Paper Session III-A-The Mobile Servicing System-A System
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Telesat Canada Form 20-F Filed 2019-03-01
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 20-F Annual and transition report of foreign private issuers pursuant to sections 13 or 15(d) Filing Date: 2019-03-01 | Period of Report: 2018-12-31 SEC Accession No. 0001615774-19-003425 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER Telesat Canada Mailing Address Business Address 1601 TELESAT COURT 1601 TELESAT COURT CIK:1465191| IRS No.: 980530817 | State of Incorp.:A6 | Fiscal Year End: 1231 OTTAWA A6 K1B 5P4 OTTAWA A6 K1B 5P4 Type: 20-F | Act: 34 | File No.: 333-159793-01 | Film No.: 19646641 613-748-0123 SIC: 4899 Communications services, nec Copyright © 2019 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 20-F (Mark One) REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT ☐ OF 1934 OR ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF ☐ 1934 Date of Event Requiring This Shell Company Report For the transition period from to Commission File Number 333-159793-01 TELESAT CANADA (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) Not Applicable (Translation of Registrant’s Name into English) Canada (Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) 160 Elgin Street, Suite 2100, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K2P 2P7 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) Christopher S. -
Aerospace, Defense, and Government Services Mergers & Acquisitions
Aerospace, Defense, and Government Services Mergers & Acquisitions (January 1993 - April 2020) Huntington BAE Spirit Booz Allen L3Harris Precision Rolls- Airbus Boeing CACI Perspecta General Dynamics GE Honeywell Leidos SAIC Leonardo Technologies Lockheed Martin Ingalls Northrop Grumman Castparts Safran Textron Thales Raytheon Technologies Systems Aerosystems Hamilton Industries Royce Airborne tactical DHPC Technologies L3Harris airport Kopter Group PFW Aerospace to Aviolinx Raytheon Unisys Federal Airport security Hydroid radio business to Hutchinson airborne tactical security businesses Vector Launch Otis & Carrier businesses BAE Systems Dynetics businesses to Leidos Controls & Data Premiair Aviation radios business Fiber Materials Maintenance to Shareholders Linndustries Services to Valsef United Raytheon MTM Robotics Next Century Leidos Health to Distributed Energy GERAC test lab and Technologies Inventory Locator Service to Shielding Specialities Jet Aviation Vienna PK AirFinance to ettain group Night Vision business Solutions business to TRC Base2 Solutions engineering to Sopemea 2 Alestis Aerospace to CAMP Systems International Hamble aerostructure to Elbit Systems Stormscope product eAircraft to Belcan 2 GDI Simulation to MBDA Deep3 Software Apollo and Athene Collins Psibernetix ElectroMechanical Aciturri Aeronautica business to Aernnova IMX Medical line to TransDigm J&L Fiber Services to 0 Knight Point Aerospace TruTrak Flight Systems ElectroMechanical Systems to Safran 0 Pristmatic Solutions Next Generation 911 to Management -
Final Report of the International Space Station Independent Safety
I Contents Executive Summary........................................................................................ 1 Principal Observations ..................................................................................... 3 Principal Recommendations ............................................................................. 3 1. Introduction..................................................................................................... 5 Charter/Scope ................................................................................................... 5 Approach........................................................................................................... 5 Report Organization ......................................................................................... 5 2. The International Space Station Program.................................................... 7 International Space Station Characteristics..................................................... 8 3. International Space Station Crosscutting Management Functions............ 12 Robust On-Orbit Systems.................................................................................. 12 The Design ........................................................................................................ 12 Verification Requirements ................................................................................ 12 Physical (Fit) Verification ................................................................................ 13 Multi-element Integrated Test.......................................................................... -
Robotic Arm.Indd
