DOCSLIB.ORG

PROTOCOL Delegation of the Government Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PROTOCOL Delegation of the Government Of Lag 1% PROTOCOL of the 29"' Negotiations between the Delegation of the Government of Greenland and the Delegation of the Russian Federation on Fishery Relations for 2021 l. In accordance with the Agreement between the Government of the Russian Federation on the one side, and the Government of Denmark and the Home Rule Government of Greenland on the other side, on ñsheries relations between the Russian Federation and Greenland signed on March 7, 1992, the 29”' Negotiations between the Delegation of the Government of Greenland and the Delegation of the Russian Federation on Fishery Relations (hereinafter referred to as “Consultations”) took place by videoconference in Moscow, the Russian Federation, and in Nuuk, Greenland, on 3-4 December, 2020. The list of delegations' participants is given in Annex l. 2. The Parties agreed on the following Agenda: Opening of session Adoption of agenda Status of ñshery resources of the Barents Sea, West and East Greenland Exchange of statistical data on catches in the Exclusive Economic Zone of the Russian Federation in the Barents Sea and in the Fishery Zone of Greenland 5. Technical regulatory measures for fish and shrimps. Unified conversion factors for fish products Discussion on ñshery results and implementation of and compliance with tishery rules. Catch logbook Consultations on Electronic Data Exchange Discussion of scientific and technical Cooperation of interest to both parties . Establishment of rnutual quotas for 2021 10. Any other business ll. Closing of session 9* FPN? '*°.°°?3 The Parties agreed to establish the following joint Working Groups: on scientific Cooperation; on monitoring and surveillance and a protocol group. 3. Status of fishery resources of the Barents Sea, West and East Greenland The Russian Party informed the Greenlandic Party of the status of stocks of the maj or commercial fish species in the Barents Sea, and noted that there is a trend towards a decrease in the ñshable and spawning stocks of North East Arctic cod and haddock, but the stocks are still above the SSBMGT. The biomass of shrimp is above MSY Btrigger, however it has declined since 2019. The Russian Party noted that there has been a reduction in the survey area of Irminger Sea pelagic redñsh. The stock is currently surveyed within less than a half of the initial survey area. The assessment of Irminger Sea pelagic redfish revised by Russian scientists, taking account of the reduced survey area, indicates that the stock is above the reference points. The assessment results were presented to ICES. The Greenlandic Party informed the Russian Party of the status of the Greenland halibut stocks in East and West Greenland, the redfish stocks in East Greenland and pelagic redfish in the Irminger Sea. The East Greenland halibut stock in total shows some signs of increase and catch rates in East Greenland are high in the Fishery Zone of Greenland. The West Greenland halibut âë stock is stable. Both stocks are fished at an appropriate level. The spawning-stock biomass (S SB) of golden redfish (Sebastes norvegicus) has increased the last decades but is declining again due to low recruitment. Fishing mortality (F) has declined in the last two decades but is still above FMsy. The ICES advice for 2021 is a little lower than in 2020, but the stock is considered to be in a good shape. The demersal redfish (Sebastes nzentella) on the Greenland slope is still at a low level and advice is unchanged from 2020. ICES advised no catch in 2021 for the pelagic redñsh stocks in the Irminger Sea. 4. Exchange of statistical data on catches in the Exclusive Economic Zone of the Russian Federation in the Barents Sea and in the Fishery Zone of Greenland The Parties exchanged their statistical data on national catches within the Exclusive Economic Zone of the Russian Federation in the Barents Sea and in the F ishery Zone of Greenland in 2019 and preliminary catch data for the year 2020 to date. For the purpose of operative control and exchange of statistical information the Parties agreed to provide, on a monthly basis, data on catch by Russian and Greenlandic fishing vessels in the zones of each other. This information should be sent by the Greenlandic Party to the Severomorskoe Territorial Department, Murmansk, fax No. + 7 8152 798l26e-mail: [email protected], and to the Murmansk Branch of FGFI “Centre of Fishery Monitoring and Communication” by e-mail: [email protected], and by the Russian Party to the Greenland Fisheries Licence Control (GFLK), Nuuk, Greenland to fax No. +299 346063, e-mail: [email protected] and to the Greenland Coastguard to fax +29936 40 99, e-mail:[email protected]. Greenlandic vessels fishing under Russian quotas transferred to the Norwegian Economic Zone shall inforrn the Severomorskoe Territorial Department on a Weekly basis about