DOCSLIB.ORG

The Proceedings of TDWG Abstracts of the 2007 Annual Conference Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Proceedings of TDWG Abstracts of the 2007 Annual Conference Of The Proceedings of TDWG Abstracts of the 2007 Annual Conference of the Taxonomic Databases Working Group 16-22 September 2007 Bratislava, Slovakia (Hosted by the Faculty of Natural Science, Comenius University) Edited by Anna Weitzman and Lee Belbin Published by Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG) and the Missouri Botanical Garden St. Louis, 2007 TDWG 2007 sponsored by: © Taxonomic Databases Working Group, 2007 © Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A., 2007 © Cover design: Adrian Rissoné, 2007 To be cited as: Weitzman, A.L., and Belbin, L. (eds.). Proceedings of TDWG (2007), Bratislava, Slovakia. This book contains abstracts of the papers, posters and computer demonstrations presented at the Annual Conference of the Taxonomic Databases Working Group held 16-22 September 2007 at the SÚZA (Správa účelových zariadení) Conference Centre in Bratislava, Slovakia, hosted by the Faculty of Natural Science of the Comenius University. The meeting attracted more than 141 participants from 25 countries and 88 prestigious scientific research institutions, museums and companies. The editors acknowledge with thanks the contribution of Arturo Ariño, Reed Beaman, Lee Belbin, Walter Berendsohn, Stan Blum, Alex Chapman, Renato de Giovanni, Stinger Guala, Gregor Hagedorn, Donald Hobern, Roger Hyam, Gail Kampmeier, Jessie Kennedy, Éamonn O Tuama, Ricardo Pereira, Rich Pyle, Adrian Rissoné, Annie Simpson and Neil Thomson towards the editing of this publication, and also the numerous peer reviewers. Published and distributed as an Adobe® Portable Document Format (PDF) document for free download from the Conference web site at http://www.tdwg.org/conference2007/ ISBN 978-1-930723-71-9 Contents Session 1. Client's Perspectives: User Needs 1.1. EDIT needs Biodiversity Information Standards Walter G. Berendsohn, Markus Döring, Malte C. Ebach ........................................................ 9 1.2. Biodiversity Heritage Library: Progress & Potential Chris Freeland ....................................................................................................................... 10 1.3. One million species in the Catalogue of Life – a triumph for Species 2000 and ITIS, or for TDWG standards? Frank A. Bisby....................................................................................................................... 10 1.4. User Needs - The alpha and omega of system design Charles J.T. Copp .................................................................................................................. 11 1.5. Exploring the Brave New World of eTaxonomy Chuck Miller.......................................................................................................................... 12 Session 2. Client's Perspectives: Examples of TDWG Standards in Use 2.1. TDWG Standards in use within the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) Data Portal Tim Robertson....................................................................................................................... 13 2.2. Assessing the Threat of Invasive Species in South America: an ensemble modeling approach in support of data standards, integration, and dissemination Miguel Fernandez, Wendy Tejeda, Guillermo Duran, Adriana Rico, Christian Arias, Maria Laura Quintanilla, Alberto Pareja, Juan Carlos Chive, Monica Rivera, Healy Hamilton ................................................................................ 13 2.3. Results of a Needs Assessment Survey of the Global Invasive Species Information Network (GISIN) Annie Simpson, Jim Graham, Michael Browne, Hannu Saarenmaa, Elizabeth Sellers .................................................................................................................... 14 2.4. When Taxonomies Meet Observations: An Examination of Taxonomic Concepts used by the Observation Systems eBird and the Avian Knowledge Network Paul Edward Allen................................................................................................................. 16 2.5. Taxonomists at work: relationships of process and data Anna Weitzman, Christopher Lyal ........................................................................................ 16 Session 3. Needed Technologies: Introductions and Demos 3.1. TDWG Standards Architecture - What and Why Roger Hyam........................................................................................................................... 18 3.2. Life Sciences Identifiers (LSID) and the Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG) Ricardo Scachetti Pereira.......................................................................................................19 3.3. Nala: A Semantic Data Capture Extension for Mozilla Firefox Ben Szekely, Ricardo Scachetti Pereira................................................................................. 19 3.4. Key Enabling Technologies: Transfer Protocols Donald Hobern ...................................................................................................................... 20 Session 4. Ontologies and Vocabularies: Atomizing biodiversity information 4.1. The Role of Ontologies in the TDWG Architecture Roger Hyam........................................................................................................................... 22 4.2. Integrating TDWG standards with EDIT’s Common Data Model Markus Döring, Andreas Müller, Ben Clark, Marc Geoffroy................................................ 