An Icon of Ugliness—Eutropius the Eunuch

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Icon of Ugliness—Eutropius the Eunuch RIHA Journal 0226 | 30 September 2019 An Icon of Ugliness—Eutropius the Eunuch Susanna Elm Abstract Theoretically, u line!! a! ae!thetic concept—more than the ab!ence o# beauty— $r!t came to the #ore in the 19th century% Thi! contribution u!e! the late &atin poet 'lau(ian (370–404 '-. to !ho/ that hi! in0ective epic a ain!t the con!ul an( eunuch -utropiu! )(% 399 '-. alrea(y create( a notion o# u line!! throu h the 1uxtapo!ition o# the splen(i( con!ular robe! an( the "u line!!3 o# Eutropiu!4! bo(y% 516 The year wa! 399 '-, the venue 'on!tantinople% Ima ine the ne/ly electe( con!ul o# the -a!tern empire, cla( in the trabea, the con!ular robe heavy with ol( an( litterin multicolore( 1e/el!, (rape( with art#ully embroi(ere( ban(! )clave!), hol(in the !cipio, or !cepter o# o7ce, an( carrie( by a !pecial carria e%1 Hi! name an( that o# hi! collea ue in the 8e!t, 9anliu! Theo(oru!, will be in!cribe( in 3the #a!ti o# the entire worl(3 a! be$ttin the hol(er o# the hi he!t o7ce, !urpa!!e( only by the !acre( 'hri!tian emperor!, Arca(iu!, t/enty:two, in 'on!tantinople, an( hi! brother Honoriu!, #ourteen, in 9ilan%2 Thi! -a!tern con!ul ha( alrea(y receive( an 1 'lau(ian, ;n the I< 'onsulate o# Honoriu! =6=:=6*, =6,-601> ;n Stilicho 2%339 )?uote! #rom 'lau(ian #ollo/ the e(ition by John @% Hall, 'lau(iu! 'lau(ianu!% ;pera, &eipAi 19B=> an( the [amen(e(] translation by 9aurice Clatnauer, 'lau(ian, 2 0ol!%, 'ambri( e, 9A 1922, 0ol% 1, 13B-229.> 'o(e2 Theo(osianu! 1,%12%1 )e(% Theo(or 9ommsen an( Caul 9artin 9eyer, Theo(osiani libri D<I cum constitutionibu! Sirmon(iani! et le e! no0ellae a( Theo(osianum pertinente!, 2 0ol!%, @erlin 190=.> 9ichael Roberts, The Je/ele( StyleE Coetry an( Coetics in &ate Anti?uity, Ithaca 19B9, 111-11=, /ith $ % 23 on p% 113 #rom the 'alen(ar o# Filocalu! (epictin the consul Gallu!> 9ichael He/ar, "Spinnin the TrabeaE 'on!ular Robe! an( Cropa an(a in the Cane yrics o# 'lau(ian", inE Roman Dre!! an( the Fabrics o# Roman 'ulture, e(!% Jonathan -(monson an( Alison Ieith, Toronto 200B, 21*-23*> i(%, 'lau(ian, Cane yricu! (e Se2to 'onsulatu Honorii Au usti, ;2#or( 1996> DirJ SchlinJert, ;r(o senatoriu! un( nobilita!% Die Ionstitution (e! Senatsa(el! in (er SpKtantiJe, Stutt art 1996, 162-1**% 2 Ammianu! 9arcellinus, Re! estae 29%2%1= (e(% &oeb 'lassical &ibrary 5&'&6 331, 222-22,.E con!ulare! post scipione! et trabea! et #astorum monumenta mun(ane> #or the name o# the secon( con!ul see 9arcellinu! 'omes, 'hronicon, a( annum 399, ?uotin 'lau(ian, In -utropium 1%B (e(% Theo(or 9ommsen, 'hronica minora saec. I<, <, <I, <II, 0ol% 2, @erlin 1B9,, 3*-10B 5L 9onumenta Germaniae Historica, Auctore! anti?uissimi, 116> The 'hronicle o# 9arcellinu!% A Translation an( 'ommentary by @rian 'roJe 5/ith a Repro(uction o# 9ommsen4! -(ition o# the Te2t6, Sy(ney 199=.> #or 9anliu! Theo(orus, !ee John F% 9atthe/s, RIHA Journal 0226 | 30 September 2019 extraor(inary honor in the prece(in year, /hen the emperor ha( rante( him the title patriciu!, a title that (i( not corre!pon( to a !peci$c o7ce but !imply expre!!e( hi he!t e!teem%3 526 Such e!teem wa! well merite(% In the two prece(in year! the newly minte( con!ul ha( repelle( Gothic an( Hunnic incur!ion! into A!ia 9inor an( Armenia, but hi! a!!ociation /ith an( !ervice #or the imperial court ha( been o# #ar lon er (urMe% , Alrea(y the emperor Theo(o!iu! I (379–395), Arca(iu!N an( Honoriu!N! #ather, ha( entru!te( him with (elicate (iplomatic mi!!ion!%= 8hile in Antioch on one o# tho!e mi!!ion!, he ha( encountere( a certain a!cetic an( prie!t calle( John, /ho!e elo?uence !o impre!!e( the later con!ul that he ma(e him bi!hop o# 'on!tantinople a ain!t con!i(erable re!i!tance, above all #rom Alexan(ria, but with the !upport o# the imperial court% Further, !hortly a#ter the (eath o# Theo(o!iu! in 395, he ha( arran e( Arca(iu!N! marria e to a certain -u(oxia%6 So, there he i!E a patriciu! an( 8estern Aristocracies an( Imperial 'ourt AH 36,+,2=, ;2#or( 19*=, repr% 1990, 2=B-261% 3 A% H% 9% Jones, The &ater Roman -mpire 2B–602E A Social, -conomic, an( A(ministrati0e Sur0ey, 3 0ol!