their entries, exits and catch in the Norwegian Economic Zone. The Russian Party noted that reports sent by masters of Greenlandic vessels must include catches taken only under the Russian quota. There should be no aggregated catch under Russian and Norwegian quotas in the reports. The Parties agreed that any catch reports submitted by Greenlandic vessels shall contain the number of the Russian permit/licence to han/est (fish) aquatic biological resources under which the catch has been taken when they fish inside or outside the Exclusive Economic Zone of the Russian Federation. Non-compliance with such reporting requirements shall be considered as an infringement. The Greenlandic Party informed that for the purpose of compliance by Greenlandic vessels with the procedure for reporting the catch of aquatic biological resources under the quota allocated by the Russian Party, the relevant requirement will be stipulated in fishing permits issued by the Greenlandic Party when licensing its own vessels. For the Convenience of masters of Greenlandic ñshing vessels in sending catch reports when they fish the Russian quota, the Russian Party proposed to use the “Catch Report when ñshing inside the EEZ of the Russian Federation” and “Catch Report when ñshing Russian quota outside the Russian EEZ” forms (Annexes 5 and 6). 5. Technical regulator-y measures for fish and shrimp. Unified conversion factors for fish products For the Exclusive Economic Zone of the Russian Federation: Cod and haddock Sorting grids are mandatory for use in cod and haddock trawl ñsheries in the Exclusive Economic Zone of the Russian Federation in the Barents Sea. The applied Sorting grids must be in confonnity with technical specifications established earlier on the basis of the minimal distance between bars of 55 mm. It is allowed to use ñne-meshed netting and materials for guiding parts of Sorting grids. The unified minimum mesh size of bottom trawls in cod and haddock Fisheries in the entire area of their distribution is 130 mm. The minimum fish sizes are as follows: 44 cm for cod and 40 cm for haddock. A total by-catch of cod, haddock and saithe below the minimum fish size is allowed of up to 15% of the total number of cod, haddock and saithe from each individual haul. Decision on closing or opening of ñshing areas shall become effective 7 days after the Parties have notiñed each other of the decision. Decision on the closing or opening shall immediately enter into force for vessels, which receive information on the decision directly from responsible authorities. It is forbidden to use mid-water trawls in cod ñshery. Before the end of the day it is allowed to make corrections of records in a catch logbook relating to the previous day. Northern Shrimp A minimum mesh size in bottom trawls used in Northern shrimp ñsheries is 35 mm. The use of Sorting grid with a maximum bar spacing of l9 mm is mandatory in all cases of ñshing for Northern shrimp in the Exclusive Economic Zone of the Russian Federation. It is allowed to use a reinforcement net on trawls when fishing for Northern shrimps provided that the mesh size of chafer is not less than 80 mm. A by-catch of juvenile cod in Northern Shrimp ñshery should not exceed a total of 800 individuals per l tonne of Northern Shrimp; by-catch of juvenile haddock should not exceed 2000 individuals per l tonne of Northern shrimp. A by-catch of juvenile redfish should not exceed 300 individuals per l tonne of shrimp. A by-catch of juvenile Greenland halibut shall not exceed 300 individuals per 1 tonne of Northern shrimp. A decision on the closing or opening of ñshing areas shall become effective 7 days after the Parties have notiñed each other of the decision. Decision on the closing or opening shall immediately come into force for vessels, which receive information on the decision directly from responsible authorities. Before the day ends it is allowed to make corrections of records in a Fishing logbook relating to the previous day. ÆC Areas and periods of closure: It is prohibited during the year to use trawling gears in the area conñned within straight lines drawn across the points of the following positions: 7I°00' N 43°00' E 71°00' N 40°30' E 7l°30' N 40°30' E 7l°30' N 43°00' E and further to until the starting point. It is prohibited during the year to use bottom trawls in the area conñned within straight lines drawn across the points of the following positions: 68°55' N - 37°00' E; 69°25' N - 37°00' E; 69°25' N - 39°00' E; 69°50' N - 39°00' E; 69°50' N - 43°00' E; 69°10' N - 43°O0' E; 69°l0' N - 40°30' E; 68°40' N - 40°30' E; 68°40' N - 39°00' E; 68°30' N - 39°00' E; 68°30' N - 38°l5' E and further to until the starting point.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sheep Farming As “An Arduous Livelihood”
