DOCSLIB.ORG

Woodside Petroleum's Gas Refinery

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Woodside Petroleum’s gas refinery Australia Sectors: Oil and Gas Extraction On record This profile is no longer actively maintained, with the information now possibly out of date Send feedback on this profile By: BankTrack Created before Nov 2016 Last update: Nov 1 2015 Contact: Heidi Nore, Campaigner The Wilderness Society Project website Sectors Oil and Gas Extraction Location This project has been identified as an Equator Project About Woodside Petroleum’s gas refinery The Browse Basin gas field off Western Australia's (WA's) north coast is estimated to contain 35 trillion cubic feet of gas. Woodside Petroleum Ltd and its joint venture partners - Shell, Chevron, BP and BHP Billiton - want to process the gas to LNG for export to Asia. The proposed gas processing site for the Browse LNG Joint Venture is James Price Point, 50km north of Broome on the Kimberley coast, Western Australia. The project is estimated to cost $30-40 billion. The Kimberley is recognised as one of the world's great unspoiled marine and terrestrial environments - a unique and highly valued region with outstanding biological diversity, cultural richness and scenic grandeur. The proposed gas refinery site is in the middle of the world's largest Humpback whale nursery. The gas refinery and industrial port is opposed by environment groups, Traditional Owners, tourism operators and local communities due to its massive social and environmental impacts. Latest developments Latest update Apr 13 2013 Latest update Dec 6 2010 What must happen Any banks approached to assist with financing the Browse LNG Joint Venture should refuse to support this highly risky, socially divisive and environmentally disastrous project. NGOs should alert their networks about this upcoming project and encourage their members to write to banks which are potential financiers, voicing their opposition. Western Australia should put its resources behind industries which value the unique natural and cultural features of the Kimberley and have greater potential to generate local jobs and prosperity, such as tourism, instead of promoting environmentally destructive and unsustainable oil and gas developments in a globally significant region. Impacts Social and human rights impacts The proposed LNG project near Broome will cause major long term social and economic impacts on Broome and throughout the Dampier Peninsula. These impacts range from increased recreational fishing pressure to the transformation of Broome into a fly-in, fly-out industry town. As has been witnessed in other mining towns, housing and other living costs are likely to increase dramatically. Millions of tonnes of noxious gases such as benzene, hexene and tollulene will be discharged over the life of these projects. Acid rain produced from the flaring of gases during exploration drilling, production and processing is also a major source of industrial pollution and greenhouse emissions. Emissions occur through venting of carbon dioxide (CO2) removed from the reservoir; from transport of gas from the reservoir to the plant; from LNG processing and from combustion sources used to supply energy for LNG processing. Many other noxious atmospheric and marine pollutants will be routinely generated from operations including drilling, blasting, dredging, flaring, ballast water etc. Some of the atmospheric pollutants - which could blow over Broome and other communities - include: nitrogen dioxides, sulphur dioxide, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) like benzene, toluene (methylbenzene), xylene and hydrogen sulfide, as well as carcinogens like benzapyrene and dioxin. Under Article 32 of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, "States shall consult and cooperate in good faith with the indigenous peoples concerned through their own representative institutions in order to obtain their free and informed consent prior to the approval of any project affecting their lands or territories and other resources, particularly in connection with the development, utilisation or exploitation of mineral, water or other resources." Despite Australian being a signatory to this international convention, in September 2010 Premier Barnett formally commenced compulsory acquisition proceedings covering just over 10,000 hectares of land and seas under Aboriginal Native Title claim. The decision to compulsorily acquire land ignores the requirement for free, prior and informed consent of Traditional Owners and increases fear and mistrust of Government and the proposed development. Environmental and climate impacts The Kimberley coastal and marine environment is globally significant as one of the most pristine left in the world, second only to the polar regions. The region is a refuge for thousands of native animal and plant species, many of them now endangered. The clean, sheltered waters are home to the world's largest Humpback population and it is here that they calve and mate. The impacts and risks of industrialisation are enormous. According to the Australian government's Humpback Whale Recovery Plan (2005 - 2010), critical habitat for the whales in Australia includes, "The southern Kimberley between Broome and the northern end of Camden Sound". This ‘critical habitat zone' includes James Price Point. According to the Humpback whale recovery plan, the most serious threats to whales in Australian waters are: acoustic pollution - e.g. shipping; seismic surveys; physical injury and death from ship strike; built structures - e.g. ports, marinas and wharves; changing water quality and pollution - e.g. oil or chemical spills; dredging - e.g. sedimentation, turbidity. Each and all of these threats to the Kimberley's Humpback whales would apply if James Price Point were developed for LNG. -readmore- Similar concerns apply to a wide range of other endangered and/or protected marine and terrestrial species and their habitats found in the James Price Point region, including; Dugong, Pygmy blue whale, Freshwater sawfish, four sea turtle species (Flatback, Green, Loggerhead and Hawksbill), Snubfin dolphin, seagrass beds, coral reefs and filter feeder communities and fish aggregation areas. Local remnant rainforest patches (or ‘Monsoon Vine Thickets') - a WA-listed Threatened Ecological Community, have barely been studied. Several hundred hectares of this very important ecosystem would be destroyed by the gas hub development. In addition, the only two studies looking at threatened terrestrial fauna species at James Price Point have been unable to determine whether or not as many 46 threatened and protected species are present in the area. This includes ‘iconic' species such as the Bilby. The national and international importance of the dinosaur footprints found on the Dampier Peninsula, including in the vicinity of James Price Point, is only just coming to light, owing to the work of Dr Tony Thulborn: "The Dampier Peninsula coast has provided practically the entire fossil record of dinosaurs in the western half of the Australian continent...There are at least 15 types of dinosaur tracks representing every major group of the Dinosauria...they face the greatest risk of damage or degradation if industrial development is allowed to proceed at James Price Point." Other impacts The Browse LNG Strategic Assessment Agreement was signed in February 2008 by the State and Federal governments. Under the Strategic Assessment Agreement a process was to be undertaken to produce a Strategic Assessment Report ("SAR"). The Strategic Assessment Agreement had three central ‘pillars': i Thorough environmental and social impact studies and assessment; ii Credible examination of Browse LNG processing options outside the Kimberley; iii Indigenous consent. Each of these three pillars has now been subverted by the WA Premier Colin Barnett and Federal Resources Minister Martin Ferguson: Immediately upon election, Premier Barnett decreed that the gas hub would be built in the Kimberley, pre-empting the outcomes of the strategic assessment process. Due to the politically motivated haste in seeking approval for a Kimberley site, the required scientific studies in this remote, biodiverse and little-studied area simply cannot be conducted in the time available to a level that would allow either government to make a ‘safe' decision to approve the development. The examination of feasible sites outside the Kimberley has not occurred. Locations such as Karratha and Port Hedland have been dismissed on grounds that apply just as strongly or more so in the Kimberley, e.g. air pollution, coastal location issues and port development concerns. Meanwhile, the environmental, social and economic benefits of those ‘brownfields' locations have been downplayed despite several of the joint venture companies themselves clearly wanting such options to remain open. Federal Resources Minister Martin Ferguson placed legal conditions on the renewal of the gas leases held by the LNGjoint venture partners which force them to prioritise investment in the Kimberley (James Price Point) location, before this location has been assessed or approved. The WA Premier recently announced compulsory acquisition of the James Price Point land which is currently under Aboriginal native title claim. Governance Other applicable regulations ANZ and Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ are signatories to the Equator Principles. If approached to finance the Browse joint venture project, banks should assess the project under Category A of the Principles and make the full assessment publicly available. Updates Latest update Apr 13 2013
Recommended publications
  • Schroder Australian Equity Fund Performance Overview