%, ;2#or( 196,, 0ol% 1, 1*6 on the patriciu!> Ceter Guyot, -unuchen al! Skla0en un( Frei elassene in (er riechisch-rOmischen AntiJe, Stutt art 19B0, 136-13*> SchlinJert, ;r(o !enatoriu! un( nobilita!, 2,B-2=0> Hel a Scholten, Her -unuch in IaisernKhe% Pur politischen un( soAialen @e(eutun (e! praepositu! sacri cubiculi im ,% un( =% Jahrhun(ert n% 'hr%, FranJ#urt 199=, ,6:=0% , Alan 'ameron, 'lau(ian% Coetry an( Cropa an(a at the 'ourt o# Honoriu!, ;2#or( 19*0, 12,-129E 132> 'lau(ia Tiersch, Johanne! 'hrysostomu! in 'onstantinople )39B+,0,.% 8eltsicht un( 8irJen eine! @ischo#! in (er Hauptsta(t (e! ;strOmischen Reiche!, TQbin en 2002, 31:,1% = Calla(ius, Historia &ausiaca 3= (e(% CG 3,.> Historia 9onachorum in Ae ypto 1%6, (e(% an( tran!% An(rM:Jean Festu iRre, Historia 9onachorum in Ae ypto, @russel! 1961.> 'lau(ian, In -utr% 1%311-316% 6 Calla(ius, Dialo ue =%==:=* (e(% S' 33,. i! the mo!t (etaile( account o# -utropiu!N! eSort! to brin John to 'onstantinople, sparJe( by -utropiu!N! encounter /ith John /hile in Antioch to prepare #or the resistance a ainst Hunnic incursion! into Asia 9inor% The #uneral oration by C!%:9artyrius, clo!er to the actual e0ents, (oe! not mention -utropiu! in that conte2t> see Funerary Speech #or John 'hrysostom, tran!% Timothy H% @arne! an( Geor e @e0an, &i0erpool 2013, 2-3% See also Socrate! Scholasticus, Historia ecclesiastica 6%2 (e(% CG 6*.> SoAomen, Hist% eccl% B%2 )e(% CG 6*.> Theo(oret o# 'yrrhus, Hist% eccl% =%2* (e(% CG B2.% 8en(y 9ayer, "John 'hryso!tom a! @ishopE The <ie/ #rom Antioch", inE Journal o# -cclesiastical History == (200,), ,==:,66, esp% ,=6, caution! a ainst trustin Calla(iu! too much% See also ea(%, 3John 'hryso!tom a! 'risi!:9ana er% The Tear! in 'onstantinople3, inE Ancient Je/ish an( 'hristian Te2t! a! 'risi! 9ana ement &iterature, e(!% Da0i( '% Sim an( Cauline Allen, &on(on 2012, 12B-1,3% ;n pa e 13* 9ayer call! -utropiu! a non:'hristian /ithout #urther comment% I am not sure /hy, other than perhap! refectin the #act that he sou ht to taJe a/ay the 'hurchN! ri ht to asylum, an attempt SoAomen, Hist% eccl% B%*%3, calls impiou!% The #act that John also re#ers to him a! an enemy o# the 'hurch (oes not maJe RIHA Journal 0226 | 30 September 2019 Roman con!ul, a 0ictoriou! military comman(er, a member o# the !acre( council, the !acer comitatu!, a con!ummate palace in!i(er an( tru!te( a(vi!or o# the 'hri!tian imperial couple, an( a vital !upporter o# John 'hryso!tom, the bi!hop o# 'on!tantinople )(% 407 AH.E an e2emplary repre!entative o# the hi he!t elite% Ho/ (o we picture himV 8hat woul( he wear /hen not cla( in the 1e/el:encru!te( trabea, what mi ht he ha0e looJe( liJeV Here i! one de!criptionE Hi! !Jin ha( rown loo!e /ith a e> hi! #ace, more wrinJle( than a prune, ha( #allen in becau!e o# the (eep line! in hi! cheeJ!% &e!! (eep (oe! the plou h cut the #allo/! in the $el(!, 5le!! (eep are6 the #ol(! wrou ht in the !ail! by the /in(% &oath!ome rub! ate away hi! hea( an( bare patche! appeare( ami( hi! hair% It wa! a! thou h clump! o# (ry barren corn (otte( a !un:parche( $el(, or a! i# a !/allo/ /ere (yin in winter !ittin on a branch, moultin in the #ro!ty /eather% Truly, that the outra e to the trabea mi ht one (ay be even reater, Fortune a((e( to her luxury thi! bran( (nota. to hi! #orehea(, thi! (e#orme( #ace% 5W6 Hi! pallor an( nearly bare bone! 5W6 rou!e( #eelin ! o# horror 5W6 an( hi! pale complexion an( emaciate( bo(y oSen(e( all, scarin chil(ren, di! u!tin tho!e who sat at table [with him], 5W6 terri#yin a! with an e0il omen tho!e that met him 5W6 liJe a trouble!ome corp!e or an ill:omene( gho!t%* 536 An( here i! the characteriAation o# the rulin con!ul! o# the year 399 in the !uccinct wor(! o# the sixth:century 'hronicle o# Marcellinu!E 12th 5in(iction, the con!ulate o#6 Theo(oru! an( -utropiu! the -unuch% Thi! -utropiu! o# all eunuch! wa! the $r!t an( the la!t con!ul% 'oncernin him the poet 'lau(ian !ay!E 4all portent! yiel( their place /hen a eunuch i! ma(e con!ul [omnia ce!!erunt eunucho con!ule mon!tra64, him not a 'hristian—the 3'hurch3 in 'onstantinople al/ay! ha( enemie!