DOCSLIB.ORG

SPECIES DIVERSITY and SEASONAL ABUNDANCE of SCARABAEOIDEA at FOUR LOCATIONS in SOUTH CAROLINA Kevin Hinson Clemson University, Krhinso@Clemson.Edu

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SPECIES DIVERSITY and SEASONAL ABUNDANCE of SCARABAEOIDEA at FOUR LOCATIONS in SOUTH CAROLINA Kevin Hinson Clemson University, Krhinso@Clemson.Edu Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 5-2011 SPECIES DIVERSITY AND SEASONAL ABUNDANCE OF SCARABAEOIDEA AT FOUR LOCATIONS IN SOUTH CAROLINA Kevin Hinson Clemson University, krhinso@clemson.edu Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Hinson, Kevin, "SPECIES DIVERSITY AND SEASONAL ABUNDANCE OF SCARABAEOIDEA AT FOUR LOCATIONS IN SOUTH CAROLINA" (2011). All Theses. 1082. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/1082 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact kokeefe@clemson.edu. SPECIES DIVERSITY AND SEASONAL ABUNDANCE OF SCARABAEOIDEA AT FOUR LOCATIONS IN SOUTH CAROLINA _______________________________________________________ A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Entomology _______________________________________________________ by Kevin Richard Hinson May 2011 _______________________________________________________ Accepted by: Juang-Horng Chong, Committee Co-Chair John C. Morse, Committee Co-Chair Julia L. Sharp, Committee member ABSTRACT Using light, flight-intercept, and pitfall traps, 74, 327 specimens of Scarabaeoidea were captured at four golf courses in South Carolina during 2009-2010. Aphodiinae were identified only to the subfamily level and totaled 57,502 specimens. 16,825 specimens in 47 genera and 104 species in the families Ceratocanthidae, Geotrupidae, Hybosoridae, Lucanidae, Passalidae, Scarabaeidae (excluding Aphodiinae), and Trogidae were identified based on morphological characteristics. Similar to other southeastern studies focusing on phytophagous scarabs, the most abundant species consisted of Dyscinetus morator (Fabricius), Euetheola humilis (Burmeister), Cyclocephala lurida Bland, and Hybosorus illigeri Reiche. The most speciose genus captured was Phyllophaga Harris, totaling 22 species. A new state record for Phyllophaga inepta (Horn) is reported. Light traps captured the highest number of specimens (94% of total specimens captured), followed by pitfall trapping (4%), and flight-intercept traps (2%). Light traps captured the highest number of species (83), followed by flight-intercept traps (52), and pitfall traps (15). Flight- intercept traps captured many Cetoniinae and Scarabaeinae species that were not captured in light traps, suggesting that these species may be non-phototactic. Pitfall traps yielded comparatively fewer species, many of which were already present in high numbers in light traps. The highest species diversity occurred at Camden Country Club. The proximity of this location to the convergence of three physiographical regions may explain the unusually high diversity. Male-biased sex ratios were more prevalent in all trap types. ii DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this work to my mother Teresa, my father Walter, and my brother Mark, for supporting my interest in entomology in every conceivable way from a very young age, and for developing their own sense of enthusiasm for “the little things in life.” As only my family could know, my love for entomology all too frequently developed into an entire home filled with insects. Beyond simple tolerance, my family’s embracement of what many would have considered an ecosystem of unwanted guests is beyond comparison. I would not have developed a love for insects as strongly as I have were it not for my family, and for this I owe them unlimited gratitude. I would also like to dedicate this work to my infant niece, Cameron. I happily anticipate a future of answering, “What’s this bug?” I would also like to dedicate this work to my neighbors, the Doziers. Their gardens presented a paradise for the aspiring naturalist, a paradise where I was always welcome and treated as family. I would especially like to thank Adam for sharing my interest in insects and for so many wonderful summer days spent outdoors. I occasionally recall our tireless search for a particular type of diving beetle among our neighborhood streams. After all these years, I am happy that I can finally call those elusive dytiscids by their proper name: Acilius . iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Juang-Horng Chong, Dr. John Morse, and Dr. Julia Sharp for their edititorial work and guidance throughout my research. I would like to thank the superintendants and staff at Camden Country Club, the Cliffs Turfgrass Research and Education Center, the Country Club of South Carolina, and Walker Golf Course for allowing me to conduct research on their beautifully maintained courses. I thank Fran Wimberly, Shawn West, Jessie Strickland, Leslie Strickland, Elaine Chandler, and Danielle Sexton for the collection and sorting of many specimens from Camden Country Club and the Country Club of South Carolina. I would also like to thank Paul Robbins, Cecil Smith, Edward Riley, and Kristin Simpson for help in confirming the identification and locating collection data for P. inepta . I also appreciate the editorial help of Al Wheeler and Peter Adler regarding the P. inepta manuscript. