Méditerranée

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Méditerranée APERÇU DU STATUT DE CONSERVATION DES POISSONS MARINS PRÉSENTS EN MER MÉDITERRANÉE Rapport élaboré par Dania Abdul Malak, Suzanne R. Livingstone, David Pollard, Beth A. Polidoro, Annabelle Cuttelod, Michel Bariche, Murat Bilecenoglu, Kent E. Carpenter, Bruce B. Collette, Patrice Francour, Menachem Goren, Mohamed Hichem Kara, Enric Massutí, Costas Papaconstantinou et Leonardo Tunesi MÉDITERRANÉE Liste Rouge de l’UICN des espèces menacées™ – Évaluation régionale APERÇU DU STATUT DE CONSERVATION DES POISSONS MARINS PRÉSENTS EN MER MÉDITERRANÉE Rapport élaboré par Dania Abdul Malak, Suzanne R. Livingstone, David Pollard, Beth A. Polidoro, Annabelle Cuttelod, Michel Bariche, Murat Bilecenoglu, Kent E. Carpenter, Bruce B. Collette, Patrice Francour, Menachem Goren, Mohamed Hichem Kara, Enric Massutí, Costas Papaconstantinou et Leonardo Tunesi Liste Rouge de l’UICN des espèces menacées™ – Évaluation régionale Élaboré par : Dania Abdul Malak Programme sur les espèces méditerranéennes, Centre de Coopération pour la Méditerranée de l’UICN, calle Marie Curie 22, 29590 Campanillas (Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía (technopole)), Malaga, Espagne Suzanne R. Livingstone Évaluation mondiale des espèces marines, Unité de Biodiversité marine, Programme des Espèces de l’UICN, c/o Conservation In- ternational Arlington, VA 22202, Etats-Unis David Pollard Écologie appliquée à la conservation marine, 7/86 Darling Street, Balmain East, New South Wales 2041, Australie ; Associé de re- cherche, Département d’Ichtyologie, Musée australien, Sydney, Australie Beth A. Polidoro Évaluation mondiale des espèces marines, Unité de Biodiversité marine, Programme des Espèces de l’UICN, Université d’Old Dominion, Norfolk, VA 23529, Etats-Unis Annabelle Cuttelod Unité de la Liste Rouge, Programme des Espèces de l’UICN, 219c Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL, Royaume-Uni Michel Bariche Département de Biologie, Université américaine de Beyrouth, Beyrouth, Liban Murat Bilecenoglu Département de Biologie, Faculté des arts et des sciences de l’Université Adnan Menderes, 09010 Aydin, Turquie Kent E. Carpenter Évaluation mondiale des espèces marines, Unité de Biodiversité marine, Programme des Espèces de l’UICN, Université d’Old Dominion, Norfolk, VA 23529, Etats-Unis Bruce B. Collette Laboratoire de Systématique et du Service national de pêche marine, Musée national d’histoire naturelle, Institution Smithsonian, Washington, DC 20560, Etats-Unis Patrice Francour Écologie des écosystèmes marins côtiers et réponses au stress, Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis, Faculté des sciences, Parc Va- lrose, 06108 Nice Cedex 02, France Menachem Goren Département de Zoologie, Université de Tel-Aviv 69778, Israël Mohamed Hichem Kara Laboratoire des Bioressources marines, Université d’Annaba, BP 230 Oued Kouba, Annaba 23003, Algérie Enric Masuttí I.E.O. (Institut espagnol d’océanographie) - Centre océanographique des îles Baléares, P.O. Box 291, 07080 Palma, Espagne Costas Papaconstantinou Institut des ressources biologiques marines, Centre hellénique de recherche marine, 46,7 km Athènes-Sounion av., P.O Box 712, 19013 Anavissos Attica, Grèce Leonardo Tunesi ISPRA - Institut supérieur pour la protection et la recherche scientifique pour l’environnement, Via di Casalotti, 300, I-00166 Rome, Italie La terminologie géographique employée dans cet ouvrage, de même que sa présentation, ne sont en aucune manière l’expression d’une opinion quelconque de la part de l’UICN, de la Fondation Turque pour la Recherche Marine (TUDAV) ou de leurs partenaires sur le statut juridique ou l’autorité de quelque pays, territoire ou région que ce soit, ou sur la délimitation de ses frontières. Les opinions exprimées dans cette publication ne reflètent pas nécessairement celles de l’UICN ou de tout autre organisme participant. L’UICN et les autres organisations concernées rejettent toute responsabilité en cas d’erreurs ou d’omissions intervenues lors de la traduction en français de ce document dont la version originale est en anglais. Publié par : UICN, Gland, Suisse et Malaga, Espagne Droits d’auteur : © 2012 Union internationale pour la conservation de la nature et de ses ressources La reproduction de cette publication à des fins non commerciales, notamment éducatives, est permise sans autorisation écrite préalable du détenteur des droits d’auteur à condition que la source soit dûment citée. La reproduction de cette publication à des fins commerciales, notamment en vue de la vente, est interdite sans autorisation écrite préalable du détenteur des droits d’auteur. Logo de la Liste Rouge : © 2008 Citation: Abdul Malak, D. et al. (2011). Aperçu du statut de conservation des poissons marins présents en mer Méditerranée. Gland, Suisse et Málaga, Espagne : UICN. vii + 61pp. Numéro ISBN : 978-2-8317-1433-2 Traduction: Isabel Moyano Ramos et Alexandra Salmon-Lefranc Dépôt légal : MA - 356 - 2011 (version anglaise) Photographie de couverture : Le Thon rouge de l’Atlantique Thunnus thynnus, figure dans la Catégorie En danger au niveau méditerranéen © Tahsin