DOCSLIB.ORG

{PDF EPUB} the Sons of Bayezid (Ottoman Empire and Its Heritage) by D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
{PDF EPUB} the Sons of Bayezid (Ottoman Empire and Its Heritage) by D Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} The Sons of Bayezid (Ottoman Empire and Its Heritage) by D. This book is the first detailed reconstruction of the events and political culture of the Ottoman civil war of 142-1413. After Timur defeated the Ottomans at the Battle of Ankara and dismembered their empire, the sons of Bayezid the Thunderbolt fought bloody battles for his throne, using literature and other means to justify their claims against each other.Cited by: 15Author: Dimitris J. Kastritsis4.5/5(2)Publish Year: 2007Images of the Sons of Bayezid Ottoman Empire and Its Heritage B… bing.com/imagesSee allSee all imagesThe Sons of Bayezid (Ottoman Empire and Its Heritage ...https://epdf.pub/the-sons-of-bayezid-ottoman-empire-and-its-heritage.htmlOn one side was the army of Timur (Tamerlane, r. 1370– 1405), “the last of the great nomad conquerors,” who had spent the two preceding decades building a vast empire on the Mongol model.1 On the other was that of the Ottoman ruler Bayezid I ‘the Thunderbolt’ (Yıldırım, r. 1389–1402), who styled himself “Sultan of Rum” (Sul.t ... Empire Building and Representation in the Ottoman Civil War of 1402-13. Series: The Ottoman Empire and its Heritage, Volume: 38. Author: Dimitris Kastritsis. The civil war of 1402-1413 is one of the most complicated and fascinating periods in Ottoman history. It is often called the interregnum because of its political instability, but that term does not do justice to the fact that the civil war was a chapter of Ottoman history in its …Cited by: 15Publish Year: 2007Author: Dimitris J. KastritsisReleased on: October 30, 2007People also askHow did Bayezid II consolidate the Ottoman Empire?How did Bayezid II consolidate the Ottoman Empire?During his reign, Bayezid II consolidated the Ottoman Empire and thwarted a Safavid rebellion soon before abdicating his throne to his son, Selim I.Bayezid II Ii, Sultan of the Ottoman Empire (1447 - 1512 ... Nov 02, 2007 · This book is the first detailed reconstruction of the events and political culture of the Ottoman civil war of 1402-1413. After Timur defeated the Ottomans at … The Sons of Bayezid: Empire Building and Representation in the Ottoman Civil War of 1402-1413. The Sons of Bayezid. : Dimitris J. Kastritsis. BRILL, 2007 - History - 250 pages. 0 Reviews. The civil... By force of armes stout Mahomet his father’s kingdome gaines, And doth the broken state thereof repaire with restlesse paines. What so the force of Tamerlane had from his father Nov 02, 2017 · Rise of the Ottoman Empire By 1517, Bayezid’s son, Selim I, brought Syria, Arabia, Palestine, and Egypt under Ottoman control. The Ottoman Empire reached its peak between 1520 and 1566, during the... The Sons of Bayezid Empire Building and Representation in the Ottoman Civil War of 1402-13 Series: The Ottoman Empire and its Heritage, Volume: 38; E-Book ISBN: 9789047422471 Publisher: Brill Online Publication Date: ... Bayezid II was the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire and the eldest son of Mehmed II the Conqueror. Although he remained in the shadow of his father, Bayezid managed to consolidate the position of the Empire in Anatolia and the Balkans, conquer the Peloponnesus and suppress the rebellion of the Safavid dynasty. He is most famous for admitting the Jews and Muslims that were expeled from Spain in 1492 … Black Sea would very soon be a subject of international diplomacy and law instead of being the subject of Ottoman domestic jurisdiction. 13For the interregnum period see: Fahamettin Başar, "Fetret Devri", TDV İA. V. XII., İstanbul, 1995, pp. 480-482. and Dimitris J. Kastritsis, The Sons of Bayezid Empire Building and Representation in the ... the sons of bayezid ottoman empire and its heritage Feb 02, 2021. Posted By Harold Robbins Ltd TEXT ID 151a8653. Online PDF Ebook Epub Library. Introduction To Differential Calculus Systematic Studies With Engineering Applications For Beginners The Sons of Bayezid: Empire Building and Representation in the Ottoman Civil War of 1402-13 (Ottoman Empire & its Heritage) Hardcover – 15 Oct. 2007 by Dimitris Kastritsis (Author) The Sons of Bayezid: Empire Building and Representation in ... However, this is