23 Proceedings of TDWG (Biodiversity Information Standards) – 2007, Bratislava, Slovakia 3 4.3. ALTER-Net: A Data Ontology for LTER Observations and Measurements Kathi Schleidt ........................................................................................................................ 23 4.4. An ontological approach to describing and synthesizing ecological data, using a generalized model for “scientific observations” Mark Schildhauer, Matthew Jones, Joshua Madin, Shawn Bowers ...................................... 24 Session 5. LSIDs: Gluing it together to meet users' needs 5.1. LSIDs for Taxon Names: The ZooBank Experience Richard Pyle .......................................................................................................................... 26 5.2. LSID and TCS deployment in the Catalogue of Life Richard John White, Andrew C Jones, Ewen R Orme .......................................................... 26 5.3. An LSID authority for specimens and an LSID browsing client Kevin James Richards ........................................................................................................... 27 5.4. LSID policy and implementation in Australia Greg Whitbread, Alex R. Chapman, Ben Richardson ........................................................... 28 5.5. LSID Mashup Daniel Miranker..................................................................................................................... 29 Session 6. Enabling Technologies: Protocols 6.1. TapirLink: Facilitating the transition to TAPIR Renato De Giovanni ..............................................................................................................30 6.2. RDF over TAPIR Roger Hyam........................................................................................................................... 30 6.3. TAPIR networks in Australia’s Virtual Herbarium and the Atlas of Living Australia Greg Whitbread, Shunde Zhang, Paul Coddington ............................................................... 31 6.4. Checklist Provider Tool: a GBIF Application for Sharing Taxonomic Checklists Using TAPIR and TCS Wouter Addink, Jorrit van Hertum........................................................................................ 32 6.5. Shibboleth, a potential security framework for the TDWG architecture Lutz Suhrbier, Andreas Kohlbecker ...................................................................................... 32 Session 7. Models for Integrating TDWG: Species Profile Model 7.1. Main aspects of the Species Profile Model and the TDWG architecture Andreas Kohlbecker, Markus Döring, Andreas Müller......................................................... 33 7.2. Species Profile Model: Data integration lessons from GBIF Donald Hobern ...................................................................................................................... 33 7.3. SPM from an SDD perspective: Generality and extensibility Gregor Hagedorn ................................................................................................................... 34 7.4. Coming to Terms with SPM Robert A. Morris ................................................................................................................... 35 Session 8. Models for Integrating TDWG: Literature Model 8.1. Linking Bibliographic Data to Library Content Julius Welby .......................................................................................................................... 36 8.2. Use cases from taxonomists, conservationists, and others Cynthia Sims Parr, Christopher Lyal..................................................................................... 36 8.3. Progress in making literature easily accessible: schemas and marking up Terry Catapano, Anna Weitzman .......................................................................................... 37 8.4. Literature & interoperability: a working example using Ants Donat Agosti, Terry Catapano, Guido Sautter....................................................................... 38 8.5. Taxonomic Literature:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A World Flora Online by 2020: a Discussion Document on Plans for the Achievement of Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation by 2020
    CBD Distr. GENERAL UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/16/INF/38 23 April 2012 ENGLISH ONLY SUBSIDIARY BODY ON SCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL ADVICE Sixteenth meeting Montreal, 30 April-5 May 2012 Item 8 of the provisional agenda* GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR PLANT CONSERVATION: WORLD FLORA ONLINE BY 2020 Note by the Executive Secretary 1. In decision X/17 the Conference of the Parties adopted the consolidated update of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC) 2011-2020, with sixteen updated global targets for plant conservation, including Target 1 of developing, by 2020, an online Flora of all known plants. 2. This document provides a report for information to the participants of sixteenth meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice on steps taken to develop a ―World Flora online‖, its relevance for the implementation of the Convention and for the achievement of the other targets of the GSPC. 3. The document, prepared jointly by the Missouri Botanical Garden, the New York Botanical Garden, the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, and the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, is presented in the form and language in which it was received by the Secretariat. * UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/16/1. I order to minimize the environmental impacts of the Secretariat’s processes, and to contribute to the Secretary-General’s initiative for a C-Neutral UN, this document is printed in limited numbers. Delegates are kindly requested to bring their copies to meetings and not to request additional copies. UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/16/INF/38 Page 2 A World Flora Online by 2020: a discussion document on plans for the achievement of Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation by 2020 Presented to the Sixteenth meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, 30 April – 5 May 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Plant Diversity for Threat Elements: a Case Study of Nargu Wildlife Sanctuary, North Western Himalaya
