DOCSLIB.ORG

Social Impact and Recreation in the MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Social Impact and Recreation in the MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 RiverLink Notices of Requirement for Designations and Applications for Resource Consent Volume Four: Supporting Technical Reports Technical Report #17 Social Impact and Recreation IN THE MATTER OF The Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER OF Resource consent applications under section 88, and Notices of Requirement under section 168, of the Act in relation to the RiverLink project BY Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency Requiring Authority Greater Wellington Regional Council Requiring Authority Hutt City Council Requiring Authority RIVERLINK TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT #17 SOCIAL IMPACT AND RECREATION Table of contents 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................1 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 4 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..............................................................................................7 4. STATUTORY AND POLICY CONTEXT ......................................................................... 11 5. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ................................................................................. 16 6. EXISTING ENVIRONMENT........................................................................................... 20 7. CONSULTATION AND FEEDBACK .............................................................................. 27 8. ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS ....................................................................................... 33 9. MEASURES TO AVOID, REMEDY OR MITIGATE ACTUAL OR POTENTIAL ADVERSE SOCIAL AND RECREATION EFFECTS ................................................................ 55 10. CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................. 56 Table index Table 1: The impact scale and definition as applied to the SRIA ........................................................ 20 Table 2: Summary of community consultation and engagement and key themes of feedback ............ 28 Table 3: Social and recreation impacts identified during the Planning Phase of the project ................ 34 Table 4: Construction impacts – fears and aspirations ....................................................................... 35 Table 5: Construction impacts – personal and property rights ............................................................ 36 Table 6: Construction impacts – social and recreation impacts .......................................................... 37 Table 7 Cumulative carpark reduction at the end of each construction stage ..................................... 39 Table 8: Construction impacts – access and connectivity impacts ...................................................... 39 Table 9: Construction impacts – economy, business and employment impacts .................................. 42 Table 10: Construction impacts – amenity and character impacts ...................................................... 44 Table 11: Construction impacts – Environment impacts ..................................................................... 45 Table 12: Operation impacts – fears and aspirations impacts ............................................................ 47 Table 13: Operational impacts – access and connectivity impacts ..................................................... 49 Table 14: Operational impacts – social and recreation impact ............................................................ 50 Table 15: Operational impacts – economy, business and employment impacts.................................. 52 Table 16: Operational impacts – amenity and character impacts ........................................................ 53 Table 17: Operational impacts – personal and property rights impacts ............................................... 54 Table 18: Social and recreation infrastructure that services the Project and Local Study Area ........... 28 i Figure index Figure 1: Wellington and Lower Hutt Regions (Google, 2021) ............................................................ 21 Figure 2: The statistical areas investigated as they sit within the Lower Hutt District .......................... 25 Figure 3: Riverbank market (photos courtesy of GHD) ....................................................................... 27 Figure 4: Maximum flood depth difference resulting from RiverLink works for 2,800 m3/s event (source: River Hydraulics Technical Assessment) ................................................ 47 Appendices Appendix A - Reference List Appendix B - Community profile Appendix C - Demographic Data Appendix D – Social and Recreational Infrastructure Appendix E – Assessment of Effects Table ii 1. INTRODUCTION 1. My name is Michala Lander, of GHD, and I am the primary author responsible for the preparation of this social and recreation impact assessment (SRIA). 1.1 Qualifications and experience 2. I hold a Bachelor of Applied Science (Occupational Therapy) Hons from the University of Sydney and a Master of Planning from the University of New South Wales. I also hold a certificate for Public Participation from the International Association of Public Participation. I am a full member of the Planning Institute of Australia. 3. I have 15 years’ experience as a social planner and I am currently a Technical Director Social Planning within the GHD Planning Team, based in Auckland. 4. My masters dissertation explored the processes used by NSW Local Consent Authorities to assess the social impact of development applications. 