehman resumed hearing in the case judges’ detention case on Friday. Musharraf’s counsel furnished an application with the judge seeking an exemption for The News 10th May, 2014 his client from the Friday’s court appearance. It was submitted in the application that the former military ruler was in Karachi and was unable to travel to Islamabad due to severe backache. The prosecution lawyer, Amir Nadeem Tabish, opposed leniency for the accused; however, the court accepted the application and ordered that the former president be produced on the next hearing on May 23, saying that if Pervez Musharraf failed to appear before the court on the next hearing, action will be taken against his guarantors.Musharraf is nowadays in Karachi. He arrived in the city from Islamabad last month to undergo some diagnostic tests at the PNS Shifa.

Musharraf ordered to appear for ISLAMABAD: The anti-terrorism court in the federal capital which has been hearing the judges' detention case granted exemption to former military ruler Gen (r) Pervez Musharraf for appearing next judges' detention hearing during today's hearing and ordered the former president to turn up at the next hearing of the Dawn 9th May, 2014 case, DawnNews reported. The request for Musharraf's exemption submitted in the anti-terror court said the former president was suffering from a pain in the backbone due to which he could

not appear in court today. While granting the former president exemption from today's appearance, the ATC warned of strict action against Musharraf's guarantors in case he fails to show up for the next hearing of the case. The court subsequently adjourned the hearing of the case to May 23. The judges' detention case is based on an FIR registered in August 2009 against the retired general on the complaint of Chaudhry Mohammad Aslam Ghumman advocate. Ghumman had asked the police to initiate legal proceedings against Musharraf for detaining over 60 judges, including then chief justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry after proclamation of a state of emergency in the country on Nov 3, 2007. Ever since his return to Pakistan prior to the May 2013 general elections, Musharraf has been facing a barrage of high-profile cases, including the Bugti murder case and the Benazir Bhutto murder case. The federal government in Nov 2013 decided to try Musharraf under Article 6 of the Constitution and a special court was set up in the federal capital city in this regard. He was indicted for treason on Mar 31 this year but pleaded not guilty to the charges read out against him. He later shifted to Karachi where he has been staying since April 20, 2014 and has been undergoing treatment for his medical ailments.

Courts reject petitions against ISLAMABAD/FAISALABAD/MITHI: The court of law on Wednesday rejected petitions against Geo/Jang Group at three different places in the country. The honourable courts in Islamabad, Geo, Jang Group Faisalabad and Mithi took up different applications, seeking banning of Geo TV and trial of its The News 8th May, 2014 authorities. Justice Riaz Ahmad Khan of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) here on Thursday dismissed two petitions seeking the registration of an FIR and trial under Article 6 of Geo TV authorities.The IHC sustained office objections over the petition that had been raised earlier by the IHC’s registrar. The Registrar’sOffice had raised objections that the high court is not a relevant forum and such petitions could not be filed directly with this court. Two petitioner Qamar Abbas and Abdur Rehman on Tuesday filed these petitions while adopting that they filed applications before Kohsar Police Station for registration of FIR against Geo TV for allegedly maligning armed forces and ISI but the police did not entertain them. The petitioners had been seeking from the court to order police to register FIR against Geo TV and also issue directives that a case be registered against the TV channel under Article 6 on treason charges. Legal counsel for the petitioners argued before the court regarding office objections. The court however dismissed their applications sustaining the objections. In Faisalabad, Additional District and Sessions Judge (ADSJ) Manzar Ali Gill, meanwhile, dismissed an application for the registration of a case against the Geo News administration and Amir Mir. A local lawyer had filed the application with the ADSJ for the registration of the case on April 29. The ADSJ, in his written order, said as the matter was being heard by a judicial commission, it could not be heart by this court. Meanwhile, Mithi Senior Civil Judge Mian Fayyaz Rabbani rejected another application filed against the Geo and Jang Group. The court was moved by a local resident - Din Raj - who sought banning the Geo and Jang Group. The judge, in his verdict, said the applicant did not have any proof; therefore, there was no room in the law to initiate a trial. In case, allegations were levelled against the ISI, it should seek a trial itself. The law did not allow a common citizen to become a petitioner when the allegations were levelled against a national institution. He also asked the applicant to file his complaint against the Geo and Jang Group with Pemra.

Charged PTI supporters smash LAHORE: Overcharged Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf activists — in the presence of their leader Imran Khan — resorted to rowdyism in the court of the Lahore High Court chief justice on LHC CJ’s court door Wednesday by scuffling with security personnel, breaking the courtroom door and shouting The News 8th May, 2014 slogans. LHC Chief Justice Umer Ata Bandial left the courtroom in annoyance, halting the hearing for a couple of hours. He took note of the PTI supporters’ scuffle with security personnel deployed outside the courtroom, asking Imran Khan to state his position in writing about ‘disturbing’ the decorum and tranquillity of the court by his supporters. The incident took place when the PTI chief Imran Khan reached the honourable court to attend the proceedings of a petition filed by the National Assembly Speaker Sardar Ayaz Sadiq against an order of the Election Commission about the inspection of ballots in the NA-122, Lahore. The PTI chief had obtained an impugned order from the ECP after losing the election against Sardar Ayaz Sadiq. A large number of PTI workers were already present on the LHC premises before the arrival of their leader. They followed him into the courtroom shouting slogans. At the entrance of the courtroom, a stampede took place due to the narrow entrance and their over-enthusiasm. As the security staff tried to stop the PTI supporters and later closed the door, they started thumping at the door and broke a portion of it. Seeing this, the CJ left the courtroom where he was holding proceedings of some other case, asking Advocate Ahmad Awais, the counsel for Khan, to meet him in his chamber. The counsel in the chamber regretted the behaviour of overcharged PTI supporters who had forcibly entered the courtroom.The chief justice asked the counsel to advise his client to leave the courtroom to disperse his supporters. Later, Imran and his supporters left the court premises and the chief justice resumed the hearing after two hours. Taking note of the upheaval, Justice Bandial observed that attending the courts of law required respect, patience and tolerance from all attendees. He said precautions must be taken by persons with political following and it was their duty to control irresponsible behaviour of their supporters. He observed that the court was showing restraint and did not intend to issue a contempt notice to the respondent (Imran Khan). He remarked that the president of Pakistan was represented before this court in a dignified manner and obeyed its order too. “The brash conduct by fervent supporters in the present case should have been anticipated and prevented,” the chief justice said and directed Imran’s counsel to submit a written explanation on behalf of his client to state his position on the incident. The chief justice adjourned the hearing till May 12 and observed that the court would first see the explanation to be submitted by the respondent and then decide about the fate of the main case. Ayaz Sadiq, in his petition, had challenged the order of the Election Commission to the returning officer to let his opponent candidate Imran Khan in NA-122 inspect the election record. He said

the returning officers were not answerable to the Election Commission and, therefore, they could not be directed by the Election Commission after the elections. Imran Khan had approached the ECP for the inspection of the polling record after he lost the election from NA-122 against Ayaz. The commission had passed the impugned order on his appeal.

PHC to govt: free those detained PESHAWAR: Chief Justice of Peshawar High Court (PHC) Mazhar Alam Miankhel observed on Tuesday that the government should release the missing persons who had been shifted to the without evidence internment centres if there was no evidence about their involvement in terrorist activities. “The The News 7th May, 2014 government should bring the arrested missing persons shifted to internment centres to the trial courts for prosecution if they were involved in terrorist activities. The innocent detainees should be freed,” he said while hearing the cases of the missing persons. A division bench comprising the chief justice and Justice Ikramullah Khan asked the representatives of defence and interior ministries to inform the families of missing persons where their near and dear ones had been kept if they were alive. The bench issued a show-cause notice to the secretary of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Home and Tribal Affairs Department after deputy secretary Usman Khan failed to produce progress report in the cases of missing persons shifted to internment centres. He informed the bench that ground check for the whereabouts of the missing persons was in progress. To this, the bench expressed concern and asked the deputy secretary to leave the court at once. Giving the last chance to the ministries of defence and interior, the bench asked them to submit replies in the cases of 12 missing persons on affidavit before the next hearing or else the court would pass strict order in these cases. During the course of hearing, an aged woman alleged that her son was picked up by the police and personnel of the spy agencies a few months ago. Hazrat Bibi, a resident of Harif Khan Killay in Chota Lahor tehsil in Swabi district, claimed she was informed on October 10, 2013 that four persons two in police uniform and two in civvies came in a car and seized her son at a bus stand in Akora Khattak in Nowshera and took him to an unknown place. She stated her son Muhammad Irshad was a grade 8 student at a seminary in Akora Khattak. She said her son was innocent and he was not involved in any anti- state activity.In another case, a lawyer informed the court that one Shamsher Ali had filed a habeas corpus petition seeking the recovery of his two sons, but later he also went missing. PESHAWAR: In a detailed judgment on the high court’s jurisdiction in the tribal areas, the Venturing into tribal areas : Peshawar High Court (PHC) has observed that denial of fundamental rights of tribesmen, which Detailed judgment outlines PHC are available to other citizens, has caused the tribal areas to become the most dangerous region. jurisdiction in FATA A five-member bench headed by former chief justice Mian Fasihul Mulk, Justice Mazhar Alam th Miankhel, Justice Yahya Afridi, Justice Qaiser Rashid Khan and Justice Malik Manzoor Hussain Express Tribune 6 May, 2014 on April 7 had announced the short order, advising Parliament to make amendments in Article 247 (7) of the Constitution. The Article reads that, “neither the Supreme Court nor a high court shall exercise any jurisdiction under the Constitution in relation to a tribal area, unless Majlis-e- Shoora (Parliament) by law otherwise provides.” On March 11, the bench put forward seven basic questions before a panel of senior lawyers, asking them to assist the court to decide if it was in its jurisdiction to hear cases from the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata). The points included the court’s authority in hearing cases of employees of the federal and provincial governments working in the tribal areas as well as cases of DMG and service commission officials and employees exclusively recruited for tribal areas. Moreover, the bench had questioned whether the high court can entertain cases regarding illegal detention of tribal residents, appeals against decisions of the FATA Tribunal, including both civil and criminal cases, and how to proceed if the cause of an action is in the settled areas but the incident occurs in tribal areas. The court states in its order that there is no regulatory mechanism to check the misuse of power by political agents which often results in serious human rights violations. The political agent makes a decision regarding conviction or acquittal and is not bound by recommendation of relevant tribal jirgas. The political agent’s order cannot be challenged before the high court. “We are, therefore, of the view that all employees of FATA Secretariat, its line department and subordinate offices are civil servants, whether on deputation from the provincial government or appointed by the federal government either on a temporary or permanent basis, and the bar contained in Article 247 would not apply to those government servants merely by their posting in the tribal areas,” reads the 46-page order, with a 23-page additional note by Justice Afridi. It further states that if a person is illegally removed from a settled area to the tribal territory by political authorities, the court can entertain the matter, if the procedure laid down in Section 86-A of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, has not been fulfilled. “If the cause of action has occurred in the settled area but the proceedings have been carried out by the political authority within Fata, then this court has the jurisdiction to entertain the matter,” the order explains. Moreover, if a person belonging to the settled areas is arrested within the territorial limits of this court and then moved to the tribal areas without fulfillment of the necessary legal requirements, this court may exercise constitutional jurisdiction in the matter, the court explained. Similarly, on contractual obligations between government functionaries and private persons in the tribal areas, cases could be entertained by ordinary courts of the province, PHC stated. PHC was hearing around 60 petitions in which petitioners want the Frontier Crimes Regulation abolished, extension of jurisdiction of high court to tribal areas, restraining members of the FATA Tribunal and to abolish other laws which are against fundamental rights. FIR order against journalists ISLAMABAD: The unanimous opinion of legal experts is that the additional sessions judge and the Justice of Peace Islamabad, who passed an order under section 22-A Cr.PC to register an unlawful FIR against journalists under the treason and terrorism acts, is unlawful and the JP didn’t fulfil the The News 5th May, 2014 requirements of the law. The JP has transgressed his authority by passing an order in the absence of an application moved to the police for lodging an FIR, criminal law experts spoke out when contacted by this correspondent. Renowned criminal lawyer, Rizwan Abbasi when

contacted, said, “The JP crossed his limits.”He said section 22-A, B of the Cr.PC provides remedy for aggrieved person in case there is some excess of the police authorities or the police refuse to lodge an FIR after receipt of information of a commission of a cognisable offence. When the application has not been submitted before the police, how the Justice of Peace can be approached, he asked. The JP, in his order, indicated that the complainant didn’t approach the area police first and directly submitted a petition before the JP, he said. “Comments were sought from the SHO Margalla, who reported that no such application has been submitted by the petitioner as well as that the incident took place in another part of the country, so there is no jurisdiction to register an FIR,” the JP wrote in his order. Rizwan Abbasi said the courts should not play the role of SHO, adding that in genuine cases, if someone directly approaches the Justice of Peace and claims that the police are reluctant to entertain/receive an application, he (the JP) can only direct the police to receive the application but in any eventuality, normal process cannot be bypassed. One should approach the police first and on the non-cooperation of police, one can knock at the door of the Justice of Peace. If someone approaches the police for the registration of an FIR and feels aggrieved because of police conduct, when he approaches the Justice of Peace, he (the JP) can only see whether the information of the commission of a cognisable offence has been conveyed to the police. If yes, what is the reason for the inaction of the police, Abbasi said, adding that the JP cannot go into the correctness or falseness of allegations. Secondly, he cannot direct the police under a particular provision of law, and even the JP cannot add any section of the law. In PLD 2005, Lahore page 470, titled Khizar Hayat and others vs IGP Lahore and others, Head Note-X, says, the JP cannot add or delete any section, overall in charge of a criminal case is area magistrate, who during the investigation gets many opportunities to go through the record of investigation and in appropriate cases and at an appropriate stage, he can require the IO to consider or delete any penal provision, he maintained. Rizwan Abbasi said, in the present case, the JP declared the offence as a terrorist act when the application was not given to the police which is on record. He said, in the present era, every citizen of Pakistan or even a citizen of the global society can easily understand terrorism which explodes in markets and kills hundreds of people. How cans freedom of expression can be termed as a terrorist act”. Terrorism is defined in section 6 of the ATA 1997, which is divided into two parts, Part-1 defines Mensrea, Part-2 elaborates Actusrea. If someone takes an action defined in sub section 2 of section 6 of ATA with the intention defined in clause 1 of section 6, then it can be termed as an act of terrorism. In an order dated 3-5-2014, the JP has discussed only Part-1 of the above said section and not mentioned which action has been taken by the proposed accused due to which he declared it an act of terrorism, Rizwan said. However, on the other side, when journalists are being declared terrorists and traitors, article-19 of the Constitution protects freedom of speech, freedom of expression and freedom of press, he concluded. Renowned lawyer Athar Minallah, when contacted, said the court (JP) should not exercise such power in these circumstances when high courts have dismissed the same kinds of petitions. “I haven’t heard such orders in my career,” Minallah said. Many prominent lawyers of the federal capital, including Malik Nasir, Advocate, Mohammad Mansoor, Advocate, Muhammad Arif, Advocate, Ziaur Rehman, Advocate Muhammad Imran, Advocate Rizwan Bagri and Muhammad Akhter Cheema Advocate expressed the same point of view about the biased order of the JP. It is to be mentioned here that Additional Sessions Judge-VIII, /Judge of Peace (West) Islamabad, earlier accepting the petition filed by Arshad Mehmood Butt, son of Fazal Karim Butt, resident of Mustafa Apartments, Markaz G-8, Islamabad, ordered to lodge an FIR against journalists under the terrorism act. Monitoring Desk adds: Eminent lawyer Jam Asif Mehmood said the orders to register an FIR against journalists have been issued by the Justice of Peace, and not the judiciary. He clarified that the Justice of Peace is not part of the judiciary. He said the order was issued on the complaint of a person who is not an aggrieved party.

