DOCSLIB.ORG

GJ Pothier Orcid.Org/0000-0003-1037-9424

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GJ Pothier Orcid.Org/0000-0003-1037-9424 Faith and the sacramental dignity of marriage: Canonical considerations of the effects of radical error and simulation GJ Pothier orcid.org/0000-0003-1037-9424 Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Church Polity at the North-West University Promoter: Prof Dr P Coertzen Co-promoters: Prof Dr H Warnink Prof Dr J Smit Graduation: October 2019 Student number: 26790408 Declaration I declare that this thesis has been composed solely by myself and that it has not been submitted, in whole or in part, in any previous application for a degree, except for this one. Except where stated otherwise by reference or acknowledgment, the work presented is entirely my own. ii Abstract The CIC/83 contains 110 canons on marriage in cc. 1055 – 1165. The canons are a compilation of theological statements that are presented in juridical terms. The first canon, c. 1055, states that (§1) the marriage covenant, for the baptized, has been raised to the dignity of a sacrament by Christ the Lord and that (§2) a valid marriage contract cannot exist between baptized persons without being a sacrament. The requirements of cc. 1099 and 1101, §2 are that one must not be in error about or exclude the sacramental dignity of marriage at the time of the exchange of consent. In 1977, the International Theological Commission admitted the existence of baptized unbelievers and baptized non-Catholics who neither understand nor believe in the sacramentality of marriage, nor exchange it at the moment of consent. Through research on the historical development of theological and canonical principles, it becomes increasingly clear that the theologico-juridico principles of c. 1055 and the sacramentality of marriage must be revisited. Key Words Marriage, sacramentality, sacramental dignity, 1980 Synod of Bishops, baptized non- believers, intention against sacramentality, radical error, contract, covenant, faith, Roman Rota, simulation, exclusion, Mitis Iudex, Subsidium iii Abbreviations, Initialisms, Acronyms, Symbols CCC Catechism of the Catholic Church CIC/17 1917 Code of Canon Law CIC/83 1983 Code of Canon Law c. Canon, with reference to canon law cc. Canons, with reference to canon law DOPB Diocese of Palm Beach DOPBT Diocese of Palm Beach Tribunal ITC International Theological Commission § and ° Section number, used in ecclesiastical documents divided into sections or paragraphs PCF Pontifical Commission for the Family PCRC Pontifical Commission for the Revision of the Code iv Acknowledgements This decision to pursue this investigation is related to my professional ministry as a Roman Catholic priest of the Diocese of Palm Beach. I am working full-time as a canon lawyer in the Tribunal and Office of Canonical Services and teaching canon law at Saint Vincent de Paul Regional Seminary, located in the territory of the Diocese of Palm Beach, which serves the seven dioceses that make up the Province of Miami. Time and again it has been observed that the sacral nature of marriage has been eroded, and that the parties to a marriage no longer marry according to the mind of the Church because they lack the fervent faith that past generations seemed to have enjoyed. This study has two interwoven aspects: the first, which is canonical and related to annulments, provided a way for me to address the issues surrounding the breakdown of marriage due to lack of faith in the judicial forum; the second, and probably more important, is the question of what has been, or can be, done to curb this disturbing trend. What good would a study be if it only focused on problems without providing viable solutions? This work would not have been possible without the assistance of a good Catholic man, Mr. John Rooney. With a generous heart he provided financial assistance over several years, allowing for the completion of this study without hardship. I wish to thank Prof. Piotr Coertzen of the faculty of Stellenbosch University, my thesis supervisor and promoter, for his invaluable insights and guidance in ecclesiastical law. Through his efforts and tutelage, he helped focus my work and proffered numerous suggestions to achieve my goal. May I also express my thanks to Dr. Hildegard Warnink of the faculty of Leuven University and Prof. Johannes Smit of North-West University, who were co-promoters and assisted Prof. Coertzen in his supervision. The staff of North-West University and Greenwich School of Theology could not have been nicer or more patient with me. I am grateful to Mrs. Peg Evans and Mrs. Tienie Buys for their gracious responses to my questions. I am grateful to my family and friends, and to my coworkers who tolerated my academic research in the midst of a busy office. They were all a constant source of encouragement, and without their patience and support this task would have been so much more difficult. Finally, I am grateful for the gift of life that God has given me, and that I can live it out to the fullest in assisting the People of God on their journey. May He bless you all. Archimandrite Glen J. Pothier February 2019 v Contents 1. Chapter one: Background and problem statement / questions arising ............. 1 1.1 Background and problem statement .................................................................... 1 1.1.1. Background ............................................................................................... 1 1.1.2. Problem statement ..................................................................................... 