    University of Alberta Cultivating Place, Livelihood, and the Future: An Ethnography of Dwelling and Climate in Western Greenland by Naotaka Hayashi A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Anthropology ©Naotaka Hayashi Spring 2013 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission. Abstract In order to investigate how Inuit Greenlanders in western Greenland are experiencing, responding to, and thinking about recent allegedly human-induced climate change, this dissertation ethnographically examines the lives of Greenlanders as well as Norse and Danes in the course of past historical natural climate cycles. My emphasis is on human endeavours to cultivate a future in the face of difficulties caused by climatic and environmental transformation. I recognize locals’ initiatives to carve out a future in the promotion of sheep farming and tree-planting in southern Greenland and in adaptation processes of northern Greenlandic hunters to the ever-shifting environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Partnership Agreement Between the European Community
    L 172/4EN Official Journal of the European Union 30.6.2007 FISHERIES PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT between the European Community on the one hand, and the Government of Denmark and the Home Rule Government of Greenland, on the other hand THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Community’), and THE GOVERNMENT OF DENMARK AND THE HOME RULE GOVERNMENT OF GREENLAND, (hereinafter referred to as ‘Greenland’), (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Parties’), HAVING REGARD to the Protocol on the special arrangement applicable to Greenland, RECOGNISING that the European Community and Greenland wish to strengthen the links between them and to establish a partnership and a cooperation which would support, complement and extend the relations and cooperation established between them in the past, RECALLING the Council decision of November 2001 on the association of the overseas countries and territories with the European Community, TAKING ACCOUNT of the recognition by the Council in February 2003 of the need to broaden and strengthen the future relations between the European Community and Greenland, taking into account the importance of fisheries and the need for structural and sector oriented reforms in Greenland based on a comprehensive partnership for sustainable development, TAKING ACCOUNT of the Joint Declaration of 27 June 2006 by the European Community on one hand and the Home Rule Government of Greenland and the Government of Denmark on the other on partnership between the European Community and Greenland, RECALLING the Council Decision of
    [Show full text]
  • FLAG of GREENLAND - a BRIEF HISTORY Where in the World
    Part of the “History of National Flags” Series from Flagmakers FLAG OF GREENLAND - A BRIEF HISTORY Where In The World Trivia The Flag of Greenland is the only Nordic country that doesn’t feature a Nordic cross. Technical Specification Adopted: 21st June 1985 Proportion: 2:3 Design: A red and white horizontal bicolour with an off-centre, counter-changed disk. Colours: PMS – Red: 186c Brief History Prior to 1983 Greenland was a Danish colony since 1814. The flag during this time as the red field with white cross Danish flag. The Danish flag is still flown side-by-side the Flag of Greenland. In 1973 a flag for Greenland was proposed, it featured a green field with white blue-bordered Nordic cross. However it never became official. The Flag of Denmark The first proposed Flag of Greenland (1814 – 1983) (1973) It wasn’t till 1984 that a second flag specific to Greenland was proposed by Sven Tito Achen and seriously considered and featured a green field with white Nordic cross. It narrowly lost out to the modern flag when Greenland gained independence. The modern flag of independent Greenland designed by Thue Christiansen was adopted after its independence in 1985. It features a red-white horizontal bicolour with a off-centre, counter-changed disk. The locals call it ‘Erfalasorput’, meaning ‘our flag’. The Proposed Flag of Greenland The Flag of Greenland (1984) (1985 to Present Day) The Coat of Arms of Greenland The Coat of Arms of Greenland was adopted in 1989 and features a blue shield with white polar bear, which is the symbol of Greenland.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Copenhagen Amager
