DOCSLIB.ORG

Prolonged Connections: the Rise of the Extended Family in Nineteenth

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prolonged Connections: the Rise of the Extended Family in Nineteenth rlnd Cnntn Sl rph Seies Eios ois . Sesige ames A. Swee Ka E. aeue Cee o emogay a Ecoogy Uiesiy o WiscosiMaiso rdrl tr f th 40 Cn f n nd pltn oe M. ekis pltn Grth nd En vlpnt: Issues a Eiece Eie y . Gae oso a oa . ee hlnd prdtv vltn: ai eiiy ecie i a iWo Seig o Koe, Aica Camaiiog, a io eaaya rlnd Cnntn: e ise o e Eee amiy i ieeeCeuy Ega a Ameica See ugges rlnd Cnntn h o e Extndd l n ntnthCntr Enlnd nd Ar See ugges h Unvrt f Wnn r blhd 8 h Unvrt f Wnn r 4 rth Mrr Strt Mdn, Wnn h Unvrt f Wnn r, td. Gr Strt ndn WCE 6A, Enlnd Cprht © 8 h rd f nt f th Unvrt f Wnn St All rht rrvd rt prntn rntd n th Untd Stt f Ar r C CI nfrtn th lphn IS 0200 lth, 02046 ppr nnrdnt xtndd n rp Cntnt Preface xvii 1 The Rise of the Extended Family in the Nineteenth Century 3 2 The Economics of the Family: Some Theoretical Considerations 13 rdtnl Sll Intrprttn 13 h En 6 Exhn hr 20 En hr nd vl f Anl 22 En Anl nd ntrl tr 2 h ttn f En Anl 24 trl Intrprttn 2 Cnln 2 v Cntnt 3 Evidence on the Economics of Extended-Family Structure 0 En Stt nd Extnddl Strtr 31 En pndn nd th Extndd l 42 En Exhn nd Extnddl Strtr 4 Cnln 57 4 Approaches to the Demography of the Extended Family 60 hrtl Cndrtn 60 Anlt Mdl f Extnddl Strtr 6 Sltn Apprh 71 h SOCSIM rph Mrltn Mdl 4 5 Analytic Strategies 84 vl f Mrnt nd dntl rpnt 84 h Whppr Aptn 8 h Stndrd rpnt Apprh 2 U f pthtl l th MOMSIM 02 Cnln 0 6 Simulation Results 06 h Stndrd rpnt lt 0 pthtl l nd Stl Strtr 119 Cnln 2 Contents ix Conclusion 127 Appendix A: Notes on the Measurement of Historical Family Structure 139 l Extnn vr hld Extnn 139 hld dhp nd l Strtr 40 h Unt f Mrnt 42 h Efft f Intrvnn rbl 4 Appendix B: Data and Setting 0 Appendix C: MOMSIM: An Individual-Level Model of Demography and Kinship 6 Gnrl Chrtrt f th Mdl 157 Inpt t nd Alltn rdr 60 Strt fr Ann Chrtrt 6 Aptn n Annt f Indvdl Chrtrt 2 Ar f th ftr Alltn 4 Ornztn f th Mdl 175 h b rjtn Mdl 8 h MOMSIM Adjtnt hn 82 Cnln 84 x Cntnt Appndx : h Efft f rph n Extnddl Strtr 8 h 00 Stndrd rpnt 86 Mrtl ttrn nd Stndrd rpnt 191 Mrtlt, rtlt, nd Stndrd rpnt 8 Anl thrh pthtl l 20 Cnln 206 Appndx E: Mrr nd Cl ttrn f Extnddl Strtr 208 rph nd Extndd l n nhr 208 rtl nd rzntl Extnn 2 pr nd rzntl Extnn 24 dhp nd rtl Extnn 26 Cnln 2 Appndx : Mltvrt Anl 220 blrph 2 Indx 2 r .. rnt f hld Cntnn Extndd Kn: Enlnd nd Ar, 60084 .2. Mn br f Extndd Kn pr 00 hld: Enlnd, 600 .. rnt f rn dn th Extndd Kn, b Op tnl Cl: Er Cnt, 8 4 .2. rnt f rn dn th Extndd Kn, b Op tnl Cl: nhr n, 8 .. rnt f rn dn th Extndd Kn, b l f r: Er Cnt, 8 8 .4. Stndrdzd rnt f rn dn th Extndd Kn, b l f lln: Er Cnt, 8 40 .. Enpndn t f Extndd l, Inldn nd Exldn Extndd Kn, b A f l d: Er Cnt nd nhr n, 8 46 .6. rnt f Mrnt dn n Extndd l, b Yr Spnt ll: Er Cnt, 8 C.. Splfd lhrt fr ftr Sbrtn 0 C.2. Mn br f Srvvn Chldrn, b A f Mthr: Untd Stt, 00, nd Sltd pltn 6 x x r C.. rnt f Wn th On r Mr Srvvn Chldrn, b A f Mthr: Untd Stt, 00, nd Sltd pltn C.4. Expl f Sltd Kn Grp .. rnt Evr Mrrd, b A nd Sx: Mrr n 0 bl 1.1. Extnddl hld fr lt n Whh Sr t Ar Avlbl .. Indvdl dn th Extndd ltv, Er Cnt, 8 .2. Efft f th Inln f Extndd ltv n th l Enpndn t 4 .. Efft f th Inln f Extndd ltv n th l Enpndn t, b Optnl Cl, Er Cnt, 880 44 .4. h vn Arrnnt f Mthr nd Wrn Wn 48 .. vn Arrnnt nd Mlthhld lln, Er Cnt, 8 2 .6. Wrd nt nd rnt dn th Extndd ltv, ffl, 8 .. rnt f Indvdl th Avlbl Kn f Sltd