Konrad Raczkowski Public Management Theory and Practice 4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Konrad Raczkowski Public Management Theory and Practice 4^1 Springer O.ST f" 'S 1 State as a Special Organisation of Society 1 1.1 Notion and Origins of the State 1 1.2 State According to Social Teachings of the Church 4 1.3 Tasks for State as the System of Institutions 6 1.4 Governance Versus Public Management 9 References 16 2 Flanning and Decision Making in Public Management 21 2.1 The Essence of Flanning 21 2.2 Decisions and Their Classification 27 2.3 Decision Making in Conditions of Certainty, Risk and Uncertainty 33 2.4 Heterogeneous Knowledge in Strategie Flanning and Decision Making 36 2.5 Flanning and Decision Making in Political Transformation 38 2.6 Institutional Development Flanning on Local Government Level (IDF Method) 45 References 49 3 State Organisation for Institutional and Systemic Perspective 55 3.1 Dynamic Equilibrium of Organised Things 55 3.2 New Institutional Economy and State Organisation 58 3.3 Virtual Social Structure in Actual State Organisation 62 3.4 Organisational Social System of the State 64 3.5 Role of Non-governmental Organisations in the State 68 3.6 Main Models of State Organisation 73 3.7 Models of Organisation of Unitary States 80 3.8 Organisation of Multilevel Management in European Union 87 References 93 4 Managing and Leading in Public Organisations 99 4.1 Managing the Intellectual Capital in Public Organisation 99 4.2 Leadership in Network-Dominated Public Sphere 104 xiii xiv Contents 4.3 Global Crisis of Public Leadership 111 4.4 Information and Disinformation: Key Tools of State Management 117 References 122 5 Control and Its Regulative Function in Public Management 127 5.1 Efficiency and Effectiveness in Control Process 127 5.2 Control as Management Function 130 5.3 Main Indexes of Global Control of Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Development 135 5.4 Diagnosing Efficiency of State as Organisation 139 5.5 Management Capability Index 147 References 150 6 Governance and Public Management Practice in Poland 153 6.1 Synthetic Characteristic of Empirical Research 153 6.2 Prime Ministers About Managing the State 165 6.2.1 Tadeusz Mazowiecki 165 6.2.2 Jan Krzysztof Bielecki 168 6.2.3 Jan Olszewski 172 6.2.4 Waldemar Pawlak 178 6.2.5 Hanna Suchocka 182 6.2.6 Jözef Oleksy 187 6.2.7 Wlodzimierz Cimoszewicz 190 6.2.8 Jerzy Buzek 205 6.2.9 Leszek Miller 211 6.2.10 Marek Belka 215 6.2.11 Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz 219 6.2.12 Jaroslaw Kaczynski 223 Summary 233 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

UNEP Letterhead
Sustainability – Risks and Opportunities for Polish Financial Institutions Zrownowazony Rozwoj – Ryzyko oraz Korzysci dla Polskiego Sektora Finansowego Agenda Time Programme – 16 March 2005 Program – 16 marca 2005 12.30 Registration Rejestracja 13.00 Introduction Wprowadzenie Mark King, Environmental Department, EBRD Mark King, Wydział Ochrony Środowiska, EBOiR 13.10 Key Note Speech: Why do Financial Institutions pay Słowo wstępne: Dlaczego instytucje finansowe muszą attention to environmental issues? przywiązywac wagę do spraw ochrony środowiska Krzysztof Bielecki, CEO, Pekao SA Krzysztof Bielecki, Prezes, Pekao SA 13.40 Summary of Environmental Legal Issues Facing Podsumowanie prawnych aspektów ochrony środowiska z Financial Institutions. którymi stykają się instytucje finansowe. Environmental Liabilities following EU Accession Odpowiedzialność prawna po wejściu do UE Waleria Szczuka-Skarzynska, Clifford Chance Waleria Szczuka-Skarzynska, Clifford Chance 14.00 Case study – Polish Privatization and Environmental Prywatyzacja w Polsce i aspekty ochrony środowiska – Issues. przyklady. How environmental issues have affected privatization Jak aspekty ochrony środowiska wpłyneły na tranzakcje transactions and some lessons learned prywatyzacyjne Piotr Syryczynski, Atkins Polska Piotr Syryczyński, Atkins Polska 14.20 EBRD ’s experience in CEE – Environmental Risks Doświadczenie EBOiRu w Europie Środkowej i Wschodniej and Opportunities (ESW) – ryzyko i korzyści płynące z ochrony środowiska Dariusz Prasek and Robert Adamczyk, Environmental Dariusz