2 1.1.3. Research questions ................................................................................... 2 1.2 Research aims and objectives ............................................................................. 3 1.2.1. Aims ........................................................................................................... 3 1.2.2. Objectives .................................................................................................. 3 1.2.3. Central theoretical argument ...................................................................... 4 1.3. Research methodology ....................................................................................... 4 1.3.1. Description of the methodology .................................................................. 4 1.3.2. Literature review......................................................................................... 4 1.3.3. Databases and sources used ..................................................................... 4 1.4. Concept clarification............................................................................................ 4 1.5. Ethical considerations ......................................................................................... 5 1.6. Classification of chapters .................................................................................... 5 2. Chapter two: Nature of sacramental dignity in canon law: history and canonical developments .................................................................. 6 2.1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 6 2.2. Historical development of c. 1055 ....................................................................... 8 2.3. Inseparability of contract and sacrament for the baptized ................................. 11 2.4. The architect of the CIC/17: Cardinal Gasparri.................................................. 14 2.5. Canonical developments: personalism .............................................................. 16 vi 2.6. Canonical developments: contract / covenant ................................................... 18 2.7. Ex opere operato .............................................................................................. 22 2.8. 1980 Synod of Bishops ..................................................................................... 25 2.9. Post-Second Vatican Council: ITC and Familiaris consortio .............................. 28 2.10. A catechumenate for sacramental marriage .................................................... 32 2.11. Identification of the baptized unbelievers ........................................................ 33 3. Chapter three: Comparison of 1917 and 1983 codices regarding radical error and simulation .............................................................. 35 3.1. The scholastic philosophical understanding of making decisions: intellect and will ............................................................................................... 35 3.2. Radical error ..................................................................................................... 35 3.2.1. Marriage as a juridic act ........................................................................... 36 3.2.2. Determining error ..................................................................................... 41 3.3. Canonical developments specifically related to error and to simulation of consent ................................... 42 3.3.1. Ignorance and simple error ...................................................................... 42 3.3.2. Pre-conciliar ............................................................................................. 42 3.4. Between Second Vatican Council and the CIC/83 ............................................ 44 3.5. CIC/83 .............................................................................................................. 45 3.6. Simulation ........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Title 30. Husband and Wife Chapter 1 Marriage
    Utah Code Title 30. Husband and Wife Chapter 1 Marriage 30-1-1 Incestuous marriages void. (1) The following marriages are incestuous and void from the beginning, whether the relationship is legitimate or illegitimate: (a) marriages between parents and children; (b) marriages between ancestors and descendants of every degree; (c) marriages between siblings of the half as well as the whole blood; (d) marriages between: (i) uncles and nieces or nephews; or (ii) aunts and nieces or nephews; (e) marriages between first cousins, except as provided in Subsection (2); or (f) marriages between any individuals related to each other within and not including the fifth degree of consanguinity computed according to the rules of the civil law, except as provided in Subsection (2). (2) First cousins may marry under the following circumstances: (a) both parties are 65 years of age or older; or (b) if both parties are 55 years of age or older, upon a finding by the district court, located in the district in which either party resides, that either party is unable to reproduce. Amended by Chapter 317, 2019 General Session 30-1-2 Marriages prohibited and void. (1) The following marriages are prohibited and declared void: (a) when there is a spouse living, from whom the individual marrying has not been divorced; (b) except as provided in Subsection (2), when an applicant is under 18 years old; and (c) between a divorced individual and any individual other than the one from whom the divorce was secured until the divorce decree becomes absolute, and, if an appeal is taken, until after the affirmance of the decree.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature and Peculiarities of the Briefer Process Before the Bishop
