DOCSLIB.ORG

Containment? Leogrande the United States, Nicaragua, and the Search for Peace in Central America

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Containment? Leogrande the United States, Nicaragua, and the Search for Peace in Central America Rollback or William M. Containment? LeoGrande The United States, Nicaragua, and the Search for Peace in Central America I whenRonald Reagan came to office in 1981, his Administration’s foremost objective in Central America was the same as President Carter’s had been: to prevent the Sal- vadoran revolutionary movement from coming to power. This objective de- Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/isec/article-pdf/11/2/89/690923/isec.11.2.89.pdf by guest on 30 September 2021 rived from the familiar imperative of containment-not to lose any additional countries to communism (or, in its Latin American variant, not to allow “another Cuba”). Many in the Reagan Administration, however, were not content with containment; instead, they were eager to try to roll back communism in the Third World-an agenda that gained considerable impetus in the second Reagan Administration and came to be known as the Reagan Doctrine.’ As applied in Central America and the Caribbean, the rollback doctrine was aimed at Nicaragua and Grenada and perhaps, if fortuitous circumstances arose, at Cuba as well. Not everyone in the Administration shared this zest for “pro-insurgency.” Professionals in the national security bureaucracies generally saw the new doctrine as reckless, dangerous, and ineffective. But many of Reagan’s po- litical appointees, drawn as they were from the Republican Party’s ideological right, were more than willing to conduct a high-risk foreign policy if it held out hope of rolling back the Soviets’ ”Evil Empire” at the periphery. This division meant that policy toward El Salvador was easier to agree upon than policy toward Nicaragua. The objective of defeating the Salva- doran rebels was universally accepted; disagreements, though often sharp, were merely tactical. Nicaragua proved to be more contentious because it crystallized the Administration’s internal division: should the ”communists” in Managua be overthrown or should they simply be contained? The tension between the adherents of containment and those of rollback has produced a policy that often appears schizophrenic and difficult to decipher because the fundamental objectives behind it are in dispute. This schism was most clearly manifested in the debate over whether to seek some sort of negotiated accord William M. LeoGrande is Associate Professor of Political Science in the School of Government and Public Administration at the American University in Washington, D.C. He is co-editor of Confronting Revo- lution: Security Through Diplomacy in Central America, recently published by Pantheon. 1. By 1986, the Administration was more or less publicly providing support to insurgencies against ”communist” regimes in Nicaragua, Angola, Cambodia, and Afghanistan. [nternational Security, Fall 1986 (Vol. 11, No. 2) 0 1986 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College and of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 89 International Security 1 90 with the Sandinistas based upon international security issues or to press instead for the elimination of the Sandinista “cancer.”2 The aim of this article is to chronicle the various efforts to achieve a diplomatic settlement of the conflict between Nicaragua and the United States, and of the tensions between Nicaragua and its Central American Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/isec/article-pdf/11/2/89/690923/isec.11.2.89.pdf by guest on 30 September 2021 neighbors. The recurrent motif in all the diplomatic efforts, bilateral and multilateral, formal and informal, has been the unwillingness of the United States to fully support them because of its own internal disagreement over its ultimate objectives in Nicaragua. Despite enormous changes in the regional situation over the past six years--the birth and growth of the contras, the escalation of the rhetorical war between Nicaragua and the United States, the creation of Contadora- the diplomatic deadlock between Nicaragua and the United States has re- mained fundamentally unchanged. Since at least early 1981, if not earlier, the Sandinistas have indicated a willingness to make concessions to the United States regarding their foreign policy (specifically, their support for other Central American revolutionaries and their military ties to Cuba and the Soviet Union) in exchange for Washington’s acceptance of their revolu- 2. The literature on Nicaragua and on relations between Nicaragua and the United States is vast and growing rapidly. The best history of U.S.