Court orders Musharraf to ISLAMABAD: The additional district and sessions judge while accepting Pervez Musharraf’s plea nd for a one-day exemption from appearing before it directed him to ensure his presence in the court ensure his presence on 22 on May 22 in a Abdul Rashid Ghazi murder case. The Ghazi Rashid murder case came up for The News 4th May, 2014 hearing in the court of Additional District and Sessions Judge Wajid Ali here on Saturday. Maj (retd) Akhtar Shah, counsel for the former president, appeared in the court. Three petitions seeking the acquittal of the former president, his exemption from attendance on Saturday and his permanent exemption were filed in the court. The counsel took the plea in the court that producing Pervez Musharraf in the court was the responsibility of the prosecution and he would appear today if court said so. “Security be provided to Pervez Musharraf as he is ready to face all the cases. If any harm is caused to Musharraf, its responsibility will rest with the petitioner”, Musharraf’s counsel said. Abdul Haq, counsel for the petitioner, said one and the same stance was being adopted in every petition that Pervez Musharraf was facing security threats and he had been facing health problems for quite some time. He prayed to the court to summon Pervez Musharraf and if he did not appear, his guarantors be summoned. The court, while accepting the plea for granting exemption for one day to Pervez Musharraf, issued notices to the parties concerned on the petitions seeking acquittal and permanent exemption for the former president. The judge remarked that exemption had been granted for today as the former president was not present in the city. No excuse will be accepted on the next hearing; therefore, his attendance must be ensured.

SHC, BHC reject petitions for HYDERABAD: The Hyderabad circuit bench of the Sindh High Court (SHC) and the Balochistan High Court (BHC) after initial hearings on Wednesday rejected the pleas against the alleged banning Geo media campaign by the Geo and Jang Group following the attack on the Geo News anchorperson The News 1st May, 2014 Hamid Mir. The benched declined to hear the petitions, saying the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) had already taken notice of the issue. Syed Muhammad Ameen

Shah Rashidi, a resident of the Citizen Colony, had lodged a petition with the SHC naming the federal government through the secretary information, Pemra chairman, federal law secretary and MD Jang and Geo Group and claimed that on April 19, 2014 following the attack on the renowned journalist and anchorperson Hamid Mir in Karachi, the news of the incident spread around the globe through the local as well as the international media but the Geo, Jang Group and The News, on the occasion, allegedly tried to create a confrontation between the institutions of the state through their media campaign. The democratic structure of the country was put on stake as the security institutions and their departments were attacked in the campaign, it added. The applicant had also requested that the Geo and Jang Group be stopped from their media campaigning against the national defence institutions. It requested the court to order the media group to report as per the Pemra rules, adding that the federal government and the secretary information be directed that a spokesperson should be appointed for issuing the government’s reaction on the controversial issues. It also requested the court that Pemra should be ordered to regulate the performance of the TV channel and to issue a show-cause notice in case of violation of rules.The division bench comprising Justice Syed Hasan Raza Rizvi and Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar after hearing the explanations of Muhammad Khoso, lawyer of the petitioner, said in verdict that Pemera had already issued a show-cause notice after taking notice of the issue, therefore, the petition could not be heard. Earlier, Balochistan High Court (BHC) rejected a constitutional petition for banning Geo TV.Constitutional petition was filed by the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf leader Naeem Tareen.A divisional bench of the BHC, comprising Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa and Justice Kamran Mulakhel, rejected the petition stating that petitioner was not the government and he should have approached Pemra instead of this court.

Have institutions become ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court (SC) on Wednesday observed that the missing persons were not being traced; questioning had the institutions become helpless? It ordered the recovery of helpless, asks SC Hassan Abdullah and Khalid Khalil within 15 days. A two-member bench of the SC, led by Chief The News 1st May, 2014 Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Tassaduq Hussain Jillani, took up the case for hearing. Justice Azmat Saeed, expressing annoyance to Additional Advocate General (AAG) Razzaq A Mirza and police authorities, remarked: “Have all institutions issued any mutual notification that they will never to speak the truth in the court? Have they all become so insensitive that whereabouts of missing persons are not being located?” He further observed: “People were taken away from under your nose and you could not come to know about them. Pain is felt by one whose near and dear one is lost.” The court expressed wonder that no outcome was made despite the fact that so many witnesses of the incident were there. Munir Bhatti, counsel for the petitioner, told the court: “We sent applications to all the forces as soon as this incident occurred but to no avail.” A law officer told the court that the matter was pending before the commission on enforced disappearances. The statement of one witness has been recorded but the commission has given no finding on it so far, he said. The court gave 15 days to the AAG for the recovery of these two missing persons and adjourned the hearing.

HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION IN LEGAL SECTOR

Women Trafficking in KPK The custom of bride-price has become a great source of exploitation by the traffickers in KPK. Woman’s sale in the name of marriage is a norm in the rural and urban areas, particularly in the Noor Education Trust th tribal belt bordering KPK. The custom is prevalent in KPK, FATA, and parts of Balochistan. In 26 May, 2014 NWFP, the practice is more pronounced in the northern and southern regions of the province. But the involvement of the gangs in the form of the intermediaries (marriage-brokers) has led the practice to spread to the central districts of the province as well. Previously, it used to be the northern district of Chitral that would figure prominently in the trafficking business, but, of late, cases from other areas of the province proved that the outreach of the gangs involved in the business continues to expand to more areas. In the Northern belt of the KPK, gangs exploit the practice in Chitral, Swat, Malakand and Dir. The affected central districts are Mardan, Swabi, Nowshera, Charsadda andPeshawar. Another area fertile for the business is the southern belt of KPK – Bannu, Karak and the tribal area of North andSouth Waziristan. Girls are even being trafficked from KPK to Afghanistan. Though trafficking practice is going on in all parts of the province, yet four districts –Peshawar, Nowshera, Mardan and Swabi are serving as the main market and hub for the traffickers. The supply is made from these trading centers as hubs are established here. All aspiring clients come to these districts to explore agents who can help them in the trade by supplying the merchandize—girls. The local brokers receive demands in these districts.Peshawar serves as the central trading market and transit route. Women, girls and children trafficked to external markets such as the Middle Eastern countries; brokers also exploit these local markets for the trade. There are various reasons for the practice, but poverty is the underlying factor. Apart from the poor condition of the people, a greater number of girl child communities facilitate the gangs to resort to women trafficking under the guise of marriages. This poverty, combined with the practice of the bride price, unwittingly makes the community vulnerable to this violation. The families think they are giving away their daughters and sisters in marriage, while, on the contrary, the people involved in the business, mostly fromPunjab, exploit the tradition of bride price to gain undue benefits. They are ready to pay a higher bride price than the local people. Therefore, the poor fall an easy prey to the practice. Based on the findings of this study, most women, for whom the bride price is paid, are in fact unduly exploited in many ways. This involves sexual abuse, prostitution or usage as agricultural labor. Girls who survive this ordeal are not even sure whether their families would accept them back or not. Those who are not accepted, end up in shelter homes. Interaction with several of these victims shows the involvement of gangs in these kinds of practices.

THE SECURITY OF JUDICIAL TENURE Published on: May 14th, 2014 The News

Since 1973, the unwanted practice of appointing additional judge or a permanent judge. There are a number of drawbacks judges in high courts “for such a period as determined by the in continuing with the existing practice. First, an additional judge President, not exceeding the period prescribed by law” is would not be in a position to perform his duties as continuing unabated. This procedure needs serious independently as a permanent judge, on account of the fact that consideration by the chief justice of Supreme Court and all an additional judge is subject to a fresh test of fitness and those concerned with dispensation of justice in the country. This suitability. It is obvious that he would not be in a position to deal is an undesirable practice as additional judges are members of with the matters placed before him without fear of incurring the the superior judiciary and their appointment on a temporary displeasure of one or the other key figures that have a say in basis poses a great threat to the independence of the judiciary. extension or confirmation. It undermines the faith of the public at large in dispensation of Second, dropping an additional judge at the end of his initial justice since a person working on probation as a judge remains term of office on the ground that there are allegations against conscious in making orders that may displease those who him, without properly ascertaining the truth of the allegations, is matter in confirming him. Appointment on a temporary basis detrimental to the independence of the judiciary. There is no deprives a judge from dispensing justice fearlessly and with an provision whatsoever for giving an additional judge an independent mind. There is no such concept in the United opportunity to be heard where his integrity has been Kingdom from where we have inherited the present legal impugned. If a permanent judge cannot be removed on the system – or elsewhere in the civilised world. Surprisingly, in ground that his reputation is bad, there is little justification for Pakistan, judges in the subordinate judiciary are not appointed denying an extension on the same ground. Consistent with the on ad hoc basis and their tenure of service is neither short nor principles of natural justice, an additional judge who suffers an uncertain. Hence, contrary practice at the level of high court is injury by his term of office not being extended, should be given rather surprising. an opportunity to explain any charge against him. An additional Article 197 of the constitution empowers the president to judge is not appointed on probation. He is appointed, after appoint duly-qualified persons to be additional judges if it passing the suitability test at the initial stage, to dispose of appears to him that: (a) the office of a judge of a high court is cases in the high court in accordance with his oath “without fear vacant; or (b) a judge of a high court is absent or is unable to or favour, affection or ill-will.” So, if the additional judge is not on perform the function of his office for any other reason; or (c) for probation how can his continuance, either as an additional any reason it is necessary to increase the number of judges of judge or a permanent judge, be made contingent on the a high court. If the preconditions set out in Article 197 are evaluation or assessment of his suitability? Clearly, the answer satisfied and the president proceeds to exercise the power to would be in the negative. An additional judge is as much a appoint an additional judge, he can appoint only such a person judge as a permanent one with the same jurisdiction and who is qualified and fulfils all the requirements of Article 193 of powers. Treating him on probation only detracts from his status the constitution. The eligibility qualifications for appointment as and dignity but also affects his independence by making his a judge of a high court are given in Article 193(2) – the continuance as a judge dependent on the good opinion of the qualifications for a temporary judge to be appointed under chief justice of the high court or the chief justice of the Supreme Article 197 are the same as of a regular judge under Article Court and members of the Judicial Commission (Article 175A of 193. As far as pay, privileges, duties, obligations, adjudicatory the constitution). Third, there is no denying the fact that security powers are concerned, an additional judge appointed under of tenure ensures judicial independence, while short-term Article 197 and a judge of a high court appointed under Article tenure or appointment on an ad-hoc basis can cause insecurity 193 are also at par. directly impinging on judicial independence. Fourth Article 193 of the constitution bestows a primary obligation on the president Even after the insertion of Article 175A, no effort is made to to provide adequate permanent strength to every high court to increase the number of permanent judges in the high court after enable it to cope with its normal business so as to ensure taking into consideration the increase in workload. On the expeditious disposal of cases. The strength has to be reviewed contrary, it has been a consistent policy to use Article 197 as a from time to time so that arrears do not accumulate and justice gateway through which almost every judge has to pass before to litigants is not unduly delayed. The stark reality prevailing in being made permanent. A number of judges appointed in high all the four high courts make it clear that the increase of courts had to get a number of extensions before being made business is not of a temporary character but is a permanent permanent. It is evident that in practice the true intention and phenomenon and that the arrears have accumulated to a purpose of Article 197 has not been fulfilled. The consequence disturbing level. Therefore, it is imperative not to resort to Article is that arrears in the high courts keep growing immensely from 197 but to increase the strength by making permanent year to year. At the same time, the requisite numbers of appointments under Article 193. additional judges have not been appointed by the governments, though Article 197 clearly contemplates that sufficient number The Supreme Court of Pakistan, in PLJ 1996 SC 882, of additional judges should be appointed in order to clear expressed its resentment at the appointment of ad-hoc chief arrears within a short period of time. The country is gripped in a justices. Why is the same principle not applicable in the case of vicious circle with a backlog of cases and the need for judges of high courts? The need of the hour is a complete and additional judges. correct assessment of the requisite strengths of permanent judges for every high court in terms of its workload. It is difficult to understand why judges are being appointed as additional judges even now, when there is an undisputed need If the situation so demands, the president must take immediate to appoint more permanent judges in order to cope with the steps to provide an adequate strength of permanent judges to heavy workload and to deal with the problem of arrears. Surely every high court to cope with its normal business. He must also there is no financial gain to the government as the expenditure review such strength from time to time so that arrears may not involved is almost the same whether a judge is an additional accumulate and justice is dispensed expeditiously.

FARZANA PARVEEN AND THE DEATH OF THE STATE Published on 30th May, 2014 Express Tribune

It has become a useless routine to condemn the most ghastly and nearly 1,000 women reportedly are killed in the name of acts of violence and injustice in Pakistan. For many, these are custom and tradition that is founded on a spectator sport where daily occurrences and thus the levels of desensitisation have women, minorities and the marginalised are killed with impunity. grown. So has the brutalisation of society, when it adapts to Take the case of Dr Mehdi Ali, an American-Pakistani doctor some bare facts and upholds and sometimes celebrates the volunteering in Pakistan. He was shot dead in front of his family worst of what constitutes custom, tradition or ‘culture’. What (a child included) with more than 10 bullets. And the high and else would explain the fact that there were dozens of passerby mighty of this land cannot even acknowledge that he was near the Lahore High Court — known for its imposing gunned down since he was an adherent of a faith that architecture and not the delivery of justice now — who silently Pakistan’s political and religious elite shunned through a witnessed the death of a woman scorned for choosing her constitutional edict. Exactly 40 years ago, Pakistan’s state partner? Worse, the police did not intervene either. This has officialised discrimination on the basis of faith by declaring the become the norm with what we know as the ‘state’ in Pakistan. Ahmadiyya community non-Muslim. Sadly this happened under It chooses to remain indolent, indifferent and even complicit at a civilian government backed by a political consensus. Dr times. This has left the citizen vulnerable. The weaker you are, Mehdi Ali’s murder and the brazen killing of nearly 90 Ahmadis the more chance there is of your life meaning absolutely in 2010 are but a continuum of what was decided by our nothing. elected leaders, the religious guides and of course, sections of A few weeks ago, I underwent the worst of nightmares. Seeking the press. To say that killers don’t get apprehended or punished help on a roadside with two wounded men: one almost dead in these cases is to in fact miss the larger picture. They cannot and the other struggling to stay conscious. My romanticism for be in a society that has been engineered by the state since the my own country was shattered on that fateful night of March 28. 1970s. This is why condemning an Ahmadi’s murder is I am privileged and lucky that I escaped a brutal, unsung death somehow viewed as approving of their faith by the hardliners. but a life was lost. A large crowd had gathered to ogle at the Hate speech is no longer recognised as such. It is the norm, the blood sport but none of them was willing to help in taking a correct worldview in a collective quest for mythical ‘purity. near-dead body out of the car. On a busy street, no car was There is cleansing underway now except that it has engulfed willing to stop to take my injured driver to the hospital. everyone in it. Shia genocide, attacks on Christians and Farzana’s death and her calls for help have only reopened my Hindus, targeting of Sufi shrines, almost everyone is a target of wounds — far from healed and as painful as before. This state the rival armed advocate of a puritanical ideology. Have we of our society, drunk on honour, pride, ghairat and other even debated on the increased use of mob justice from cases medieval notions of self-worth, has crossed all tolerable levels of alleged blasphemy cases to the lynching of young men of dysfunction. Yes, two girls were also hanged, allegedly gang- declared guilty without trial in Sialkot in 2010, and to instances raped in India, and crimes against women are prevalent in other of petty theft on streets. Injustice and inequities fuel this fire and societies as well. But, at least, there is collective uproar, those at the helm remain busy in pursuing the most trivial pressure on the governments and results. power games, played time and again in the sordid political In our case, it took the prime minister 48 hours after the event history of Pakistan. to take ‘notice’ and to date, the head of the Punjab government, Many have asked for arrests, others have demanded suo-motu otherwise celebrated for his style of governance, to even notice to push Farzana’s case. The few dozen ‘civil society’ condemn the barbarity in a city that he intends to turn into activists are busy chanting the decades-old slogans. All of this Paris. With all the Metro Buses and fast rails, twisted highways has been tried with no results. Mukhtaran Mai could not get and expensive underpasses, there seems to be a breakdown of ‘complete justice’ despite the suo motu, the highest level of the social fabric. Wanton violence and a high-level tolerance of judicial intervention. And in the presence of discriminatory laws, lethal outfits, their affiliates and dozens of ‘sleeper cells’, make how will victims of honour crimes even think of justice? a mockery of the shining Punjab story. There is something even more troubling at work. And it has to Farzana’s case represents all that is wrong with us: from the with the abdication of state responsibility. It is simply a misuse of a faith-based legal system that ‘forgives’ the breakdown of the fragile postcolonial citizen-state relationship. murderer, to embedded misogyny and the stark absence of a Whether Pakistan’s moth-eaten political parties and its ‘state’ that is supposedly there to arbiter citizen protection and truncated democratic process have the capacity to re-craft that welfare. Farzana’s husband had murdered his first wife to marry relationship is unclear. Thus far, the signs are not encouraging. her. Her sister also became reportedly a victim of honour killing

74°0'0"E 75°0'0"E AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR LEGAL PROFILE N N " " 0 0 ' ' 0 0 ° °