[Show full text]
The Polish Liberal Project in Jan Krzysztof Bielecki's Policy Statement
Roczniki Historii Socjologii ISSN 2084–2031 • Vol. X (2019) p p. 9 3 –1 1 0 The Polish Liberal Project in Jan Krzysztof Bielecki’s Policy Statement Sławomir Drelich Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń Jan Krzysztof Bielecki’s liberal project—introduction The office of the first non-communist prime minister in post-war Poland was held by Tadeusz Mazowiecki. Linked with Solidarity from its beginnings, Mazowiecki began his political career in the PAX Association, on whose behalf he was elected to the Sejm of the Polish People’s Republic. Mazowiecki’s biography perfectly exemplifies the struggle of the generation which grew up during occupation and in Stalinist times, with a political regime imposed on the Poles. Mazowiecki’s policy statement, delivered on 24 August 1989, undoubtedly marked a symbolic end of the communist era in Poland. Although the message of Mazowiecki’s statement suited the period of transition that Poland was about to undergo, it did not provide a specific vision of Poland’s new political system. 93 Sławomir Drelich Mazowiecki was succeeded by Jan Krzysztof Bielecki, a politician younger than him by a generation; Bielecki was born in the Polish People’s Republic, and was also associated with Solidarity’s expert committee. While this organization essentially provided Bielecki with the first experience in his social and political career, he is considered as one of the so called “Gdańsk liberals” (Knoch 2015: 111–114). This is why Bielecki’s policy statement differed significantly from the policy statement of his opponent, as it includes a more precisely-put idea of the new political, economic and social system.
[Show full text]
Być Premierem
Być premierem Materiał składa się z sekcji: "Premierzy III RP", "Tadeusz Mazowiecki", "Premierzy II Rzeczpospolitej". Materiał zawiera: - 19 ilustracji (fotograﬁi, obrazów, rysunków), 3 ćwiczenia; - wirtualny spacer po kancelarii Prezesa Rady Ministrów wraz z opisem jej historii; - opis informacji i opinii o Tadeuszu Mazowieckim wraz ćwiczeniem do wykonania na ich podstawie; - zdjęcie, na którym przedstawiono premiera Tadeusza Mazowieckiego w 1989 r.; - galerię zdjęć premierów III RP (Tadeusz Mazowiecki, Jan Krzysztof Bielecki, Jan Olszewski, Waldemar Pawlak, Hanna Suchocka, Józef Oleksy, Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz, Jerzy Buzek, Leszek Miller, Marek Belka, Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz, Jarosław Kaczyński, Donald Tusk, Ewa Kopacz, Beata Szydło); - opis działalności politycznej premierów II RP (Wincenty Witos, Walery Sławek, Felicjan Sławoj Składkowski); - zdjęcie, na którym przedstawiono Wincentego Witosa przemawiającego do tłumu; - zdjęcie, na którym przedstawiono Walerego Sławka; - zdjęcie, na którym przedstawiono Felicjana Sławoj Składkowskiego przemawiającego do urzędników Prezydium Rady Ministrów; - ćwiczenie, które polega na poszukaniu i przedstawieniu różnych ciekawostek o życiu znanych polityków z okresu II i III Rzeczypospolitej; - propozycje pytań do dyskusji na tematy polityczne; - ćwiczenie, które polega na opracowaniu galerii premierów II RP. Być premierem Kancelaria Prezesa Rady Ministrów Laleczki, licencja: CC BY-SA 4.0 Zobacz, jak wygląda kancelaria Prezesa Rady Ministrów, miejsce pracy premiera. Źródło: PANORAMIX, licencja: CC BY 3.0. Premierzy III RP Sprawowanie urzędu premiera to wielki zaszczyt, ale i ogromna odpowiedzialność. Prezes Rady Ministrów jest zgodnie z Konstytucją RP dopiero czwartą osobą w państwie (po prezydencie, marszałakch Sejmu i Senatu), ale w praktyce skupia w swoich rękach niemal całą władzę wykonawczą. Od decyzji, które podejmuje szef rządu, zależy jakość życia wielu milionów ludzi. Znane są dzieje narodów, które pod mądrym przewodnictwem rozkwitały, a pod złym popadały w biedę i chaos.