-Nicaraguan relations is still Richard Millet, Guardians of the Dynasty (New York: Orbis, 1977). On the internal situation in Nicaragua both before and after the 1979 revolution, see John A. Booth, The End and the Beginning: The Nicaraguan Revolution (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1982); Thomas W. Walker, Nicaragua: The Land of Sandino (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1981); and Dennis Gilbert, “Nicaragua,” in Moms J. Blachman, William M. LeoGrande, and Kenneth Sharpe, eds., Confronting Revolution: Security Through Diplomacy in Central America (New York: Pantheon, 1986). A number of recent books focus on developments in Nicaragua since the revolution. Among the best are two volumes edited by Thomas W. Walker, Nicaragua in Revolution (New York: Praeger, 1982) and Nicaragua: The First Five Years (New York: Praeger, 1985). Carlos M. Vilas, The Sandinisfa Revolution (New York: Monthly Review, 1986), provides an account sympathetic to the Sandinistas, and Shirley Christian, Revolution in the Family (New York: Vintage, 1986) provides one sympathetic to their opponents. Bruce Marcus has edited a very useful volume of key speeches by Sandinista leaders, Nicaragua: The Sandinista People’s Revolution (New York: Pathfinder, 1985). On relations between Nicaragua and the United States, see the extensive collection of articles and documents in Peter Rosset and John Vandermeer, eds., The Nicaragua Reader: Documents of a Revolution under Fire (New York: Grove Press, 1983). For a discussion of the covert war and a first-hand account of the contras, see Christopher Dickey, With the Contras: A Reporter in the Wilds of Nicaragua (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1985). The broader international implications of the Central American conflict are discussed in Richard E. Feinberg, ed., Central America, International Dimensions of the Crisis (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1982); Joseph Cirincione, ed., Central America and fhe Western Alliance (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1985); and Andrew J. Pierre, ed., Third World Instability: Central America as a European-American Issue (New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 1985). Rollback or Containment I 91 tion. The Carter Administration implicitly accepted this bargain; the Reagan Administration would not. Within the Reagan Administration, the faction that The New York Times dubbed ”the war party’’ has successfully blocked any diplomatic settlement that would require coexistence between Washing- ton and Managua because that would end any hope of getting Nicaragua Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/isec/article-pdf/11/2/89/690923/isec.11.2.89.pdf by guest on 30 September 2021 back from “communism.”3 Hesitant Diplomacy: The Pezzullo and Enders Initiatives Initially, Reagan’s policy toward Nicaragua was a function of the effort to win the war in El Salvador. Nicaraguan assistance to the Salvadoran rebels (the Revolutionary Democratic Front-Farabundo Marti Front for National Liberation, FDR-FMLN) had expanded during the months prior to their “final offensive” of January 1981 and was seen within the Administration as an essential element in the war. Secretary of State Alexander Haig, in particular, firmly believed that the key lesson of Vietnam was the need to ”go to the source” to defeat a guerrilla insurgency, i.e., to cut off the guerrillas’ logistics. Initially, U.S. policy focused on how to halt Nicaragua’s aid to the FDR- FMLN. U.S. Ambassador Lawrence Pezzullo was able to convince the new Administration that it could restore the understanding Washington had with the Sandinistas before Reagan’s election-that U.S. economic aid was contin- gent upon Nicaraguan restraint in El Salvador. Although the Sandinistas responded positively to Pezzullo’s efforts by reducing their aid to the FDR- FMLN, hard-liners within the Reagan Administration were determined to win Nicaragua’s acquiescence not to the carrot of economic aid but to the stick of threatened military action. On April 1, 1981, U.S. economic aid was cut Shortly thereafter, Pezzullo left his post as ambassador and retired from the Foreign Service. In August 1981, Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs Thomas 0. Enders initiated a second effort to restore the earlier understand- ings with Nicaragua. The United States set forth two basic conditions for improving relations: Nicaragua had to cease its support for the guerrillas in El Salvador and to halt its military buildup. Washington also proposed that Nicaragua join with the other Central American nations in an agreement to 3. “It Takes Two to Contadora“ (editorial), The New York Times, May 22, 1986. 4. “US.Halts Economic Aid to Nicaragua,” The New York Times, April 2, 1981. International Security I 92 ban the importation of sophisticated weapons. In exchange, the United States offered to sign a nonaggression pact with Nicaragua under the terms of the Rio Treaty, make an effort to close the paramilitary training camps for Ni- caraguan exiles that had sprung up in the United States, and ask Congress to restore economic assistance to Nicarag~a.~ Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/isec/article-pdf/11/2/89/690923/isec.11.2.89.pdf by guest on 30 September 2021 No agreement was reached on any of these issues. The Nicaraguans denied that they were providing material assistance to the Salvadoran rebels and rejected the U.S. demand that they limit their military buildup, as a violation of their sovereignty. Moreover, the Nicaraguans did not trust the U.S. to meet its commitments. The Rio Treaty already prohibited the United States from resorting to force or the threat of force in its relations with Nicaragua, and the U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mercosur: the Common Market of the Twenty-First Century?