5 Saddar 5 3 3 Police Station a c City Police Station ca Supreme Police Court Station (AJ&K) Chatter ;aHigh cCourt Lawat Police Station ca

Saddar r Police i Station Police m City PolicecaStation h StationcaChatter s Supremec;a High a Court Court a K (AJ&K) c d e Police Station i Garhi Dupatta p a District u c Courts c Hattian Bala c ; O n ia d n City Police I Station Police a Station N N

" c " 0 0 ' Bagh ' 0 0 ° ° 4 4 3 ca 3 Police Legend Station TAIN a a c District c Police Station Courts Police ; Station Hajira Supreme Court (AJ&K) Trarkhel ; Mang Police Police Aazad Pattan Station c Station Police Palandri a Session ca ; High Court Station Police ;cCourts a Station c ca ; Session Courts

; District Courts

Police Police Station Police District Boundary Traffic Station ca Station ca Police Police ca a Station aStation cPolice Police acDistrict Station Provincial Boundary c;Courts Station ca ca

Khuiratta Dudyal AJK Police Police Station Station Charhoia, ca a Police c c Chaksawari Station Creation Date: April 16, 2014 Police a Station c Projection/Datum: WGS 84 Geographic ca Page Size: A3

City Police Station a Supreme Court ocf ; District ¯ Azad Jammu and Courts Mirpur Kashmir,Mirpur Bench Azad Kashmir ca 0 10 20 40 ca N N

" Police "

0 Kilometers 0 ' ' 0 0

° Station ° 3 3 3 ca 3

Barnala Police Station ca

74°0'0"E 75°0'0"E

ca ca

ca ca ca ca

a ca c

ca ca

ca 24

��ں �ت ا�م آ�د (�� ر+ آ� ا� �) ا�ب �ا� � ر� �ور �� وز�ا� را� �و� ا�ف � �رہ ��ن � �د �م �� ن � � ر� �ور �: �و� ا�ف �11 � �۔ �� ا�ب �ا� � � � � � �، �ا� � ر� �ور �ا� �ا � اور �وال � ��ن � �د �م �� ر� � � ��ن � � � �� و� � � � �� ن � �ى � دى �۔ �ا� � � �ن � �م ��ن � � �� ا� � �۔ اس �� و�� وز� �ا� �� م � � �� ، �د �م � �3 � � � � � �� اور �� ى ا �� ا�� در�ا� دا� � �۔ وا� ر� � � � �� ر� �ور � �ر �� ر�� ا�ب �ا� � �ن � � � د ا� � � � � � �ڈ�و �، �ا �، �وال اور �ر� ر� �ور � �� ۔ �روں ر�� دہ �� دور � دا� � � �۔ �ا� و�

2014 � 31 ا�م آ�د+ ��ر ( ��ہ �ا� و �+�� ر�ر� + ا�ں+ و�� ر ��) � � �� رٹ � �ق �� ر ��رٹ � �� ر� داروں � ��ر ��رٹ � �� ن � �، ��ں �� ن � �� آ� � �ب � 48 � � ر�رٹ � � � �، دو�ى �� 4 ��ں � ��ر � � � � وز�ا� � � �� رٹ � از�د �� ، �ب � ا� �� ا�وں � �ا� � � � 24 � � د� ��ں � � ��ر � � ��ن � �ے � �� ۔ وا� � � ڈ�� ا� � � ��ر � �رى ر�رٹ � ��ر ��رٹ � ��ل � � �۔ � � � � �ا� ا�� ق � � �� ا�روں � �� ب �� آ� � � 48 � � ر�رٹ � ر�رٹ �� ۔ � � �ق � �� وا� � �� ذ� داران � � ��ر �� ن � �ے � �� د�۔ اس � �وہ وا� � و� �ا� و� �� د �� ا�روں � �� ا�ر �۔ در� ا�ء � � � �� ا� �� اور �ر�� م �ون �رے �� وا� ر�ر� � � �� ۔ �رى �� ر� � �� ى �ر� اور �� دن � ا�ر اس �رے � ر�رٹ � �� ۔ 2014 � 31 اد� وز�ا� �ب � ا��ت اور ا�ر �� زا� � � � �ث �� 4 ��ن � ��ر �� آج �ا� � � � �� ۔ �ز �� ا� ا�ان � �ا� � � وہ ا� �� ں � �م ��ن � ��ر �� ن � �ے � �� د� � ��ر �� رٹ � ا�ر �� ن � � ا�� ز اور �� م � � � � �� زا� �� ن � ��ں �ء ا�، دو � زاد ��ں اور ڈرا�ر �� ر �� پ � � � �� ا� � �۔ ذرا� � �� زا� � � � �رہ ا�اد �ف �� درج �ا� � �۔ �ز �� ز� �ارت ا� � � ا�س � ا�ا� � ر�رٹ � � �، � � � ��ن � �م ��رى � وز�ا� � �� ا�ر �� د� ��ں � ��رى �24� � ڈ� �� دے دى۔ وز�ا� � � � ��ن � �� ا�اد د� �دى � �ا� � �� ، � � � � �� روزا� � �د � � � ��ہ � � ر�رٹ � �ے۔ وز�ا� � �� د� � � � وا� ا�س �ك �۔ � � ��ر � ر�رٹ � � ا� ڈى � او اور ا� ا� او � �ا� � � � �� ف و �ف �ت � � �� اور ��ن � �ف �� ر�رٹ �� 14 دن � ا�ر �ا� �رٹ � � � �� ا�ف � �ا� � � �� ۔ � � � او � � � �� آ� � � � � ر�رٹ � �� ں � 30 �ر � � ��ر �� ۔

ا�م آ�د (��ہ �ا� و�+ � �ز) �� رٹ � � � � آ� � �ں � �� ا�� ف �� ا�� ى �ل �� چ � در�ا� � �ان � � � � � �� ‘ وہ از�د �� 9�ن � �ى � دى � �۔ � �اد ا� �ا� � � � �رى �� ام � ا�ج �� وہ و� � آ� � � � � و� � آ� � �� ك � � �� گ �ك � � �� ، � �ان � � � � � �� ى �� ا� ��ں � ز�دہ اس � � � � � � ر� �، آ� اور ا�ء�ردو�ش � �ان � �� ا�ا�ت � ر� �؟ � � ا�� ن � � � ر� �۔ � اس � � � �� ام � �� : �� رٹ � ر� �۔ �ا� � ��ى �ڈ ا� �ر� �ت ا� � �� ا�� وا� ا�ا�ت � �رے � آ�ہ � اور �� ام � �ح � � � � � �� ا� و� � ا� �رٹ �ز �م � ر� � اس � �� 70ارب رو� � � � � �، � � اس و� 36�ار � �� رز � � � 3ارب � �� ى دى � � اور اس � � � � �وہ � � � 6�ار � زا� �� رز �� ر� � �� ں � �� ى � روز�ہ � ا�� ردو�ش �ا� �� اس � �رل � � �� ۔ � � � 2014 � 29 �ا� � ا�ر � � � � �� ى �ف �� ام � � � � � � � � � � � ��ى � �� رز � � �� ا� �� ۔ � �اد ا� � �ا� � � � � � � ��ر ا� �اہ د� � � � � � �ورت � اور آپ � � �ورت � �ورت � �ف �� ام � �، �� ى ان � �� اس � �ار �، �ا�ں � آ� � � ��، �ا� � �� راك � � � �� ا�ا�ت � �۔ ��ں � 2350�ر� � � ر�، � ا� � � � � اور � � �م �ر� �رى � � �ں ا� اور �� ا �� ان � � � �۔ � �اد � ��ى �ڈ �ر� � �� آپ � �ا� � � � آپ �ا� � � د� � �� ا�ا�ت ا�� ر� � � ا�� ر� ��ن �۔ آپ �� د� �� ر � ر� �۔ ��ى �ڈ �ر� � �ا� � �� ا� � � � ا�س �� ۔

ا�م آ�د (و�� ر) ا�م آ�د ��رٹ � � �� اڈ�� ى � �د � �ا� � �� 13�ن � �ى �� وا� � � � �ا� ا�اد � � � �� ا�ا�ى ر�رٹ � � � �۔ �ا� � آ� � � �� ب � ا� �ا� � وا� � �ت � � � د� �۔ � �� آ� � � �� ت � �� ، �م �ى � ڈ�� ا�ر � � �ں � ��ل � در� � �؟ �� ں � � � �� وہ � � ڈ� � �، �ا� ��ں � � �� م �ى � ڈ�� ، ��ں � �ا�� ك �� دا� �، �ڑ� �ى � �� ا� �� ، � �ں � ا�� ؟ ا� �: ا�م آ�د ��رٹ آ� � � �� ت � � � � دار �� ان � �ف � �رروا� � �۔ آ� � � �� ت �ب � �� ڈى آ� � �� ا� � ا�ا�ى �ا� و� �وع � � � � ��ہ �ى � �ن � �ا� � ا�ر � د� � اور � � � وہ �ا� � ا� �ن ر�رڈ �وا � �۔ در�ا� �ار � و� � ا�ا�ى � �م ا�د � ا�ر � د�۔ � �� آ� � ��! � � � ر� �؟ �� ى � � �م ر� � اس � �ا�� ك �وع � د� �� ۔ � � � 2014 � 28 � ��ت � در� �ں �؟ �ں � �� ں � �� ، ا� آپ � � � � دار �� آپ � �ف � �رروا� � �۔ � �ں � ا�ف اور �ں � د��ارى � � �ا� ��ں � � � � ا� � ڈى �� ، �وں � �ح �ح � �� آ� �۔ �� ت � � رز� ��۔ � � � ا�زت � �

�د � � ا� �ر � � دورہ �وں �۔ � �� ى � � �د �� وا� ا�ر � �ف د� �� آ� � ��! اس � آ�ں � د� �� آ ر� �، � �� ا�ر ا�رہ دارى �� ر� �۔ اس � ��رہ ا�ر � �آن � � ا�� د � �، � �� ا�ام �۔ � �� آن � � � ا� �، � �آن �ك �� ؟ � � � � � ��ں � �رے � �آن � � �؟

ا�م آ�د (��ہ �ا� و�) �� رٹ � �� ہ � �� ا� �� 35 ا�اد اور �ات � �� ن � � �ا� � �� آج � �� اور د� اداروں � در�ن �� ى �دى �۔ �ا� � �� ا�ر �� ڈى � آ� � ، ��ى دا� ��وا � � ��ت � ��؟�ا� � ا�ر� �ل � �ا� � وہ �� ف � �دم �، � � ر� � �� وا� ا� � آ� �و�ام � �ا� � �ت � � �ا� � �� اداروں � در�ن �دم � �� ن ا�ل ر� � � �ن � � � و �م � اداروں � �ہ �� ا � اداروں � �ف � � �� وا� �و�ام اور �ز �� ن � � �اد ا� �ا� � � � � اداروں � �ف �رى �� ن � � �: �� رٹ �� دہ �ا�ى � ا� � � � � ا� آ� �ن � �رے �ے �ں �� ر� �� اور د� اداروں � در�ن �� دم � � اب � �ا� و� � � ر� � � �� ن � � �۔ �� ا�اد � � � �اد ا� �ا� � � � �ا� �ر �ل � �� ا�اد � �� ر� � � �� اب � اس �ا� � � � ر� ��۔ وزارت د�ع � �ر �ر �� ا� � �� اب � � � �� رے �ف �ز � �� ۔ ��ى دا� � 2014 � 28 � � � � �� اس � � � � �� آ�ى �رے � �ے �۔ � �اد ا� �ا� � ��ا� � � �ار ا� اور � دو� � �ن � � � ر� � � � � �� ا�ر� �ل �ن ا� � � �ن � � �� اور اس � ا� �� وس �� آ� � � �ر � �ث �� ر�رٹ �ا� � � � ا ور ا�� اس � ان � ��ہ � ��۔ اس � � � �� ۔ � �اد � � �ا� اس � د� � �، � � �� ا�اد � � �ا� � � � ر� ��۔ � �اد � � اس �� ا� آ� آر � �ں� �� ا� ��ں � � ذ� ��د �، � � � ان � � ا�ام �ِ ،ان � � � � �� ر� � � � �ون �و � وہ �ون � � �ر � ��ِ � �ف � � د�� ز�ب �ا � �� اور �� ر �ا� اور ��ر آ� � �� ا� � ��،� � � ��ت �� اور �س � � � �ى �� اس � �� ا� �ث � �� اس � � � � � �ں � � � � �، � �ں �� ر� � اور �رے � � �ز آو�اں � د �� ر� زون � � � �وف � � � � � ’’�ى � � �� ر� دارى � ا�م آ�د � �ظ �� ر� زون � آ� �ز�ان ا�م � �ف �ز � آو�اں � � � � � �ار �� ا�ں � � ں د�� ۔ ا�ں � ا�ر� �ل � ا� � وى �و�ام � ا�س � �� اس �و�ام � � � � � �ج � � اور �د �، آ� ا� � آر � ان �و�ا�ں � �� ور �� ڈ� � �� ر� �، � ��ك � ا�ر� � ل � �� و�ام � ��، � �اد � � � �ا� � ا� �� ا��، �زى � اور � � �رى � � � �۔ ِ وزارت دا� اور آ� � �� و�� ادارے � � ان � �� دن � � � �� ف �ز � ر� اور ان � � � � � � � �ز�ان ا�م �ن � � � و �م � �� اق � � ر�� اداروں � �ف �ت � دوران �� ا� � و� � �ا� � �� وہ �ون � � �ں ا� � � �ر �ر � د�� ر� � ’’� �اد �ا� � � �� ر� دارى � ا�� ٹ � � � و �م � �� ورت � �� ن � � اس �ح � �� ر� ا�ں � ا� اور �� م ا� ار� � � آ� �د �� ا�ر � � ا�ں�� وہ �ى � � � � � ا�ں � � وہ �ى � �ا � اس � �� ر �� ۔ ا� ا� آ� � �� اد ا� �ا� � � ڈى � آ� � اور ��ى دا� �� ا� � � �ا � � آ� � � �ے �ف �رروا� �� ۔

ا�م آ�د (�ا� و� ر�رٹ+ ا�ں) ا�ب �ا� � او�ا �� دق � 11 ��ں � �د�م �� دى �۔ ��ں � � �م � ا�ر � �۔ او�ا �: �� دق �11 ��ں ا� �م �زا �د ا�وو� � �ت � �� ر�� ڈ�رج � د� �۔ را� �و� ا�ف، �� ر� �� 4 �ن � �ا� � � � � �۔ � � �� د �م ��، �� ، �و� ا�ف � ا�ب �ا� � ��، � �ا�� را� �م ا�ز � �� ا�ر � � ��ں � �ف �ا�ں اور ��ں � �م �� رے � د � � � � اور �د�م �� ا�� ۔ �ا� � آ�ہ �� ا�� د� � � �۔ � ��ن � �د �م �� ان � �ا�� ن، ار�ن ا�ل اور �� 4 �ن � � � � � �، � �ل �� ا�، �اد �، � �� ڈ � �ى، �، �ر �ت �� اور � �دق �� ۔ �� او�ا �� دق � ا�رات � �� ا�ل اور �دات �ا� و� �� ا�ام �۔ � � �� ا�ں � او�ا � �� ں، �ر�ں � �، �� ر � � ا� � �ں � �� رى �۔ �� او�ا �رى � � دو�ں �� وزرا� ا� �� ر� �� اور را� �و� ا�ف � �د �م �� ۔ را� �و� ا�ف اور �� ر� �� 6 ��ں � �د�م 2014 � 27 �� 4 �ن � �ر� �ر � �۔ �� وز� ا� را� �و� ا�ف � �م اى � ا� � �� در�ا� � �� ا�ب �ا� � � � � � �۔ دوران �� را� �و� ا�ف � و� � �� در�ا� � �م � � �� و� � � �۔ �ا� � � � �� 29 � � �ى � دى۔