    Ceylon Journal of Science 46(1) 2017: 75-95 DOI: http://doi.org/10.4038/cjs.v46i1.7420 RESEARCH ARTICLE Assessment of plant diversity for threat elements: A case study of Nargu wildlife sanctuary, north western Himalaya Pankaj Sharma*, S.S. Samant and Manohar Lal G.B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment and Sustainable Development, Himachal Unit, Mohal- Kullu-175126, H.P., India Received: 12/07/2016; Accepted: 16/02/2017 Abstract: Biodiversity crisis is being experienced losses, over exploitation, invasions of non-native throughout the world, due to various anthropogenic species, global climate change (IUCN, 2003) and and natural factors. Therefore, it is essential to disruption of community structure (Novasek and identify suitable conservation priorities in biodiversity Cleland, 2001). As a result of the anthropogenic rich areas. For this myriads of conservational pressure, the plant extinction rate has reached approaches are being implemented in various ecosystems across the globe. The present study has to137 species per day (Mora et al., 2011; Tali et been conducted because of the dearth of the location- al., 2015). At present, the rapid loss of species is specific studies in the Indian Himalayas for assessing estimated to be between 1,000–10,000 times the ‘threatened species’. The threat assessment of faster than the expected natural extinction rate plant species in the Nargu Wildlife Sanctuary (NWS) (Hilton-Taylor, 2000). Under the current of the northwest Himalaya was investigated using scenario, about 20% of all species are likely to Conservation Priority Index (CPI) during the present go extinct within next 30 years and more than study.
    [Show full text]
  • Establishment of a Global Network for the in Situ Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives: Status and Needs
    THEMATIC BACKGROUND STUDY Establishment of a Global Network for the In Situ Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives: Status and Needs Nigel Maxted and Shelagh Kell BACKGROUND STUDY PAPER NO. 39 October 2009 COMMISSION ON GENETIC RESOURCES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ESTABLISHMENT OF A GLOBAL NETWORK FOR THE IN SITU CONSERVATION OF CROP WILD RELATIVES: STATUS AND NEEDS by *By Nigel Maxted and Shelagh Kell The content of this document is entirely the responsibility of the authors, and does not .necessarily represent the views of the FAO, or its Members 2 * School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham. Disclaimer The content of this document is entirely the responsibility of the authors, and does not necessarily represent the views of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), or its Members. The designations employed and the presentation of material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of FAO concerning legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. CONTENTS SUMMARY 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 7 PART 1: INTRODUCTION 8 1.1 Background and scope 8 1.2 The global and local importance of crop wild relatives 10 1.3 Definition of a crop wild relative 12 1.4 Global numbers of crop
    [Show full text]
  • BRITISH BOTANICAL GARDENS in the 1980S
    BRITISH BOTANICAL GARDENS IN THE 1980s: CHANGES REFLECTED BY BIBLIOGRAPHICAL AND SOCIAL SURVEY Enid Constance Gilberthorpe Thesis submitted fox' the degree of PhD University of Sheffield Division of Education January 1987 cONTEN'rs PAGE NUMBER List of Contents :1. List of Illustrations 111 Acknowledgements iv Summary vi CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION: AIMS AND SCOPE I 2 KEY DOCUMENTS 27 3 PLANTS FOR TEACHING, AND FOR RESEARCH: 42 teaching of botany; supplies of plant material; research into taxonomy; experimental botany 4 ECONOMIC BOTANY - plants with domestic 57 and medicinal uses and of commercial importance 5 HORTICULTURE: the acquisition and 74 cultivation of plants in botanical gardens 6 AMENITY: plants for pleasure and 97 interest 7 PUBLIC INFORMATION AND EDUCATION ilk SERVICES; PUBLIC RECREATION FACILITIES 1. CHAPTER PAGE NUMBER 8 CONSERVATION: wild and cultivated 139 plants in danger 9 BOTANICAL GARDENS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC; 188 GUIDES TO THE GARDENS - PRINTED PUBLICITY; ILLUSTRATIONS FROM THE GUIDE S 10 FUNCTIONS OF GARDENS - THE PROBLEM 220 OF OVERLAP 11 SHEFFIELD BOTANICAL GARDENS 242 12 BOTANICAL GARDENS IN BRITISH 'TWINNED' 2.7 TOWNS - ANY INTERACTION WITH THEIR EUROPEAN PARTNERS? 13 PUBLIC VIEWS ON BOTANICAL GARDENS - 287 A SAMPLE SURVEY 14 GARDENS NOW AND IN THE FUTURE - 294 POSSIBLE DEVELOPMENTS BIBLIOGRAPHY 328 ILLUSTRATIONS (between pages 219 and 220) National 1. Edinburgh Royal Botanic Garden: Rock Garden Pond. 2. Kew Royal Botanic Gardens: Palm House with spring bedding. 3. Westonbirt Arboretum (Forestry Commission): the memorial sarsen stone on Mitchell Drive. University L&. Cambridge University Botanic Garden: [view of Garden shown on front of folding leaflet]. 5. Ness Gardens (University of Liverpool): a late summer scene in the Heather Garden.
