Private Equity Connect
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Press Release Paris // December 8, 2016
PRESS RELEASE PARIS // DECEMBER 8, 2016 The 15th edition of the Private Equity Exchange & Awards was held in Paris on December 8, 2016. 1,200 participants – Limited Partners, Private Equity Funds and Corporate Executives – gathered for this major Pan-European summit on private equity and restructuring followed by a high-class evening ceremony rewarding the best performers among LBO Funds, Limited Partners and Management Teams. AN INTENSIVE ONE-DAY PROGRAM… 80 outstanding speakers from all over Europe shared their expertise through interactive round-tables and keynote speeches in three main tracks: International LBO & Fundraising; LBO & Management; Underperformance, Restructuring & Private Equity. Experts included: Pascal Blanqué, Chief Investment Officer, Amundi Blair Jacobson, Partner, Ares Management Mark Ligertwood, Partner, Dunedin Fabrice Nottin, Partner, Apollo Global Management Jean-Baptiste Wautier, Managing Partner, BC Partners, etc... DOWNLOAD THE SPEAKERS’ LINE UP …FOCUSING ON NETWORKING OPPORTUNITIES The Private Equity Exchange & Awards promoted targeted networking opportunities in several ways. The Business lunch allowed participants to develop their network and meet participants with diverse profiles. Thanks to the exclusive One-to-One Meetings, participants benefited from a targeted networking planning their meetings ahead of the event through a dedicated online platform. …CONCLUDED BY A PRESTIGIOUS GALA EVENING The gala dinner followed by the Awards Ceremony was the crowning achievement of the event, rewarding the best Private Equity players – LBO, Venture and Growth Capital Funds, Limited Partners and Management Teams – on the long run. Over 80 jury members, top Limited Partners and Asset Management professionals, committed themselves to assess the application forms submitted by carefully preselected nominees. Laureates were rewarded on stage in front of more than 450 private equity players. -
Value in Private Equity: Where Social Meets Shareholder 3 OPPORTUNITIES ALIGNED
VALUE IN PRIVATE EQUITY WHERE SOCIAL MEETS SHAREHOLDER By Mark Hepworth Big Issue Invest March 2014 2 MOVING TOWARDS AN ERA OF OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL... The imbalance of opportunity in society is as striking today as it ever was. In my opinion though, this lack of opportunity is caused, not so much by opportunity not being there, but because of the lack of educational qualifications, or other criteria, such as direction and focus being absent in poorer sections of society. Clearly someone who attended private school, comes from a wealthy and educated family, and who completed their education to degree level is more likely to achieve than someone who was brought up as part of a one parent family, located in an inner city borough, didn’t attend much school and left at the earliest opportunity without any exam passes. Opportunity is always there for those naturally gifted, or lucky enough to spot it, or perhaps those educated enough to recognise it. I recently had lunch with a leading politician and mentioned my belief that we simply must find a way of linking the powerful stallions of free enterprise to the carriage of humanity that follows behind. It is essential in a modern democratic society that we work toward inclusion for all. Forget making the rich poorer, let’s make the poor richer. To most, the goal of private equity investment is typically seen as working in direct conflict to this goal of social inclusion. The media tends to distort and exaggerate the sector like a pantomime villain - asset stripping, job losses, financial engineering...the list goes on. -
Copyright Notice
COPYRIGHT NOTICE Please note: The material contained in this document can be used ONLY forpersonal study/research and therefore can be copied but only forpersonal use. Any form of copying for distribution purposes requires copyright permission from author/university. UNIVERSITY OF NATAL AN EXPLORATORY STUDY TO DETERMINE IF THE VENTURE CAPITAL SCHEMES FRAMEWORK CAN BE INTRODUCED TO SOUTH AFRICA RAJENDRAN GOVENDER University of Natal Graduate School of Business Master of Business Administration Supervisor Pro£ Abhijit Bhattacharya Topic An exploratory study to determine if the Venture Capital Schemes Framework can be introduced to South Africa Student Rajendran Govender Student No. 201 506209 Date 15 September 2003 DECLARAnON "1, Rajendran Govender, hereby declare that: • the work in this report is my own original work, • all sources used or referred to have been documented and recognised, • this report has not been previously submitted in full or partial fulfilment of the requirements for an equivalent, or higher qualification at any other educational institution. " . ... -----------------------------~ ~ . 096662 Rajendran Govender September 2003 • f..:.; ' II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisor, Professor Abhijit Bhattacharya for his assistance, time and guidance in completing this dissertation. I would also like to thank Mr. Raj Sewnarain and Mr. Jay Soma of Business Partners Limited (East Fund - Durban), for taking time out oftheir busy schedules and assisting with the discussion / interview component of the research design. ill ABSTRACT The South African government has indicated that the National Small Business Act of 1996 had failed to get the small business sector working successfully as engine for growth. Thus, government policy measures, using an institutional network alone, to create a thriving SME economy, has not succeeded. -
