Private Equity Benchmark Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Private Equity Benchmark Report Preqin Private Equity Benchmarks: All Private Equity Benchmark Report As of 31st March 2014 alternative assets. intelligent data. Preqin Private Equity Benchmarks: All Private Equity Benchmark Report As of 31st March 2014 Report Produced on 9th October 2014 This publication is not included in the CLA Licence so you must not copy any portion of it without the permission of the publisher. All rights reserved. The entire contents of the report are the Copyright of Preqin Ltd. No part of this publication or any information contained in it may be copied, transmitted by any electronic means, or stored in any electronic or other data storage medium, or printed or published in any document, report or publication, without the express prior written approval of Preqin Ltd. The information presented in the report is for information purposes only and does not constitute and should not be construed as a solicitation or other offer, or recommendation to acquire or dispose of any investment or to engage in any other transaction, or as advice of any nature whatsoever. If the reader seeks advice rather than information then he should seek an independent fi nancial advisor and hereby agrees that he will not hold Preqin Ltd. responsible in law or equity for any decisions of whatever nature the reader makes or refrains from making following its use of the report. While reasonable efforts have been used to obtain information from sources that are believed to be accurate, and to confi rm the accuracy of such information wherever possible, Preqin Ltd. Does not make any representation or warranty that the information or opinions contained in the report are accurate, reliable, up-to-date or complete. Although every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this publication Preqin Ltd. does not accept any responsibility for any errors or omissions within the report or for any expense or other loss alleged to have arisen in any way with a reader’s use of this publication. Preqin Private Equity Benchmarks: All Private Equity Benchmark Report As of 31st March 2014 Report Produced on 9th October 2014 Median Benchmark - All Private Equity All Regions - As of 31st March 2014 .................................p4. Median Benchmark - All Private Equity North America - As of 31st March 2014 ..........................p6. Median Benchmark - All Private Equity Europe - As of 31st March 2014 .......................................p8. Median Benchmark - All Private Equity Asia ...................................................................................p10. Weighted Benchmark - All Private Equity All Regions - As of 31st March 2014 ...........................p12. Pooled Benchmark - All Private Equity All Regions .........................................................................p14. Horizon IRRs - As of 31st March 2014 ................................................................................................p16. List of Constituent Funds ....................................................................................................................p20. Preqin Private Equity Benchmarks ® are calculated using performance information available from our online Performance Analyst database, the world’s most extensive, transparent database of private equity fund performance. Users of the online database have access to all of the underlying fund performance data used to calculate these benchmarks. With performance for over 7,100 private equity funds, the Performance Analyst online database is regularly updated and fully searchable. Further information can be found at www.preqin.com/pa. All the performance figures used to generate the Preqin Private Equity Market Benchmarks are net position to investor – i.e. all commitments, contributions, distributions, remaining values and IRRs are all based on the net position for the