DOCSLIB.ORG

James Price Point Science Assessment Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
James Price Point Science Assessment Report James Price Point Science Assessment Report Updated Supplementary submission on the WA government’s Browse LNG Strategic Assessment for a proposed gas processing hub at James Price Point, Kimberley WA The Wilderness Society & Environs Kimberley & Conservation Council of WA May 2012 Submission to the WA EPA and Commonwealth Department of Environment (SEWPaC) Printed on Evolve 100% post-consumer recycled paper Supplementary submission – Browse LNG Strategic Assessment Introduction This supplementary submission, presented almost one year after our original joint-ENGO submission on the Browse LNG (BLNG) gas hub ‘strategic assessment report’, highlights significant new and ongoing concerns over the adequacy and reliability of the process. The proponent, the WA Department of State Development (DSD), has manifestly failed to provide the Environment Protection Authority (EPA), the Department of Environment, Water, Populations and Communities (DSEWPaC), and respective State and Commonwealth Ministers, with a sound basis for decisions on development options for the Browse gas field. What started out as a strategic assessment process intended to optimise environmental, social and economic outcomes from development of the Browse gas field has turned into a process to defend a political decision to locate a massive, but inadequately defined, LNG hub at James Price Point (JPP) on the pristine Kimberley coast. The Strategic Assessment Report (SAR) produced by the proponent is incomplete, inaccurate and fails to adequately address key environmental, social and economic issues, including cumulative impacts. Instead, it presents grossly inadequate studies and unsubstantiated conclusions as the basis for project approval. Having pre-empted the assessment of other options – options preferred by several of the Browse LNG joint venture partners (JVPs), the proponent does not adequately describe the proposal at James Price Point. Despite the requirements of the SAR Agreement and Terms of Reference 1, DSD’s documentation fails to set out in sufficient detail its plans in relation to, amongst other things, groundwater use and desalination; breakwater design and construction; dredging (incl. cumulative impacts), and greenhouse gas mitigation. Studies and information relied on by the proponent but clearly inadequate (lack of time and data, poor design, etc) include those relating to cetaceans (whales and dolphins), sawfish, turtles, dugongs, birds, monsoon vine thickets, bilbies, dredging, coastal processes modelling, marine wastewater discharge, hydrogeology and hydrology, and social and economic impacts. The dinosaur trackways work done by DSD was shown to be grossly inadequate, requiring the EPA to demand a further assessment, which has not yet been released. Community science initiatives have exposed major flaws in the multi-million dollar consultants studies relied on by DSD, including in the areas of dinosaur trackways, turtles, monsoon vine thickets, cetaceans and bilbies. Fundamentally, DSD and the SAR have failed to adequately acknowledge or factor in the global significance of the Kimberley marine and coastal environment as one of the most pristine (least impacted) left on Earth outside the polar regions (see Fig. 1). Several of the Browse JVPs have made it clear that they do not want to be constrained to the costly and risky ‘greenfields’ Kimberley option. Industry analysts state that it would be $10 billion cheaper to pipe the gas south ( Appendix 5 ). Narrow and misplaced motivations must not be allowed to prioritise James Price Point over other less environmentally destructive, less socially divisive and less economically risky options. Fig 1: Global map of cumulative human impact across 20 ocean ecosystem types showing northern Australia as ‘Very low impact’. 2 1 Australian and Western Australian Governments (2008). Strategic Assessment Agreement - Relating to the assessment of the impacts of actions under the Plan for the Browse Basin Common User Liquefied Natural Gas Hub Precinct. Canberra. 