    GEORGIA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW VOLUME 32 2004 NUMBER 1 MERCOSUR: THE COMMON MARKET OF THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY? Rafael A. Porrata-Doria,Jr. * I. INTRODUCTION MERCOSUR, the "Common Market of the Southern Cone," was created in March 1990 by the Treaty of Asunci6n and was meant to create a common market among its four signatories (Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay) by December 31, 1994.' This common market would include the graduated elimination of all customs duties among its signatories,2 the creation of a common external tariff, the adoption of a common trade policy,3 and the harmonization of economic policies The Treaty of Asunci6n, and its * Professor of Law, Temple University. J.D. 1977, Yale University; M.A., University of Pennsylvania; B.A. 1974, University of Pennsylvania. This Article, based substantially on research materials not available in English, is the first comprehensive description and evaluation of MERCOSUR in the English language. The author is a former consultant to the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank) and was a mission participant and co- author of its study "Competition Policy and MERCOSUR" (1996). The author gratefully acknowledges the helpful comments of Marina Angel, Jeffrey Dunoff, and Henry Richardson. The author particularly appreciates the outstanding efforts of his principal research assistant, Julie Liebenberg, J.D. 2004, Temple University School of Law, and of his current research assistant, Suzette Sanders, J.D. expected 2005, Temple University School of Law. The information in this Article is current as of August 2003. ' Treaty of Asunci6n Establishing a Common Market among Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay, Mar.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of the Inter-American System
    V Congreso Latinoamericano de Ciencia Política. Asociación Latinoamericana de Ciencia Política, Buenos Aires, 2010. The Rise and Fall of the Inter-American System. Poggio Teixeira Carlos Gustavo. Cita: Poggio Teixeira Carlos Gustavo (2010). The Rise and Fall of the Inter-American System. V Congreso Latinoamericano de Ciencia Política. Asociación Latinoamericana de Ciencia Política, Buenos Aires. Dirección estable: http://www.aacademica.org/000-036/565 Acta Académica es un proyecto académico sin fines de lucro enmarcado en la iniciativa de acceso abierto. Acta Académica fue creado para facilitar a investigadores de todo el mundo el compartir su producción académica. Para crear un perfil gratuitamente o acceder a otros trabajos visite: http://www.aacademica.org. The rise and fall of the Inter-American System Carlos Gustavo Poggio Teixeira Doctoral candidate in International Studies at Old Dominion University, with sponsorship from Fulbright and the Brazilian Ministry of Education. E-mail: [email protected] Field: International Relations Paper prepared for presentation at the V Congreso Latinoamericano de Ciencia Política, organized by Asociación Latinoamericana de Ciencia Política (ALACIP). Buenos Aires, July 28- 30, 2010 Abstract This paper proposes to look back at the evolution of the so called Inter-American System since its first manifestations in the first half of the 19th century in order to shed some light on current developments. Some explanations that may have led to the current atmosphere of deterioration of this system are proposed. Additionally, it intends to assess what this deterioration means and what practical consequences it may bring. The conclusion is that the recent events are in fact symptom of a broader historical phenomenon of increasingly decline of the Inter-American System and if the present posture is maintained this decline tends to get steeper overtime.