    Nature and peculiarities of the briefer process before the Bishop Msgr. Alejandro W. BUNGE CLSA, October 13th, 2020 Introduction The legislative initiative of Pope Francis to renew the special procedural law that governs the process to declare the nullity of marriage1 came at an opportune time. The simplification and speed up of the process was requested by the Bishops of the whole world, and the III Extraordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops asked “the possibility of determining an administrative path under the responsibility of the diocesan bishop”, and also “a summary process to be initiated in cases of self-evident nullity” 2. While the first of these proposals has not been accepted, thus preserving the judicial procedure for the declaration of nullity, “not because it is imposed by the nature of the thing, but rather by the need to protect the truth of the sacred bond to the utmost degree”3, the second one was accepted by the Holy Father, establishing the process we are now presenting. This new process to declare the nullity of marriage, called the “briefer marriage process before the Bishop”4, which is added and does not overlap or merge with existing ones (the ordinary and the documentary), is what likely arouses most curiosity, not just for the novelty, but also and perhaps especially because its decision is entitled to the Bishop. The name itself entails the mission of the new process (brevior) making it clear that even the ordinary process to declare the nullity of marriage has been simplified and streamlined compared to the existing process before December the 8th, this new process, then, is to be intended not only to speed up the treatment of nullity cases, but also as the right tool to respond to those faithful who find themselves in the particular circumstance of an evident case of nullity, and at the same time, with an easily and irrefutable proven 1 FRANCIS, Litt.
    [Show full text]
  • Fletcher Class – Supplemental Tribal Law Materials Williams V. Lee
    Fletcher Class – Supplemental Tribal Law Materials Williams v. Lee Notes 1. Professor Wilkinson described the historical context of this landmark decision as follows: The rendering of the Williams decision can fairly be set as a watershed for several reasons. For decades before, Indian law decisions had been rendered fitfully by the Supreme Court. The tribes and the federal government instituted few cases to establish or expand tribal powers. Most of the litigation to reach the Court during the twentieth century before 1959 arose out of disputes involving individual Indians or even non- Indians; as a result the decisions lacked the public law overtones of either the modern era or the nineteenth century. * * * After Williams, the pace of decisions began to accelerate, with the result that the Court has become more active in Indian law than in fields such as securities, bankruptcy, pollution control and international law. Wilkinson, American Indians, Time and the Law, supra, at 1–2. 2. Justice Black cites the "courageous and eloquent" opinion of Chief Justice Marshall in Worcester as the source of the "basic policy" informing the infringement test announced by the Court in Williams: "Absent governing acts of Congress, the question has always been whether the state action infringed on the right of reservation Indians to make their own laws and be ruled by them." Did Williams depart from the basic legal analysis of tribal jurisdiction in Worcester? How would you state the Williams approach if you were an advocate asserting state jurisdiction over reservation Indians? If you were a tribal judge asserting exclusive tribal court civil adjudicatory jurisdiction over a non-Indian on the reservation? 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Order of Celebrating Matrimony Preparation and Policies
    ORDER OF CELEBRATING MATRIMONY PREPARATION AND POLICIES FOR CORPUS CHRISTI UNIVERSITY PARISH TOLEDO, OHIO Short-term preparations for marriage tend to be concentrated on invitations, clothes, the party and any number of other details that tend to drain not only the budget but energy and joy as well. The spouses come to the wedding ceremony exhausted and harried, rather than focused and ready for the great step that they are about to take. Here let me say a word to fiancés. Have the courage to be different. Don’t let yourselves get swallowed up by a society of consumption and empty appearances. What is important is the love you share, strengthened and sanctified by grace. You are capable of opting for a more modest and simple celebration in which love takes precedence over everything else. Pope Francis, Amoris Laetitia #212 Congratulations on your upcoming marriage. Marriage is a serious and sacred commitment. Through it, husband and wife are called on to draw closer to God and to each other in a life-giving community of love. Christ enhanced the dignity of marriage by making the Christian marriage relationship a Sacrament - a living expression of His love for us. Marriage is also a great and marvelous adventure. It is an understanding that holds the promise of joyful years together. People enter marriage with high hopes of a beautiful future together. It is this atmosphere that brings out the best qualities of each person in marriage. Today, more than during the immediate past, the Church has a grave responsibility to help our people enter into a marriage that gives promise of being grace-filled, happy and successful.