a solid history book, covering only the civil war fought between the Ottoman Sultan Bayezid's sons, after Bayezid was captured by Tamerlane in 1402. The sons names were Suleyman, Musa, Isa, and Mehmed, and Mehmed would end the winner, even though it appeared that Suleyman had all of the advantages, since he controlled the capital city (Brusa/Bursa), and he had the largest army.4.5/5The Ottoman Empire: 600 Years of Domination – The Muslim Timeshttps://themuslimtimes.info/2020/02/17/the-ottoman...Feb 17, 2020 · The period between 1402 and 1413 is known today as the Interregnum, during which four of Bayezid’s sons competed with each other for control of the entire empire. Ultimately, it was Mehmed I, the fourth son of Bayezid, who triumphed, and reunified the Ottoman Empire. Following this reunification, the Ottoman Empire continued its expansion. Jul 10, 2019 · With Bayezid’s loss, the Ottoman Empire was saved from total destruction by weakness in Europe and Tamerlane’s return east. The sons of Bayezid were able to not only take control but fight a civil war over it; Musa Bey, Isa Bey, and Süleyman were defeated by Mehmed I. Ottoman Sultans: Sultan Bayezid II (1481-1512) "The Saint" Highlights of Bayezid II's reign • oldest son of Mehmed II, fought civil war with younger brother Jem after father's death-Jem becomes exile on Rhodes • builds up Ottoman navy to counter future crusades and supremacy in the Mediterranean -engage in piracy as 'sea Ghazis' Bayezid II, Ottoman sultan (1481–1512) who consolidated Ottoman rule in the Balkans, Anatolia, and the eastern Mediterranean and was the first Ottoman sultan challenged by the Safavid empire. Under pressure from his advisers and Janissary corps amid a succession crisis, he abdicated in 1512 in favor of his son … Padişah Portreleri (Portraits of the Ottoman Empire's Sultans). Volume I. Sirkeci, Istanbul: Association of Historical Research and Istanbul Research Centre. ISBN 9789756926079. OCLC 248496159. Findley, Carter V., ed (2005) (in Turkish). The Turks in World History. New York: Oxford University Press US. ISBN 9780195177268. OCLC 54529318. Bāyezīd-i sānī, Turkish:II.Bayezid or II.Beyazıt) was the oldest son and ﺑﺎﯾﺰﯾﺪ ﺛﺎﻧﻰ :Bayezid II (Dec 3, 1447 – May 26, 1512) (Ottoman Turkish successor of Mehmed II, ruling as Sultan of the Ottoman Empire … Bayezid II, the eldest son of Mehmed, became the new Sultan after he died in 1481. THE RISE OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE. Selim I, the son of Bayezid, brought Syria, Arabia, Palestine, and Egypt under Ottoman control in 1517. During the reign of Suleiman the Magnificent, the Ottoman Empire was able to reach its peak by 1520 and 1566. 5 On the Ottoman civil war, see Dimitris Kastritsis, The Sons of Bayezid: Empire Building and Representation in the Ottoman Civil War of 1402— 1413, The Ottoman Empire and its Heritage 38 (Leiden and Boston, 2007). On the immediate aftermath of the battle of Ankara, see pp. 44—78. Oct 24, 2016 · The ottoman empire was known as something called a frontier empire which means they were made up of many ethnicities and religions. The Siege. In 1453 The ottoman’s started a siege on the city of Constantinople. This Siege went on for 6 weeks. The byzantine empire could not keep them away. In what he calls “an innovative, even revolutionary” history, Mikhail draws on world-spanning source material to demonstrate the enormous, long- felt influence of the Islamic empire under Ottoman sultans Mehmet II, who captured Constantinople in 1453; and his son Bayezid and grandson Selim who tripled the empire's territory. THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE AND ITS FRONTIERS 15 44 Shai Har-El, Struggle for Domination in the Middle East: The Ottoman-Mamluk War 1485-1491 (Leiden: Brill, 1995). 45 See, for example, İdris-i Bidlisi, Selim Şah-name, trans. Hicabi Kılangıç (Ankara: Kültür Bakanlıgı, 2001), 303. 