Ceylan Toutes les photographies publiées dans le présent rapport demeurent la propriété du titulaire original des droits d’auteur (pour de plus amples informations, se reporter aux légendes figurant sous chaque photographie). Il est interdit de reproduire ou d’utiliser ces photographies dans d’autres contextes sans l’autorisation écrite du détenteur des droits d’auteur. Mise en page : Chadi Abi Faraj, Centre de Coopération pour la Méditerranée de l’UICN Production : Centre de Coopération pour la Méditerranée de l’UICN Disponible auprès du : Centre de Coopération pour la Méditerranée de l’UICN C. / Marie Curie 22 29590 Campanillas, Malaga, Espagne. Tél. : +34 952 028430 - Fax : +34 952 028145 www.uicn.org/mediterranee Aussi disponible auprès de www.iucn.org/publications Table des matières Remerciements ........................................................................................................................................................ v Résumé .................................................................................................................................................... vi 1. Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 La mer Méditerranée ................................................................................................................... ................2 1.2 Les poissons de la mer Méditerranée ............................................................................................................3 1.3 Objectifs de l’évaluation régionale ................................................................................................................5 2. Méthodologie de l’évaluation ......................................................................................................................6 2.1 Liste Rouge de l’UICN des espèces menacées ...............................................................................................6 2.2 Initiative des évaluations des espèces marines pour la Liste Rouge de l’UICN ..............................................7 2.2.1 Évaluation mondiale des espèces marines ............................................................................................7 2.2.2 Évaluation régionale en Méditerranée .................................................................................................8 2.3 Processus de catégorisation dans la Liste Rouge de l’UICN ..........................................................................8 2.3.1 Portée taxonomique ............................................................................................................................8 2.3.2 Portée géographique ...........................................................................................................................9 2.3.3 Évaluations régionale et mondiale .......................................................................................................9 2.3.4 Collecte, évaluation et révision des données ......................................................................................10 3. Résultats et discussion ....................................................................................................................................11 3.1 Ensemble des poissons marins autochtones ................................................................................................11 3.1.1 État des menaces ...............................................................................................................................11 3.1.2 Statut par principaux groupes taxonomiques .....................................................................................13 3.1.3 Répartition géographique .................................................................................................................14 3.2 Requins, raies et chimères ..........................................................................................................................16 3.2.1 Requins, raies et chimères menacés ...................................................................................................19 3.2.2 Requins, raies et chimères Quasi menacés .........................................................................................20 3.2.3 Requins, raies et chimères figurant dans les Catégories Préoccupation mineure et Données insuffisantes .......................................................................................................................20
Recommended publications
  • Mediterranean Marine Science