    Schroder Australian Equity Fund Performance Overview

    2021 August Schroder Australian Equity Fund Performance overview The S&P / ASX 200 Accumulation Index rose by 2.5%, while the Schroder Wholesale Australian Equity Fund rose by 2.4% (post-fee), underperforming by 0.1% (post-fee) over August 2021. During the month, the Fund added value through stock selection; however, sector allocation proved costly for relative returns. The overweight positions in the Materials and underweight to Financials added value. Conversely, the underweight positions in the Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary detracted from relative returns. At a stock level, overweight positions in Alumina, James Hardie, and Vicinity Centres added value. The Nil holdings in Fortescue Metals and Woodside Petroleum, along with the underweight position in BHP Group were also among the best performing stocks. Detracting from performance were the nil holdings in Afterpay, Wisetech Global, Domino’s Pizza and Aristocrat Leisure. The underweight position in CSL and the overweight Rio Tinto were also among the top detractors. Market Summary Only a cursory amount of common sense seems necessary in questioning the connection between a domestic economy which is largely locked down, a global economy still struggling mightily with a pandemic, and booming equity and real estate markets nearly everywhere. Rampant bull market conditions such as those prevailing currently often seem to render discussions on company profits and valuation superfluous. Perceptions of value become determined by the share price or the house price and are rationalised by comparisons to similar egregiously priced companies or houses. There are a thousand great charts around at present put together by sensible people demonstrating the extreme nature of current market conditions.
  • Westpac Online Investment Loan Acceptable Securities List - Effective 3 September2021