institutional investor before tax but after the management fees and carry of the general partner. The Preqin All Private Equity Market Benchmark is based on performance data for 4,664 funds of vintages 1983 to 2014 as of 31st March 2014. Preqin gathers fund returns information from a very wide and diverse range of sources, including public institutions via freedom of information legislations, published reports of a number of listed fund of funds vehicles and GP voluntary contributions. The sheer extent of the data sources that we now use provides many opportunities to crosscheck and verify data for an individual partnership from different sources, and increases our confidence in the data. A growing number of GPs have concluded that it is in their best interests to voluntarily share information on their partnerships: given that many prospective investors are seeing this information, it is better that they should have access to the most current and accurate figures possible. Even where data comes direct from the GP, however, our aim is still to show the net position for LPs, after management fees and carry. We are again very grateful to the significant number of GPs who now share data with us in this way; currently 1,000 GPs are contributing data on their funds. If you would like further details on contributing information on your firm please contact us at [email protected]. Q1 2014 Preqin Private Equity Benchmarks: All Private Equity Benchmark Report Preqin Median Benchmarks: All Private Equity All Regions as of 31st March 2014 Median Fund Multiple Quartiles (X) IRR Quartiles (%) IRR Max/Min (%) No. Called Dist Value Vintage Q1 Median Q3 Q1 Median Q3 Max Min Funds (%) (%) DPI (%) RVPI 2014 36 3.9 0.0 90.0 1.00 0.91 0.36 n/m n/m n/m n/m n/m 2013 188 16.5 0.0 96.5 1.10 0.99 0.89 n/m n/m n/m n/m n/m 2012 197 35.0 0.0 100.5 1.19 1.07 0.96 n/m n/m n/m n/m n/m 2011 260 53.3 4.7 103.8 1.32 1.16 1.02 21.6 13.2 7.1 80.9 -27.9 2010 181 75.2 16.2 104.1 1.46 1.26 1.14 20.0 13.2 8.1 82.6 -29.5 2009 145 84.0 29.2 100.0 1.63 1.38 1.15 20.6 15.0 7.2 448.0 -20.4 2008 323 88.4 35.1 92.0 1.54 1.33 1.16 16.8 11.0 5.6 54.8 -23.6 2007 369 91.4 42.3 85.4 1.55 1.36 1.14 12.9 9.1 4.9 58.1 -45.3 2006 338 95.5 52.1 75.0 1.52 1.32 1.08 11.0 6.9 2.1 50.0 -100.0 2005 297 97.7 77.0 49.1 1.61 1.36 1.07 12.6 7.4 3.3 105.5 -100.0 2004 174 98.8 97.8 34.3 1.78 1.44 1.06 17.1 8.3 1.5 79.8 -38.2 2003 138 100.0 126.8 20.3 1.99 1.56 1.30 23.0 12.8 7.7 59.2 -49.9 2002 134 100.0 131.0 13.8 2.05 1.57 1.17 26.1 13.1 3.9 93.0 -47.2 2001 177 100.0 147.1 8.9 2.13 1.63 1.27 24.4 12.9 6.6 70.0 -19.3 2000 260 99.3 134.3 5.9 1.93 1.43 1.00 19.3 10.3 1.8 73.0 -96.0 1999 176 100.0 135.9 0.0 1.78 1.41 0.90 15.1 8.0 -1.3 154.7 -40.6 1998 185 100.0 143.0 0.0 1.88 1.45 1.11 17.1 9.7 3.1 1015.7 -100.0 1997 169 100.0 160.6 0.0 2.31 1.61 1.22 23.4 12.6 4.8 267.8 -45.7 1996 128 100.0 168.5 0.0 2.25 1.68 1.26 26.7 13.8 6.5 188.4 -33.3 1995 108 100.0 175.9 0.0 2.42 1.76 1.38 29.2 17.6 8.5 447.4 -22.0 1994 98 100.0 183.6 0.0 2.51 1.84 1.26 34.9 18.3 8.9 92.2 -22.6 1993 85 100.0 228.3 0.0 3.38 2.29 1.52 40.2 20.2 10.9 105.7 -29.1 1992 74 100.0 177.5 0.0 2.70 1.78 1.29 34.1 19.0 8.5 110.4 -49.9 1991 44 100.0 234.4 0.0 3.08 2.35 1.86 33.0 23.4 11.9 346.4 -0.5 1990 68 100.0 207.6 0.0 2.56 2.08 1.50 25.1 16.9 8.7 74.4 -35.9 1989 81 100.0 230.8 0.0 3.32 2.31 1.60 30.3 16.8 11.0 198.5 -42.1 1988 52 100.0 215.6 0.0 3.06 2.16 1.69 29.8 15.7 10.1 54.5 -9.3 1987 49 100.0 215.2 0.0 3.30 2.15 1.36 22.0 14.9 7.2 31.3 -12.4 1986 40 100.0 190.9 0.0 2.45 1.91 1.42 15.9 12.7 5.7 280.0 -4.9 1985 37 100.0 200.1 0.0 2.83 2.01 1.50 16.2 11.6 7.9 40.7 1.3 1984 30 100.0 205.2 0.0 2.85 2.05 1.58 13.9 12.4 7.5 45.7 1.7 1983 23 100.0 175.5 0.0 2.89 1.76 1.39 21.3 9.9 5.0 51.6 -3.5 Source: Preqin Performance Analyst Preqin Median Benchmarks: All Private Equity All Regions is calculated using data for 4,664 funds of vintages between 1983 and 2014 with performance as of 31st March 2014 and includes liquidated funds.