[Show full text]
Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej
CENTRUM BADANIA OPINII SPOŁECZNEJ SEKRETARIAT 629 - 35 - 69, 628 - 37 - 04 UL. ŻURAWIA 4A, SKR. PT.24 OŚRODEK INFORMACJI 693 - 46 - 92, 625 - 76 - 23 00 - 503 W A R S Z A W A TELEFAX 629 - 40 - 89 INTERNET http://www.cbos.pl E-mail: [email protected] BS/48/2009 ZAUFANIE DO POLITYKÓW W MARCU KOMUNIKAT Z BADAŃ WARSZAWA, MARZEC 2009 PRZEDRUK I ROZPOWSZECHNIANIE MATERIAŁÓW CBOS W CAŁOŚCI LUB W CZĘŚCI ORAZ WYKORZYSTANIE DANYCH EMPIRYCZNYCH JEST DOZWOLONE WYŁĄCZNIE Z PODANIEM ŹRÓDŁA W marcu1 politykiem cieszącym się wśród Polaków największym zaufaniem jest minister spraw zagranicznych Radosław Sikorski (61%), który minimalnie wyprzedza w tym rankingu premiera Donalda Tuska (59%) oraz Lecha Wałęsę (58%). Zaufaniem nieco ponad połowy Polaków cieszy się marszałek Sejmu Bronisław Komorowski (52%), niewiele mniej osób ufa wicepremierowi i ministrowi gospodarki Waldemarowi Pawlakowi (50%). Na zbliżonym poziomie kształtuje się też zaufanie do Włodzimierza Cimoszewicza (48%), którego nazwisko ponownie umieściliśmy na naszej liście w związku ze zgłoszeniem jego kandydatury na stanowisko sekretarza generalnego Rady Europy. Kolejne miejsca w rankingu zaufania do polityków, jednak już z wyraźnie słabszym wynikiem, zajmują liderzy ugrupowań lewicowych Marek Borowski (40%) oraz Wojciech Olejniczak (37%). Poza czołówką najpopularniejszych polityków znalazł się w tym miesiącu Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz, do którego zaufanie deklaruje obecnie co trzeci ankietowany (33%). Niemal tyle samo sympatyków mają prezydent Lech Kaczyński (32% deklaracji zaufania), minister zdrowia Ewa Kopacz (32%) oraz szef MON Bogdan Klich (31%). Zaufaniem niespełna jednej trzeciej badanych cieszą się: przewodniczący klubu parlamentarnego PO Zbigniew Chlebowski (29%), Janusz Palikot (29%), a także wicepremier i szef MSWiA Grzegorz Schetyna (28%). Co czwarty respondent deklaruje zaufanie do marszałka Senatu Bogdana Borusewicza (26%) oraz do lidera głównej partii opozycyjnej Jarosława Kaczyńskiego (25%).