    [Show full text]
  • 372 7 July 1988 I H;Ivc Th< Hunour to Rcfcr to the Qur.Stioiis Put to The
    372 BORDER AND TRANSBORDER ARMED ACTIONS 7 July 1988 I h;ivc th< hunour to rcfcr to the qur.stioiis put to the Pnrtics hv hlcmbcr, of the (:o~rt durin2 thc i~ral hearings in the ciise ccinccrning Ilordt,r <i!z,l ?iior\l>orLlrrAr>>inl ,tcrron~ l.V!ci!rdwiiii v. I/<,lz,lriruv,. :ind Io rccliil th:it 31 thc hearing held on 13 Junc 1988, YOU; Excellency staled that written replies of the Government of Honduras to these questions would be dcposited with the Registrar (supra, p. 148). ~-~~~~~~Article 61 of the Rules of Court orovides that when auestions are out to the agents, counsel or advocatcs of the parties during the hearings, they "may either answer immediately or within a time-limit fixed by the President". No such lime-limit was set during the hearings; in view however of the facl that the Court has now to deliberaie on the case in accordance with Article 54; paragraph 2; of the Statute, and therefore requires to be fully informed, the Vice-President of the Court. Actine" President. has decided Io fix 15 Julv 1988 as the time-limit for replies to the questions put during the hearings. A similar letter is today being addressed to the Agent of Nicaragua. 97. THE AGENT OF NICARAGUA TO THE REGISTRAR 8 July 1988. 1 have the honour to refcr to the questions put to the parties by Membcrs of the Court during the oral hearings in the case conceming Border and Transborder Armed Actions (Nicaragua v. tlonditras). The answers Io the questions in reference are included herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Building" Nuestra América:" National Sovereignty and Regional
    Building “Nuestra América:” National Sovereignty and Regional Integration in the Americas* Renata Keller** “It is the hour of reckoning and of marching in unison, and we must move in lines as compact as the veins of silver that lie at the roots of the Andes.” José Martí, “Nuestra América,”1891 José Martí, the Cuban intellectual and independence hero, publis- hed one of his most important essays in a Mexican newspaper while representing Uruguay at the First International Conference of Ame- rican States in Washington DC in 1891. Titled “Nuestra América,” Martí’s call to action touched on a number of themes, including nati- onalism, imperialism, and racism. He urged his readers to discard * Article submitted on September 16th, 2013 and approved for publication in October 16th, 2013. ** Renata Keller is an assistant professor of International Relations at Boston University and holds a Ph.D. in History from the University of Texas at Austin. Her research and teaching interests focus on Latin American history, particularly the connections between foreign and domestic politics, the dynamics of the Cold War, and U.S. relations with Latin America. E-mail: [email protected]. CONTEXTO INTERNACIONAL Rio de Janeiro, vol. 35, no 2, julho/dezembro 2013, p. 537-564. 537 Contexto Internacional (PUC) Vol. 35 no 2 – jul/dez 2013 1ª Revisão: 29/12/2013 Renata Keller their provincial mindsets, insisting that “hometowns that are still strangers to one another XX must hurry to become acquainted, like men who are about to battle together” (MARTÍ, 1977, p. 26).