46 Marc D. Baer, Honored by the Glory of Islam: Conversion and ... Mar 14, 2017 · Bayezid passed away in New York on January 7 at the age of 92. He never married. The Ottoman dynasty ruled an empire that once stretched from the deserts of Saudi Arabia to the border of Vienna. After a 600-year reign, it went into decline in the 1800s. The final blow to the dying empire was the loss of large parts of its territory in World War I. ^ Dimitris J. Kastritsis, The Sons of Bayezid: Empire Building and Representation in the Ottoman Civil War of 1402-13, (Brill, 2007), 5. ^ Dimitris J. Kastritsis,1-3. ^ Shaw, History of the Ottoman Empire , … Oct 14, 2020 · With this battle, Serbia had become a vassal of the Ottoman Empire. A year later, Bayezid took as a wife Princess Olivera Despina, the daughter of Prince Lazar of Serbia, who also lost his life in Kosovo. Bayezid recognized Stefan Lazarević, the son of Lazar, as the new Serbian leader (later despot), with considerable autonomy. Danubian campaign Timeline of important events in the history of the Ottoman Empire. Created by Turkish tribes in Anatolia (Asia Minor), the empire grew to be one of the most powerful states in the world during the 15th and 16th centuries. The Ottoman period spanned more than 600 years and came to an end in 1922. May 18, 2019 · The Ottoman Empire extended its control through the Balkans. Timur, a Turco-Mongol leader, invaded the empire from the east and defeated Bayezid I at the Battle of Ankara in 1402. This resulted in a civil war between Bayezid's sons for over 10 years and the loss of Balkan territories.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Selim I–Mehmet Vi)
    CHRONOLOGY (SELIM I–MEHMET VI) Years of Sultan Important dates reign 1512–1520 Selim I Conquest of Egypt, Selim assumes the title of Caliph (1517) 1520–1566 Süleyman Vienna sieged (1529); War with Venice (1537–1540); Annexation of Hungary (1541) 1566–1574 Selim II Ottoman navy loses the battle of Lepanto (1571) 1574–1595 Murad III Janissary revolts (1589 and 1591–1592) 1595–1603 Mehmed III War with Austria continues (1595– ) 1603–1617 Ahmed I War with Austria ends; Buda is recovered (1604) 1617–1622 Osman II Janissaries murder Osman (1622) 1622–1623 Mustafa I Janissary Revolt (1622) 1623–1640 Murad IV Baghdad recovered (1638); War with Iran (1624–1639) 1640–1648 İbrahim I War with Venice (1645); Assassination of İbrahim (1648) 1648–1687 Mehmed IV Janissary dominance in Istanbul and anar- chy (1649–1651); War with Venice continues (1663); War with Austria, and siege of Vienna (1683) 1687–1691 Süleyman II Janissary revolt (1687); Austria’s occupation of Belgrade (1688) 1691–1695 Ahmed II War with Austria (1694) 1695–1703 Mustafa II Treaty of Karlowitz (1699); Janissary revolt and deposition of Mustafa (1703) 1703–1730 Ahmed III Refuge of Karl XII (1709); War with Venice (1714–1718); War with Austria (1716); Treaty of Passarowitz (1718); ix x REFORMING OTTOMAN GOVERNANCE Tulip Era (1718–1730) 1730–1754 Mahmud I War with Russia and Austria (1736–1759) 1754–1774 Mustafa III War with Russia (1768); Russian Fleet in the Aegean (1770); Inva- sion of the Crimea (1771) 1774–1789 Abdülhamid I Treaty of Küçük Kaynarca (1774); War with Russia (1787)
    [Show full text]
  • The Aegean Expeditions of Bayezid Ii (H. 903-906/1498-1500) (The Conquest of Lepanto, Modon, Koron, and Navarino)
    THE AEGEAN EXPEDITIONS OF BAYEZİD II (H. 903-906/1498-1500) (THE CONQUEST OF LEPANTO, MODON, KORON, AND NAVARINO) E M E L E SÎN * The detailed sources, distinct from the Ottoman chronicles and naval histories, to vvhich references vvill be made, are mainly the follovving: A biography of Bâyezîd II, Târîkh-i Sultân Bâyezîd, 1 to be shortly mentioned as the Târîkh is an anonymous manuscript, vvritten in the reign of Selim I (H. 918-26/1512-20). The vvork is illustrated vvith paintings, of equally unknovvn artists, apparently familiar vvith the related topography. The Târîkh, 2 as vvell as other documents3 narrate that Bâyezîd II ordered the construction of fortifications, on the sea-shores and the frontier regions, and planned expeditions, along the Black Sea and Aegean sea, then called in Turkish Jezâ’ir (the Islands). In the latter area, the Sultan vvanted to dis- mantle the strongholds of Mora (Morea) from vvhere attacks and landings on Ottoman soil vvere started. Hovvever, the Ottoman fleet had to be first strengthened. Nevv ships vvere built by the renovvned sailor ghâzî (combatant for the faith) Kemal Re’îs. 4 It should be noted, in brackets, that the translation of the term ghâzî, as pirate, is erroneous. The Ottoman ghâzîs, on land and sea, vvere semi-religious fraternities o f vvarriors, vvho, in the vvords of the oath taken at the * Dr. Emel Esin is historian of art, especially of Turkish medieval Central Asian Art. 1 Ms R. 1272 of the Topkapu Palace Museum Library, fol. 63 (the biog­ raphy was vvritten under Selim I).