2 Halpern, BS, et al (2008). A Global Map of Human Impact on Marine Ecosystems . Science 319:948. DOI: 0.1126/science.1149345. Supplementary Report: Browse LNG Strategic Assessment April 2012 Page-1 1. Failure to implement agreed scientific peer review process A number of leading scientists have commented (in their submission or in personal communications) on the poor science and lack of peer review in the SAR. Despite the proponent, the WA Department of State Development, agreeing that a comprehensive scientific peer review process was required, it has failed to create such a review body or process. The Strategic Assessment Peer Review Process was recommended in the Browse LNG Precinct Scope of the Strategic Assessment: “Given the significant environment and the scale and complexity of the proposal, there is required a high level of confidence of the technical work underpinning the Strategic Assessment. As such there is an intention to undertake ongoing reviews of the strategic assessment process and of all deliverables and outputs. Arrangements for Peer review, including the establishment of a Peer Review Panel consisting of members from government and non-government sectors are to be advised.” 3 Regardless of the timing, a credible peer review process must now be established to review all the studies and information provided by DSD and Woodside. Recent independent reports on dinosaur trackways, dredging, bilbies, dolphins, turtles and social impacts have thrown serious doubt on the adequacy of the studies provided by DSD and Woodside. Unless and until the agreed peer review panel is established, Ministers and the public can have no confidence in the accuracy or adequacy of the material presented by the proponent. 2. Legal doubt over project location & description The recent WA Supreme Court decision to declare null and void the government’s compulsory land acquisition notices has served to further highlight the legally questionable nature of this industrial precinct and its impact assessment. 4 Given that the proponent has not clearly and lawfully defined the project area, it is doubtful how the EPA can carry out an assessment. Even small changes in the location of any of the dozens of components that make up this precinct could result in serious, material changes to the project’s impacts, e.g. in relation to dinosaur trackways, Aboriginal sites or threatened monsoon vine thicket communities. The compulsory land acquisition process has now recommenced with revised BLNG project boundaries. The SAR will need to reassess the likely impacts in view of these revised boundaries. 3. Conflicts of interest: Environmental consultants One of the key environmental consultants for the SAR and the proposed access highway to James Price Point (JPP), AECOM Pty Ltd, has been identified by Main Roads WA as ‘preferred project partner’ for the construction of the $100m highway to JPP. 5 The EPA and Commonwealth relied on environmental studies by AECOM, such as AECOM’s ‘targeted survey’ for bilbies, 6 for their respective decisions not to formally assess the road proposal. As a result, AECOM now stands to earn millions of dollars of public money from building a road that studies it authored helped ensure would not be subject to rigorous environmental impact assessment. AECOM also provided one of the two reports on the significance of dinosaur trackways at James Price Point that DSD has used to try to discredit the importance of the trackways. 7 Several of the other industry-preferred consultants used by DSD and Woodside give rise to similar concerns as to rigour and impartiality. Without an independent scientific peer review process the public can have no confidence in the reliability of consultant’s studies relied on by DSD in the SAR documentation. 4. Failure to properly consider regional and international marine migratory route and habitat The Dampier Peninsula coast is a key migratory pathway and habitat for whales 8, dolphins 9, turtles 10 , dugongs 11 and sawfish 12 . The importance of this coast as a migratory habitat for multiple and diverse marine species, and the 3 Department of State Development (DSD) (2010) Browse Liquefied Natural Gas Precinct – Strategic Assessment Report (Draft for Public Comment) – Appendix A-2 Scope of the Strategic Assessment . Government of Western Australia, Perth. 4 http://decisions.justice.wa.gov.au/supreme/supdcsn.nsf/PDFJudgments-WebVw/2011WASC0335/$FILE/2011WASC0335.pdf 5 http://www.mainroads.wa.gov.au/BuildingRoads/Projects/RuralProjects/Pages/browse_LNG.aspx#environmental 6 AECOM Australia Pty Ltd (2011) Browse LNG precinct access road – targeted fauna survey: Greater Bilby . Main Roads WA 7 AECOM Australia Pty Ltd (2010) Preliminary report on the Palaeontology including dinosaur footprints of the Broome sandstone in the James Price Point area, WA. Department of State Development. Supplementary Report: Browse LNG Strategic Assessment April 2012 Page-2 cumulative threats posed by industrialisation, are not adequately addressed by the proponent in the SAR or subsequently. 4.1 Dolphins disregarded by SAR The presence of dolphins has been almost completely overlooked in the SAR. The SAR has incorrectly dismissed all of the Kimberley coast’s species of dolphin as one species and has failed to conduct targeted studies to determine the presence of, and likely impact to, each of the various dolphin species. Independent scientists have been highly critical of the SAR in its failure to recognise different species of dolphins.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Browse to NWS Development EPBC Act and EP Act Environmental
