DOCSLIB.ORG

The Russian Revolution •Jan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Russian Revolution •Jan Causes for Revolution The Russian Revolution •Jan. 1905 – “Bloody Sunday” Protestors are shot by the Tsar’s troops. • The Great War 1914-1918 •February Revolution- March 8, 1917 – Bread shortages lead to strikes. • March 15, 1917 – Tsar Nicholas abdicates. • April 1917 – Lenin returns to Russia. • “Red October” –November Bolshevik Revolution of 1917. • November 1917 – Lenin and The Romanovs the Bolsheviks institute the Soviet Regime. Tsar Nicholas II was from the ruling • July 16, 1918 – The dynasty called the Romanovs. They Romanovs are murdered. • 1918-Russia is renamed the had ruled Imperial Russia for 300 Russian Soviet Federated Images above, Tsar Nicholas II and his wife and Socialist Republic or USSR. years. children. Maps of Imperial Russia and Europe Upper left - map of the world. Lower left – close up of Europe. Above – close-up of Russia. Map of Imperial Russia Highlight Moscow – the capital of Russia Highlight St. Petersburg – modeled in the European style, it is where the Russian nobility lived, and where the Winter Palace is located. Highlight Yekaterinburg – this is where the Romanovs will be killed. Highlight Siberia – this is where political prisoners were exiled. The Russian Revolution The Seeds of Revolution Causes – Tsar Nicholas Romanov •Nicholas II was an autocratic ruler who relied on the army and his bureaucracy to hold up his regime. •Unpopular moves on his part, the marriage to his “German Princess” Alexandra, the shooting deaths of peasants on “Bloody Sunday,” and Tsar /Czar Nicholas II finally his involvement of Russia into above. the bloody mess that was World War I. The Russian Revolution The Seeds of Revolution Causes – Tsar Nicholas II •In Russia, the peasants looked up to the Tsar like God. The poor for centuries, blamed their problems on local officials or thought that suffering was a part of the Christian experience. Finally, they believed in their hearts, that if only the Tsar knew of their suffering, he would end it the way a Icon of Tsar /Czar Nicholas II modern-age Super hero would. above. The Russian Revolution The Seeds of Revolution Causes – Tsar Nicholas II •He was described as gentle, kind and Who was Nicholas Romanov Really? friendly. He was educated and spoke 4 languages. He loved anything connected with the military. •Above all else, he was a man who deeply loved his wife and children, even though it may have cost him his thrown in Tsar /Czar Nicholas II eating with his wife and the end. children above. The Russian Revolution The Seeds of Revolution Causes – Tsar Nicholas II Who was Nicholas Romanov Really? •Negatives – He was taught “God made you Tsar. To fail to rule as an autocrat =failure to God.” He was trained to ruthlessly crush opposition. •Finally, Nicholas was known for his stubborn refusal to change and for allowing his foolish wife to rule in his The Tsar and Tsarina at the absence. coronation. The Russian Revolution The Seeds of Revolution A Romanov Family Secret •In Aug. 1904, the young Tsarevich Alexis was born. The secret – he was a hemophiliac. •His mother was desperate for anyone who could help her son. Even someone who would ruin the reputation of the royal family. Painting of young Alexis above. Images of the Romanovs What do these photos tell you about the Romanov’s? The Russian Revolution The Seeds of Revolution “The Dark One” - Rasputin •A mystic named Rasputin was supported and protected by the Romanovs. •His talent, the ability to stop the little prince from bleeding to death. •His influence over the Tsar and Tsarina were a constant source of Gregory Rasputin above. criticism from the Russian nobility. The Russian Revolution The Seeds of Revolution Causes – 1905 -“Bloody Sunday” •“Bloody Sunday” – 120,000 workers marched to the Winter Palace thinking they were going to petition the Tsar and tell him their problems. •The Tsar’s troops fired on the crowds, killing 92 and wounding 2-300 people. Image from Bloody Sunday. The Russian Revolution The Seeds of Revolution Causes – 1905 -“Bloody Sunday” •The Tsar was not in St. Petersburg, nor was he aware of the worker’s belief that they would meet with him. •Nevertheless, this shattered the belief that the Tsar and his people were one. People said, “The Tsar will not help us, so we have no Tsar.” Images and poster from Bloody Sunday. The Russian Revolution The Seeds of Revolution Causes – The Great War •Under Nicholas II’s leadership, Russia lost a war with Japan in 1905. •In 