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TITLE PAGE ...............................................................................................................................................i ABSTRACT............................................................................................................................................... ii DEDICATION .......................................................................................................................................... iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................................iv LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF FIGURES....................................................................................................................................ix CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION TO SCARABAEOIDEA ........................................................................1 Scarabaeoidea in Human History ...................................................................................1 Systematics of Scarabaeoidea.........................................................................................3 Scarabaeoidea of South Carolina....................................................................................4 Economically important scarabaeids ..............................................................................8 Scarabaeinae as indicators of ecosystem health............................................................13 II. EXAMINATION OF SPECIES DIVERSITY AND SEASONAL ABUNDANCE OF SCARABAEOIDEA AT FOUR LOCATIONS IN SOUTH CAROLINA..................16 Materials and Methods .................................................................................................17 Results ..........................................................................................................................22 Discussion.....................................................................................................................35 Conclusion....................................................................................................................44 v Table of Contents (Continued) Page III. NEW STATE RECORD FOR PHYLLOPHAGA INEPTA (HORN) (COLEOPTERA: SCARABAEIDAE: MELOLONTHINAE) FROM SOUTH CAROLINA........................................................................................................70 IV. DISCUSSION OF ABUNDANT SCARABAEOIDS IN THREE SOUTHEASTERN STATES.........................................................................72 APPENDICES...........................................................................................................................................74 A: Total number of specimens collected in light traps per species, per date, per location during 2009-2010 ............................................................................75 REFERENCES..........................................................................................................................................96 vi LIST OF TABLES Table Page 2.1 Species of Scarabaeoidea captured in South Carolina during 2009-2010 ..................................59 2.2 Months during which scarabaeoid species were captured in flight-intercept traps at each sampling location….......................................................................................................64 2.3 Months during which scarabaeoid species were captured in pitfall traps at each sampling location…...............................................................................68 A-1 Light trap collections of Scarabaeoidea from Camden Country Club (Camden, South Carolina) March- June, 2009… .......................................................................75 A-2 Light trap collections of Scarabaeoidea from Camden Country Club (Camden, South Carolina) July-September, 2009… ..................................................................77 A-3 Light trap collections of Scarabaeoidea from Camden Country Club (Camden, South Carolina) October-December, 2009.................................................................78 A-4 Light
Load more
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

108 pages remaining, click to load more.