    Proposed Browse to NWS Development, EPBC Act and EP Act Environmental Referrals Supporting Document November 2018 Rev 0A BD0000RG0000037 Page 1 of 141 November 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 6 1.1 Overview of Proposed Action .......................................................................................... 6 1.2 Project History ................................................................................................................. 6 1.2.1 Initial Concept Select ................................................................................................... 6 1.2.2 James Price Point Concept ......................................................................................... 7 1.2.3 FLNG Concept ............................................................................................................ 7 1.2.4 Browse to North West Shelf Concept .......................................................................... 7 1.3 Comparison with Browse FLNG Concept ....................................................................... 7 1.4 Purpose and Scope of this Document ............................................................................ 8 1.4.1 Purpose ....................................................................................................................... 8 1.4.2 Scope .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Inquiry Into Corporate Tax Avoidance and Minimisation
    Shell Australia Pty Ltd Committee Chair ABN 14 009 663 576 Senate Economics References Committee 2 Victoria Avenue PO Box 6100 Perth WA 6000 Parliament House Australia CANBERRA ACT 2600 Tel +61 8 9338 6000 Internet www.shell.com.au Correspondence 29 July 2015 PO BOX A47 CDC Perth WA 6837 Senate Inquiry into corporate tax avoidance and minimisation Shell Australia1 welcomes the opportunity to make this submission in response to your letter of 14th July 2015. 1. Background – About Shell Shell2 is a global group of energy and petrochemical companies, with its headquarters in The Hague, the Netherlands. Shell operates in over 70 countries around the world and employs around 94,000 people. In April 2015, the Boards of Royal Dutch Shell plc and BG Group plc agreed the terms of a proposed merger. The parties are targeting completion of the transaction in early 2016 and are currently seeking regulatory approvals in a number of jurisdictions. Subject to obtaining these approvals, the companies’ shareholders will then be asked to support the proposal. Shell in Australia Shell has been in Australia since 1901 and the Australian business forms an important part of Shell’s global natural gas business. Historically, our significant investments in Australia spanned across both the downstream and upstream sectors. In 2014 Shell sold its downstream refining, marketing and retail distribution operations to Vitol, and our business is now largely focused within the upstream sector – although Shell continues to supply aviation fuels and lubricants. 1 “Shell Australia” refers to Shell Australia Pty Ltd or any of the members of the Australian tax consolidated group of which Shell Energy Holdings Australia Ltd (SEHAL) is the head company.
    [Show full text]
  • Class Keeps Pace with FLNG Development
    AS SEEN IN APRIL 2014 Shell’s Prelude development opens FLNG floodgate Scott Weeden , Senior Editor, Drilling COPYRIGHT © HART ENERGY | 1616 S. VOSS, STE. 1000, HOUSTON, TX 77057 USA | +1 713 260 6400 | FAX +1 713 840 8585 COVER STORY: FLNG With an eye on moving liquefaction plants offshore to reduce costs, operators in Australia, Colombia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Equatorial Guinea, Israel, and the US Gulf Coast are studying FLNG projects. hen the final investment decision (FID) was signed for the WPrelude floating LNG (FLNG) facility offshore Australia, FLNG technology quickly became the leading option for developing offshore gas fields or stranded gas fields onshore. The Caribbean LNG project being developed by Exmar and Pacific Rubiales Energy is a barge-mounted FLNG plant that will be docked in Colombia