5. My experience has included the preparation of social impact assessments as well as social and recreation infrastructure assessments. Examples of projects I have been involved in include: Recreation Needs Analysis for the F6 Extension Stage 1 Project, in Sydney NSW. This report was undertaken as part of the requirement for conditions of consent to mitigate the construction and operational impacts of the proposed extension; Social baseline report to investigate the impacts of the planning proposal for the redevelopment of the Waterloo Housing Estate in Sydney NSW; Social Impact Assessment to support the business case for Stage Two of the Parramatta Light Rail project for Transport for NSW; and Social Impact Assessment to support the application for removal of the Sydney Monorail for Transport for NSW. 6. The report was developed with support from Alex Jepsen, Planning Technical Lead at GHD and a Full Member of the New Zealand Planning Institute. Alex holds a Bachelor of Planning and a Master of Legal Studies (Environmental) from the University of Auckland 1.2 Code of Conduct 7. I confirm that I have read the Code of Conduct for expert witnesses contained in the Environment Court Practice Note 2014. This assessment has been prepared in compliance with that Code, as if it were evidence being given in Environment Court proceedings. In particular, unless I state otherwise, this assessment is within my area of expertise, and I have not omitted to consider material facts known to me that might alter or detract from the opinions I express. 1.3 Purpose and scope of assessment 8. This SRIA forms part of the suite of technical assessments prepared for the RiverLink project (the Project). Its purpose is to assess the potential social and recreation impacts from the construction and operation of the Project. This SRIA has been undertaken in 1 accordance with the Waka Kotahi People Place and Environment Series: Social impact guide (2016).1 9. My assessment: describes the baseline social and recreation values of the Project Area,2 including a description of how the Project will connect to other projects in the area; describes the assessment methodology; identifies and assesses any recreational impacts, including any change to recreation activities, recreation facilities and/or recreational values; identifies and assesses any social impacts, including changes (positive and negative) to people’s fears and aspirations; access and connectivity; economy, business and employment; amenity and character; social and recreational infrastructure; people’s personal and property rights; and environmental factors; and identifies any measures to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects, in accordance with the RMA effects management hierarchy (where relevant). 10. Site visits were conducted by Alex Jepsen on 27 November 2020 and me on Saturday 13 February 2021. 11. Two open days were held with members of the community on 28 November 2020 and Saturday 13 February 2021. Alex Jepsen attended the first open day, and I attended the second day. Both Alex and I answered questions from the community on the social and recreation impact of the Project. It was also an opportunity to obtain feedback on any potential impacts that could occur as a result of the Project. 1.4 Assumptions and exclusions in this SRIA 12. This SRIA considers the potential social and recreation impacts at the regional, local community and ‘Project Area’ scales. The SRIA has not investigated impacts associated at the individual/household level, particularly with regard to the socio-economic impact of property acquisition. I understand that individual consultation with owners and occupiers within the Project Area, specifically in respect of property and site-specific issues is being undertaken by the Project Partners, as part of the wider Public Works Act 1981 process for the acquisition/lease of directly impacted properties. 13. This SRIA does not cover regional or local economic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Greater Wellington Regional Council Hutt Valley Public Transport Review
    Attachment 1 to Report 14.423 Greater Wellington Regional Council Hutt Valley Public Transport Review Data Analysis Summary Report September 2014 TDG Ref: 12561.003 140915 data analysis summary report v1 Attachment 1 to Report 14.423 Greater Wellington Regional Council Hutt Valley Public Transport Review Data Analysis Summary Report Quality Assurance Statement Prepared by: Catherine Mills Transportation Engineer Reviewed by: Jamie Whittaker Senior Transportation Planner Approved for Issue by: Doug Weir National Specialist – Public Transport Status: Final report Date: 15 September 2014 PO Box 30-721, Lower Hutt 5040 New Zealand P: +64 4 569 8497 www.tdg.co.nz 12561.003 140915 Data Analysis Summary Report v1 Attachment 1 to Report 14.423 Greater Wellington Regional Council, Hutt Valley Public Transport Review Data Analysis Report Page 1 Table of Contents 1. Preamble ....................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 3 3. Context .......................................................................................................................................... 4 4. Operational Review ....................................................................................................................... 7 4.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wellington Network Upgrade
    WELLINGTON NETWORK UPGRADE Better rail services for the region. Around 500,000 Wellingtonians and visitors take over 14 million passenger journeys each year on our Metro Rail Network. KiwiRail, Greater Wellington Regional Council and Metlink are working together to modernise the rail, thanks to investment of almost $300 million from the Government to enable: Train services to be more reliable. More people and freight travelling on rail in the future. The Wellington Metro Upgrade Programme is being delivered on a busy, well-maintained but ageing network where trains run 18 hours a day. The focus of our work is: Renewing existing network infrastructure to improve rail services. Renewing traction power overhead line system and signals power supply, and improving the track across the network including inside the four major tunnels. Adding capacity to the network so more people can travel on trains in the future while still allowing for freight services. This includes: Double tracking between Trentham and Upper Hutt. Improvements to Wellington station approaches. Changes at Plimmerton. More information www.kiwirail.co.nz (Wellington Metro Upgrade) HUTT LINE DOUBLE TRACKING More frequent, reliable trains. The 2.7 kilometres of rail line between Trentham and Upper Hutt is being double tracked so trains can travel in both directions at the same time. This will allow more frequent and reliable services along this section of the busy line from Wellington to Upper Hutt and Wairarapa. Stations are being upgraded and we are making it safer around our tracks. Wairarapa Existing Upper Hutt Future Connecting new second track to the network Level crossing upgrade at Blenheim Street Wallaceville Closing pedestrian crossing just North of Wallaceville New platform with shelters will be built in the style of Ava’s (pictured).