> John 'hrysostom, In -utropium )e(% CG =2%391-396), here CG =2%39, ll 2*-2B (tran!% 8en(y 9ayer an( Cauline Allen, John 'hryso!tom, &on(on 2000, 13*-13B.% The e(ict i! not e2tant% For a more (etaile( analysis o# John 'hrysostomNs sermon see 8en(y 9ayer, "The Au(ience(s) #or Catristic Social Teachin E A 'a!e Stu(y", inE Rea(in Catristic Te2t! in Social -thics, e(!% Johan &eemans, @rian 9atA an( Johan <erstaeten, 8ashin ton, H%'% 2011, B3-9*E 92-9,% * 'lau(ian, In -utr% 1%110-123E Iam?ue ae0o la2ata cutis, sulci!?ue enarumX corruerat passa #acie! ru osior u0aEX fa0a minu! pre!!o fn(untur 0omere rura,X nec 0ento sic 0ela tremunt% miserabile turpe!X e2e(ere caput tineae> (eserta patebantX inter0alla comaeE ?uali! sitientibu! ar0i!X ari(a ieiunae se e! interlucet aristaeX 0el ?uali! eli(i! pluma labente pruini!X arbori! inmoritur truncoXbrumali! hirun(o%X scilicet ut trabei! iniuria cresceret olim,X ha! in #ronte notas, hoc (e(ecu! a((i(it ori!X lu2uriate Fortuna suaeE cum palli(a nu(i!X ossibu! horrorem (omini! praeberet ima oX (ecolor et macie! occursu lae(eret omnes,X aut pueri! latura metu! aut tae(ia mensi!X aut crimen #amuli! aut proce(entibu! omen,X et nihil e2hausto caperent in stipite lucri% Hel e Sch/ecken(iek, 'lau(ian! In0ekti0e e en -utrop% -in Iommentar, Hil(esheim 1992> Jacqueline &on , 'lau(ianN! In -utropium, or, Ho/, 8hen, an( 8hy to Slan(er a -unuch, 'hapel Hill 1996, 1> 'atherine 8are, 'lau(ian an( the Roman -pic Tra(ition, 'ambri( e 2012, 3-6% RIHA Journal 0226 | 30 September 2019 ?uotin the very poem ju!t cite(%B 5,6 The poet 'lau(ian (370–404 '-.
Recommended publications
  • The Story of the Byzantine Empire
    THE STO RY O F T HE NATIO NS L LU T T E E R VO L . I z M o I S A . P , R D , T H E E AR L I E R VO L UM E S A R E f I N E F R E E B P o AS A . SO T H STO R Y O G E C . y r . I . HARR R F R E B TH U ILM A N T HE STO Y O O M . y A R R G EW B P f A K O S E R F T HE S . o S . M T HE ST O Y O J y r . J . H R B Z N R O F DE . A R A coz I T HE ST O Y C HA L A . y . — R F E R N . B S B ING O U L THE ST O Y O G MA Y y . AR G D F N W B P f H B YE S E N o . H . O T HE ST O R Y O O R A Y . y r N E n E B . E . a d S SA H T HE ST O R Y O F SP A I . y U N AL N B P R of. A . VAM B Y T HE STO R Y O F H U GA R Y . y r E ST R O F E B P of L E TH E O Y C A RT H A G .
    [Show full text]
  • Eunuchs in the East, Men in the West? 147
    Eunuchs in the East, Men in the West? 147 Chapter 8 Eunuchs in the East, Men in the West? Dis/unity, Gender and Orientalism in the Fourth Century Shaun Tougher Introduction In the narrative of relations between East and West in the Roman Empire in the fourth century AD, the tensions between the eastern and western imperial courts at the end of the century loom large. The decision of Theodosius I to “split” the empire between his young sons Arcadius and Honorius (the teenage Arcadius in the east and the ten-year-old Honorius in the west) ushered in a period of intense hostility and competition between the courts, famously fo- cused on the figure of Stilicho.1 Stilicho, half-Vandal general and son-in-law of Theodosius I (Stilicho was married to Serena, Theodosius’ niece and adopted daughter), had been left as guardian of Honorius, but claimed guardianship of Arcadius too and concomitant authority over the east. In the political manoeu- vrings which followed the death of Theodosius I in 395, Stilicho was branded a public enemy by the eastern court. In the war of words between east and west a key figure was the (probably Alexandrian) poet Claudian, who acted as a ‘pro- pagandist’ (through panegyric and invective) for the western court, or rather Stilicho. Famously, Claudian wrote invectives on leading officials at the eastern court, namely Rufinus the praetorian prefect and Eutropius, the grand cham- berlain (praepositus sacri cubiculi), who was a eunuch. It is Claudian’s two at- tacks on Eutropius that are the inspiration and central focus of this paper which will examine the significance of the figure of the eunuch for the topic of the end of unity between east and west in the Roman Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Hadrian and the Greek East