Recommended publications
  • TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM of the STATE of ILLINOIS 2815 West Washington Street I P.O
    Teachers’ Retirement System of the State of Illinois Compliance Examination For the Year Ended June 30, 2020 Performed as Special Assistant Auditors for the Auditor General, State of Illinois Teachers’ Retirement System of the State of Illinois Compliance Examination For the Year Ended June 30, 2020 Table of Contents Schedule Page(s) System Officials 1 Management Assertion Letter 2 Compliance Report Summary 3 Independent Accountant’s Report on State Compliance, on Internal Control over Compliance, and on Supplementary Information for State Compliance Purposes 4 Independent Auditors’ Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards 8 Schedule of Findings Current Findings – State Compliance 10 Supplementary Information for State Compliance Purposes Fiscal Schedules and Analysis Schedule of Appropriations, Expenditures and Lapsed Balances 1 13 Comparative Schedules of Net Appropriations, Expenditures and Lapsed Balances 2 15 Comparative Schedule of Revenues and Expenses 3 17 Schedule of Administrative Expenses 4 18 Schedule of Changes in Property and Equipment 5 19 Schedule of Investment Portfolio 6 20 Schedule of Investment Manager and Custodian Fees 7 21 Analysis of Operations (Unaudited) Analysis of Operations (Functions and Planning) 30 Progress in Funding the System 34 Analysis of Significant Variations in Revenues and Expenses 36 Analysis of Significant Variations in Administrative Expenses 37 Analysis
    [Show full text]
  • Real Estate Pledge Funds: an Alternative in the Alternative Space
    2013 Real Estate Pledge Funds: An Alternative in the Alternative Space THE CHALLENGING FUND-RAISING ENVIRONMENT of Background and Structure the past few years for the alternative asset market has drawn Pledge funds are often contractual arrangements taking the increasing attention to fund-raising alternatives, including a form of individual “investment” or “participation” agree- revival of interest in “pledge fund” structures.1 Pledge funds, ments between the sponsor and each investor. Pledge funds once more popular as precursors to true blind pool funds, can also be structured as sponsor-managed limited partner- UPDATE fell out of favor during the frothy fund-raising period of the ships or LLCs, with the participating investors admitted as mid-2000s. However, as fund sponsors have seen the fund- limited partners or members. Whether a pledge fund is raising market tighten and investors increase their interest structured as a contractual arrangement or as a partnership in “direct” investments, a market has begun to develop for or another vehicle, a new vehicle would typically be formed pledge funds. These fund structures can present an attrac- to facilitate each investment, admitting only those investors tive midpoint between the direct investment model and a that have opted in to make the investment. Investors that fully committed blind pool, enabling sponsors to have some opted out of the investment are therefore shielded from any amount of certainty in funding their deals and allowing in- exposure resulting from an investment they do not make. vestors to retain discretion over their investment decisions by being able to opt in or opt out on a deal-by-deal basis.
    [Show full text]
  • May CARG 2020.Pdf
    ISSUE 30 – MAY 2020 ISSUE 30 – MAY ISSUE 29 – FEBRUARY 2020 Promoting positive mental health in teenagers and those who support them through the provision of mental health education, resilience strategies and early intervention What we offer Calm Harm is an Clear Fear is an app to Head Ed is a library stem4 offers mental stem4’s website is app to help young help children & young of mental health health conferences a comprehensive people manage the people manage the educational videos for students, parents, and clinically urge to self-harm symptoms of anxiety for use in schools education & health informed resource professionals www.stem4.org.uk Registered Charity No 1144506 Any individuals depicted in our images are models and used solely for illustrative purposes. We all know of young people, whether employees, family or friends, who are struggling in some way with mental health issues; at ARL, we are so very pleased to support the vital work of stem4: early intervention really can make a difference to young lives. Please help in any way that you can. ADVISER RANKINGS – CORPORATE ADVISERS RANKINGS GUIDE MAY 2020 | Q2 | ISSUE 30 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted The Corporate Advisers Rankings Guide is available to UK subscribers at £180 per in any form or by any means (including photocopying or recording) without the annum for four updated editions, including postage and packaging. A PDF version written permission of the copyright holder except in accordance with the provision is also available at £360 + VAT. of copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Barnard’s Inn, 86 Fetter Lane, London, EC4A To appear in the Rankings Guide or for subscription details, please contact us 1EN.