ا�م آ�د (��ہ �ا� و� + ا�ں) ا�� ا�م آ�د وا� � �ن � �ف � �زى �ا�� ى � � ا� اور �� در�ا� �زى ر� � : �ف � ��ى � � � � �د � دى �۔ �ا� � �ف � � د� � � وہ آ�ہ �� 12 �ن � � �رت �ا� � � �ں۔ �ا� � �� ر � دو�ں � ��ں � � � د� � � � � ا �� در�ا� �د‘ 12 �ن � � وہ 12 �ن � �ف � �� ا� � � �ں۔ �ا� � �� ا� � � وہ �ف � � � � �ر� ا��ت �ے � �ا� � �ار د� � � ا� �و� �ف � � �� زر�� ، �� خ � � � �۔ �ف � و� � ا�� ا�ر � � �ف �ا� �ں � � ��۔ اس � � �رت � �ں : �ا� ا� �ہ � � � � �ف �ر � اور �ر� ��ت � �� ۔ و� � �ف � � � �� اور ��ى � ا� � در�ا� دا� �۔ ان � � � �ا� و� � �ف � �ر� �ا� � �� وہ �ا� � � � �� در�ا� � �ا� � ا� �ہ � � � � �و� �ف � �م �� دو � ر� � �۔ ا� آ� آر � �د �۔ �ف � �ف �� ت �۔ �رون ا�� و� � � � � �ف �ر �ر �ر� ��ت � �از � � �ا� � � � � ر� اس � آج 2014 � 23 � � � �� اور �و� �ف � � �رت �ا� � � ��۔ دو�ى �� ا� � �ف � �ف �ارى � � �� ا� � و� د�ع � دو در�ا�ں � �� رى �� ا�� د� � � وہ �� ا�ں � �� اور � � د� ر�رڈ �ا� اور �ف � �ا�� ا� �� آج � 23 � � �ى � دى � �۔ و� د�ع � �� ا�ر � � ا� �ا� � � �و�د � � � ر�رڈ �ا� � � � � ا� و� � ا�ں � دو در�ا� دا� � �۔ 24 �ا�ں � 7 � ��ت ��د � � � � � �ا� � � ��ت � ز�دہ � �وں � ��ت � � � ز�دہ ا� � � دو�ى در�ا� � � � ا� 7 �� 2007ء ا�� ا� � 44و� ا�س � �، �م وزراء اور �وں�� م، ا�� اور �� ں، اس و� � �� وزراء ا�، �ر�ز، وز�ا� �� ، �ر اور آر� �ؤس � �� وا� � � ر�رڈ، �ف � �ہ �ڑ� اور �ل �� ر آر�

� � �ہ �� ں، ا�� اور �� اس و� � �ر ��رز � �م، �ان �� وز�ا� اور �� اران � �� ، �ر �ف � �ن � � ر�رڈ �ا� � � � � � �ا� � �ا� � دے اس � � �اب اور �ا�ن � �ح � � � �۔ � �ب � � � ر�رڈ آپ � � � � � � � �۔ ا�ں � � � ��ى دا� ��د � آپ ان � �� ر�رڈ �ا� �� د � � �۔ � آ� � ر�رٹ � � �� وہ �ا� � �� ، �ا�� ا�م � � � � �ا� � � � � و � � �� ر�رڈ �ا� �� رہ � � وہ ا� دن � �ا� � د� �� ۔ ا�ں � � � اب ��ى دا� � � �� ورت � ان � �م � �� ہ � � ان � �ن � � � �، �ا� � �ار د� � ا� � � � � �ں ڈ� �� ان � �ح �ے � اور ان � �ن � � ا� اور ��ى � �� اہ � ان � �ن � �رٹ �� ۔ ر�رڈ �ا� � � � �� ا� �د ڈ� �� ا� �� ر�رڈ � � � � �� ر �ر �ى � � � �ا� روزا� � �د � � � �� ہ ر� �۔

ا�م آ�د (�ء �ز) � � � �� وا� �م � � و � � ��ى � �� در�ا� � �� رٹ � �� ر �� م � � و � � ��ى…�ب �ب �� د� � � وہ اس �ح � �� ا�ا�ت � �ز ر�۔ � ر� � � ا�� ا�وو� �ل �ب � ر�ے � � � � د� � وہ 28 � � �� ا�ام � �ز ر� : �� دوران اس �ت � و�� آ� � و� � � � � � � �� ى � �ب � �ا �� وا� �م � �� ا�زت � دى �ر�۔ � � �� ا�� ى �ل �� چ � �� دا� در�ا� � � �� ۔ � � � � � � اس � � �و�د � �� رٹ ��ن ا� زر� � �، ��ں � � � ز�دہ �اں � � آ� �� ر � �ر� �۔ � � � � ا�وو� �ل � �� در�ا� � �� ا� و� اس �ت � ا�س � ا�ر � � � �� ب � ا� �ود � �� م � � و � � � ا�� ى �� ر� �۔ ��ن � ا�وو� �ل �م ا�� م � � � � �� ۔ ا�ں � و�� ن �� ل �ں � �� ارب رو� �ض � � ��روں � �م �� 2014 � 22 �، اور اس � اس �� اڑ� �وڑ رو� �ر �د ادا �� ا� و�� د ادا �دے � �م � � � � �رى � از � � رو� � � � آ� �۔ در�ا� �ار � و� � �ا� � � � وہ �� رى �ے � وہ � � �م � �ں � � � �ر �ے، � �ا� � وا� � � وہ �� ا� � � � � �ا�ت �رى � �ے �۔ � �اد �ا� � � � آپ ا� �� ى �ل � �� ر� � � � �ر� � � �� د �۔ ا� �� وہ � �� ا� � ا��۔ �ا� � ا�ر� �ل � � د� � وہ �� دوں � وزار ِت � �ڈ �ر� ا� ر�چ � �ون � �روں ��ں � � ا�ان � �� ان � �ڈ �� ا� ا�س � ا�م �� اور ا� �� ر�رٹ � �ا�۔ �ا� � � � � � ا� �� ام � � �ڈ �� ر� � �� دے � ��ں � �دى �ق � � � � � � � � اس � �� وہ آ� � �� ے اور � �ں � �رج �دے۔ �ا� اس و� �ا� �ے � � �� دى �ق � � � � �� م ر� �، � � آ� � �� دى � �۔

ا�م آ�د (ا�ں) �� رٹ � � � � � �م � �ا� � ر�وٹ ڈا� � �� ب � �� ں � آ� اور د� �دى �ور�ت ز�� ا� �رے �ں � ا�� ك � ، �ام � و�ق اور ��ں � 28 � � �اب � �� ۔ �ا� � � � �� چ � در�ا� � �� دوران �رى � �۔ � �اد ا� �ا� � � � � �� ا�� ور� � � � � �ا� �رٹ �� اور � � �� ں � �دى �ق � � � �ل � � �� ۔ 41 �ل �ر � �م آد� � �ف �و� � �� ر� �۔ ��ں � آ�ں � د�ل �� را� �م ،آ� اور د� ا�ج �� ا� �ر� �۔ �� آد� � �ے � � ��۔ ��ں ،�دا�ں � �م �ى � ر� �� : �� رٹ �۔ �� م � ر� � اور ا� �م � �� ف �� ں � �۔ � ا��ا� �ر ز�� د� �ڑ د�۔ �� ا� ا� ��ں � �� ا� و� ��ں � � ��۔ � �� دا� در�ر � �� آ� �� دے �۔ �� د �� ن �زى � � �۔ �� ب � ا�ار � � اس � ا�ا�ت ��ں � � ا�� ا� �� ب � �گ ��ل �� ؟ و�ں � ��ں � �م اور آ� � ��ں � د�ب � � � � 2014 � 21 ان � � � � � د� � ۔� ڈا�� رى � �� ۔ و�ق اور �� ں � �ور�ت ز�� ارزاں ��ں � �ا� � � �� ۔�� ا�� ا� � ��د � وہ �� ن �زى � � �ں آواز � ا��، �را �م �ا�ں � � ��۔ ا� �رے �م � � � �� ں � � �ا� �� رہ � �� ۔ � �ار ا� � ر�ر� د � � � � و�ق اور ��ں �آ� � آر�9، 14 اور 38 � �رآ� �ا� ��۔ �� وع �� اد ا� �ا� � و�ق اور ��ں � ر�رٹ � � � � ��ں � ر�ر� � �وا�۔ � � � �� ف � �ا� � �� ب 4500 �ك � �م � � �� د� � ا�ر � د� � � �ب � �م � �ے �ك � �رڈر �اس �� ۔ � �اد � � � �ا� � � اس �� ت �ا� �۔ �ا� �ون � �� اب ��ت � � اور ر� � � � � � ا� � � � اور � ر ��۔ � �دى ا�� ق � � �� ۔و�ء اور �ا� � � �� ز � � آ� � آر� (3)184 � ��ت � � ز�دہ � �� ۔ � ا� �� ا� �۔ د� � � � ��ں � اس � � � � ا�ر د� � د� � � �ا� �ور�ت � �ت � ر� � � �ں � �� گ �� ر� � اور � � اس � �وا � � �۔ اب �ا� � � � � � � � �� ا� � �و� � �ے � �ا� � � � �ے � � � � � � �ور �� ۔ ��ں � �� د� � ��ش � رہ �۔ �ھ � � ان � �ورت � �� م �ا �� ۔ � � ز�دہ � � � � اور ��ن � �۔ ا�وو� �ل �ھ � �ا� � �� رڈر � �س12 �ر � � � � �م � آ� �� ۔ � �اد � � � آ� � �ں � �رے � �ز� ا�ك �۔ د� � � �ں � � � � ��ن � � ا�� ود �۔ � � �گ � ر� �را� �ر � ��ت �ا�م د� �۔ � � �ز �۔ ��ں � ا�ج � � ر� � �ڑ�23 � �ر� � � ر� � د� � � �ت � � ر�رٹ آپ � دى � اس � ��ہ � �۔ ��ں � اس � � � � �� ۔ و�ق � �� ا� � ذ� دارى � ۔��ى ��ر � � � �ف آ�� دے � �۔ � � آ� �� ں � ��ن �زى �� وا�ں � ر� آ� �۔آ�� آ� � اس � �رآ� � � ر� �۔ 41 �ل �ر � �� ف آ�� ا� ذ� � � ر� اس � �رآ� � �ا�۔ � ��ى �ڈ �ر� � �� ا�ں � �� را� � � اس �ا� � � �و�ام 70 � ��ا�ں � د �� ر� �۔ � �اد � � � آپ � � � � � �� اور ا� �� آ� � ر� �۔ آپ � �� د� � � اس � �ق روا ر� ��۔آج �زار � آ� � � ر� �۔500 رو� � 20� �ام �و� � ر� � � � د�۔آپ � ��ن � �� د� �۔ آپ اس � � �ن � �۔ 1150 رو� � 20 � �ام راو�ى � �و� �� ر� �۔ � �رڈر � � � �ر �ر �� ں � �ر � �� ۔ آ�، �م اور �د �� ر �رى �۔ �رى آ�ں � �� ر� �۔ آپ اس � �اہ �۔ � �ہ � � � آ� � �� ر ا� �۔ � �اد � � � ا� � � �� ز�� ار ر� � اس � ز�� ار� � �� ۔ � �ار � � � �� ت � �ڑ د�۔ آ� و ��ن � �ت ��۔ � �اد � � � � � اس �ت � � و� �� اس �ا� � �ر� �م د� � اس � � ��ہ � �۔ دا� در�ر � � � آج � � ر� � � �� ور�ت � �رى �ں �۔ �� رہ �� ۔ آج دودھ � اور �� ز�دہ � ر� �۔ ا� �� زا� ڈ� ا� �� وا� �گ ��د �۔ � �دى �ور�ت ��۔ �� ں � � � � ا�ج د�۔ � را� ڈ� �� ں � ��ہ د� � � �را �م �۔ � �� م

� �۔ � �ار � � � �� ں � آپ �راك � � � د �� اس � � ��ہ ،�راك � د� اس � �� را � ��۔ � �اد � � � � د� � � د� � اس � �ت � �� ۔ �ا� � �� ا� �� ا� �� د� � � �� را ك � �ا� � �م � � � �۔ آ� � �� آد� � �ا� �� ۔ � �اد ا� �ا� � � � � 45 �ل � آ� � �رآ� � � � ر� ا� �� آ� � آر� 9 اور 38 � � درآ � � � � � � ا� آ� � �ل د� �� ں �ں �� ام ��دى ا� �ا� � �ے � �ا� �ور �ا� �ے �۔ � �� ذ� دارى �، �ا� � �� ر� �ا� �� ر�و� �� ۔ �ام � � �ل � ا�� ور� ان � �ت �� ۔ �رى د� � �ڈ �ر� � �� ا�ا�ت � � � �رے �ں �� آ �۔ �� د ر� � � ر�و� �� ، � �زاروں � � � � � � ��م ��۔ �� ام � � �دى �� ا� �� ۔ �ا� � �� ا� �� ان � � ز�� ا�ن �، اس � �� ر� �۔ � � � ا�م آ�د(آن ��) �� رٹ � �� ان � و� �رق ا� ا�وو� � �� اور �� ل �م � �د � � ا�اج � �� رے ر�� رٹ � �� اور �� ل �م � � � � �� ا� �دى � �� و� ا�ا� اور �ور � �� ا�� ا� � ان ر�� ر� � اور ا� �ا� � ان � � �� وزارت � � � � � � � �د � �ج �� ر�� د�ع � � � � � �� ف �� درج � ان � �� اور �� ر�� ا� � ر� � �، اد� رو�� ا� �ار دے � � � � � � �ا� ان ر�� ا� � � � ر� �۔ �ا� � ��ہ � � �� س ادارے �ف دا� �� ا� � در�ا� �د �دى �۔ � �� ا� �� ا� � دى � � � � ر�ر� د� �� و� � وہ د�� د� �� ان � �� ہ � �� ا� � � � �ار د� � � � ر�۔ ر�� ا� و� � ا�اج � �� اور �� و� ا�رات د �� د� �� ا� � ان ر�� ف � د� � � � ا�رات �� ؟ ا� �ا� ان ر�� م �ار د� � � �� اس � و� � � اس و� � و� اور ا�� ا�ر� �ل � �� در�� ر �� ر� دے � � 2014 � 20 � �رق ا� � د�� ا� � رو�� د� �۔ ا�ں � � � د� وا� �ں �ف ر�� ڈ� �� دا� � ر� � �۔ ا�ں � � د�� روز د �� ۔ � �� ا� � �� ن � � ز� �ا� ر� � � اس � ا�� ا�ر� �ل � �� ر�� 2011ء � � 16اى � � ز� �ا� ر� � � � �� ا� � � � �� ا�� ور � ا� � اس � � �ر� �۔ � �� ا� � � � ان � � �� ا�ام � � اس � � �ہ � آرڈر �ھ � ��۔ � �� ا� � � � ان � �� ل درج � � � وہ �ں ز� �ا� �۔ � �ہ � �� ت � �� ر�� ز� �ا� ر� � ا�زت د� � � ا� �� اس � �ا� � ��۔ � �ہ � �� 11� � وہ �� اور اس � � ان � �ا� ��۔ � �� ا� � � � �ل �ور ا� رو� � � �؟ � �ہ � �� ا�اج � ��ن � �� ل ادارے � � � �د � � � �۔ � �� ا� � � � اس �ا� � �ص �� ذ� � � �۔ � �ہ � �� 245 � � آر� �ر� � � � �� ر�� اور �� ۔ �وہ از� �د �� رٹ � ا�� ا�وو� �ل �ب رزاق اے �زا � � �� ڈا� �ان � � �ا� � �ا� اور ڈى وى ڈى � ��ہ � � �اب 22 � � �ا� � �� د� � � ا�ر � �� ر�ر� د� �� د �� از � � � اور � �دى �ق � �ا� � اس �� در�ا� �ار � ز�دہ د� �‘ ا� ڈا� � � �ن اور �دت ا� �� ا� �ور ��ہ � �۔ آ� �د �� ا� � ا�� ڈا� �ان � � �ن اور �س �ا� اس �ت � �� ا�ف � �ا� � ان � وڈ� � � ذر� �ن ر�رڈ �� ا��ت �رى � ��۔ ا�� ا�وو� �ل � �ا� � �ن د� � �س اداروں � ا� اور �� ر �ف � �ن � � � �ت وا� �� د �� اب اس د� � � ر� اور ان � ز�ہ �� ا� � �� دت ��د �۔ � � �� (ا�ں) �� ا�اد د� �دى �ا� � ا� �� ف � ��ى � ا� روز ا� � در�ا� �ر �� ا� آ�ہ �� 16 �� : �ف � � � ��‘ � �ن � � �رت � �� د� �۔ �� رق ا�ر �� ۔ �� وز� دا� آ�ب ��و اور �� وز� دا� � � ��وا� اور �و� �ف � دو �� ا� � � ��۔ �ا� � ��ں � �ا� � � وہ آ�ہ � � �� ر � ��ى � ��۔ �ف و� � �� د � 16 �ن � � �رت �� ں: �ا� � ا� روز � � ��ى � ا� � در�ا� دا� � � � �ا� � �ر ��۔ ا� �� و� � �� ا�ر � � �� ر �� ں �رى ر� �� ا� و� � � � اور �ل �ل � �م � �ا� � � � � ر�۔ ا �� ٰ�� د ر�ا� �د � ��۔ آ�ب ��ؤ اور � � ��وا� � �� در�ا� دا� � 20 � 2014 � �۔ �� و� �ف � �� ر � � آرڈر �رى � � � �۔ �� ا� �� و� � � � � �� ا� � �� د� ��ں