    [Show full text]
  • Mongol Aristocrats and Beyliks in Anatolia
    MONGOL ARISTOCRATS AND BEYLIKS IN ANATOLIA. A STUDY OF ASTARĀBĀDĪ’S BAZM VA RAZM* Jürgen Paul Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg Abstract This paper is about beyliks – political entities that include at least one town (or a major fortress or both), its agricultural hinterland and a (large) amounts of pasture. It is also about Mongols in Anatolia in the beylik period (in particular the second half of the 14th century) and their leading families some of whom are presented in detail. The paper argues that the Eretna sultanate, the Mongol successor state in Anatolia, underwent a drawn-out fission process which resulted in a number of beyliks. Out of this number, at least one beylik had Mongol leaders. Besides, the paper argues that Mongols and their leading families were much more important in this period than had earlier been assumed. arge parts of Anatolia came under Mongol rule earlier than western Iran. The Mongols had won a resounding victory over the Rum L Seljuqs at Köse Dağ in 1243, and Mongols then started occupying winter and summer pastures in Central and Eastern Anatolia, pushing the Turks and Türkmens to the West and towards the coastal mountain ranges. Later, Mongol Anatolia became part of the Ilkhanate, and this province was one of the focal points of Ilkhanid politics and intrigues.1 The first troops, allegedly three tümens, had already been dispatched to Anatolia by ———— * Research for this paper was conducted in the framework of Sonderforschungsbereich 586 (“Differenz und Integration”, see www.nomadsed.de), hosted by the universities at Halle-Wittenberg and Leipzig and funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd 15.04.27 Versie 3
    Promotor Prof. dr. Jan Dumolyn Vakgroep Geschiedenis Decaan Prof. dr. Marc Boone Rector Prof. dr. Anne De Paepe Nederlandse vertaling: Een Spiegel voor de Sultan. Staatsideologie in de Vroeg Osmaanse Kronieken, 1300-1453 Kaftinformatie: Miniature of Sultan Orhan Gazi in conversation with the scholar Molla Alâeddin. In: the Şakayıku’n-Nu’mâniyye, by Taşköprülüzâde. Source: Topkapı Palace Museum, H1263, folio 12b. Faculteit Letteren & Wijsbegeerte Hilmi Kaçar A Mirror for the Sultan State Ideology in the Early Ottoman Chronicles, 1300- 1453 Proefschrift voorgelegd tot het behalen van de graad van Doctor in de Geschiedenis 2015 Acknowledgements This PhD thesis is a dream come true for me. Ottoman history is not only the field of my research. It became a passion. I am indebted to Prof. Dr. Jan Dumolyn, my supervisor, who has given me the opportunity to take on this extremely interesting journey. And not only that. He has also given me moral support and methodological guidance throughout the whole process. The frequent meetings to discuss the thesis were at times somewhat like a wrestling match, but they have always been inspiring and stimulating. I also want to thank Prof. Dr. Suraiya Faroqhi and Prof. Dr. Jo Vansteenbergen, for their expert suggestions. My colleagues of the History Department have also been supportive by letting me share my ideas in development during research meetings at the department, lunches and visits to the pub. I would also like to sincerely thank the scholars who shared their ideas and expertise with me: Dimitris Kastritsis, Feridun Emecen, David Wrisley, Güneş Işıksel, Deborah Boucayannis, Kadir Dede, Kristof d’Hulster, Xavier Baecke and many others.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkomans Between Two Empires
    TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ORIGINS OF THE QIZILBASH IDENTITY IN ANATOLIA (1447-1514) A Ph.D. Dissertation by RIZA YILDIRIM Department of History Bilkent University Ankara February 2008 To Sufis of Lāhijan TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ORIGINS OF THE QIZILBASH IDENTITY IN ANATOLIA (1447-1514) The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University by RIZA YILDIRIM In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BILKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA February 2008 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. …………………….. Assist. Prof. Oktay Özel Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. …………………….. Prof. Dr. Halil Đnalcık Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. …………………….. Prof. Dr. Ahmet Yaşar Ocak Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. …………………….. Assist. Prof. Evgeni Radushev Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Turks and Europe by Gaston Gaillard London: Thomas Murby & Co