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 1 Wellington Regional Rail Strategic Direction 2020.Pdf
    WELLINGTON REGIONAL RAIL STRATEGIC DIRECTION 2020 Where we’ve come from Rail has been a key component of the Wellington Region’s transport network for more than 150 years. The first rail line was built in the 1870s between Wellington and Wairarapa. What is now known as the North Island Main Trunk followed in the 1880s, providing a more direct route to Manawatū and the north. Two branch lines were later added. The region has grown around the rail network, as villages have turned into towns and cities. Much of it was actively built around rail as transit-oriented development. Rail has become an increasingly important way for people to move about, particularly to Wellington’s CBD, and services and infrastructure have been continuously expanded and improved to serve an ever-growing population. The region is a leader in per capita use of public transport. Wellington Region Rail Timeline 1874 1927 1954 1982 2010 2021 First section of railway between Hutt line deviation opened as a branch Hutt line deviation to Manor EM class electric FP ‘Matangi’ class Expected Wellington and Petone between Petone and Waterloo Park, creating Melling line multiple units electric multiple completion 1955 introduced units introduced of Hutt line 1876 1935 Hutt line duplication to Trentham duplication, Hutt line to Upper Hutt Kāpiti line deviation to Tawa, creating 1983 and electrification to Upper Hutt 2011 Trentham to 1880 Johnsonville line Kāpiti line Rimutaka Tunnel and deviation Upper Hutt 1 Wairarapa line to Masterton 1 electrification Kāpiti line 2 1938 replace
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Hutt Valley Line
    2. Hutt Valley Line TDW | Transdev Train Replacement Booklet 4 SUMMARY OF HUTT VALLEY LINE TRAIN REPLACEMENT SERVICES OUTBOUND FROM WELLINGTON: When two buses depart for one service: • Bus 1: (Waterloo Loop) Depart Wellington to Ngauranga, drop of Woburn and connect to all stopper at Waterloo • Bus 2: Depart Wellington express to Petone, all stops to Waterloo, connect with Waterloo Loop and all stops to Upper Hutt • Manor Park is serviced by a shuttle operating between Manor Park and Silverstream INBOUND FROM UPPER-HUTT: When two buses are operating one service: • Bus 1: (Waterloo Loop) Departs Waterloo and then all stops to Wellington • Bus 2: Depart Upper Hutt all stops to Waterloo then express to Wellington • Manor Park is serviced by a shuttle operating between Manor Park and Silverstream HVL LINE HVL TDW | Transdev Train Replacement Booklet 5 TDW | Transdev Train Replacement Booklet 6 HUTT VALLEY LINE BUSES REPLACING TRAIN STOPS Ngauranga Inbound: On Hutt Road, after the underbridge Outbound: On Hutt Road, after the intersection HVL LINEHVL Petone Inbound: On Hutt Road, opposite the station Outbound: Bus stop B on Hutt Road, on the East side of the station TDW | Transdev Train Replacement Booklet 7 Ava Inbound: On Wakefield Street near the pedestrian over bridge access Outbound: On Wakefield Street, just before Cuba Street HVL LINE HVL Woburn Inbound: On Cambridge Terrace, opposite the station car park Outbound: The Cambridge Terrace bus shelter in front of the station car park TDW | Transdev Train Replacement Booklet 8 Waterloo
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Wellington Regional Council Collects Water from Rivers and An