    HADRIAN AND THE GREEK EAST: IMPERIAL POLICY AND COMMUNICATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Demetrios Kritsotakis, B.A, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Fritz Graf, Adviser Professor Tom Hawkins ____________________________ Professor Anthony Kaldellis Adviser Greek and Latin Graduate Program Copyright by Demetrios Kritsotakis 2008 ABSTRACT The Roman Emperor Hadrian pursued a policy of unification of the vast Empire. After his accession, he abandoned the expansionist policy of his predecessor Trajan and focused on securing the frontiers of the empire and on maintaining its stability. Of the utmost importance was the further integration and participation in his program of the peoples of the Greek East, especially of the Greek mainland and Asia Minor. Hadrian now invited them to become active members of the empire. By his lengthy travels and benefactions to the people of the region and by the creation of the Panhellenion, Hadrian attempted to create a second center of the Empire. Rome, in the West, was the first center; now a second one, in the East, would draw together the Greek people on both sides of the Aegean Sea. Thus he could accelerate the unification of the empire by focusing on its two most important elements, Romans and Greeks. Hadrian channeled his intentions in a number of ways, including the use of specific iconographical types on the coinage of his reign and religious language and themes in his interactions with the Greeks. In both cases it becomes evident that the Greeks not only understood his messages, but they also reacted in a positive way.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hammond Collection
    CATALOGUE OF THE IN THE LAW LIBRARY OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA. COMPILED BY FRANK H. NOBLE, fl.,,. M., LL. B., LIBRARIAN. LAW L\BRAPV DECH 1975 U£1iversity of Iowa lOWA CITY. PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY. 1895. INTRODUCTORY NOTE. The Hammond Historical Law Collection of which the following is a catalogue, has been donated to the State University of Iowa, by Mrs. William G. Hammond, in accor<lance with the wishes of her husband, expressed within a few days of his death, which occured at St. Louis, on April 12, 18<)4. Under the terms· of the gift the collection is to be kept tog~ther in cases specially provided for that purpose in the Law Library, and to remain there as a memorial of Dr. Hammond and of his connection with the Law Department as its Chancellor, from the organization of the Department in 1868 until 1881. The collection comprises twelve hundred and thirty-seven volumes, relating principally to the civil law and to the history of the common law. In the latter branch it covt!rs the legal institutions of the Teutonic tribes in general, and of the Anglo-Saxons in particular, as well- as the early period of the developments of legal institutions in England. Dr. Hammond, while preparing ii.is edition of Blackstone's Commen­ taries, collected copies of all th,e editions of that work published during the authOr's life-time, and this rare collection is included in the gift. In the Library is kept a card catalogue of the whole collection.
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantine Missionaries, Foreign Rulers, and Christian Narratives (Ca