    Westpac Online Investment Loan Acceptable Securities List - Effective 3 September2021

    Westpac Online Investment Loan Acceptable Securities List - Effective 3 September2021 ASX listed securities ASX Code Security Name LVR ASX Code Security Name LVR A2M The a2 Milk Company Limited 50% CIN Carlton Investments Limited 60% ABC Adelaide Brighton Limited 60% CIP Centuria Industrial REIT 50% ABP Abacus Property Group 60% CKF Collins Foods Limited 50% ADI APN Industria REIT 40% CL1 Class Limited 45% AEF Australian Ethical Investment Limited 40% CLW Charter Hall Long Wale Reit 60% AFG Australian Finance Group Limited 40% CMW Cromwell Group 60% AFI Australian Foundation Investment Co. Ltd 75% CNI Centuria Capital Group 50% AGG AngloGold Ashanti Limited 50% CNU Chorus Limited 60% AGL AGL Energy Limited 75% COF Centuria Office REIT 50% AIA Auckland International Airport Limited 60% COH Cochlear Limited 65% ALD Ampol Limited 70% COL Coles Group Limited 75% ALI Argo Global Listed Infrastructure Limited 60% CPU Computershare Limited 70% ALL Aristocrat Leisure Limited 60% CQE Charter Hall Education Trust 50% ALQ Als Limited 65% CQR Charter Hall Retail Reit 60% ALU Altium Limited 50% CSL CSL Limited 75% ALX Atlas Arteria 60% CSR CSR Limited 60% AMC Amcor Limited 75% CTD Corporate Travel Management Limited ** 40% AMH Amcil Limited 50% CUV Clinuvel Pharmaceuticals Limited 40% AMI Aurelia Metals Limited 35% CWN Crown Limited 60% AMP AMP Limited 60% CWNHB Crown Resorts Ltd Subordinated Notes II 60% AMPPA AMP Limited Cap Note Deferred Settlement 60% CWP Cedar Woods Properties Limited 45% AMPPB AMP Limited Capital Notes 2 60% CWY Cleanaway Waste
  • Steelintouch

    Steelintouch

    Steel InTouch WA #7:Layout 1 14/3/07 10:31 AM Page 2 steelintouch News for Western Australian Customers ISSUE NUMBER 7 AUTUMN 2007 articles, log onto www.xlerplate.com.au and search our WELCOME archived editions. In this issue we feature our new XLERPLATE® steel Welcome to the first issue of XLERPLATE® Steel In campaign – called Backing the Aussie Spirit – which is Touch for 2007. themed around the Australian quest to be the best. The year ahead is already shaping up as an eventful See page 2 for details about this exciting new ® and exciting one, with many opportunities and XLERPLATE steel initiative. ® challenges facing our XLERPLATE® steel customers. The BlueScope XLERPLATE team and Steel In Touch We look forward to continuing our value-creating look forward to bringing you the latest news on relationship for 2007 and beyond. developments within our industry throughout 2007. XLERPLATE® Steel In Touch will bring you the latest steel industry news, information about projects happening in your state, updates on the economic environment and XLERPLATE® steel product news. Elly Pilkadaris If you’re interested in reading previous Steel In Touch State Sales Manager - Western Australia A 3D MODEL OF SUCCESS West Australian company PDC Consultants is Billiton and MPDJV (EPCM Contractor), and PDC The new crushing and screening facilities and successfully completing a major drafting and design Consultants’ 3D modelling processes – which can associated conveyors were fabricated and erected contract for the expansion of a BHP Billiton iron ore halve design and detailing costs. by the Monadelphous Group and are expected to be mine in the Pilbara region.
  • (ASX100) Women on Boards Analysis