    Local Knowledge, Sustainability and Visionscapes in Greenland Sejersen, Frank Publication date: 2002 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: Unspecified Citation for published version (APA): Sejersen, F. (2002). Local Knowledge, Sustainability and Visionscapes in Greenland. Afdeling for Eskimologi og arktiske studier, Københavns Universitet. Download date: 28. sep.. 2021 Local knowledge, Sustainability and Visionscapes in Greenland Frank Sejersen Eskimologis Skrifter, nr. 17 Københavns Universitet 2002 Copyright © 2002 Frank Sejersen and Department of Eskimology ISBN: 87-87874-20-2 ISSN: 1601-9385 Printed by Kopi Service, University of Copenhagen Amager The present project has received financial support from the Danish Environmental Protection Agency as part of the environmental support program Dancea – Danish Cooperation for Environment in the Arctic. The author is solely responsible for all results and conclusions presented in the report, and they do not necessarily reflect the position of the Danish Environmental Protection Agency. To order this publication please contact: Department of Eskimology, University of Copenhagen Strandgade 100H, DK 1401 Copenhagen K, Denmark +45 32 88 01 60 (phone) / +45 32 88 01 61 (fax) www.hum.ku.dk/eskimo / [email protected] Contents Preface 1 Introduction 4 Knowledge and the interface between Man and the Environment 6 Knowledge and the interface between local, national and international institutions 7 Knowledge and the interface between users and scientists
    [Show full text]
  • Specific Flag Days
    Specific flag days Country/Territory/Continent Date Details Afghanistan August 19 Independence day, 1919. Albania November 28 Independence day, 1912. Anniversary of the death of Manuel Belgrano, who created the Argentina June 20 current flag. Aruba March 18 Flag day. Adoption of the national flag on March 18, 1976. Australian National Flag Day commemorates the first flying of Australia September 3 the Australian National Flag in 1901. State Flag Day, was officially established in 2009, for the Azerbaijan November 9 commemoration of the adoption of the Flag of Azerbaijan on November 9, 1918. Åland Last Sunday of April Commemorates adoption of the Åland flag Flag Day in Bolivia. Commemorates of the creation of the first August 17 Bolivia national flag. Brazil November 19 Flag Day in Brazil; adopted in 1889 Canada National Flag of Canada Day commemorates adoption of the February 15 Canadian flag, Feb. 15, 1965. January 21[4][5] Québec Flag Day (French: Jour du Drapeau) commemorates Quebec the first flying of the flag of Quebec, January 21, 1948. July 20 Declaration of Independence (1810) (Celebrated as National Colombia August 7 Day); Battle of Boyaca (1819) Dia di Bandera ("Day of the Flag"). Adoption of the national July 2 Curaçao flag on 2 July 1984. Anniversary of the Battle of Valdemar in 1219 in Lyndanisse, Estonia, where according to legend, the ("Dannebrog") fell Denmark June 15 from the sky. It is also the anniversary of the return of North Slesvig in 1920 to Denmark following the post-World War I plebiscite. "Day of the National Flag" ("Dia de la Bandera Nacional").
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of UNESCO's Action to Revitalize and Promote Indigenous
    INTERNAL OVERSIGHT SERVICE Evaluation Office INTERNAL OVERSIGHT SERVICE Evaluation Office i Management Response INTERNAL OVERSIGHT SERVICE United Nations Educational, Scientific and Evaluation Office Cultural Organization EVALUATION OF UNESCO’S ACTION TO REVITALIZE AND PROMOTE INDIGENOUS LANGUAGES Within the framework of the International Year of Indigenous Languages March 2021 IOS/EVS/PI/194 ©Shutterstock /Monkey©Shutterstock Business Images ii Commissioning Office: UNESCO Internal Oversight Service (IOS), Evaluation Office Ekaterina Sediakina Rivière, Evaluation Manager, UNESCO Evaluation Office Martyna Wanat, Evaluation Consultant, UNESCO Evaluation Office Authors: Claire Thomas, Lydia van de Fliert, Oliver Loode, Silvia Quattrini, Mihaela Cojocaru Minority Rights Group International Indigenous Advisory Committee members: Africa: Dr. Mariam Wallet Aboubakrine and Nouha Grine; Arctic: Aluki Kotierk; Asia: Dr. Maung Nyeu; Eastern Europe, Russia and Transcaucasia: Dimitry Harakka-Zaytsev; North America: Dr. Wesley Leonard; South, Central America and Caribbean: Irma Pineda Santiago. Professor Ghil’ad Zuckermann. Chair of Linguistics and Endangered Languages, University of Adelaide, provided linguistic advice and Dr. Wesley Leonard shared an analysis of the key concepts of the International Year of Indigenous Languages 2019 and the International Decade of International Languages 2022-2023 to inform the evaluation. Evaluation Reference Group Members: Irmgarda Kasinskaite, Coordinator IYIL2019, UNESCO Communication and Information (CI) Sector
    [Show full text]
  • Official Journal L 209
    ISSN 0378-6978 Official Journal L 209 Volume 44 of the European Communities 2 August 2001 English edition Legislation Contents I Acts whose publication is obligatory Council Regulation (EC) No 1575/2001 of 25 June 2001 on the conclusion of the Fourth Protocol laying down the conditions relating to fishing provided for in the Agreement on fisheries between the European Economic Community, on the one hand, and the Government of Denmark and the local Government of Greenland, on the other ..................................................................................................... 1 Fourth Protocol laying down the conditions relating to fishing provided for in the Agree- ment on fisheries between the European Economic Community, on the one hand, and the Government of Denmark and the Home Rule Government of Greenland, on the other ......... 