Ages: 8-12 Topic: Engineering design and teamwork Standards: This activity is aligned to national standards in science, technology, health and mathematics. Mission X: Train Like an Astronaut Next Generation: 3-5-ETS1-2. Generate and compare multiple possible solutions to a problem based on how well each is likely A Robotic Arm to meet the criteria and constraints of the problem. 3-5-ETS1-3. Plan and carry out fair tests in which variables are controlled and failure points are considered to identify aspects of a model or prototype that can be EDUCATOR SECTION (PAGES 1-7) improved. STUDENT SECTION (PAGES 8-15) Background Why do we need robotic arms when working in space? As an example, try holding a book in your hands straight out in front of you and not moving them for one or two minutes. After a while, do your hands start to shake or move around? Imagine how hard it would be to hold your hands steady for many days in a row, or to lift something really heavy. Wouldn’t it be nice to have a really long arm that never gets tired? Well, to help out in space, scientists have designed and used robotic arms for years. On Earth, scientists have designed robotic arms for everything from moving heavy equipment to performing delicate surgery. Robotic arms are important machines that help people work on Earth as well as in space. Astronaut attached to a robotic arm on the ISS. Look at your arms once again. Your arms are covered in skin for protection. -
International Space Station Program Mobile Servicing System (MSS) To
SSP 42004 Revision E Mobile Servicing System (MSS) to User (Generic) Interface Control Document Part I International Space Station Program Revision E, May 22, 1997 Type 1 Approved by NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration International Space Station Program Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas Contract No. NAS15–10000 SSP 42004, Part 1, Revision E May 22, 1997 REVISION AND HISTORY PAGE REV. DESCRIPTION PUB. DATE C Totally revised Space Station Freedom Document into an International Space Station Alpha Document 03–14–94 D Revision D reference PIRNs 42004–CS–0004A, 42004–NA–0002, 42004–NA–0003, TBD 42004–NA–0004, 42004–NA–0007D, 42004–NA–0008A, 42004–NA–0009C, 42004–NA–0010B, 42004–NA–0013A SSP 42004, Part 1, Revision E May 22, 1997 INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION PROGRAM MOBILE SERVICING SYSTEM TO USER (GENERIC) INTERFACE CONTROL DOCUMENT MAY 22, 1997 CONCURRENCE PREPARED BY: PRINT NAME ORGN SIGNATURE DATE CHECKED BY: PRINT NAME ORGN SIGNATURE DATE SUPERVISED BY (BOEING): PRINT NAME ORGN SIGNATURE DATE SUPERVISED BY (NASA): PRINT NAME ORGN SIGNATURE DATE DQA: PRINT NAME ORGN SIGNATURE DATE i SSP 42004, Part 1, Revision E May 22, 1997 NASA/CSA INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION PROGRAM MOBILE SERVICING SYSTEM (MSS) TO USER INTERFACE CONTROL DOCUMENT MAY 22, 1997 Print Name For NASA DATE Print Name For CSA DATE ii SSP 42004, Part 1, Revision E May 22, 1997 PREFACE SSP 42004, Mobile Servicing System (MSS) to User Interface Control Document (ICD) Part I shall be implemented on all new Program contractual and internal activities and shall be included in any existing contracts through contract changes. -
The Future of Canada's Space Sector
The Future of Canada’s Space Sector An Engine of Innovation For Over Fifty Years September 2016 “Space is at the cutting edge of innovation.” Hon. Navdeep Bains, Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Launch of Canada’s fourth recruitment campaign for Canadian Astronauts Canadian Aviation Museum -- Ottawa -- June 17, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Canada has a 50-year history as a spacefaring nation. That history is part of what defines Canada as a globally important, advanced economy. That 50-year investment has also left a legacy of infrastructure, institutions and industry that generates significant socio-economic benefits and directly supports or enables government priorities across several departments, including National Defence, Environment & Climate Change, Fisheries & Oceans, In- digenous & Northern Affairs, Natural Resources, Transport, Public Safety and Innovation, Science & Economic De- velopment. Canada’s space sector is also a modern ecosystem of innovation that involves and inspires Canadians in government, academic institutions and private sector companies. The sector supports world-leading Canadian science, generates technological innovation and exports on a daily basis, and has been justifiably identified as an example of the kind of “innovation ecosystem” which the Innovation Agenda seeks to build and expand. It is, however, a sector that faces both significant opportunities and major challenges. Internationally, the industry is in the throes of a generational transformation that is seeing the rise of new players and whole new business models. This provides a host of new opportunities. Unfortunately, domestically, the combined forces of reduced funding and lack of investment certainty are depriving the space innovation engine of the fuel that it needs to respond to this dynamic environment and live up to its full potential. -
Using Range Vision for Telerobotic Control in Hazardous Environments