    [Show full text]
  • Grassroots E-Floras in the Poaceae: Growing Grassbase and Grassworld
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal PhytoKeys 48: 73–84Grassroots (2015) e-floras in the Poaceae: growing GrassBase and GrassWorld 73 doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.48.7159 REVIEW ARTICLE www.phytokeys.com Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Grassroots e-floras in the Poaceae: growing GrassBase and GrassWorld Maria S. Vorontsova1, Derek Clayton1, Bryan K. Simon2, † 1 Comparative Plant & Fungal Biology, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, United Kingdom 2 Queensland Herbarium, DSITIA, Brisbane Botanic Gardens, Mt Coot-tha, Toowong, Qld 4066, Australia Corresponding author: Maria S. Vorontsova ([email protected]) Academic editor: S. Knapp | Received 29 January 2014 | Accepted 6 March 2015 | Published 15 April 2015 Citation: Vorontsova MS, Clayton D, Simon BK (2015) Grassroots e-floras in the Poaceae: growing GrassBase and GrassWorld. PhytoKeys 48: 73–84. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.48.7159 Abstract GrassBase and GrassWorld are the largest structured descriptive datasets in plants, publishing descriptions of 11,290 species in the DELTA format. Twenty nine years of data compilation and maintenance have created a dataset which now underpins much of the Poaceae bioinformatics. GrassBase and GrassWorld can continue to grow productively if the proliferation of alternative classifications and datasets can be brought together into a consensus system. If the datasets are reconciled instead of diverging further apart a long term cumulative process can bring knowledge together for great future utility. This paper presents the Poaceae as the first and largest model system for e-taxonomy and the study of classification develop- ment in plants. The origin, development, and content of both datasets is described and key contributors are noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Orchidaceae: Genera and Species (12/1/2004)
    AUSTRALIAN ORCHID NAME INDEX (21/1/2008) by Mark A. Clements Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research/Australian National Herbarium GPO Box 1600 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia Corresponding author: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The Australian Orchid Name Index (AONI) provides the currently accepted scientific names, together with their synonyms, of all Australian orchids including those in external territories. The appropriate scientific name for each orchid taxon is based on data published in the scientific or historical literature, and/or from study of the relevant type specimens or illustrations and study of taxa as herbarium specimens, in the field or in the living state. Structure of the index: Genera and species are listed alphabetically. Accepted names for taxa are in bold, followed by the author(s), place and date of publication, details of the type(s), including where it is held and assessment of its status. The institution(s) where type specimen(s) are housed are recorded using the international codes for Herbaria (Appendix 1) as listed in Holmgren et al’s Index Herbariorum (1981) continuously updated, see [http://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/IndexHerbariorum.asp]. Citation of authors follows Brummit & Powell (1992) Authors of Plant Names; for book abbreviations, the standard is Taxonomic Literature, 2nd edn. (Stafleu & Cowan 1976-88; supplements, 1992-2000); and periodicals are abbreviated according to B-P- H/S (Bridson, 1992) [http://www.ipni.org/index.html]. Synonyms are provided with relevant information on place of publication and details of the type(s). They are indented and listed in chronological order under the accepted taxon name. Synonyms are also cross-referenced under genus.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Perspective on the Origins of Agriculture: the Importance of Unconscious Selection
    A global perspective on the origins of agriculture: the importance of unconscious selection Thomas Kluyver Department of Animal and Plant Sciences A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2013 1 Acknowledgements My primary supervisor, Colin Osborne, has provided advice, encouragement and inspiration throughout my PhD. My supervisors in the Department of Archaeology, Glynis Jones and Mike Charles, have patiently helped me to get to grips with a field which I had never studied before this project. Mark Rees’ advice about statistics has also been invaluable. I am grateful to Irene Johnson, for her eminently practical help with growing all kinds of plants, and to Emily Mockford and Chris Bennett, for painstakingly dissecting beet seed capsules to weigh individual