DOCSLIB.ORG

Exploring Design and Policy Options for Orbital Infrastructure Projects by Lieutenant Junior Grade Benjamin L. Putbrese, U.S. Na

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exploring Design and Policy Options for Orbital Infrastructure Projects by Lieutenant Junior Grade Benjamin L. Putbrese, U.S. Na Exploring Design and Policy Options for Orbital Infrastructure Projects by Lieutenant Junior Grade Benjamin L. Putbrese, U.S. Navy B.S. Aerospace Engineering United States Naval Academy, 2013 Submitted to the Engineering Systems Division in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Technology and Policy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2015 ©2015 Benjamin L. Putbrese. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author: ________________________________________________________________ Engineering Systems Division May 8, 2015 Certified by:_______________________________________________________________________ Daniel E. Hastings Cecil and Ida Green Education Professor of Engineering Systems and Aeronautics and Astronautics Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: _____________________________________________________________________ Dava J. Newman Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Engineering Systems Director, Technology and Policy Program 2 This work is sponsored by the United States Department of Defense under Contract FA8721-05- C-0002. Opinions, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by the United States Government. 3 Exploring Design and Policy Options for Orbital Infrastructure Projects by Lieutenant Junior Grade Benjamin L. Putbrese, U.S. Navy Submitted to the Engineering Systems Division 8 May 2015 In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Technology and Policy ABSTRACT The space industry is currently at a significant inflection point. New economies are forming in low- Earth orbit (LEO), driven by miniaturization of technologies and the promise of lower launch costs, which should then allow many of these LEO systems to capitalize on designs incorporating smaller, shorter-lived spacecraft in highly-disaggregated constellations. Meanwhile, many spacecraft at geosynchronous orbit are continuing along a trend towards increasingly massive and longer-lasting satellites, and while they do represent some of the most exquisite, highest-performing satellites ever launched, some experts now feel that such trends are unsustainable and are beginning to place increasing strain on the underlying industry. To support current and future spacecraft, orbital infrastructures have been proposed as a means of providing on-orbit services to customer spacecraft and guiding space architectures towards more sustainable paradigms. In LEO, an infrastructure of communications and data relay spacecraft is envisioned as a means of aiding new and existing space enterprises in the areas of satellite connectivity and downlink capability. Meanwhile, an on-orbit servicing (OOS) infrastructure, located primarily in geosynchronous orbit, would provide services such as repair, rescue, refueling, and upgrading of customer spacecraft, in order to alleviate the identified space industry trends. Physics and cost modeling, as well as tradespace exploration, are used to identify optimal LEO infrastructure designs, while system dynamics modeling is used to assess the trends likely to occur in the overall space industry as OOS is incorporated into space architectures. The primary conclusion from the analysis of LEO infrastructure designs is that, when designing for global connectivity, there is an optimal design point between a small constellation of larger spacecraft and a very large constellation of small spacecraft, but this will also depend on the intended mission of the infrastructure and the number of customers expecting to be serviced. Then, for an OOS infrastructure, it is determined that relatively low costs and heavy incorporation of servicing capabilities into customer architectures are needed to ensure long-term sustainability of such a project. Finally, the policy implications for both infrastructure concepts are discussed, with a heavy focus on options for the funding and development regimes employed to implement the infrastructures, as well as the major political and legal implications expected to accompany these projects. Thesis Supervisor: Dr. Daniel E. Hastings Title: Cecil and Ida Green Education Professor of Engineering Systems and Aeronautics and Astronautics 4 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Assisting the author of this thesis was Dr. Daniel Hastings, whose deep knowledge and experience in space systems was crucial to the formulation, guidance, and ultimate delivery of this work. Also massively helpful in the completion of this thesis was Capt. Paul La Tour, USAF, who worked closely with the author for over a year on all of the modeling and methods employed to generate the final results. Dr. Sumanth Kaushik of MIT Lincoln Laboratory provided a wealth of knowledge and guidance throughout, as did Dr. Donna Rhodes, Dr. Adam Ross, and all of the researchers at MIT’s System Engineering Advancement Research Initiative (SEAri). Finally, the author would like to thank his parents, grandparents, brother, and sister for all of their loving support and encouragement. They have never been quite sure what the author has been up to since leaving home, and he hopes it stays that way. 6 Contents Figures and Tables .............................................................................................. 9 Introduction .......................................................................................................13 Research Questions and Hypotheses .................................................................................. 16 Background and Literature Review................................................................19 Defining Infrastructure........................................................................................................ 19 Global Positioning System (GPS) ................................................................................... 23 U.S. Interstate Highway System ..................................................................................... 25 U.S. National Airspace System (NAS) ........................................................................... 27 On-Orbit Servicing (OOS) .................................................................................................. 29 DARPA OOS Programs .................................................................................................. 30 NASA OOS Programs .................................................................................................... 