[Show full text]
Interview with Waldemar Pawlak Polish Brands Cities and Regions
■ Interview with Waldemar Pawlak ■ Polish brands ■ Cities and regions ■ Euro 2012 ■ Polish hospitality ■ Special Economic Zones ■ Polish export and design L’Arc ~ Varsovie French restaurant in the heart of Warsaw. The cuisine is led by our Chef Marcin Legat who delight in serving you delicious contemporary and French cuisine. We serve daily breakfast, lunch and dinner which are prepared by our talented Chef reklama Larcand his team using only the best and freshest ingredients. Our trademark is our Aquarium from where we serve delicious fresh lobsters and different kind of oysters on a daily basis. Live piano on wednesday and saturdays between 19:00 ‒ 22:00. We serve Champagne Moet per glass and bottle with the best price in Poland! Restauracja L’ARC Varsovie ul. Puławska 16, 02-512 Warszawa tel.: +48 602 822 007 (French/English/Polish) +48 519 000 050 +48 22 465 13 58 fax: 22 465 13 58 e-mail: [email protected] 5 Contents ■ POLISH ECONOMY 6 ▪ Interview with Mr. Waldemar Pawlak, Vice Prime Minister 6 ▪ Polish economy: still catching the wave 8 ▪ Interview with Mr. H.E. Lee Feinstein 16 ▪ Interview with Mr. H.E. Robin Barnett 18 ▪ Interview with Mr. H.E. Rüdiger Freiherr von Fritsch 19 ▪ Interview with Prof. Witold Orłowski 20 ▪ Interview with Mr. Maxime Gourgouillat 24 ■ EURO 2012 26 ▪ Euro 2012 - football and economics 27 ▪ Cooperation Poland & Ukraine 30 ■ CITIES AND REGIONS 34 Publisher & Editor-in-chief ▪ Cities and Regions 35 Milena Golda ▪ Interview with Mr. Adam Jarubas 40 Executive Editor ▪ Interview with Mr. Leszek Wojtasiak 42 Grzegorz Morawski ▪ Interview with Mr.
[Show full text]
Tobacco Industry Interference with Tobacco Control Policies in Poland
TC Online First, published on September 28, 2015 as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052582 Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052582 on 28 September 2015. Downloaded from Research paper Tobacco industry interference with tobacco control policies in Poland: legal aspects and industry practices Łukasz Balwicki,1 Michał Stokłosa,2 Małgorzata Balwicka-Szczyrba,3 Wioleta Tomczak4 ▸ Additional material is ABSTRACT has had only moderate success in implementing its published online only. To view Background Since 2006, when Poland ratiﬁed the WHO provisions. Poland’s tobacco control law underwent please visit the journal online Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), there revision in 2010 and 2011 to extend smoke-free (http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ 5 tobaccocontrol-2015-052582). have been efforts to improve tobacco control regulation in areas and improve point-of-purchase regulation; the country. At the same time, at the European Union however, the scope of the revision has been greatly 1Department of Public Health and Social Medicine, Medical level, Poland took part in discussions over revision of the reduced during the legislative process. Despite rati- University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Tobacco Tax Directive and the Tobacco Products Directive. fying the WHO FCTC, many tobacco control regu- Poland This study aims to explore the tobacco industry’s tactics to lations still do not meet its requirements. For 2 Economic and Health Policy interfere with the creation of those policies. example, Poland still has partial smoke-free laws6 Research, American Cancer Methods Analysis of 257 documents obtained through and incomplete advertisement, promotion7 and Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA 8 3Department of Civil Law, freedom of information request.
[Show full text]
Poland's Post Election Foreign Policy
Poland’s post election foreign policy – a turning point? Krzysztof Bobiñski Poland’s autumn election followed the Poland. The election was fought on the collapse of the coalition between the government’s record in combating corruption majority Law and Justice Party (PiS) and and saw a big mobilisation of voters on the Samoobrona Party and the League of both sides of the political spectrum Polish Families (LPR) two years before the around this issue. High economic growth end of the parliament’s four year term. and declining unemployment during its The resignation of the government came entire term helped to buoy PiS’s support in the wake of accusations and counter in the election. Ultimately, however, the accusations between the coalition partners contest1 was decided by an unprecedented of corruption and unconstitutional turnout of young people who voted to behaviour. The short election campaign reject the government’s traditionalist saw, in essence, a continuation of little domestic policies and inherent suspicion more than the robust polemics between of the outside world. PiS and the Civic Platform (PO), the main opposition party during the government’s The result of the election saw PO win the two years in office. The PiS-led greatest number of seats in the Sejm and government’s foreign policy played Senate, the two parliamentary chambers. a small part in the campaign and what Subsequently it established a governing debate there was between the main coalition with the Polish People’s Party contenders failed to reflect the electorate’s (PSL). The government brought in a new concerns on Poland’s continued involvement foreign minister, Rados³aw Sikorski, to in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as plans to replace Anna Fotyga, who is likely to move site a US missile defence base in northern to the President’s office.
