FLAG of GREENLAND - a BRIEF HISTORY Where in the World

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Part of the “History of National Flags” Series from Flagmakers FLAG OF GREENLAND - A BRIEF HISTORY Where In The World Trivia The Flag of Greenland is the only Nordic country that doesn’t feature a Nordic cross. Technical Specification Adopted: 21st June 1985 Proportion: 2:3 Design: A red and white horizontal bicolour with an off-centre, counter-changed disk. Colours: PMS – Red: 186c Brief History Prior to 1983 Greenland was a Danish colony since 1814. The flag during this time as the red field with white cross Danish flag. The Danish flag is still flown side-by-side the Flag of Greenland. In 1973 a flag for Greenland was proposed, it featured a green field with white blue-bordered Nordic cross. However it never became official. The Flag of Denmark The first proposed Flag of Greenland (1814 – 1983) (1973) It wasn’t till 1984 that a second flag specific to Greenland was proposed by Sven Tito Achen and seriously considered and featured a green field with white Nordic cross. It narrowly lost out to the modern flag when Greenland gained independence. The modern flag of independent Greenland designed by Thue Christiansen was adopted after its independence in 1985. It features a red-white horizontal bicolour with a off-centre, counter-changed disk. The locals call it ‘Erfalasorput’, meaning ‘our flag’. The Proposed Flag of Greenland The Flag of Greenland (1984) (1985 to Present Day) The Coat of Arms of Greenland The Coat of Arms of Greenland was adopted in 1989 and features a blue shield with white polar bear, which is the symbol of Greenland. The government of Greenland uses the Coat of Arms as their personal symbol. This coat of arms also represents the Danish Royal Family and was originally introduced in the Coat of Arms of Denmark in 1666. Examples of Other Proposed Flags of Greenland Here are two more examples of the proposed flags of Greenland. 3rd Proposal 1991 Proposed Flag The Symbol of the Danish Defence Force The Danish defence force still defends Greenland. The Symbol of the Danish Defence force features a crowned Danish flag and grey circle split into three parts. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Memorandum of the Secretariat General on the European Flag Pacecom003137
DE L'EUROPE - COUNCIL OF EDMFE Consultative Assembly Confidential Strasbourg,•15th July, 1951' AS/RPP II (3) 2 COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PROCEDURE AND PRIVILEGES Sub-Committee on Immunities I MEMORANDUM OF THE SECRETARIAT GENERAL ON THE EUROPEAN FLAG PACECOM003137 1.- The purpose of an Emblem There are no ideals, however exalted in nature, which can afford to do without a symbol. Symbols play a vital part in the ideological struggles of to-day. Ever since there first arose the question of European, organisation, a large number of suggestions have more particularly been produced in its connection, some of which, despite their shortcomings, have for want of anything ;. better .been employed by various organisations and private ' individuals. A number of writers have pointed out how urgent and important it is that a symbol should be adopted, and the Secretariat-General has repeatedly been asked to provide I a description of the official emblem of the Council of Europe and has been forced to admit that no such emblem exists. Realising the importance of the matter, a number of French Members of Parliament^ have proposed in the National Assembly that the symbol of the European Movement be flown together with the national flag on public buildings. Private movements such as'the Volunteers of Europe have also been agitating for the flying of the European Movement colours on the occasion of certain French national celebrations. In Belgium the emblem of the European Movement was used during the "European Seminar of 1950" by a number of *•*: individuals, private organisations and even public institutions.
[Show full text]
FORT FREDERIK Other Name/Site Nu
NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 FORT FREDERIK Page 1 United States Department of tHe Interior, National ParK Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: FORT FREDERIK Other Name/Site Number: Frederiksfort 2. LOCATION Street & Number: South of junction of Mahonany Road and Route 631, Not for publication: N/A North end of Frederiksted City/Town: Frederiksted Vicinity: N/A State: US Virgin Islands County: St. Croix Code: 010 Zip Code: 00840 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: Building(s): X Public-Local: District: Public-State: X Site: Public-Federal: Structure: Object: Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 2 buildings 1 sites structures 1 objects 3 1 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 2 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: N/A NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 FORT FREDERIK Page 2 United States Department of tHe Interior, National ParK Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this ____ nomination ____ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ____ meets ____ does not meet the National Register Criteria.