32 OOS Case Study: Hubble Space Telescope .................................................................... 33 Future Potential for OOS ................................................................................................ 35 Orbital Communications and Data Relay Infrastructure .................................................... 38 TDRSS and EDRS .......................................................................................................... 38 LEO Infrastructure Concepts .......................................................................................... 40 Space Industry Trends......................................................................................................... 41 Space Policy ........................................................................................................................ 45 1967 Outer Space Treaty ................................................................................................ 45 Space Policy of the United States ................................................................................... 47 Space Industry Sectors .................................................................................................... 48 Methodology ......................................................................................................51 Assessing Designs for a LEO Communications and Data Relay Infrastructure ................. 51 Analysis Framework and Utility Function ...................................................................... 52 7 Physics and Cost Modeling ............................................................................................. 56 Tradespace Exploration .................................................................................................. 62 Validation of Physics and Cost Models .......................................................................... 66 Assessing On-Orbit Servicing: System Dynamics Approach ............................................. 69 System Dynamics Methodological Background ............................................................. 70 Incorporating Behavioral Economics Theories with System Dynamics ........................ 73 Level of Analysis and Modeling Boundary .................................................................... 76 Building the System Dynamics Model ........................................................................... 79 Major System Dynamics Model Structures .................................................................... 80 Using System Dynamics To Assess On-Orbit Servicing Effects ................................... 94 Results ................................................................................................................97 Case Study 1: LEO Communications and Data Relay Infrastructure with Global Coverage ..................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stable Orbits of Rigid, Rotating, Precessing, Massive Rings
    Stable Orbits of Rigid, Rotating, Precessing, Massive Rings Edward D. Rippert Whitehawk Systems, 3 Whitehawk Circle, Boise, ID, 83716, USA. [email protected] The dynamics of a rigid, rotating, precessing, massive ring orbiting a point mass within the perimeter of the ring are considered. It is demonstrated that orbits dynamically stable against perturbations in three dimensions exist for a range of rigid body rotation parameters of the ring. Previous analysis and some well-known works of fiction have considered the stability of both rigid and flexible, non-precessing ring systems and found that they are unstable in the plane of the ring unless an active stabilization system is employed. There does not appear to be any analyses previously published considering rigid body precession of such a system or that demonstrate passive stability in three dimensions. Deviations from perfect rigidity and possible applications of such a system are discussed. Keywords: Orbital Ring, Ring World, Stability, Precession, Magic Angle I. Introduction Solid rings rotating about a central mass have been considered for various applications ranging from a ring of geosynchronous satellites around the Earth [1] (Polyakov-Ring) to fictional accounts of a gigantic artificial habitat around a star rotating to provide artificial gravity [2] (Niven-Ring). A Polyakov-Ring rotates at or slightly above the orbital speed at its distance from the central mass. As such it lacks significant tension on the ring and is a flexible structure. It has been shown that such a structure is unstable against perturbations in the plane of the ring but can be stabilized by a feedback control system controlling the local length of ring segments [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Tethers in Space Handbook - Second Edition
    Tethers In Space Handbook - Second Edition - (NASA-- - I SECOND LU IT luN (Spectr Rsdrci ystLSw) 259 P C'C1 ? n: 1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of Space Flight Advanced Program Development NASA Headquarters Code MD Washington, DC 20546 This document is the product of support from many organizations and individuals. SRS Technologies, under contract to NASA Headquarters, compiled, updated, and prepared the final document. Sponsored by: National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA Headquarters, Code MD Washington, DC 20546 Contract Monitor: Edward J. Brazil!, NASA Headquarters Contract Number: NASW-4341 Contractor: SRS Technologies Washington Operations Division 1500 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 800 Arlington, Virginia 22209 Project Manager: Dr. Rodney W. Johnson, SRS Technologies Handbook Editors: Dr. Paul A. Penzo, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Paul W. Ammann, SRS Technologies Tethers In Space Handbook - Second Edition - May 1989 Prepared For: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of Space Flight Advanced Program Development NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration FOREWORD The Tethers in Space Handbook Second Edition represents an update to the initial volume issued in September 1986. As originally intended, this handbook is designed to serve as a reference manual for policy makers, program managers, educators, engineers, and scientists alike. It contains information for the uninitiated, providing insight into the fundamental behavior of tethers in space. For those familiar with space tethers, it summarizes past and ongoing studies and programs, a complete bibliography of tether publications, and names, addresses, and phone numbers of workers in the field. Perhaps its most valuable asset is the brief description of nearly 50 tether applications which have been proposed and analyzed over the past 10 years.