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by National Documentation Centre - EKT journals Mediterranean Marine Science Vol. 20, 2019 Twelve new records of gobies and clingfishes (Pisces: Teleostei) significantly increase small benthic fish diversity of Maltese waters KOVAČIĆ MARCELO Natural History Museum Rijeka SCHEMBRI PATRICK University of Malta https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.19816 Copyright © 2019 Mediterranean Marine Science To cite this article: KOVAČIĆ, M., & SCHEMBRI, P. (2019). Twelve new records of gobies and clingfishes (Pisces: Teleostei) significantly increase small benthic fish diversity of Maltese waters. Mediterranean Marine Science, 20(2), 287-296. doi:https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.19816 http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 23/03/2020 08:31:30 | Research Article Mediterranean Marine Science Indexed in WoS (Web of Science, ISI Thomson) and SCOPUS The journal is available on line at http://www.medit-mar-sc.net DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/mms.19816 Twelve new records of gobies and clingfishes (Pisces: Teleostei) significantly increase small benthic fish diversity of Maltese waters Marcelo KOVAČIĆ¹ and Patrick J. SCHEMBRI² ¹Natural History Museum Rijeka, Lorenzov prolaz 1, HR-51000 Rijeka ²Department of Biology, University of Malta, Msida MSD2080, Malta Corresponding author: [email protected] Handling Editor: Argyro ZENETOS Received: 25 February 2019; Accepted: 23 March 2019; Published on line: 28 May 2019 Abstract Twelve new first records of species from two families are added to the list of known marine fishes from Malta based on labo- ratory study of material collected during fieldwork over a period of more than twenty years.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of the Clingfish Apletodon Dentatus (Gobiesocidae) in The
    Bulletin of Fish Biology Volume 13 Nos. 1/2 30.11.2011 65-69 Short note/Kurze Mitteilung First record of the clingfi sh Apletodon dentatus (Gobiesocidae) in the Adriatic Sea and a description of a simple method to collect clingfi shes Erster Nachweis des Schildfi sches Apletodon dentatus (Gobiesocidae) in der Adria und eine Beschreibung einer simplen Fangmethode für Schildfi sche Simon Brandl1, Maximilian Wagner1, Robert Hofrichter2 & Robert A. Patzner2 1University of Innsbruck, Technikerstr. 15, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; [email protected]; 2University of Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstr. 34, 5020 Salzburg, Austria. Zusammenfassung: Zwei Exemplare der Schildfi schart Apletodon dentatus (Facciola, 1887) wurden in der Bucht von Sv. Petar auf der Insel Krk (nördliche Adria, Kroatien) gefangen. Dies ist der erste Nachweis dieser Art in der Adria. Eine einfache und effektive Methode Schildfi sche zu fangen, besteht darin, Teller umgekehrt auf das Substrat zu legen.Diese werden von den Schildfi schen als Höhle angenommen. Clingfi shes (Gobiesocidae) are small crypto- with common methods like nets and baited benthic fi shes, characterized by a scaleless and traps, a simple but effective collecting method fl attened body, an adhesive sucking disc at the was developed. ventral body surface and the absence of a swim To examine the occurrence of clingfish bladder. There are currently eight species known species, the bay Sv. Petar at the island of Krk, in the Mediterranean Sea: Apletodon dentatus Croatia, (fi g. 1) was chosen as it provides many (Facciola, 1887), Apletodon incognitus (Hofrichter different habitats, including a sandy bottom, a & Patzner, 1997), Diplecogaster bimaculata (Bon- sea grass meadow (Cymodocea nodosa), a rocky naterre, 1788), Gouania wildenowi (Risso, 1810), slope with different kinds of brown algae and a Lepadogaster candollei (Risso, 1810), Lepadogaster rocky ground with pebbles and stones.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Influencing Habitat Selection of Three Cryptobenthic Clingfish
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Factors Influencing Habitat Selection of Three Cryptobenthic Clingfish Species in the Shallow North Adriatic Sea Domen Trkov 1,2,* , Danijel Ivajnšiˇc 3,4 , Marcelo Kovaˇci´c 5 and Lovrenc Lipej 1,2 1 Marine Biology Station Piran, National Institute of Biology, Fornaˇce41, 6330 Piran, Slovenia; [email protected] 2 Jožef Stefan Institute and Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School, Jamova Cesta 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia 3 Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Maribor, Koroška Cesta 160, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia; [email protected] 4 Faculty of Arts, University of Maribor, Koroška Cesta 160, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia 5 Natural History Museum Rijeka, Lorenzov Prolaz 1, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Cryptobenthic fishes were often overlooked in the past due to their cryptic lifestyle, so knowledge of their ecology is still incomplete. One of the most poorly studied taxa of fishes in the Mediterranean Sea is clingfish. In this paper we examine the habitat preferences of three clingfish species (Lepadogaster lepadogaster, L. candolii, and Apletodon incognitus) occurring in the Gulf of Trieste (Northern Adriatic). The results show that all three species have a cryptic lifestyle and are well- segregated based on their depth distribution and macro- and microhabitat preferences. L. lepadogaster inhabits shallow waters of the lower mediolittoral and upper infralittoral, where it occurs on rocky bottoms under stones. L. candolii similarly occurs in the rocky infralittoral under stones, but below the Citation: Trkov, D.; Ivajnšiˇc,D.; lower distribution limit of L. lepadogaster, and in seagrass meadows, where it occupies empty seashells.