[Show full text]
Executive Office of the Governor Flag Protocol
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR FLAG PROTOCOL Revised 9/26/2012 The Florida Department of State is the custodian of the official State of Florida Flag and maintains a Flag Protocol and Display web page at http://www.dos.state.fl.us/office/admin-services/flag-main.aspx. The purposes of the Flag Protocol of the Executive Office of the Governor are to outline the procedures regarding the lowering of the National and State Flags to half-staff by directive; to provide information regarding the display of special flags; and to answer frequently asked questions received in this office about flag protocol. Please direct any questions, inquires, or comments to the Office of the General Counsel: By mail: Executive Office of the Governor Office of the General Counsel 400 South Monroe Street The Capitol, Room 209 Tallahassee, FL 32399 By phone: 850.717.9310 By email: [email protected] By web: www.flgov.com/flag-alert/ Revised 9/26/2012 NATIONAL AND STATE FLAG POLICY By order of the President of the United States, the National Flag shall be flown at half-staff upon the death of principal figures of the United States government and the governor of a state, territory, or possession, as a mark of respect to their memory. In the event of the death of other officials or foreign dignitaries, the flag is to be flown at half-staff according to presidential instructions or orders, in accordance with recognized customs or practices not inconsistent with law. (4 U.S.C. § 7(m)). The State Flag shall be flown at half-staff whenever the National Flag is flown at half-staff.
[Show full text]
THE LION FLAG Norway's First National Flag Jan Henrik Munksgaard
THE LION FLAG Norway’s First National Flag Jan Henrik Munksgaard On 27 February 1814, the Norwegian Regent Christian Frederik made a proclamation concerning the Norwegian flag, stating: The Norwegian flag shall henceforth be red, with a white cross dividing the flag into quarters. The national coat of arms, the Norwegian lion with the yellow halberd, shall be placed in the upper hoist corner. All naval and merchant vessels shall fly this flag. This was Norway’s first national flag. What was the background for this proclamation? Why should Norway have a new flag in 1814, and what are the reasons for the design and colours of this flag? The Dannebrog Was the Flag of Denmark-Norway For several hundred years, Denmark-Norway had been in a legislative union. Denmark was the leading party in this union, and Copenhagen was the administrative centre of the double monarchy. The Dannebrog had been the common flag of the whole realm since the beginning of the 16th century. The red flag with a white cross was known all over Europe, and in every shipping town the citizens were familiar with this symbol of Denmark-Norway. Two variants of The Dannebrog existed: a swallow-tailed flag, which was the king’s flag or state flag flown on government vessels and buildings, and a rectangular flag for private use on ordinary merchant ships or on private flagpoles. In addition, a number of special flags based on the Dannebrog existed. The flag was as frequently used and just as popular in Norway as in Denmark. The Napoleonic Wars Result in Political Changes in Scandinavia At the beginning of 1813, few Norwegians could imagine dissolution of the union with Denmark.