1914, Nicholas involved Russia in World War I. Tsar /Czar Nicholas II taking over the troops in World War I. The Russian Revolution The Seeds of Revolution Causes – 1915 -The Great War •The biggest mistake made by the Tsar was to take over the Russian army in 1915. •Militarily, he was a disaster. Russian losses to the Germans were catastrophic. •In addition, he left his wife Alexandra, in charge of Russia while he was gone. The Tsarina, Alexandra. List 3 Failures made by Tsar Nicholas II The Russian Revolution The Seeds of Revolution Causes –The Great War •1914-1916 - 2 million soldiers were killed and 4-6 million were wounded or captured. •The war also caused food shortages . Finally, Alexandra was incapable of running the country in her husband’s absence. Images from the Russian loss to the Germans at Tannenberg. The Russian Revolution The Seeds of Revolution Rasputin’s Reputation damages the Tsar •Rasputin was known for his wild and drunken behavior – orgies and romps with women that even occurred at area restaurants. •Russian nobles accused he and the Tsarina of having a love affair, or aiding the Germans in WWI as spies. A political cartoon of Rasputin’s control over the Romanovs. The Death of the “Dark One” - Rasputin Dec. 1916 - Rasputin was killed by a member of the Russian royal family. (Yussopov) He was fed cyanide laced cakes, wine that was spiked with cyanide, shot 3 times, tied up and thrown in the Neva river…Rasputin still managed to swim to the docks before dying. How did the Great War contribute to the Revolution? Military Losses/Poor Leadership Was there enough food? Who did the Tsar leave in charge? What effect did she have? The Russian Revolution The Seeds of Revolution Causes – February/March Revolutions of 1917 •Feb/March 1917 – Strikes led by 10,000 working women broke out in St. Petersburg. •The cause – the sky rocketing cost of bread and the terrible working conditions faced by factory workers. Feb-1917 -Images of protestors Looking at the date, is Russia still involved in WWI? The Russian Revolution The Seeds of Revolution February (March) Revolution -1917 •To restore order and break the strikes, Tsar Nicholas II ordered troops to shoot into the crowds. •Instead, large numbers of soldiers refused, and joined the crowds of protestors. Workers with signs in the Feb. Revolution. Workers carried signs that read, “Peace and Bread”, “Down with Autocracy.” The Russian Revolution The Effects of the February Revolution - 1917 •March 12, 1917 – The Duma met and started a Provisional Government to run Russia. •March 15, 1917 – Nicholas II stepped down, ending the 300 year long reign of the Romanov Dynasty. The Duma = Russian Parliament Meeting of the Duma, above. The Russian Revolution The Provisional Government •The Provisional Government was led by Kerensky. •His biggest mistake, insisting Russia honor her allies and stay in the Great War. •By 1917, the Russian will to fight was gone. Kerensky salutes the troops. Key Terms - Definition: Soviets •In large industrial cities such as Petrograd/St. Petersburg, and Moscow, Industrial Workers organized themselves into SOVIETS or COUNCILS. •1,000 workers = 1 representative to a soviet or council of the people. Definition: Soviets •1st Soviet met in March 1917 in Petrograd. They were made up of soldiers, workers and peasants. They were poor working class people, and as such, more radical. The Russian Revolution Vladimir Lenin – Leader of the Bolsheviks The Seeds of Revolution – Lenin •Lenin supported and spread the communist ideals of Karl Marx. •Lenin believed in violence and the radical overthrow of the government. •April 1917 – Germany shipped Lenin to Russia in the hopes that he would start a revolution that would cause Russia to exit WWI. He did… “Lenin lived, Lenin lives, Lenin will live again.” Vladimir Lenin – Bolshevik and Communist Lenin’s Bolsheviks promised the soviets the following: •He would end Russia’s participation in WWI. •Redistribute the land to peasants. •Have a committee off workers placed in charge of factories. •End the Provisional Government and place the Soviets in charge. Result - The Bolsheviks incorporated the soviets under his leadership. The Russian Revolution “Red October” – Bolshevik Revolution of October 1917 •The Bolsheviks overthrew the Provisional Government by seizing control of the Winter Palace. •Lenin and his Bolsheviks were in charge of Russia. •From 1918-1921, Russia sank into civil war between the Prov. Gov’t (Whites), and the Bolsheviks/Soviets (Reds). The Reds won. Troops outside the Winter Palace during the Oct. Revolution. Lenin and the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk •March 3, 1918 – Representatives from Lenin signed the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, ending Russia’s participation in WW I. •For leaving early - Russia ceded land to Germany, and was not allowed to send a representative to the Treaty of Versailles when the war ended in November. Questions for Review 1. What caused the February Revolution? 