    [Show full text]
  • Download (777Kb)
    Press Release € uropennCommwntties New York, 22 November 1985 PR L6/AS E.C. AND CENTRAL AMERICA MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE The European Community last week strengthened its ties to Central America at a Conference that produced a five-year Cooperation Agree- ment, a plan for joint annual meetings to promote political dialogue, and Economj-c and Po1itical Communiqu6s. "This is a very important political step, I I said C1aude Cheysson, E.C. Commissioner for North-South Relatj-ons, noting that the Commu- nity strongly supports regional cooperation around the world. "We must now demonstrate our will to act together in the medium and long term, with mutual regard and the recognition of differences, in the framework of an agrreement of peace and cooperation. " Attending the LL-L2 November Conference in Luxembourg, in addition to Mr. Cheysson, were the Foreign Ministers of the 10 E.C. Member States, future members Spain and Portugal; Costa Rica, EI Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua (States parties to the General Treaty for Central Amerj-ca Economic Integration); and the Contadora Group members Colombia, Mexico, Panama and Venezuela. They took the following actions : Cooperation Agreement. The Community and the six countries of the us signed a five-year accord under which they agreed to strengthen trade relations between the two regions on the basis of most-favoured nation treatment, to cooperate in technologi- cal, agricultural, indusLrial and other fields, and to promote European investment in Central America. The Community agreed to increase substantially its aid to Central America, with a particular emphasis on regional projects. It further pledged to examine ways to improve the EC Generalized System of Preferences, which provides trade concessions to developing countries, as it applies to Central America.
    [Show full text]
  • European Community Latin American Relations
    European Community Latin American relations EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Q ECONOMIC AND "=.:/ SOCIAL COMMITTEE Brussels 1993 'I'IJ ,2_ (!o5:) (132) ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL CONSULTATIVE ASSEMBLY J:uropean Community Latin American relations -- EUROPEAN •coMMUNITIES ECONOMIC AND 'SOCIAL COMMITTEE Brussels 1993 This publication is available in the following languages: English, French, Spanish and Portugese Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication Reproduction is authorized, except for commercial purposes, provided the source is ack­ nowledged. Catalogue number: CES-93-001-EN CONTENTS Page MEMBERS OF THE WORKING GROUP .. .. .. 2 FOREWORD.............................................................................. 3 THE POSITION OF LATIN AMERICA IN THE NEW INTERNATIONAL SITUATION ..................................................... 5 MAIN EVENTS AND TENDENCIES IN LATIN AMERICA.................. 7 REGIONAL INTEGRATION AND SOCIETY .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 12 RELATIONS BETWEEN THE EC AND LATIN AMERICA................... 13 CONCLUSIONS . .. .. 16 APPENDICES I. Features of the various integration and cooperation programmes . 19 II. Statistical tables . 23 * * * * * 2 EC/Latin American relations MEMBERS OF THE WORKING GROUP The preparatory work for this Report was carried out by the following Members of the Eco­ nomic and Social Committee's Section for External Relations, Trade and Development Poli­ cy, assisted by the Rapporteur's and the Groups' Experts whose names are also given below: Chairman Mr CA V ALEIRO
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union's Policy Towards Mercosur
    towards Mercosur towards policy Union’s The European EPRU The European Union’s policy towards Mercosur European Series Policy This book provides a distinctive and empirically rich account of the European Research Union’s (EU’s) relationship with the Common Market of the South (Mercosur). It seeks to examine the motivations that determine the EU’s policy towards Unit Mercosur, the most important relationship the EU has with another regional Series economic integration organization. In order to investigate these motivations (or lack thereof), this study The European examines the contribution of the main policy- and decision-makers, the European Commission and the Council of Ministers, as well as the different contributions of the two institutions. It analyses the development of EU policy towards Mercosur in relation to three key stages: non-institutionalized Union’s policy relations (1986–1990), official relations (1991–1995), and the negotiations for an association agreement (1996–2004 and 2010–present). Arana argues that the dominant explanations in the literature fail to towards adequately explain the EU’s policy – in particular, these accounts tend to infer the EU’s motives from its activity. Drawing on extensive primary documents, the book argues that the major developments in the relationship were initiated by Mercosur and supported mainly by Spain. Rather than Mercosur the EU pursuing a strategy, as implied by most of the existing literature, the EU was largely responsive, which explains why the relationship is much less developed than the EU’s relations with other parts of the world. The European Union’s policy towards Mercosur will benefit academics and Responsive not strategic postgraduate students of European Union Foreign Affairs, inter-regionalism Gomez Arana and Latin American regionalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Ronald Reagan and the Peace Process in Central America: the Contadora’S Shortsight