    (ASX100) Women on Boards Analysis

    Australia/NZ | Australia Thematic Investing (Citi) Equities 18 August 2011 │ 32 pages ESG: ASX100 Women on Board Analysis Increasing Focus on Board Diversity Women on Boards of ASX100 Companies — The ASX Corporate Governance Council’s new principles and recommendations on diversity commenced on 1 January Elaine Prior 2011. This is likely to lead to increasing focus on companies’ approaches to diversity +61-2-8225-4891 issues, including female representation on company boards. This report looks at data [email protected] on women directors on ASX100 company boards. The number of women directors has Felipe Faria increased, particularly in recent months (Figure 5 to Figure 8). Board diversity may [email protected] enhance effectiveness, by providing a wider range of perspectives and knowledge. Women on Boards Data — We collected and analysed data on female board directors of S&P/ASX100 companies from FY08 to 8 August 2011 (Figure 5 to Figure 9). At 8 August 2011 there were 134 women on ASX100 boards, a 46% increase from FY08. ASX100 companies with no female board directors were AQP, CQO, EGP, FMG, IPL, JHX, LEI, LYC, OSH, PDN, PRY, RHC, RMD, SGM and SWM. Companies with three female directors (the highest number identified) are AMP, BEN, CBA, MQG, QAN, QBE and WBC. Seven female directors each currently hold three ASX100 directorships. Business Case for Gender Diversity — Reibey Institute research found that those ASX500 companies with women directors on 30 June 2010 had a 3-year return on equity (ROE) 10.7% higher than those without any women directors. The 5-year ROE was 11.1% higher.
  • Big Business in Twentieth-Century Australia

    Big Business in Twentieth-Century Australia

    CENTRE FOR ECONOMIC HISTORY THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY SOURCE PAPER SERIES BIG BUSINESS IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY AUSTRALIA DAVID MERRETT UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE SIMON VILLE UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG SOURCE PAPER NO. 21 APRIL 2016 THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY ACTON ACT 0200 AUSTRALIA T 61 2 6125 3590 F 61 2 6125 5124 E [email protected] https://www.rse.anu.edu.au/research/centres-projects/centre-for-economic-history/ Big Business in Twentieth-Century Australia David Merrett and Simon Ville Business history has for the most part been dominated by the study of large firms. Household names, often with preserved archives, have had their company stories written by academics, journalists, and former senior employees. Broader national studies have analysed the role that big business has played in a country’s economic development. While sometimes this work has alleged oppressive anti-competitive behaviour, much has been written from a more positive perspective. Business historians, influenced by the pioneering work of Alfred Chandler, have implicated the ‘visible hand’ of large scale enterprise in national economic development particularly through their competitive strategies and modernised governance structures, which have facilitated innovation, the integration of national markets, and the growth of professional bureaucracies. While our understanding of the role of big business has been enriched by an aggregation of case studies, some writers have sought to study its impact through economy-wide lenses. This has typically involved constructing sets of the largest 100 or 200 companies at periodic benchmark years through the twentieth century, and then analysing their characteristics – such as their size, industrial location, growth strategies, and market share - and how they changed over time.
  • Sydney Airport Corporation

    Sydney Airport Corporation

    SYDNEY AIRPORT CORPORATION KEY data KEY CREDIT METRICS FINANCIAL YEAR END 31 DEC CREDIT RATING BBB/Baa2/BBB (S&P/Moody’s/Fitch) BLOOMBERG TICKER SYD AAU BOND PROTECTION ASX CODE SYD GEARING COVENANT Y (ND/EV<75%) KEY FINANCIALS HY12 FY11 FY10 Leverage ratio N REVENUES (A$M) 504 973 943 INTEREST COVER RATIO Y (>1.1x) EBITDA (A$M) 411 790 773 CHANGE OF CONTROL Y NET PROFIT (A$M)1 93 161 150 COUPON STEP-UP N NET PROFIT (A$M) (48.0) (121) (131.4) NET SENIOR DEBT/EBITDA (X) 7.32 6.6 6.5 (1) Excluding shareholder-related RPS finance costs. instruments and bank debt for its debt funding. It has on issue (2) Change in net senior debt/EBITDA is due to redemption of SKIES being the subordinated debt listed in the ASX in January 2012. Australian credit-wrapped and unwrapped MTNs, Australian credit-wrapped capital-indexed bonds, US 144A/Reg S secured About Sydney Airport notes and Canadian Maple market secured notes. ydney Airport is Australia’s busiest airport and At June 30 2012 SCACH Group had net debt of handles on average 98,000 passengers each day. A$6.02 billion. The average maturity of outstanding debt is Sydney Airport is the gateway to Sydney, which approximately eight years. The company has no further term is Australia’s largest city, most popular tourist debt maturities until Q4 2012. destination and financial capital. A total of 42% of The SCACH Group is continuing to diversify its debt SAustralia’s arriving and departing international passengers and portfolio and will be continuing to look at opportunities in 22% of all domestic and regional passengers fly through the the international capital markets in addition to bank debt and airport.
  • Camden Sound Marine Park Order 2012