2. What happened as a result of the February Revolution? 3. Why would Russians have supported Lenin over the Provisional Government? 4. What did the October Revolution accomplish? 5. What impact did the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk have on Russia? The Russian Revolution The Fall of the Romanov Dynasty – July 1918 •After Tsar Nicholas abdicated the throne, he and his family were taken under guard to Yekaterinburg.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lenin and the Russian Civil War
    Lenin and the Russian Civil War In the months and years after the fall of Tsar Nicholas II’s government, Russia went through incredible, often violent changes. The society was transformed from a peasant society run by an absolute monarchy into a worker’s state run by an all- powerful group that came to be known as the Communist Party. A key to this transformation is Vladimir Lenin. Who Was Lenin? • Born into a wealthy middle-class family background. • Witnessed (when he was 17) the hanging of his brother Aleksandr for revolutionary activity. • Kicked out his university for participating in anti- Tsarist protests. • Took and passed his law exams and served in various law firms in St. Petersburg and elsewhere. • Arrested and sent to Siberia for 3 years for transporting and distributing revolutionary literature. • When WWI started, argued that it should become a revolution of the workers throughout Europe. • Released and lived mostly in exile (Switzerland) until 1917. • Adopted the name “Lenin” (he was born Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov) in exile to hide his activities from the Tsar’s secret police. Lenin and the French Revolution Lenin admired the revolutionaries in France 100 years before his time, though he believed they didn’t go far enough – too much wealth was left in middle class hands. His Bolsheviks used the chaotic and incomplete nature of the French Revolution as a guide - they believed that in order for a communist revolution to succeed, it would need firm leadership from a small group of party leaders – a very different vision from Karl Marx. So, in some ways, Lenin was like Robin Hood – taking from the rich and giving to the poor.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Terror NEVER AGAIN
    Praise for books by Nobel Peace Prize finalist R. J. Rummel "26th in a Random House poll on the best nonfiction book of the 20th Century" Random House (Modern Library) “. the most important . in the history of international relations.” John Norton Moore Professor of Law and Director, Center for National Security Law, former Chairman of the Board of Directors of the U. S. Institute of Peace “. among the most exciting . in years.” Jim Powell “. most comprehensive . I have ever encountered . illuminating . .” Storm Russell “One more home run . .” Bruce Russett, Professor of International Relations “. has profoundly affected my political and social views.” Lurner B Williams “. truly brilliant . ought to be mandatory reading.” Robert F. Turner, Professor of Law, former President of U.S. Institute of Peace ". highly recommend . ." Cutting Edge “We all walk a little taller by climbing on the shoulders of Rummel’s work.” Irving Louis Horowitz, Professor Of Sociology. ". everyone in leadership should read and understand . ." DivinePrinciple.com “. .exciting . pushes aside all the theories, propaganda, and wishful thinking . .” www.alphane.com “. world's foremost authority on the phenomenon of ‘democide.’” American Opinion Publishing “. excellent . .” Brian Carnell “. bound to be become a standard work . .” James Lee Ray, Professor of Political Science “. major intellectual accomplishment . .will be cited far into the next century” Jack Vincent, Professor of Political Science.” “. most important . required reading . .” thewizardofuz (Amazon.com) “. valuable perspective . .” R.W. Rasband “ . offers a desperately needed perspective . .” Andrew Johnstone “. eloquent . very important . .” Doug Vaughn “. should be required reading . .shocking and sobering . .” Sugi Sorensen NEVER AGAIN Book 4 Red Terror NEVER AGAIN R.J.