    [Show full text]
  • DISPENSATION and ECONOMY in the Law Governing the Church Of
    DISPENSATION AND ECONOMY in the law governing the Church of England William Adam Dissertation submitted in part fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Wales Cardiff Law School 2009 UMI Number: U585252 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U585252 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 CONTENTS SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................................IV ACKNOWLEDGMENTS..................................................................................................................................VI ABBREVIATIONS............................................................................................................................................VII TABLE OF STATUTES AND MEASURES............................................................................................ VIII U K A c t s o f P a r l i a m e n
    [Show full text]
  • 1. GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1. Course Teacher Prof. Josip Šalković
    1. GENERAL INFORMATION Prof. Josip Šalković, PhD / 1.1. Course teacher 1.6. Year of the study programme 3 Assist. Prof. Lucija Boljat, PhD 1.2. Name of the course Canon Law 1.7. Credits (ECTS) 6 1.3. Associate teachers 1.8. Type of instruction (number of hours L + S + E + e-learning) 60 L 1.4. Study programme (undergraduate, graduate, Undergraduate 1.9. Expected enrolment in the course 40 integrated) 1.10. Level of application of e-learning (level 1, 2, 3), percentage of 1.5. Status of the course Compulsory online instruction (max. 20%) 2. COURSE DESCRIPTION To capacitate students and direct them to know, understand, comment and apply the provisions of Canon Law of the Latin Church, 2.1. Course particularly the 1983 Code of Canon Law which is inseparable from the mission of RI teachers in primary and secondary schools or objectives the mission of catechists in parish and deacon communities and finally the mission of the lay parish associate. 2.2. Course enrolment requirements and To have a fundamental knowledge of Church history, exegesis, dogma, philosophy and fundamental theology. entry competences required for the To have a fundamental knowledge of Latin. course To apply their knowledge of Canon Law in all curriculums when planning and conducting RI classes in primary and 2.3. Learning outcomes at the secondary schools; level of the programme to To apply their knowledge of Canon Law in pastoral activities with children, adolescents and adults; which the course contributes To interpret and apply Canon Law in the Church and society, in the school and in the parish community; To capacitate students to actively and properly participate in the task of evangelisation in the Church and society.