[Show full text]
Vexillum, June 2018, No. 2
Research and news of the North American Vexillological Association June 2018 No. Recherche et nouvelles de l’Association nord-américaine de vexillologie Juin 2018 2 INSIDE Page Editor’s Note 2 President’s Column 3 NAVA Membership Anniversaries 3 The Flag of Unity in Diversity 4 Incorporating NAVA News and Flag Research Quarterly Book Review: "A Flag Worth Dying For: The Power and Politics of National Symbols" 7 New Flags: 4 Reno, Nevada 8 The International Vegan Flag 9 Regional Group Report: The Flag of Unity Chesapeake Bay Flag Association 10 Vexi-News Celebrates First Anniversary 10 in Diversity Judge Carlos Moore, Mississippi Flag Activist 11 Stamp Celebrates 200th Anniversary of the Flag Act of 1818 12 Captain William Driver Award Guidelines 12 The Water The Water Protectors: Native American Nationalism, Environmentalism, and the Flags of the Dakota Access Pipeline Protectors Protests of 2016–2017 13 NAVA Grants 21 Evolutionary Vexillography in the Twenty-First Century 21 13 Help Support NAVA's Upcoming Vatican Flags Book 23 NAVA Annual Meeting Notice 24 Top: The Flag of Unity in Diversity Right: Demonstrators at the NoDAPL protests in January 2017. Source: https:// www.indianz.com/News/2017/01/27/delay-in- nodapl-response-points-to-more.asp 2 | June 2018 • Vexillum No. 2 June / Juin 2018 Number 2 / Numéro 2 Editor's Note | Note de la rédaction Dear Reader: We hope you enjoyed the premiere issue of Vexillum. In addition to offering my thanks Research and news of the North American to the contributors and our fine layout designer Jonathan Lehmann, I owe a special note Vexillological Association / Recherche et nouvelles de l’Association nord-américaine of gratitude to NAVA members Peter Ansoff, Stan Contrades, Xing Fei, Ted Kaye, Pete de vexillologie.
[Show full text]
Commission Report Final UK
JOINT COMMISSION ON VEXILLOGRAPHIC PRINCIPLES of The Flag Institute and North American Vexillological Association ! ! THE COMMISSION’S REPORT ON THE GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF FLAG DESIGN 1st October 2014 These principles have been adopted by The Flag Institute and North American Vexillological Association | Association nord-américaine de vexillologie, based on the recommendations of a Joint Commission convened by Charles Ashburner (Chief Executive, The Flag Institute) and Hugh Brady (President, NAVA). The members of the Joint Commission were: Graham M.P. Bartram (Chairman) Edward B. Kaye Jason Saber Charles A. Spain Philip S. Tibbetts Introduction This report attempts to lay out for the public benefit some basic guidelines to help those developing new flags for their communities and organizations, or suggesting refinements to existing ones. Flags perform a very powerful function and this best practice advice is intended to help with optimising the ability of flags to fulfil this function. The principles contained within it are only guidelines, as for each “don’t do this” there is almost certainly a flag which does just that and yet works. An obvious example would be item 3.1 “fewer colours”, yet who would deny that both the flag of South Africa and the Gay Pride Flag work well, despite having six colours each. An important part of a flag is its aesthetic appeal, but as the the 18th century Scottish philosopher, David Hume, wrote, “Beauty in things exists merely in the mind which contemplates them.” Different cultures will prefer different aesthetics, so a general set of principles, such as this report, cannot hope to cover what will and will not work aesthetically.
[Show full text]
The Holy See
The Holy See Coat of Arms of His Holiness Benedict XVI Armour bearings have been in common use by soldiers and the nobility since the Middle Ages. This has given rise to a very specific heraldic language to regulate and describe civic heraldry. At the same time, an ecclesiastical heraldry for clergy also developed. This heraldic usage follows exactly the same rules as civic heraldry with regard to the composition and definition of the shield, but surrounds it with religious or Church symbols and emblems according to one's ecclesiastical rank in Holy Orders, jurisdiction and dignity. There is an at least 800-year-old tradition for Popes to have their own personal coat of arms, in addition to the symbols proper to the Apostolic See. Particularly during the Renaissance and the centuries that followed, it was customary to mark with the arms of the reigning Supreme Pontiff all his principal works. Indeed, Papal coats of arms appear on buildings and in various publications, 2 decrees and documents. Popes often used their family shield or composed their own with symbols indicating their ideal of life or referring to past events or experiences, or even elements connected with specific Pontifical programmes. At times, they even added a variant to a shield that they had adopted on becoming a Bishop. Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, elected Pope and taking the name Benedict XVI, has chosen a coat of arms rich in symbolism and meaning that transmits to history his personality and Pontificate. A coat of arms consists of a shield bearing several important symbols and surrounded by elements that indicate the person's dignity, rank, title, jurisdiction and more.