    RONALD REAGAN AND THE PEACE PROCESS IN CENTRAL AMERICA: THE CONTADORA’S SHORTSIGHT Major Rafael Ayala Divassi JCSP 40 PCEMI 40 Exercise Solo Flight Exercice Solo Flight Disclaimer Avertissement Opinions expressed remain those of the author and do Les opinons exprimées n’engagent que leurs auteurs et not represent Department of National Defence or ne reflètent aucunement des politiques du Ministère de Canadian Forces policy. This paper may not be used la Défense nationale ou des Forces canadiennes. Ce without written permission. papier ne peut être reproduit sans autorisation écrite. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the © Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, représentée par le Minister of National Defence, 2014. ministre de la Défense nationale, 2014. 1 CANADIAN FORCES COLLEGE / COLLÈGE DES FORCES CANADIENNES JCSP 40 / PCEMI 40 SOLO FLIGHT RONALD REAGAN AND THE PEACE PROCESS IN CENTRAL AMERICA: THE CONTADORA’S SHORTSIGHT By Maj Ayala Divassi, Rafael 12 May 2014 This paper was written by a student attending La présente étude a été rédigée par un stagiaire the Canadian Forces College in fulfilment of du Collège des Forces canadiennes pour one of the requirements of the Course of satisfaire à l'une des exigences du cours. Studies. The paper is a scholastic document, L'étude est un document qui se rapporte au and thus contains facts and opinions, which the cours et contient donc des faits et des opinions author alone considered appropriate and que seul l'auteur considère appropriés et correct for the subject. It does not necessarily convenables au sujet.
    [Show full text]
  • Organising the South American Space Regionalism in Times of Transnationalisation
    Organising the South American Space Regionalism in times of transnationalisation Stefano Palestini Céspedes Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of Political and Social Sciences of the European University Institute Florence, 13 October 2015 (thesis defence) European University Institute Department of Political and Social Sciences Organising the South American Space Regionalism in times of transnationalisation Stefano Palestini Céspedes Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of Political and Social Sciences of the European University Institute Examining Board Prof. László Bruszt, EUI (Supervisor) Prof. Carlos Closa Montero, EUI Prof. Olivier Dabène, Sciences Po Prof. Juan Gabriel Valdés Soublette, Government of Chile - Universidad Austral ©Stefano Palestini Céspedes, 2015 No part of this thesis may be copied, reproduced or transmitted without prior permission of the author To Amanda and Mario. Abstract What makes governments decide to engage in cooperation with their neighbours to deliver regional public goods? Under which conditions do they decide to keep this cooperation informal, and when do they instead prefer to formalise it through an international treaty? Why do government seem to be more capable to produce regional public goods in some policy-areas than in others? The present research addresses these questions by analysing the contemporary South American-wide regionalism from 2000 to 2014, the period in which the Initiative for the Integration of Regional
    [Show full text]
  • Latin American Program Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars
    Number 228 THE CHANGES IN THE INTER-AMERICAN SYSTEM IN THE 1990s Ana Julia Faya Researcher at Centro Félix Varela Latin American Program Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Copyright June 1997 1 This publication is one of a series of Working Papers of the Latin American Program of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. The series includes papers in the humanities and social sciences from Program fellows, guest scholars, workshops, colloquia, and conferences. The series aims to extend the Program's discussions to a wider community throughout the Americas, to help authors obtain timely criticism of work in progress, and to provide, directly or indirectly, scholarly and intellectual context for contemporary policy concerns. Single copies of Working Papers may be obtained without charge by writing to: Latin American Program Working Papers The Woodrow Wilson Center 1000 Jefferson