    [Show full text]
  • NULLITY of MARRIAGE
    NULLITY of MARRIAGE New Edition--Revised and Enlarged F. J. Sheed SHEED AND WARD--NEW YORK Copyright SHEED & WARD, INC., 1959 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOG CARD NUMBER 59-10656 NIHIL OBSTAT: JOHN R. READY CENSOR LIBRORUM MAY 22,1959 IMPRIMATUR: +ROBERT F. JOYCE BISHOP OF BURLINGTON MAY 28,1959 TO THE LAW SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY THIS SMALL TOKEN OF GREAT GRATITUDE Preface to the Second Edition This is not a book on marriage; but only on those cases where marriage appears to be but is not. It is directly concerned with the law of the Catholic Church, but in the first edition I introduced comparisons with the law of England. I have been asked to introduce comparisons with American Law as well, because its historic connection with Church Law is considerably less than England's. As each of the fifty States has its own marriage law, and it would have been impossible to study them all, I chose that of New York. New York's Marriage Law was not taught in the Sydney University Law School in my day, as any American who chances on this book will guess. But its rules, like those of England, are stated here only in their general form, exceptions or modifications not being mentioned where they would not affect the principle. The subject of the book is Church Law. The object of the comparison is not to make civil law and Church law look as much alike as possible, in the hope that the great mass of similarity may lead to an indulgent overlooking of the points on which the Church differs; but to show her laws more clearly by noting how two other codes treat the same problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Catholic Church's Pastoral Counseling Role in Addressing
    68 African Research Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 5(2), 2018 ISSN (online): 2312-0134 | Website : www.arjess.org Catholic Church’s Pastoral Counseling Role in Addressing Domestic Violence against Women in Marriage in Muranga County, Kenya Author: Evan Njuguna Mburu Kenyatta University P.O Box 43844-00100 Nairobi – Kenya Author E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The main purpose of this study was to examine the role of pastoral counseling by the Catholic Church in addressing domestic violence against women in marriage, in Maragua Parish, Murang’a County. Survey research design was used in this study. The main respondents of this study population were the married couples. The target population for this study was 5420 catholic church members. The sample size included 360 married couples from the parish. Random sampling procedure was used to arrive at the sample. The main research instruments used in the study was questionnaire. Quantitative data analysis procedure was used where data were analyzed and reported in frequencies and percentages and summarized using figures and tables. Quantitative analytical software, namely SPSS was used to process the data. The results showed that Catholic church played a critical role in addressing domestic violence against women in marriage through increasing confidence and self-esteem among women. The study also took into account the contribution of the male members of the society, with a call to respect women and help create coexistence in the society. This study informs the role that faith based organizations could play in addressing gender based disparities in society. Keywords: Pastoral Counselling, Catholic Church's role in Addressing Domestic Violence, Violence against women, Women in Marriage 1.0 Introduction Domestic violence has been a common problem in most families worldwide, and the problem affects both men and women.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Entire Issue in PDF Format
    ‘That Man Is You!’ Read about this program in our annual Religious Education Supplement, pages 9-12. Serving the Church in Central and Southern Indiana Since 1960 CriterionOnline.com September 12, 2014 Vol. LIV, No. 48 75¢ Pope appoints 14 couples to Caring for the whole person attend Synod of Bishops on family VATICAN CITY (CNS)—More than 250 participants, including 14 married couples from around the world, are expected to attend October’s extraordinary Synod of Bishops on the family. In addition to 114 presidents of national bishops’ conferences, 13 heads of Eastern Catholic churches and 25 heads of Vatican congregations and councils, the pope appointed 26 synod fathers to take part in the Oct. 5-19 synod. A list of the appointments was released on Sept. 9 by the Vatican. Almost all of the 26 papally appointed voting members are from Europe. Of these, none of Pope Francis the 14 cardinals, Dr. Casey Reising, right, shares a moment of joy with Kim Haley, an office assistant who works in Magnificat Family Medicine, the new Indianapolis eight bishops and medical practice that Reising named to honor the Blessed Mother. (Photo by John Shaughnessy) four priests appointed by the pope is from North America or other English-speaking countries. Some of the papal appointees include Young doctor focuses on patients’ dignity German Cardinal Walter Kasper, Belgian Cardinal Godfried Danneels, and Italian as she leads Catholic health care group Cardinal Elio Sgreccia, as well as Jesuit Father Antonio Spadaro, director By John Shaughnessy hands and his feet, to take care of all those learn more about our faith and the of La Civilta Cattolica journal, and I encounter—to really love every person I Church’s beautiful teachings about Msgr.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenneth E. Boccafola October 16, 2013
    RESPONSE TO THE ROLE OF LAW AWARD Reverend Kenneth E. Boccafola October 16, 2013 I thank President Vaughan for his kind words of introduction and I want to express my deep gratitude to him, to the Board of Governors, and to the entire CSLA membership, for the honor they have accorded me by presenting me with the Canon Law Society’s prestigious Role of Law Award. I have always valued my membership in this Society and so it is truly a pleasure, though an unexpected and undeserved one, for me to be considered worthy to join the list of distinguished American canonists who have received this recognition in prior years. It is natural that, at the time the Society is celebrating its’ 75th year, and honoring the past, our thoughts should turn to our history and those who have preceded us. My memory calls to mind the names of the many canonists of my generation that I encountered at the Society’s conventions, some now no longer with us, like Larry Wrenn, Fred McManus, Jim Provost, Ed Pfnausch, Bill Varvaro, and others who are thankfully still making their important contribution as canonists like Tom Green, Jack Alesandro, Jim Coriden, and Frank Morrissey. Once I received the call to Rome to become a Judge of the Roman Rota, I was unfortunately no longer able to attend the annual conventions because of distance and the time frame in which the conventions are generally scheduled, and so I was not able to come to know too many of our more recent members, unless they had studied in Rome or took part in the Society’s Rome visits.