[Show full text]
How the Colonies Were Actually Governed
1 THE DANISH WEST INDIES UNDER COMPANY RULE (1671-1754) INTRODUCTION: GEOGRAPHICAL AND HISTORICAL If Belgium has been described, and not inaccurately, as “the cockpit of Europe,” the West Indies may be regarded as “the cockpit” of sea power. The islands and mainland of the Caribbean and Gulf regions have been among the prizes for which European states have contended in practically every war of consequence that has been fought during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Just why Spaniards, Frenchmen and Englishmen, Dutchmen and Danes, Swedes and Brandenburgers, and even Knights of Malta and Courlanders, should all at one time or another have directed their energies to West Indian commerce and commercial exploitation is a question that very few, beyond a limited number of specialists, are able intelligently to answer. The heterogeneous character of the West Indian political map of to-day has behind it an interesting story, and one thoroughly worth studying, for those who wish to grasp understandingly the reasons for European interest in America before Spain lost her various American Colonies on the mainland. So far as the immediate effects upon Europe were concerned, the beating back of the Spanish frontier in the Caribbean regions by Spain’s commercial rivals was far more important at the time than the distant frontier struggles of Spaniards, Frenchmen, and Englishmen on the mainland of America. The present study is an attempt to separate from the tangled skein of West Indian history the single small thread that concerns the early efforts of Denmark-Norway to establish itself in those distant regions.
[Show full text]
Tenri Journal of Religion
ISSN 0495-1492 TENRI JOURNAL OF RELIGION MARCH 2021 NUMBER 49 OYASATO INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF RELIGION TENRI UNIVERSITY TENRI UNIVERSITY PRESS TENRI, JAPAN © 2021 by Tenri University Press TENRI JOURNAL OF RELIGION MARCH 2021 NUMBER 49 CONTENTS Noriaki NAGAO : What It Means to Have a Dialogue with Others Towards the Realization of Peaceful Sociaty .............. 1 Yoshitsugu SAWAI : The Words of the Scriptures and Their Signifcance: From the Standpint of Tenrikyo Theology ........ 23 Takayuki ONOUE : Shōzen Nakayama’s 1933 North American Mission Tour and Japanese Immigrant Communities ...... 39 Book Review Yoshitsugu SAWAI : Michael Pye, ed., Exploring Shinto.................................71 The Contributors.............................................................................................75 Editor’s notes 1. Wherever possible, quotations from the Scriptures of Tenrikyo—the Ofudesaki (The Tip of the Writing Brush), the Mikagura-uta (The Songs for the Service), and the Osashizu (The Divine Directions)—are taken from the latest editions of the official translations provided by Tenrikyo Church Headquarters. In cases where the author cites material from the Osashizu that is not contained in offcially approved English-language sources such as Selections from the Osashizu, a trial translation prepared by the author or translator is used. 2.1. The Foundress of Tenrikyo, Miki Nakayama, is referred to by Tenrikyo followers as “Oyasama” and written as 教祖 in Japanese. 2.2. The Honseki ( 本席 ) or the Seki ( 席 ) refers to Izō Iburi, who delivered the Osashizu, the Divine Directions, and granted the Sazuke. 2.3. The one who governs Tenrikyo shall be the Shinbashira ( 真柱 ). The first Shinbashira was Shinnosuke Nakayama, the second Shinbashira Shōzen Nakayama, and the third Shinbashira Zenye Nakayama, who was succeeded in 1998 by Zenji Nakayama.