    [Show full text]
  • 20090015024.Pdf
    Wireless Power Transmission Options for Space Solar Power Seth Potter1, Mark Henley1, Dean Davis1, Andrew Born1, Martin Bayer1, Joe Howell2, and John Mankins3 1The Boeing Company, 2NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, 3formerly NASA HQ, currently Artemis Innovation Management Solutions LLC Abstract for a presentation to be given at the State of Space Solar Power Technology Workshop Lake Buena Vista, Florida 2-3 October 2008 Space Solar Power (SSP), combined with Wireless Power Transmission (WPT), offers the far-term potential to solve major energy problems on Earth. In the long term, we aspire to beam energy to Earth from geostationary Earth orbit (GEO), or even further distances in space. In the near term, we can beam power over more moderate distances, but still stretch the limits of today’s technology. In recent studies, a 100 kWe-class “Power Plug” Satellite and a 10 kWe-class Lunar Polar Solar Power outpost have been considered as the first steps in using these WPT options for SSP. Our current assessments include consideration of orbits, wavelengths, and structural designs to meet commercial, civilian government, and military needs. Notional transmitter and receiver sizes are considered for use in supplying 5 to 40 MW of power. In the longer term, lunar or asteroidal material can be used. By using SSP and WPT technology for near-term missions, we gain experience needed for sound decisions in designing and developing larger systems to send power from space to Earth. Wireless Power Transmission Options for Space Solar Power Seth Potter
    [Show full text]
  • Achievable Space Elevators for Space Transportation and Starship
    1991012826-321 :1 TRANSPORTATIONACHIEVABLE SPACEAND ELEVATORSTARSHIPSACCELERATFOR SP_CEION ._ Fl_t_ Dynamic_L',_rator_ N91-22162 Wright-PattersonAFB,Ohio ABSTRACT Spaceelevatorconceptslorlow-costspacelau,'x,,hea_rereviewed.Previousconceptssuffered;rein requirementsforultra-high-strengthmaterials,dynamicallyunstablesystems,orfromdangerofoollisionwith spacedeb._s.Theuseofmagneticgrain_reams,firstF_posedby BenoitLeben,solvestheseproblems. Magneticgrain_reamscansupportshortspace6!evatorsforliftingpayloadscheaplyintoEarthorbit, overcomingthematerialstrengthp_Oiemin.buildingspaceelevators.Alternatively,thestreamcouldsupport an internationaspaceportl circling__heEarthdailyt_nsofmilesabovetheequator,accessibleto adv_ncad aircraft.Marscouldbe equippedwitha similargrainstream,usingmaterialfromitsmoonsPhobosandDefines. Grain-streamarcsaboutthesuncould_ usedforfastlaunchestotheouterplanetsandforaccelerating starshipsto nearikjhtspeedforinterstella:recor_naisar',cGraie. nstreamsareessentiallyimperviousto collisions,andcouldreducethecost_f spacetranspo_ationbyan o_er c,,fmagnih_e. iNTRODUCTION Themajorob_,tacletorapi( spacedevei,apmentisthehighco_ oflaunct_!,'D_gayloadsintoEarthorbit. Currentlaunchcostsare morethan_3000per kilogramand, rocketvehicles_ch asNASP,S,_nger_,'_the AdvancedLaunchSystemwiltstillcost$500perkilogram.Theprospectsforspaceente_dseandsettlement. arenotgoodunlessthesehighlaunchc_stsarereducedsignificantly. Overthepastthirtyyears,severalconceptshavebeendevelopedforlaunchir_la{_opayloadsintoEarth orbitcheaplyusing"_rJeceelevators."The._estructurescanbesupportedbyeithe.rs_ati,for::
    [Show full text]
  • The E-Magazine of the British Interplanetary Society Reaching Beyond the Earth
    The e-Magazine of the British Interplanetary Society Reaching Beyond the Earth ne of the most dynamic and System is obsolete almost before it starts. again we look forward to seeing more of exciting areas of current human This is just one of the many fascinating areas these showcases in the future. Also, John Oendeavour must surely be the which lie at the very heart of this key area of Silvester completes his review of Britain’s aerospace industry. It represents mankind’s the Society’s remit, and which we hope to be first space rocket and I talk about the latest achievements at their very best, and offers exploring in future issues of Odyssey. I am updates with Mars One. hope for the great enterprise of space travel sure that, like me, you look forward to reading to which the British Interplanetary Society Terry’s future speculations. In the next issue we delve into the strange aspires. and murky world of conspiracy theories, Also in this issue we are very pleased to with a short story and Richard’s Radical For that reason, I am delighted to introduce have a short story entitled “Shadows” from Vectors column devoted to this endlessly a new occasional column of “Aerospace Stephen Baxter, the well known author and fascinating subject. Richard will also be Speculations” to Odyssey which focuses BIS member. We are hoping to have a series telling us more about Alex Storer’s artwork, on this area of activity, written by our of these 500 word short stories from other and is writing an article about Alex’s latest own Assistant Editor Terry Don with his authors in due course.