    Greater Wellington Regional Council collects water from rivers and an aquifer, treats it to meet New Zealand’s drinking water standards and distributes this high-quality water to four city councils – Hutt, Porirua, Upper Hutt and Wellington – for their supply to consumers. Where does your water come from? How does the water get to your place? Our Te Marua Water Treatment Plant treats water from the The Regional Council operates 183km of pipes, which Hutt River, either directly or via two storage lakes near the connect its water sources and treatment plants to 43 city plant. The lakes hold 3,400 million litres, and are used to reservoirs. These pipes are up to 1,100mm in diameter. make up for any shortage of water from rivers, or after heavy Two main pipelines link the Te Marua and Wainuiomata rain when river water is too dirty to treat effectively. treatment plants to Wellington (see overleaf), with a connecting pipeline and pumping station at Ngauranga Gorge that allows the transfer of water from either pipeline to the other. This cross-connection gives security from disruption, by allowing water supply to all parts of the network from more than one source. Normally, water from each of our treatment plants is supplied to specific areas: Bulk water from: Is sent to: Te Marua Upper Hutt, Stokes Valley, Porirua and Wellington’s northern and western suburbs The Te Marua Water Treatment Plant Wainuiomata Wainuiomata and Wellington and storage lakes Waterloo Lower Hutt, Eastbourne and Wellington Our Wainuiomata Water Treatment Plant treats water from Gear Island Wellington (if required) the Wainuiomata and Orongorongo rivers and several smaller streams.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Sunday Festival Report and Survey Results
    2015 Sunday Festival Report and Survey Results CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................... 3 3.0 PURPOSE ................................................................................................................................ 3 4.0 FESTIVAL PROFILE .................................................................................................................. 4 5.0 SURVEY METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................... 11 6.0 FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................. 12 Who came to Te Rā? ...................................................................................................... 12 Where did people at Te Rā festival come from? ............................................................ 13 How did people hear about Te Rā? ................................................................................ 14 What the Te Rā festival means for those who came...................................................... 14 What did people think of Te Rā 2015? ........................................................................... 16 Entertainment, hauora and mātauranga tents and the youth zone .............................. 17 Stalls food
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Site Effects in the Lower Hutt Valley, New Zealand
    2694 MODELING SITE EFFECTS IN THE LOWER HUTT VALLEY, NEW ZEALAND Brian M ADAMS1, John B BERRILL2, Rob O DAVIS3 And John J TABER4 SUMMARY Lower Hutt City lies atop a wedge of Quaternary sediments forming a long alluvial valley. On its western edge the sediments butt up against the near vertical wall of the potentially active Wellington Fault, capable of an earthquake of moment magnitude 7.6. A two-dimensional linear finite-element method has been used to model the propagation of antiplane SH waves within the soft sediments and surrounding bedrock. The technique has proved to be an efficient and accurate means of modeling fine geological detail. Two detailed geological cross-sections through the Lower Hutt were modeled to gain an overall impression of the valley's seismic behaviour. It was found that horizontally propagating surface waves, generated at the valley edges, are the cause of significant amplification. The aptly named basin-edge effect – speculated to be the cause of a belt of severe shaking during the 1995 Kobe earthquake – is observed in the simulation results, occuring some 70-200 metres out from the fault. Fourier spectral ratios across the valley indicate a behaviour dominated by two-dimensional resonance, and compare favourably in magnitude with previously collected weak motion data. Certain resonant frequencies within the range 0.3-2.5 hertz are amplified up to 14 times that for nearby outcropping bedrock. Results are likely to be conservative due to the linear modeling, yet exclude fault-rupture effects due to the teleseismic nature of the input scheme. INTRODUCTION In this paper we describe our use of a two-dimensional finite-element numerical scheme to simulate ground motions from earthquake shaking in the soft sediments in-filling the Lower Hutt Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Background and Issues Paper 2010