    [Show full text]
  • American Bolsheviki: the Beginnings of the First Red Scare, 1917 to 1918
    Steeplechase: An ORCA Student Journal Volume 3 Issue 2 Article 4 2019 American Bolsheviki: The Beginnings of the First Red Scare, 1917 to 1918 Jonathan Dunning Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.murraystate.edu/steeplechase Part of the European History Commons, Other History Commons, Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Dunning, Jonathan (2019) "American Bolsheviki: The Beginnings of the First Red Scare, 1917 to 1918," Steeplechase: An ORCA Student Journal: Vol. 3 : Iss. 2 , Article 4. Available at: https://digitalcommons.murraystate.edu/steeplechase/vol3/iss2/4 This Feature is brought to you for free and open access by the The Office of Research and Creative Activity at Murray State's Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Steeplechase: An ORCA Student Journal by an authorized editor of Murray State's Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. American Bolsheviki: The Beginnings of the First Red Scare, 1917 to 1918 Abstract A consensus has developed among historians that widespread panic consumed the American public and government as many came to fear a Bolshevik coup of the United States government and the undermining of the American way of life beginning in early 1919. Known as the First Red Scare, this period became one of the most well-known episodes of American fear of Communism in US history. With this focus on the events of 1919 to 1920, however, historians of the First Red Scare have often ignored the initial American reaction to the October Revolution in late 1917 and throughout 1918.
    [Show full text]
  • The Night Operation on the Passchendaele Ridge, 2Nd December 1917
    Centre for First World War Studies A Moonlight Massacre: The Night Operation on the Passchendaele Ridge, 2nd December 1917 by Michael Stephen LoCicero Thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of History and Cultures College of Arts & Law June 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract The Third Battle of Ypres was officially terminated by Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig with the opening of the Battle of Cambrai on 20 November 1917. Nevertheless, a comparatively unknown set-piece attack – the only large-scale night operation carried out on the Flanders front during the campaign – was launched twelve days later on 2 December. This thesis, a necessary corrective to published campaign narratives of what has become popularly known as „Passchendaele‟, examines the course of events from the mid-November decision to sanction further offensive activity in the vicinity of Passchendaele village to the barren operational outcome that forced British GHQ to halt the attack within ten hours of Zero. A litany of unfortunate decisions and circumstances contributed to the profitless result.
    [Show full text]
  • Boris Kolonitskii, “'Democracy' in the Political Consciousness of The
    "Democracy" in the Political Consciousness of the February Revolution Author(s): Boris Ivanovich Kolonitskii Source: Slavic Review, Vol. 57, No. 1 (Spring, 1998), pp. 95-106 Published by: Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2502054 . Accessed: 17/09/2013 09:58 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Slavic Review. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.197.27.9 on Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:58:33 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions "Democracy" in the Political Consciousness of the FebruaryRevolution Boris Ivanovich Kolonitskii Historians of quite diverging orientations have interpreted the Feb- ruary revolution of 1917 in Russia as a "democratic" revolution. Sev- eral generations of Marxists of various stripes (tolk) have called it a "bourgeois-democratic revolution." In the years of perestroika, the contrast between democratic February and Bolshevik October became an important part of the historical argument of the anticommunist movement. The February revolution was regarded as a dramatic, un- successful attempt at the modernization and westernization of Russia, as its democratization.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Britain. Foreign Office. Wellington House Publications
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c86m3dcm No online items Inventory of the Great Britain. Foreign Office. Wellington House publications Finding aid prepared by Trevor Wood Hoover Institution Library and Archives © 2008, 2014 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6003 [email protected] URL: http://www.hoover.org/library-and-archives Inventory of the Great Britain. XX230 1 Foreign Office. Wellington House publications Title: Great Britain. Foreign Office. Wellington House publications Date (inclusive): 1914-1918 Collection Number: XX230 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Library and Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 13 manuscript boxes, 5 card file boxes, 1 cubic foot box(6.2 Linear Feet) Abstract: Books, pamphlets, and miscellany, relating to World War I and British participation in it. Card file drawers at the Hoover Institution Library & Archives describe this collection. Hoover Institution Library & Archives Access The collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Library & Archives. Acquisition Information Acquired by the Hoover Institution Library & Archives Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Great Britain. Foreign Office. Wellington House publications, [Box no., Folder no. or title], Hoover Institution Library & Archives. Historical Note Propaganda section of the British Foreign Office. Scope and Content of Collection Books, pamphlets, and miscellany, relating to World War I and British participation in it. Subjects and Indexing Terms World War, 1914-1918 -- Propaganda Propaganda, British World War, 1914-1918 -- Great Britain box 1 "The Achievements of the Zeppelins." By a Swede.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Revolutions: the Impact and Limitations of Western Influence
    Dickinson College Dickinson Scholar Faculty and Staff Publications By Year Faculty and Staff Publications 2003 The Russian Revolutions: The Impact and Limitations of Western Influence Karl D. Qualls Dickinson College Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.dickinson.edu/faculty_publications Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Qualls, Karl D., "The Russian Revolutions: The Impact and Limitations of Western Influence" (2003). Dickinson College Faculty Publications. Paper 8. https://scholar.dickinson.edu/faculty_publications/8 This article is brought to you for free and open access by Dickinson Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Karl D. Qualls The Russian Revolutions: The Impact and Limitations of Western Influence After the collapse of the Soviet Union, historians have again turned their attention to the birth of the first Communist state in hopes of understanding the place of the Soviet period in the longer sweep of Russian history. Was the USSR an aberration from or a consequence of Russian culture? Did the Soviet Union represent a retreat from westernizing trends in Russian history, or was the Bolshevik revolution a product of westernization? These are vexing questions that generate a great deal of debate. Some have argued that in the late nineteenth century Russia was developing a middle class, representative institutions, and an industrial economy that, while although not as advanced as those in Western Europe, were indications of potential movement in the direction of more open government, rule of law, free market capitalism. Only the Bolsheviks, influenced by an ideology imported, paradoxically, from the West, interrupted this path of Russian political and economic westernization.