CA9900166 USING RANGE VISION FOR TELEROBOTIC CONTROL IN HAZARDOUS ENVIRONMENTS M. G. LIPSETT*, M. GREENSPAN**, W.J. BALLANTYNE*** *AECL Chalk River Laboratories **National Research Council of Canada ***Spar Aerospace Ltd. ABSTRACT This paper describes how range vision augments a telerobotic system. The robot has a manipulator arm mounted onto a mobile platform. The robot is driven by a human operator under remote control to a worksite, and then the operator uses video cameras and laser range images to perform manipulation tasks. A graphical workstation displays a three-dimensional image of the workspace to the operator, and a CAD model of the manipulator moves in this "virtual environment" while the actual manipulator moves in the real workspace. This paper gives results of field trials of a remote excavation system, and describes a remote inspection system being developed for reactor maintenance. 1. INTRODUCTION Teleoperated manipulators are used for remote handling of hazardous materials and can also be used for remote inspections, decontamination, and site remediation. These operations require skilled operators who can visualize the remote work area and keep an awareness of the working situation. Existing mobile robot systems are joystick-driven with no automatic control; the only feedback to the operator is a video view. While reliable, such systems are slow and difficult to use, and there is little sensing capability [1]. Situational awareness can be aided by range imaging, which builds a three-dimensional view of the work space on a computer monitor. This view is called a virtual environment (VE). The intent of a VE to present a view of the scene that is realistic enough for the operator to drive the robot as well as if the operator were actually looking at the machine. -
The First Fifteen Years – a Brief History (1987-2002)
THE FIRST FIFTEEN YEARS A BRIEF HISTORY (1987-2002) OF THE CANADIAN ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING Prepared by Dr. Gordon Slemon, FCAE March 2004 Canadian Academy of Engineering Tel: (613) 235-9056 180 Elgin Street Fax: (613) 235-6861 Suite 1100 [email protected] Ottawa ON K2P 2K3 www.acad-eng-gen.ca CONTENTS Executive Summary iii Background 1 Inauguration 5 Membership 7 Financing 8 Operations 10 Mission 11 Development and Implementation 12 Issues Statements 13 Engineering Awareness 15 Relations with the Royal Society of Canada 16 Health and Safety 18 Natural Disaster Reduction 19 Nuclear Energy 20 Engineering Research 22 Engineering Education 25 Lifelong Learning 27 Competitiveness and Entrepreneurship 28 The Engineering Profession 30 Energy and Climate Change 32 Women in Engineering 33 International Linkages 34 Regional Activities 36 Conclusion 37 Former Presidents of the Academy 38 Directors of the Academy 39 ii THE FIRST FIFTEEN YEARS A Brief History (1987-2002) of the Canadian Academy of Engineering EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Canadian Academy of Engineering was established in June 1987 coincident with the centenary celebration of engineering in Canada. Beginning with 44 Founding Fellows, the membership has grown to the planned maximum of 250 professional engineers, elected on the basis of their distinguished careers, and of their service and contributions to society, to the country and to the engineering profession. Over its brief 15-year history, the Academy has independently initiated several major studies, drawing on the expertise of its volunteer members. It has issued eight reports dealing with the engineering education, engineering research, the evolution of the engineering profession and other areas of direct importance to the nation. -
Nanoracks External Cubesat Deployer (NRCSD-E) Interface Definition Document (IDD) 08/31/2018
NanoRacks External CubeSat Deployer (NRCSD-E) Interface Definition Document (IDD) 08/31/2018 Doc No: NR-NRCSD-S0004 Revision: - THIS DOCUMENT HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE BY THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. NANORACKS PROPRIETARY RIGHTS ARE INCLUDED HEREIN. RECIPIENT AGREES THAT NEITHER THIS DOCUMENT NOR THE INFORMATION DISCUSSED HEREIN NOR ANY PART THEREOF SHALL BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS. NanoRacks External CubeSat Deployer IDD NRCSD External Doc No: NR-NRCSD-S0004 Rev: - NanoRacks External CubeSat Deployer Interface Definition Document (IDD) Prepared by Nathan Daniels; Mission Manager; Date Reviewed by Henry Martin; Senior Mission Manager; Date Reviewed by Conor Brown; External Payloads Manager; Date Reviewed by Troy Guy; Avionics Manager; Date Reviewed by Teresa Freund; Safety Engineer; Date Approved by Mike Lewis; Chief Technology Officer; Date NanoRacks External CubeSat Deployer IDD NRCSD External Doc No: NR-NRCSD-S0004 Rev: - List of Revisions Revision Revision Date Revised By Revision Description - 8/31/2018 N. Daniels Initial Release NanoRacks External CubeSat Deployer IDD NRCSD External Doc No: NR-NRCSD-S0004 Rev: - Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.1.1 Scope 1 1.2 Usage 1 1.3 Exceptions 1 2 Acronyms, Definitions, and Applicable Documents 2 3 NanoRacks External CubeSat Deployer System Overview 5 3.1 NRCSD-E Overview and Payload Capacity 5 3.2 NRCSD-E Coordinate System 5 3.3 NRCSD-E Design Features 6 3.4 NRCSD-E Operations Overview 7 3.4.1 Schedule 7 3.4.2 Ground Operations 8 3.4.3 -