p, Untd Stt, 00 4 .2. rnt f Indvdl Atll dn th Kn f Sltd p, Untd Stt, 00 4 .. rpnt fr Indvdl t d th Kn f Sltd p, Untd Stt, 00 6.. rph rtr fr Sltn n: rndtrl n nd Stndrd pltn xv bl 6.2. rndtrl nd Stndrd Sltn n: Mr f l Strtr, An 00 Stndrd rpnt 2 6.. rph rtr fr Sltn n: MdntthCntr n nd Stndrd pltn 6.4. MdntthCntr nd Stndrd Sltn n: Mr f l Strtr, An 00 Stndrd rpnt 6 6.. rph rtr fr Sltn n: Exrtd hrd Wrld n nd Stndrd pltn 6.6. Exrtd hrd Wrld nd Stndrd Sltn n: Mr f l Strtr, An 00 Stndrd rpnt 8 6.. Mr f Stl Strtr, An St pthtl l nd E rph Cndtn 2 6.8. Mr f Stl Strtr, An St pthtl l: Cbntn rph Mdl 24 A.. Mr f Extndd l Strtr fr pthtl pltn, An Cntnt l Sz 4 A.2. Mr f Extndd l Strtr fr pthtl pltn, An rbl l Sz 4 C. rprtn f pltn Evr Mrrd, b A nd Sx, Untd Stt, 00 6 C.2. Chrtrt fr pthtl Kn Grp 80 .. dntl rpnt fr Mjr Kn Grp n 00 88 .2. rph rtr f Mrr n .. Mrr n: Mr f l Strtr, An 00 Stndrd rpnt .4. Avlblt f Mthr 4 .. Avlblt f Str .6. rph rtr f rnt Mrrn n .. Efft f rnt vr Mrrn n l Strtr, An 00 Stndrd rpnt .8. rph rtr f SpIntrvl n .. Efft f A Intrvl btn Sp n l Strtr, An 00 Stndrd rpnt 8 bl xv .0. rph rtr f Mrtlt n .. Mrtlt n: Mr f l Strtr, An 00 Stndrd rpnt 200 .2. rph rtr f rtlt n 20 .. rtlt n: Mr f l Strtr, An 00 Stndrd rpnt 202 .4. Mr f Stl Strtr, An St pthtl l: Mrr n 204 .. Mr f Stl Strtr, An St pthtl l: rnt Mrrn n 204 .6. Mr f Stl Strtr, An St pthtl l: Mrtlt n 20 .. Mr f Stl Strtr, An St pthtl l: rtlt n 206 E.. Sltn lt, An 8 Stndrd rpnt 20 E.2. rnt f Extnddl Mbr dn n "rtl" nd "rzntl" l, nhr n, 8 2 E.. Mrtl Stt f Wn vr , nhr n, 8 2 E.4. dhp ttrn fr rn n hrGnrtn l, nhr n, 8 2 .. MltplClftn Anl f th rbblt f dn n n Extndd l, Er Cnt, 8 22 .2. MltplClftn Anl f th rbblt f dn n n Extndd l, Er Cnt, 8 22 .. MltplClftn Anl f th rbblt f dn n n Extndd l, Er Cnt, 880 22 .4. MltplClftn Anl f th rbblt f dn n n Extndd l fr Wn Ad 8 r Oldr, Er Cnt, 880 22 .. MltplClftn Anl f th rbblt f dn n n Extndd l, Er Cnt, 00 20 .6. MltplClftn Anl f th rbblt f dn n n Extndd l fr Wn Ad 8 r Oldr, Er Cnt, 00 2 xv bl .. MltplClftn Anl f th rbblt f dn n n Extndd l, Er Cnt, 22 .. MltplClftn Anl f th rbblt f dn n n Extndd l fr Wn Ad 8 r Oldr, Er Cnt, 2 .. MltplClftn Anl f th rbblt f dn n n Extndd l, rtn nd Slfrd, nhr, 8 24 .0. MltplClftn Anl f th rbblt f dn n n Extndd l fr Wn Ad 8 r Oldr, rtn nd Slfrd, nhr, 8 2 Preface St nt rnbl l ntt l t thn. W pnd n fl lt f t trn t drn t thn th h nd drdr, nd t tr t hrd. W hv ntrtd vn f t rvl lfdjtn hn, n n hh vr rv n ntl prp t th prtn f th hn hl. A f r , l ntt n xtl ht hppnd t th fl drn th nntnth ntr: thr hft fr xtndd t nlr fl trtr, hh rrd b th nlr fl fntnll dptd t ndtrl t. W n hv n vdn hh h tht th ppt hn t pl: th frn f xtndd fl rhl dbld btn bt 0 nd 00. S th ld thr h bn dfd th f hlr h rnz tht thr n nr n th frn f xtndd fl n t th v tht t th extended fl tht fntnll dptd t rl ndtrl t. h b r tht nnt xpln th r f th xtndd fl b tnrn th fntnlt thr. h nntnthntr xtndd fl nt fntnl dpttn t n l ndtn th rn ppl nrnl rdd n xtndd fl hd lttl t d th n prp th xtndd fl hv rvd. Intd, th xtndd fl hld b vd n ndrt nn f hnn l ndtn. nrvl th tr pd b th hh frn f xtndd fl n th nntnth ntr, I rnd p th l pt: n, drph, nd ltr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Placement of Children with Relatives