Recommended publications
  • Morphology, Taxonomy, and Biology of Larval Scarabaeoidea
    Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://www.archive.org/details/morphologytaxono12haye ' / ILLINOIS BIOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS Volume XII PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS *, URBANA, ILLINOIS I EDITORIAL COMMITTEE John Theodore Buchholz Fred Wilbur Tanner Charles Zeleny, Chairman S70.S~ XLL '• / IL cop TABLE OF CONTENTS Nos. Pages 1. Morphological Studies of the Genus Cercospora. By Wilhelm Gerhard Solheim 1 2. Morphology, Taxonomy, and Biology of Larval Scarabaeoidea. By William Patrick Hayes 85 3. Sawflies of the Sub-family Dolerinae of America North of Mexico. By Herbert H. Ross 205 4. A Study of Fresh-water Plankton Communities. By Samuel Eddy 321 LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS BIOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS Vol. XII April, 1929 No. 2 Editorial Committee Stephen Alfred Forbes Fred Wilbur Tanner Henry Baldwin Ward Published by the University of Illinois under the auspices of the graduate school Distributed June 18. 1930 MORPHOLOGY, TAXONOMY, AND BIOLOGY OF LARVAL SCARABAEOIDEA WITH FIFTEEN PLATES BY WILLIAM PATRICK HAYES Associate Professor of Entomology in the University of Illinois Contribution No. 137 from the Entomological Laboratories of the University of Illinois . T U .V- TABLE OF CONTENTS 7 Introduction Q Economic importance Historical review 11 Taxonomic literature 12 Biological and ecological literature Materials and methods 1%i Acknowledgments Morphology ]* 1 ' The head and its appendages Antennae. 18 Clypeus and labrum ™ 22 EpipharynxEpipharyru Mandibles. Maxillae 37 Hypopharynx <w Labium 40 Thorax and abdomen 40 Segmentation « 41 Setation Radula 41 42 Legs £ Spiracles 43 Anal orifice 44 Organs of stridulation 47 Postembryonic development and biology of the Scarabaeidae Eggs f*' Oviposition preferences 48 Description and length of egg stage 48 Egg burster and hatching Larval development Molting 50 Postembryonic changes ^4 54 Food habits 58 Relative abundance.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida March 2002 An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) Nadine A. Kriska University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI Daniel K. Young University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Kriska, Nadine A. and Young, Daniel K., "An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera)" (2002). Insecta Mundi. 537. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/537 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 16, No. 1-3, March-September, 2002 3 1 An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) Nadine L. Kriska and Daniel K. Young Department of Entomology 445 Russell Labs University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, WI 53706 Abstract. A survey of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) conducted from literature searches, collection inventories, and three years of field work (1997-1999), yielded 177 species representing nine families, two of which, Ochodaeidae and Ceratocanthidae, represent new state family records. Fifty-six species (32% of the Wisconsin fauna) represent new state species records, having not previously been recorded from the state. Literature and collection distributional records suggest the potential for at least 33 additional species to occur in Wisconsin. Introduction however, most of Wisconsin's scarabaeoid species diversity, life histories, and distributions were vir- The superfamily Scarabaeoidea is a large, di- tually unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • Ataenius Heinekeni Wollatson, 1894 (Insecta: Coleoptera: Aphodiinae)
    (A. heinekeni) Ataenius heinekeni Wollatson, 1894 (Insecta: Coleoptera: Aphodiinae) By: Edrick Lugo Millán & Verónica Acevedo Ramírez, Juliana Cardona, Nico Franz Geographic Range: Bahamas (Andros), Barbados (probably introduced), Cuba, Hispaniola, Puerto Rico (Quebradillas- east of Lago Guajataca, Bayamón, Mayagüez), St. Thomas. USA (SC-FLTX), Mexico to Brazil, introduced to Ascension and Madeira islands. Habitat: A. heinekeni beetles were beaten from leaves, collected under leaves and logs on hard ground, under live-oak trees, on old rice-field dams, under roadside debris and at coastal coppice trap. (Jerath,1960). They are mainly found in animal dung and decaying material. Physical Description: Ataenius is distinguished from other genera of the Eupariini by a combination of characters, among them head narrower than pronotum, anterior clypeus visible from above, pronotum laterally without denticles and at most sparsely to moderately ciliate, sides of pronotum not explanate, elytra often with basal margination, front tibiae with slanted anterior margin, middle and hind tibiae not flattened, uniformly wider from base, hind tibiae straight with outer apical angle spiniformly prolonged, tarsi normal with first segment often as long as the following three segments combined (SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY, no 154). Length 4.3.-5.5 mm. Usually reddish-brown to black, few with color patterns, some dorsally setose.. Head moderately convex, surface smooth, granulate, wrinkled, or rugose. Abdominal fluting is distinct. External sexual dimorphisms are subtle, if present. Life Stages: The life cycle of Ataenius beetles is not well known but apparently they are humus feeders in the soil, with a few species attracted to decaying vegetation and to animal dung.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Melolonthidae: Dynastinae)
    Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 61 (2017) 354–358 REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE Entomologia A Journal on Insect Diversity and Evolution www.rbentomologia.com Systematics, Morphology and Biogeography Description of the third instar larva of Saccharoscaptus laminifer (Dechambre) (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae: Dynastinae) Miguel Ángel Morón Red de Biodiversidad y Sistemática, Instituto de Ecología, Xalapa, Mexico a a b s t r a c t r t i c l e i n f o Article history: The larva of pentodontine S. laminifer is described for first time based on specimens collected under Received 4 April 2017 roots of sugarcane in Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Diagnostic structures are illustrated and the differences and Accepted 17 July 2017 similarities with other previously described larvae of South American genera of Pentodontini are outlined. Available online 29 July 2017 A key to the larvae of some American genera of pentodontines is included. Associate Editor: Adriana Marvaldi © 2017 Sociedade Brasileira de Entomologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Keywords: Morphology Taxonomy Biology White grubs Sugarcane Introduction Material and methods In the Americas, the tribe Pentodontini includes 32 genera and The classification of families of Scarabaeoidea used in the 151 species that occur from southern Canada to Argentina, with present paper was proposed by Endrödi (1966) and updated by four genera and nine species in the West Indies (Endrödi, 1969, Morón (2010) and Cherman and Morón (2014). Terms and charac- 1985; Morón and Grossi, 2015; Ratcliffe and Cave, 2015; López- ters used in the description of larva are those of Ritcher (1966), García et al., 2016), but only the larvae of nine genera (Aphonus Morón (1987), and Morón et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Jordan Beans RA RMO Dir
    Importation of Fresh Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), Shelled or in Pods, from Jordan into the Continental United States A Qualitative, Pathway-Initiated Risk Assessment February 14, 2011 Version 2 Agency Contact: Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory Center for Plant Health Science and Technology United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Plant Protection and Quarantine 1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 300 Raleigh, NC 27606 Pest Risk Assessment for Beans from Jordan Executive Summary In this risk assessment we examined the risks associated with the importation of fresh beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), in pods (French, green, snap, and string beans) or shelled, from the Kingdom of Jordan into the continental United States. We developed a list of pests associated with beans (in any country) that occur in Jordan on any host based on scientific literature, previous commodity risk assessments, records of intercepted pests at ports-of-entry, and information from experts on bean production. This is a qualitative risk assessment, as we express estimates of risk in descriptive terms (High, Medium, and Low) rather than numerically in probabilities or frequencies. We identified seven quarantine pests likely to follow the pathway of introduction. We estimated Consequences of Introduction by assessing five elements that reflect the biology and ecology of the pests: climate-host interaction, host range, dispersal potential, economic impact, and environmental impact. We estimated Likelihood of Introduction values by considering both the quantity of the commodity imported annually and the potential for pest introduction and establishment. We summed the Consequences of Introduction and Likelihood of Introduction values to estimate overall Pest Risk Potentials, which describe risk in the absence of mitigation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution
    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 20, No. 3-4, September-December, 2006 165 The beetle fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and distribution Stewart B. Peck Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada stewart_peck@carleton. ca Abstract. The beetle fauna of the island of Dominica is summarized. It is presently known to contain 269 genera, and 361 species (in 42 families), of which 347 are named at a species level. Of these, 62 species are endemic to the island. The other naturally occurring species number 262, and another 23 species are of such wide distribution that they have probably been accidentally introduced and distributed, at least in part, by human activities. Undoubtedly, the actual numbers of species on Dominica are many times higher than now reported. This highlights the poor level of knowledge of the beetles of Dominica and the Lesser Antilles in general. Of the species known to occur elsewhere, the largest numbers are shared with neighboring Guadeloupe (201), and then with South America (126), Puerto Rico (113), Cuba (107), and Mexico-Central America (108). The Antillean island chain probably represents the main avenue of natural overwater dispersal via intermediate stepping-stone islands. The distributional patterns of the species shared with Dominica and elsewhere in the Caribbean suggest stages in a dynamic taxon cycle of species origin, range expansion, distribution contraction, and re-speciation. Introduction windward (eastern) side (with an average of 250 mm of rain annually). Rainfall is heavy and varies season- The islands of the West Indies are increasingly ally, with the dry season from mid-January to mid- recognized as a hotspot for species biodiversity June and the rainy season from mid-June to mid- (Myers et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetically Modified Baculoviruses for Pest
    INSECT CONTROL BIOLOGICAL AND SYNTHETIC AGENTS This page intentionally left blank INSECT CONTROL BIOLOGICAL AND SYNTHETIC AGENTS EDITED BY LAWRENCE I. GILBERT SARJEET S. GILL Amsterdam • Boston • Heidelberg • London • New York • Oxford Paris • San Diego • San Francisco • Singapore • Sydney • Tokyo Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier Academic Press, 32 Jamestown Road, London, NW1 7BU, UK 30 Corporate Drive, Suite 400, Burlington, MA 01803, USA 525 B Street, Suite 1800, San Diego, CA 92101-4495, USA ª 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved The chapters first appeared in Comprehensive Molecular Insect Science, edited by Lawrence I. Gilbert, Kostas Iatrou, and Sarjeet S. Gill (Elsevier, B.V. 2005). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone (þ44) 1865 843830, fax (þ44) 1865 853333, e-mail permissions@elsevier.com. Requests may also be completed on-line via the homepage (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissions). Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Insect control : biological and synthetic agents / editors-in-chief: Lawrence I. Gilbert, Sarjeet S. Gill. – 1st ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-12-381449-4 (alk. paper) 1. Insect pests–Control. 2. Insecticides. I. Gilbert, Lawrence I. (Lawrence Irwin), 1929- II. Gill, Sarjeet S. SB931.I42 2010 632’.7–dc22 2010010547 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978-0-12-381449-4 Cover Images: (Top Left) Important pest insect targeted by neonicotinoid insecticides: Sweet-potato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci; (Top Right) Control (bottom) and tebufenozide intoxicated by ingestion (top) larvae of the white tussock moth, from Chapter 4; (Bottom) Mode of action of Cry1A toxins, from Addendum A7.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Remains from Various Sites in Southwark: Draft for Consultation
    Insect remains from various sites in Southwark: Draft for consultation H. K. Kenward Environmental Archaeology Unit, University of York, York YO1 5DD. [NB: This report was reformatted from a Runoff file on 18th March 2008. The only changes have been to preserve internal consistency and to correct typographical errors. HK. The original was an archive report deposited in the former Environmental Archaeology Unit, York, and the Ancient Monuments Laboratory, and allocated post hoc as Reports from the Environmental Archaeology Unit, York 90/10.] Introduction This report is an account of insect remains from a large number of samples from several sites in Southwark. The material was provided in processed form. The majority of the assemblages were dry in plastic tubes, and the remainder in IMS in glass vials. In some cases, material in both forms was available for a sample. Almost all the groups of insects were, by comparison with the material normally used for interpretation, very small, often only one to a few fragments. In a few cases some twenty or so individuals of beetles and bugs were represented by the remains; the largest group was perhaps twice this size, still less than half the number of individuals generally taken as a reasonable working minimum for interpretation of a mixed assemblage (Kenward 1978). The dry material appeared to be biassed in favour of large taxa, and presented considerable difficulty in handling because of the effect of static attraction between fossils and the plastic vials. Many fossils were damaged while attempting to remove them, and others sprang away as a result of static repulsion as soon as they were taken from the tubes.