to liquefy gas from onshore fields. Then Petronas began construction on its PFLNG 1 project in June 2013 and made its FID on the PFLNG 2 project in February 2014. Both units are for offshore fields. FLNG provides advantages for stranded gas reserves. For example, the Bonaparte LNG project offshore Australia will include the Petrel and Tern fields that were discovered more than 40 years ago and were considered too remote and relatively small to develop. Once those reserves are depleted, the FLNG vessel can be moved to another field to continue operations. The Prelude development opened the floodgates for FLNG projects offshore Australia. Although Shell’s facility is under construction and the Scarborough LNG and Bonaparte LNG projects have been approved, Western Australia’s government wants to put the brakes on further FLNG projects, citing fewer jobs and less opportunity for domestic engineering and fabrication companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016 Delivering Value Growth
    ANNUAL REPORT 2016 DELIVERING VALUE GROWTH Woodside Petroleum Ltd | i On the cover Sustainable Development The Pluto LNG Plant underpinned Woodside’s Report 2016 record LNG production in 2016, contributing This report is a summary of Woodside's 40.2 MMboe. For Woodside, Pluto LNG sustainability approach, actions and represents safe, highly reliable operations performance for the 12-month period ended backed by new technology and innovation. 31 December 2016. This report will be available This image was taken by a drone and looks on 16 March 2017. across Pluto towards the North West Shelf Project. Drones are increasingly being used at our onshore and offshore facilities to conduct high-risk inspections more safely and efficiently. About this report Report objectives This Annual Report 2016 is a summary of All dollar figures are expressed in US currency, This report meets our compliance and Woodside’s operations and activities for the Woodside share, unless otherwise stated. governance requirements, and is designed 12-month period ended 31 December 2016 to provide easy-to-read information on Woodside is continuing efforts to reduce its and financial position as at 31 December 2016. how Woodside performed in 2016 for environmental footprint associated with the Woodside Petroleum Ltd (ABN 55 004 898 our stakeholders, including shareholders, production of the Annual Report. Printed 962) is the parent company of the Woodside customers, the community and employees. copies of the Annual Report will only be group of companies. In this report, unless posted to shareholders who have elected to We aim to build awareness of our operations otherwise stated, references to 'Woodside' receive a printed copy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Impact of Floating LNG on Western Australia Volume 1
    Economics and Industry Standing Committee The economic impact of floating LNG on Western Australia Volume 1 Report No. 2 Legislative Assembly May 2014 Parliament of Western Australia Committee Members Chairman Mr I.C. Blayney, MLA Member for Geraldton Deputy Chairman Hon F.M. Logan, MLA Member for Cockburn Members Mr P.C. Tinley, AM, MLA Member for Willagee Mr J. Norberger, MLA Member for Joondalup Mr R.S. Love, MLA Member for Moore (from 15 August 2013) Mr V.A. Catania, MLA Member for North West Central (from 9 May 2013 to 15 August 2013) Committee Staff Principal Research Officer Dr Loraine Abernethie, PhD (from 2 September 2013) Acting Principal Research Mr Michael Burton, BEc, BA (Hons) Officer (from 22 May 2013 to 30 August 2013) Research Officer Mr Michael Burton Legislative Assembly Tel: (08) 9222 7494 Parliament House Fax: (08) 9222 7804 Harvest Terrace Email: [email protected] PERTH WA 6000 Website: www.parliament.wa.gov.au/eisc Published by the Parliament of Western Australia, Perth. May 2014. ISBN: 978-1-925116-07-6 (Series: Western Australia. Parliament. Legislative Assembly. Committees. Economics and Industry Standing Committee. Report 2; Volume 1) 328.365 Economics and Industry Standing Committee The economic impact of floating LNG on Western Australia Volume 1 Report No. 2 Presented by Mr I.C. Blayney, MLA Laid on the Table of the Legislative Assembly on 15 May 2014 Chairman’s Foreword am pleased to present the first of the Economic and Industry Standing Committee’s (the Committee’s) reports from its Inquiry into the economic impact of floating Iliquefied natural gas (FLNG) on Western Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Australian LNG Exports