    [Show full text]
  • System Engineering Analysis of Terraforming Mars with an Emphasis on Resource Importation Technology
    LMU/LLS Theses and Dissertations 12-2018 System Engineering Analysis of Terraforming Mars with an Emphasis on Resource Importation Technology Brandon Wong Loyola Marymount University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/etd Part of the Systems Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Wong, Brandon, "System Engineering Analysis of Terraforming Mars with an Emphasis on Resource Importation Technology" (2018). LMU/LLS Theses and Dissertations. 888. https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/etd/888 This Research Projects is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in LMU/LLS Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. System Engineering Analysis of Terraforming Mars with an Emphasis on Resource Importation Technology Loyola Marymount University, Systems Engineering Leadership Program Capstone Project Abstract This project uses System Engineering principles to delve into the viability of different methods for Terraforming Mars, with a comparison between Paraterraforming, Terraforming and Bioforming. It will then examine one subsystem that will be integral to the terraforming process, which is the space infrastructure necessary to import enough gases to recreate Earth’s atmosphere on Mars. It will analyze the viability of Chemical Rockets, Nuclear Rockets, Space
    [Show full text]
  • Interstellar Index: Papersinterstellarindex
    Interstellar Index: papersInterstellarindex http://www.interstellarindex.com/technical-papers/ Interstellarindex The reliable web site for interstellar information designed and managed by www.I4IS.org Papers On this page we list every technical paper known to us that has been published on interstellar studies or related themes. This includes papers on: Spacecraft concepts, designs and mission architectures, robotic and manned, which may be relevant to interstellar flight; Space technologies at all readiness levels (TRL1-9), especially in propulsion; General relativity and quantum field theory as applied to proposed warp drives and wormholes in spacetime; Any other breakthrough physics concepts applicable to propulsion; Nearby mission targets, particularly exoplanets within 20 light-years; Sociology, politics, economics, philosophy and other interstellar issues in the humanities; The search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI) and related search and messaging issues. A few pieces of information are missing, as shown by queries {in curly brackets}. Please be patient while we fill in these gaps. * * * 2013 Baxter, S., “Project Icarus: Interstellar Spaceprobes and Encounters with Extraterrestial Intelligence”, JBIS, 66, no.1/2, pp.51-60, Jan./Feb. 2013. Benford, J., “Starship Sails Propelled by Cost-Optimized Directed Energy”, JBIS, 66, no.3/4, pp.85-95, March/April 2013. Beyster, M.A., J. Blasi, J. Sibilia, T. Zurbuchen and A. Bowman, “Sustained Innovation through Shared Capitalism and Democratic Governance”, JBIS, 66, no.3/4, pp.133-137, March/April 2013. Breeden, J.L., “Gravitational Assist via Near-Sun Chaotic Trajectories of Binary Objects”, JBIS, 66, no.5/6, pp.190-194, May/June 2013. Cohen, M.M., R.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Leveraging Allied and Commercial Capabilities for Resilience 1