    Camden Sound Marine Park Order 2012

    CO301* Conservation and Land Management Act 1984 Camden Sound Marine Park Order 2012 Made by the Governor in Executive Council under section 13(1) and (4) of the Act. 1. Citation This order is the Camden Sound Marine Park Order 2012. 2. Terms used In this order — coastal waters means “coastal waters of the State” as defined in the Coastal Waters (State Powers) Act 1980 (Commonwealth) section 3(1); high water mark has the meaning given in the Land Administration Act 1997 section 3(1); low water mark means the ordinary low water mark at spring tides; onshore place has the meaning given in the Native Title Act 1993 (Commonwealth) section 253. 3. Camden Sound Marine Park reserved and classified (1) The area described in Schedule 1 is reserved as a marine park, to be known as the Camden Sound Marine Park, and classified as of Class A. (2) The area described in Schedule 1 is shown on Deposited Plan No. 67933, held by the Western Australian Land Information Authority trading as Landgate. (3) A copy of Deposited Plan No. 67933 may be inspected during office hours at the Department’s offices at — (a) 111 Herbert Street, BROOME WA 6725; and (b) Lot 248 Ivanhoe Road, KUNUNURRA WA 6743; and (c) 17 Dick Perry Avenue, Technology Park, Western Precinct, KENSINGTON WA 6151. (4) For information purposes, a representation of the Camden Sound Marine Park is set out in Schedule 2. 4. Application of Geocentric Datum of Australia 1994 A reference in this order to a geographic coordinate is to a coordinate expressed in accordance with the Geocentric Datum of Australia 1994 (GDA 94).
  • Browse to NWS Development EPBC Act and EP Act Environmental

    Browse to NWS Development EPBC Act and EP Act Environmental

    Proposed Browse to NWS Development, EPBC Act and EP Act Environmental Referrals Supporting Document November 2018 Rev 0A BD0000RG0000037 Page 1 of 141 November 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 6 1.1 Overview of Proposed Action .......................................................................................... 6 1.2 Project History ................................................................................................................. 6 1.2.1 Initial Concept Select ................................................................................................... 6 1.2.2 James Price Point Concept ......................................................................................... 7 1.2.3 FLNG Concept ............................................................................................................ 7 1.2.4 Browse to North West Shelf Concept .......................................................................... 7 1.3 Comparison with Browse FLNG Concept ....................................................................... 7 1.4 Purpose and Scope of this Document ............................................................................ 8 1.4.1 Purpose ....................................................................................................................... 8 1.4.2 Scope .........................................................................................................................
  • Senate Inquiry Into Corporate Tax Avoidance and Minimisation

    Senate Inquiry Into Corporate Tax Avoidance and Minimisation

    Shell Australia Pty Ltd Committee Chair ABN 14 009 663 576 Senate Economics References Committee 2 Victoria Avenue PO Box 6100 Perth WA 6000 Parliament House Australia CANBERRA ACT 2600 Tel +61 8 9338 6000 Internet www.shell.com.au Correspondence 29 July 2015 PO BOX A47 CDC Perth WA 6837 Senate Inquiry into corporate tax avoidance and minimisation Shell Australia1 welcomes the opportunity to make this submission in response to your letter of 14th July 2015. 1. Background – About Shell Shell2 is a global group of energy and petrochemical companies, with its headquarters in The Hague, the Netherlands. Shell operates in over 70 countries around the world and employs around 94,000 people. In April 2015, the Boards of Royal Dutch Shell plc and BG Group plc agreed the terms of a proposed merger. The parties are targeting completion of the transaction in early 2016 and are currently seeking regulatory approvals in a number of jurisdictions. Subject to obtaining these approvals, the companies’ shareholders will then be asked to support the proposal. Shell in Australia Shell has been in Australia since 1901 and the Australian business forms an important part of Shell’s global natural gas business. Historically, our significant investments in Australia spanned across both the downstream and upstream sectors. In 2014 Shell sold its downstream refining, marketing and retail distribution operations to Vitol, and our business is now largely focused within the upstream sector – although Shell continues to supply aviation fuels and lubricants. 1 “Shell Australia” refers to Shell Australia Pty Ltd or any of the members of the Australian tax consolidated group of which Shell Energy Holdings Australia Ltd (SEHAL) is the head company.
  • Biological Opinion on U.S. Navy SURTASS LFA Sonar Activities 2019