    STATE STATUTES Current Through January 2018 WHAT’S INSIDE Placement of Children With Giving preference to relatives for out-of-home Relatives placements When a child is removed from the home and placed Approving relative in out-of-home care, relatives are the preferred placements resource because this placement type maintains the child’s connections with his or her family. In fact, in Placement of siblings order for states to receive federal payments for foster care and adoption assistance, federal law under title Adoption by relatives IV-E of the Social Security Act requires that they Summaries of state laws “consider giving preference to an adult relative over a nonrelated caregiver when determining a placement for a child, provided that the relative caregiver meets all relevant state child protection standards.”1 Title To find statute information for a IV-E further requires all states2 operating a title particular state, IV-E program to exercise due diligence to identify go to and provide notice to all grandparents, all parents of a sibling of the child, where such parent has legal https://www.childwelfare. gov/topics/systemwide/ custody of the sibling, and other adult relatives of the laws-policies/state/. child (including any other adult relatives suggested by the parents) that (1) the child has been or is being removed from the custody of his or her parents, (2) the options the relative has to participate in the care and placement of the child, and (3) the requirements to become a foster parent to the child.3 1 42 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Major Influences of the Boundless-Extended Family System on The
    Fayetteville State University DigitalCommons@Fayetteville State University Faculty Working Papers from the School of School of Education Education Summer 2008 The aM jor Influences of the Boundless-Extended Family System on the Professional Experiences of Black Zimbabwean Women Leaders in Higher Education Miriam Chitiga Fayetteville State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uncfsu.edu/soe_faculty_wp Part of the Higher Education Commons Recommended Citation Chitiga, Miriam, "The aM jor Influences of the Boundless-Extended Family System on the Professional Experiences of Black Zimbabwean Women Leaders in Higher Education" (2008). Faculty Working Papers from the School of Education. Paper 25. http://digitalcommons.uncfsu.edu/soe_faculty_wp/25 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Education at DigitalCommons@Fayetteville State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Working Papers from the School of Education by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Fayetteville State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Forum on Public Policy The Major Influences of the Boundless-Extended Family System on the Professional Experiences of Black Zimbabwean Women Leaders in Higher Education Miriam Miranda Chitiga, Claflin University, Orangeburg, South Carolina Abstract The article examines the major influences of the black Zimbabwean boundless- extended family system on the professional trajectories of women leaders working within the higher education system of Zimbabwe. The study is based on in-depth interviews conducted with thirty female leaders who shared information about their major family responsibilities. Using an analytical framework that facilitates a critical analysis of the evidence, the paper discusses the persisting significance of the interdependent systems of social stratification, namely race, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, and class in the private and public spheres of the female leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Trends Affecting Families in Central America and the Caribbean