    Hutt Corridor Plan Review Background and Issues Paper 2010 Important Note: This is a working paper, the purpose of which was to pull together a range of relevant information and statistics, and to identify relevant studies and policies, to assist the technical group in understanding the current context for the Hutt Corridor Plan review. The information and numbers generally reflect what was available during the earlier stages of the plan’s development during 2010. Significant recent updates on project status are noted throughout the paper. Where newer stats or data have become available since this paper was prepared, it has been used directly in the Draft Plan itself. PAGE 1 OF 105 PAGE 2 OF 105 Contents INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................6 POLICY CONTEXT FOR THE CORRIDOR PLAN REVIEW ...............................................9 1. National context ........................................................................................................................................................9 1.1 New Zealand Transport Strategy 2008..............................................................................................................9 1.2 Government Policy Statement (GPS) on Land Transport Funding...................................................................9 1.3 Safer Journeys 2020 ........................................................................................................................................10 1.4 NZ
    [Show full text]
  • Wellington City Public Transport Network Transport Public City Wellington KARORI
    Wellington City Public Transport Network Key High frequency bus routes 10-15 minutes daytime 1 2 3 7 21 22 15-60 evenings & weekends Standard bus routes 30-60 minutes all day increased frequency at peak times Peak only bus routes Rail services 34 12e HVL Hutt Valley Line Interchanges MEL Melling Line JVL Johnsonville Line TO TAWA Wellington Harbour Ferry KPL Kapiti¯ Line KENEPURU H WRL Wairarapa Line PORIRUA 60 60e GRENADA 1 VILLAGE 1 Woodridge Glenside 52 19 TO EASTBOURNE, CHURTON PARK 57 LOWER HUTT, aparangi UPPER HUTT & P 58 19e WAIRARAPA Baylands 52 HVL 1 56 NEWLANDS 85x MEL est 84 WRL W JOHNSONVILLE KPL ville 81 n 83 1 Johnso Raroa JVL 24 22 Ngauranga 25 Broadmeadows 24 26 52 illage KhandallahV 83 KHANDALLAH Box Hill 19e N 58 Simla Crescent NGAIO 57 Hutt Rd warua Street A 56 Ngaio 85x ton Downs 25 f Matiu / Somes Island 22 Cro 84 Otari Wilton’s Bush 81 Wilton Mairangi WADESTOWN 14 14 Sky Stadium ty 13 rsi Victorianive U Karori West Thorndon 34 Pipitea WELLINGTON STATION To Days Bay Parliament (Eastbourne) Karori MallNORTHLAND WHF 2 2 18e 37 LAMBTON QY Queens WELLINGTON KARORI Wharf 33 Botanic HARBOUR KARORI TUNNEL KARORI Gardens 18e 21 37 car Cable Willis Street Karori South 22 Te Papa Museum Manners Street Wrights Hill Zealandia Eco-sanctuary 7 27 KELBURNVictoria 14 24 21 Oriental Bay UniversityKelburn COURTENAY PL Victoria 20 Mt Crawford St 25 18e Mt Victoria Taranaki St Lookout 12e Roseneath 24 Miramar Highbury Massey Basin 35 North University 12 Reserve Evans Bay 36 31x 1 23 MIRAMAR 17 3 35 Aro Valley 2 Scorching Bay 32x 29 39 30x Hutchison Maupuia 18e Road 18e HATAITAI HOSPITAL H 20 14 27 NEWTOWN Constable 12e BROOKLYN St 12 18e 12 18e KILBIRNIE 17 Vogeltown SHOPS MIRAMAR 32x 23 30x Kingston 91 Strathmore Kowhai Park Rongotai Park Shops 39 7 Melrose 3 2 SEATOUN o Berhampore Wellingtono 3 Z 29 29 AIRPORT Island Bay 12e Shops39 Happy Valley 36 12 28 30x Southgate STRATHMORE 3 PARK Hill Moa Beacon Point Owhiro Bay 23 29 32x LYALL BAY 1 HOUGHTON BAY ISLAND BAY.