�� اور او� � � ��ر � �۔ �د ر� � �ف اب � اس �� ا� � � �� ۔ ا�م آ�د (آن ��+ �ا� و� ر�رٹ)�� رٹ � راو�ى � �� ار د� � � � ز�د� ا�� ں � �دى �ق � �� ا� �م �� ن � �� رروا� �ے � �ات � �� ن � � �ا� � ا�� ا�ر� �ل � �ہ � آر� �م � را� � �رٹ �ا� ��: � �اد � ��ت �� اور 27 � � �ا� � ر�رٹ � �� ا� � �۔ � �اد ا� �ا� � ر�ر� د� �� ں � �ام � �دى �ق � �ں �۔ �� رٹ �ا� �ے � ۔ ��ں � آزادى اور �دى �ق � �� ۔ �� آر� اور د� �س اداروں � �ا� و� �ط � � � � ��۔ �س اداروں � �ر�د� � �ا� � � ان ��ں � �ا� � �� ور �� آ� �� س اداروں � ا� ر� �۔ �ن 20 � 2014 � � �� ں�� ء آ� � �� 21 �رچ 2010 � �� ا�اد � � � �ا�ت � رو� � �� ر � � � � �ر�ت �

�� درج � �۔ ان � �� ا�اج � ا�ام �� ۔ � � � اس �ا� � �ت � اور � �ط ار�ل � ۔� �ار � � � � � �� آر� �م � � �۔ � �ہ � � � �ا� � � دے � اس � � � ��۔ �ء آ� � � � � �� ت �رى �۔

ا�م آ�د+ ��ر (��ہ �ا� و�+ �ر� ر�ر�) ا�م آ�د ��رٹ � �� ذ� ا�ف � �ل � د� اور � � � �رى � � �� ار د��۔ � � � �رى ��م، ا�م آ�د �ا� �� رى � � � �� ر �� رى � ��م �ار د� �۔ ا�م آ�د ��رٹ � � ا�ر ��رٹ � ذ�ءا�ف � �� ا� �� ن �� رڈ � ��ف 38�ز� � � �ل � د�۔ �ا� � ا� � � 10�ورى 2014ء� �رى �� وا� �� ر � � �، ا� � ��م �ار د� �� رڈ � �� ا� �رى � � � � �� د�۔ �� ذ� ا�ف � �ا� � � �� ے � �ل � د� ا�ر �� آج � � � �� ر� � � ��، �� م ا�ا�ت �� ۔ ان � � � � � �ا� � � �� ا� � ��ل �ا� و� � �ا، آج �ا� آرڈر � �� ار � �رج �ل �ں �۔ اے ا� ا� � �� وى � � �� ذ� ا�ف � � ا� �� ا� �� اور �� ادا �� ں۔ � �� ں، � � � دور � �� ا � � � ا� �� دوں �۔ � �گ �� ے � �ں � ا� 2014 � 18

ر� �� دوں � � � �وں � � �� ا� �وں � �رى ر�ں �۔ ا�ں � � � دن � � �ى �ر�� ر� �، �رت � �� ا�

�ت � اس � � �� ۔ ا�ں � � وز�ا� �از�� ے �ر � �رى �ت � � � ان � � �� ں۔ وز�ا� ��ت � و� د�۔ ��ر � �ر� ر�ر� � �� ا�م آ�د ��رٹ � �� دو�ى �ر � � �� وا� �� ا� آر او � ذر� آ� � �ا� � �� ، اب �� اور ذ� ا�ف �� ا� � �ﺅں �۔ �ا� �� ا� � � �� ا� � � �م � �ى ��ں د� � ر� �، ا� �� ا� �� ت � � ر� � � وہ ��ر � آ� ا�� ۔

ا�م آ�د (��ہ �ا� و�) �� رٹ � اوور� ��ں � ا��ر� � در� �ت اور ��ت � �م �ا� � � از�د �� ل ا�ى اوور� ��ں � �ت � از�د ا� � � �د�ى �� رى �� آ�ہ �� ا� ذا� �ر � � � � � �� آ�ہ � 23 � � �ى �دى � �۔ � �اد ا� �ا� � �� : �� ل ا�ى ا� � �‘ � ر�ر� د � � � �ل ا�ى ا� � ��اہ � �ا� � �و� � آر� 204 � � �� ا� � �� ۔ 16ارب ڈا�ز � زر�د� � وا� �ر� و� ��ں � ��ت � �م � �ار � � ر� �، �ا� � �ٰ اس �ش � � � � 27 �ن 2011ء �� ت � �ى آ� �� ا� �� ا� � �� : ا� �ت � � درآ � � �� ر�ر� د� � �ا� � � �� ، � �� وا� ذ� داروں � �ف � �رروا� � � �اد �� ، � اے اے ا� ر��ى ا�ر� � � � �ر�د� اور � ا�� ہ وہ �د دوران � د� � �۔ ڈا�� آ� � � �ا� � ا�ر � �� ا��رٹ � �ر� و� � � � ��ت �ا� �� ر� � اور �واز� دوران �ر� � � � � �رم � اردو ز�ن � �رى � �� ، �ا� و� � آ� اے � ا��ا� �� وں � � درآ � �� ، � � � �� ر � �ا� �� اس � � ا��ا� �ا� � �� ر� �� اس و� ادارے 17 � 2014 � � �ں � �� ر� و� � �� م ��وں � ��ت � �ا� �ل ا�ى ا� � �ل � �� ذ� دارى �� ۔ � �اد

ا� �ا� � ڈا�� د �� ل ا�ى ا� � � ا�ر ا� ا�ر� � �� وہ �� ں � �۔ ا� � �د �� د�ں ��، د� اور ��ر� � � �� دوران � �رم � �� د� �� وہ � ا��ى، ��، �� اور د� ز��ں � �� اردو ز�ن � � �� وا� �ر� و� ��ں � �ت � �� ن � ا��ر� � ا��ى � د� �� ز��ں � ا��ت � �� اردو اور د� �� ز��ں � ا�ن � � �� و�ں � �� ز�ن � ا�ن � �� ۔ �ل ا�ى ا� � �� م �ز� � �ا� �ر� و� � � � ا� زر�د� � ادا� �� ان ��ت د� � �� ر �۔ � �ون � � و �دورى �� ان � �ار � �� ، �� ل ا�ى ا� � �� ا� � �رروا� � �� ے �۔ �ازاں �ا� � �� اے اے � �� رى �� آ�ہ �� ۔

ا�م آ�د (�ا� و� ر�رٹ+ � � �+ آن ��) �� رٹ � 35�� ا�اد � �ز�� ا� � � � �� دوران ا�ر� �ل � � � � �ر� �ر� �� ار� �� ا� � � ا�روں � �ف ا� آ� آر درج � � � � � �اد ا� �ا� � ر�ر� � � � �� رٹ � �ے � � �� ا�اد � � ��د �� ار � � � � �ل �رٹ � � � �� : �� ا� � � � �ل �ا� وا� �� ۔ � � � � �� ن � ا�ر� �ل ا� � � �� رٹ � �� ل �ا� � �ث ��ں �ف ا� آ� آر � درج � � � � � ان ��ں � �ف �� ل �ا�ں � � � � � � وہ �� ورت � � �ا� � �� ۔ ا�ر� �ل ��ں � �اد � �ل �ا�ں � �� ٴ� 26 � � �ا� � دا� �وا� �۔ ا�ر� �ل ا� � � �� ل �ا� � �ث ا�اد � �ف ا� آ� آر �ا� و� درج � �� ا�م �۔ �ا�ِ � � ا�ر� �ل � اس �ن � �� ار د� �� ا� �ا� � � وہ �� ورت � � �ا� � � � �� آ� �� ا�ر � �ف ا� �� ا� � � �� درج � اور �ل �ا� � �، � �ن � �ا� اس �� ر� �؟ �ا� � �� 2014 � 16 �ل �ا� � �� ل �ا� �م (� آر � �) � ا�ق �� ا�وں � � �� ؟ ان �ا�ت � ا�� اس � آ� � � �� م ا� �� ا�ر � �ف �� ا� � � �� ا�ار � ر� �۔ �� ج � �� ار ا�ن ا� � �ف �� ہ �� ى � � �� ا� � ر� � �� رٹ � � � ا� آ� آر درج � � � � � دوران � �� م � ا�ن ا� � �ف �رٹ �ر� � �رروا� �وع � دى �۔ �� م � اس �� وا� �ات � �ل ا�� ا� � � ذر� اس �� رروا� آ� �� د� �۔ �ات � روز �� دوران �ا� � و� �� ر��ڈ ا�م ا�� ان � را� � ا� �� ل �ا� � � �س � اور �� ا� � اس � �� ن � �رم �� ؟ ا�م ا�� ا� � �� ا�ر� �ل � اے � اس �ال � �اب � �� ا� � � � � � اس �رت � و�� ا�ق � � وہ �� ے � اس � � �ے۔ �ء �ز � �� رٹ � ا�ر� �ل اور ا�وو� �ل � � � � ا� آ��ى � �� وس �� م � �ف �� رے � �� ا�ں � �اب � � �۔ �ا� � �ال � � � � �م �� وا� �� م �ا� � � � � �� ا� �؟�ن � ��ن �ا� � �� ا��ى ا�ر � � �� ا� � �� ا�ر د� �۔ � �ا� � �� ف �� ا� � �� در�ا� �ر �� ۔ �ا� � �ار د� � �ج � � �� در�ا� � � � ان � �م � وہ � �� رم � � �۔ ا�وو� �ل � � � � � � � آر� ا�ر� � در�ا� اس و� آ� � �م �� ار ا�ن اﷲ آر� �م � ز� �ا� �۔ � �� ى ا�ع � �� آر� ا�ر� � �س � � � آ� � � �۔ � آر� ا�ر� � �س � �� ا�ں � �ن ر�رڈ � � �۔ � �اد ا� �ا� � � ا�ر � � � �ث ا�اد � �ف �رٹ �ر� � ر� � آپ � � � �رغ � � � � � �ے �ج � د �� ۔ �� ا� ا�رات ا�ل �ے �� اب آپ � � �� آر� ا�ر� � �س � � اب � � � � �� وا� آپ � �س آ� � � و � ر� �۔ � �اد ا� �ا� � ر�ر� د � � � اس � �� وس ا�روں � �ف ا� آ� آر درج � � � ۔

ا�م آ�د(��ہ �ا� و� + �ء �ز) �� رٹ � �� آ�د� � �� وا� � و� �ں � �� م � �� از�د �� آ�د� �: ��ں � � � �� 19� � �ى � � �� ا�ر� �ل ��ا� � � � وہ اس � � �ا� � �و� � � اور�� و � اداروں � در�ن را� اور � � � � �راك ، �ا � وا� د� �ون � �دار ادا �� ں � � ا�از � �� ا� � �� ا�� م � � �اد ا� �ا� � ر�ر� د � � � �� ں � � 600ارب رو� �رى � � �ے � � ا� �� ا�ر � � �چ � � �ر� ان � � � � �� اور ��ں � � ا� � وا� د� �� وہ � �� ے: �� رٹ �� ر� �چ ��؟ � ر� �چ �� ل �� ،�ا� � �ھ � �وہ �� ا�وو� �� م � � �� ا�ر �� ا� و� �� ا� � �و� � ان � �ف آ� � �� رروا� � � �� ؟ �ا� ��ت � �ں �� ا�ر � � �ر� �۔�ھ � � �اد ا� �ا� � ��ا� � � ر� � � � � �� اس �� ا� � � � آ� �ں � �� ں � �ح و�د اور�� ان � 2014 � 15

� ذ� دارى � �ا� �� ں � �� 600 ارب رو� � �ر� آ� � ا س ر� � ��رے � � � �ں آ�د �� ا ن �� ا� � ا�

� � �ا� � � � �ر� اس � � آ� � ا س � �رے � �� وہ �ں �ں �چ � �� ا� � اس �رے � �� ۔� �ں � � �ا � � � �ل � د� � � � ر� �۔ � ��د � � �ام � � � ر�۔�ام � � � � ر� � � �� اور � �� ر� �۔�ك � �� وا� ا� �ل � �� زار � �رے � ا�ر �� و� �ا� � � � � � �اد ا� �ا� � � � اس � � � �ڑوں � ا� �� ۔ ا� ��ں � � �� ۔�ا� � ڈى � �و� �ر� � ا� �ہ � �� آ� �ں � 542 ارب رو� �� ۔� � 491 ارب را� اور 99ارب �ا� �ح � ��ں � �ا� � � �ا� � � � � ر� �ا� �ح � ��ں � �چ � �� اور �رل �� ز � � � � �۔�ء �ز � �� ں � �� آ�د� �� ف �� دوران � �اد ا� �ا� � � � � � �دا� � � � � � �ا � � ��ں � � � �� ا�ء �ا� � � �۔ ا� 27 د� � ا��ت � � � � � � اس � �� ا�� ں �۔ � �اد �ا� � � � � �ا� � �� م �� ٹ � �۔ � �اد � � � � �� ں �� م �� ا� ا� �م �ے � ادارے ا� �م � � ر�۔ � �اد ا� �ا� � � � � � �دا� � � � � � �ا � � ��ں � � � �� ا�ء �ا� � � �۔ � �ا� � ا�ر� �ل � � � � �م � �� اق � � � � �� ر�م � ر�رى �۔ � � � �� ان ��ت � �� ۔ �ا� � �� آ� اور اﷲ � وا� د� � � � ��۔

ا�م آ�د (��ہ �ا� و�+ ا�ں) �� ا� � �ں� �� ر �و� �ف � �ف �ارى � � �� ا� � ��ى دا� �� ن � �ن � �ارى �: �ف � ا�� ر �ا� اور �ح � آ�ہ �� ار د� � � �� ہ (��ى دا� ) � � �� رج � �� ، � � �� ہ آر� � ��‘ ��ں � �ا� �م � � ا� � �ا� � � �� ے �، �� ا�� ا�م f)1)� � � اور �� د� �اہ اُن � �� ر� ، آ� � آر� 260 � � � ��ى دا� � � �� ازاں 22 � � �ا� � �� د�� ا دى۔ دوران �� ا�� وزارت دا� � �� ا�ر‘ �� ر�رٹ � � �� ر�رٹ،�ا�ں � �� اور ��ت � �م د�و�ات �� ا� � � � د �� ۔ �ا� � � اس � ��ں د�ع �� ا� �دى �۔ � �� ا� و� 237�ت � � ر�رٹ � �� ر�رٹ 11�ت � � � � �ا�ں � ��ت 96�ت � �� ، 28�ا�ں � �� اور ��ت � �د�ں � �� ت � �� ۔ ا�م � � �� 10�ا�ں � ��ت � �� اور �ح � در�ا� دا� � � � � دو ا�� ا�ں � ا� ا� 2014 � 15 � اور ا�� ڈا�� ا� آ� اے � �� اور � � � � ڈا�� ا� آ� اے � � �زا � �اج ا�، �� ر�ل، � �� ، �د ا��ن، � ا�، �ج � �ن، �� ، � ا� �اد �� ۔ � � �ب � ��ا� � � ��ہ �ر اور � �ور � � � � ر� �� ا� � �و� �ف �ارى � � �� ا�� ا�م � � وزارت دا� � �� ر�رٹ � �ا�ں � ��ت اور د� د�و�ات �ا� � � � � �ا� � �م د�و�ات � ا� �� ر�رٹ �ا� ر�رڈ � � �� ا� �� و� �ف � و� � �ا� � دى۔ دوران �� ا�م � � ا� در�ا� دا� �� ا�ر � � وزارت دا� � ر�رٹ � 26�اہ � �� دو �ا�ں � � � �اد 28 � �� ان � � ا� آ� اے � 18�ا�ں � ��ت � � � � �� 8 �ا�ں � �اح اور ��ت � �� ، اس � �وہ دو اور �م � �� ان � �اد 10� � � ۔ ا�م � � �ا� � ا�� آ� �اہ آ� � �ا� ا� � �� در �ے۔ اس � � � �ب � ا�ر � � دو �ا�ں � ا�� ر � �ں �� ۔ ا س � ا�م � � � � � ��ن اس �ت � ا�زت د� � � � � �� ح � �� ۔ و� د�ع ��رى �� ت � �� ا�ر � � �ارى � � � � �� ہ � � � � �ا� � ��ى �ورى � ا� f)1)�� ہ ��ى دا� � �ا� ا� �ن اور �ح � � �ے آ� � آر� 260 � �� ا�� ہ � �م ��ى � �� اب � �رج � � ��۔ ا� � � ��ى دا� � �ا� � � � ا�اض ا�� ا�ں � �� ى دا� � �م ��د � �ا ا� �� ورت � اس � � � �ب � ر�ر� د �� ہ � � � اور �� د� �اہ ُان � �� ر�، ا� �ا� � �� ے � ور� �� رج � �� ۔ �ا� � دو�ں �� آد� � � و� �ا� �� م د�و�ات � ��ہ � �۔ و� � � ا�م � � � � � �ى �� ہ (��ى دا�) � �ت �� وہ 22� � �ا� � � ��۔ ر�رٹ � ا� آ� اے � 3 �� ا�� ذ� دارى �و� �ف � �� ۔ �ء �ز اور ا� ا� آ� � �� ر�رٹ � � � � � �و� �ف � �� ا�ام �ر آر� � �� ۔ ا�� ن � �و� �ف � د� �، �م �ا�ں � �و� �ف �� ورت � ا�ر � �۔ �د�ں � �� ت � � �۔ ر�رٹ � �� م �ا�ن � �و� �ف � �� م � ا�ر � �۔ �ا�ں � �� و� �ف � � �� ا�ا�ت � ان � �� ۔ �� ا�� زادہ، �� ا�ر� �ل � �ا�م، �� ر� �ب �� ل، �ر� �ھ ڈا� �ت ا�د � �ف � �� ا�ام � �ا� � ا� �� ا�ر � اور �� ا�ر � �۔ ر�رٹ � �� دو �� 2007ء �� ا�س � �ا � � � � �و� �ف � و�ء � د�ى � � اس ا�س � � �� ا�� ۔ �� ر�رٹ � �� و� �ف � �� را� � � � �� و� �ف � �ف � ا� آ� اے � � � �اب د� � �� ر � �ر � وہ � � � � �� ۔ �و� �ف � �ن �� ن ر�رڈ � �ا�۔ ا�ا�ى � � �� ف � �ڑ � � ان � �م اى � ا� � ڈا� � � وزارت دا� � ر�ع � �۔ ر�رٹ � �� وزارت د�ع اور � ا� � � � �� ا�� ر�رڈ � �۔ ا�ا�ى � � دوران � �� رٹ � � � ا�ر �۔ �� ف � �و� � �دار � ��ہ � � � �رش � �۔ �ارى � � �� آ� �ا� � � � � ۔