    Major Trends Affecting Families in Central America and the Caribbean Prepared by: Dr. Godfrey St. Bernard The University of the West Indies St. Augustine Trinidad and Tobago Phone Contacts: 1-868-776-4768 (mobile) 1-868-640-5584 (home) 1-868-662-2002 ext. 2148 (office) E-mail Contacts: [email protected] [email protected] Prepared for: United Nations Division of Social Policy and Development Department of Economic and Social Affairs Program on the Family Date: May 23, 2003 Introduction Though an elusive concept, the family is a social institution that binds two or more individuals into a primary group to the extent that the members of the group are related to one another on the basis of blood relationships, affinity or some other symbolic network of association. It is an essential pillar upon which all societies are built and with such a character, has transcended time and space. Often times, it has been mooted that the most constant thing in life is change, a phenomenon that is characteristic of the family irrespective of space and time. The dynamic character of family structures, - including members’ status, their associated roles, functions and interpersonal relationships, - has an important impact on a host of other social institutional spheres, prospective economic fortunes, political decision-making and sustainable futures. Assuming that the ultimate goal of all societies is to enhance quality of life, the family constitutes a worthy unit of inquiry. Whether from a social or economic standpoint, the family is critical in stimulating the well being of a people. The family has been and will continue to be subjected to myriad social, economic, cultural, political and environmental forces that shape it.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociology of the Family
    *Enrollment* This course is currently over‐enrolled, so I will be taking attendance during each class during the first two weeks, dropping students who miss two consecutive classes without notifying me, and adding in students from the waitlist. This applies to enrolled and waitlisted students, so make sure you sign in! Sociology 111 –Sociology of the Family UC Berkeley, Spring 2012 227 Cory, MWF 10‐11 Instructor: Joanna Reed, Ph.D. Office hours: Wed. 1‐3 and by appointment, 472 Barrows [email protected] Course Description We all are part of families, for better and for worse. Families are universally important social institutions, past and present. Although the majority of families around the world have certain things in common—relating people biologically and socially, organizing care and residence, the specifics of how these things are accomplished may vary substantially across time and space. This course focuses on families in the contemporary U.S. It will introduce you to how sociologists study families and along with them, topics that seem very personal, emotional and important to many of us—ideals about love, marriage, gender, parenthood, sex and sexuality—scientifically. We consider both the “public” and “private” dimensions of families over the course of the semester‐‐ families as settings for socially important tasks such as raising children and caring for family members, and a focus for public policy and as the place where we experience much of our private lives. A central theme will be diversity and change, as we consider the many ways families have changed over the last 60 years in particular in the U.S., and the myriad forms of family diversity that surround us.