    [Show full text]
  • Billing Code: 6750-01S
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 11/28/2016 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2016-28472, and on FDsys.gov BILLING CODE: 6750-01S FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Granting of Request for Early Termination of the Waiting Period Under the Premerger Notification Rules Section 7A of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. 18a, as added by Title II of the Hart-Scott- Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, requires persons contemplating certain mergers or acquisitions to give the Federal Trade Commission and the Assistant Attorney General advance notice and to wait designated periods before consummation of such plans. Section 7A(b)(2) of the Act permits the agencies, in individual cases, to terminate this waiting period prior to its expiration and requires that notice of this action be published in the Federal Register. The following transactions were granted early termination -- on the dates indicated -- of the waiting period provided by law and the premerger notification rules. The listing for each transaction includes the transaction number and the parties to the transaction. The grants were made by the Federal Trade Commission and the Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice. Neither agency intends to take any action with respect to these proposed acquisitions during the applicable waiting period. Early Terminations Granted October 1, 2016 thru October 31, 2016 10/03/2016 20161722 G Hainan Cihang Charitable Foundation ; Blackstone Capital Partners (Cayman II) VI L.P. ; Hainan Cihang Charitable Foundation 20161727 G Wellforce Inc. ; Hallmark Health Corporation ; Wellforce Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Cross-Border M&A Conference
    2016 CROSS-BORDER M&A CONFERENCE Investment, Digitization and Globalization in Times of Disruption DATE Tuesday, September 20, 2016 TIME 9.00 am - 4.00 pm CEST VENUE Hotel Bayerischer Hof, Munich Co-sponsored by Media Partners In partnership with 2016 CROSS-BORDER M&A CONFERENCE Investment, Digitization and Globalization in Times of Disruption US/Europe and Asia/Europe Cross-Border M&A and Activist Shareholders McDermott Will & Emery’s Munich M&A Conference In contrast with 2015, Q1of 2016 was considerably slow- (MuMAC) is celebrating its 6th year. We are looking forward er. M&A activity by deal volume globally was down by 24 to welcoming significant M&A market participants, strategic per cent this year, compared to Q1 of 2015. In the private and private equity investors, and individuals from the advi- equity market, buy-outs were down by 15.3 per cent and sory world to take part in discussions on topics relating to exits by 29.7 per cent over the same period. Was this as a cross-border M&A. result of the markets preparing for the uncertainty surround- ing the United Kingdom’s Brexit Referendum, or a sign of We would very much like to thank in advance our key note something wider? speaker Callum Mitchell-Thomson, Head of Investment Banking Germany for J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., and the MuMAC 2016 is the best place to get answers from experts. many speakers participating in the panel discussions. Come and join us. MuMAC 2016 will cover topics of major significance to the cross-border M&A markets, including regional investment trends in Europe, both from and into Asia and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Value in Private Equity: Where Social Meets Shareholder 3 OPPORTUNITIES ALIGNED
    VALUE IN PRIVATE EQUITY WHERE SOCIAL MEETS SHAREHOLDER By Mark Hepworth Big Issue Invest March 2014 2 MOVING TOWARDS AN ERA OF OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL... The imbalance of opportunity in society is as striking today as it ever was. In my opinion though, this lack of opportunity is caused, not so much by opportunity not being there, but because of the lack of educational qualifications, or other criteria, such as direction and focus being absent in poorer sections of society. Clearly someone who attended private school, comes from a wealthy and educated family, and who completed their education to degree level is more likely to achieve than someone who was brought up as part of a one parent family, located in an inner city borough, didn’t attend much school and left at the earliest opportunity without any exam passes. Opportunity is always there for those naturally gifted, or lucky enough to spot it, or perhaps those educated enough to recognise it. I recently had lunch with a leading politician and mentioned my belief that we simply must find a way of linking the powerful stallions of free enterprise to the carriage of humanity that follows behind. It is essential in a modern democratic society that we work toward inclusion for all. Forget making the rich poorer, let’s make the poor richer. To most, the goal of private equity investment is typically seen as working in direct conflict to this goal of social inclusion. The media tends to distort and exaggerate the sector like a pantomime villain - asset stripping, job losses, financial engineering...the list goes on.