2 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1576/2001 of 1 August 2001 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables .................. 10 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1577/2001 of 1 August 2001 amending Regula- tion (EC) No 296/96 on data to be transmitted by the Member States and the monthly booking of expenditure financed under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) ............................ 12 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1578/2001 of 1 August 2001 determining the sensitive production areas and/or the groups of high-quality varieties exempt from application of the quota buyback programme in raw tobacco ....................... 13 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1579/2001 of 1 August 2001 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An International Relations Analysis of a Post-Independence Inuit Nation
    The Greenlandic Question: An International Relations Analysis of a Post-Independence Inuit Nation Ever since the re-founding[1] of Greenland in 1721 when Lutheran ministers were sent to convert the Greenlanders to Protestantism, Greenland has been under the Danish realm due to the legal concept of terra nullius.[2] Over the centuries, Greenlandic sovereignty has been an issue, but only very recently with respect to the Inuit, the indigenous people of Greenland. One of the most important cases regarding Greenland’s sovereignty, the Eastern Greenland case of 1933,[3] was a disagreement between Norway building a radio station on what the Danes considered to be their territory. The only reference to the Inuit was in dicta, considering them objects needing protection of a civilized state, giving their welfare to the Danish realm without considering their wishes.[4] Since that time, however, Greenland has gained steps toward independence from the Kingdom of Denmark via the U.N. Charter in 1945, which promotes self-government,[5] Home Rule in 1979, and finally self-government in 2009. The logical next step is independence, when Greenland is no longer reliant on the annual Danish block grant, and its economy stable and diversified. This would be the first time in which an indigenous-majority country would exist. This begs the question: what type of State would this nation be? Would it fall into its former colonial master’s ways of realism and adopt a Westphalian attitude or would it continue to function within the “social institutions or set of rules guiding the behavior of those engaged in identifiable social practices,”[6] such as the ICC, which plays such a large role in Inuit identity? Perhaps they could even create a yet unseen hybrid governance system.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustaible Fisheries Partnership Agreement
    SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF GREENLAND AND THE GOVERNMENT OF DENMARK, OF THE ONE PART, AND THE EUROPEAN UNION, OF THE OTHER PART GL/DK/EU/en 1 THE GOVERNMENT OF GREENLAND and THE GOVERNMENT OF DENMARK, hereinafter referred to as "Greenland", both hereinafter referred to as the "Parties", and THE EUROPEAN UNION, hereinafter referred to as "the Union", HAVING REGARD to the Protocol on special arrangements for Greenland, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, RECOGNISING that the Union and Greenland wish to strengthen the links between them and to establish a partnership and cooperation which would support, complement and extend the relations and cooperation established between them in the past, RECALLING the recognition by the Council in February 2003 of the need to broaden and strengthen the future relations between the European Union and Greenland, taking into account the importance of fisheries and the need for structural and sector-oriented reforms in Greenland based on a comprehensive partnership for sustainable development, GL/DK/EU/en 2 RECALLING Council Decision 2013/755/EU of 25 November 2013 on the association of the overseas countries and territories with the European Union ("Overseas Association Decision")1, RECALLING Council Decision 2014/137/EU of 14 March 2014 on relations between the European Union on the one hand, and Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark on the other2, TAKING ACCOUNT of the Joint Declaration of 19 March 2015
    [Show full text]
  • Colours, Crosses Or Cow-Horns? Nordic Elements in the Design Of