    [Show full text]
  • Kin Relationships
    In H. T. Reis & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia of human relationships (pp. 951-954). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Kin Relationships Kin relationships are traditionally defined as ties based on blood and marriage. They include lineal generational bonds (children, parents, grandparents, and great- grandparents), collateral bonds (siblings, cousins, nieces and nephews, and aunts and uncles), and ties with in-laws. An often-made distinction is that between primary kin (members of the families of origin and procreation) and secondary kin (other family members). The former are what people generally refer to as “immediate family,” and the latter are generally labeled “extended family.” Marriage, as a principle of kinship, differs from blood in that it can be terminated. Given the potential for marital break-up, blood is recognized as the more important principle of kinship. This entry questions the appropriateness of traditional definitions of kinship for “new” family forms, describes distinctive features of kin relationships, and explores varying perspectives on the functions of kin relationships. Questions About Definition Changes over the last thirty years in patterns of family formation and dissolution have given rise to questions about the definition of kin relationships. Guises of kinship have emerged to which the criteria of blood and marriage do not apply. Assisted reproduction is a first example. Births resulting from infertility treatments such as gestational surrogacy and in vitro fertilization with ovum donation challenge the biogenetic basis for kinship. A similar question arises for adoption, which has a history 2 going back to antiquity. Partnerships formed outside of marriage are a second example. Strictly speaking, the family ties of nonmarried cohabitees do not fall into the category of kin, notwithstanding the greater acceptance over time of consensual unions both formally and informally.
    [Show full text]
  • Family and Intimate Relationships: a Review of the Sociological Research
    Families Family and Intimate Relationships: A Review of the Sociological Research Val Gillies Families & Social Capital ESRC Research Group South Bank University 103 Borough Road London SE1 0AA June 2003 Published by South Bank University © Families & Social Capital ESRC Research Group ISBN 1-874418-33-0 Families & Social Capital ESRC Research Group Working Paper No. 2 FAMILY AND INTIMATE RELATIONSHIPS: A REVIEW OF THE SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH Val Gillies Page Introduction 2 Models of Families, Kinship and Change 3 From Social Obligations to Negotiated Change 9 Breakdown, Democratisation or Continuity 15 Intimacy as Social Capital 16 Researching Intimate Relationships 18 References 19 1 Introduction The phrase ‘intimate relationship’ is a broad and fluid term, in that it can encompass numerous different associations between friends, sexual partners, family and kin. This working paper examines how sociological constructions of family and intimate relations have shifted over the years, exploring how particular bodies of literature have documented and shaped understandings of social connectedness. It will be argued that there are three major sociological perspectives on contemporary personal relations, with theorists emphasising breakdown, democratisation or continuity. Having reviewed the available research and outlined each perspective, this paper moves on to contextualise the three different interpretations, relating them to current debates around the concept of social capital. As Lynn Jamieson (1998) notes, the word ‘intimacy’ has come to replace what would previously have been termed ‘primary relationships’, signifying a new focus on the quality as opposed to the structure of such relationships. Within the field of sociology the term intimacy has taken on a particular significance, describing a theoretical stance that has emerged and colonised topics of interest that were previously viewed from the perspectives of family or community studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Genetic Basis of Human Health and Disease: Role of Molecular Genetics in Diagnosis and Prognostication
    This open-access article is distributed under Creative Commons licence CC-BY-NC 4.0. CME GUEST EDITORIAL Understanding the genetic basis of human health and disease: Role of molecular genetics in diagnosis and prognostication Human genetics is the study of inheritance as it occurs in human beings. family who first comes to the attention of a geneticist is called the It encompasses several overlapping areas, including cytogenetics, proband. Usually, the phenotype of the proband is exceptional in molecular genetics, biochemical genetics, genomics, clinical genetics, some way (e.g. characteristic facies or short stature). The geneticist developmental genetics, population genetics and genetic counselling. is then able to trace the history of the phenotype in the proband Genes can be the common factor underlying the qualities of most back through the history of the family and draws a family tree or human-inherited traits. The study of human genetics can be useful, pedigree. In the study of genetic disorders, four general patterns as it can answer questions about human nature, understand diseases of inheritance are distinguishable by pedigree analysis: autosomal and development of effective disease treatment, and contribute to recessive, autosomal dominant, X-linked recessive, and X-linked understanding genetics of human life. DNA contains instructions dominant. for everything our cells do, from conception until death. Studying A glossary of terms is set out in Table 1. the human genome allows us to explore fundamental details about ourselves.[1] The Human Genome Project Genomics refers to the field of genetics focused on structural The HGP, the international quest to understand the genomes of and functional studies of the genome.