    [Show full text]
  • Investor Profile Report GEORGE R
    Investor Profile Report PRESENTED BY GEORGE R. BROWN CONVENTION CENTER March 9-10, 2016 Glossary Business Description: All investments by industry: A description of the firm’s primary type, Graph of transactions by industry, represented in preferences and location. PitchBook is an the PitchBook Platform. This breakdown is based impartial information provider on primary industries of the portfolio/serviced and will remove promotional language. companies. Assets under management (AUM): Specific to Lender Profiles The amount of money that the investor manages Total debt financings: for clients based on number of currently-managed The number of entities identified by PitchBook that funds. received debt financing from the firm in the last five years. Active private equity investments: The number of active companies in the investor’s Target debt financing amount: current portfolio identified by PitchBook in the Preferred amount of debt typically provided by last five years. This includes add-on transactions. the firm in a transaction. Total private equity investments: Specific to Service Provider Profiles The total number of companies in the investor’s Total transactions: portfolio, identified by PitchBook in the last five The number of transactions identified by years. This includes add-on transactions. PitchBook that the firm has provided service on in the last five years. Target EBITDA: Preferred EDITDA range targeted for investment. Total companies serviced: The number of unique companies the firm has Target revenue: provided service to in the last five years, identified Preferred revenue range targeted for investment. by PitchBook. Preferred investment amount: Total investors serviced: Preferred investment amount range that the firm The number of unique investors identified by typically invests in PitchBook that the firm has provided service to in a transaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Equity in Sweden
    PRIVATE EQUITY IN SWEDEN An analysis of the private equity industry in Sweden and two case studies on individual companies’ competitive strategy JOHAN MATTISSON MASTER THESIS LUND UNIVERSITY, 2017 Abstract Private equity is a growing global phenomena and private equity companies have become a major force in many of Sweden’s industries. These companies own portfolio companies which together employs around 190 000 people and have an annual revenue of over 318 billion SEK. The purpose of this thesis was to describe and analyze the Swedish private equity industry and individual companies’ competitive strategy to increase value of portfolio companies and to attract capital. The methodical approach of this thesis was qualitative and abductive. Only public data was used bar the two interviews that was conducted with the case companies. The theoretical framework for the industry analysis was Porters five forces. The case companies were analyzed on the corporate, business and operational levels of strategy. A resource based view was used to further analyze the case companies’ strategic capabilities. The main findings from the industry analysis was that the vast majority of investors in Swedish private equity funds are made by professional institutions and a large amount of the investments were of international origin. The large pool of investors makes it easier for Swedish private equity companies to attract capital. The number of new private equity funds have been declining since 2007 but at the same time the average fund size has grown. There are many differentiating factors between private equity companies. This differentiation is beneficial for the private equity companies as they become less commoditized from the viewpoint of an investor.
    [Show full text]
  • Q2 2013 Preqin Private Equity Benchmarks: All Private Equity Benchmark Report
    Preqin Private Equity Benchmarks: All Private Equity Benchmark Report As of 30th June 2013 alternative assets. intelligent data. Preqin Private Equity Benchmarks: All Private Equity Benchmark Report As of 30th June 2013 Report Produced on 12th March 2014 This publication is not included in the CLA Licence so you must not copy any portion of it without the permission of the publisher. All rights reserved. The entire contents of the report are the Copyright of Preqin Ltd. No part of this publication or any information contained in it may be copied, transmitted by any electronic means, or stored in any electronic or other data storage medium, or printed or published in any document, report or publication, without the express prior written approval of Preqin Ltd. The information presented in the report is for information purposes only and does not constitute and should not be construed as a solicitation or other offer, or recommendation to acquire or dispose of any investment or to engage in any other transaction, or as advice of any nature whatsoever. If the reader seeks advice rather than information then he should seek an independent fi nancial advisor and hereby agrees that he will not hold Preqin Ltd. responsible in law or equity for any decisions of whatever nature the reader makes or refrains from making following its use of the report. While reasonable efforts have been used to obtain information from sources that are believed to be accurate, and to confi rm the accuracy of such information wherever possible, Preqin Ltd. Does not make any representation or warranty that the information or opinions contained in the report are accurate, reliable, up-to-date or complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Pt1~~'~ Sillman, Joseph Blalk, John Vl- I\Orkmg 36 Hours and the Next Team Now
    Search for school planetarium director continues left for a teachmg pOSitIOn at mechamcal abIlIty, ImagInatIOn of the Community Performmg moo the curricula for elementary, By Margie Reins Smith aren't scheduled for any tIme Macomb CommunIty College He and creatIvIty for development of Arts Center and dedicated on middle and high school students StaN Writer soon - perhaps not until Septem- teaches phySICSand astronomy. programs, and a teachers' certIfi- Oct 27, 1982. Director Tim m Grosse Pomte. Planetariums are supposed to ber The $225,000 bUlldmg,which "It was an excltmg thmg," said Grosse Pomte IShavmg trouble cate. Skomeczny was hired away from Bob Thomson, director of the be dark Not 24 hOUl& a day, how. seats 36 people and features a Robert Welch, director of Secon- findmg another dIrector Accord- ever Not locked up tIght, wIth- SpItz projector and a 24-foot Roosevelt High School m Wyan- mg to VIncent LoCIcero, presI- planetarIUm at Adler Elemen- dotte, which had been forced to dary Curriculum In Grosse out VISltOls,wIthout dllectOl or dome, was constructed With dent of the Grosse Pomte school tary School m Southfield smce It close Its planetanum because of Pomte "I have nothmg but money flom the estate of BenJa board, planetarIum directors are opened m 1968, said he backed students the system's financial troubles praise for what has happened Grosse Pomte's foul and a-half mm Long a rare breed The pOSItIOnIS a mto the pOSitIOn "I taught as SkOnIeczny began an ambItIous there " The publIc school faclhty, one very speCialIzed field, Involvmg tlonomy m OhlO for five years year-old planetanum at NOlth senes of commumty programs The faCIlItywas closed last Au.