    [Show full text]
  • Larvae of Ataenius (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Aphodiinae
    Eur. J. Entomol. 96: 57—68, 1999 ISSN 1210-5759 Larvae ofAtaenius (Coleóptera: Scarabaeidae: Aphodiinae): Generic characteristics and species descriptions José R. VERDÚ and E duardo GALANTE Departamento de Ciencias Ambientales y Recursos Naturales, Universidad de Alicante, E-03080 Alicante, Spain Key words.Scarabaeidae, Aphodiinae, Ataenius, larvae, description, key, dung beetles, turfgrass beetles, taxonomy Abstract. We compared the larval morphology of the genera Ataenius and Aphodius. The third larval instars of five Ataenius species: Ataenius opatrinus Harold, A. picinus Harold, A. platensis (Blanchard), A. simulator Harold and A. strigicauda Bates, are described or redescribed and illustrated. The most important morphological characteristics of the larvae of Ataenius are found in the respiratory plate of thoracic spiracle, the setation of venter of the last abdominal segment, the setation of the epicranial region and the morphology of the epipharynx. A key to larvae of the known species of Ataenius is included. INTRODUCTION del Sacramento (Uruguay). For the purpose of laboratory studies, a total of 10 to 20 adult specimens of each species were The genus Ataenius Harold comprises 320 species, of kept in cylindrical plastic breeding cages (20 cm high, 10 cm which 228 species are found in America, 49 in Australia, wide) with moist soil and dry cow dung from which they had 11 in Africa, 6 in East Asia, 2 in Madagascar, and single been collected. The lid was an opening (6 cm diameter) covered species in India, Sri Lanka, Turkestan, Japan, Hawaii and with gauze screen. These breeding cages were maintained in an Sumatra, respectively (Dellacasa, 1987). Despite the rich­ environmental chamber at 25 : 20°C (L : D), 80 ± 5% RH, with ness of this genus and its worldwide distribution, the lar­ a photoperiod of 15 : 9 (L : D).
    [Show full text]
  • Heteronychus Arator
    Heteronychus arator Scientific Name Heteronychus arator (Fabricius) Synonyms: Heteronychus arator australis Endrödi, Heteronychus indenticulatus Endrodi, Heteronychus madagassus Endrodi, Heteronychus sanctaehelenae Blanchard, Heteronychus transvaalensis Peringuey, Scarabaeus arator Fabricius Common Name(s) Black maize beetle, African black beetle, black lawn beetle, black beetle Type of Pest Beetle Figure 1. Illustration of each stage of the life Taxonomic Position cycle of the black maize beetle, showing a close up view of each stage and a Insecta, Coleoptera, Class: Order: background view showing that the eggs, Family: Scarabaeidae larvae, and pupae are all underground stages with the adults being the only stage Reason for Inclusion appearing above ground. Illustration CAPS Target: AHP Prioritized Pest List- courtesy of NSW Agriculture. http://www.ricecrc.org/Hort/ascu/zecl/zeck11 2006 – 2009 3.htm Pest Description Life stages are shown in Figures 1 and 2. 1 Eggs: White, oval, and measuring approximately 1.8 mm (approx. /16 in) long at time of oviposition. Eggs grow larger through development and become more 3 round in shape. Eggs are laid singly at a soil depth of 1 to 5 cm (approx. /8 to 2 in). Females each lay between 12 to 20 eggs total. In the field, eggs hatch after approximately 20 days. Larvae can be seen clearly with the naked eye (CABI, 2007; Matthiessen and Learmoth, 2005). Larvae: There are three larval instars. Larvae are creamy-white except for the brown head capsule and hind segments, which appear dark where the contents of the gut show through the body wall. The head capsule is smooth textured, 1 1 measuring 1.5 mm (approx.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Plant Parameters on Occurrence and Abundance Of