    Conversion and Empire: Byzantine Missionaries, Foreign Rulers, and Christian Narratives (ca. 300-900) by Alexander Borislavov Angelov A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in The University of Michigan 2011 Doctoral Committee: Professor John V.A. Fine, Jr., Chair Professor Emeritus H. Don Cameron Professor Paul Christopher Johnson Professor Raymond H. Van Dam Associate Professor Diane Owen Hughes © Alexander Borislavov Angelov 2011 To my mother Irina with all my love and gratitude ii Acknowledgements To put in words deepest feelings of gratitude to so many people and for so many things is to reflect on various encounters and influences. In a sense, it is to sketch out a singular narrative but of many personal “conversions.” So now, being here, I am looking back, and it all seems so clear and obvious. But, it is the historian in me that realizes best the numerous situations, emotions, and dilemmas that brought me where I am. I feel so profoundly thankful for a journey that even I, obsessed with planning, could not have fully anticipated. In a final analysis, as my dissertation grew so did I, but neither could have become better without the presence of the people or the institutions that I feel so fortunate to be able to acknowledge here. At the University of Michigan, I first thank my mentor John Fine for his tremendous academic support over the years, for his friendship always present when most needed, and for best illustrating to me how true knowledge does in fact produce better humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • Emperors and Generals in the Fourth Century Doug Lee Roman
    Emperors and Generals in the Fourth Century Doug Lee Roman emperors had always been conscious of the political power of the military establishment. In his well-known assessment of the secrets of Augustus’ success, Tacitus observed that he had “won over the soldiers with gifts”,1 while Septimius Severus is famously reported to have advised his sons to “be harmonious, enrich the soldiers, and despise the rest”.2 Since both men had gained power after fiercely contested periods of civil war, it is hardly surprising that they were mindful of the importance of conciliating this particular constituency. Emperors’ awareness of this can only have been intensified by the prolonged and repeated incidence of civil war during the mid third century, as well as by emperors themselves increasingly coming from military backgrounds during this period. At the same time, the sheer frequency with which armies were able to make and unmake emperors in the mid third century must have served to reinforce soldiers’ sense of their potential to influence the empire’s affairs and extract concessions from emperors. The stage was thus set for a fourth century in which the stakes were high in relations between emperors and the military, with a distinct risk that, if those relations were not handled judiciously, the empire might fragment, as it almost did in the 260s and 270s. 1 Tac. Ann. 1.2. 2 Cass. Dio 76.15.2. Just as emperors of earlier centuries had taken care to conciliate the rank and file by various means,3 so too fourth-century emperors deployed a range of measures designed to win and retain the loyalties of the soldiery.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordering Divine Knowledge in Late Roman Legal Discourse
    Caroline Humfress ordering.3 More particularly, I will argue that the designation and arrangement of the title-rubrics within Book XVI of the Codex Theodosianus was intended to showcase a new, imperial and Theodosian, ordering of knowledge concerning matters human and divine. König and Whitmarsh’s 2007 edited volume, Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire is concerned primarily with the first three centuries of the Roman empire Ordering Divine Knowledge in and does not include any extended discussion of how knowledge was ordered and structured in Roman juristic or Imperial legal texts.4 Yet if we classify the Late Roman Legal Discourse Codex Theodosianus as a specialist form of Imperial prose literature, rather than Caroline Humfress classifying it initially as a ‘lawcode’, the text fits neatly within König and Whitmarsh’s description of their project: University of St Andrews Our principal interest is in texts that