Drive, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20560 The Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars was created by Congress in 1968 as a "living institution expressing the ideals and concerns of Woodrow Wilson, symbolizing and strengthening the fruitful relations between the world of learning and the world of public affairs." The Center's Latin American Program was established in 1977. LATIN AMERICAN PROGRAM STAFF Joseph S. Tulchin, Director Cynthia Arnson, Senior Program Associate Allison M. Garland, Program Associate Ralph H. Espach, Research Assistant Michelle Granson, Program Assistant Audrey Donaldson, Program Aide 2 INTRODUCTION This paper represents the fruit of the work done by Ana Julia Faya, a member of the first "class" of Latin American Junior Scholars participating in the Junior Scholars Training Program, a competitive scholarship offered by the Latin American Program at the Woodrow Wilson International Center Scholars, with the generous support of The Ford Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • New Approaches to Migration Management in Mexico and Central America by Francisco Alba and Manuel Ángel Castillo the Regional Migration Study Group
    THE REGIONAL MIGRATION STUDY GROUP NEW APPROACHES TO MIGRATION ManaGEMENT IN MEXICO anD CENTRAL AMERICA By Francisco Alba and Manuel Ángel Castillo THE REGIONAL MIGRATION STUDY GrOUP NEW APPROACHES TO MIGRATION ManaGEMENT IN MEXICO anD CENTRAL AMERICA Francisco Alba and Manuel Ángel Castillo El Colegio de México October 2012 Acknowledgments While the two authors share responsibility for the contents of this report, Francisco Alba assumes a greater share of responsibility for the analysis on Mexico and Manuel Ángel Castillo does so for the Central American country case studies. Both authors’ exchange of ideas and discussion are reflected to a greater degree in the sections covering the repercussions of Mexico’s law on migration and the discussion of regional migration issues. This research has been made possible through the generous support of the Tinker Foundation, the MacArthur Foundation, and the Open Society Foundations. This report was produced for the October 2011 meeting of the Regional Migration Study Group convened by the Migration Policy Institute (MPI) and the Latin American Program of the Woodrow Wilson Center. The Study Group, a three-year initiative, will act as a virtual think tank to the policymakers and civil-society officials in the United States, Mexico, and Central America who manage day-to-day migration relations and other issues related to human capital and global competitiveness. The Study Group’s mission, membership, and research can be found at: www.migrationpolicy.org/regionalstudygroup. © 2012 Migration Policy Institute. All Rights Reserved. Cover Photo: Modified version of North American map (2725801) – BigStockPhoto.com Cover Design: Burke Speaker, MPI Typesetting: April Siruno, MPI No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Migration Policy Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Central America's Recent Development
    ANNEX: CENTRAL AMERICA’S RECENT DEVELOPMENT _____________________________________________________________________________ CENTRAL AMERICA’S RECENT DEVELOPMENT Following is a brief description of how development, in its diverse aspects, has taken place within the Central American context throughout the most recent decades, with a view to more clearly understand the needs to transform and modernize the economies and societies of the region. PEACE AND DEMOCRACY During the eighties Central America was immersed in the deepest crisis of its history. Combined with the economic situation – which will be discussed in the following section – the fragility of the democratic processes in some of the countries, and the armed confrontations in Guatemala, El Salvador and Nicaragua, affected the region as a whole. The deterioration of social conditions and of economic development, as well as setbacks in the regional integration process, produced tensions between the States, and massive migratory movements occurred within and outside Central America. The “lost decade” for the entire Latin American region superimposed itself over the accumulated historical gaps and the political, social and economic roots of the Central American situation. The confrontation between the great powers involved Central America in their disputes. In spite of the above, at the beginning of 1983, a Latin American initiative took place to seek pacific solutions to the Central American conflicts. The Contadora Group - integrated by the governments of Mexico, Venezuela, Colombia and Panama - to which the Support Group, comprised of Argentina, Brazil, Peru and Uruguay, was added later on, headed it. These initiatives highlighted the linkage between the pacification and democratization processes and the vision of inter- dependence between peace and development.
    [Show full text]