    THE TURKS AND EUROPE BY GASTON GAILLARD LONDON: THOMAS MURBY & CO. 1 FLEET LANE, E.C. 1921 1 vi CONTENTS PAGES VI. THE TREATY WITH TURKEY: Mustafa Kemal’s Protest—Protests of Ahmed Riza and Galib Kemaly— Protest of the Indian Caliphate Delegation—Survey of the Treaty—The Turkish Press and the Treaty—Jafar Tayar at Adrianople—Operations of the Government Forces against the Nationalists—French Armistice in Cilicia—Mustafa Kemal’s Operations—Greek Operations in Asia Minor— The Ottoman Delegation’s Observations at the Peace Conference—The Allies’ Answer—Greek Operations in Thrace—The Ottoman Government decides to sign the Treaty—Italo-Greek Incident, and Protests of Armenia, Yugo-Slavia, and King Hussein—Signature of the Treaty – 169—271 VII. THE DISMEMBERMENT OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE: 1. The Turco-Armenian Question - 274—304 2. The Pan-Turanian and Pan-Arabian Movements: Origin of Pan-Turanism—The Turks and the Arabs—The Hejaz—The Emir Feisal—The Question of Syria—French Operations in Syria— Restoration of Greater Lebanon—The Arabian World and the Caliphate—The Part played by Islam - 304—356 VIII. THE MOSLEMS OF THE FORMER RUSSIAN EMPIRE AND TURKEY: The Republic of Northern Caucasus—Georgia and Azerbaïjan—The Bolshevists in the Republics of Caucasus and of the Transcaspian Isthmus—Armenians and Moslems - 357—369 IX. TURKEY AND THE SLAVS: Slavs versus Turks—Constantinople and Russia - 370—408 2 THE TURKS AND EUROPE I THE TURKS The peoples who speak the various Turkish dialects and who bear the generic name of Turcomans, or Turco-Tatars, are distributed over huge territories occupying nearly half of Asia and an important part of Eastern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Formation of Hilya Design Calligraphy-Illumination Interaction and Numeral Symbolism
    Kafkas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Kafkas University Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences Sonbahar Autumn 2019, Ek Sayı Additional Number 2, 155-176 DOI:10.9775/kausbed.2019.024 Gönderim Tarihi: 15.08.2019 Kabul Tarihi: 02.09.2019 NOTES ON THE FORMATION OF HILYA DESIGN: CALLIGRAPHY-ILLUMINATION INTERACTION AND NUMERAL SYMBOLISM Hilye Tasarımının Oluşumuna İlişkin Notlar: Hat-Tezhip Etkileşimi ve Sayı Sembolizmi Gülnihal KÜPELİ Dr. Öğr. Üyesi, Marmara Üniversitesi Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi, [email protected] ORCID ID: 0000-0002-2055-0427 Çalışmanın Türü: Araştırma Abstract: In Ottoman tradition of thought the Prophet Muhammad represents the complete human being (al-insan al-kamil), who has reached the highest psychological, physical and spiritual stage of being. In this case the main purpose of the hilya as a work of calligraphy and illumination is to aesthetically evoke the physical appearance and moral character of the Prophet Muhammad. Moreover, the complex symbolism of the hilya as an expression of prophetic glory also reflects the cosmological thought of the Ottoman community. The subject of this article is to examine the classical hilya design attributed to the famous Ottoman calligrapher Hâfiz Osman in the context of calligraphy-illumination interaction and number symbolism. Examining classical examples of Turkish-Islamic arts of the book, we will try to observe that the conventional hilya design passed through various stages during the process of its formation. In this case the theoretical roots of Hâfiz Osman’s hilya form and the probability of his inspiration by the aesthetic designs of the previous periods will be examined through the decorative manuscripts in religious and non- religious topics.