follow a broadly ‘compilatory’ aesthetic, accumulating information in often enormous bulk, in ways that may look unwieldy or purely functional In the celebrated words of the Severan jurist Ulpian – echoed three hundred years to modern eyes, but which in the ancient world clearly had a much higher prestige later in the opening passages of Justinian’s Institutes – knowledge of the law entails that modern criticism has allowed them. The prevalence of this mode of composition knowledge of matters both human and divine. This essay explores how relations in the Roman world is astonishing… It is sometimes hard to avoid the impression that between the human and divine were structured and ordered in the Imperial codex accumulation of knowledge is the driving force for all of Imperial prose literature.5 of Theodosius II (438 CE).
    [Show full text]
  • Constantine the Great and Christian Imperial Theocracy Charles Matson Odahl Boise State University
    Boise State University ScholarWorks History Faculty Publications and Presentations Department of History 1-1-2007 Constantine the Great and Christian Imperial Theocracy Charles Matson Odahl Boise State University Publication Information Odahl, Charles Matson. (2007). "Constantine the Great and Christian Imperial Theocracy". Connections: European Studies Annual Review, 3, 89-113. This document was originally published in Connections: European Studies Annual Review by Rocky Mountain European Scholars Consortium. Copyright restrictions may apply. Coda: Recovering Constantine's European Legacy 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Constantine the Great and Christian Imperial Theocracy Charles Matson Odahl, Boise State University1 rom his Christian conversion under the influence of cept of imperial theocracy was conveyed in contemporary art Frevelatory experiences outside Rome in A.D. 312 until (Illustration I). his burial as the thirteenth Apostle at Constantinople in Although Constantine had been raised as a tolerant 337, Constantine the Great, pagan polytheist and had the first Christian emperor propagated several Olympian of the Roman world, initiated divinities, particularly Jupiter, the role of and set the model Hercules, Mars, and Sol, as for Christian imperial theoc­ di vine patrons during the early racy. Through his relationship years of his reign as emperor
    [Show full text]
  • Diocletian's New Empire
    1 Diocletian's New Empire Eutropius, Brevarium, 9.18-27.2 (Eutr. 9.18-27.2) 18. After the death of Probus, CARUS was created emperor, a native of Narbo in Gaul, who immediately made his sons, Carinus and Numerianus, Caesars, and reigned, in conjunction with them, two years. News being brought, while he was engaged in a war with the Sarmatians, of an insurrection among the Persians, he set out for the east, and achieved some noble exploits against that people; he routed them in the field, and took Seleucia and Ctesiphon, their noblest cities, but, while he was encamped on the Tigris, he was killed by lightning. His son NUMERIANUS, too, whom he had taken with him to Persia, a young man of very great ability, while, from being affected with a disease in his eyes, he was carried in a litter, was cut off by a plot of which Aper, his father-in-law, was the promoter; and his death, though attempted craftily to be concealed until Aper could seize the throne, was made known by the odour of his dead body; for the soldiers, who attended him, being struck by the smell, and opening the curtains of his litter, discovered his death some days after it had taken place. 19. 1. In the meantime CARINUS, whom Carus, when he set out to the war with Parthia, had left, with the authority of Caesar, to command in Illyricum, Gaul, and Italy, disgraced himself by all manner of crimes; he put to death many innocent persons on false accusations, formed illicit connexions with the wives of noblemen, and wrought the ruin of several of his school-fellows, who happened to have offended him at school by some slight provocation.