    September 2014 The Future of Australian LNG Exports: Will domestic challenges limit the development of future LNG export capacity? David Ledesma, James Henderson* & Nyrie Palmer** OIES PAPER: NG 90 *Senior Research Fellows, OIES, **Senior Regulatory Officer, NSW Resources and Energy The contents of this paper are the authors’ sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members. Copyright © 2014 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN 978-1-78467-008-5 September 2014: The Future of Australian LNG Exports ii Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank everyone who helped us in drafting the paper, in Australia as well as the UK. Your contributions have helped to enrich the document and ensure accuracy of the content and conclusions September 2014: The Future of Australian LNG Exports iii Preface With seven the new LNG projects under construction and due for completion in the 2014 – 2018 timeframe amounting in addition to existing facilities, Australia is expected to overtake Qatar as the world’s largest supplier of LNG by the end of the 2010s. With its plentiful gas reserves, prior track record of LNG project execution and operation and relative proximity to the fast growing Asian LNG markets the degree of comparative advantage would seem to guarantee a benign investment environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Petrochina Shows Faith in LNG
    PetroChina shows faith in LNG http://www.afr.com/p/business/companies/petrochina_shows_faith_in_... PetroChina shows faith in LNG PUBLISHED: 13 Dec 2012 PRINT EDITION: 13 Dec 2012 PetroChina is fast becoming one of the biggest foreign backers of the Australian LNG sector. Photo: James Davies Angela Macdonald-Smith PetroChina’s second major equity investment in Australia is being regarded not only as an endorsement of the Woodside-led Browse project, but also a vote of confidence in the future of the Australian LNG sector. The state-owned oil giant’s $US1.63 billion entry into Browse LNG adds to its 50 per cent stake in the Arrow Energy coal seam gas-based venture with Royal Dutch Shell, which arose after the partners combined for a $3.5 billion cash takeover of the Queensland CSG explorer. Together with its huge position as a customer for Australian LNG, PetroChina is fast becoming one of the biggest foreign backers of the Australian LNG sector despite forecasts of plentiful shale gas arriving in Asia and China’s aim to develop its own unconventional gas resources. It is the biggest customer for the Chevron-led $US52 billion Gorgon venture and the investment is being hailed as an indication of Australia’s important role in feeding the growing energy needs of Asia. The Chinese oil major has forecast it will spend $US60 billion on global oil and gas investments as it seeks to increase overseas production to half its total output by 2020. It has singled out Australia as a target for investments, alongside central Asia, eastern Africa and Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodside Petroleum's Gas Refinery
    Woodside Petroleum’s gas refinery Australia Sectors: Oil and Gas Extraction On record This profile is no longer actively maintained, with the information now possibly out of date Send feedback on this profile By: BankTrack Created before Nov 2016 Last update: Nov 1 2015 Contact: Heidi Nore, Campaigner The Wilderness Society Project website Sectors Oil and Gas Extraction Location This project has been identified as an Equator Project About Woodside Petroleum’s gas refinery The Browse Basin gas field off Western Australia's (WA's) north coast is estimated to contain 35 trillion cubic feet of gas. Woodside Petroleum Ltd and its joint venture partners - Shell, Chevron, BP and BHP Billiton - want to process the gas to LNG for export to Asia. The proposed gas processing site for the Browse LNG Joint Venture is James Price Point, 50km north of Broome on the Kimberley coast, Western Australia. The project is estimated to cost $30-40 billion. The Kimberley is recognised as one of the world's great unspoiled marine and terrestrial environments - a unique and highly valued region with outstanding biological diversity, cultural richness and scenic grandeur. The proposed gas refinery site is in the middle of the world's largest Humpback whale nursery. The gas refinery and industrial port is opposed by environment groups, Traditional Owners, tourism operators and local communities due to its massive social and environmental impacts. Latest developments Latest update Apr 13 2013 Latest update Dec 6 2010 What must happen Any banks approached to assist with financing the Browse LNG Joint Venture should refuse to support this highly risky, socially divisive and environmentally disastrous project.