    [Show full text]
  • Racial and Ethnic Differences in Extended Family, Friendship, Fictive Kin, and Congregational Informal Support Networks
    ROBERT JOSEPH TAYLOR University of Michigan ∗ LINDA M. CHATTERS University of Michigan ∗∗ AMANDA TOLER WOODWARD Michigan State University ∗∗∗ EDNA BROWN University of Connecticut Racial and Ethnic Differences in Extended Family, Friendship, Fictive Kin, and Congregational Informal Support Networks This study examined differences in kin and Black Caribbeans had larger fictive kin networks nonkin networks among African Americans, than non-Hispanic Whites, but non-Hispanic Caribbean Blacks (Black Caribbeans), and non- Whites with fictive kin received support from Hispanic Whites. Data are taken from the them more frequently than African Americans National Survey of American Life, a nation- and Black Caribbeans. The discussion notes ally representative study of African Americans, the importance of examining kin and nonkin net- Black Caribbeans, and non-Hispanic Whites. works, as well as investigating ethnic differences Selected measures of informal support from within the Black American population. family, friendship, fictive kin, and congregation/ church networks were utilized. African Ameri- Involvement with kin and nonkin is an cans were more involved in congregation net- essential component of daily life for the vast works, whereas non-Hispanic Whites were more majority of Americans. Family and friendship involved in friendship networks. African Ameri- support networks are important for coping cans were more likely to give support to extended with the ongoing stresses of daily life (e.g., family members and to have daily interaction Benin & Keith, 1995), providing a place to with family members. African Americans and live when confronting homelessness (Taylor, Chatters, & Celious, 2003), and in coping with physical and mental health problems School of Social Work, 1080 South University Avenue, Ann (Cohen, Underwood, & Gottlieb, 2000; Lincoln, Arbor, MI 48109-1106 ([email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • The Transformation of American Family Structure
    The Transformation of American Family Structure STEVEN RUGGLES "EXPLODED-'MYTH' OF THE VICTORIAN FAMILY," screamed the two-inch head- line in the tabloid Daily Mail on April 5, 1990. The subheadline read, "People Today Care Far More, Historian Claims." The historian referred to was Richard Wall, one of the foremost scholars of historical family structure, and the occasion for the article was a paper he presented to the British SociologicalAssociation on the history of living arrangements among the elderly. The newspaper quoted Wall: "The image of a golden age in the past when granny sat beside the fire knitting, while helping to look after the children, is a popular myth ... if anything, family ties were less strong in past centuries."' Wall was not the first to explode this particular myth. In fact, his paper falls squarely within a prominent historiographical tradition. For more than thirty years, sociologists and historians have been combating the theory that there was a transition from extended to nuclear family structure. Instead, the revisionists argue, family structure has remained unchanged and overwhelmingly nuclear in northwestern Europe and North America for centuries. Recounting this revision- ist interpretation has become obligatory in writing on historical family structure.2 Funding for data preparation was provided by the National Science Foundation (SES-9118299, 1991-93, and SES-9210903, 1992-95); the National Institute of Child Health and Human Devel- opment (HD 25839, 1989-93); and the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota (1985-93). The research was carried out under a Bush Sabbatical fellowship from the University of Minnesota (1992-93).