    Colours, crosses or cow-horns? Nordic elements in the design of some North American flags and emblems with an overview of the use of Scandinavian flags in Canada and the U.S.A. Kevin Harrington Abstract This Canadian vexillologist introduces the historical and contemporary uses of Scandinavian flags in North America. He proceeds to analyze the design of North American flags that have some tie-in with the five Nordic countries. Certain individuals of Scandinavian descent who had a role in North American vexillology are also identified. The writer looks at organizational and institutional flags and emblems, house flags , sports pennants and banners, sailing and yacht club burgees, and private signals of mariners, as well as a few civic flags of Canada and the United States. He counts the frequency ofNordic elements chosen in the designs of these flags and draw appropriate conclusions. Introduction The Nordic countries of Iceland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and Finland have made many significant contributions to North American history, geography, and civiliza­ tion- from Leif Ericsson to Otto Sverdrup, from New Sweden to Little Norway, from kringles to saunas, from farmers in the Dakotas to lumbermen in Thunder Bay, from pdtissiers in Toronto to fishermen on Lake Winnipeg, from Ole Edvart Rolvaag to Martha Ostenso, from Karen Magnusson to Matts Sundin, an import on an National Hockey League team. To these - and there are several other categories of contribu­ tions -we now add those in the field of vexillology and emblematics. By the words Norden or Nordic, this writer means 'the northern European countries commonly re­ ferred to as Scandinavia but including also Iceland and Finland.' By Nordic elements we mean the arrangements, charges, and colours of the Nordic flags, and design ele­ ments of heraldic, dynastic, sigillographic, artistic, and other historic derivations.
    [Show full text]
  • L 172 Official Journal
    ISSN 1725-2555 Official Journal L 172 of the European Union Volume 50 English edition Legislation 30 June 2007 Contents I Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory REGULATIONS ★ Council Regulation (EC) No 753/2007 of 28 June 2007 on the conclusion of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community on the one hand, and the Government of Denmark and the Home Rule Government of Greenland, on the other hand 1 Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community on the one hand, and the Government of Denmark and the Home Rule Government of Greenland, on the other hand ........................ 4 Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community on the one hand, and the Government of Denmark and the Home Rule Government of Greenland, on the other hand ........................... 9 ★ Council Regulation (EC) No 754/2007 of 28 June 2007 amending Regulations (EC) No 1941/2006, (EC) No 2015/2006 and (EC) No 41/2007, as regards fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks ............................................... 26 Commission Regulation (EC) No 755/2007 of 29 June 2007 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables ...................................... 39 ★ Commission Regulation (EC) No 756/2007 of 29 June 2007 amending Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables ......................................................................................... 41 ★ Commission Regulation (EC) No 757/2007 of 29 June 2007 concerning the permanent authorisation of certain additives in feedingstuffs (1) ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Making Marketable and Artisan Gemstones Nathalia Brichet
    A Piece of Greenland? Making Marketable and Artisan Gemstones Nathalia Brichet ABSTRACT This article explores the emergence of a Greenlandic mineral resource landscape against the background of the current establish- ment of an industrial ruby mine in Greenland. Anthropological field- work combined with a close reading of scientific reports, articles, and geological assessments about Greenlandic gemstones show a recurrent feature, namely that Greenlandic minerals get scaled and valued in ambiguous ways. This ambiguity is telling of a type of Danish (post-)colonial activity, even if such geological mapping was and is motivated by a dream of welfare, development, and economic sustainability shared by Danish experts and Greenlandic politicians alike. An overall point is to argue that the very practice of describing mineral resources also configures their perceived value and posits a yardstick by which to measure their potential. KEYWORDS handicraft, (post)-colonialism, rubies, small-scale mining, tugtupite, value, Denmark Introduction: A Greenlandic Gemstone Landscape in the Making In 1605, the king of Denmark-Norway sponsored three ships to explore the Greenlandic coast in response to rumours of mountains of silver and gold. The disappointment was huge among the royal inves- tors when the ships returned with a cargo of pyrite, also called fool’s gold. This early dream of an unexplored Arctic Eldorado beyond Europe has lived on in various forms. Since 2004, exploration activi- ties leading to the establishment of a new ruby mine in Greenland have attracted the attention of geologists, administrators, policy-mak- ers, investors, and local treasure hunters who work in different ways to develop the gem industry in the country.
    [Show full text]