    [Show full text]
  • Mediterranean Marine Science
    Mediterranean Marine Science Vol. 20, 2019 Twelve new records of gobies and clingfishes (Pisces: Teleostei) significantly increase small benthic fish diversity of Maltese waters KOVAČIĆ MARCELO Natural History Museum Rijeka SCHEMBRI PATRICK University of Malta http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/mms.19816 Copyright © 2019 Mediterranean Marine Science To cite this article: KOVAČIĆ, M., & SCHEMBRI, P. (2019). Twelve new records of gobies and clingfishes (Pisces: Teleostei) significantly increase small benthic fish diversity of Maltese waters. Mediterranean Marine Science, 20(2), 287-296. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/mms.19816 http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 09/09/2019 20:56:43 | Research Article Mediterranean Marine Science Indexed in WoS (Web of Science, ISI Thomson) and SCOPUS The journal is available on line at http://www.medit-mar-sc.net DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/mms.19816 Twelve new records of gobies and clingfishes (Pisces: Teleostei) significantly increase small benthic fish diversity of Maltese waters Marcelo KOVAČIĆ¹ and Patrick J. SCHEMBRI² ¹Natural History Museum Rijeka, Lorenzov prolaz 1, HR-51000 Rijeka ²Department of Biology, University of Malta, Msida MSD2080, Malta Corresponding author: [email protected] Handling Editor: Argyro ZENETOS Received: 25 February 2019; Accepted: 23 March 2019; Published on line: 28 May 2019 Abstract Twelve new first records of species from two families are added to the list of known marine fishes from Malta based on labo- ratory study of material collected during fieldwork over a period of more than twenty years. The three new records of clingfishes (Apletodon incognitus, Gouania wildenowi, Opeatogenys gracilis) double the known diversity of Gobiesocidae for the area; the nine new records of gobies (Chromogobius zebratus, Gobius ater, Gobius fallax, Gobius gasteveni, Gobius roulei, Lebetus guilleti, Odondebuenia balearica, Speleogobius llorisi, Vanneaugobius dollfusi) increase by almost a half the known diversity of Maltese Gobiidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Marine Fishes from Metropolitan France
    Checklist of the marine fishes from metropolitan France by Philippe BÉAREZ* (1, 8), Patrice PRUVOST (2), Éric FEUNTEUN (2, 3, 8), Samuel IGLÉSIAS (2, 4, 8), Patrice FRANCOUR (5), Romain CAUSSE (2, 8), Jeanne DE MAZIERES (6), Sandrine TERCERIE (6) & Nicolas BAILLY (7, 8) Abstract. – A list of the marine fish species occurring in the French EEZ was assembled from more than 200 references. No updated list has been published since the 19th century, although incomplete versions were avail- able in several biodiversity information systems. The list contains 729 species distributed in 185 families. It is a preliminary step for the Atlas of Marine Fishes of France that will be further elaborated within the INPN (the National Inventory of the Natural Heritage: https://inpn.mnhn.fr). Résumé. – Liste des poissons marins de France métropolitaine. Une liste des poissons marins se trouvant dans la Zone Économique Exclusive de France a été constituée à partir de plus de 200 références. Cette liste n’avait pas été mise à jour formellement depuis la fin du 19e siècle, © SFI bien que des versions incomplètes existent dans plusieurs systèmes d’information sur la biodiversité. La liste Received: 4 Jul. 2017 Accepted: 21 Nov. 2017 contient 729 espèces réparties dans 185 familles. C’est une étape préliminaire pour l’Atlas des Poissons marins Editor: G. Duhamel de France qui sera élaboré dans le cadre de l’INPN (Inventaire National du Patrimoine Naturel : https://inpn. mnhn.fr). Key words Marine fishes No recent faunistic work cov- (e.g. Quéro et al., 2003; Louisy, 2015), in which the entire Northeast Atlantic ers the fish species present only in Europe is considered (Atlantic only for the former).