Spaceflight a British Interplanetary Society Publication
SpaceFlight A British Interplanetary Society publication Volume 60 No.8 August 2018 £5.00 The perils of walking on the Moon 08> Charon Tim Peake 634072 Russia-Sino 770038 9 Space watches CONTENTS Features 14 To Russia with Love Philip Corneille describes how Russia fell in love with an iconic Omega timepiece first worn by NASA astronauts. 18 A glimpse of the Cosmos 14 Nicholas Da Costa shows us around the Letter from the Editor refurbished Cosmos Pavilion – the Moscow museum for Russian space achievements. In addition to the usual mix of reports, analyses and commentary 20 Deadly Dust on all space-related matters, I am The Editor looks back at results from the Apollo particularly pleased to re- Moon landings and asks whether we are turning introduce in this month’s issue our a blind eye to perils on the lunar surface. review of books. And to expand that coverage to all forms of 22 Mapping the outer limits media, study and entertainment be SpaceFlight examines the latest findings it in print, on video or in a concerning Charon, Pluto’s major satellite, using 18 computer game – so long as it’s data sent back by NASA's New Horizons. related to space – and to have this as a regular monthly contribution 27 Peake Viewing to the magazine. Rick Mulheirn comes face to face with Tim Specifically, it is gratifying to see a young generation stepping Peake’s Soyuz spacecraft and explains where up and contributing. In which this travelling display can be seen. regard, a warm welcome to the young Henry Philp for having 28 38th BIS Russia-Sino forum provided for us a serious analysis Brian Harvey and Ken MacTaggart sum up the of a space-related computer game latest Society meeting dedicated to Russian and which is (surprisingly, to this Chinese space activities. -
Canada's Robotic Arms
CANADA’S ROBOTIC ARMS Murtaza Syed Aqeel Introduction I picked this because it had a big impact on Canada and Canada’s economics. The Canadarm inspired many more robots that are not just in space but have helped us here on earth. Thank you for all the people who created Canadarm! Canadarm Canadarm’s specifications The Canadarm also known as Shuttle Remote Manipulator System (for short SRMS) was remote controlled by astronauts on the shuttle. It weighs 410 kg and its length is 15 m. It has 2 cameras 1 on the elbow and 1 on the wrist Who made it? The fabulous Canadarm cost 110 million dollars. The companies that made Canadarm were Spar Aerospace, it also had CAE Electronics Ltd. And DSMA Acton Ltd. The Canadarm was made on November 13, 1981. What can it do? The Canadarm can lift very heavy things, that is one reason space workers need the Canadarm. It can lift to 30,000 kg on earth and in space it can lift up to 266,000 kg in space. A couple of things Canadarm did were repairing satellites, deploying satellites, and capturing satellites. It did these and other things because it was too dangerous for astronauts to do. How is it repaired? It can be repaired in earth unlike some of the other robots Retirement The Canadarm has done 30 years of great work and is now retired and is being displayed at the Canada Aviation and space Museum in Ottawa, Ontario. it retired on July 2011. Controlling the Canadarm Chris Hadfield was the first Canadian astronaut to control the Canadarm. -
Benefits of a Single-Person Spacecraft for Weightless Operations (Stop Walking and Start Flying)
42nd International Conference on Environmental Systems AIAA 2012-3630 15 - 19 July 2012, San Diego, California Benefits of a Single-Person Spacecraft for Weightless Operations (Stop Walking and Start Flying) Brand N. Griffin1 Gray Research, Engineering, Science, and Technical Services Contract, 655 Discovery Drive Ste. 300, Huntsville, AL 35806 U.S.A Historically, less than 20 percent of crew time related to extravehicular activity (EVA) is spent on productive external work. For planetary operations space suits are still the logical choice; however, for safe and rapid access to the weightless environment, spacecraft offer compelling advantages. FlexCraft, a concept for a single-person spacecraft, enables any- time access to space for short or long excursions by different astronauts. For the International Space Station (ISS), going outside is time-consuming, requiring pre-breathing, donning a fitted space suit, and pumping down an airlock. For each ISS EVA this is between 12.5 and 16 hours. FlexCraft provides immediate access to space because it operates with the same cabin atmosphere as its host. Furthermore, compared to the space suit pure oxygen environment, a mixed gas atmosphere lowers the fire risk and allows use of conventional materials and systems. For getting to the worksite, integral propulsion replaces hand-over- hand translation or having another crew member operate the robotic arm. This means less physical exertion and more time at the work site. Possibly more important, in case of an emergency, FlexCraft can return from the most distant point on ISS in less than a minute. The one-size-fits-all FlexCraft means no on-orbit inventory of parts or crew time required to fit all astronauts.