    December 2017 Leveraging Allied and Commercial Capabilities to Enhance Resilience A Virtual Think Tank (ViTTa)® Report Deeper Analyses Clarifying Insights Better Decisions Produced in support of the Strategic Multilayer Assessment www.NSIteam.com (SMA) Office (Joint Staff, J39) Leveraging Allied and Commercial Capabilities for Resilience 1 Author Dr. Belinda Bragg Please direct inquiries to Dr. Belinda Bragg at [email protected] ViTTa® Project Team Dr. Allison Astorino-Courtois Sarah Canna Nicole Peterson Executive VP Principal Analyst Associate Analyst Weston Aviles Dr. Larry Kuznar George Popp Analyst Chief Cultural Sciences Officer Senior Analyst Dr. Belinda Bragg Dr. Sabrina Pagano Dr. John A. Stevenson Principal Research Scientist Principal Research Scientist Principal Research Scientist Interview Team1 Weston Aviles Nicole Peterson Analyst Associate Analyst Sarah Canna George Popp Principal Analyst Senior Analyst What is ViTTa®? NSI’s Virtual Think Tank (ViTTa®) provides rapid response to critical information needs by pulsing our global network of subject matter experts (SMEs) to generate a wide range of expert insight. For this SMA Contested Space Operations project, ViTTa was used to address 23 unclassified questions submitted by the Joint Staff and US Air Force project sponsors. The ViTTa team received written and verbal input from over 111 experts from National Security Space, as well as civil, commercial, legal, think tank, and academic communities working space and space policy. Each Space ViTTa report contains two sections: 1) a summary response to the question asked; and 2) the full written and/or transcribed interview input received from each expert contributor organized alphabetically. Biographies for all expert contributors have been collated in a companion document.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Elevators: an Advanced Earth-Space Infrastructure for the New Millennium
    National Aeronautics and NASA/CP—2000–210429 Space Administration AD33 George C. Marshall Space Flight Center Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama 35812 Space Elevators An Advanced Earth-Space Infrastructure for the New Millennium Compiled by D.V. Smitherman, Jr. Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama This publication is based on the findings from the Advanced Space Infrastructure Workshop on Geostationary Orbiting Tether “Space Elevator” Concepts, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, June 8–10, 1999. August 2000 The NASA STI Program Office…in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected the advancement of aeronautics and space papers from scientific and technical conferences, science. The NASA Scientific and Technical symposia, seminars, or other meetings sponsored Information (STI) Program Office plays a key or cosponsored by NASA. part in helping NASA maintain this important role. • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, technical, or historical information from NASA programs, The NASA STI Program Office is operated by projects, and mission, often concerned with Langley Research Center, the lead center for subjects having substantial public interest. NASA’s scientific and technical information. The NASA STI Program Office provides access to the • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. NASA STI Database, the largest collection of English-language translations of foreign scientific aeronautical and space science STI in the world. The and technical material pertinent to NASA’s Program Office is also NASA’s institutional mission. mechanism for disseminating the results of its research and development activities. These results Specialized services that complement the STI are published by NASA in the NASA STI Report Program Office’s diverse offerings include creating Series, which includes the following report types: custom thesauri, building customized databases, organizing and publishing research results…even • TECHNICAL PUBLICATION.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study for Multiply Reusable Space Launch System
    Feasibility Study For Multiply Reusable Space Launch System. Mikhail V. Shubov University of MA Lowell One University Ave, Lowell, MA 01854 E-mail: [email protected] Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 State of Art and Proposed Orbital Delivery Systems 5 2.1 HistoricalLaunchCosts. ..... 5 2.2 LaunchCostReduction . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... 6 2.3 SingleStagetoOrbit(SSTO)Concept . ....... 7 2.4 Non-RocketSpaceLaunch . ... 7 3 Multiply Reusable Launch System – Purpose and Concept 9 3.1 EarlyStagesofSolarSystemColonization . .......... 9 3.2 The Concept of Multiply Reusable Launch System Consistingof MPDS and MPTO 10 4 Rocket Motion and Propulsion 11 4.1 RocketFlightPhysics.