    [Show full text]
  • Prajak Boonphao Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Canon Law, Saint
    CANONICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN PASTORAL CARE OF PERSONS IN MARRIAGES BETWEEN ROMAN CATHOLICS AND BUDDHISTS IN THAILAND Prajak Boonphao Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Canon Law, Saint Paul University, Ottawa, Canada, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Canon Law Faculty of Canon Law Saint Paul University, Ottawa © Prajak Boonphao, Ottawa, Canada, 2020 ii ABSTRACT Marriage is an institution based on natural law. Every person has the natural right to marriage which is, however, affected by cultural and social conditions. The pastors of the Church, therefore, have to make every effort to understand the particularity of situations within which marriage and family are lived today and respond accordingly through their pastoral action. Thailand is considered a Buddhist country due to the fact that the vast majority of its population is Buddhist. Most marriages celebrated in the Catholic Church are non- sacramental because a Buddhist is the spouse of the Catholic party. Canon 1086 of the 1983 Code states that due to the impediment of disparity of worship, a marriage between a person who was baptized in the Catholic Church or received into it and a non-baptized person is invalid. A dispensation from this impediment must be granted by the competent authority in order for the union to be valid. The conditions stated in cc. 1125–1126 must be taken into account for a dispensation to be granted. The thesis identifies the actual pastoral problems faced by persons in marriages with the disparity of worship and canonical questions faced by Church authorities; it also proposes canonical-pastoral responses to such cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Marriage DISPENSATION Request Diocese of Toledo Office of the Bishop 1933 Spielbusch Ave
    MARRIAGE DISPENSATION REQUEST Diocese of Toledo Office of the Bishop 1933 Spielbusch Ave. Toledo, Ohio 43604-5360 Date ___________________________________ 20______ Marriage Information _______________________________________ Catholic, Priest/Deacon ____________________________________ Name, if woman, maiden name residing in _____________________________________ Parish City Parish ___________________________________________ wishing to marry _______________________________________________ Address _________________________________________ Name, if woman, maiden name Denomination (if Catholic _____________________________________) City _________________________ Zip ________________ Parish City PLEASE CHECK ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: MAIL TO: Diocese of Toledo Office of the Bishop ❑ Baptized Catholic ❑ Baptized non-Catholic ❑ Non-baptized ❑ Doubtfully baptized 1933 Spielbusch Ave., Toledo, Ohio 43604-5360 PRE-NUPTIAL DECLARATION AND PROMISE (Promise must be made in every marriage involving a non-Catholic, or one who has left the church by a formal act.) By the Catholic Party: I reaffirm my faith in Jesus Christ, and with God’s help, intend to continue living that faith in the Catholic Church. At the same time I acknowledge the respect I owe to the conscience of my partner in marriage. I promise to do all that I can to share the faith I have received with our children and to make every effort that I can to have them baptized and reared as Catholics. ___________________________________________ Signature of Catholic Party ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ Signature of Priest/Deacon City Date Dispensation Requested: ____ Dispensation from disparity of worship for a mixed marriage between a Catholic and a non-baptized person (Disparity of Cult) ____ A precautionary dispensation from disparity of worship and a permission for mixed religion for a marriage between a Catholic and a doubtfully baptized member of another Christian Church.
    [Show full text]