    [Show full text]
  • Ottoman Holy War to the North of the Danube Full Article Language: En Indien Anders: Engelse Articletitle: 0
    _full_alt_author_running_head (neem stramien B2 voor dit chapter en nul 0 in hierna): 0 _full_articletitle_deel (kopregel rechts, vul hierna in): Ottoman Holy War to the North of the Danube _full_article_language: en indien anders: engelse articletitle: 0 54 Chapter 3 Chapter 3 Ottoman Holy War to the North of the Danube 1 Efforts to the Way of Allah Initially, as vassals of the Seljukid sultans, the Anatolian beys, including the fledging Ottoman dynasty, accompanied their suzerains in holy campaigns (gaza) against Byzantine territories.1 Adopting the ideology of cihad, the Ot­ toman sultans assumed for themselves the task of leaders of the holy war against infidels of Southeastern Europe. This idea was directly and most cate­ gorically declared in “letters of conquest” (fetihnames), accounts of victorious campaigns against unbelievers, distributed both domestically and abroad by the sultans. The most relevant examples of this genre are to be found in Meh­ med II’s statements in letters sent to Muslim rulers.2 Furthermore, both Byzan­ tine and Ottoman sources indicate that sultans were conscious of their obligation to conduct cihad. For instance, in 1421, after Mehmed I’s death, as Nişancı Mehmed paşa informs us, his son, Gazi Sultan Murad Han, came to the imperial throne. Murad Han did not abandon but rather followed the right way, hoisted the banners of the holy campaign and the holy war (gaza ü-cihad bayraklarını yücelten) and confided in the glorious Allah.3 Step by step, but especially after the conquest of Arab territories, the image of sultans as leaders of holy wars was recognized across the Muslim world.4 In the sixteenth century, stereotypes dominated the image of the sultan as a holy warrior.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Ottoman Empire on the Conservation of the Architectural Heritage in Jerusalem
    Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies Vol. 10, no. 1 (2020), pp. 127-151, doi : 10.18326/ijims.v10i1. 127-151 The Influence of Ottoman Empire on the conservation of the architectural heritage in Jerusalem Ziad M. Shehada University of Malaya E-mail: [email protected] DOI: 10.18326/ijims.v10i1.127-151 Abstract Jerusalem is one of the oldest cities in the world. It was built by the Canaanites in 3000 B.C., became the first Qibla of Muslims and is the third holiest shrine after Mecca and Medina. It is believed to be the only sacred city in the world that is considered historically and spiritually significant to Muslims, Christians, and Jews alike. Since its establishment, the city has been subjected to a series of changes as a result of political, economic and social developments that affected the architectural formation through successive periods from the beginning leading up to the Ottoman Era, which then achieved relative stability. The research aims to examine and review the conservation mechanisms of the architectural buildings during the Ottoman rule in Jerusalem for more than 400 years, and how the Ottoman Sultans contributed to revitalizing and protecting the city from loss and extinction. The researcher followed the historical interpretive method using descriptive analysis based on a literature review and preliminary study to determine Ottoman practices in conserving the historical and the architectural heritage of Jerusalem. The research found that the Ottoman efforts towards conserving the architectural heritage in Jerusalem fell into four categories (Renovation, Restoration, Reconstruction, and Rehabilitation). The Ottomans 127 IJIMS: Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, Volume 10, Number 1, June 2020:127-151 focused on the conservation of the existing buildings rather than new construction because of their respect for the local traditions and holy places.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Suraiya N