    HORTICULTURAL ENTOMOLOGY Influence of Plant Parameters on Occurrence and Abundance of Arthropods in Residential Turfgrass 1 S. V. JOSEPH AND S. K. BRAMAN Department of Entomology, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, 1109 Experiment Street, GrifÞn, GA 30223-1797 J. Econ. Entomol. 102(3): 1116Ð1122 (2009) ABSTRACT The effect of taxa [common Bermuda grass, Cynodon dactylon (L.); centipedegrass, Eremochloa ophiuroides Munro Hack; St. Augustinegrass, Stenotaphrum secundatum [Walt.] Kuntze; and zoysiagrass, Zoysia spp.], density, height, and weed density on abundance of natural enemies, and their potential prey were evaluated in residential turf. Total predatory Heteroptera were most abundant in St. Augustinegrass and zoysiagrass and included Anthocoridae, Lasiochilidae, Geocoridae, and Miridae. Anthocoridae and Lasiochilidae were most common in St. Augustinegrass, and their abundance correlated positively with species of Blissidae and Delphacidae. Chinch bugs were present in all turf taxa, but were 23Ð47 times more abundant in St. Augustinegrass. Anthocorids/lasiochilids were more numerous on taller grasses, as were Blissidae, Delphacidae, Cicadellidae, and Cercopidae. Geocoridae and Miridae were most common in zoysiagrass and were collected in higher numbers with increasing weed density. However, no predatory Heteroptera were affected by grass density. Other beneÞcial insects such as staphylinids and parasitic Hymenoptera were captured most often in St. Augustinegrass and zoysiagrass. These differences in abundance could be in response to primary or alternate prey, or reßect the inßuence of turf microenvironmental characteristics. In this study, SimpsonÕs diversity index for predatory Heteroptera showed the greatest diversity and evenness in centipedegrass, whereas the herbivores and detritivores were most diverse in St. Augustinegrass lawns. These results demonstrate the complex role of plant taxa in structuring arthropod communities in turf.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List of the Rutelinae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) of Oceania
    CHECK LIST OF THE RUTELINAE (COLEOPTERA, SCARABAEIDAE) OF OCEANIA By FRIEDRICH OHAUS BERNICE P. BISHOP MUSEUM OCCASIONAL PAPERS VOLUME XI, NUMBER 2 HONOLULU, HAWAII PUBLISHED BY THE MUSJ-:UM 1935 CHECK LIST OF THE RUTELINAE (COLEOPTERA, SCARABAEIDAE) OF OCEANIA By FRIEDRICH OHAUS MAINZ, GERMANY BIOLOGY The RuteIinae are plant feeders. In Parastasia the beetle (imago) visits flowers, and the grub (larva) lives in dead trunks of more or less hard wood. In Anomala the beetle is a leaf feeder, and the grub lives in the earth, feeding on the roots of living plants. In Adoretus the beetle feeds on flowers and leaves; the grub lives in the earth and feeds upon the roots of living plants. In some species of Anornala and Adoretus, both beetles and grubs are noxious to culti­ vated plants, and it has been observed that eggs or young grubs of these species have been transported in the soil-wrapping around roots or parts of roots of such plants as the banana, cassava, and sugar cane. DISTRIBUTION With the exception of two species, the Rutelinae found on the continent of Australia (including Tasmania) belong to the subtribe Anoplognathina. The first exception is Anomala (Aprosterna) antiqua Gyllenhal (australasiae Blackburn), found in northeast Queensland in cultivated places near the coast. This species is abundant from British India and southeast China in the west to New Guinea in the east, stated to be noxious here and there to cultivated plants. It was probably brought to Queensland by brown or white men, as either eggs or young grubs in soil around roots of bananas, cassava, or sugar cane.
    [Show full text]