Boosey & Hawkes
City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Howell, Jocelyn (2016). Boosey & Hawkes: The rise and fall of a wind instrument manufacturing empire. (Unpublished Doctoral thesis, City, University of London) This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/16081/ Link to published version: Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] Boosey & Hawkes: The Rise and Fall of a Wind Instrument Manufacturing Empire Jocelyn Howell PhD in Music City University London, Department of Music July 2016 Volume 1 of 2 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................... 2 Table of Figures...................................................................................................................................... -
Monthly M&A Insider
QUA E D RTERLY ITION A MERGERMARKET REPORT ON GLOBAL M&A ACTIVITY MONTHLY M&A INSIDER JULY 2013 INSIDE: GLOBAL OVERVIEW LATIN AMERICA NORTH AMERICA ASIA-PACIFIC EUROPE MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA ABOUT MERRILL DATASITE AND MERRILL CORPORATION Monthly M&A Insider | July GLOBAL OVERVIEW Q2 2013 finds the global M&A climate in a state of inertia. Buyers have sought to fortify against risk at the expense of growth, which has hindered both trade sales and private equity activity. Deal volume declined 13% year-on-year (YoY) to 2,890 deals, while value dropped 15% YoY to US$480bn. Sustained activity in the Pharma, Medical & The continued importance of secondary buyouts Biotech sector A major story in Q2 2013 was the prevalence of secondary The Pharma, Medical & Biotech sector has been a fertile source buyouts. Secondary buyouts (SBOs) became increasingly of M&A throughout Q2 2013. When comparing Q2 2013 with popular in 2012, and this trend has continued into 2013. Q2 2012, the sector has decreased by a slim 5% in volume, but Exits and buyouts are down YoY in Q2 both in terms of volume by value, the sector has grown YoY by a quarter. High-value and value, but secondary buyouts’ value have increased 8% activity concentrated at the upper-end of the market took place to US$25.5bn, even as volume dropped 17% YoY to 45 deals. throughout Q2. SBOs’ increased frequency has been brought about largely by lack of better options: listing became less popular because of Much of this large-cap activity was driven by private equity instability in equity markets; and controversial valuations have players, who have been particularly active in the sector. -
Partners Group Private Equity
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM NPORT-P Filing Date: 2020-08-26 | Period of Report: 2020-06-30 SEC Accession No. 0001752724-20-174334 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER Partners Group Private Equity (Master Fund), LLC Mailing Address Business Address 1114 AVENUE OF THE 1114 AVENUE OF THE CIK:1447247| IRS No.: 800270189 | State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 0331 AMERICAS AMERICAS Type: NPORT-P | Act: 40 | File No.: 811-22241 | Film No.: 201137479 37TH FLOOR 37TH FLOOR NEW YORK NY 10036 NEW YORK NY 10036 212-908-2600 Copyright © 2020 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document ITEM 1. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS. The Schedule(s) of Investments is attached herewith. Partners Group Private Equity (Master Fund), LLC (a Delaware Limited Liability Company) Consolidated Schedule of Investments — June 30, 2020 (Unaudited) The unaudited consolidated schedule of investments of Partners Group Private Equity (Master Fund), LLC (the “Fund”), a Delaware limited liability company that is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), as a non-diversified, closed-end management investment company, as of June 30, 2020 is set forth below: INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL NET ASSETS Copyright © 2020 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document Partners Group Private Equity (Master Fund), LLC (a Delaware Limited Liability Company) Consolidated Schedule of Investments — June 30, 2020 (Unaudited) Acquisition Fair Industry Shares Date Value Common Stocks (2.38%) Asia - Pacific (0.06%) Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. Technology 06/19/20 4,439 $ 957,581 APA Group Utilities 02/11/16 360,819 2,765,432 Total Asia - Pacific (0.06%) 3,723,013 North America (1.09%) American Tower Corp. -
The Bay Area Innovation System How the San Francisco Bay Area Became the World’S Leading Innovation Hub and What Will Be Necessary to Secure Its Future