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-62094-9 - The Cambridge History of Turkey: The Ottoman Empire as a World Power, 1453–1603: Volume 2 Edited by Suraiya N. Faroqhi and Kate Fleet Excerpt More information 1 Introduction Suraiya N. Faroqhi Of the Ottoman Empire we can say what Friedrich Schiller (1759–1805) once wrote about the seventeenth-century military commander and entrepreneur Albrecht von Wallenstein (in Czech, Albrecht Václav Eusebius z Valdštejna, 1583–1634). According to Schiller’s verse, the favour and hate of [conflict- ing] parties had caused confusion, producing a highly variable image of Wallenstein’s character in history. Put differently, it was the diverging per- spectives of the beholders that gave rise to this instability. Admittedly, being a poet, Schiller made his point far more concisely than the present author is able to do.1 In certain traditions of historiography in the Balkans and elsewhere as well, denigrating the Ottoman Empire and making it responsible for all man- ner of “backwardness” is still widespread, although challenges to this view have been mounting during the last 30 years. On the other hand, romanti- cising the images of Mehmed the Conqueror (r. 1451–81) or Süleyman the Magnificent (r. 1520–66) is also quite a popular enterprise: witness the statue of Mehmed II in downtown Istanbul – a new one is in the planning stage – and the double monument to Zrínyi Miklós and Sultan Süleyman in a park of Szigetvar, Hungary. To claim “objectivity” means to deceive oneself and others, but the authors of the present volume, whatever their views, have all clearly tried to distin- guish the points made by the primary sources from the interpretations that they propose as historians of the twenty-first century.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplomacy Might Be As Old As Politics Which Is As Old As State and People and As Long As the Debate of “We” and “Them” Existed, the Concept Is Likely to Prolong
    UNDERSTANDING THE REFORM PROCESS OF THE OTTOMAN DIPLOMACY: A CASE OF MODERNIZATION? A THESIS SUBMITTED TO GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY CEM ERÜLKER IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF EUROPEAN STUDIES DECEMBER 2015 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science Asst. Prof. Dr Galip Yalman Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science/ Asst. Prof. Dr Sevilay Kahraman Supervisor Examining Committee Members Yrd. Doç. Dr. Mustafa S. Palabıyık (TOBB ETU/IR) Doç. Dr. Sevilay Kahraman (METU/IR) Doç. Dr. Galip Yalman (METU/ADM) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Cem Erülker Signature : iii ABSTRACT UNDERSTANDING THE REFORM PROCESS OF THE OTTOMAN DIPLOMACY : A CASE OF MODERNIZATION? Erülker, Cem MS., Department of European Studies Supervisor Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sevilay Kahraman December 2015, 97 pages The reasons that forced the Ottoman Empire to change its conventional method of diplomacy starting from late 18th century will be examined in this Thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • TEZHĠB KAYNAKÇASI (1) Bülent Ağaoğlu 3.12.2018
    TEZHĠB KAYNAKÇASI (1) Bülent Ağaoğlu 3.12.2018 1 Ġçindekiler KAYNAKÇA .......................................................................................................................................... 3 KĠTAPLAR ............................................................................................................................................ 3 TEZLER ................................................................................................................................................ 3 MAKALELER ....................................................................................................................................... 15 GOOGLE ARAMALARI ......................................................................................................................... 38 2 KAYNAKÇA Bayram, Sadi. "Türk Hat, Yazı-Resim, Cilt , Tezhip ve Minyatür Sanatı ile ilgili SeçilmiĢ Bibliyografya." Vakıflar Dergisi, 23 (1994): 321-342. http://acikerisim.fsm.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11352/370#sthash.hwWV6TSK.dpbs Duran, Gülnur: “Bibliyografya”. Ġçinde: Tezhib. http://www.islamansiklopedisi.info/dia/pdf/c41/c410043.pdf KĠTAPLAR Konu: Tezhib. http://ktp.isam.org.tr/ Konu:Tezhip. http://ktp.isam.org.tr/ https://kasif.mkutup.gov.tr/ Konu: Tezhib. http://www.toplukatalog.gov.tr Konu: Tezhip. http://www.toplukatalog.gov.tr TEZLER Taranan; AHMET TAYLAN URAN * 2015 * Fatih Sultan Mehmed'e ithaflı beĢ yazma eserin bezeme analizi * The ornament analysis of five manuscripts dedicated to Fatih Sultan Mehmed * Marmara Üniversitesi * Yüksek
    [Show full text]