seeds. Katherine Haynes and Rebecca Crabtree weighed seed of modern garden vegetables for chapter 3, and that chapter also could not have been written without people and organisations around the world who shared their data with me, including Benoît Pujol (Laboratoire Évolution et Diversité Biologique, France), the Botanical Information Section at RBG Kew, the USDA National Genetic Resources Program, the International Potato Centre (CIP) in Peru, and EMBRAPA in Brazil. Over the last few years, I have enjoyed a warm, friendly and intellectually stimulating environment in Sheffield. It has been a pleasure to work with the people in Colin Osborne’s lab group, as well as the many others who I have got to know. My PhD research was funded by a university studentship from the University of Sheffield, for which I am very thankful. Last but not least, my thanks to my girlfriend and my family, for their support both during my PhD and in the years of education which prepared me to undertake it.
    [Show full text]
  • WRA Species Report
    Family: Poaceae Taxon: Helictotrichon sempervirens Synonym: Avena notarisii Parl. Common Name: Blue Oat Grass Avena sempervirens Vill. (basionym) Questionaire : current 20090513 Assessor: Chuck Chimera Designation: L Status: Assessor Approved Data Entry Person: Chuck Chimera WRA Score 1 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? y=1, n=-1 103 Does the species have weedy races? y=1, n=-1 201 Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If island is primarily wet habitat, then (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2- Intermediate substitute "wet tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" high) (See Appendix 2) 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2- High high) (See Appendix 2) 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 y 204 Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or subtropical climates y=1, n=0 n 205 Does the species have a history of repeated introductions outside its natural range? y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 y 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see n Appendix 2), n= question 205 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see n Appendix 2) 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see n Appendix 2) 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see n Appendix 2) 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see y Appendix 2) 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 n 402 Allelopathic y=1, n=0 403 Parasitic y=1, n=0 n 404 Unpalatable to grazing animals y=1, n=-1 y 405 Toxic to animals
    [Show full text]
  • Dr.M.S Kiranraj , Asst.Professor,Dept
    CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION 3 METHODOLOGY 4 RESULTS & DISCUSSION 4 – 44 ANALYSIS & SUMMARY 44 –49 REFERENCES 50 Plates (Nos. 1- 4) 51 – 54 Appendix (Published Papers) 2 INTRODUCTION The Crop Genetic Resources (CGRs) otherwise known as Crop Wild Relatives (CWRs) which include the progenitors of crops, as well as species more or less closely related to them, constitute an increasingly important resource for improving agricultural production and for maintaining sustainable agroecosystems. They have contributed many useful genes to crop plants, and modern varieties of most crops now contain genes from their wild relatives. CWRs are the repositories of genetic variation that can be used in breeding new and better adapted crop varieties that are resistant to stress, disease and more importantly the climate change. In the process of domestication, a crop goes through a genetic bottleneck, ending up with much less genetic variation than is available in the wild species. The genetic resource diversity is on decline due to the lack of proper classification and genetic studies worldwide. According to the evaluation of IUCN 2008 Red List Assessment, about 54% of the 1,555 Monocotyledons were classified as endangered or facing a high risk of extinction in the wild ,where as 12% were listed been critically endangered. This is all the more important when we consider that the Monocotyledon family includes economically important crops such as rice , wheat, maize, barley, sorghum, and sugarcane, which along provide more than the half of the dietary energy if the world’s population. The wise conservation and use of crop wild relatives are essential elements for increasing food security, eliminating poverty, and maintaining the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidebook to Invasive Nonnative Plants of the Elwha Watershed Restoration