[Show full text]
In Pursuit of Liberalism Epstein, Rachel A
In Pursuit of Liberalism Epstein, Rachel A. Published by Johns Hopkins University Press Epstein, Rachel A. In Pursuit of Liberalism: International Institutions in Postcommunist Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008. Project MUSE. doi:10.1353/book.3346. https://muse.jhu.edu/. For additional information about this book https://muse.jhu.edu/book/3346 [ Access provided at 30 Sep 2021 14:57 GMT with no institutional affiliation ] This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... In Pursuit of Liberalism . ................................................................................................................................ ........................................................................................................................................................... This page intentionally left blank ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... In Pursuit of Liberalism . International Institutions in Postcommunist Europe . rachel a. epstein . The Johns Hopkins University
[Show full text]
Chairperson's Statement United Nations Conference on Anti-Corruption Measures, Good Governance & Human Rights
Chairperson’s Statement United Nations Conference on Anti-Corruption Measures, Good Governance & Human Rights Warsaw, Republic of Poland, 8-9 November 2006 Introduction The United Nations Conference on Anti-Corruption Measures, Good Governance and Human Rights was convened in Warsaw, Republic of Poland, from 8-9 November 2006. It was organized by the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in cooperation with the Government of the Republic of Poland. The Conference had a practical orientation and was structured in a manner that could lead to the discussion of practical and concrete recommendations. There were more than 240 participants from more than 100 countries, including anti-corruption and human rights experts, governments’ representatives, public officials, civil society and private sector actors involved in leading national anti- corruption efforts. The Chairman of the Conference was H.E. Anna Fotyga, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Poland. The Conference was organized in response to the United Nations Commission on Human Rights Resolution 2005/68, which requested the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights “[...] to convene a seminar in 2006 [...] on the role of anti- corruption measures at the national and international levels in good governance practices for the promotion and protection of human rights.” The Conference was a follow-up to the joint OHCHR-UNDP Seminar on good governance practices for the promotion and protection of human rights, which took place in Seoul in September 2004. The conclusions of that Seminar emphasized the mutually reinforcing, and sometimes overlapping, relationship between good governance and human rights.
[Show full text]
Poland 2005 Hit Summary
European Health Systems in Transition Observatory on Health Systems and Policies HiT Summary Poland Fig. Average life expectancy at birth in Poland compared with selected countries and regional averages, 970–2003 80 75 70 65 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 Czech Republic Germany Hungary Lithuania Poland EU average EU average for Member States joining 1 May 2004 Source: European Health for All database, June 2005. Note: EU: European Union. Overview development of a positive attitude in the society towards the health system and health reforms. After the introduction of health reforms initiated in 1989, the new Law on Health Care Services Health expenditure and GDP Financed from Public Sources (2004) further In 2002, total expenditure on health in Poland as a reformed the current law in areas defining: the percentage of GDP reached 6.1%: 2.6 percentage responsibilities of the Ministry of Health, the points lower than the average of 8.7% for governance of the National Health Fund and countries belonging to the EU prior to May 2004, health planning. While significant achievements, European Observatory such as greater longevity, shorter hospitalization on Health Systems and Policies stays, improved primary health care, and a WHO Regional Office for Europe greater focus on health prevention and promotion, Scherfigsvej 8 DK-200 Copenhagen have been accomplished, numerous challenges, Denmark such as unfavourable demographic trends, an Telephone: +45 39 7 7 7 Fax: +45 39 7 8 8 underfunding of the public health system and E-mail: [email protected] limited access to care, continue to hinder the www.euro.who.int/observatory HiT summary: Poland, 2005 and 0.5 percentage points below the average of in negative natural population growth as in new EU Member States.