The Bay Area Innovation System How the San Francisco Bay Area Became the World’s Leading Innovation Hub and What Will Be Necessary to Secure Its Future A Bay Area Science & Innovation Consortium Report produced by the Bay Area Council Economic Institute Principal Author Sean Randolph President & CEO Bay Area Council Economic Institute Contributing Author Olaf Groth CEO Emergent Frontiers Group LLC June 2012 Message from the BASIC Chairman For more than 50 years, the Bay Area has been a leading center for science and innovation and a global marketplace for the exchange of ideas, delivering extraordinary value for California, the nation and the world. Its success has been based on a unique confluence of research institutions, corporations, finance and people, in a culture that is open to the sharing of new ideas and willing to take significant risk to achieve extraordinary reward. The Bay Area innovation system is also highly integrated, with components that closely interact with and depend upon each other. The Bay Area Science and Innovation Consortium (BASIC), a partnership of the Bay Area’s leading public and private research organizations, has pre- pared this report to illustrate how the Bay Area’s innovation system works and to identify the issues that may impact its future success. Ensuring that success will require partnership between the public and private sectors, continued investment in the region’s core assets, and attention by state and federal policy makers. Mark Bregman Senior Vice President and CTO, Neustar, Inc. Chairman, BASIC Acknowledgements This report was prepared for the Bay Area Science & Innovation Consortium (BASIC) by the Bay Area Council Economic Institute. -
SAVCA KPMG Private Equity Survey 2004
SAVCA Southern African Venture Capital and KPMG AND SAVCA Private Equity and Venture Capital Survey – 2003 KPMG CORPORATE FINANCE The GIBS & SAVCA Foundation Programme for Venture Capital and Private Equity. Consider it your first major investment. The Gordon Institute of Business Science, together with the Southern African Venture Capital and Private Equity Association, have partnered to create The Foundation Programme, a three day course from 1-3 June 2004. This programme will provide a strategic overview of the Venture Capital and Private Equity industry and processes, as well as a working knowledge of key analytical tools used by practitioners and insights into practical challenges and strategic opportunities in the industry. The 3-year partnership between GIBS and SAVCA will include the hosting of: G An annual 3-day Foundation Programme G An annual 1-day Advanced Programme G A number of GIBS Forum events highlighting topical industry issues which have an impact on practitioners. For more information on these programmes visit www.gibs.co.za/savca or to reserve your seat contact Maritsa Botha on 011 771 4317, or email at [email protected]. But don’t wait too long. An investment this profitable doesn’t come around every day SAVCA sponsors KPMG and SAVCA Private Equity and Venture Capital Survey – 2003 KPMG and SAVCA 1 Contents Highlights 3 Glossary 4 Foreword 5 Sources Of Information 6 Introduction to Private Equity 7 Funds Under Management 9 Fund Raising Activity 13 Investment Activity 16 Exits 21 Performance 23 Black Economic Empowerment -
SAMPLE REPORT © Jobsearchdigest.Com
Private Equity & VC Compensation Report Private Equity & VC Compensation Report SAMPLE REPORT © JobSearchDigest.com www.PrivateEquityCompensation.com © PrivateEquityCompensation.com You may not forward, copy or reproduce this content in any format. CONTENTS © PrivateEquityCompensation.com – SAMPLE REPORT You may not forward, copy or reproduce this content in any format. Private Equity & Venture Capital Compensation Report Page 1 Introduction For 12 years now, we have gone to the source to track private equity and venture capital compensation – professionals inside the industry. While we have previously seen significant swings in compensation, we recently have documented greater stability and predictability in industry compensation, even as market and fund performance varies. This year's report includes actual data from hundreds of partners and employees representing several hundred private equity and venture capital firms. We polled respondents in October and November 2018, and dug deep to learn about a variety of factors that could affect pay. The 2019 Private Equity and Venture Capital Compensation Report summarizes our findings and answers questions such as: • What are the compensation levels and ranges by title? • How does fund size and performance affect pay? • What is the balance between base salaries and bonus payouts? • How are bonuses calculated and when are they paid out? • Which titles earn the most and how has their compensation changed? • Who is sharing in carry and at what levels? • What are the primary drivers of carry participation? The report also seeks to understand how private equity and venture capital professionals perceive their work, their pay and their job security. Where possible, we offer insights from the industry and our experience. -
K P M G a N D S a V C a Private Equity and Venture Capital Survey – 2002