    [Show full text]
  • American Armies and Battlefields in Europe
    Chapter v1 THE AMERICAN BATTLEFIELDS NORTH OF PARIS chapter gives brief accounts of areas and to all of the American ceme- all American fighting whi ch oc- teries and monuments. This route is Thiscurred on the battle front north of recommended for those who desire to Paris and complete information concern- make an extended automobile tour in the ing the American military cemeteries and region. Starting from Paris, it can be monuments in that general region. The completely covered in four days, allowing military operations which are treated are plenty of time to stop on the way. those of the American lst, 27th, 30th, The accounts of the different operations 33d, 37th, 80th and 91st Divisions and and the descriptions of the American the 6th and 11 th Engineer Regiments. cemeteries and monuments are given in Because of the great distances apart of the order they are reached when following So uthern Encr ance to cb e St. Quentin Can al Tunnel, Near Bellicourc, October 1, 1918 the areas where this fighting occurred no the suggested route. For tbis reason they itinerary is given. Every operation is do not appear in chronological order. described, however, by a brief account Many American units otber tban those illustrated by a sketch. The account and mentioned in this chapter, sucb as avia- sketch together give sufficient information tion, tank, medical, engineer and infantry, to enable the tourist to plan a trip through served behind this part of the front. Their any particular American combat area. services have not been recorded, however, The general map on the next page as the space limitations of tbis chapter indicates a route wbich takes the tourist required that it be limited to those Amer- either int o or cl ose to all of tbese combat ican organizations which actually engaged (371) 372 THE AMERICAN B ATTLEFIELD S NO R TH O F PARIS Suggested Tour of American Battlefields North of Paris __ Miles Ghent ( î 37th and 91st Divisions, Ypres-Lys '"offensive, October 30-November 11, 1918 \ ( N \ 1 80th Division, Somme 1918 Albert 33d Division.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolution in Real Time: the Russian Provisional Government, 1917
    ODUMUNC 2020 Crisis Brief Revolution in Real Time: The Russian Provisional Government, 1917 ODU Model United Nations Society Introduction seventy-four years later. The legacy of the Russian Revolution continues to be keenly felt The Russian Revolution began on 8 March 1917 to this day. with a series of public protests in Petrograd, then the Winter Capital of Russia. These protests But could it have gone differently? Historians lasted for eight days and eventually resulted in emphasize the contingency of events. Although the collapse of the Russian monarchy, the rule of history often seems inventible afterwards, it Tsar Nicholas II. The number of killed and always was anything but certain. Changes in injured in clashes with the police and policy choices, in the outcome of events, government troops in the initial uprising in different players and different accidents, lead to Petrograd is estimated around 1,300 people. surprising outcomes. Something like the Russian Revolution was extremely likely in 1917—the The collapse of the Romanov dynasty ushered a Romanov Dynasty was unable to cope with the tumultuous and violent series of events, enormous stresses facing the country—but the culminating in the Bolshevik Party’s seizure of revolution itself could have ended very control in November 1917 and creation of the differently. Soviet Union. The revolution saw some of the most dramatic and dangerous political events the Major questions surround the Provisional world has ever known. It would affect much Government that struggled to manage the chaos more than Russia and the ethnic republics Russia after the Tsar’s abdication.