[Show full text]
LPR Government Coalition, May 2006, and the Expectations from the Pis - Self-Defence - LPR Coalition, June 2006
CBOS MAY 2006 ISSN 1233 - 7250 THE POLES ABOUT THE PIS - SELF-DEFENCE - LPR IN THIS ISSUE: GOVERNMENT COALITION R THE POLES ABOUT After six months of a minority THE PIS - SELF-DEFENCE cabinet formed by the Law and Justice WHAT IS YOUR OPINION ABOUT THE PIS - SELF- DEFENCE - LPR COALITION? - LPR GOVERNMENT (PiS), a majority coalition with the Self- COALITION It is too early to evaluate this Defence and the League of Polish Families coalition, let us wait for the (LPR) was formed. The Self-Defence and effects of its work the LPR are often seen as populist and R THE ATTITUDE nationalist parties. The reactions of the TO THE GOVERNMENT 47% public opinion, although less extreme than This coalition can do AFTER ITS 6% a lot of good RECONSTRUCTION those prevailing in Polish and foreign media, are not favourable. The new 13% coalition has been received by the Poles 34% Difficult to say R THE IMPORTANCE without much hope. Only 12% of the OF RELIGION respondents were glad that it was formed, One cannot expect anything good from whereas more than three times as many the PiS - Self-Defence -LPR coalition (36%) were worried. However, the most R PSYCHOLOGICAL common reaction to forming the new STRESS IN GEORGIA, The PiS - Self-Defence - LPR coalition government coalition was indifference (43%). THE UKRAINE, government will manage to carry out reforms HUNGARY AND POLAND and speed up the country's development The prevailing opinion is that people should wait with the evaluation of the new coalition 21% until they see some effects of its work.
[Show full text]
European Financial Congress Agenda 2020 OCTOBER 12 2020 – MONDAY 11.20 - 12.20 OPENING of the 10TH EUROPEAN FINANCIAL CONGRESS
European Financial Congress Agenda 2020 OCTOBER 12 2020 – MONDAY 11.20 - 12.20 OPENING OF THE 10TH EUROPEAN FINANCIAL CONGRESS Jan Krzysztof Bielecki, Chair of the EFC Program Board Jacek Karnowski, President of Sopot Opening addresses: Tadeusz Kościński, Polish Minister of Finance Paweł Borys, President of the Management Board, Polish Development Fund Keynote lecture: The Future Outlook for Inflation Charles Goodhart, Emeritus Professor of Banking and Finance with the Financial Markets Group at the London School of Economics 12.20 - 13.40 Oxford-style debate on the thesis: Fiscal Rules Are Unnecessary Prowadzenie: Jan Krzysztof Bielecki, Chair of the EFC Program Board Opponents team: - Jerzy Hausner, Professor at the Cracow University of Economics - Sławomir Dudek, Chief Economist, Employers of Poland - Janusz Jankowiak, Chief Economist, Polish Business Roundtable - Andrzej Rzońca, Professor at the Warsaw School of Economics Proponents team: - Michał Możdżeń, Assistant Professor at the Cracow University of Economics - Maciej Grodzicki, Assistant Professor at the Jagiellonian University in Cracow - Zofia Łapniewska, Assistant Professor at the Jagiellonian University in Cracow - Jan J. Zygmuntowski, Lecturer at Kozminski University 13.40 - 14.45 Lunch break 14.45 - 15.00 Economic Scenarios for Poland Fireside chat: - Tadeusz Kościński, Polish Minister of Finance Moderator: - Wojciech Surmacz, President of the Board, Polish Press Agency 15.00 - 17.00 Session on Economic Scenarios for Europe Hosts: - Ludwik Kotecki, Director, Institute of
[Show full text]