    [Show full text]
  • Apletodon Gabonensis, a New Species of Clingfish (Teleostei: Gobiesocidae) from Gabon, Eastern Atlantic Ocean
    Arquipelago - Life and Marine Sciences ISSN: 0873-4704 Apletodon gabonensis, a new species of clingfish (Teleostei: Gobiesocidae) from Gabon, eastern Atlantic Ocean RONALD FRICKE AND PETER WIRTZ Fricke, R. and P. Wirtz 2018. Apletodon gabonensis, a new species of clingfish (Teleostei: Gobiesocidae) from Gabon, eastern Atlantic Ocean. Arquipelago. Life and Marine Sciences 36: 1 - 8. https://doi.org/10.25752/arq.19847 The clingfish Apletodon gabonensis sp. nov. is described on the basis of seven specimens and colour photographs from Gabon, eastern Atlantic Ocean. The species is small, apparently not exceeding 20 mm total length; it is characterized by having 5 dorsal-fin rays, 4-5 anal-fin rays, 25-27 pectoral-fin rays, head width in males 2.6-4.7 in SL, anus in males with urogenital papilla present but not pronounced; snout long, broad, anteriorly truncate in male, narrower and rather pointed in female; preorbital length 1.8-3.8 in head length; conspicuous maxillary barbel absent in both sexes; disc with 10-12 rows of papillae in region A, 5 rows of papillae in region B, and 5-7 rows of papillae in region C. The new species is compared with the other species of the genus; a key to the males of the 6 known species of the eastern Atlantic genus Apletodon is presented. Key words: clingfishes, systematics, Gabon, distribution, identification key. Ronald Fricke (e-mail: [email protected]), Im Ramstal 76, 97922 Lauda-Königshofen, Germany. PeterWirtz (e.mail: [email protected]), Centro de Ciências do Mar, Universidade do Algarve, PT-8005-139 Faro, Portugal.
    [Show full text]
  • Mediterranean Sea
    OVERVIEW OF THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF THE MARINE FISHES OF THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA Compiled by Dania Abdul Malak, Suzanne R. Livingstone, David Pollard, Beth A. Polidoro, Annabelle Cuttelod, Michel Bariche, Murat Bilecenoglu, Kent E. Carpenter, Bruce B. Collette, Patrice Francour, Menachem Goren, Mohamed Hichem Kara, Enric Massutí, Costas Papaconstantinou and Leonardo Tunesi MEDITERRANEAN The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ – Regional Assessment OVERVIEW OF THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF THE MARINE FISHES OF THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA Compiled by Dania Abdul Malak, Suzanne R. Livingstone, David Pollard, Beth A. Polidoro, Annabelle Cuttelod, Michel Bariche, Murat Bilecenoglu, Kent E. Carpenter, Bruce B. Collette, Patrice Francour, Menachem Goren, Mohamed Hichem Kara, Enric Massutí, Costas Papaconstantinou and Leonardo Tunesi The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ – Regional Assessment Compilers: Dania Abdul Malak Mediterranean Species Programme, IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation, calle Marie Curie 22, 29590 Campanillas (Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía), Málaga, Spain Suzanne R. Livingstone Global Marine Species Assessment, Marine Biodiversity Unit, IUCN Species Programme, c/o Conservation International, Arlington, VA 22202, USA David Pollard Applied Marine Conservation Ecology, 7/86 Darling Street, Balmain East, New South Wales 2041, Australia; Research Associate, Department of Ichthyology, Australian Museum, Sydney, Australia Beth A. Polidoro Global Marine Species Assessment, Marine Biodiversity Unit, IUCN Species Programme, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA Annabelle Cuttelod Red List Unit, IUCN Species Programme, 219c Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL,UK Michel Bariche Biology Departement, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon Murat Bilecenoglu Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Adnan Menderes University, 09010 Aydin, Turkey Kent E. Carpenter Global Marine Species Assessment, Marine Biodiversity Unit, IUCN Species Programme, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA Bruce B.