    [Show full text]
  • World War I Timeline C
    6.2.1 World War I Timeline c June 28, 1914 Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife Sophia are killed by Serbian nationalists. July 26, 1914 Austria declares war on Serbia. Russia, an ally of Serbia, prepares to enter the war. July 29, 1914 Austria invades Serbia. August 1, 1914 Germany declares war on Russia. August 3, 1914 Germany declares war on France. August 4, 1914 German army invades neutral Belgium on its way to attack France. Great Britain declares war on Germany. As a colony of Britain, Canada is now at war. Prime Minister Robert Borden calls for a supreme national effort to support Britain, and offers assistance. Canadians rush to enlist in the military. August 6, 1914 Austria declares war on Russia. August 12, 1914 France and Britain declare war on Austria. October 1, 1914 The first Canadian troops leave to be trained in Britain. October – November 1914 First Battle of Ypres, France. Germany fails to reach the English Channel. 1914 – 1917 The two huge armies are deadlocked along a 600-mile front of Deadlock and growing trenches in Belgium and France. For four years, there is little change. death tolls Attack after attack fails to cross enemy lines, and the toll in human lives grows rapidly. Both sides seek help from other allies. By 1917, every continent and all the oceans of the world are involved in this war. February 1915 The first Canadian soldiers land in France to fight alongside British troops. April - May 1915 The Second Battle of Ypres. Germans use poison gas and break a hole through the long line of Allied trenches.
    [Show full text]
  • Socialism in Europe and the Russian Revolution India and the Contemporary World Society Ofthefuture
    Socialism in Europe and II the Russian Revolution Chapter 1 The Age of Social Change In the previous chapter you read about the powerful ideas of freedom and equality that circulated in Europe after the French Revolution. The French Revolution opened up the possibility of creating a dramatic change in the way in which society was structured. As you have read, before the eighteenth century society was broadly divided into estates and orders and it was the aristocracy and church which controlled economic and social power. Suddenly, after the revolution, it seemed possible to change this. In many parts of the world including Europe and Asia, new ideas about individual rights and who olution controlled social power began to be discussed. In India, Raja v Rammohan Roy and Derozio talked of the significance of the French Revolution, and many others debated the ideas of post-revolutionary Europe. The developments in the colonies, in turn, reshaped these ideas of societal change. ian Re ss Not everyone in Europe, however, wanted a complete transformation of society. Responses varied from those who accepted that some change was necessary but wished for a gradual shift, to those who wanted to restructure society radically. Some were ‘conservatives’, others were ‘liberals’ or ‘radicals’. What did these terms really mean in the context of the time? What separated these strands of politics and what linked them together? We must remember that these terms do not mean the same thing in all contexts or at all times. We will look briefly at some of the important political traditions of the nineteenth century, and see how they influenced change.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Army, Vimy Ridge and the Elastic Defence in Depth in 1917
    Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 18, ISSUE 2 Studies “Lessons learned” in WWI: The German Army, Vimy Ridge and the Elastic Defence in Depth in 1917 Christian Stachelbeck The Battle of Arras in the spring of 1917 marked the beginning of the major allied offensives on the western front. The attack by the British 1st Army (Horne) and 3rd Army (Allenby) was intended to divert attention from the French main offensive under General Robert Nivelle at the Chemin des Dames (Nivelle Offensive). 1 The French commander-in-chief wanted to force the decisive breakthrough in the west. Between 9 and 12 April, the British had succeeded in penetrating the front across a width of 18 kilometres and advancing around six kilometres, while the Canadian corps (Byng), deployed for the first time in closed formation, seized the ridge near Vimy, which had been fiercely contested since late 1914.2 The success was paid for with the bloody loss of 1 On the German side, the battles at Arras between 2 April and 20 May 1917 were officially referred to as Schlacht bei Arras (Battle of Arras). In Canada, the term Battle of Vimy Ridge is commonly used for the initial phase of the battle. The seizure of Vimy ridge was a central objective of the offensive and was intended to secure the protection of the northern flank of the 3rd Army. 2 For detailed information on this, see: Jack Sheldon, The German Army on Vimy Ridge 1914-1917 (Barnsley: Pen&Sword Military, 2008), p. 8. Sheldon's book, however, is basically a largely indiscriminate succession of extensive quotes from regimental histories, diaries and force files from the Bavarian War Archive (Kriegsarchiv) in Munich.
    [Show full text]