� � ا�م آ�د (��ہ �ا� و�+ ا�ں) � � �ق � �� آ� و ��ن � �� ل � ا�ں � �ق � �ا� � � �� ، � ا�ں � �� رس �� ن � �� ا�زت � دى � �، �� ن � �� ، �چ � � �ر ان � � �� ۔ �رى �� ہ � ر� �، � �� د � ا�ں � �ا� � ا�ا�ت ا�ر� � � �� ۔ ا�ں � �ر� �� رٹ � �� ا�ں � � ا� � �ں � دو�ں �� ں � � �وں � �د� � �ا� � ا�ا�ت ا�� ۔ �ا� اس �ت � � ��ہ � ر� � � ا�ں � � �� ن �� : � � � � �� رس �� ذر� � ان � � �ا� � ��، ا�ں � ا�� ا�وو� �ل �ھ � �ن � ا�ں اور ان � �س � ��ت � � �� آ� ��ن � �رروا� �� د � � � �� ا�ر �� 295� �� م � ا� ا��ت � ��ت � ا�راج �ں � � ��؟ آپ � �ء آ� � آپ � ��ن � � �؟ �� رٹ � �ور �چ �، �ش �� ا� و� د�، ا�ں � �ق اور �و� و� ا�ك � � �� ت � �� ا� � � � �ى � دى �۔ �ا� � � � �و� � � � �

�� و�ء � �ا� �ون �ر �د�۔ �ا� � � ھ � ا�ں � �س ��ت � � �� اور �د � � � 6��ت � �ا� � آ� � �ھ � ا� � 2014 � 14 � � ر� ر�رٹ � � � �۔ �ا� � �ھ �� رٹ � � د� � � ا�ں � ��ت � � � ان � �و� و� ا�ك � د� �ل � � �� ر � ��۔ �ا� � �� رى �� ب اور � � � ا�وو� �ل � ا�ں � �ق، �دى ا�ات ر��، در� �� وہ ا�ں اور � � ان � �س ��ت � �� ا� �� ا� � ا� �ر � ر�ر� � �� ا� � � � � وہ ا� �ر�ت اور �و� ��ى �ر � �ا� � � ��، �ا� ان � ��ہ � � اس � رو� � ا��ت �رى �ے �۔ ا�ں � ��ے ر� �ر � �� ا�ں � ��ر �ت � �� ، اس و� � �ر�ر، �ڑ��، � اور �ا� � � �ر� � � ��ں � �روں � � �� اور �روں �آگ �� اس � �و�د ا� وا�ت � � �� ا� � � � اور � � �ف ا� آ� آر درج � � �۔ �ا� � �ھ � �روں � �ر آ� �� وا� ا�اد �ف ��ت درج � � �� ا�ر �� ۔ �ا� � ا�ر � ا�� ا�ر� �ل � �ہ � �ا� � �� ا� �� ا� � � ا� آ� آر درج � � �۔

ا�م آ�د (��ہ ��+ �ء �ز) �� رٹ � آ� � �ں � �ا� � �� دوران وا� � � � آ� � � �ام � �� ق � �ا� �ام � �ا� �ور�ت �رى �� ا� � �� ور � � ا�م � � �، �ك � �� وا� ��ں � ��ں �� دى �� ، آ� �ور�ت �رى � � � � اس � ا�ات � آ� ذ� دارى � ا� � � � � ذ� � ر� ��۔ �ا� � و�� اور �� ں � �ا� � � � 20 � � �� ام � آ� � د� �دى �ورت � ا�ء � �ا� � � � �� ، �ام � �ا� �ور�ت �رى �� اور �دى ��ت � �ا� �� ذ� دارى � ا� وہ �رى � � � � � دے۔ �ا� � ا�� ا�ر� �ل � � دے: �� رٹ �ا� � � � آ�ہ �� وہ � � �� ا� �� اور و�� آ� � آر�14،9اور 38 � � درآ � � � �� اس � ا�ات � ��۔ � �رڈر �ا� و� � �ون � آ�، �م، �د اور ��ں � د� ا�ء � � � ر� �۔ �� اداروں � �ے �� آ ر� � �ت �ؓ � �ل � � ا� در�� د� � � � �ك � �س � � �� وہ اس � ذ� دار ��۔ �� ہ �� ا� �م � �� آ �۔ �� د�� 2014 � 14 �ا� � آ�ہ � � �� ى �ك � � �ے �۔ � � ا�� ر� ��ن � � � ا� ��ن � ا� �ں � �ك � �� د�۔ � �اد ا� �ا� � � �ہ � ا�ر � � �ام � �� ر� � آ� ز�� د� �، رو� � � � � ز�� ظ ��۔ �ڈ �ر� � � � ا� �ام � 2350 � ر� � �۔ � �ہ � � � ��ں � �ڈ �ر� �� راك � � � �� ا�� رڈ � � �اد ا� �ا� � � � 2350 �ر� �ف �� ورت � آر� 9 اور،13، 38� �ھ �۔ � �ہ � آر� 38 �� ام � �دى �ق �ا� �� م � � �ار � � � آر� � � ��د � 1973ء � � � اس � � �ں � � ر�۔ � �اد ا� �ا� � � � �رے �س و�� 140 رو� � آ� �� ان ��ں � � � � �� ۔ �� ڈ �ر� � � � ا�ام �۔ � �راك � ��ى � �� ڈ �ر� � �� ا�� ور�ت � ��د� � �� ۔دو�ا � ا�� ور�ت �� ۔ � �ار � ا�ر � � � � � آ� � ��۔ � �اد � � � �� م � � �� ں � ان � �ت �� آ� � ر� � � � � � � � � آپ � �� ر� � آ� � � �� ل �ل � ز�دہ � ا� ا� �ے �� اور اس � � � �م �� راك � �� 8� �� 65 � �� ا�ل � � ر� � �� اد � � � � � �� ا�ر �� ۔ ��ر� � �م � �� دا� و�ں � اور � آ� � آپ �ر و�� ى �� آپ � ا�اد و �ر �� ے �� م �� ۔ ��ں � ا�وو� �ل � � � �۔ آپ �ا� � �� ں � �م � �� ر� � �رى � �� ذ� دارى � � �ں � �� اب � �۔ � �� د� � � د� ��ں � �� ا�زت � دى � �� ى دا� � �ر� �ا� �� ا�ر � د�۔ � �اد � � � ا� �ى � آ� � �ڑا 11 � � � ر� � � �� ر ،�� اور دوردراز ��ں � � � ر� � �۔ ��ى � �� ر� � ا��وں � و� � ا�� ا� �رہ و� � ا� �رش � �� م ،�رہ اور د� ا� �� م �� ۔ ڈى � اوز �م ا��ت � �� ۔ �ا� � ا�وو� �ل �ھ � �م ��د� � � � �� اس � ز�دہ �� دے ر�۔ �� آ� � �ا� � �� ا� وز� � � � �ڈ �ر� 50 � � � � �ا� � ا�ر � � � اس � � � �ح �� ۔ � �ار ا� � � � �� اداروں � �ے �� آ� � ۔ ��ر � �اس � �� و� � �۔ � �اد � � � و�ق � �� وہ � �� ۔ �� ا�ا�ت آپ � � �۔ ��ى � � � �ر� �ر� � �� آ �� ۔ � �ار � � � �ں � � �� دى �� ۔ � �اد � � آج � � �� دور � �� رڈ � ��ان � � � � � ۔� �ار � �ارہ � �، 18 �وڑ �ام � ��د� � ا� � �� آ� � � � � � �� ا�ا�ت �� ا�ر � � � � � � � � � �� ر� � اور � � � � ��ى �راك � � � وہ ذا� را� � �� اد � � � ذا� � �� را� � ��۔ ا�ں � � � � � � � � � ا� �دار � آپ � ر�رٹ د�� گ � � �� ۔ ��ى �راك � � � ��ن وہ � � � � ار�ں �� وا� � �� ى � �م �� ر� � اور � رو� �� وا� � ا� ر� � �م �� ر� �۔ ��ى �ڈ � � � ا� � و� د� �� ا� � ز�دہ و� د� � ا�ر � د�۔ �ا� � ا�� ا�ر� �ل � ا�ر � � وہ �� آ� � �� ام � �دى �ق �ا� � � � �۔ � �� ں � �� ر� �۔ �رے � � آ� � �ا� � د� ٰى در� �، � �� دى ا�� ق � �� ہ � د� ر� � �� ى �رروا� � ر� � � اب � � ا� آ� ذ� دارى �رى �� ۔ � �ار � � � � اداروں � ��وا� � � � �� ا �� ا� �ور� � � �� ۔ �� رى ا� �ورت �رى � �� ا� �ردو�ش �ں �آ� � �� ۔

��ر (و�� ر �� + �ا� و� ر�رٹ + ا�ں) ��ر �� رٹ � � � � � ��ل � � ا� اے 122 ��ر � وو�ں � ر�رڈ � دو�رہ � � �� آرا� � : �ان � و�� ف دا� در�ا� �� وا� ا� � � �ا د� �۔ �� ا� � �� آرا� � وا� � �ان �ن � �رت �ل ��۔ � � � � � �ل‘ ا� �ا� وا� �ں � �� ان �ن � �� 7� � ��رٹ � �� آرا� � �� ى �اب � �ا� � � � اس وا� � �� ا�س اور �رت � �۔ �اب � �ں� �ا� � �� آرا� � �� ا�ف � �ر� � و� �� وا� ا�� ۔ �� ا�ف �ا�ں � دل � ا�ام �� : ��رٹ �۔ �� و� � � اور � � � ان � � �� ۔ �� رٹ � �ا� �م � � � ا� � � ر� ��۔ و�� ا� و� � � ا�اد � �� آرا� � �۔ �ا� � �ار د� � وا� � ا� � � � �� ا�ں � ا�ام � ��۔ �ا� ��ت � � � ��ن � �� ۔ �ا� � �ار د� � ر�� ا� �د � � �ل � � � � � اس � � در�ا� دى �� در�ا� �ان �ن � دس روز � د� �� 2014 � 13 � وہ �� دا� � �۔ �ا� � �� ا�ں � � � ��ت � �� اس � وہ ا��ت � ��ت � ا� � ��۔ در�ا� �ار �دار ا�ز �دق

� و� � � � ا� ر�رڈ � دو�ر � � ا�اض � �� اب ر�� ا� � � � � �۔ �ان �ن � و� � � � ر�� ا� �� وہ ا� �

� � دو�رہ � � ��ت د�۔ �ا� � �� ا� � � �ا� �� ا� � � اس �� و�� ا� دو�رہ � � �ا� � ر�� ا� � ��ت �� رٹ � در�ا� � �� ۔ اے ا� ا� اور �ء �ز � �� ل � � � �� ں � �� ا� �ر�ں � �ا� آداب ��۔ آ�ہ ا� وا�ت رو� �� ں �� ۔ � � � ا� � � � ا� � � � د� � وہ �� د� �ا� � ا� � � � د� � وہ �� و�� ا� ��ہ �ر �� م ا� ر�ڈ � �� ل � �� د�۔ ا� ا� � �� ڈ� ا� اور � � �م ر�رڈ � �� ل � �ا� �ے � �ا س � � � � � ��ر �� رٹ � �� در�ا� دا� � ��۔ � � ��ر �� رٹ � �ان �ن � � � �� و� � � آ� د� � ا� وہ وا� ر�رڈ � ا� �ا� �� وہ � �� ا� � � � د� �، ا� �� ا�� ا�ر� � ا� اے 122 � ر�رڈ � �� ا�۔ �ان �ن � و� ا� او� ا�وو� � �ا� � آ� �ل �� ر �� رٹ � � ��ل � �� ا� � � وا� � �� از�� ہ � ��۔ � � � � � �ڈ� ا� ا� �رغ � � �ر �ر � �م ��۔ �م ��ں � �� در�ا� آ� � اس � �� وہ ا� �ڈ� ا� د� � ا��ت �ا� � � �ڈ� ا� ا� ��ں � �وف � اس � اب وہ � �م دو�رہ � � �۔ � � � �� ا�ف � و� � � � ا� � � ا�د �� ں � ا��ت �ا� ان � �� ا� رو� � � وہ ا� او� �� وا� ا�ا�ت � د�ع � ��۔ ا� ا� آ� � �� دار ا�ز �دق � و� � �� ا� � � �� ا�ف � �� ان �ن � � ا� اے 122 � ر�رڈ � �� ا�زت دى � �� ن � � ا��ت � � ر�� ا� � �دار � �� ۔ �ان �ن � و� � �� ا�ر � � ر�� ا� ر�رڈ � �� اس �ا� � � ا� اے 124 � �ل ��د �۔ ر�� ا� �� وہ ا� � � � دو�رہ � � ��ت � د�۔ � � � �ار د� � آپ ر�� ا�وں � ا�ا�ت � �� ا� � �� ا� � آپ � � � � ا�� اس � �و�د ر�� ا�وں � ا�ا�ت �� ر� �۔ � � � � � �� ا� � � در�ا� � � �د � ر�� ا�وں � ��ت دى � ور� �رے �ڈ� � ا� ا� �رغ � �۔ �ا�ں � ��ں � �اد � �ب � �� ز� �� ۔ ر�� ا�وں � �ف آپ � آج � ا� در�ا� � دى � ا�ا�ت � ر� �، � � � �ت �، � ان �وں � � �� ۔