KPMG AND SAVCA Private Equity and Venture Capital Survey – 2002 KPMG CORPORATE FINANCE SAVCA – WBS Foundation Programme for Practitioners In Venture Capital and Private Equity VCPE 7-9 May 2003 University of the Witwatersrand 2 St David’s Place, PARKTOWN, Johannesburg 2193 Programme Booking and Administration: Anne Badcock Tel: (011) 717-3573 Fax (011) 643-2336 e-mail: [email protected] WBS Website: www.wits.ac.za/wbs KPMG and SAVCA Private Equity and Venture Capital Survey – 2002 Highlights I South Africa’s private equity industry boasts R40,6 billion in funds under management I R8,7 billion in undrawn commitments available for future investments I Investment spending by private equity firms up 63% from 2001 to R3,9 billion in 2002 I Fourth consecutive year of decreased fund raising with R800 million in new commitments raised during 2002 Private Equity and Venture Capital Survey – 2002 3 Contents Glossary 4 Foreword 5 Sources of information 6 Introduction to private equity 7 Funds under management and commitments 9 Investments 17 Exits 21 Performance 22 Black Economic Empowerment 24 References and footnotes 26 Glossary IRR – Internal Rate of Return. BEE – Black Economic Empowerment. BVCA – British Venture Capital Association. EVCA – European Private Equity & Venture Capital Association. Follow on investments – Investments into companies where first round funding has already been made. Gross IRR – IRR before the deduction of management fees and carried interest. Gross realised IRR – Gross IRR on the total realised portfolio of investments. Draw down – A draw down or capital call occurs when third party investors (called limited partners in the US) provide cash to a private equity fund for investment into a portfolio company. -
PDF: 300 Pages, 5.2 MB
The Bay Area Council Economic Institute wishes to thank the sponsors of this report, whose support was critical to its production: The Economic Institute also wishes to acknowledge the valuable project support provided in India by: The Bay Area Council Economic Institute wishes to thank the sponsors of this report, whose support was critical to its production: The Economic Institute also wishes to acknowledge the valuable project support provided in India by: Global Reach Emerging Ties Between the San Francisco Bay Area and India A Bay Area Council Economic Institute Report by R. Sean Randolph President & CEO Bay Area Council Economic Institute and Niels Erich Global Business/Transportation Consulting November 2009 Bay Area Council Economic Institute 201 California Street, Suite 1450 San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 981-7117 (415) 981-6408 Fax [email protected] www.bayareaeconomy.org Rangoli Designs Note The geometric drawings used in the pages of this report, as decorations at the beginnings of paragraphs and repeated in side panels, are grayscale examples of rangoli, an Indian folk art. Traditional rangoli designs are often created on the ground in front of the entrances to homes, using finely ground powders in vivid colors. This ancient art form is believed to have originated from the Indian state of Maharashtra, and it is known by different names, such as kolam or aripana, in other states. Rangoli de- signs are considered to be symbols of good luck and welcome, and are created, usually by women, for special occasions such as festivals (espe- cially Diwali), marriages, and birth ceremonies. Cover Note The cover photo collage depicts the view through a “doorway” defined by the section of a carved doorframe from a Hindu temple that appears on the left. -
IOB Evaluations
IOB Evaluation | no. 324 IOB Evaluation | no. The economic and social infrastructure of many least developed countries is severely inadequate or even non-existent. One reason for this is the difficulty in obtaining long-term capital for IOB Evaluation investment in infrastructure. That is why the Dutch Minister for Development Cooperation established the Least Developed Countries (LDC) Infrastructure Fund in 2002. The Fund, which is managed by the Netherlands Development Finance Company (FMO), aims to stimulate private investment in infrastructure in LDCs. This report presents the results of an evaluation of the Fund’s first five years. Investing in infrastructure Policy and Operations Evaluation Department | IOB Evaluations | no. 324 | July 2009 | Policy and Operations Evaluation Department | IOB Evaluations | no. 324 | July 2009 Policy and Operations Evaluation Department | IOB Evaluations | no. 324 | July 2009 | Policy and Operations Evaluation Department | IOB Evaluations | no. 324 | July 2009 | EvaluationEvidence of the fromLDC Infrastructure developing Fund countries Investing in infrastructure Published by: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands P.O.Box 20061 | 2500 eb The Hague | The Netherlands www.minbuza.nl © Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands | July 2009 | OSDR/6642/E AbuDhabiAbujaAccraAddisAbebaAlgiersAlmatyAmmanAnkaraAntwerpenAsmaraAstanaAtheneBagdadBamakoBangkokBarcelonaBeiroetBelgradoBerlijnBernBoedapestBoekarestBogotáBrasiliaBratislavaBrusselBuenosAiresBujumburaCairoCanberraCaracasChicagoColomboCotonouDakarDamascusDarEsSalaamDenHaagDhakaDohaDublinDüsseldorfFrankfurt/MainGenèveGuangzhouGuatemalaHamburgHanoiHarareHavanna