    Biological Opinion on U.S. Navy SURTASS LFA Sonar Activities 2019

    Biological Opinion on U.S. Navy SURTASS LFA Sonar Activities Consultation No. OPR-2019-00120 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Consultation History ........................................................................................................ 3 2 The Assessment Framework ................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Evidence Available for the Consultation ......................................................................... 8 2.1.1 Approach to Assessing Effects to Marine Mammals ................................................ 9 2.1.2 Approach to Assessing Effects to Sea Turtles ........................................................ 24 3 Description of the Proposed Action ................................................................................... 25 3.1 The Navy’s Proposed Action ......................................................................................... 26 3.2 Description of the Surveillance Towed Array Sensor System (SURTASS) Low Frequency Active (LFA) Sonar System ................................................................................... 28 3.2.1 Passive Sonar System Components ........................................................................ 29 3.2.2 Active
  • Lalang-Garram / Camden Sound Marine Park E News CHARTER

    Lalang-Garram / Camden Sound Marine Park E News CHARTER

    Department of Fisheries Department of Parks and Wildlife Lalang-garram/Camden Sound Marine Park: News update for charter fishers and commercial tour operators – Issue 3 Management plan approved The Minister for Environment has approved and released the Lalang-garram/Camden Sound Marine Park Management Plan 2013-2023, which can be downloaded from the Department of Parks and Wildlife (DPaW) website at www.dpaw.wa.gov.au The focus is on management goals and delivering programs to protect key resources. The park will be jointly managed by the Dambimangari native title group and DPaW, in collaboration with the Department of Fisheries. The managers can now start implementing the strategies described in the plan. This will include gazetting the park zoning scheme under the Conservation and Land Management Act 1984 (CALM Act) and complementary orders under the Fish Resources Management Act 1994 (FRMA). Until these notices and orders are in place, the proposed zoning scheme does not have any legal effect, and there are no formal restrictions on fishing as a result of the scheme. We will keep you informed. Lalang-garram/Camden Sound Marine Park You may have noticed an addition to the name of the marine park: Lalang-garram/Camden Sound Marine Park. In order to reflect the significance of the marine park to the Dambimangari Traditional Owners, a senior Dambimangari woman has suggested that the park be named Lalang-garram, which evokes the salt water as a spiritual place as well as a place of natural abundance. Lalang-garram is the word in Worrora (the Dambimangari native title group language) that evokes ‘the ocean’ in its most general sense.
  • Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 156/Tuesday, August 13, 2019

    Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 156/Tuesday, August 13, 2019

    40132 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 13, 2019 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The MMPA prohibits the ‘‘take’’ of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Purpose for Regulatory Action marine mammals, with certain Administration These regulations, issued under the exceptions. Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and authority of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et 50 CFR Part 218 et seq.), establish a framework for seq.) direct the Secretary of Commerce [190731–0008] authorizing the take of marine mammals (as delegated to NMFS) to allow, upon incidental to the Navy’s use of RIN 0648–BI42 request, the incidental, but not SURTASS LFA sonar systems onboard intentional, taking of small numbers of U.S. Navy surveillance ships for training Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to marine mammals by U.S. citizens who and testing activities (categorized as Specified Activities: Taking Marine engage in a specified activity (other than military readiness activities) conducted Mammals Incidental to U.S. Navy commercial fishing) within a specified under the authority of the Secretary of Surveillance Towed Array Sensor geographical region if certain findings the Navy in the western and central System Low Frequency Active Sonar are made and either regulations are North Pacific Ocean and eastern Indian Training and Testing in the Central and issued or, if the taking is limited to Ocean. Western North Pacific Ocean and harassment, an incidental harassment Eastern Indian Ocean NMFS received an application from authorization may be issued following the Navy requesting regulations and an notice and opportunity for public AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries associated letter of authorization (LOA) comment.