    [Show full text]
  • Jordanes and the Invention of Roman-Gothic History Dissertation
    Empire of Hope and Tragedy: Jordanes and the Invention of Roman-Gothic History Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Brian Swain Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Timothy Gregory, Co-advisor Anthony Kaldellis Kristina Sessa, Co-advisor Copyright by Brian Swain 2014 Abstract This dissertation explores the intersection of political and ethnic conflict during the emperor Justinian’s wars of reconquest through the figure and texts of Jordanes, the earliest barbarian voice to survive antiquity. Jordanes was ethnically Gothic - and yet he also claimed a Roman identity. Writing from Constantinople in 551, he penned two Latin histories on the Gothic and Roman pasts respectively. Crucially, Jordanes wrote while Goths and Romans clashed in the imperial war to reclaim the Italian homeland that had been under Gothic rule since 493. That a Roman Goth wrote about Goths while Rome was at war with Goths is significant and has no analogue in the ancient record. I argue that it was precisely this conflict which prompted Jordanes’ historical inquiry. Jordanes, though, has long been considered a mere copyist, and seldom treated as an historian with ideas of his own. And the few scholars who have treated Jordanes as an original author have dampened the significance of his Gothicness by arguing that barbarian ethnicities were evanescent and subsumed by the gravity of a Roman political identity. They hold that Jordanes was simply a Roman who can tell us only about Roman things, and supported the Roman emperor in his war against the Goths.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]
  • The Corpus Juris Civilis
    College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Library Staff ubP lications The oW lf Law Library 2015 The orC pus Juris Civilis Frederick W. Dingledy William & Mary Law School, [email protected] Repository Citation Dingledy, Frederick W., "The orC pus Juris Civilis" (2015). Library Staff Publications. 118. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/libpubs/118 Copyright c 2015 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/libpubs The Corpus Juris Civilis by Fred Dingledy Senior Reference Librarian College of William & Mary Law School for Law Library of Louisiana and Supreme Court of Louisiana Historical Society New Orleans, LA – November 12, 2015 What we’ll cover ’History and Components of the Corpus Juris Civilis ’Relevance of the Corpus Juris Civilis ’Researching the Corpus Juris Civilis Diocletian (r. 284-305) Theodosius II Codex Gregorianus (r. 408-450) (ca. 291) {{ Codex Theodosianus (438) Codex Hermogenianus (295) Previously… Byzantine Empire in 500 Emperor Justinian I (r. 527-565) “Arms and laws have always flourished by the reciprocal help of each other.” Tribonian 528: Justinian appoints Codex commission Imperial constitutiones I: Ecclesiastical, legal system, admin II-VIII: Private IX: Criminal X-XII: Public 529: Codex first ed. {{Codex Liber Theodora (500-548) 530: Digest commission 532: Nika (Victory) Riots Digest : Writings by jurists I: Public “Appalling II-XLVII: Private arrangement” XLVIII: Criminal --Alan XLIX: Appeals + Treasury Watson L: Municipal, specialties, definitions 533: Digest/Pandects First-year legal textbook I: Persons II: Things III: Obligations IV: Actions 533: Justinian’s Institutes 533: Reform of Byzantine legal education First year: Institutes Digest & Novels Fifth year: Codex The Novels (novellae constitutiones): { Justinian’s constitutiones 534: Codex 2nd ed.
    [Show full text]