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT INCORPORATING APPENDIX 4E About this report This Annual Report 2017 is a summary of Woodside’s operations and activities for the 12-month period ended 31 December 2017 and financial position as at 31 December 2017. Woodside Petroleum Ltd (ABN 55 004 898 962) is the ultimate holding company of the Woodside group of companies. In this report, unless otherwise stated, references to ‘Woodside’ and the ‘Group’, the ‘company’, ‘we’, ‘us’ and ‘our’ refer to Woodside Petroleum Ltd and its controlled entities, as a whole. The text does not distinguish between the activities of the ultimate holding company and those of its controlled entities. In this report, references to a year are to the calendar and financial year ended 31 December 2017 unless otherwise stated. All dollar figures are expressed in US currency, Woodside share, unless otherwise stated. Additional information We have indicated where additional information is available online and in other sections of this report like this: Refer to the Glossary section on pages 143–144 for key terms, units of measurement and conversion factors. Refer to Woodside’s website for more information (www.woodside.com.au). Forward-looking statements This report contains forward-looking statements. Please refer to page 142, which contains a notice in respect of these statements. We are working with Green ReportsTM on an initiative ensuring that communications minimise environmental impact and create a more sustainable future for the community. Sustainable Development Report 2017 A summary of Woodside’s sustainability approach, actions and performance for the 12-month period ended 31 December 2017 is included in our Sustainable Development Report 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Walmadany (James Price Point) and the Question of the Browse Basin Gas Resources of North West Australia
    ‘Law Below the Top Soil’ Walmadany (James Price Point) and the Question of the Browse Basin Gas Resources of North West Australia 1 The publishers wishes to advise members of the Kimberley Indigenous communities including the Yawuru, Goolarabooloo and Jabirr Jabirr people that this report contains the images and names of people who have passed away. 2 Paddy Roe, OAM; Nyikina, Goolarabooloo Elder; Winner of the Western Australian Literary Award, 1985; Shortlist, National Book Council Award 1985; Shortlist NSW Premiers Literary Award 1983; Shortlist National Book Council Award 1983. 3 “There is, especially in public life, no more beautiful a characteristic than truth. Truth is of its essence liberating; it is possessed of no contrivance or conceit — it provides the only genuine basis for progress. By overturning the lie of terra nullius, the notion that at sovereignty the continent was possessed by no one, the High Court not only opened a route to indigenous land, it rang a bell which reminded us that our future could only be found in truth.” Paul J. Keating, Lowitja O’Donoghue Oration, May 31, 2011. “Song cycles reflect the travels and creative activities of ancestral beings. Through song cycles, the creation stories, ceremonies, laws and rituals are passed between communities. The area covered by the Lurujarri Heritage Trail incorporates a vital segment of a wider mythology. Any adverse effect on the integrity of the area will have far reaching effects on Aboriginal people throughout the West Kimberley.” Elizabeth Bradshaw & Rachel Fry, A Management Report for the Lurujarri Heritage Trail, Broome, Western Australia, Western Australian Museum, May 1989, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Shell Australia
    SHELL AUSTRALIA Submission to the review of the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax FEBRUARY 2017 Page 2 of 19 Table of Contents Glossary ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive summary .......................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 7 2. Shell in Australia .......................................................................................................................... 7 3. Shell Australia’s tax profile ........................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Shell Australia’s PRRT position .............................................................................................. 9 4. The Australian LNG industry ...................................................................................................... 10 4.1 Australia has significant undeveloped gas resources............................................................ 11 4.2 The importance of further exploration ................................................................................ 14 5. Continued investment in Australian projects ............................................................................... 15 5.1 Cost and location challenges associated with Australian projects
    [Show full text]
  • The True Traditional Owners of James Price Point and the Politics of the Anti-Gas Protest
    2019 The Bindunbur ‘Bombshell’ 597 THE BINDUNBUR ‘BOMBSHELL’: THE TRUE TRADITIONAL OWNERS OF JAMES PRICE POINT AND THE POLITICS OF THE ANTI-GAS PROTEST LILY O’NEILL* On 23 November 2017, the Federal Court handed down its judgment in the Bindunbur case, a long-running native title dispute over significant areas of the Middle Dampier Peninsula in the Kimberley, North-West Australia. The decision was called a ‘bombshell’ because of Justice North’s finding that the Goolarabooloo family, long described in the media and by the public as ‘traditional owners’ of James Price Point and seen as leaders of the fight against the failed Kimberley gas hub, are not traditional owners of that area after all. This article argues there are several related reasons why outsiders mistook who are the true traditional owners of James Price Point. Firstly, an entrenched association in the minds of most non-Aboriginal people between Aboriginality and wilderness; secondly, outsider ignorance of Aboriginal law; thirdly, several key differences between the customary Aboriginal normative system and Australian settler property law; and finally, that it was essential to have traditional owner support for the No Gas campaign against the project. I INTRODUCTION On 23 November 2017, the Federal Court of Australia handed down its judgment in Manado (Bindunbur Native Title Claim Group) v State of Western Australia (‘Bindunbur’), a long-running native title dispute over significant areas of the Middle Dampier Peninsula in the Kimberley, North-West Australia.1 The * Dr Lily O’Neill is a Principal at Cumulus Consulting and a Research Fellow at the Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research at the Australian National University, working on the ‘Zero-Carbon Energy for the Asia-Pacific’ Grand Challenge Project.
    [Show full text]