[Show full text]
Griffintayle-Aug-2003
*5,)),T7"=/( Newsletter of the Barony of Politarchopolis August AS38 “Fraudem! Fraudem! Mea pecunia vobis redenda est!” Griffintayle is published by and for the Barony of Politarchopolis. It is not a corporate publication of the Society for Creative Anachronism and does not delineate SCA policy. Griffintayle is produced by Anwyn Davies Griffintayle has a limited free distribution. Secure your postal copy by subscription - $8.00 per year. Baronial Homepage: http://www.sca.org.au/politarchopolis/ Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 10 11 12 13 14 15 Booking price for 16 Guild Day, St. O ~o dPO Crusade, Borderscros, Florians goes up today A 17 18 19 20 21 22 Benevolence 23 Benevolence U O ~o dO Crusade, Borderscros Crusade, Borderscros G 24 Benevolence 25 26 27 28 29 30 Games and Crusade, Borderscros Potluck dPO O ~o 31 Heraldic Tourney 1 2 3 4 5 6 ~ ;O S 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 E O ~o dPO P 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 O ~o dO 21 Heavy Quest at 22 23 24 25 26 27 Feast of the Redwood Grove dPO Butterflies ~o REGULAR MEETINGS ;Baronial Meetings: the first Wednesday of the month at 7:30 pm. Next Meeting will be at ANU, Copland G030 O Baronial heavy fighter practice: - Sunday: from 3:00 pm at Haig Park, O’Connor near scout hall, Fencers and heavies welcome. This is not an SCA event, as waivers are not collected. - Wednesday evenings: from 6:30 pm, at Mawson Oval. This is not an SCA event, as waivers are not collected.
[Show full text]
Design a Coat of Arms
A coat of arms is a unique set of images or symbols that represents a specific person, family, group, or country. Coats of arms Design a were common during the Middle Ages in Europe, but they continue to be used today in national flags, seals, and money. Coat of Elements that are common on coats of arms include shields, animals, and mottos. Arms The colors, symbols, and imagery are specifically chosen to tell you something about that person, group, or family. The coat of arms to the right belongs to Queen The Royal Arms of the United Kingdom, featuring Elizabeth II of England. a shield in the center and a motto on the bottom. Courtesy of Encyclopædia Britannica. Why are symbols important? Symbols help us communicate using images, rather than words. You probably see symbols every day without even realizing it. What do these common symbols represent? Some of the symbols, imagery, and colors commonly used in traditional coats of arms are listed below. A coat of arms is meant to highlight all of the best qualities of the person or group it represents, which is how certain symbols and colors are chosen over others. Anchor: Hope Castle: Safety Horseshoe: Good luck Arrow: Readiness Cat: Courage Knot: Love Bear: Family protection Dove: Peace Purple: Royalty Bee: Hard-working Dragon: Courage Rainbow: Hope Blue: Calm, responsibility Eagle: Fortitude Red: Power, strength Book: Learning Green: Nature Sun: Glory Butterfly: Peace Horse: Readiness Sword: Honor Now it's time to design your own! Share your coat of Using the template on the following page, create a coat of arms for arms with us on yourself or your family.
[Show full text]
Heraldic Achievement of MOST REVEREND NELSON J
Heraldic Achievement of MOST REVEREND NELSON J. PEREZ Tenth Archbishop of Philadelphia Per pale: dexter, argent on a pile azure a mullet in chief of the field, overall on a fess sable three plates each charged with a cross throughout gules; sinister, per fess azure and chevronny inverted azure and Or, in chief a Star of Bethlehem argent and in base a mound Or, over all on a fess sable fimbriated argent, a Paschal Lamb reguardant, carrying in the dexter forelimb a palm branch Or and a banner argent charged with a Cross gules In designing the shield — the central element in what is formally called the heraldic achievement — an archbishop has an opportunity to depict symbolically various aspects of his own life and heritage, and to highlight aspects of Catholic faith and devotion that are important to him. The formal description of a coat of arms, known as the blazon, uses a technical language, derived from medieval French and English terms, which allows the appearance and position of each element in the achievement to be recorded precisely. An archbishop shows his commitment to the flock he shepherds by combining his personal coat of arms with that of the archdiocese, in a technique known as impaling. The shield is divided in half along the pale or central vertical line. The arms of the archdiocese appear on the dexter side — that is, on the side of the shield to the viewer’s left, which would cover the right side (in Latin, dextera) of the person carrying the shield. The arms of the archbishop are on the sinister side — the bearer’s left, the viewer’s right.
[Show full text]