    [Show full text]
  • KING-THESIS-2017.Pdf (2.949Mb)
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC INVESTIGATION OF THE CLINGFISHES (TELEOSTEI: GOBIESOCIDAE) A Thesis by CRAGEN DANIELLE KING Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Chair of Committee, Kevin W. Conway Committee Members, Gary Voelker David Portnoy Interdisciplinary Faculty Chair, Duncan MacKenzie December 2017 Major Subject: Marine Biology Copyright 2017 Cragen Danielle King ABSTRACT Currently, there are roughly 170 species of clingfishes (family Gobiesocidae) divided between ten subfamilies in a “phenetic” classification scheme proposed over 60 years ago. Recently, an alternative classification scheme was proposed which included only two subfamilies. For this study, a large scale multi-locus investigation on the phylogenetic relationships of the Gobiesocidae was conducted using both mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequence data to assess whether the two available classification schemes reflect the evolutionary relationships of the group. Phylogenetic hypotheses are obtained from Bayesian and Maximum Likelihood analyses of two mitochondrial (12S and COI; 1062 bp) and five nuclear genes (ENC1, GLYT, MYH6, SH3PX3, and ZIC1; 3785 bp) for 81 species of clingfishes. Four of the ten subfamilies (Aspasminae, Diademichthyinae, Diplocrepinae, and Gobiesocinae) and four genera (Aspasmichthys, Cochleoceps, Lepadichthys, and Lepadogaster) are obtained as not monophyletic. The resulting topologies also do not recover the two-subfamily classification scheme as useful for classifying clingfishes because subfamily Cheilobranchinae is obtained as a monophyletic group that is deeply embedded inside the second subfamily Gobiesocinae. The two available classification schemes and their included subfamilies are discussed in detail. ii DEDICATION I dedicate this thesis to my grandparents, parents, siblings, and to the Smiths for all of their love and support.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article
    NESciences, 2018, 3(3): 333-358 doi: 10.28978/nesciences.468995 - REVIEW ARTICLE - A Checklist of the Non-indigenous Fishes in Turkish Marine Waters Cemal Turan1*, Mevlüt Gürlek1, Nuri Başusta2, Ali Uyan1, Servet A. Doğdu1, Serpil Karan1 1Molecular Ecology and Fisheries Genetics Laboratory, Marine Science Department, Faculty of Marine Science and Technology, Iskenderun Technical University, 31220 Iskenderun, Hatay, Turkey 2Fisheries Faculty, Firat University, 23119 Elazig, Turkey Abstract A checklist of non-indigenous marine fishes including bony, cartilaginous and jawless distributed along the Turkish Marine Waters was for the first time generated in the present study. The number of records of non-indigenous fish species found in Turkish marine waters were 101 of which 89 bony, 11 cartilaginous and 1 jawless. In terms of occurrence of non-indigenous fish species in the surrounding Turkish marine waters, the Mediterranean coast has the highest diversity (92 species), followed by the Aegean Sea (50 species), the Marmara Sea (11 species) and the Black Sea (2 species). The Indo-Pacific origin of the non-indigenous fish species is represented with 73 species while the Atlantic origin of the non-indigenous species is represented with 22 species. Only first occurrence of a species in the Mediterranean, Aegean, Marmara and Black Sea Coasts of Turkey is given with its literature in the list. Keywords: Checklist, non-indigenous fishes, Turkish Marien Waters Article history: Received 14 August 2018, Accepted 08 October 2018, Available online 10 October 2018 Introduction Fishes are the most primitive members of the subphylum Craniata, constituting more than half of the living vertebrate species. There is a relatively rich biota in the Mediterranean Sea although it covers less than 1% of the global ocean surface.