ا�م آ�د(�� ر+ ا�ں) � � �ى � � ا�اد د� �دى � �ا� � � � � ا� ا� � � �و� �ف � آ� � ان � ��ں � �� ۔ �� ى � : ا� � � �ف � �ر � و� � �ا� � �� ان � �� درد � �� وہ �ا� � � � ��۔ �ا� � �و� �ف � ا� روز آ� � ��ں � �� : �ا� � � �ا� � ��ى � ا� د��۔ ا�اد د� �دى � �ا� � � � �ف � � � �� ر�ر� د� �� ف � � � � � � �ا� � � �۔ �ا� � � � � �۔ �م ��ى � ا�ر �� ۔ �ف � و� � �ا� � �� و� �ف � ر�ھ � �ى � �� اور �ا� � ز��ج �ا� و� �۔ ڈا�وں � �ف � آ�� رہ د� �۔ و� ا�� در�ا� � �� درد ا� �ا �ض � � �� ر �ا� � � آ �۔ � 09 � 2014 � � ر�ر� د �� ا� �رى � � � �۔ �ا� � �ف � 23� � � �رت � � � �۔

��ر (و�� ر ��) � � ��ر �� رٹ � � � ��ل � � �رى � روك �م، � � � اور اوور � � ��ت �ول �� ا� � �ہ � �ڈ�� ر� �‘ آ�ى �� ا� � � � �� و�� آ�ى �� د� �� ر �ن � �ى � دى۔ �� ا� � در�ا� � �� ۔ � � � � د� �‘ �� دى ��: � � �ڈ �� دہ � �م اور ��ے � � �ہ � �، � � �� ا� � �� آ�ى �� دے ر� �۔ �� ا� � �ار د� � ا�س �� رى � �� ۔ وا�ا � و� �ا� �رق ر� � � � � �� رى � ر� � اور �ڈ �� دورا� � ز�دہ �۔ � ��ر ��رٹ � � � � � ا�ر � � �� آپ � �ن � � � �؟ � � � � � ��ے � �� اوار � ا�� ڈ�� ا� و� ��۔ �ا� �رق ر� � �� د ا��ى � دى �� وا� � � �� ڈ�� ۔ � � � ر�ر� د� �� ڈ�� دہ � �م اور ��ے � � �ہ � �۔ � �رف � ا� � � �� اس � �دى �ورت � �را � �۔ �ا� ��ں � �دى �ق � � � �رت � 2014 � 09 �� ۔ ر�رڈ � �� ر ر�� اور � ر�� د �۔ ا� �د � و� � اوور � � ر� �۔ �� ا� � �ار د� � � � � � �ا� � � �� ۔ ��ں � � � � � � � اور �ر � � � � � �� ۔ در�ا� �ار � ا� �� ا�ر � � �ا� � � �� و�د �� ڈ�� ا�ا�ت � � ر�۔ �ا� � � �� ں � �رڈ آف ڈا��ز � ��ں، � � � اور اوور � رو� � �ا� � �ا� � � � درآ � � آ�ى �� د� �� ر �ن � �ى � دى۔

��ر (و�� ر ��) � � ��ر ��رٹ � � � � ��ل � ��ر � �� ا� � � ا� اے 122 � وو�ں � ر�رڈ � دو�رہ �� ل � � �ان � ��ر ��رٹ آ�‘ �ر�ں � �� 12 � � �ى �� آرا� � ��ن �� ا�ف � ��اہ �ان �ن � ��ى و�� ۔ ا� اے 122� ا�� ہ �� آرا�‘ � �ٹ �‘ � � � � �ا� � ا� �� د �ان �ن � در�ا� � �� رو� � � �� ا� � � �دار ا�ز �دق � � � �ان �ن � � �� ۔ �ا� �� دار ا�ز �دق � � � �ان �ن � �اب دا� �� رى � � �۔ اس � � � �� ان �ن � �ا� � �ا� � دروازے � �ن: � � � � � � آ� � اس �� ر�ں � �رو� اور د� � � � � �ا� � اُ� � � � � � اس وا� � �ان �ن � 12� � ��ى و�� آ� � ��اہ � 12 � � ��ى � � � � �۔ � � � �� ان �ن � ��ر ��رٹ آ� � � � �ر� � � � د� � �۔ �� ا�ف � ر�وں اور �ر�ں � �ى �اد �ا� �� ر� ا�� ا� � د�� ف ز�د� �ے �زى �� ر�۔ �ان �ن � �ا� �� آ� � �� و�ء � �� ر� � �ہ و�� ا� � �۔�ر�ں � د� � � �ا� ا�� ر� � � �ٹ �، �رٹ روم � ا� � �� ا واك �و � � �ا، �ہ �ا� � �� ز�دہ ا�اد �ا� و� � � � � � �۔ �ان �ن � ��ر ��رٹ آ� � �� ر�ں � �ى �اد � ��د � �ں � �ان �ن � � � اور � � �ف �� ے �زى �۔ �� ر�ں � �ہ �ا� � � � �� ر� ا�روں � ا� رو� � � �� آرا� �� اور � � ��ر ��رٹ � �ا� � دروازے 2014 � 08 � �وى �ر ��ن �۔ � � اس وا� � ا�ر �� اد�رى �ڑ � � � �ں �� ان �ن � وا� � �۔ و� � � �ا� � � � دو�رہ �� آرا� � �ان �ن � ��ى و�� دوران �� ا� � �ار د� � �ان �ن ��ان � � � �� ام � آ� �ل � �ت � �� ا� ا�ام اور و�ر � �ف ورزى � ا�زت � دى ��۔ �ان �ن � �� ا� � �� د� �� ا� اس وا� � ��ى و�� د� � � � � � � � �� ۔ آ� ا� � � �� ان �ن � آ� � �� ر� اور ��

و� ز�د� �ہ �ا� � دا� � �۔ �ر� واك �و � ا�ڑ د� ‘ �ا� � ا� دروازہ � �ڑ د� �‘�ا� � �� ل � � ا�ر �� ‘ �ان �ن �ا� � � �� آ� � ا�ز� �ر �ب ا� �ں �د ا�� اور �ان �ن � و� � ا� ا�ل � و�ں ��د � � ا�ف � �� و�ء اور �ر�ں � �� ے �زى �وع � دى۔ �ان �ن � �� ز�د� �ہ �ا� � دا� �� اور �ان �ن � � � �ہ �ا� � � �ے �� ر�۔ � � � �ان �ن � و� ا� او� � �� ہ �، �ہ �ا� �، � � �رت �ا� � �س � ��ل � �� د� �� آپ � ا� و�ء اور �ر�ں � �ول �� اس � � � � ا� � � � �، � ازاں �ان �ن � و�ء � � � � ا� � � � � �� در�ا� � � � � � �د � د�۔ � � � وا� � �� ا� � �ا وہ ا�� ا��ك �۔ �ر � � �� اور � � �ا� � ا�ام �� ۔ ا�� ا�ر� �ل � � � �ا� � �� ان �ن � �ا� � � � � � �، ان � آ� � � وا� �ا۔��ر (�� ر�ر�) �� ا�ف � �� ان �ن � � � � 11� � ڈى �ك � �وع �� وا� �� ر� � �‘ د�� ذ� داروں � �ف �رروا� � �� د� �� ‘ �� را ا�ج رو� � �ر�ں � د�ں دے ر� � ا� �� ز � آ� � � �از�� ات � دو�ر �� ‘ � � �ا� � �ں��‘ �� ا�ف � �� ا� �ر � �رى �م � � آ� �‘ د�� وا�ں � �ف آر� 6 � � � �رروا� �� ‘ ا� د�� ا��ت �� ا� ا� �� ہ �‘ � �� ا�ام �� و� آ� � اس � �� ے �ں��‘ ��ر� � ا� �ف � � � � � دو�ى �ف ا�ز� � ر� � � � وہ � � �‘ ��ن � �� ن � �ا�ات ��ب �� ‘ �ا�ا� � � ر� � � � �ہ � �� ا�ف � �ر � � �ا�ات � �رے � � �� د �ں��‘ �و� �ف � � � ��ن ا� � �� ‘ 35� �� وا� � � � � � �� ا� �� وپ � ا�� د�� ث �� ‘ �� وپ � ��دہ � � � � � � � � � �� وں �‘ � �� ا� �ف � و� � ا� ا�� وو�وں � �� ف �ا� � � ا�� ‘ � � � � � �م �ں � وو�ں � �� ا� � �ر �‘ ��ر � ا� � � ا�� وو�ں � � � ��ن � �� ن � � � ا � آ� �۔ ��ر � �رے ا�وار �� ز�ن � � � 90�ار وو�ں � �� ر�رڈ � �۔ ا� ر�� ہ � �� ب �� ان �ن � �� ا� �ل � �م ا��ت � �� وا� د�� ف ا� � اور �ا� � � دروازہ � ر� � � � ا� � � � ا�ف � � آ� �ر � � ��ں � آ� � � � � � �گ � � � �� ا�ف � �� وہ 11� � ڈى �ك � �� د� � ان � � آ �� ں �ا �۔ � � �ت وا� � د� �� ں � � � � �� ا�ام � � آ�ہ � �ا�ں�� ا�ام �� ر��ں�� ا� �ا�ا� �� آزادى � � � �� ے �� اور �� آزادى � � � � �� ۔ 11� � ا�ج � �ر� � � � �ہ � � � � � �ر� � � ا� � � � � �ر� � � � � �ت � � �� ف ا� �ا� � �ر� � آ� �� ا� � � �رك � �ے �ے ڈ� �ا� ر� �، �ر� � آ� � � �ف ا��ت �ں ا� 2013ء � � ا��ت �� ا� ا��ت � � � � �� ہ �۔ د�� و�د � آ� وا� � � ن � �� ام � � � ان ��ں � �رٹ �ر� � �ں � �م ا��ت � د�� ن وا�ں � �� د� �ا�ں � ا� ��ں � 500ارب رو� �� ڈ� � �م � � � � � � �ڈ�� د� �� ڈ� � 200ارب رو� � � � �۔ �ان �� ان � ا�� ر� �۔ � دن � � � � � � � �� اس دن � � � � � � � �م ا��ت � �� وا� د�� وپ � �ث � اس �� وپ � د�� ث �� رے � �ے �س اور � �ت �۔ �ان �ن � � � 11� � ا��ت � د�� اور ا� �� ت � ��ر �� آ�ز ��۔ �ر� �� د� � �� د�� ، �ر�ں � �رى � � رو� � � �� ے � ��، �� ا�� رے �� ا� �� ت � �رى �، ��ں � � اور �� رى �� ا� �، �� د � �رى � � ، � � �ٹ �رى �� وا�ں � �ا � � اس و� � � � �ر� � آ �۔ �� رى �� وا�ں � �ف آر� 6� � �رروا� �� ۔ �� ا� � � ا� اے 118 � ا� �� 70�ار ووٹ �� 90�ار ووٹ � �۔ � ر�� ا� � �ف � � � ��۔ اس �ح � ��ں � �ٹ �رى � � � ا� �ر �� ووٹ ڈا� � � � � �� ۔ �ان �ف 4�ں � دو�رہ � � ڈر ر� � � � � � � � � � � دو�رہ � � � �ر � ۔ � �گ �ٹ �رى � � ا�ں � آ� � ان � �� ر� � � وہ ا�ں � �رى � �� ۔ �ا� ��وں � ا�ں � �� ۔ ا�ج �را �رى � � ،� � � � � �� ر�ں � 11� � ا�ج � �� رو� � ر� �۔ ا� �ل � � � ا�ف � � �� رٹ، �ر� اور ا� �� ا�ف � �۔ 11� � �ر� �� ر� آف ڈ�� اور �� د� �۔ �� ك � � �� وا� د�� م � �� ، اب 11� � � �� ۔ �� د�� ۔ 11� � �� وا� ا�ج � � �� ا�� رى �� ا�ں � � � � � � � � وہ �ف ��ر � � ا�ج �� ا� �� ت � �رى � ان � ا�ج �رے � � � � �ف ا�م آ�د ڈى �ك � ا�ج �� ۔ ا� �ل � �� ام � � � � � ، � � �ں � � �ر� � دور �� دو �ہ ز�دہ ا�� د� � �۔ �� ڈ �� رى �۔ �ان �ن � � � � �وپ اور � ا� �دار � � ر� �۔ ا�ں � � � وہ � � ا�� د� � �� ۔

�ور (�ز ا�ں+ �ا� و� ر�رٹ) �ور ��رٹ � �� ں � �� ا� ا�اد � � � � �� ۔ �ا� �� وا� ا��ت � �� ا�اد � � �� اداروں، �و�د �� ى دا� � � � �� ا� �ف ��ز �� رى �د� � و�ق � �� وا� ��رى ا� � ��ت � ر� � � � � ��ں � �ون � �ان �: �� ا� � �� د��۔ �ور ��رٹ � � � � �� ں � اور � ا�ام ا� �ن � � ڈو�ن � � �� ا�اد � � � �� ۔ � � � � ��رى اداروں � �� ر�ر� د �� ا � �ف اور �ا� � د� �س ��، ا� �� د � � � �ث � � ا� �ا� � � � �رٹ ‘ ��رى ادارے �ا � �ف، ��،� � �� ا� �دار � �ر �� ۔ �ا� � � � � ان � ان � �روں � �رے � �� ، �� ا�اد � �ا� � � ��ل �۔ اس � �ا� � د� �س �� : � � � ڈا�� ا� ر�رٹ ��ا� � �م ا�د � ا�ر �� د �دى۔ وزارت د�ع � �� اور و�ق � �� ڈ� ا�ر� �ل � �� ى دا� � ��ہ � �ا� � ��د �۔ � � � � �ا� � ا� �ن � � � �� ا�اد آ� ا� آ� � �س ��د �۔ � �ور ��رٹ � �ور ��رٹ � ڈ� ��ى دا� � ا�ر � � �� ا�اد �ں �؟ ڈ� ��ى دا� � �ا� � �� ر� �۔ � � � اس �اب � �ا� و� ڈ� ��ى � �ا� � �� د�۔ �ور ��رٹ � ��ى دا� � � � � ��ز �� رى �د� � �� ا�اد � � و�� ا� ��۔ � � � �ات � �� 2 ا�اد � � �ات � � �� د�۔ �ھ � � 2009ء � �� ا� � �رے � �� م � � �اب � � ��۔ � � � 2014 � 07 � � � ادارے � ا� �ود � رہ � �م �� ۔ �ا � �اب د� � ا� � � �م � � � ا� �ا� � � � ��۔

ا�م آ�د (�� ر+ �ز ا�ں) ا�� ا�م آ�د � �ا�� زى � � � �م �و� �ف � ا� دن � ��ى � ا� � در�ا� �ر �� زى ر� � �: �ف � �رت � � �� 22 � � � ��۔ �م � �� اور � ��ى � ا� � در�ا�ں � �� رى �د�۔ �� روز �ا�� زى � � � �� ا�� 22 � � � �ں‘ �� ل �: � وا� � � �۔ �م �و� �ف � �� ا� و� � (ر) ا� �ہ �ا� � � �� اور �و� �ف � �� در�ا� دا� � � � � �� روز ��ى � ا� � در�ا� � ��ى � � ا� اور �� در�ا� �� ۔ �و� �ف � و� � �ا� � �� ا�ر � � �و� �ا� �ف � � �ا� �ا�� ذ� دارى �۔ ا� �ا� � � � وہ آج � � �� ، �و� �ف � �ر� دى �� وہ �م ��ت � �� ر �، ا� �ا� و� �و� �ف � � �ا � ا� ذ� دارى در�ا� �ار � � �، در�ا� �ار � و� �ا� � � � � � �ر دا� در�ا�ں � ا� � �� و� �ف � � � �ر� ��ت � اور وہ �ر �۔ در�ا� �ار � و� � ا�� و� �ف � �ا� � � ��، � � �� رت � ا� � ��ں � � � ��۔ 2014 � 04 �ا� � �� ر � آج ��ى � ا� � در�ا� �ر �� ا� �� اور � ��ى � ا� � در�ا�ں � �� رى �د�۔ ا� ا� آ� � � �� ا� � � د� � آ�ہ �ر� � �و� �ف � � �رت �ا� � � � ��۔ �� ر � �� ا�� وا� � � ر�ر� د � � � �� ر � آج � � � �� ى � ا� د� � �۔ آ�ہ �� ر �ل � � ��، ا� ��ى � � �� ۔ �ء �ز � �� ا� � �ار د� � ’’�و��ف � �ا� � آج � روز ��ى � ا� � در�ا� اس و� � �ر �ر� � � وہ � � �� ، 22 � � �� و� �ف � �رت �ا� � ا� � � � ��۔ 22 � � دو�ے � � �� ا� � � � �� ا� � �و��ف � �� ل � ��‘‘۔