    [Show full text]
  • The Family, Political Theory, and Ideology: a Comparative Study of John Stuart Mill and Friedrich Engels
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 5-2019 The Family, Political Theory, and Ideology: A Comparative Study of John Stuart Mill and Friedrich Engels David M. Murray Jr. The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/3172 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] THE FAMILY, POLITICAL THEORY, AND IDEOLOGY: A Comparative Study of John Stuart Mill and Friedrich Engels by DAVID MURRAY A master’s thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Liberal Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, The City University of New York 2019 © 2019 DAVID MURRAY All Rights Reserved ii The Family, Political Theory, and Ideology: A Comparative Study of John Stuart Mill and Friedrich Engels by David Murray This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Liberal Studies in satisfaction of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts. Date Helena Rosenblatt Thesis Advisor Date Elizabeth Macaulay-Lewis Executive Officer THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT The Family, Political Theory and Ideology: A Comparative Study of John Stuart Mill and Friedrich Engels by David Murray Advisor: Helena Rosenblatt [This project is concerned with the development of the Christian family in Europe and how its sociological and historical characteristics informed the writings of John Stuart Mill and Friedrich Engels.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinship and Gender in South and Southeast Asia: Patterns and Contrasts /By Leela Dube
    Kinship and Gender in South and Southeast Asia: patterns and Contrasts /by Leela Dube. 1994. 45p. (9th J.P. Naik Memorial Lecture, 1994 ). Kinship and Gender in South and Southeast Asia: Patterns and Contrasts I am honoured to have been asked to deliver the Ninth J.P. Naik Memorial Lecture. My sense of gratitude to Naik Sahab has a twofold immediacy today. I worked closely with him. To many of us it is painful to put the words 'the late' before his name. So much dynamism, energy and vitality cannot just wither away. His example and inspiration survive with us. Naik Sahab was a thinker and a doer: reflection became meaningful when it led to action. The debts that we owe him are many and in diverse fields; but for women with a cause he will always occupy a special place. I salute the legacy of J.P. Naik. He is much more than a memory, not mere sepia-tinted nostalgia. Second, this presentation is based on a manuscript which had its beginnings in the comparative project on 'Women's Work and Family Strategies' and was conceived of and written to provide a background for grasping the differences between South and Southeast Asia. It gave me the opportunity to travel across the two regions, explore relevant literature and meet scholars and common people. I am beholden to Vina Mazumdar and Hanna Papanek, the two directors of the project. I also thank Lotika, Kumud, Malavika and Narayan for their help. I gratefully remember a number of people spread over South and Southeast Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Intergenerational Estrangement Between Older Parents And
    Every family: Intergenerational estrangement between older parents and their adult-children Kylie Beth Agllias BSW (Hons), UoN, AUST. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Social Work) University of Newcastle School of Humanities and Social Science May 2011 Declaration This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to this copy of my thesis, when deposited in the University Library, being made available for loan and photocopying subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Signed:............................................................. Date:.................................................. i Acknowledgements A mind that is stretched to a new idea never returns to its original dimension (Oliver W. Holmes) Some suggest the proof of a good thesis is when the examiner knows the student learnt something. However, the main lessons are the ones witnessed by supervisors, family, and friends, the lessons most often excluded from the text. I would like to thank the following people who witnessed and supported my doctoral journey and the associated life lessons: To my doctoral supervisors, mentors and colleagues, Professor Mel Gray and Doctor Jill Gibbons, I cannot thank you enough for your encouragement, guidance, and faith. You ‘saw me’ well before I knew myself. To my wonderfully generous, loving, amusing, and busy family, James, Kara, Paige, and Tyson, I love you. You are my world.
    [Show full text]