    [Show full text]
  • An Updated Checklist of the Marine Fishes of Turkey
    Turkish Journal of Zoology Turk J Zool (2014) 38: 901-929 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/ © TÜBİTAK Review Article doi:10.3906/zoo-1405-60 An updated checklist of the marine fishes of Turkey 1, 2 3 4 Murat BİLECENOĞLU *, Murat KAYA , Bülent CİHANGİR , Erdoğan ÇİÇEK 1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey 2 Department of Hydrobiology, Faculty of Fisheries, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey 3 Institute of Marine Sciences and Technology, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey 4 Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University, Nevşehir, Turkey Received: 27.05.2014 Accepted: 13.08.2014 Published Online: 10.11.2014 Printed: 28.11.2014 Abstract: The current status of marine fishes distributed along the Turkish coasts is reviewed and an updated checklist including 512 species is presented. In this study, 5 species are recorded for the first time from Turkey (Lepidion lepidion (Risso, 1810); Bathophilus nigerrimus Giglioli, 1882; Gonostoma denudatum Rafinesque, 1810; Solea aegyptiaca Chabanaud, 1927; and Gobius roulei de Buen, 1928), while 7 species are new to the Turkish Aegean Sea coast (Notacanthus bonaparte Risso, 1840; Nettastoma melanurum Rafinesque, 1810; Apletodon dentatus (Facciolà, 1887); Apletodon incognitus Hofrichter & Patzner, 1997; Callionymus filamentosus Valenciennes, 1837; Cynoglossus sinusarabici (Chabanaud, 1931); Torquigener flavimaculosus Hardy & Randall, 1983) and 3 species are newly reported from the Levantine coast (Dysomma brevirostre (Facciolà, 1887); Apletodon dentatus (Facciolà, 1887); Zebrus zebrus (Risso, 1827)). Key words: Marine fish diversity, Black Sea, Sea of Marmara, Aegean Sea, Levantine Sea 1. Introduction seems to be more related to the scarcity of taxonomical Fishes are the most primitive members of the subphylum studies, rather than the oligotrophic nature of the eastern Craniata, constituting more than half of the living Mediterranean basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplecogaster Tonstricula, a New Species of Cleaning Clingfish
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL HISTORY, 2016 VOL. 50, NOS. 11–12, 731–748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2015.1079659 Diplecogaster tonstricula, a new species of cleaning clingfish (Teleostei: Gobiesocidae) from the Canary Islands and Senegal, eastern Atlantic Ocean, with a review of the Diplecogaster-ctenocrypta species-group Ronald Frickea,b, Peter Wirtzc and Alberto Britod aLauda-Königshofen, Germany; bZoology, Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde in Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany; cCentro de Ciências do Mar, Universidade do Algarve, Faro, Portugal; dBIOECOMAC, UD de Ciencias Marinas, Sección de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de La Laguna, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY The Diplecogaster-ctenocrypta species-group is reviewed; it comprises Received 2 May 2015 two species. The clingfish Diplecogaster ctenocrypta from the Canary Accepted 31 July 2015 Islands is redescribed. The new species Diplecogaster tonstricula,a Online 18 September 2015 facultative cleaner of other teleosts, is described on the basis of eight KEYWORDS specimens and colour photos from Senegal and the Canary Islands, Fishes; clingfishes; eastern Atlantic Ocean. The species is small, apparently not exceeding taxonomy; morphology; 23 mm total length; it is characterised by having nine dorsal-finrays, identification key; eight anal-finrays,24–25 pectoral-finrays,14–15 principal caudal-fin facultative cleaner rays, 13–16 rakers on third gill arch, pelvic disc without lateral papillae in region A, disc region B with two rows of weak papillae, interorbital distance 4.1–4.6 in head length, distance between disc and anus 14–17% of SL, head and body with 10–13 narrow vertical brownish bars, cheek with a white ocellus surrounded by black, and with a small black spot in the middle.
    [Show full text]