ا�م آ�د (��ہ �ا� و� + آن ��) �� ا�اد � � �� دوران � � � � ا�� ا�وو� �ل �ب � � � �م �ا�س � �� ا�اد � : � اداروں � � � �� ا�ر �� ر � آپ � �ك � � � �ے ا� � �� ر� � اور آپ � �اب � � � � � �؟ �� ت � � ا�� رى � ر� � : �� ا�وو� �ل � � � ا�� 15 � � �ى �دى � �۔ ا�� 2012ء � ��ر � �� ا�اد � �ا� اور �� و� � �ا� � �� ا� �رس � �ان دو�ں ا�اد � � � � � � � � �رى �ر � �م �رم � ر�ع � � اور �ز�� اداروں � ��ى در�ا� � دى � � اب �رٹ � ان � � �� ۔ ا�� ا�وو� �ل �ب رزاق �زا � �ا� � �� ان ا�اد � � �� ا�اد � � �س � اس � � � �ا�ں � �ا� و� �ن ر�رڈ �� ل ان ا�اد � � � � �۔ آن �� ادارو ں � آ� � �� رى �ر� � � � �ا� � � � �� ‘ � � ا� � � � � ا� � �� ا�اد � � � � � ر�۔ � � ا�س ا� �� ا� � �� ۔ آپ � اس � � � � �� 2014 � 01 �۔ رزاق اے �زا � �ا� � �� ا�اد � �� رو�و ز� �� ا� �اہ � �ن ر�رڈ � �� اس � ا� � �� دى �۔ �ا� � � � اس وا� � ا� �رے �اہ � اس � �و�د اس � �� ۔

Legal Directory

GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS Advocate General Punjab Attorney General of Pakistan Lahore Panjab Lahore Punjab 0092-42-9212351 0092-42-9212315, 9212357 0092-51-92144742 Balochistan High Court DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT, LAHORE [email protected] [email protected] Www.bhc.gov.pk Www.lahore.dc.lhc.gov.pk Queatta Balochistan Lower Mall Road, Lahore 0092-81-9202077 Lahore Punjab 009281-9202784 0092 42 37354487 0092 42 99210131 DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT, Karachi Deputy Attorney General of Pakistan Www.districtcourtssindh.gos.pk Lahore Punjab N5, Malir 0092-42-9212345 Karachi Sindh 0092-21 34512424 DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT, Peshawar Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan [email protected] [email protected] Www.sessionscourtpeshawar.gov.pk Www.federalshariatcourt.gov.pk Judicial Complex, opposite PC Hotel, Khyber Road Peshawar KP Constitution Avenue G 5/2 0092-91-9210099 Islamabad ICT 0092-91-9212419 0092-51-9203091,9205911 0092-51-9203448 High Court Bar Association Peshawar High Court Bar Association Karachi Www.peshawarhighcourt.gov.pk Www.sindhhighcourt.gov.pk Law, Parliamentary Affairs & Human Rights Department, Civil Secretariat Near Passport Office Saddar & Sindh Secretariat Karachi Peshawar KP 0092-21-5689589, 5689606 0092-91-9210145

High Court Bar Association Lahore High Court Bar Association Multan Www.lhc.gov.pk Multan Punjab Shahra-e-Quaid-e-Azam 0092-61-9201195 Lahore Punjab 0092-61-9201194 0092-42-7235724, 7224734 High Court Bar Association Bahawalpur High Court Bar Association Rawalpindi Bahawalpur Punjab Rawalpindi Punjab 0092-62-2887126 0092-51-5522715, 5518432

Human Rights Commission of Pakistan Lahore High Court [email protected] Www.lhc.gov.pk Www.hrcp-web.org Shahra-e-Quaid-e-Azam Aiwan-I-Jamhoor, 107-Tipu Block New Garden Town Lahore Lahore Punjab 0092 42 99212951-66 0092 42 35838341 0092 42 35883582 Law & Parliamentary Affairs of Balochistan Law Department of KPK [email protected] [email protected] Www.balochistan.gov.pk Www.khyberpakhtunkhwa.gov Block No: 11, 2nd Floor, Civil Secretariat Zarghon Road Quetta Law, Parliamentary Affairs & Human Rights Department, Civil Secretariat Balochistan Peshawar KP 0092-81-9201020 0092-91-9210023 0092-81-9201867 0092-91-9210044 Law, Justice, Parliamentary Affairs of AJK Ministry of Defence [email protected] [email protected] Law.ajk.gov.pk Www.mod.gov.pk Law, Justice, Parliamentary Affairs Department of AJK,NULL Ministry of Defence Muzaffarabad Regional Islamabad ICT 0092-5822-921096 0092-51-9271107 0092-5822-920136 0092-51-9271113 Ministry of Law & Justice National Accountability Bureau [email protected] [email protected] Www.molaw.gov.pk Www.nab.gov.pk Pak Secretariat- S-Block National Accountability Bureau (NAB) ATTATURK AVENUE G-5/2 Islamabad Islamabad ICT ICT 0092-51-9211278 0092-51-111-622-622 0092-51-9201722 0092-51-9214502-03 National Database & Registration Authority National Trust for Population Welfare Info@nadra,gov.pk [email protected] Www.nadra.gov.pk Www.natpow.org.pk NADRA State Bank of Pakistan buildingshahrah-i-Jamhuriat, G-5/2 House# 358, Street # 37, F11/3 Islamabad ICT Islamabad ICT 0092-51-9267004-5 0092-51-111 786 100 0092-51-9217266 0092-51-9205803 Pakistan Bar Council Islamabad Pakistan Bar Council Lahore Islamabad ICT Lahore Punjab 0092-51-9206805 0092-42-7322773 0092-51-9206922

Peshawar High Court Punjab Bar Council [email protected] Lahore Punjab Www.peshawarhighcourt.gov.pk 0092-42-7244127, Khyber Road Peshawar KP 7354344

0092-91-9210149-58 0092-91-9210170 Society For Enforcement of Rule of Law Sindh High Court [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] Www.serl.pk Www.sindhhighcourt.gov.pk Near Passport Office Saddar & Sindh Society For Enforcement of Rule of Law Office No.17, 2nd Floor, Masco Secretariat Plaza, 64-W Blue Area. Islamabad ICT Karachi Sindh 0092-21-2206222 0092-21 99203151-9 0092-21-2270961 Ext. 280 0092-21 99203221, 99203224 Sindh Bar Council Standing Council Lahore Karachi Sindh 0092-427231880 0092-21-5889183 Supreme Court of Pakistan Supreme Court of Pakistan Bar Association [email protected] Www.supremecourt.gov.pk Www.supremecourt.gov.pk Constitution Avenue Constitution Avenue Islamabad ICT Islamabad ICT 0092-51-9220581-9220600 0092-51-9206247 0092-51-9213452 0092-51-9209390, 9214862

UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES Azam Chaudhary Law Associates 0 Frontier Law College Dera Ismail Khan [email protected] Frontier Law College Dera Ismail Khan KPK www.acla-law.com 0092-966710339 Azam Chaudhary Law Associates H.No.5, St. No. 9 F-8/3. Islamabad Federal 0092-51-2253310 0092-51-2260634 Frontier Law College, Peshawar, Pakistan . Luqman College of Law and Sciences Affiliated with University of Peshawar. [email protected] [email protected] www.luqmancollegeoflaw.blogspot.com www.flc.edu.pk Castle Nawab ,Allah Nawaz Khan North Circular Road, Frontier Law College, Building, Pajaggi road, peshawar city D.I.Khan KPK 0092-91-9280192 Peshawar KPK 0092- 0300 8583625 0092-91 5273511 National Defence University Pakistan Institute of Pluralism [email protected] Peace & [email protected] Institute of Pluralism, www.ndu.edu.pk Peace & Security 199-A, ST. 50, F-10/4, Shaheen Chowk, Service Road E-9 Islamabad ICT Islamabad ICT 0092-334-5415044 0092 51 9262066-8 0092 51 9263479 HUMANITARIAN ORGANIZATIONS Action for Peace and Sustainable Development AGHS Legal Aid Cell [email protected] [email protected] www.apsd.org.pk www.aghsblog.wordpress.com/contact-us/ Bangulow no C-18, Prince Town, Phase II, Qasimabad Hyderabad Sindh 131 E/1 Gulberg III Lahore Punjab 0092-334-3713566 0092-42-5763234 0092-42-5763236 Awareness on Human Rights, Social Development and Action Society Center for Peace and Development ahsas@ahsaspk.org [email protected] www.ahsaspk.org www.cpdbalochistan.org AHSAS-PK Office, Flat No. 108, 1st Floor Muzamil Square, Phase-I B-05, Shahbaz Town Phase II Quetta Balochistan Shahbaz Town Quetta Balochistan 0092-81-2832839 0092-812-302042 0092-812-302042 Centre for Peace and Civil Society Sindh Centre for Peace and Justice Pakistan [email protected] [email protected] A-89/11 gulshan-e-Sahar Wadhu wah Qasimabad Hyderabad www.cpjp.org Sindh Block no 12, DHA, Gulistan-e-Johar Karachi Sindh 0092-222-106074 0092-222-652401 0092-333-7581238 Child Rights Legal Centre Citizen Legal Aid & Complaint Cell [email protected] [email protected] www.crlc.info M-25, Raffi Shopping Mall, Main National Highway Malir Karachi Sindh House 112, Street 110, G 11/3, Islamabad Federal 0092-21-35443171 0092 51 2221657 0092 51 2221628 Criminologists' Association for Reform and Education Female Human Rights Organization [email protected] [email protected] 84, F.B.Area Block No.8 Karachi Sindh www.fehroswatpk.org, 0092-21-6329898 0092-21-4968510 www.wbcpk.com House No 1448 st#33 G11/2 Islamabad Federal 0092-301-8054181 Fundamental Human Rights & Rural Development Association Global Peace Pioneers [email protected] [email protected] www.fhrrda.org www.globalpeace.net.pk Mashori house ward no 4, Golrachi Taluka Golrachi House #351, Street #15, Sector G-10/2 Islamabad ICT Badin Sindh 0092-297-725509 0092-297-853401 HUMAN RIGHTS SOCIETY OF PAKISTAN International Human Rights Observer [email protected] [email protected] Ahmed Arcade, 161-Ferozepur Rd Lahore Punjab www.ihro.org.pk 0092-42 37570257 0092-42 37570256 Central Secretariat House No 921, Street No 80, Sector I-8/3 Islamabad Federal 0092-51 443 0150 0092-51- 443 5861 Iqbalian Commission For Human Rights Just Peace Initiatives Iqbalian Commission For Human Rights Chember No.211 Zila kachehri. [email protected] Sialkot Punjab www.justpeaceint.org 0092-432-595070 T-772 Hassan Street, Backside VIP Guest House, Old Bara Road, University

Town, Peshawar KPK 0092-5703785 0092-5845571 Justice & Peace Commission Justice & Peace Commission [email protected] [email protected] Justice & Peace Commission Naqshband Colony, ward No 21,House Justice & Peace Commission Naqshband Colony, ward No 21,House No1027/D-1,G.P.O.Box No 175. Multan Punjab No1027/D-1,G.P.O.Box No 175. Multan Punjab 0092-61-220493 0092-61-220580 0092-61-220493 0092-61-220580 LAWYERS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS & LEGAL AID LAWYERS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS & LEGAL AID #702, 7th Floor, Muhammadi HouseI.I. Chundrigar Road Sindh #702, 7th Floor, Muhammadi HouseI.I. Chundrigar Road Karachi Sindh 0092-21 0092-21 32412978 0092-21 32417262 32412978 0092-21 32417262 Manangment And Governance Network Society National Commission for Justice and Peace [email protected] [email protected] www.magnets.org.pk E-64/A, St #8, Officers Colony Walton Road Punjab Milatary Road Bi-pass Near Blue line Bus Stop Bashirabad Sukkur 0092-423-6668692 0092-423-6655549 Sindh 0092-71-5633832 0092-715633832 National Commission for Justice and Peace Organization for Development and Peace [email protected] [email protected] E-64/A, St #8, Officers Colony Walton Road Lahore Punjab www.odpmpk.org 0092-423-6668692 0092-423-6655549 House # 1020/B, Street No :2, Naqshband Colony, Khanewal Road Multan Punjab 0092-61-6018513 0092-61-6521694 Organization for Peace and Development Pakistan International Human Rights Organization [email protected] [email protected] www.opdpeace.org www.pihro.org/contact.php House # 100, Street # 10, B-Block, Near Stitch Craft Factory, 12-D, 2nd Floor, Rehmat Plaza, Nizam-ud-Din Road , Blue Area Islamabad Youhanabad, Feroze Pur Road Lahore Punjab Federal 0092-42-5270207, 0092-42-5027814 0092-42-5270207 0092-51-2828791 0092-51-2872092 Pakistan International Peace and Human Rights Organization Pakistan International Peace and Human Rights Organization [email protected] [email protected] www.piphro.org www.piphro.org P.O Nindo Shaher Badin Sindh P.O Nindo Shaher Badin Sindh 0092-297-745924 0092-297-745924 Peace & Development Foundation Peace & Development Foundation KPK [email protected] [email protected] 126-F/ A-1, Gulistan Colony,Old Bahawalpur Road, Multan Punjab www.pdfpk.org 0092 345 727 2269 PDF,Offoc Opp.Deans Apparments Old Bara Road Uniersity Town. Peshawar KPK 0092-91-5701424 Peace and Development Forum Peace and Development Organization [email protected] [email protected] Thall Road near Degree college (M) Hangu City HANGU KPK www.pado.org.pk 0092-925-525670 0092-925-620230 House 15 B(4), Old Jamrud Road, University Town, Peshawar NULL KPK 0092-300-5928964 Peace by Youth Sindh Peace Education and Development [email protected] [email protected] www.py.org.pk www.pead.org.pk Mangria Colony, Near Old NIC Office, Sheedi Muhallah P.O Box 2524 GPO Islamabad ICT Jacobabad Sindh 0092-345-5348018 0092-333-3405055 0092-722-654803 Peace Foundation Peace Heart Foundation [email protected] [email protected] www.peacefoundation-pak.org www.phfpak.com House No.151, Pak Colony, Umer Kot Raod Mirpurkhas Sindh\0092-233- P.O Nindo Shaher, Near Abra House Nindo Shaher Badin Sindh 876239 0092-233-876239 0092-297-738918 0092-297-738918 Peace Social Welfare and Educational Organization Peace Through Prosperity [email protected] [email protected] www.peacengo.webs.com www.bringptp.com VIP Road ,Lahori Muhallah Larkana NULL Sindh Ho.No.107 St# 49 F11/3 Islamabad ICT 0092-74-4040035 051 8437489 PEACE WorldWide SAHER Arts For Peace And Sustainable Development Balochistan [email protected] [email protected] www.pww.org.pk Quetta Road Dera AllahYar PEACE WorldWide P.O Box # 1835, GP Jafferabad Balochistan Islamabad ICT 0092-838-510938 0092-838-510448 0092 51 410 2021 Society for Advocacy, Management and Justice Society for Human Rights and Prisoner's Aid [email protected] [email protected] www.samajorg.page.tl www.sharp-pakistan.org samaj organization near waqar medical Tahsil Road Dera Allah Yar H # 279-A Nazim-Ud-Din Road, sector F 10/1 Jaffarabad Balochistan Islamabad ICT 00923453821043/ 0838510750 0092-51-221-1621 0092-51-221 2773 Society for Mobilization, Advocacy and Justice Balochistan Society for Peace Building Research and Integration of Normative Gender [email protected] www.smaajpk.org [email protected] House No: 9 – C Afzal Banglows Sipiny Road Quetta Balochistan www.spring.btck.co.uk 0092-081-2824670 0092-81-2824670 SPRING INTERNATIONAL 53 C-III, Gul Mohar Lane, Opposite to UNHCR Office, University Town, Peshawar KPK 0092-345 6789389 Society for the Advancement of Nature, Justice & Health South Asia Forum for Human Rights – Pakistan [email protected] D-3/1, Block 7, KDA Scheme 5, Clifton Karachi Sindh Pakistan Public School, Gurmani Town, Tehsil Kot Addu 0092-21-35830418 Muzaffargarh Punjab 0092-66-2040598 Sustainable Peace and Development Organization Youth Commission for Human Rights [email protected] [email protected] www.spado.org.pk F-6, Capri Center, Firdos Market, Gulberg-3 / House No.122, St.3, PADO (Head Office) House No: 277, Street 6, F 10/3 Officers Colony, Cavalry Ground, Lahore Cantonment Lahore Punjab Islamabad Federal 0092-42-5850104 0092-51-2293658,

ALHASAN SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. Landline: +92.51.282.0449/ +92.51.835.9288 Fax: +92.51.835.9287 Email: [email protected] Website: www.alhasan.com http://www.facebook.com/alhasan.com