    Guidebook to Invasive Nonnative Plants of the Elwha Watershed Restoration Olympic National Park, Washington Cynthia Lee Riskin A project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Environmental Horticulture University of Washington 2013 Committee: Linda Chalker-Scott Kern Ewing Sarah Reichard Joshua Chenoweth Program Authorized to Offer Degree: School of Environmental and Forest Sciences Guidebook to Invasive Nonnative Plants of the Elwha Watershed Restoration Olympic National Park, Washington Cynthia Lee Riskin Master of Environmental Horticulture candidate School of Environmental and Forest Sciences University of Washington, Seattle September 3, 2013 Contents Figures ................................................................................................................................................................. ii Tables ................................................................................................................................................................. vi Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... vii Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Bromus tectorum L. (BROTEC) ..................................................................................................................... 19 Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. (CIRARV)
    [Show full text]
  • BOTANIC GARDEN CREATION and MANAGEMENT: the FEASIBILITY and DESIGN of NEW BRITISH COLLECTIONS [On-Line Edition]
    BOTANIC GARDEN CREATION AND MANAGEMENT: THE FEASIBILITY AND DESIGN OF NEW BRITISH COLLECTIONS [On-line Edition] PhD Thesis University of Reading School of Plant Sciences James Furse-Roberts [email protected] June 2005 Abstract Introduction Chapter 1 - Overview of Botanic Gardens Chapter 2 - Survey of British Botanical Collections Chapter 3 - Case Studies of Selected Botanic Collections Chapter 4 - Discussion of Botanic Collections Elements Chapter 5 - Design & Interpretation Chapter 6 - Eden Project Case Study Chapter 7 - Market Research Chapter 8 - Carymoor Case Study Chapter 9 - Alternative Solutions Chapter 10 - Conclusion Bibliography Appendix Botanic Garden Creation & Management Chapter 3 1 2 3 Case Studies of Selected Botanic Collections The previous chapter concluded by outlining the characteristics of the nine types of collection identified by the results of the botanical collections survey and identified three methods by which the collections in these groups obtain the majority of their funding (1 - government or local council, 2 - affiliated organisation, 3 - visitor admissions or sales). This chapter will examine the hypothesis that a collection’s history and its method of funding affect its character and roles. 3.1 Methodology The information included in the case studies of the ten botanical collections covered in this chapter was compiled from a variety of sources. These include the information gathered through the botanical collections survey (chapter 2), written material, including that on the organisations own website, and interviews with present or past members of staff. When possible, interviews took place at the interviewee’s place of work and, on average, lasted for one hour. They were conducted using what Robson (2002) defines as the ‘unstructured interview’ technique.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny, Morphology and the Role of Hybridization As Driving Force Of
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/707588; this version posted July 18, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Phylogeny, morphology and the role of hybridization as driving force of evolution in 2 grass tribes Aveneae and Poeae (Poaceae) 3 4 Natalia Tkach,1 Julia Schneider,1 Elke Döring,1 Alexandra Wölk,1 Anne Hochbach,1 Jana 5 Nissen,1 Grit Winterfeld,1 Solveig Meyer,1 Jennifer Gabriel,1,2 Matthias H. Hoffmann3 & 6 Martin Röser1 7 8 1 Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Biology, Geobotany and Botanical 9 Garden, Dept. of Systematic Botany, Neuwerk 21, 06108 Halle, Germany 10 2 Present address: German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Deutscher 11 Platz 5e, 04103 Leipzig, Germany 12 3 Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Biology, Geobotany and Botanical 13 Garden, Am Kirchtor 3, 06108 Halle, Germany 14 15 Addresses for correspondence: Martin Röser, [email protected]; Natalia 16 Tkach, [email protected] 17 18 ABSTRACT 19 To investigate the evolutionary diversification and morphological evolution of grass 20 supertribe Poodae (subfam. Pooideae, Poaceae) we conducted a comprehensive molecular 21 phylogenetic analysis including representatives from most of their accepted genera. We 22 focused on generating a DNA sequence dataset of plastid matK gene–3'trnK exon and trnL– 23 trnF regions and nuclear ribosomal ITS1–5.8S gene–ITS2 and ETS that was taxonomically 24 overlapping as completely as possible (altogether 257 species).
    [Show full text]