    [Show full text]
  • Marqeta | Private Company Profile
    Generated by PitchBook Last Updated: 05-Apr-2021 pbId: 54330-13 Marqeta | Private Company Profile Highlights PitchBook Analyst Coverage Employees 562 As of 24-Mar-2021 Last Deal Details Post Valuation $10.00B E $4.30B E IPO 18-Feb-2021 As of 28-May-2020 Total Raised to Date Valuation Step-up $526.95M 2.20x As of 18-Feb-2021 Series E - Series E1 General Information Description Developer of an application programming interface payment platform designed to offer card issuing and payment processing services. The company's platform offers a set of controls and configurations to meet the needs of on-demand service businesses, alternative lenders as well as those looking for payouts for workers, flexible expense management and scalable, secure virtual card transactions, enabling developers and financial institutions to get a simplified way of managing payment programs. Most Recent Financing Status (as of 25-Feb-2021) The company filed to go public on February 18, 2021. The expected offering amount is $10 billion. Previously, the company received an undisclosed amount of financing from MasterCard (NYS:MA) on October 8, 2020. Prior to this, an undisclosed investor sold its stake in the company to Discovery Capital Management for an undisclosed amount on August 26, 2020. Earlier, the company raised $150 million of Series E1 venture funding from Vitruvian Partners and 7 other investors on May 28, 2020, putting the company's pre-money valuation at $4.15 billion. The company will use the funding to accelerate product development and international growth. The company is being actively tracked by PitchBook.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Intelligence
    32 | BUYOUTS | May 28, 2018 www.buyoutsnews.com MARKET INTELLIGENCE The following charts reflect transactions involving U.S.-based financial sponsors. The categories include seeking buyers, announced deals, closed transactions. The source for the data is Thomson One, a product of Thomson Reuters Markets. Please contact Paul Centopani at [email protected] with questions or comments. DEAL FLOW Seeking Buyers–U.S. Targets (April 30, 2018 - May 13, 2018) MEDIA AND ENTERTAINMENT Date Target Target Target Target Full Business Description Target Synopsis Announced Name City State Advisors 05/07/18 NASCAR Daytona Florida National Association for Stock Car Racing Inc {NASCAR}, located - US - In May 2018, National Association for Stock Car Racing Inc, a Beach in Daytona Beach, Florida, provides spectator sports services in Daytona Beach- based provider of sports services, announced that it was the United States. The company was founded in 1948. seeking a buyer for an undisclosed majority interest in the company. RECENT DEALS Announced, Pending LBOs By U.S. Sponsors (April 30, 2018 - May 13, 2018) CONSUMER PRODUCTS AND SERVICES Rank Target Name Target Short Acquiror Full Acquiror Ranking Value Synopsis Date Business Name Ultimate inc. Net Debt of Description Parent Target ($Mil) 05/01/18 RPX Corp Pvd intellectual HGGC LLC HGGC LLC 355.506 US - HGGC LLC definitively agreed to merge with RPX Corp (RPX), a San Francisco-based ppty svcs provider of business support services, for USD 10.50 in cash per share, or a total value of USD 523.945 mil, via tender offer, in a leveraged buyout transaction. Originally, in January 2018, RPX, announced that it was seeking a buyer for the company.
    [Show full text]