    [Show full text]
  • Belmont Walkways — NZ Walking Access Commission Ara Hīkoi Aotearoa
    9/28/2021 Belmont walkways — NZ Walking Access Commission Ara Hīkoi Aotearoa Belmont walkways Walking Mountain Biking Dog Friendly Circular Track (Loop) Difculties Easy , Medium , Hard Length 20 km Journey Time Between 1 hour and 8 hours, depending on track Region Wellington https://www.walkingaccess.govt.nz/track/belmont-walkways/pdfPreview 1/7 9/28/2021 Belmont walkways — NZ Walking Access Commission Ara Hīkoi Aotearoa Sub-Regions Porirua , Wellington City Part of Collections Walking Access Commission Walkways , Belmont Regional Park Track maintained by Greater Wellington Regional Council Belmont Walkway is the name for a collection of interconnected walking tracks in the Belmont Regional Park, north of Wellington. The walkway takes in a variety of terrain, including rolling hills, native forest and gentle streams. Below are some of the most popular options. All walking times are for the return trip. Dogs are permitted in the Korokoro, Stratton Street and Dry Creek valleys. Keep them under control and remove droppings. Waterfall Track Moderate grade 1 hour A pleasant scramble for all ages which follows Dry Creek from the park entrance through native bush up towards a small waterfall and back again. Expect wet feet as you cross the stream several times. Flat grassy areas near the start are ideal for picnics. Great for young family groups, especially in summer. Not suitable for buggies. Dogs OK - keep them under control and remove droppings. You can download a map of this walk from the right of this screen. Korokoro Dam Loop Moderate grade 1 hour A walk that takes in the historic Korokoro Dam, regenerating and mature native bush.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Assessment #9 Traffic Impacts and Transport Integration Assessment
    RiverLink Notices of Requirement for Designations and Applications for Resource Consent Volume Four: Supporting Technical Reports Technical Report #9 Traffic Impacts and Transport Integration IN THE MATTER OF The Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER OF Resource consent applications under section 88, and Notices of Requirement under section 168, of the Act in relation to the RiverLink project BY Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency Requiring Authority Greater Wellington Regional Council Requiring Authority Hutt City Council Requiring Authority RIVERLINK TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT #9 TRAFFIC IMPACTS AND TRANSPORT INTEGRATION ASSESSMENT Table of contents 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ 3 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................... 6 4 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................... 14 5 EXISTING AND FUTURE TRANSPORT ENVIRONMENT ................................................. 20 6 ASSESSMENT OF OPERATIONAL TRANSPORT EFFECTS ........................................... 37 7 ASSESSMENT OF CONSTRUCTION TRANSPORT EFFECTS ........................................ 61 8 MEASURES TO AVOID, REMEDY OR MITIGATE ACTUAL OR POTENTIAL ADVERSE TRANSPORT AND TRAFFIC EFFECTS .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tirohanga Community Emergency Hub Guide
    REVIEWED SEPTEMBER 2019 Tirohanga Community Emergency Hub Guide This Hub is a place for the community to coordinate your efforts to help each other during and after a disaster. Objectives of the Community Emergency Hub are to: › Provide information so that your community knows how to help each other and stay safe. › Understand what is happening. Wellington Region › Solve problems using what your community has available. Emergency Managment Office › Provide a safe gathering place for members of the Logo Specificationscommunity to support one another. Single colour reproduction WELLINGTON REGION Whenever possible, the logo should be reproduced EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT in full colour. When producing the logo in one colour, OFFICE the Wellington Region Emergency Managment may be in either black or white. WELLINGTON REGION Community Emergency Hub Guide a EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT OFFICE Colour reproduction It is preferred that the logo appear in it PMS colours. When this is not possible, the logo should be printed using the specified process colours. WELLINGTON REGION EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT OFFICE PANTONE PMS 294 PMS Process Yellow WELLINGTON REGION EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT OFFICE PROCESS C100%, M58%, Y0%, K21% C0%, M0%, Y100%, K0% Typeface and minimum size restrictions The typeface for the logo cannot be altered in any way. The minimum size for reproduction of the logo is 40mm wide. It is important that the proportions of 40mm the logo remain at all times. Provision of files All required logo files will be provided by WREMO. Available file formats include .eps, .jpeg and .png About this guide This guide provides information to help you set up and run the Community Emergency Hub.
    [Show full text]