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... 11 4.1.1 RocketMotion ................................ 12 4.1.2 Lossesof v ................................. 15 △ 4.2 LiquidRocketEngines ............................. ... 16 4.2.1 Enginespecifications . .. 16 4.2.2 Combustionchambertemperature . .... 17 4.3 LiquidRocketFuelsandOxidizers . ....... 18 arXiv:2107.13513v1 [physics.soc-ph] 19 Apr 2021 4.3.1 CryogenicPropellantforMPDSEngines . ..... 18 4.3.2 HypergolicPropellantforMPTOEngines . ...... 19 4.4 PropellantCost .................................. .. 21 4.4.1 MPDSPropellant–$188PerTonAverage. .... 21 4.4.2 MPTOPropellant–$2,000PerTonAverage . .... 23 1 4.4.3 OrbitalLaunchFuelBill . .. 24 5 Rocket Parameters and Performance 25 5.1 MidpointDeliverySystem(MPDS) . ..... 25 5.1.1 MainparametersofMPDSstages . .. 26 5.1.2 PerformanceandtimetableofMPDSstages . ...... 27 5.2 MidpointtoOrbitDeliverySystem(MPTO)
    [Show full text]
  • Rocket Propulsion
    TERM PAPER OF FLUID MECHANICS MEC(207) TOPIC:- ROCKET PROPULSION SUBMITTED TO: SUBMITTED BY: Mr. DONGA RAMESH RAKESH KUMAR DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENG ROLL:-RF4901B59 REGD:- 10906652 B.Tech(ME) Pr.code:-152 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I take this opportunity to express my sincere thanks to all those people who helped me in completing this project successfully; this work of creation would not have been possible without their kind help, cooperation and extended support. First and foremost sincere thanks to my project guide Mr. RAMESH SIR for his valuable guidance for completion of this work and also for providing the necessary facilities and support. Also I would sincerely like to thanks all my friends, faculty members and coordinators whose valuable suggestions and motivational words provided me required strength for completion of this term paper. I also thank the educational websites from which I have taken help. RAKESH KUMAR CONTENTS:- 1. Introduction 2. Thrust 3. Conservation of Momentum 4. Impulse & Momentum 5. Combustion & Exhaust Velocity 6. Specific Impulse 7. Rocket Engines 8. Nozzle 9. Spacecraft propulsion 10.Need 11.Effectiveness 12.Electromagnetic propulsion 13.Launch mechanism 14.References Introduction to Rocket Propulsion Rocket propulsion of an object is achieved by the combustion of fuel (propellant) and an oxidiser, both of which are carried by the object. The explosive energy of combustion is vectored in a linear fashion away from the body. This vectored energy provides an opposing thrust to the body causing it to accelerate. It is similar to jet propulsion except that here, oxygen from the atmosphere is used as the oxidant for the fuel.
    [Show full text]
  • Tethers in Space Handbook
    Tethers In Space Handbook Edited by M.L. Cosmo and E.C. Lorenzini Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory for NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Grant NAG8-1160 monitored by C.C. Rupp M.L. Cosmo and E.C. Lorenzini, Principal Investigators Third Edition December 1997 The Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory is a member of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Front Cover: (left) Photo of TSS-1 taken from the Shuttle cargo bay, 1992; (right) Photo of SEDS-2 in orbit taken from the ground, 1994. ' FOREWORD A new edition of the Tethers in Space Handbook was needed after the last edition published in 1989. Tether-related activities have been quite busy in the 90's. We have had the flights of TSSI and TSS1-R, SEDS-1 and -2, PMG, TIPS and OEDIPUS. In less than three years there have been one international Conference on Tethers in Space, held in Washington DC, and three workshops, held at ESA/Estec in the Netherlands, at ISAS in Japan and at the University of Michigan, Ann Harbor. The community has grown and we finally have real flight data to compare our models with. The life of spaceborne tethers has not been always easy and we got our dose of setbacks, but we feel pretty optimistic for the future. We are just stepping out of the pioneering stage to start to use tethers for space science and technological applications. As we are writing this handbook TiPs, a NRL tether project is flying above our heads. There is no emphasis in affirming that as of today spaceborne tethers are a reality and their potential is far from being fully appreciated.
    [Show full text]